This research aimed to isolate Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from Amazonian fruits for potential utilization in beer production. Yeast strains were derived from the spontaneous fermentation of Arazá (Eugenia stipitata MacVaught), cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.), and cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum Wild. Ex Spreng. Schum) fruits. Identification of the isolated strains was achieved through biochemical assays and ITS rDNA (Internal Transcribed Spacer ribosomal DNA), sequencing, with emphasis on determining their affiliation to S. cerevisiae and assessing phylogenetic ties. Out of the 76 colonies isolated from the fruit fermentations, seven were distinctly identified as S. cerevisiae. Phylogenetic assessments unveiled significant parallels between regional isolates and commercial strains. Notably, beer brewed with the S. cerevisiae AR 03 isolate exhibits physical-chemical attributes characteristics similar to those found in American ale commercial beers. These findings underscore the untapped potential of leveraging Amazonian yeasts in brewing, a step forward for the region's burgeoning bioeconomy.
Citation: Luan Reis Honorato da Silva, Flávia da Silva Fernandes, Jocélia Pinheiro Santos, Érica Simplício de Souza, Lívia Melo Carneiro, João Paulo Alves Silva, Jacqueline da Silva Batista, João Vicente Braga de Souza. Bioprospecting Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fruits from Amazonian region for beer brewing[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(2): 130-146. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024008
This research aimed to isolate Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from Amazonian fruits for potential utilization in beer production. Yeast strains were derived from the spontaneous fermentation of Arazá (Eugenia stipitata MacVaught), cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.), and cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum Wild. Ex Spreng. Schum) fruits. Identification of the isolated strains was achieved through biochemical assays and ITS rDNA (Internal Transcribed Spacer ribosomal DNA), sequencing, with emphasis on determining their affiliation to S. cerevisiae and assessing phylogenetic ties. Out of the 76 colonies isolated from the fruit fermentations, seven were distinctly identified as S. cerevisiae. Phylogenetic assessments unveiled significant parallels between regional isolates and commercial strains. Notably, beer brewed with the S. cerevisiae AR 03 isolate exhibits physical-chemical attributes characteristics similar to those found in American ale commercial beers. These findings underscore the untapped potential of leveraging Amazonian yeasts in brewing, a step forward for the region's burgeoning bioeconomy.
[1] | Iorizzo M, Letizia F, Albanese G, et al. (2021) Potential for lager beer production from saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from the vineyard environment. Processes 9: 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091628 |
[2] | Bamforth CW (2017) Progress in brewing science and beer production. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 8: 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450 |
[3] | Pires EJ, Teixeira JA, Brányik T, et al. (2014) Yeast: The soul of beer's aroma — a review of flavour-active esters and higher alcohols produced by the brewing yeast. Appl Microbiol Biot 98: 1937-1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5470-0 |
[4] | Spevacek AR, Benson KH, Bamforth CW, et al. (2016) Beer metabolomics: Molecular details of the brewing process and the differential effects of late and dry hopping on yeast purine metabolism. J Inst Brew 122: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.291 |
[5] | Lorca Mandujano GP, Alves HC, Prado CD, et al. (2022) Identification and selection of a new saccharomyces cerevisiae strain isolated from Brazilian ethanol fermentation process for application in beer production. Food Microbiol 103: 103958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103958 |
[6] | Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, et al. (2011) Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 14539-14544. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105430108 |
[7] | Araujo Piraine RE, Nickens DG, Sun DJ, et al. (2022) Isolation of wild yeasts from Olympic National Park and Moniliella megachiliensis ONP131 physiological characterization for beer fermentation. Food Microbiol 104: 103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103974 |
[8] | Pinto FO, Lopes T, Vieira AM, et al. (2023) Isolation, selection and characterization of wild yeasts with potential for brewing. J Am Soc Brew Chem 81: 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2031777 |
[9] | Vivian AF, Aoyagui CT, de Oliveira DN, et al. (2016) Mass spectrometry for the characterization of brewing process. Food Res Int 89: 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.08.008 |
[10] | Tokpohozin SE, Fischer S, Becker T (2019) Selection of a new saccharomyces yeast to enhance relevant sorghum beer aroma components, higher alcohols and esters. Food Microbiol 83: 181-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.05.014 |
[11] | Aouizerat T, Gutman I, Paz Y, et al. (2019) Isolation and characterization of live yeast cells from ancient vessels as a tool in bio-archaeology. MBio 10. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00388-19 |
[12] | Bücker A, Bücker-Falcão NC (2018) How can Amazonian biodiversity contribute to the strengthening of the bioeconomy?. J Microbiol Exp 6: 148-149. https://doi.org/10.15406/jmen.2018.06.00206 |
[13] | Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (2011) Chapter 1 — Definition, classification and nomenclature of the yeasts. The Yeasts. London: Elsevier 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52149-1.00001-X |
[14] | Ferrer C, Colom F, Frasés S, et al. (2001) Detection and identification of fungal pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8S ribosomal DNA typing in ocular infections. J Clin Microbiol 39: 2873-2879. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.8.2873-2879.2001 |
[15] | White PL, Alanio A, Cruciani M, et al. (2020) Nucleic acid tools for invasive fungal disease diagnosis. Curr Fungal Infect R 14: 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-020-00374-7 |
[16] | White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York: Academic Press 315-322. |
[17] | Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, et al. (1993) Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 31: 2274-2280. https://doi.org/0095-1137/93/092274-07$02.00/0 |
[18] | Wood IP, Elliston A, Ryden P, et al. (2012) Rapid quantification of reducing sugars in biomass hydrolysates: Improving the speed and precision of the dinitrosalicylic acid assay. Biomass Bioenery 44: 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.003 |
[19] | Komatsuzaki N, Okumura R, Sakurai M, et al. (2016) Characteristics of saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from fruits and humus: Their suitability for bread making. Food Sci Technol 6: 55-63. https://sid.ir/paper/331247/en |
[20] | Matraxia M, Alfonzo A, Prestianni R, et al. (2021) Non-conventional yeasts from fermented honey by-products: Focus on Hanseniaspora uvarum strains for craft beer production. Food Microbiol 99: 103806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103806 |
[21] | Tekpinar AD, Kalmer A (2019) Utility of various molecular markers in fungal identification and phylogeny. Nova Hedwigia 109: 187-224. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2019/0528 |
[22] | Naranjo-Ortiz MA, Gabaldón T (2019) Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi. Biol Rev 94: 2101-2137. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12550 |
[23] | Fernandes SF, da Silva LRH, de Souza ES, et al. (2024) Isolation, genetic identification of Amazonian yeasts and analysis of thermotolerance and alcohol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Theobroma grandiflorum and Eugenia stipitata. AIMS Bioeng 11: 24-42. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2024003 |
[24] | Fernandes SF, Souza ES, Carneiro LM, et al. (2022) Current ethanol production requirements for the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Microbiol 7878830. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7878830 |
[25] | Burdock GA, Carabin IG (2004) Generally recognized as safe (GRAS): History and description. Toxicol Lett 150: 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.07.004 |