Over the last decade, the European Union has developed objectives at a strategic level that seek to improve sustainability and circularity across all aspects of production and consumption. More recently, the Green Deal and Circular Economy Action Plan, have applied a specific focus on the production, use and disposal of plastics, where solutions that address the issues posed by traditional petroleum-based plastics have been sought. As a response to this strategic shift, the utilization of bioplastics (namely bio-based and/or biodegradable plastics) has been promoted as a potential solution, whereby they can substitute, or provide an alternative to, traditional petroleum-based plastics. However, successful uptake and the effective waste management of bioplastics, and products that utilize bioplastics, will be based on the consumer experience and ultimately market acceptance. This study explores three factors that may influence the consumer experience when purchasing, using, and disposing of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: consumer confusion, unrealistic expectations, and the value-action gap. Based on qualitative evidence gathered across the academic literature, this mini review suggests that all three aspects (both individually and combined) can have a marked effect on the uptake of bioplastics, and indeed other sustainable options. Indeed, when these potential impacts are considered in the broader context of a circular economy, it is suggested that feelings of cynicism and skepticism, along with unintended rebound effects may hamper the effectiveness to recirculating and maintaining resources within production and consumption systems and across multiple life cycles.
Citation: Carly A. Fletcher. Is the consumer experience creating barriers for the effective uptake and disposal of bioplastics?[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2022, 2(4): 308-320. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2022016
Over the last decade, the European Union has developed objectives at a strategic level that seek to improve sustainability and circularity across all aspects of production and consumption. More recently, the Green Deal and Circular Economy Action Plan, have applied a specific focus on the production, use and disposal of plastics, where solutions that address the issues posed by traditional petroleum-based plastics have been sought. As a response to this strategic shift, the utilization of bioplastics (namely bio-based and/or biodegradable plastics) has been promoted as a potential solution, whereby they can substitute, or provide an alternative to, traditional petroleum-based plastics. However, successful uptake and the effective waste management of bioplastics, and products that utilize bioplastics, will be based on the consumer experience and ultimately market acceptance. This study explores three factors that may influence the consumer experience when purchasing, using, and disposing of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: consumer confusion, unrealistic expectations, and the value-action gap. Based on qualitative evidence gathered across the academic literature, this mini review suggests that all three aspects (both individually and combined) can have a marked effect on the uptake of bioplastics, and indeed other sustainable options. Indeed, when these potential impacts are considered in the broader context of a circular economy, it is suggested that feelings of cynicism and skepticism, along with unintended rebound effects may hamper the effectiveness to recirculating and maintaining resources within production and consumption systems and across multiple life cycles.
| [1] | Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3: e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782 |
| [2] |
Wojnarowski M, Sołtysik M, Prusak A (2021) Impact of eco-labelling on the implementation of sustainable production and consumption. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86: 106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106505 doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106505
|
| [3] | European Commission, A European Green Deal: Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. EC, 2020. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. |
| [4] | European Commission, A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission, 2018. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/792130. |
| [5] | European Commission, Circular economy. EC, 2020. Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/circular-economy_en. |
| [6] | European Bioplastics, What are bioplastics? EUBP, 2018. Available from: https://www.european-bioplastics.org/bioplastics/. |
| [7] |
Fletcher CA, Niemenoja K, Hunt R, et al. (2021) Addressing stakeholder concerns regarding the effective use of bio-based and biodegradable plastics. Resources 10: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10100095 doi: 10.3390/resources10100095
|
| [8] | Fletcher CA (2022) Consumer attitudes and expectations regarding the uptake of sustainable alternatives to fossil-based plastics in everyday use. Eighteenth International Conference on Environmental, Cultural, Economic & Social Sustainability, Granada, Spain, 26–28. |
| [9] |
Qin M, Chen C, Song B, et al. (2021) A review of biodegradable plastics to biodegradable microplastics: Another ecological threat to soil environments? J Cleaner Prod 312: 127816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127816 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127816
|
| [10] |
De Besi M, McCormick K (2015) Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability 7: 10461–10478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461 doi: 10.3390/su70810461
|
| [11] |
Acquavia MA, Pascale R, Martelli G, et al. (2021) Natural polymeric materials: A solution to plastic pollution from the agro-food sector. Polymers 13: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010158 doi: 10.3390/polym13010158
|
| [12] | Stasiškienė K, Draudvilienė L, Petkevičienė J, et al. (2022) Handbook on the Impacts of Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics on Existing Waste Management Frameworks, Hamburg: Bio-Plastics Europe. |
| [13] | Filho WL, Barbir J, Abubakar IR, et al. (2022) Consumer attitudes and concerns with bioplastics use: An international study. PLoS One 17: e0266918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266918 |
| [14] |
Klein F, Emberger-Klein A, Menrad K, et al. (2019) Influencing factors for the purchase intention of consumers choosing bioplastic products in Germany. Sustain Prod Consum 19: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.01.004
|
| [15] |
Philp JC, Bartsev A, Ritchie RJ, et al. (2013) Bioplastics science from a policy vantage point. New Biotechnol 30: 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.021
|
| [16] |
Falcone PM, Imbert E (2018) Social life cycle approach as a tool for promoting the market uptake of bio-based products from a consumer perspective. Sustainability 10: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041031 doi: 10.3390/su10041031
|
| [17] |
Ahmed T, Shahid M, Azeem F, et al. (2018) Biodegradation of plastics: current scenario and future prospects for environmental safety. Environ Sci Pollut R 25: 7287–7298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1234-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1234-9
|
| [18] |
Wang C, Ghadimi P, Lim MK, et al. (2019) A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies. J Cleaner Prod 206: 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.172 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.172
|
| [19] |
Chen YS, Chang CH (2013) Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. J Bus Ethics 114: 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0 doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
|
| [20] |
Mitchell VW, Papavassiliou V (1999) Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion. J Prod Brand Manag 8: 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429910284300 doi: 10.1108/10610429910284300
|
| [21] |
Langley S, Phan-Le NT, Brennan L, et al. (2021) The good, the bad, and the ugly: Food packaging and consumers. Sustainability 13: 12409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212409 doi: 10.3390/su132212409
|
| [22] |
Moon SJ, Costello JP, Koo DM (2017) The impact of consumer confusion from eco-labels on negative WOM, distrust, and dissatisfaction. IJA 36: 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1158223 doi: 10.1080/02650487.2016.1158223
|
| [23] |
Boz Z, Korhonen V, Sand CK (2020) Consumer considerations for the implementation of sustainable packaging: A review. Sustainability 12: 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062192 doi: 10.3390/su12062192
|
| [24] |
Segrin C, Nabi RL (2006) Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? J Commun 52: 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02543.x doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02543.x
|
| [25] |
Galloway L, Engstrom E, Emmers-Sommer TM (2015) Does movie viewing cultivate young people's unrealistic expectations about love and marriage? Marriage Fam Rev 51: 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1061629 doi: 10.1080/01494929.2015.1061629
|
| [26] | Polivy J (2001) The false hope syndrome: unrealistic expectations of self-change. Int J Obesity 25: S80–S84. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801705 |
| [27] |
Tinsley HE, Bowman SL, Barich AW (1993) Counseling psychologists' perceptions of the occurrence and effects of unrealistic expectations about counseling and psychotherapy among their clients. J Couns Psychol 40: 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.40.1.46 doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.40.1.46
|
| [28] | Braunwald E, Maroko P (1976) ST-segment mapping. Realistic and unrealistic expectations. Circulation 54: 529–532. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.54.4.529 |
| [29] |
Singer M, Inada-Kim M, Shankar-Hari M (2019) Sepsis hysteria: excess hype and unrealistic expectations. Lancet 394: 1513–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32483-3 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32483-3
|
| [30] |
Blake J (1999) Overcoming the "value-action gap" in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ 4: 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725599 doi: 10.1080/13549839908725599
|
| [31] |
Gadenne D, Sharma B, Kerr D, et al. (2011) The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviors. Energ Policy 39: 7684–7694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002
|
| [32] |
Barr S (2006) Environmental action in the home: Investigating the "value-action" gap. Geography 91: 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2006.12094149 doi: 10.1080/00167487.2006.12094149
|
| [33] |
Panda TK, Kumar A, Jakhar S, et al. (2020) Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers' altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J Cleaner Prod 243: 118575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575
|
| [34] |
Chaplin G, Wyton P (2014) Student engagement with sustainability: understanding the value–action gap. Int J Sustain High Educ 15: 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2012-0029 doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2012-0029
|
| [35] |
Liliani L, Tjahjono B (2020) A conceptual framework for a dyadic supplier-customer co-innovation of bioplastic packaging. Procedia CIRP 90: 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.056 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.056
|
| [36] |
Filho WL, Salvia AL, Bonoli A, et al. (2021) An assessment of attitudes towards plastics and bioplastics in Europe. Sci Total Environ 755: 142732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142732 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142732
|
| [37] |
Kohtala C, Hyysalo S, Whalen J (2020) A taxonomy of users' active design engagement in the 21st century. Des Stud 67: 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.008
|
| [38] |
Dijkstra H, van Beukering P, Brouwer R (2020) Business models and sustainable plastic management: A systematic review of the literature. J Cleaner Prod 258: 120967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120967 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120967
|
| [39] |
Neves AC, Moyne MM, Eyre C, et al. (2020) Acceptability and societal impact of the introduction of bioplastics as novel environmentally friendly packaging materials in Ireland. Clean Technol 2: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol2010009 doi: 10.3390/cleantechnol2010009
|
| [40] |
Herrmann C, Rhein S, Sträter KF (2022) Consumers' sustainability-related perception of and willingness-to-pay for food packaging alternatives. Resour Conserv Recy 181: 106219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219
|
| [41] |
Nemat B, Razzaghi M, Bolton K, et al. (2022) Design affordance of plastic food packaging for consumer sorting behavior. Resour Conserv Recy 177: 105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105949 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105949
|
| [42] |
Mehta N, Cunningham E, Roy D, et al. (2021) Exploring perceptions of environmental professionals, plastic processors, students and consumers of bio-based plastics: Informing the development of the sector. Sustain Prod Consum 26: 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.015 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.015
|
| [43] |
Kakadellis S, Woods J, Harris ZM (2021) Friend or foe: Stakeholder attitudes towards biodegradable plastic packaging in food waste anaerobic digestion. Resour Conserv Recy 169: 105529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105529 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105529
|
| [44] |
Wilde K, Hermans F (2021) Innovation in the bioeconomy: Perspectives of entrepreneurs on relevant framework conditions. J Cleaner Prod 314: 127979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127979 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127979
|
| [45] |
Ansink E, Wijk L, Zuidmeer F (2022) No clue about bioplastics. Ecol Econ 191: 107245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107245 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107245
|
| [46] |
Stark S, Biber-Freudenberger L, Dietz T, et al. (2022) Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy. Sustain Prod Consum 29: 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011
|
| [47] | Siltaloppi J, Jähi M (2021) Toward a sustainable plastics value chain: Core conundrums and emerging solution mechanisms for a systemic transition. J Cleaner Prod 315: 128113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128113 |
| [48] |
Gerassimidou S, Lovat E, Ebner N, et al. (2022) Unpacking the complexity of the UK plastic packaging value chain: A stakeholder perspective. Sustain Prod Consum 30: 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.005
|
| [49] | Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis, In: Willig C, Rogers WS, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1 Ed., London: Sage, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2 |
| [50] |
D'Amico M, Di Vita G, Monaco L (2016) Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. J Cleaner Prod 120: 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014
|
| [51] |
D'Souza C, Taghian M, Brouwer AR (2021) Ecolabels information and consumer self-confidence in decision making: a strategic imperative. J Strateg Mark 29: 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2019.1636845 doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2019.1636845
|
| [52] |
Bearden WO, Hardesty DM, Rose RL (2001) Consumer self-confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. J Consum Res 28: 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/321951 doi: 10.1086/321951
|
| [53] |
Hameed I, Hyder Z, Imran M, et al. (2021) Greenwash and green purchase behavior: an environmentally sustainable perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 23: 13113–13134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01202-1 doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01202-1
|
| [54] |
Knickmeyer D (2020) Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. J Cleaner Prod 245: 118605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
|
| [55] |
Brockhaus S, Petersen M, Kersten W (2016) A crossroads for bioplastics: exploring product developers' challenges to move beyond petroleum-based plastics. J Cleaner Prod 127: 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.003
|
Carly A. Fletcher. Is the consumer experience creating barriers for the effective uptake and disposal of bioplastics?[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2022, 2(4): 308-320. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2022016
DownLoad: