Research article

Advancement in orthodontic bonding: comparing 1-second and 5-second light emitting diode (LED) curing lights

  • Received: 13 July 2024 Revised: 09 September 2024 Accepted: 20 September 2024 Published: 25 September 2024
  • Recent advancements in dentistry have introduced new light-curing units such as 1-second and 5-second LED curing lights to orthodontics. We aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of stainless-steel orthodontic brackets cured with 1-second, and 5-second LED curing lights. Ninety human extracted upper premolars were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I and Group II. In Group I, the teeth were bonded with Standard pre-adjusted edgewise upper premolar brackets (Orthox, JJ Orthodontics) using Transbond XT and cured with Woodpecker iLED 1-second curing light. In Group II, the same brackets and composite were used to bond and light-cure with 5-seconds Woodpecker LED-D unit. The shear bond strength and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of brackets in both groups were evaluated. Student t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the data. In Group-I (1-second LED curing light), the shear bond strength was 6.62 MPa, whereas it was 10.32 MPa in group II (5-second LED curing light). A highly significant difference was observed in the shear bond strength between the groups. The ARI scores further revealed that the 5-second curing light resulted in a safer failure mode, with adhesive remaining mostly on the bracket. We found that the 5-second Woodpecker LED-D curing light demonstrated higher shear bond strength compared to the 1-second iLED curing light, although both sets of bond strength values are clinically acceptable.

    Citation: Praveen Kumar Neela, Prathyusha Dasari, Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli, Mahamad Irfanulla Khan A N, Udayini Monica, Naresh Mangalapu, Shahistha Parveen Dasnadi. Advancement in orthodontic bonding: comparing 1-second and 5-second light emitting diode (LED) curing lights[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(3): 370-377. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024020

    Related Papers:

  • Recent advancements in dentistry have introduced new light-curing units such as 1-second and 5-second LED curing lights to orthodontics. We aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of stainless-steel orthodontic brackets cured with 1-second, and 5-second LED curing lights. Ninety human extracted upper premolars were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I and Group II. In Group I, the teeth were bonded with Standard pre-adjusted edgewise upper premolar brackets (Orthox, JJ Orthodontics) using Transbond XT and cured with Woodpecker iLED 1-second curing light. In Group II, the same brackets and composite were used to bond and light-cure with 5-seconds Woodpecker LED-D unit. The shear bond strength and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of brackets in both groups were evaluated. Student t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the data. In Group-I (1-second LED curing light), the shear bond strength was 6.62 MPa, whereas it was 10.32 MPa in group II (5-second LED curing light). A highly significant difference was observed in the shear bond strength between the groups. The ARI scores further revealed that the 5-second curing light resulted in a safer failure mode, with adhesive remaining mostly on the bracket. We found that the 5-second Woodpecker LED-D curing light demonstrated higher shear bond strength compared to the 1-second iLED curing light, although both sets of bond strength values are clinically acceptable.



    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    The authors wish to express their gratitude to the MSME Testing Station, Hyderabad, India, for providing the research facilities and technical support essential for the completion of this study.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    Author contributions



    Praveen Kumar Neela conceptualized the study, designed the methodology, conducted data analysis, and contributed to writing and revising the manuscript. Prathyusha Dasari assisted with the literature review, performed experiments, collected data, and manuscript preparation. Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli supported data collection and statistical analysis. Mahamad Irfanulla Khan A N analyzed the data, prepared the manuscript and tables, and participated in revisions and proofreading. Udayini Monica conducted fieldwork and gathered relevant data. Naresh Mangalapu coordinated research activities and ensured compliance with ethical standards. Shahistha Parveen Dasnadi provided critical insights during the review process and edited the manuscript.

    [1] Buonocore MG (1955) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
    [2] Hildebrand NKS, Raboud DW, Heo G, et al. (2007) Argon laser vs conventional visible light-cured orthodontic bracket bonding: an in–vivo and in–vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac 131: 530-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.029
    [3] Wendl B, Droschl H, Kern W (2004) A comparative study of polymerization lamps to determine the degree of cure of composites using infrared spectroscopy. Eur J Orthodont 26: 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.5.545
    [4] Tavas MA, Watts DC (1979) Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light-activated composite: an in vitro study. Brit J Orthod 6: 207-208. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.6.4.207
    [5] Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, et al. (1999) Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac 115: 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70312-4
    [6] Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH (1999) Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light-emitting diode technology. Brit Dent J 186: 388-391. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800120
    [7] Alsafadi A, Rajeh N, Hajeer MY, et al. (2024) Temperature changes in the pulp chamber during orthodontic bonding using a high-power light-emitting diode device with two different exposure times and intensities: an in-vitro study. Cureus 16: e61287. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61287
    [8] Gomes P, Portugal J, Jardin L (2014) Effect of high–powered LED–curing exposure time on orthodontic bracket shear bond strength. Rev Port Estomatol M 55: 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.04.001
    [9] Reynolds IR (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2: 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8874909
    [10] Uşumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI (2004) Effect of light-emitting diode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 74: 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0259:EOLDOB>2.0.CO;2
    [11] Sharma S, Tandon P, Nagar A, et al. (2014) A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. J Orthod Sci 3: 29-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132892
    [12] Mavropoulos A, Staudt CB, Kiliaridis S (2005) Light curing time reduction: in vitro evaluation of new intensive light-emitting diode curing units. Eur J Orthod 27: 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji021
    [13] Staudt CB, Mavropoulos A, Bouillaguet S, et al. (2005) Light-curing time reduction with a new high-power halogen lamp. Am J Orthod Dentofac 128: 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.020
    [14] Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2005) Resin composite properties and energy density of light cure. J Dent Res 84: 659-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400715
    [15] Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE (2004) Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times. Am J Orthod Dentofac 125: 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.011
    [16] Kumar CN, Gururaj M, Paul J (2012) A comparative evaluation of curing depth and compressive strength of dental composite cured with halogen light curing unit and blue light emitting diode: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 13: 834-847. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1238
    [17] Guravaiah D, Prudhvi K, Kiran SSM, et al. (2023) An in-vitro comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant score between two color change adhesives in orthodontic bonding with reduced curing time using different high-intensity light emitting diode units. Cureus 15: e40951. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40951
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(320) PDF downloads(23) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog