Location-based reverse data delivery between infrastructure and vehicles

Farhan Khan; Sing Kiong Nguang; Farhan Khan; Sing Kiong Nguang

doi:10.3934/electreng.2021009

AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering

2021, Volume 5, Issue 2: 158-175. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2021009

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Location-based reverse data delivery between infrastructure and vehicles

Farhan Khan ^,,
Sing Kiong Nguang

Department of Electrical, Computer, and Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, 20 Symonds Street, Auckland CBD, Auckland, New Zealand

Received: 26 January 2021 Accepted: 08 June 2021 Published: 10 June 2021

Reverse data delivery is one of the key operations in vehicular ad hoc networks which allows data delivery from roadside units (infrastructure) to vehicles. In the past, a number of data dissemination schemes have been proposed by researchers for the vehicular ad hoc networks to tackle the problem of data forwarding from vehicles and roadside units to data concentration points or Access Points (APs). In contrast, schemes for reverse data forwarding which allows a data concentration point to apprise the on-road vehicles about any eventuality or developing hazardous conditions are very few. This paper proposes a reverse data forwarding scheme which utilizes the characteristics of the road networks to inform passing vehicles of important information related to any accident, crash, or hazardous road conditions. The proposed scheme takes into account the geographical proximity factor by considering a localized sub-region/segment in the greater road network which is most adversely affected by the occurrence of some unfortunate road event. For its implementation, the scheme is dependent on DSRC-enabled roadside equipment to relay road-safety messages from AP to vehicles. In case if the passing vehicles are not fitted with DSRC on-board units, the scheme has the capability to directly interact with the variable-message signs on intersections with the objective of reaching as many vehicles as possible to increase the chances of message delivery. Simulation results using a small road segment confirm that the proposed scheme is more effective when the localized sub-region is smaller or in other words when more vehicles in the vicinity of the accident location are provided with pre-warning messages.

Keywords:

Citation: Farhan Khan, Sing Kiong Nguang. Location-based reverse data delivery between infrastructure and vehicles[J]. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2021, 5(2): 158-175. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2021009

Related Papers:

[1]	Rahat Zarin, Usa Wannasingha Humphries, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah . Computational modeling of fractional COVID-19 model by Haar wavelet collocation Methods with real data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 11281-11312. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023500
[2]	Biplab Dhar, Praveen Kumar Gupta, Mohammad Sajid . Solution of a dynamical memory effect COVID-19 infection system with leaky vaccination efficacy by non-singular kernel fractional derivatives. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 4341-4367. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022201
[3]	Somayeh Fouladi, Mohammad Kohandel, Brydon Eastman . A comparison and calibration of integer and fractional-order models of COVID-19 with stratified public response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 12792-12813. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022597
[4]	Salma M. Al-Tuwairqi, Sara K. Al-Harbi . Modeling the effect of random diagnoses on the spread of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 9792-9824. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022456
[5]	Saima Akter, Zhen Jin . A fractional order model of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2544-2565. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023119
[6]	Hamdy M. Youssef, Najat A. Alghamdi, Magdy A. Ezzat, Alaa A. El-Bary, Ahmed M. Shawky . A new dynamical modeling SEIR with global analysis applied to the real data of spreading COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7018-7044. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020362
[7]	Abdon ATANGANA, Seda İǦRET ARAZ . Piecewise derivatives versus short memory concept: analysis and application. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8601-8620. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022399
[8]	Hardik Joshi, Brajesh Kumar Jha, Mehmet Yavuz . Modelling and analysis of fractional-order vaccination model for control of COVID-19 outbreak using real data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 213-240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023010
[9]	Tao Chen, Zhiming Li, Ge Zhang . Analysis of a COVID-19 model with media coverage and limited resources. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 5283-5307. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024233
[10]	Jiajia Zhang, Yuanhua Qiao, Yan Zhang . Stability analysis and optimal control of COVID-19 with quarantine and media awareness. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 4911-4932. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022230

Abstract

1. Introduction

Covid-19 is a pandemic infections which globally has caused damage to human lives and also effect other lining things. This coronavirus has been a terrible epidemic for mankind around the globe. The transmission of COVID-19 has significant negative effects on the lives of all people, and the many people have died from the virus. The first attack of these viruses occurred on last days of 2019. Symptoms of unfamiliar conditions of lungs, coughing, fever, tiredness and breathing problems were seen in the people of Wuhan, China. The healthy territory of China as well as its Central Infections Control (CDC) quickly reconsidered the cause of such signs, a viral virus from the population of Coronaviruses, and it was named as COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) ^[1,2,3].

For the investigation of the new coronavirus in terms of predictions and infectivity, the authors in ^[4] established a deep analysis algorithm and found that bat and minks are the main sourced of the said virus. Mostly, mathematical models have had an important role in modeling the direct transmission between humans in the outbreak. As demonstrated in the literature, many people were infected in Wuhan and had no contact with other people, but the virus spread very rapidly in the whole province and China ^[5]. The infected people have a long incubation period, they are not aware of the symptoms and don not know the quarantine time. This infection can easily spread to other people, and many researchers have documented models of COVID-19 ^[6,7,8,9,10]. Several researchers have developed the COVID-19 time delay models and studied by different aspects. Most of them modified the said models by the application of fractional operators such as Power and Mittag-Leffler law ^{[11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]}.

In this article, we have re-considered the COVID-19 mathematical model ^[19], which has not been investigated under novel piecewise derivative and integrals operators. The considered model has ten agents, namely: Susceptible $\mathbb{S}$ , Infectious $\mathbb{I}$ , Diagnosed $\mathbb{D}$ , Ailing $\mathbb{A}$ , Recognized $\mathbb{R}$ , Infectious Real $\mathbb{I}_r$ , Threatened $\mathbb{T}$ , Recovered Diagnosed $\mathbb{H}_d$ , Healed $\mathbb{H}$ , and Extinct population $\mathbb{E}$ . The COVID-19 model has the following form:

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{split}& \dot{\mathbb{S}} = -(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}\\& \dot{\mathbb{I}} = -(\epsilon+\zeta+\lambda)\mathbb{I}+(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}\\& \dot{\mathbb{D}} = -(\eta+\rho)\mathbb{D}+\epsilon\mathbb{I}\\& \dot{\mathbb{A}} = -(\theta+\mu+\kappa)\mathbb{A}+\zeta\mathbb{I}\\& \dot{\mathbb{R}} = -(\nu+\xi)\mathbb{R}+\eta\mathbb{D}\theta\mathbb{A}\\& \dot{\mathbb{I}_r} = (\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}\\& \dot{\mathbb{T}} = -(\sigma+\tau)\mathbb{T}+\mu\mathbb{A}+\nu\mathbb{R}\\& \dot{\mathbb{H}_d} = \rho\mathbb{D}\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{T}\\& \dot{\mathbb{H}} = \lambda\mathbb{I}+\rho\mathbb{D}+\kappa\mathbb{A}+\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{A}\\& \dot{\mathbb{E}} = \tau\mathbb{T}, \end{split} \end{eqnarray}$

(1.1)

where the used parameters in the model with descriptions are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Parameters and their description in model 1.1.

Parameter	Description
$\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta$	transfer rates from Susceptible class to infectious,
	Diagnosed, Ailing and Recognized stages, respectively
$\epsilon$	Rates of detecting related to Asymptomatic person and
$\theta$	detecting rate of Symptomatic individuals
$\zeta, \eta_1$	Rates of Awareness and Non-awareness classes from being infected
$\mu$	Rate at which Un-detected class transfers to Threaten class
$v$	Rate at which Detected classes transfer to Threaten class
$\tau$	Death rate of Threaten individuals, transfer to Extinct class
$\lambda, \kappa, \xi, \sigma, \rho$	Rates of Recovery from five Compartments

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Modern calculus (MC) has attracted more interest from researchers and scientists in the last 20 years ^[20,21]. MC, compared to traditional integer-order models, gives novel, accurate, and deeper information on the complicated activity of several infectious disease mathematical models ^{[22,23,24,25]}. Because of genetic properties and memory behaviors, integer order problems are not superior to MC problems. Many types of integer order equations are used in mathematical models of the real world. The real phenomena are analyzed for a higher degree of choices and precision by applying the fractional differential equations. Several researchers have done enough work in MC, and the authors in ^[26] used the Mittag-Leffler derivative and investigated the fractional infectious disease model. In ^[27], the authors used Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional derivative and studied a mathematical model of Covid-19. The authors in ^[28] applied the Caputo-Fabrizio operator along with double Laplace transform and found the series solution for the fractional biological model. The scholars in ^[29] applied a novel fractional order Lagrangian scheme to show the motion of a beam on nanowire. Liaqat et al. ^[30], established a new scheme to obtain the approximate and exact solution in the sense of Caputo fractional partial differential equation along with variable. Odibat and Baleanu ^[31] studied a novel system of fractional differential equations involving generalized fractional Caputo operator. Different disease models have been investigated by researchers by using the fractional operators such as ^{[32,33,34,35,36]}. By using various operators to solve a variety of issues from the real world, significant work in the area of fractional calculus has been documented by numerous mathematicians and academics ^{[37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]}.

A novel operator for piecewise derivative and integrals was presented by Atangana and Araz ^[45]. The piecewise derivative is divided into two sub intervals: The first interval solution is found out in the sense of Caputo while the second intervals solution is under the ABC derivative. As the time of crossover behavior is not mentioned by the power or Mittag-Leffler law and therefore it is well defined in the piecewise derivative. In order to overcome these challenges, one of the unique ways of piecewise derivative has been proposed in ^[45]. A new window of cross-over behaviors using these operators has been studied by researchers. Several applications of the aforesaid fractional operators are investigated in the literature by different researchers ^{[46,47,48,49]}. Inspired by the above novel operator, we investigate the model taken from ^[19] under the framework of piecewise Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu operator as follows:

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{cases} {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{S}(t) = -(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{I}(t) = -(\epsilon+\zeta+\lambda)\mathbb{I}+(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{D}(t) = -(\eta+\rho)\mathbb{D}+\epsilon\mathbb{I}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{A}(t) = -(\theta+\mu+\kappa)\mathbb{A}+\zeta\mathbb{I}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{R}(t) = -(\nu+\xi)\mathbb{R}+\eta\mathbb{D}\theta\mathbb{A}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}{\mathbb{I}_r} = (\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}\\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}{\mathbb{T}} = -(\sigma+\tau)\mathbb{T}+\mu\mathbb{A}+\nu\mathbb{R}\\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}{\mathbb{H}_d} = \rho\mathbb{D}\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{T}\\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}{\mathbb{H}} = \lambda\mathbb{I}+\rho\mathbb{D}+\kappa\mathbb{A}+\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{A}\\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}{\mathbb{E}} = \tau\mathbb{T}. \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(1.2)

In more detail we can write Eq (1.2) as

$\begin{eqnarray} {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{S}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{S}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_{1}, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{S}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{D}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{D}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{D}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{A}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{A}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{A}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{R}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{R}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{R}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}_r(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}_r(t)) = ^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{I}_r(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(1.3)

$\begin{eqnarray} {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{T}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{T}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{T}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}_d(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}_d(t)) = ^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}_d(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{H}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ {^{CABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{E}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split}& {^{C}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{E}(t)) = ^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& {^{ABC}_0} {{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}(\mathbb{E}(t)) = ^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T. \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

We considered the dynamics in terms of piecewise fractional operators. The piecewise operators discuss the crossover and abrupt dynamics very well. Therefore, we treated the said model under the two fractional operators in different intervals. For each operator the qualitative analysis is provided on each subinterval. The UH stability is applied for stability analysis of the system. The system is investigated for approximate solution with the piecewise term and also the fractional parameters in the last expression of the system. This gives the choice for any dynamics of integer order as well as rational values.

2. Preliminaries

Here we present some definitions regarding Caputo and $ABC$ fractional as well as piecewise derivatives and also integrals.

Definition 2.1. The definition of ${ABC}$ operator of function ${\bf K}(t)$ with condition ${\bf K}(t)\in\mathcal{H}^1(0, T)$ is :

$\begin{eqnarray} ^{ABC}{_0 D}_{t}^\upsilon ({\bf K}(t)) = \frac{ABC(\upsilon)}{1-\upsilon}\int_0^t\frac{d}{d\vartheta}{\bf K}(\vartheta){E}_\upsilon\bigg[\frac{-\upsilon\bigg(t-\vartheta\bigg)^\upsilon}{1-\upsilon}\bigg]d\vartheta. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.1)

One can replace ${E}_\upsilon\bigg[\frac{-\upsilon}{1-\upsilon}\bigg(t-\vartheta\bigg)^{\vartheta}\bigg]$ by ${E}_1 = \exp\bigg[\frac{-\upsilon}{1-\upsilon}\bigg(t-\vartheta\bigg)\bigg]$ in (2.1) and obtain the Caputo-Fabrizio operator.

Definition 2.2. Consider ${\bf K}(t)\in P[0, T]$ , and then the $\mathbb{ABC}$ integral is:

$\begin{eqnarray} ^{{ABC}}{_0{I}}_{t}^\upsilon {\bf K}(t) = \frac{1-\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)}{\bf K}(t)+\frac{\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon) }\int_0^t {\bf K}(\vartheta)(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\vartheta. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.2)

Definition 2.3. The Caputo operator of function ${\bf K}(t)$ is

$\begin{eqnarray*} ^C_0{D}^\upsilon_t {\bf K}(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(1-\upsilon)}\int_0^t {\bf K}^{'}(\vartheta)(t-\vartheta)^{n-\upsilon-1}d\vartheta. \end{eqnarray*}$

Definition 2.4. Suppose ${\bf K}(t)$ is piecewise differentiable. Then, the piecewise derivative with Caputo and ABC operators ^[26] is

$\begin{eqnarray*} ^{PCABC}_{0}{D}_{t}^\upsilon {\bf K}(t) = \left\{\begin{split}& ^C_{0}{D}_{t}^\upsilon {\bf K}(t), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& ^{ABC}_{0}{D}_{t}^\upsilon {\bf K}(t) \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split} \right. \end{eqnarray*}$

where $^{PCABC}_{0}{D}_{t}^\upsilon$ represents piecewise differential operator, where Caputo operator is in interval $0 < t\leq t_1$ and $ABC$ operator in interval $t_1 < t\leq T$ .

Definition 2.5. Suppose ${\bf K}(t)$ is piecewise integrable, and then piecewise derivative with Caputo and ABC operators ^[26] is

$\begin{eqnarray*} ^{PCABC}_{0}{I}_{t}{\bf K}(t) = \left\{\begin{split}& \frac{1}{\Gamma{\upsilon}}\int_{t_1}^t {\bf K}(\vartheta)(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d(\vartheta), \ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{\upsilon}}{\bf K}(t)+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{\upsilon}\Gamma{\upsilon}}\int_{t_1}^t{\bf K}(\vartheta) (t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d(\vartheta) \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray*}$

where $^{PCABC}_{0}{I}_{t}^\upsilon$ represents piecewise integral operator, where Caputo operator is in interval $0 < t\leq t_1$ and $ABC$ operator in interval $t_1 < t\leq T$ .

3. Existence and uniqueness

The existence and the uniqueness results of the suggested model in the piecewise notion are found in this part. We shall now determine whether a solution exists for the hypothetical piecewise derivable function as well as its specific solution attribute. In order to do this, we may use the system (1.3) and can also write the following by way of more explanation:

$\begin{eqnarray*} ^{\mathrm{P}CABC}_0{{\bf D}}^\upsilon_t\mathcal{W}(t) = \mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t)), \ \ 0 < \upsilon\leq 1 \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{W}(t) = \left\{\begin{split}& \mathcal{W}_0+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^t \mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\vartheta, \ 0 < t\leq t_1\\& \mathcal{W}(t_1)+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t))+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_1}^t (t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d(\vartheta), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

where

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{W}(t) = \left\{\begin{split}& {\mathbb{S}}(t)\\& \mathbb{I}(t)\\& \mathbb{D}(t)\\& \mathbb{A}(t)\\& \mathbb{R}(t)\\& \mathbb{I}_r(t)\\& \mathbb{T}(t)\\& \mathbb{H}_d(t)\\& \mathbb{H}(t)\\& \mathbb{E}(t) \end{split} \right., \ \ \ \mathcal{W}_0 = \left\{\begin{split}& {\mathbb{S}}_0\\& \mathbb{I}_0\\& \mathbb{D}_0\\& \mathbb{A}_0\\& \mathbb{R}_0\\& \mathbb{I}_{r(0)}\\& \mathbb{T}_0\\& \mathbb{H}_{d(0)}\\& \mathbb{H}_0\\& \mathbb{E}_0 \end{split} \right., \ \ \ \mathcal{W}_{t_1} = \left\{\begin{split}& {\mathbb{S}}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{I}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{D}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{A}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{R}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{I}_{r(t_1)}\\& \mathbb{T}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{H}_{d(t_1)}\\& \mathbb{H}_{t_1}\\& \mathbb{E}_{t_1} \end{split} \right., \ \ \ \mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t)) = \left\{\begin{split} {\mho}_i = \left\{\begin{split}& ^{C}{\mho}_i(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t)\\& ^{ABC}{\mho}_i(\mathbb{S}, \mathbb{I}, \mathbb{D}, \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{I}_r, \mathbb{T}, \mathbb{H}_d, \mathbb{H}, \mathbb{E}, t) \end{split} \right. \end{split} \right., \end{equation}$

(3.2)

where $i = 1, 2, 3..., 10.$ Take $0 < t\leq \mathbb{T} < \infty$ and the Banach space ${E}_1 = {C}[0, \mathbb{T}]$ with a norm

$\|\mathcal{W}\| = \max\limits_{t\in [0, \mathbb{T}]}|\mathcal{W}(t)|.$

We assume the following growth condition:

${\bf{(C1)}}$ $\exists$ $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{W}} > 0$ ; $\forall$ $\mathcal{N}, \ \bar{\mathcal{W}}\in {E}$ we have

$|\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W})-\mathcal{N}(t, \bar{\mathcal{W}})|\leq \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{N}}|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}|,$

${\bf{(C2)}}$ $\exists$ $C_{\mathcal{N}} > 0$ & $M_{\mathcal{N}} > 0,$ ;

$|\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t))|\leq C_{\mathcal{N}}|\mathcal{W}|+M_{\mathcal{N}}.$

If $\mathcal{N}$ is piece-wise continuous on $(0, t_1]$ and $[t_1, T]$ on $[0, \mathcal{T}]$ , also satisfying $(C2)$ , then (1.3) has $\geq 1$ solution.

Proof. Let us use the Schauder theorem to define a closed sub-set as $\mathfrak{B}$ and $E$ in both subintervals of $[0, \mathscr{L}]$ .

${B} = \{\mathcal{W}\in {E}:\ \|\mathcal{W}\|\leq {R}_{1, 2}, \ {R}_{1, 2} > 0\},$

Suppose $\mathscr{L}: \mathfrak{B} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$ and using (4.8) as

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W}) = \left\{\begin{split}& \mathcal{W}_0+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{\mathrm{t}_1} \mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))(\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\vartheta, \ 0 < \mathrm{t}\leq \mathrm{t}_1\\& \mathcal{W}(\mathrm{t}_1)+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\mathcal{N}(\mathrm{t}, \mathcal{W}(\mathrm{t}))+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{\mathrm{t}_1}^\mathrm{t} (\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d(\vartheta), \ \ \mathrm{t}_1 < \mathrm{t}\leq T. \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

Any $\mathcal{W}\in {B}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{p6} |\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(t)|&\leq& \left\{\begin{split}& |\mathcal{W}_0|+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{\mathrm{t}_1} (\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}|\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d\vartheta, \\& |\mathcal{W}_(t_1)|+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}|\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t))|+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{\mathrm{t}_1}^\mathrm{t} (\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}|\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d(\vartheta), \end{split}\right.\\ &\leq& \left\{\begin{split}& |\mathcal{W}_0|+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{\mathrm{t}_1} (\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon -1}[C_\mathcal{N} |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}]d\upsilon, \\& |\mathcal{W}_(\mathrm{t}_1)|+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}[C_\mathcal{N} |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}]+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{\mathrm{t}_1}^\mathrm{t} (\mathrm{t}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}[C_\mathcal{N} |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}]d(\upsilon), \end{split}\right.\\ &\leq& \left\{\begin{split}& |\mathcal{W}_0|+\frac{{\bf T}^\upsilon}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}[C_H |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}] = R_1, \ 0 < \mathrm{t}\leq \mathrm{t}_1, \\& |\mathcal{W}_(t_1)|+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}[C_\mathcal{N} |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}]+\frac{\upsilon (T-{\bf T})^\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma{(\upsilon) +1}}[C_\mathcal{N} |\mathcal{W}|+M_\mathcal{N}]d(\upsilon) = R_2, \ \mathrm{t}_1 < \mathrm{t}\leq T, \end{split}\right.\\ &\leq& \left\{\begin{split}& R_1, \ 0 < \mathrm{t}\leq \mathrm{t}_1, \\& R_2, \ \mathrm{t}_1 < \mathrm{t}\leq T. \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray*}$

As determined by the previous equation, $\mathcal{W}\in {{\bf B}}$ . Therefore, $\mathscr{L}({{\bf B}})\subset {{\bf B}}$ . Thus, it demonstrates that $\mathscr{L}$ is closed and complete. In order to further demonstrate the complete continuity, we also write by using $\mathrm{t}_i < \mathrm{t}_j \in [0, \mathrm{t}_1]$ as the initial interval in the sense of Caputo, consider

$\begin{eqnarray} |\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(\mathrm{t}_j)-\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(\mathrm{t}_i)|& = &\bigg |\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{\mathrm{t}_j} (\mathrm{t}_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1} \mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d\vartheta-\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{t_i}(\mathrm{t}_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d\vartheta\bigg|\\ &\leq& \frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^{t_i} [(t_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}-(\mathrm{t}_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}] |\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d\vartheta\\ &+&\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_i}^{t_j} (t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}|\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d\vartheta\\ &\leq&\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon )}\bigg[\int_0^{t_i}[(t_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}-(t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}]d\vartheta +\int_{t_i}^{t_j} (t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\vartheta\bigg](C_{H}|\mathcal{W}|+M_{\mathcal{N}})\\ &\leq&\frac{(C_{\mathcal{N}}\mathcal{W}+M_{\mathcal{N}})}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}[t_j^{\vartheta}-t_i^\upsilon+2(t_j-t_i)^\upsilon]. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.4)

Next (3.4), we obtain $t_i\rightarrow t_j$ , and then

$|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(t_j)-\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(t_i)|\rightarrow 0, \ \text{as}\ t_i\rightarrow t_j.$

So, $\mathscr{L}$ is equi-continuous in $[0, t_1]$ . Consider $t_i, t_j \in [t_1, T]$ in $ABC$ sense as

$\begin{eqnarray} |\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(t_j)-\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(\mathrm{t}_i)|& = &\bigg |\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t))+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_1}^{\mathrm{t}_j} (\mathrm{t}_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1} \mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d\vartheta, \\ &-&\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\mathcal{N}(t, \mathcal{W}(t))+\frac{(\upsilon)}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{\mathrm{t}_1}^{\mathrm{t}_i} (\mathrm{t}_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d\vartheta\bigg|\\ &\leq& \frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_1}^{t_i} [(t_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}-(t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}] |\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d\vartheta\\ &+&\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_i}^{t_j} (t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}|\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))|d\vartheta\\ &\leq&\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\bigg[\int_{t_1}^{t_i}[(t_i-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}-(t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}]d\vartheta\\ &+&\int_{t_i}^{t_j} (t_j-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\upsilon\bigg](C_{\mathcal{N}}|\mathcal{W}|+M_{\mathcal{N}})\\ &\leq&\frac{\upsilon(C_{\mathcal{N}}\mathcal{W}+M_{\mathcal{N}})}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}[t_j^\upsilon-t_i^\upsilon+2(t_j-t_i)^\upsilon]. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

If $t_i\rightarrow \mathrm{t}_j$ , then

$|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(\mathrm{t}_j)-\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})(t_i)|\rightarrow 0, \ \text{as}\ t_i\rightarrow t_j.$

So, the operator $\mathscr{L}$ shows its equi-continuity in $[\mathrm{t}_1, T]$ . Thus, $\mathscr{L}$ is an equi-continuous map. Based on the Arzelà-Ascoli result, $\mathscr{L}$ is continuous (completely), uniformly continuous, and bounded. The Schauder result shows that problem (1.3) has at least one solution in the subintervals.

Further, if $\mathscr{L}$ is a contraction mapping with $(C1)$ , then the suggested system has unique solution. As $\mathscr{L}: {{\bf B}}\rightarrow {{\bf B}}$ is piece-wise continuous, consider $\mathcal{W}$ and $\bar{\mathcal{W}} \in {B}$ on $[0, t_1]$ in the sense of Caputo as

$\begin{eqnarray} \|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})-\mathscr{L}(\bar{\mathcal{W}})\|& = &\max\limits_{t\in [0, t_1]}\bigg|\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^t (t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \mathcal{W}(\vartheta))d\vartheta- \frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^t (t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\mathcal{N}(\vartheta, \bar{\mathcal{W}}(\vartheta))d\vartheta\bigg|\\ &\leq& \frac{{\bf T}^\upsilon}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}L_\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}\|. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.6)

From (3.6), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})-\mathscr{L}(\bar{\mathcal{W}})\|\leq \frac{{\bf T}^\upsilon}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}L_\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}\|. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.7)

As a result, $\mathscr{L}$ is a contraction. As a result, the issue under consideration has only one solution in the provided sub interval in light of the Banach result. Also $\mathrm{t}\in[\mathrm{t}_1, T]$ in the sense of the $ABC$ derivative as

$\begin{eqnarray} \|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})-\mathscr{L}(\bar{\mathcal{W}})\|\leq \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}L_\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}\|+\frac{\upsilon({{\bf T}-T}^\upsilon)}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}L_{\mho}\|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}\|. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} \|\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{W})-\mathscr{L}(\bar{\mathcal{W}})\|\leq L_\mathcal{N}\bigg[\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}+\frac{\upsilon(T-{\bf T})^\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\bigg]\|\mathcal{W}-\bar{\mathcal{W}}\|. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

This is why $\mathscr{L}$ is a contraction. As a result, the issue under consideration has a singleton solution in the provided sub interval in light of the Banach result. So, with (3.7) and (3.9), the suggested problem has unique solution on each sub-interval.

4. Stability analysis

Here, we prove the H-U stability and different forms for our considered model.

Definition 4.1. Our proposed model (1.1) is U-H stable, if for each $\alpha > 0$ , and the inequality

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|^{PCABC}{\bf D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)-{\mho}(t, \Theta(t))\right| < \alpha, for\; \; all, t\in\mathcal{T}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

unique solution $\overline{\Theta}\in Z$ exists with a constant $\mathcal{H} > 0$ ,

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}\alpha, for\; \; all, t\in\mathcal{T}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.2)

In addition, if we take the increasing function $\Phi:[0, \infty)\rightarrow R^{+}$ , then the above inequality can be written as

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}\Phi(\alpha), at\; every, t\in\mathcal{T}, \end{eqnarray*}$

if $\Phi(0) = 0$ , then the obtained solution is generalized U-H stable.

Definition 4.2. Our considered model 1.2 is U-H Rassias stable if, $\Psi:[0, \infty)\rightarrow R^{+}$ , for each $\alpha > 0$ , and inequality

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|^{PCABC}{\bf D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)-{\mho}(t, \Theta(t))\right| < \alpha \Psi(t), for\; all, t\in\mathcal{T}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

unique solution $\overline{\Theta}\in Z$ with constant $\mathcal{H}_{\Psi} > 0$ , so that

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}_{\Psi}\alpha\Psi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

If $\Psi:[0, \infty)\rightarrow R^{+}$ is exist, for the above inequality, then

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|^{PCABC}{\bf D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)-{\mho}(t, \Theta(t))\right| < \Psi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

then there exist a unique solution $\overline{\Theta}\in Z$ with constant $\mathcal{H}_{\Psi} > 0$ , such that

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}_{\Psi}\Psi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

then the obtained solution is generalized U-H Rassias stable.

Remark 1. Suppose a function $\phi\in C(\mathcal{T})$ does not depend upon $\Theta\in\mathcal{Z}$ , and $\phi(0) = 0$ . Then,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c4} \left|\phi(t)\right|&\leq&\alpha, t\in \mathcal{T}\\ ^{PCABC}{\bf D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)& = &{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right)+\phi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Lemma 4.2.1. Consider the function

$\begin{eqnarray} ^{PCABC}_0{{\bf D}}^\varrho_t \Theta(t) = {\mho}(t, \Theta(t)), \ \ 0 < \varrho\leq 1. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

The solution of (4.7) is

$\begin{eqnarray} \Theta(t) = \left\{\begin{split}& \Theta_0+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_0^t {\mho}(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta))(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}d\vartheta, \ 0 < t\leq t_1\\& \Theta(t_1)+\frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{\mho}(t, \Theta(t))+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_1}^t (t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta))d(\vartheta), \ \ t_1 < t\leq T, \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|F(\Theta)-F(\overline{\Theta})\right|\right|\leq\left\{\begin{split}& \frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\alpha, t\in\mathcal{T}_{1}\\& \left[\frac{(1-\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}+(T_{2}^{\upsilon})}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\right]\alpha = \Lambda\alpha, t\in\mathcal{T}_{2}. \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Theorem 1. In light of lemma (4.2.1), if the condition $\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{T}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma(\upsilon)} < 1$ holds, then the solution of our considered model (1.2) is H-U as well as generalized H-U stable.

Proof. Suppose $\Theta\in Z$ is the solution of (1.2), and $\overline{\Theta}\in Z$ is a unique solution of (1.2). Then we have

Case:1 for $t\in\mathcal{T}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{split}& \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right| = \sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left|\Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\& \leq\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| \Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\& +\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| +\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta-\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right|\\& \leq\frac{\mathcal{{T}_{1}}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}\alpha+\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{{T}_{1}}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|. \end{split} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

On further simplification

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right| &\leq&\left(\frac{\frac{\mathcal{{T}_{1}}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}{1-\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{{T}_{1}}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}\right)\alpha \end{eqnarray}$

(4.11)

Case:2

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right| &\leq&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left|\Theta-\left[\Theta(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)}\left[{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right), \right] \right.\right.\\ &+&\left.\left.\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\left[\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta) \right)d(\vartheta)\right]\right]\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\frac{1-\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)}\left|{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right) -{\mho}\left(t, \overline{\Theta}(t), \right)\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\frac{\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\left|{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta)\right) -{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)\right|ds. \end{eqnarray*}$

By further simplification and using $\Lambda = \left[\frac{(1-\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)+T_{2}^{\upsilon}}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\right],$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\Lambda\alpha+\Lambda{L_{f}}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.12)

We have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\left(\frac{\Lambda}{1-\frac{\Lambda} {L_{f}}}\right)\alpha\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}. \end{eqnarray*}$

we use

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{H} = \max\left\{\left(\frac{\frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}{1-\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}\right), \frac{\Lambda}{1-\frac{\Lambda L_{f}}{1-M_{f}}}\right\} \end{eqnarray*}$

Now, from Eqs (4.11) and (4.12), we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c33} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}\alpha, at\; \; each\; t\in \mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Therefore, the solution of model (1.2) is H-U stable. Also, if we replace $\alpha$ by $\Phi(\alpha)$ , then from (4.13),

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c34} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}\Phi(\alpha), at\; \; each\; t\in \mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now, $\Phi(0) = 0$ shows that the solution of our proposed model (1.2) is generalized H-U stable.

We give the following remark to conclude the Rassias stability results and also the generalized form.

Remark 2. Suppose a function $\phi\in C(\mathcal{T})$ does not depend upon $\Theta\in\mathcal{Z}$ , and $\phi(0) = 0$ . Then,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c44} \left|\phi(t)\right|&\leq&\Psi(t)\alpha, t\in \mathcal{T}\\ ^{PCABC}\mathcal{D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)& = &{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right)+\phi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}\\ \int_{0}^{t}\Psi(\vartheta)ds&\leq& C_{\Psi}\Psi(t), t\in \mathcal{T}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Lemma 4.2.2. Solution to the model

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c5} ^{PCABC}\mathcal{D}_{t}^{\upsilon}\Theta(t)& = &{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right)+\phi(t), \\ \Theta(0) = \Theta_{\circ}, \end{eqnarray*}$

hold the relation given below:

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|F(\Theta)-F(\overline{\Theta})\right|\right|\leq\left\{\begin{split}& \frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}C_{\Psi}\Psi(t)\alpha, t\in\mathcal{T}_{1}\\& \left[\frac{(1-\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}+(T_{2}^{\upsilon})}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\right]C_{\Psi}\Psi(t)\alpha = \Lambda C_{\Psi}\Psi(t)\alpha, t\in\mathcal{T}_{2}. \end{split}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.13)

where $\mathcal{H}_{f, \Psi, \Lambda} = \Lambda\mathcal{H}_{f, \Psi}$ .

With the help of remark 2, one can get Eq (4.7).

Theorem 2. The solution of model (4.13) is H-U-R stable if the following conditions hold:

$\left.H_{1}\right)$ For each $\Theta, v\in\mathcal{Z}$ and a constant $C_{\Phi} > 0$ , we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\Phi(\Theta)-\Phi(v)\right|\leq C_{\Phi}\left|\Theta-v\right|, \end{eqnarray*}$

$\left.H_{2}\right)$ For each $\Theta, v, \overline{\Theta}, \overline{v}\in\mathcal{Z}$ and constant $L_{f} > 0, 0 < M_{f} < 1$ , we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|{\mho}(t, \Theta, v)-{\mho}(t, \overline{\Theta}, \overline{v})\right|\leq L_{f}\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|+M_{f}\left|v-\overline{v}\right| \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} M_{f}& < &1. \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. We prove these results in two cases.

Case:1 for $t\in\mathcal{T}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|& = &\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left|\Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\ &\leq&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| \Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| +\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right.\\ &-&\left.\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right|\\ &\leq&\frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\alpha+\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{{T}_{1}}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|. \end{eqnarray*}$

On further simplification

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right| &\leq&\left(\frac{C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}{1-\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}\right)\alpha \end{eqnarray}$

(4.14)

Case:2

By further simplification and using $\Lambda = \left[\frac{(1-\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)+T_{2}^{\upsilon}}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\right],$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\Lambda C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\alpha+\Lambda{L_{f}}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.15)

We have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\left(\frac{\Lambda C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)}{1-\frac{\Lambda} {L_{f}}}\right)\alpha\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}. \end{eqnarray*}$

We use

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{H}_{\Lambda, C_{\Phi}} = \max\left\{\left(\frac{\frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}{1-\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{T}_{1}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}}\right), \frac{C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\Lambda}{1-\frac{\Lambda L_{f}}{1-M_{f}}}\right\} \end{eqnarray*}$

Now, from Eqs (4.14) and (4.15), we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{c3} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}_{\Lambda, C_{\Phi}}\alpha, at\; \; each\; t\in \mathcal{T} \end{eqnarray*}$

So, the solution of model (1.2) is H-U-R stable.

Remark 3. Suppose a function $\phi\in C(\mathcal{T})$ does not depend upon $\Theta\in\mathcal{Z}$ , and $\phi(0) = 0$ ; then,

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\phi(t)\right|\leq\Psi(t), t\in\mathcal{T}; \end{eqnarray*}$

Theorem 3. In light of $H_{1}$ , $H_{2}$ , Remark 3 and 2, the solution of model 1.2 is generalized H-U-R stable, if $M_{f} < 1$ .

Where

$\left.H_{1}\right)$ For each $\Theta, v\in\mathcal{Z}$ and constant $C_{\Phi} > 0$ , we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\Phi(\Theta)-\Phi(v)\right|\leq C_{\Phi}\left|\Theta-v\right| \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\left.H_{2}\right)$ For each $\Theta, v, \overline{\Theta}, \overline{v}\in\mathcal{Z}$ and constant $L_{f} > 0, 0 < M_{f} < 1$ , we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|{\mho}(t, \Theta, v)-{\mho}(t, \overline{\Theta}, \overline{v})\right|\leq L_{f}\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|+M_{f}\left|v-\overline{v}\right| \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. We obtained our results in two cases:

Case 1: for $t\in\mathcal{T}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|& = &\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| \Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\ &\leq&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| \Theta-\left(\Theta_{\circ}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right)\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left| +\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta-\frac{1}{\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t_{1}-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)d\vartheta\right|\\ &\leq&\frac{\mathcal{T}_{1}^{\upsilon}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\alpha+\frac{L_{f}\mathcal{{T}_{1}}}{\Gamma(\upsilon+1)}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right|. \end{eqnarray*}$

On further simplification

(4.16)

Case 2:

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline{\Theta}\right|\right| &\leq&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\left|\Theta-\left[\Theta(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)}\left[{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right) \right] \right.\right.\\ &+&\left.\left.\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\left[\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta) \right)d(\vartheta)\right]\right]\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\frac{1-\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)}\left|{\mho}\left(t, \Theta(t)\right) -{\mho}\left(t, \overline{\Theta}(t), \right)\right|\\ &+&\sup\limits_{t\in\mathcal{T}}\frac{\upsilon}{{ABC}(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\vartheta)^{\upsilon-1}\left|{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \Theta(\vartheta)\right) -{\mho}\left(\vartheta, \overline{\Theta}(\vartheta)\right)\right|ds. \end{eqnarray*}$

By further simplification and using $\Lambda = \left[\frac{(1-\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)+T_{2}^{\upsilon}}{ABC(\upsilon)\Gamma(\upsilon)}\right],$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\Lambda C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)\alpha+\Lambda{L_{f}}\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.17)

We have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\left(\frac{\Lambda C_{\Phi}\Phi(t)}{1-\Lambda L_{f}}\right)\left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}. \end{eqnarray*}$

We use

Now, from Eqs (4.16) and (4.17), we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left|\left|\Theta-\overline\Theta\right|\right|_{Z}\leq\mathcal{H}_{\Lambda, C_{\Phi}}, at\; \; each\; t\in \mathcal{T} \end{eqnarray*}$

So the solution of the model (1.2) is generalized H-U-R stable.

5. Numerical Scheme for the fractional piecewise COVID-19 model

In this section we derive the numerical scheme for the following Covid-19 model (1.2).

$\begin{eqnarray} \begin{cases} {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{S}(t) = -(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{I}(t) = -(\epsilon+\zeta+\lambda)\mathbb{I}+(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{D}(t) = -(\eta+\rho)\mathbb{D}+\epsilon\mathbb{I}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{A}(t) = -(\theta+\mu+\kappa)\mathbb{A}+\zeta\mathbb{I}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{R}(t) = -(\nu+\xi)\mathbb{R}+\eta\mathbb{D}\theta\mathbb{A}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{I}_r(t) = (\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{T}(t) = -(\sigma+\tau)\mathbb{T}+\mu\mathbb{A}+\nu\mathbb{R}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{H}_d(t) = \rho\mathbb{D}\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{T}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{H}(t) = \lambda\mathbb{I}+\rho\mathbb{D}+\kappa\mathbb{A}+\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{A}, \\ {_0^{PCABC}}{{\bf D}_t^{\upsilon}}\mathbb{E}(t) = \tau\mathbb{T}, \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(5.1)

By applying the piece-wise integral to the Caputo and AB derivative, we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{S}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{S}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{S}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}+ \frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{I}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{I}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{I}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases}\\ \mathbb{D}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{D}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{D})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{D}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{D})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{D})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{A}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{A}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{A}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{R}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{R}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{R}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{I}_r(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{I}_r(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{I}_r(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{T}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{T}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{T}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{H}_d(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{H}_d(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{H}_d(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{H}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{H}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{H}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \\ \mathbb{E}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{E}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{E}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \end{eqnarray}$

(5.2)

At $t = t_{n+1}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathbb{S}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{S}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{S}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}+ \frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{1}(t, \mathbb{S})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{I}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{I}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{I}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{2}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases}\\ \mathbb{D}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{D}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{I})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{D}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{D})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{3}(t, \mathbb{D})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{A}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{A}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{A}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{4}(t, \mathbb{A})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{R}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{R}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{R}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{5}(t, \mathbb{R})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{I}_r(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{I}_r(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{I}_r(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{6}(t, \mathbb{I}_r)d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{T}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{T}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{T}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{7}(t, \mathbb{T})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{H}_d(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{H}_d(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{H}_d(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{8}(t, \mathbb{H}_d)d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{H}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{H}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{H}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{9}(t, \mathbb{H})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber\\ \mathbb{E}(t)& = &\begin{cases} \mathbb{E}(0)+\frac{1}{\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{0}^{t_{1}}(t-\rho)^{{\upsilon-1}{c}}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho}\ \ 0 < t\leq t_1, \\ \mathbb{E}(t_{1})+\frac{1-\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho} +\frac{\upsilon}{AB(\upsilon)\Gamma{(\upsilon)}}\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{n+1}}(t-\rho)^{\upsilon-1}{\mho}_{10}(t, \mathbb{E})d{\rho}\ \ t_1 < t\leq T \end{cases} \nonumber \end{eqnarray*}$

We put the Newton polynomials, so we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{\mathbb{S}}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{ \begin{aligned}& \mathbb{\mathbb{S}}_0+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta{t})^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi+\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_1( \mathbb{S}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})+^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & {\mathbb{S}}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_1( \mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_1( \mathbb{S}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.3)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{I}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{I}_0+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta{t})^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi+\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_2( \mathbb{I}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{I}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_2( \mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_2( \mathbb{I}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.4)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{D}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{D}_0+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_3( \mathbb{D}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{D}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_3( \mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_3( \mathbb{D}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.5)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{A}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{A}_0+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_4( \mathbb{A}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right.\\ & \mathbb{\mathbb{A}}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_4( \mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_4( \mathbb{A}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta. \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{R}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{R}_0+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_5( \mathbb{R}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{R}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_5( \mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_5( \mathbb{R}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.7)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{I}_r(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{I}_r(0)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_6( \mathbb{I}_r^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{I}_r(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_6( \mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_6( \mathbb{I}_r^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{T}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{T}(0)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_7( \mathbb{T}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right.\\ & \mathbb{T}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_7( \mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_7( \mathbb{T}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.9)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{H}_d(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{H}_d(0)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_8( \mathbb{H}_d^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{H}_d(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_8( \mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_8( \mathbb{H}_d^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.10)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{H}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{H}(0)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_9( \mathbb{H}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{H}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_9( \mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_9( \mathbb{H}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.11)

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbb{E}(t_{n+1}) = \left\{\begin{aligned}& \mathbb{E}(0)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi +\frac{(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1})-^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon(\Delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{2\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = 2}^i\bigg[^C{\mho}_{10}( \mathbb{E}^{\bf k}, t_{\bf k})-2^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \\ & \mathbb{E}(t_1)+\left\{\begin{aligned}& \frac{1-\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}{^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^n, t_n)}+\frac{\upsilon}{ABC(\upsilon)}\frac{(\delta t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+1)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n \bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}( \mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Pi\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+2)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) +{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\bigwedge\\& +\frac{\upsilon}{ABC{(\upsilon)}}\frac{\upsilon(\upsilon t)^{\upsilon-1}}{\Gamma{(\upsilon+3)}}\sum\limits_{{\bf k} = i+3}^n\bigg[^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}}, t_{{\bf k}}) -2^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-1}, t_{{\bf k}-1}) + ^{ABC}{\mho}_{10}( \mathbb{E}^{{\bf k}-2}, t_{{\bf k}-2})\bigg]\Delta \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(5.12)

Here

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Pi = \left[\begin{split}& (1-{\bf k}+n)^\upsilon\bigg(2(-{\bf k}+n)^2+(3\upsilon+10)(-{\bf k}+n)+2\upsilon^2+9\upsilon+12\bigg)\\& -(-{\bf k}+n)\bigg(2(-{\bf k}+n)^2+(5\upsilon+10)(n-{\bf k})+6\upsilon^2+18\upsilon+12\bigg) \end{split}\right], \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} \bigwedge = \left[\begin{split}& (1-{\bf k}+n)^\upsilon\bigg(3+n+2\upsilon-{\bf k}\bigg)\\& -(-{\bf k}+n)\bigg(n+3\upsilon-{\bf k}+3\bigg) \end{split}\right], \end{eqnarray*}$

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Delta = \left[\begin{split}& (1-{\bf k}+n)^\upsilon-(-{\bf k}+n)^\upsilon \end{split}\right], \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \label{2} \begin{array}{l} ^C{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_1(\mathbb{S}, t)} = -(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ ^C{\mho}_3(\mathbb{I}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_3(\mathbb{I}, t)} = -(\epsilon+\zeta+\lambda)\mathbb{I}+(\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ ^C{\mho}_2(\mathbb{A}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_2(\mathbb{A}, t)} = -(\eta+\rho)\mathbb{D}+\epsilon\mathbb{I}, \\ ^C{\mho}_4(\mathbb{D}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_4(\mathbb{D}, t)} = -(\theta+\mu+\kappa)\mathbb{A}+\zeta\mathbb{I}, \\ ^C{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{R}, t)} = -(\nu+\xi)\mathbb{R}+\eta\mathbb{D}\theta\mathbb{A}, \\ ^C{\mho}_6(\mathbb{I}_r, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{I}_r, t)} = (\alpha\mathbb{I}+\beta\mathbb{D}+\gamma\mathbb{A}+\delta\mathbb{R})\mathbb{S}, \\ ^C{\mho}_7(\mathbb{T}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{T}, t)} = -(\sigma+\tau)\mathbb{T}+\mu\mathbb{A}+\nu\mathbb{R}, \\ ^C{\mho}_8(\mathbb{H}_d, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{H}_d, t)} = \rho\mathbb{D}\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{T}, \\ ^C{\mho}_9(\mathbb{H}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{H}, t)} = \lambda\mathbb{I}+\rho\mathbb{D}+\kappa\mathbb{A}+\xi\mathbb{R}+\sigma\mathbb{A}, \\ ^C{\mho}_{10}(\mathbb{E}, t) = {^{ABC}{\mho}_5(\mathbb{E}, t)} = \tau\mathbb{T}. \end{array} \end{eqnarray*}$

The above Eqs (5.3)–(5.12) are the solution for the considered model.

6. Numerical simulations

In this section we provide the numerical simulation for all the five compartments of the proposed model using the initial data and parameters values taken from ^[19]. The initial populations are $\mathbb{S}(0) = 1, \ \mathbb{I}(0) = 0.001, \ \mathbb{D}(0) = 0.002, \ \mathbb{A}(0) = 0.0001, \ \mathbb{R}(0) = 0.0003,$ $\mathbb{I}_r(0) = 0.0009, \ \mathbb{T}(0) = 0.002, \mathbb{H}_d(0) = 0.003, \ \mathbb{H}(0) = 0.00012, \ \mathbb{E}(0) = 0.00014$ .

Table 2. Parameters values in model 1.1.

Parameter	Value	Parameter	Values
$\alpha$	$0.57$	$\beta$	$0.0114$
$\gamma$	$0.456$	$\delta$	$0.0114$
$\epsilon$	$0.171$	$\theta$	$0.3705$
$\zeta$	$0.1254$	$\eta_1$	$0.1254$
$\mu$	$0.0171$	$v$	$0.0274$
$\tau$	$0.01$	$\lambda$	$0.0342$
$\kappa$	$0.0342$	$\xi$	$0.0171$
$\sigma$	$0.0171$	$\rho$	$0.0171$

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

The graphical representation of all the ten compartments of the analyzed model has been shown on three different data of fractional orders and time durations in the sense of piecewise Caputo and ABC derivatives. The first compartment of susceptible population is shown in Figure 1a–c, respectively, on two sub intervals. The said class population decreases slowly in the first interval, while in the second interval it decreases very abruptly. On small fractional orders it is stable quickly, and piece wise behaviors are negligible in this case, as shown in Figure 1a, c.

Figure 1. Dynamical behaviors of susceptible individuals

$\mathbb{S}(t)$ on different arbitrary fractional orders

$\upsilon$ and time durations on sub interval

$[0, t_1]$ and

$[t_1, T]$ of

$[0, T]$ .

[1]	Road traffic safety (2017) In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Road_traffic_safety&oldid=783832588
[2]	Vehicle safety communications project final report HS-810-591. US Department of Transortation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2006, pp. 1-10.
[3]	IEEE Standard 802.11p: IEEE standard for information technology telecommunications and information exchange between systems local and metropolitan area networks specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications; Amendment 6: Wireless access in vehicular environments, 2010.
[4]	Cailean AM, Cagneau B, Chassagne L, et al. (2014) A survey on the usage of DSCR and VLC in communication-based vehicle safety applications. Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT), 69-74
[5]	Abuelsamid S (2016) New cars could be required to talk to each other as soon as 2020. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/samabuelsamid/2016/12/13/nhtsa-finally-issues-draft-v2v-communications-rule-could-be-mandatory-from-2021
[6]	Farquhar P (2016) There's one major obstacle to a driverless car future that tech can't solve -- and that's you. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com.au/theres-one-major-obstacle-to-a-driverless-car-future-that-tech-cant-solve-and-thats-you-2016-12
[7]	Nellore K, Hancke GP (2016) A survey on urban traffic management system using wireless sensor networks. Sensors 16: 1-25.
[8]	Zhao J, Cao G (2008) VADD: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE T Veh Technol 57: 1910-1922.
[9]	Skordylis A, Trigoni N (2008) Delay-bounded routing in vehicular ad-hoc networks'. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 341-350.
[10]	Ding Y, Wang C, Xiao L (2007) A static-node assisted adaptive routing protocol in vehicular networks. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, 59-68.
[11]	Jeong J, Guo S, Gu Y, et al. (2009) TBD: Trajectory-based data forwarding for light-traffic vehicular networks. Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 231-238.
[12]	Jeong J, Guo S, Gu Y, et al. (2010) TSF: Trajectory-based statistical forwarding for infrastructure-to-vehicle data delivery in vehicular networks. Proceedins of the 30th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 557-566.
[13]	Kenney JB (2011) Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the united states. P IEEE 99: 1162-1182.
[14]	Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2: 483-502.
[15]	Carter A (2005) The status of vehicle-to-vehicle communication as a means of improving crash prevention performance. Tech. Rep. 05-0264.
[16]	Eze EC, Zhang S, Liu E (2014) Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): Current state, challenges, potentials and way forward. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Automation and Computing, 176-181.
[17]	Máttyus G, Luo W, Urtasun R (2017) DeepRoadMapper: Extracting road topology from aerial images. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 3458-3466.
[18]	Wu H, Fujimoto R, Guensler R, et al. (2004) MDDV: A mobility-centric data dissemination algorithm for vehicular networks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicle Ad Hoc Network, 47-56.
[19]	Khan F, Nguang SK (2020) Location-based data delivery between vehicles and infrastructure. IET Intell Transp Sy 14: 288-296.
[20]	Khan F, Nguang SK (2017) LRF: Location-based reverse forwarding for infrastructure-to-vehicle data delivery. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, 32-36.
[21]	Li Y, Shi X, Lindgren A, et al. (2018) Context-aware data dissemination for ICN-based vehicular ad hoc networks. Information 9: 263.
[22]	Zhang L, Afanasyev A, Burke J, et al. (2014) Named Data Networking. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 44: 66-73.
[23]	Xu Y, Tong S, Zhang T, et al. (2020) Compass: Directing named data transmission in VANETs by dynamic directional interfaces. IEEE Access 8: 8418-8435.
[24]	Ahed K, Benamar M, Lahcen AA, et al. (2020) Forwarding strategies in vehicular named data networks: A survey. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences.
[25]	Boukerche A, Coutinho R (2019) LoIcen: A novel location-based and information-centric architecture for content distribution in vehicular networks. Ad Hoc Networks 93: 101899.
[26]	Boukerche A, Coutinho R, Yu X (2017) LISIC: A link stability based protocol for vehicular information-centric networks. IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), 233-240.
[27]	Coutinho R, Boukerche A, Yu X (2018) A novel location-based content distribution protocol for vehicular named-data networks. IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 01007-01012.
[28]	Sousa M, Arajo FR, Sampaio L (2018) A link-stability based interest-forwarding strategy for vehicular named data networks. IEEE Internet Comput 22: 16-26.

1.	Sara Salem Alzaid, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Real-world validation of fractional-order model for COVID-19 vaccination impact, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 3685, 10.3934/math.2024181
2.	Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Sara Salem Alzaid, Studying the Dynamics of the Rumor Spread Model with Fractional Piecewise Derivative, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1537, 10.3390/sym15081537
3.	Hardik Joshi, Mechanistic insights of COVID-19 dynamics by considering the influence of neurodegeneration and memory trace, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 035254, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad2ad0
4.	Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Farman, Khadija Jamil, Ali Akgul, Saba Jamil, Onder Tutsoy, Computational and stability analysis of Ebola virus epidemic model with piecewise hybrid fractional operator, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0298620, 10.1371/journal.pone.0298620

AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering

Location-based reverse data delivery between infrastructure and vehicles

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Existence and uniqueness

4. Stability analysis

5. Numerical Scheme for the fractional piecewise COVID-19 model

6. Numerical simulations

7. Sensitivity of parameters

8. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Existence and uniqueness

4. Stability analysis

5. Numerical Scheme for the fractional piecewise COVID-19 model

6. Numerical simulations

7. Sensitivity of parameters

8. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References