Research article Topical Sections

First injera baking biomass gasifier stove to reduce indoor air pollution, and fuel use

  • Nearly 40% of the world population use biomass as their primary energy source, especially for cooking; but traditional and inefficient three-stone fires cause serious   health issues and their high fuel consumption leads to deforestation problems. Ethiopian cuisine is mainly based on vegetable and meat dishes in the form of a thick stew, served on top of injera, a large sourdough flatbread made out of fermented teff flour. Injera is known for its energy intensive and time consuming baking. It has remained rarely researched for alternative energy sources, although some improved biomass firing stoves have been introduced in the Ethiopian market. Thus, there is a need for a new efficient and clean stove that can drastically reduce the fuel consumption, emissions and indoor air pollution. In the present manuscript, the first injera biomass gasification baking stove is presented and its performance reported. A thermal efficiency of 16% is achieved, the specific fuel consumption is reduced by 12.8% , and baking time reduced by 19% compared with the three-stone fire. CO (Carbon Monoxide) and PM (Particulate matter) emissions are reduced, compared to the three-stone fire, by 99% and 87%, respectively. Heat losses and stored heat in the system are also calculated. Results show that it is possible to increase the efficiency and reduce the fuel consumption if the insulation is improved, the heating up time between consecutive baked injeras reduced and longer injera baking sessions, like in community kitchens, promoted. This first successful attempt to bake injera using a biomass gasifier stove in the eastern part of Africa shows promising result and can lead to an efficient and clean biomass gasifier stove that could be widely disseminated for injera baking.

    Citation: Kamil Dino Adem, Demiss Alemu Ambie, Maria Puig Arnavat, Ulrik Birk Henriksen, Jesper Ahrenfeldt, Tobias Pape Thomsen. First injera baking biomass gasifier stove to reduce indoor air pollution, and fuel use[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 227-245. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.227

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kamil Dino Adem, Demiss Alemu Ambie . Performance and emission reduction potential of micro-gasifier improved through better design. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(1): 63-76. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.1.63
    [2] Evrard Karol Ekouedjen, Latif Adéniyi Fagbemi, Stephen Junior Zannou-Tchoko, Jihane Bakounoure . Energy performance, safety and durability of charcoal cooking stoves commonly used in West Africa: Benin case study. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(1): 68-95. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021005
    [3] Sonia Longo, Maurizio Cellura, Francesco Guarino, Vincenzo La Rocca, Giuseppe Maniscalco, Massimo Morale . Embodied energy and environmental impacts of a biomass boiler: a life cycle approach. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 214-226. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.214
    [4] Sumera I. Chaudhry, Manohar Das . Design of optimum reference temperature profiles for energy saving control of indoor temperature in a building. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(6): 906-920. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.6.906
    [5] Constantinos S. Psomopoulos . Residue Derived Fuels as an Alternative Fuel for the Hellenic Power Generation Sector and their Potential for Emissions ReductionConstantinos S. Psomopoulos. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(3): 321-341. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.3.321
    [6] Ee Sann Tan, Kumaran Palanisamy, Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia, Kunio Yoshikawa . Performance and emission study on waste cooking oil biodiesel and distillate blends for microturbine application. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 798-809. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.798
    [7] S. Vinoth John Prakash, P.K. Dhal . Cost optimization and optimal sizing of standalone biomass/diesel generator/wind turbine/solar microgrid system. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 665-694. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022032
    [8] Mette Wik, Taoyuan Wei, Kristine Korneliussen, Rui Zhang, Solveig Glomsrød, Qinghua Shi . Drivers behind energy consumption by rural households in Shanxi. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 576-591. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.576
    [9] Muluken Biadgelegn Wollele, Abdulkadir Aman Hassen . Design and experimental investigation of solar cooker with thermal energy storage. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(6): 957-970. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.6.957
    [10] Gustavo Aguilar, Pranjali D. Muley, Charles Henkel, Dorin Boldor . Effects of biomass particle size on yield and composition of pyrolysis bio-oil derived from Chinese tallow tree (Triadica Sebifera L.) and energy cane (Saccharum complex) in an inductively heated reactor. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 838-850. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.838
  • Nearly 40% of the world population use biomass as their primary energy source, especially for cooking; but traditional and inefficient three-stone fires cause serious   health issues and their high fuel consumption leads to deforestation problems. Ethiopian cuisine is mainly based on vegetable and meat dishes in the form of a thick stew, served on top of injera, a large sourdough flatbread made out of fermented teff flour. Injera is known for its energy intensive and time consuming baking. It has remained rarely researched for alternative energy sources, although some improved biomass firing stoves have been introduced in the Ethiopian market. Thus, there is a need for a new efficient and clean stove that can drastically reduce the fuel consumption, emissions and indoor air pollution. In the present manuscript, the first injera biomass gasification baking stove is presented and its performance reported. A thermal efficiency of 16% is achieved, the specific fuel consumption is reduced by 12.8% , and baking time reduced by 19% compared with the three-stone fire. CO (Carbon Monoxide) and PM (Particulate matter) emissions are reduced, compared to the three-stone fire, by 99% and 87%, respectively. Heat losses and stored heat in the system are also calculated. Results show that it is possible to increase the efficiency and reduce the fuel consumption if the insulation is improved, the heating up time between consecutive baked injeras reduced and longer injera baking sessions, like in community kitchens, promoted. This first successful attempt to bake injera using a biomass gasifier stove in the eastern part of Africa shows promising result and can lead to an efficient and clean biomass gasifier stove that could be widely disseminated for injera baking.


    Nomenclature: ρ: density of the materials (kg/m3); ηth: thermal efficiency; A: heat transfer area (m2); Cp: specific heat capacity (kJ/kg.K); fd: equivalent fuel wood (g); ff: final weight of fuel (wood chips) (g); fi: initial weight of fuel (wood chips) (g); h1: convection heat transfer coefficient (W/m2.K); r: radius from the center (m); hfg: latent heat of vaporization of water (kJ/kg.K); HVchar: heating value of char (kJ/kg); HVfuel: heating value of fuel (kJ/kg); k: thermal conductivity of materials (W/m.K); L: length (m); m: moisture content of fuel (%); mchar: amount of char produced (kg); mevap: amount of water evaporated during injera baking [mbatter-minjera] (kg); mfuel: amount of fuel consumed (kg); minjera: mass of injera baked (kg); p: mass of empty 'sefied' plate (g); pf: mass of 'sefied' plate with baked injera (g); Qconv_cond: heat loss due to convection and conduction (kW); Qr: rate of radiation heat transfer (kW); Qstored: rate of thermal heat storage (kW); T: average temperature of injera during baking (℃); T1, T2…T6: surface temperature (℃), the subindex denotes the surface according to Figure 5; Tbatter: temperature of batter (℃); Tboil: boiling temperature of water (℃); Ts: surface temperature in absolute scale (K); Tsur: surrounding temperature in absolute scale (K); V: volume of materials (m3); Wf: net weight of food (g); Xm: moisture content of injera (%); ΔCc: mass of remaining char (g); ΔT: temperature difference (℃); ε: emissivity of the surface; σ: Stefan-Boltzmann constant (Ϭ = 5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4)

    Abbreviations: ASTM: American Society of Testing and Materials; CCT: Controlled Cooking Test; CO: Carbon Monoxide; EPA: Environmental Protection Agency; GIZ-ECO: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit—Energy Coordination Office; IBBGS: Injera Baking Biomass Gasifier Stove; IEA: International Energy Agency; PM: Particulate Matter; RTFD: Royal Thai and Forestry Department; SFC: Specific Fuel Consumption; UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; WBT: Water Boiling Test; WFP: World Food Program; WHO: World Health Organization

    Globally, there are approximately 1.2 billion people without access to electricity, and 4 billion people who rely on biomass for cooking [1]. The traditional and inefficient use of biomass creates a number of significant problems which include an estimated 4 million of annual deaths attributed to the negative health effects associated with indoor air pollution. More than 50% of the premature deaths of children below 5 years are caused by the presence of particulate matter in their kitchen because of the use of biomass [1]. In Ethiopia, the national electrification rate is around 25% [2]; being 85% in the urban areas and 10% in the rural areas [2]. So, it is expected that Ethiopia will depend on biomass as a primary energy source for quite a number of years to come [3].

    In developing countries, most people use three-stone fires for cooking or baking applications. When used indoors, these biomass cooking stoves lead to severe health issues because the smoke is vented into the home and pollutants concentration increases due to inadequately ventilated rooms causing chronic lung diseases, acute respiratory problems as well as vision problems. The main victims are usually women and young children, who are often carried on the mother's back while cooking. These traditional wood fires also imply a high risk of burns and scalds especially on children. Furthermore, because the heat is allowed to escape into the open air rather than heating the cooking vessel, three-stone fires have a low thermal efficiency of around 10% [4]. This implies a high fuel consumption which results in an increase of the amount of wood harvested and related deforestation.

    A number of efforts are underway to improve the performance of traditional biomass cooking stoves. In early stages of development, the focus was on improving specific parts of the stove such as the grate, skirt and insulation. However, nowadays, researches focus on reducing the emissions and increase the energy efficiency. For this reason, 'gasifier' or 'pyrolytic' stoves are receiving more attention [5].

    Biomass gasification is the thermochemical conversion process where a partial oxidation of biomass takes place and a gas phase and a solid phase are produced. The solid phase includes char and the inert material present in the biomass (ash). The gas phase is a combustible gas and can be used for power generation or biofuel production. The combustible gas produced, when using air as gasifying agent, consists mainly of CO, H2, CH4, CO2 and N2 [6]. However, the actual gas composition may vary considerably depending on fuel type and gasifier design. People living in rural areas of developing countries cannot afford buying forced draft or advanced biomass gasifier stoves, therefore research on natural draft gasifier stoves is prioritized [7]. Small-scale gasifier stoves are getting popular and considered the future clean cooking stoves due to their benefits in terms of smoke and soot free clean combustion [7]. Biomass gasification based cooking systems have also some other attractive advantages like high efficiency, uniform and steady flame, ease of flame control, and possible attention-free operation over extended duration [6]. Several hundred biomass gasifier cooking stoves are already in operation in countries such as China and India [6,8]. The possibilities and benefits of biomass gasification technology for cooking and baking applications are leading to a number of initiatives to introduce them in developing countries.

    Injera, a circular pancake or flat-bread with a diameter of 52 cm and 2–4 mm thick, is the national dish in Ethiopia and Eritrea. Injera is made with teff flour mixed with water and allowed to ferment for several days, as with sourdough starter. It can also be made from wheat, barley, maize, sorghum, or from a mixture of them [9]. The prepared flat-bread is porous, soft, thin, and sour-tasting. In order to prepare injera, a ceramic plate called mitad is required to be placed on top of the biomass stove [10,11]. Injera is known for its energy intensive and time consuming cooking. Traditionally, injera has been baked using three-stone fires. However, in Ethiopia, improved biomass cooking stoves were introduced in the early 1980s to reduce deforestation and indoor air pollution [12]. Comparing all the different types of improved biomass stoves developed earlier except the biogas injera baking stove, all the other improved biomass injera baking stoves are enclosed and some designs also include the option of sauce or stew heating using a pot or kettle [13]. The design most commonly used is the Mirt stove [14] but there is no injera biomass gasification baking stove available in the Ethiopian market. Despite these efforts to develop better stoves, injera baking process has remained rarely researched for alternative energy sources. For this reason, there is a real need to develop an attractive and efficient alternative to conventional wood stoves that could be used in institutional kitchens and rural communities.

    Authors conducted a research study to investigate already existing gasifier reactor designs for cooking stoves and to select one that could be adapted for injera baking [13]. The natural cross-draft gasifier stove (IGS-2) designed at the Asian Institute of Technology under the Renewable Energy Technologies in Asia: A Regional Research and Dissemination Programme (RETs in Asia) [15,16] was selected. The gasifier stove was initially designed for rice cooking in two pots [17]. The IGS-2 Gasifier stove was tested with different kind of fuels to evaluate its versatility and efficiency. An average efficiency of 17% with rice husk briquettes (two-pot configuration), 27% with wood chips and 22% with wood twigs was obtained [15]. The design was disseminated in the six Asian countries involved in the RETs in Asia regional programme resulting in modified and improved designs for different applications [18,19,20].

    The present manuscript presents the first prototype of injera baking biomass gasification stove. The modifications and improvements done to the original IGS-2 design are described together with the results of the tests carried out to evaluate its thermal efficiency, fuel consumption, emissions and indoor air pollution. The successful production and distribution of an injera baking biomass gasification stove in Ethiopia would represent a clean and efficient energy supply for cooking to avoid the problems caused by traditional use of biomass and would also reduce the risk of deforestation.

    The feedstock used for the experiment was eucalyptus tree wood cut into small pieces and sun dried for at least three to four weeks to reduce the moisture content to 5–6% (wb). This type of wood is commonly used for injera baking in rural areas of Ethiopia. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the wood, experimentally determined at Geological Survey of Ethiopia according to ASTM standard [21].

    Table 1.  Physical and thermal characteristics of wood (Eucalyptus).
    Characteristics Biomass (Eucalyptus)
    Size (mm × mm × mm) 20 × 20 × 25
    Bulk density (kg m-3) 480
    Moisture content (% wb) 5.64
    Volatile matter (% db) 80.81
    Ash content (% db) 0.54
    Fixed carbon (% db) 13.02
    Calorific value (MJ kg-1) 18.64

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The design of the injera baking biomass gasifier stove is based on the IGS-2 biomass gasifier design for institutional cooking developed at the Asian Institute of Technology [15,16]. It is a natural cross-draft gasifier stove (Figures 1 and 2) made using 2.5 mm thick mild steel sheet metal. It consists of four main parts: feed hopper, reactor, primary air inlet and combustion chamber. The different parts are attached together using bolts and nuts.

    Figure 1.  Experimental set-up of injera baking biomass gasifier stove.
    Figure 2.  Injera baking biomass gasifier stove and reactor under construction.

    The feed hopper is located above the reactor and conically shaped to facilitate the movement of woodchips down to the reactor. It is closed with a lid for easy loading of biomass and has a water seal to avoid gas leakage during the operation. The feed hopper is connected to the upper part of the reactor and the fuel moves down to the reactor by gravity. The reactor is a cylindrical body 2.5 mm thick, 400 mm diameter and 350 mm height. A grid placed in the reactor holds the biomass but allows the ashes to fall free through it. The ashes accumulated can be removed by opening a steel door located under the grate. The primary air inlet is an inverted 'L' shaped unit attached to the side of the reactor. The amount of primary air supplied to the reactor is controlled by a butterfly valve. Perforated steel sheets are used at the primary air inlet and exit areas to keep the fuel inside the reactor. A flange connects the producer gas outlet and the combustion chamber. The combustion chamber has a cylindrical shape and then it opens up in a conical structure to accommodate the ceramic pan (mitad). The cylindrical burner is equipped with a secondary air inlet sieve-like structure with a diameter of 150 mm. The reactor, feed hopper, gasholder, combustion unit and secondary air inlet sections are insulated using 50 mm thick fiberglass and covered with aluminum sheets. The injera baking cover is a standard item made of aluminum with a wooden holder at the edge.

    The teff dough used for making injera was prepared well in advance and left to ferment for 4 to 5 days with some left over batter from the previous baking session. Tests started by weighing the biomass introduced in the feed hopper and opening the primary air flap and ignition /ash removal door to start the ignition. The water sealing cover of the feed hopper was also opened to facilitate the initial combustion. A flame torch was used to ignite the fuel from below the grate through the ash removal opening. The startup usually takes around 10 min. After this time, the gas produced started to flow to the combustion chamber where it could be ignited using a flame torch. Once ignited, the baking pan (mitad) was placed on top of the combustion unit. Ground rapeseeds were used to oil the mitad when it was hot enough. When the ground rapeseed started to get burned, they were wiped off to pour the batter on the clay pan. Half minute after pouring the batter, the cover was closed and the injera was cooked for 3 minutes before taking it out from the baking pan. This procedure was repeated to bake 25–30 pieces of injera which is the usual amount baked per session for a single household in Ethiopia.

    The controlled cooking test protocol was used to determine the specific fuel consumption and baking time [22]. The batter bucket and the sefied (plate used to remove and pile up the injeras) were weighted before starting the test. When the test was finished, all stove openings were closed and the stove was allowed to cool down for a day. The ash from the ash container, the remaining unburned biomass and injeras produced and piled up on the seified were weighed to obtain the net amount of injeras produced and fuel used during the baking session.

    Tests were carried out in a typical Ethiopian kitchen of 2 m × 2 m × 2.5 m. The reactor temperature was measured with a thermocouple connected to a data logger and the surface temperature was measured using an infrared thermometer. According to the recommendations of the University of California [23], the instruments used for measuring carbon monoxide, particulate matter and room temperature were placed 100 cm from the edge of the combustion zone, at a height of 145 cm from the floor and 150 cm away from openable doors. CO was measured using EL-USB-CO data logger (Lascar Electronics Inc., USA) with an accuracy of ± 7 ppm. Room temperature was measured using EL-USB-TC-LCD (Lascar Electronics Inc., USA) with an accuracy of ± 1 ℃ and particulate matter was measured using UCB-PATS (Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, USA).

    Energy utilized for baking injera

    The amount of energy used to bake injera is a combination of sensible and latent heat used to evaporate the water and bake the injera to the required quality. The mass of evaporated water can be obtained from the difference between the initial weight of batter and the final baked injera [24]. The energy utilized to bake injera (Qinjera) is computed by using Eq 1.

    Qinjera=mbatterCp,batter(TboilTbatter)+(mbatterminjera)hfg (1)

    Specific fuel consumption

    The specific fuel consumption (SFC) is the amount of fuel consumed per unit of food cooked, in g per kg, calculated according to the controlled cooking stove testing protocol [22]. Equations 2 and 3 and 4 were used to calculate the equivalent fuel wood (fd), net weight of food (Wf) and SFC:

    fd=(fiff)[1(1.12m)]1.5mchar (2)
    Wf=pfp (3)
    SFC=fdWf1000 (4)

    Thermal efficiency

    The thermal efficiencies of both three-stone fire and injera baking biomass gasifier stove were calculated as the ratio of useful energy to the net energy input. The thermal efficiency was calculated using Eq 5:

    ηth=minjeraCp,injera(TboilTbatter)+mevaphfg(mfuelHVfuelmcharHVchar) (5)

    The specific heat capacity of injera is obtained from Eq 6 considering 70 percent water and 30 percent teff flour in the injera [25].

    CP,injera=1.337+6.998Xm5.336X2m0.05185lnT1 (6)

    1 T in this equation is in ℃.

    Heat losses

    Figure 3 shows the surface temperature of the injera baking gasifier stove measured using infrared thermometer. These temperature measurements were conducted for each of the components such as feed hopper, reactor, gas holder, secondary air entrance, combustion chamber and injera baking pan and cover. In order to estimate the heat losses from the Injera Baking Biomass Gasifier Stove (IBBGS), the measured surface temperatures and measured/assumed inside gas temperatures were used in the computation (Table 2).

    Figure 3.  Measured surface temperature of injera baking gasifier stove at steady state working condition.
    Table 2.  Measured surface temperature and measured/assumed inside gas temperature.
    No. Components of IBBGS Surface temp. (℃) Inside gas temp. (℃) Remark
    1 Lower part of feed hopper 141 141 sheet metal thickness 2 mm
    2 Middle part of feed hopper 40 80 same as upper cover of feed hopper 80 ℃
    3 Reactor 38 481 Measured Temperature
    4 Gas holder 36 400 nearly same as secondary air entrance point
    5 Secondary air bottom insulation 141 400 nearly same as secondary air entrance point
    6 Secondary air entrance 395 395 Measured Temperature
    7 Upper insulation for secondary air entrance 212 390 same as secondary air entrance point
    8 Combustion chamber cone 220 390 same as secondary air entrance point
    9 Combustion chamber cylinder 199 390 same as secondary air entrance point
    10 Injera baking plate 200 390 same as secondary air entrance point
    11 Injera baking cover 52 92 Boiling point of water in Addis
    12 Primary air connector 115 115 sheet metal thickness 2 mm
    13 Primary air suction line 63 63 sheet metal thickness 2 mm

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Conduction and convection heat transfer loss

    The construction of most of the components ofthe gasifier stove is based on different layers such as carbon steel, gypsum, fiber glass and aluminum cover, Figure 4 shows a representative figure for all the components. Thus, assuming interfacial contact resistances to be minimal, the heat transfer rate, which is a combination of conduction and convection is computed using Eq 7.

    Figure 4.  A representative figure for components of IBBGS. [1-Carbon steel, 2-ypsum, 3-Carbon steel, 4-Fiber glass, and 5-Aluminum].
    QConvcond=T1T,6(12πr1Lh1)+i=5i=1ln(ri+1/ri)2πkiL(12πr6Lh6) (7)

    Radiation Heat Loss

    The net thermal radiation loss from the components of IBBGS surface to the surrounding was calculated by using Eq 8.

    Qr=εσA(T4ST4sur) (8)

    Heat Storage Capacity

    The thermal energy stored in the injera baking biomass gasifier stove was estimated based on dividing the whole part into sub-components which includes: feed hopper, reactor, gas holder, secondary air insulation, combustion chamber and injera baking pan. Equation 9 was used to calculate the estimated thermal energy storage capacity of each component.

    Qstored=mCΔT=ρVCΔT2 (9)

    2 ΔT is the temperature difference between the inside gas and surface temperature

    The injera baking process is not like any other cooking process where a pot is placed and the ingredients boiled; instead, batter is poured on a hot clay pan at 180–220 ℃ [24]. A number of tests were performed to see the functionality of the first design of the injera baking biomass gasifier stove. Here, a representative data set from three of the tests is presented to show its performance.

    Assuming the average temperature of baking (i.e. starting at 20 ℃ and evaporation of the water at 92 ℃) which was 56 ℃ have been considered for calculating the specific heat capacity of injera/batter which is 3.4 kJ/kg.K. Thus, the average amount of energy required to bake a single session injera baking which was 30 injera become 14.6 MJ (Table 3).

    Table 3.  Thermal efficiency of injera baking biomass gasifier stove compared with three-stone fire.
    No. Description Type of injera baking stove
    Injera baking biomass gasifier stove Three-stone fire
    Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average
    1 minjera(kg) 11.4 9.8 9.5 10.2 9.7
    2 Number of injera baked (pcs) 33 28 29 30 27
    3 Baking time (min) 138 81 125 115 128
    4 Cp, injera(kJ/kg.K) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3 3.4
    5 Tboil (0C) 92 92 92 92 92
    6 Tbatter (0C) 23 18.8 19.0 20 20.6
    7 mevp(kg) 6.18 5.12 4.80 5.4 5.26
    8 hfg (kJ/kg) 2260 2260 2260 2260 2260
    9 mfuel (kg) 12.23 9.49 9.08 10.27 10.77
    10 HVfuel (kJ/kg) 18640 18640 18640 18640 18640
    11 mchar(kg) 4.20 2.54 3.52 3.42 1.00
    12 Hvchar(kJ/kg) 27973 27973 27973 27973 27973
    13 Qinjera (MJ)= minjera * Cp(Tboil-Tbatter)+ mevap* hfg 16.6 14.0 13.2 14.6 14.2
    14 Qfuel(MJ)=(mfuel *HVfuel) 227.9 177 169 191 201
    15 Qchar (MJ)= (mchar * HVchar) 117.5 71.1 98.5 95.7 28.0
    16 Qnet-input(MJ)= Qfuel - Qchar 110.4 105.8 70.8 95.7 172.8
    17 Thermal Eff.(%)=[Qinjera/Qnet-input]*100% 15 13 19 16 8
    19 Percentage improvement of injera baking biomass gasifier stove compared to Three-stone fire 100%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Considering the injera baking biomass gasifier stove as a control volume, the energy balance of the system was carried out. Figure 5 shows the energy input, lost and useful energy generated during the injera baking process.

    Figure 5.  Sankey diagram for the injera baking biomass gasifier stove.

    The thermal efficiency of the present injera baking biomass gasifier stove was 16% while the efficiency of the three-stone fire for injera baking was 8% (Table 3). This shows an increase of the efficiency of around 100% compared to the three-stone fire. These results are slightly lower but in good agreement with those presented by other authors. Bhattacharya and Leon [15] tested the original IGS-2 stove design and found an average efficiency of 17% using rice husk briquettes (two-pot configuration), 27% using wood chips and 22% using wood twigs. Panwar and Rathore [26] tested another biomass gasifier stove designed for woody biomass and achieved a thermal efficiency of 26.5%. Belonio [27] tested a gasifier stove using rice husk as a feedstock and obtained a thermal efficiency of 27%. The lower efficiency found for the injera baking biomass gasifier stove could be explained because of the differences between the injera baking process and the water boiling process. During the injera baking process, 35% of the total baking time is used for heating up because higher temperatures in the mitad are needed (180–220 ℃) when compared with boiling water. Thus, the amount of heat lost through the baking pan during the heat up time between baking two consecutive injera is probably responsible for the lower efficiency. In order to calculate the specific heat capacity of injera, moisture content of injera was considered to be 70% [25].

    Conduction and convection heat losses

    In order to obtain the amount of convection and conduction heat transfer from the gasifier stove, Equation 7 has been used to obtain the value for each component and summed up to get the total heat loss due to convection and conduction. In this calculation, the temperature inside the gasifier stove and surface temperature (Table 2) was used as basic parameters. The unit in consideration can have composite materials such as carbon steel, gypsum, fiber-glass, and aluminum or some of the above materials. The thermo-physical properties of each material with their respective heat transfer area are calculated to obtain the thermal resistance in series for each material. Using the stated equation, the amount of energy lost due to convection and conduction was calculated separately and summed up. The rate equation is changed into energy loss using the average working time of the gasifier stove. Thus, the estimated total energy lost due to convection and conduction becomes 19.3 MJ.

    Radiation heat transfer

    Since the gasifier stove's surface temperature varies throughout the body, the heat loss due to radiation was another point of consideration. Using Eq 8 where emissivity of each materials, surface and surrounding temperatures (Table 2) were used to estimate the total rate of radiation loss from the gasifier stove. The rate of energy loss was converted into radiation energy loss using the operation time of the gasifier stove. Therefore, the total amount of radiation energy lost from the gasifier stove was estimated to be 4.48 MJ.

    Heat loss calculations of the biomass gasifier stove components showed that insulation played a major role to increase the efficiency and avoid the heat losses. The estimated heat losses which consist of conduction, convection and radiation during the injera baking process including the unaccounted losses were around 49.8 MJ and it is believed that additional insulation could further minimize these heat losses. The injera baking pan is responsible for part of the heat losses (10.3 MJ) that occur mainly during the heating up interval between baking two consecutive injeras. As previously mentioned, 35% of the total baking time is used for heating up the baking pan to the right temperature (180–220 ℃). Earlier studies also confirmed that the heat up time should be reduced to increase the thermal efficiency of injera baking devices [28]. In addition to the baking pan, the combustion chamber, reactor and primary air inlet present the highest heat losses. The minimization of these heat losses is a priority for future improvements of the design.

    The thermal energy stored in the gasifier stove was calculated using Eq 9. In this computation, for each material, the density, volume including surface and inside gas temperatures of the gasifier stove (Table 2) were used to calculate the total amount of energy stored in the system.

    In addition to heat losses, heat energy was stored in various components of the injera baking biomass gasifier stove. The component that stored more than 90% of the thermal energy was the reactor. The reactor has double insulation using gypsum and fiber glass at the outer part of the unit. Table 4 shows the amount of energy stored in each component. The already existing biomass injera baking stoves have comparatively less thermal storage capacity than the gasifier stove. Thus, the injera baking biomass gasifier stove is expected to increase in performance with increasing the number of injera baked per session [11,28].

    Table 4.  Thermal storage capacity of each of the components of IBBGS.
    No. Components of IBBGS Q Thermal_storage _total (MJ) Percent from total (%)
    1 Lower part of feed hopper 0 0.0
    2 Middle part of feed hopper 0.066 0.2
    3 Reactor 28.086 91.0
    4 Gasholder 0.416 1.3
    5 Secondary air bottom insulation 0.037 0.1
    6 Secondary air entrance 0.000 0.0
    7 Upper insulation for secondary air entrance 0.037 0.12
    8 Combustion chamber cone 0.027 0.1
    9 Combustion chamber cylinder 0.085 0.3
    10 Injera baking pan 2.114 6.8
    11 Injera baking cover 0 0.0
    12 Primary air connector 0 0.0
    13 Primary air suction line 0 0.0
    30.87

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The amount of fuel consumed per injera baked was calculated and compared with a three stone-fire under the same conditions. The results showed that the specific fuel consumption (SFC) of the three-stone fire was 1217 g of fuel/kg of injera and that of the biomass gasifier stove on average was 1061 g fuel/kg of injera (Table 5). This means a 12.8% reduction on the specific fuel consumption. It is important to bear in mind that the test was conducted for 25–30 injeras and the initial heat absorbed by the apparatus is high. As stated by other researchers, there is a decrease in the specific fuel consumption when increasing the number of injeras baked per session [11]. These authors suggest that the promotion of longer injera baking sessions like in community kitchens may lead to additional fuel wood savings. This is an interesting concept if household size and baking sessions decrease in future due to urbanization and family planning [29]. So, the present design would have a much lower specific fuel consumption if operated at a larger scale e.g. 1000 injera per day.

    Table 5.  Specific fuel consumption of injera baking biomass gasifier stove compared with three stone fire.
    No. Parameters Units Type of stove
    Three-stone fire Injera baking biomass gasifier
    Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average
    1 Initial wt. of fuel wood g 31,108.90 20017 20007 20,055 20026
    2 Final wt. of fuel wood g 16,590.70 678 6,500 4,989 4056
    3 Moisture content % 0.077 0.054 0.052 0.0674 0.058
    4 Wt. of charcoal with container g 1500.00 11,739 9,700 11,000 10813
    5 Wt. of empty plate('sefed') g 1117 1117 1116.1 1174 1136
    6 Wt. of plate('sefed') with injera g 10,789 12486 9683 10,656 10941
    7 Wt. of container for char g 500 7778 7780 7776 7778
    8 Wt. of injera baked g 9,671.80 11,369 8,566 9,482 9806
    9 Wt. of char remaining g 1000.00 3,961 1,921 3224 3035
    10 Equivalent dry wood consumed g 11766.15 12,228 9840 9093 10387
    12 Specific Fuel Consumption g/kg of injera 1217 1076 1149 959 1061

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The time required for baking injera was considered as a comparison parameter for determining the stove performance. On average, the time to bake a single injera was 3.83 min for the biomass gasifier stove, while it took 4.74 min for a three-stone fire. As a result, a 19% reduction of baking time was achieved. For other improved injera biomass baking stoves, authors have reported from increases of 7% of the baking time [30] to reductions of 5% [31], 7% [32], 15% [33] and 17% [34]. Thus, the reduction achieved with the present design is reasonably high compared with other biomass based stoves for the same application.

    According to the World Health Organization, the acceptable amount of carbon monoxide during 1 hour of exposure is 30 ppm [35]. The concentration monitored during the baking session with the injera biomass gasifier stove reached a maximum of 5.5 ppm (Figure 6) which is significantly lower than the 525 ppm from the three-stone fire (Figure 7). A value of 7.2 ppm was reported for the Mirt injera baking stove [30]. BhattacharyaAlbina and Myint Khaing [36] studied the effects of different parameters (fuel moisture content, size of fuel, size of pot and method of ignition) on performance and emissions of three biomass stoves (an improved Indian stove, a Vietnamese traditional stove and an improved stove developed by RTFD). They observed a reduction of efficiency and an increase of the CO emissions when increasing the fuel moisture content. The most favorable CO emission values that they observe during their tests was 19.3 ppm for the RTFD stove. In light of these results, the present injera baking biomass gasifier design achieves a drastic reduction of CO concentration values compared with the three-stone fire and lower values than those reported for other improved biomass based cooking stoves.

    Figure 6.  CO concentration during injera baking session using the injera baking biomass gasifier stove.
    Figure 7.  CO concentration in using a three-stone fire injera baking stove.

    The amount of soot or particulate matter (PM) existing in a kitchen has an impact on the health of people in the room. The maximum recorded PM concentration during the baking session with the present gasifier stove design was 6.13 mg/m3 (Figure 8). This value is well below the WHO standards that recommend concentrations below 10 mg/m3 for annual exposure and 25 mg/m3 during 24 hours exposure (WHO 2010). As shown in Figure 9, the maximum PM recorded during injera baking using a three-stone fire was around 47.4 mg/m3. Based on these maximum values, the percentage of improvement of the injera baking biomass gasifier stove is 87% compared to the three-stone fire. MacCarty et al. (2010) reported that a properly functioning gasifier stove can reduce PM by 90% compared to three-stone fire.

    Figure 8.  Particulate Matter recorded during injera baking process using the injera baking biomass gasifier stove.
    Figure 9.  Particulate Matter recorded during injera baking process using a three-stone fire stove.

    Majority of people living in developing countries use biomass for cooking and baking, and injera baking is one of the main cooking activities undertaken in the eastern part of Africa, especially in Ethiopia and Eritrea. This manuscript presents the first biomass injera baking gasifier stove designed. Its performance is compared with that of a three-stone fire usually used for injera baking. The PM and CO emission reductions when using the gasifier stove for baking injera showed a remarkable improvement of 87 and 99%, respectively. The average thermal efficiency achieved was around 16% which is higher than three-stone fire (8%). Heat losses in the components of the biomass gasifier stove were calculated and the baking pan proved to be responsible for 21% of the total heat loss. The thermal storage capacity of the components was also studied and showed that 90% of the energy stored in the system was in the reactor. These results showed that there is room for improvement by further reducing the heat losses from the stove, heat up time between consecutive baked injeras and by increasing the number of injeras baked per session. This first attempt to develop an injera baking biomass gasifier stove achieved promising results and, if improved and widely distributed, it could contribute to reduce deforestation, emissions and health problems caused by elevated concentrations of pollutants in the kitchen when using inefficient three-stone fires.

    Authors would like to thank Addis Ababa University (AAU) for funding the present study and for covering all the expenses during the external stay at Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Authors would also show their gratitude to the members of Biomass Gasification Group at the Chemical Engineering Department of DTU who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. In addition, authors would like to thank the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE), Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Electricity, and Ethio Resource Group (ERG) PLC for lending the instruments which we used for various measurements during the testing period.

    All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.



    [1] WHO (2018) Household Air Pollution and Health. Fact Sheet No 292.
    [2] IEA (2017) World Energy Outlook 2016, Electricity access in Africa-2017.
    [3] Beyene AD, Koch SF (2013) Clean fuel-saving technology adoption in urban Ethiopia. Energy Econ 36: 605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.003
    [4] UNFCCC (2018) CDM, Small-Scale Methodology: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications (AMS-II.G).
    [5] Kumar M, Kumar S, Tyagi SK (2013) Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 26: 265–285. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.010
    [6] Bhattacharya SC, Leon MA (2005) Prospects for biomass gasifiers for cooking applications in Asia.
    [7] Sutar KB, Kohli S, Ravi MR, et al. (2015) Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 41: 1128–1166.
    [8] Kshirsagar MP, Kalamkar VR (2014) A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 30: 580–603. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039
    [9] Stewart RB, Getachew A (1962) Investigations of the nature of injera. Econ Bot 16: 127–130. doi: 10.1007/BF02985300
    [10] World Food Program E (2014) Fuel Efficient Stove for Ethiopia Programme of Activity.
    [11] Dresen E, DeVries B, Herold M, et al. (2014) Fuelwood savings and carbon emission reductions by the use of improved cooking stoves in an Afromontane Forest, Ethiopia. Land 3: 1137–1157. doi: 10.3390/land3031137
    [12] EPA (2002) The Second National Report on the Implementation of the UNCCD/NAP in Ethiopia.
    [13] Adem KD, Ambie DA (2017) A review of injera baking technologies in Ethiopia: Challenges and gaps. Energy Sustainable Dev 41: 69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.003
    [14] GIZ-ECO, Office Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zuammenarbeit (2011) Mirt Stove Ethiopia.
    [15] Bhattacharya SC, Leon MA (2003) A Biomass-Fired Gasifier Stove (IGS-2) For Institutional Cooking.
    [16] Reginoal Energy Resources Information Center (2004) Biomass Gasifier Stove DGS2: Design Construction and Operation Manual. Pathumthani, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology.
    [17] Knoef HAM (2005) Handbook Biomass Gasification.
    [18] Simkhada KP (2005) A Study on the performance of a domestic gasifier stove. Msc Thesis, Pulchowk Campus: Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
    [19] Basnyat MS (2004) A study on gasifier based drying of large cardamom: a case study of ilam district. Msc Thesis, Pulchowk Campus: Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
    [20] Ale BB, Bhattarai N, Gautam J, et al. (2009) Institutional gasifier stove: A sustainable prospect for institutional cooking. J Institure of Eng 7: 142–149.
    [21] American Society of Testing Materials (1983) Annual book of ASTM standard, 19103.
    [22] Rob Bailis (2004) Controlled Cooking Test (CCT). Household Energy and Health Programme, Shell Foundation.
    [23] University of California Berkely (2005) Installing Indoor Air Pollution Instruments in a Home, Version 5.1.
    [24] Hassen AA, Amibe DA, Nydal OJ (2011) Performance investigation of solar powered Injera Baking oven for indoor cooking. ISES Solar World Congress Proceedings, Kassel , Germany: 186–196.
    [25] Hassen AA (2014) Design, manufacturing and experimental investigation of solar powered Injera Baking Oven for indoor cooking. PhD Dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa , Ethiopia.
    [26] Panwar NL, Rathore NS (2008) Design and performance evaluation of a 5 kW producer gas stove. Biomass Bioenergy 32: 1349–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.007
    [27] Belonio AT (2005) Rice Husk Gas Stove Handbook.
    [28] Hassen AA, Amibe DA (2013) Finite element modeling of solar powered injera baking oven for indoor cooking. J Energy Power Eng 7: 8.
    [29] Headey D, Josephson A, Ricker-Gilbert J (2012) Population pressure & farm size evolution in Ethiopia: Threads of a narrative; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    [30] Yosef AF (2007) Assessing environmental benefits of mirt stove with particular reference to indoor air pollution (Carbon Monoxide & Suspended Particulate Matter) and energy conservation. Msc Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    [31] Walelign G, Alemnesh T, Negussie M, et al. (2013) A Report on controlled cooking test (CCT) results on awramba stove.
    [32] Anteneh G (2014) A Report on controlled cooking test of gonzie stove. GIZ Energy Coordination Office (GIZ ECO-Ethiopia) report.
    [33] Alemayehu ZT, Yishak S, Almnesh T, et al. (2012) A Report on controlled cooking test results made on muliti-fuel and chimeny integrated injera baking stoves. GIZ Energy Coordination Office (GIZ ECO-Ethiopia) report.
    [34] Anteneh G, Walelign G (2011) A Report on controlled cooking test results perfomed on 'Mirt with integrated Chimeny' and 'Institutional Mirt ' stoves.
    [35] WHO Regional Office for Europe (2010) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants.
    [36] Bhattacharya SC, Albina DO, Khaing AM (2002) Effects of selected parameters on performance and emission of biomass-fired cookstoves. Biomass Bioenergy 23: 387–395. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00062-4
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Fikadu Mamuye Bayu, Cost reduction and forest preservation potential of advanced stoves and challenges of their adoption in higher education: the case of werabe university, Ethiopia, 2020, 6, 24058440, e04693, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04693
    2. Stergios Emmanouil, Jason Philhower, Sophie Macdonald, Fahad Khan Khadim, Meijian Yang, Ezana Atsbeha, Himaja Nagireddy, Natalie Roach, Elizabeth Holzer, Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, A Comprehensive Approach to the Design of a Renewable Energy Microgrid for Rural Ethiopia: The Technical and Social Perspectives, 2021, 13, 2071-1050, 3974, 10.3390/su13073974
    3. Tayachew Nega, Assefa Tesfaye, Prabhu Paramasivam, Design and CFD modeling of gasifier stove combined with heat exchanger for water heating application, 2022, 12, 2158-3226, 045121, 10.1063/5.0081001
    4. Bassazin Ayalew Mekonnen, Thermal efficiency improvement and emission reduction potential by adopting improved biomass cookstoves for sauce-cooking process in rural Ethiopia, 2022, 38, 2214157X, 102315, 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102315
    5. Mengistu Jemberu Dagnaw, Fayza Shemsu Kedir, Mahesh Gopal, Investigation of different clay compositions and additives for energy-efficient and impact-resistant Injera baking pan, 2023, 22147853, 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.035
    6. Jasper Okino, Allan John Komakech, Joshua Wanyama, Herbert Ssegane, Elly Olomo, Timothy Omara, Pallav Purohit, Performance Characteristics of a Cooking Stove Improved with Sawdust as an Insulation Material, 2021, 2021, 2314-4394, 1, 10.1155/2021/9969806
    7. Arkbom Hailu, Development and performance analysis of top lit updraft: natural draft gasifier stoves with various feed stocks, 2022, 8, 24058440, e10163, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10163
    8. S. M. Negash, I. M. B. Omiogbemi, I. M. Dagwa, 2021, 2341, 0094-243X, 030001, 10.1063/5.0049946
    9. Arkbom Hailu Asfaw, Development and Performance Analysis of Top Lit- Updraft - Natural Draft Gasifier Stoves with Various Feed Stocks, and Correlation of Gasifier Stove Efficiency with Charcoal End Production, 2021, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.3969707
    10. Meseret Alemu Abinet, Abdulkadir A. Hassen, G. Gashaw, Fayaz Hussain, Numerical Investigation on Charging–Discharging of a PCM Using PV and Thermal Oil for Injera Baking Application, 2024, 2024, 1110-662X, 10.1155/2024/5561719
    11. Lamesgin Addisu Getnet, Addisu Alamirew Meku, Muluken Zegeye Getie, Mekete Mulualem Mebratu, 2023, Chapter 11, 978-3-031-33609-6, 199, 10.1007/978-3-031-33610-2_11
    12. Imlisongla Aier, Ujjiban Kakati, Virendra Kumar Vijay, Priyanka Kaushal, Performance evaluation of popular improved biomass cookstoves from a rural community along the Indo-Gangetic Plains, 2024, 14, 2190-6815, 24207, 10.1007/s13399-023-04674-z
    13. Dawit Tessema Ebissa, Eshetu Getahun, Mario L. Ferrari, Development and Performance Evaluation of Biomass-Based Injera Baking Gasifier Stove: A Case Study of Clean Cooking Technologies in Ethiopia, 2024, 2024, 1537-744X, 1, 10.1155/2024/1524398
    14. Mebratu Assefa Gebeyehu, Getnet Ayele Kebede, Sameer Gajghate, Innovative Automation in Injera Production: Design and Performance of a Relay‐Based Control System, 2024, 2024, 2314-4904, 10.1155/je/8035397
    15. Taha Abdella, Demiss Alemu, Kamil Dino, Design and experimental investigation of an LPG injera baking stove for sustainable energy use in Ethiopia, 2024, 4, 2730-7719, 10.1007/s43937-024-00055-3
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7373) PDF downloads(2230) Cited by(15)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog