This study aimed to explain the crop yield prediction system as a way to address the challenges posed by global warming and climate change in Saudi Arabia, while also taking into account socio-economic factors. Machine learning models were trained using crop yield prediction data to provide recommendations for future crop production. Climate change poses significant challenges, with rising temperatures and extreme weather events being increasingly evident. Agriculture, contributing 14% of greenhouse gas emissions, plays a crucial role in exacerbating this issue. This study introduced a crop yield prediction system leveraging machine learning models trained on comprehensive datasets. Recommendations derived from these models offer insights into optimal crop rotation strategies, particularly relevant for regions like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Collaboration between farmers and governments, informed by data-driven approaches, is crucial in this endeavor. Utilizing a customized dataset, this study analyzed a machine learning model performance and identified optimal hyperparameters. XGBoost ensemble emerged as the top performer with an R2 score of 0.9745, showcasing its potential to advance crop yield prediction capabilities. By integrating machine learning into agricultural decision-making processes, stakeholders aim to enhance crop production and soil health and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts. This collaborative effort represents a significant step toward sustainable agriculture and climate resilience in Saudi Arabia.
Citation: Mohammad M. Islam, Majed Alharthi, Rotana S. Alkadi, Rafiqul Islam, Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum. Crop yield prediction through machine learning: A path towards sustainable agriculture and climate resilience in Saudi Arabia[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 980-1003. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024053
This study aimed to explain the crop yield prediction system as a way to address the challenges posed by global warming and climate change in Saudi Arabia, while also taking into account socio-economic factors. Machine learning models were trained using crop yield prediction data to provide recommendations for future crop production. Climate change poses significant challenges, with rising temperatures and extreme weather events being increasingly evident. Agriculture, contributing 14% of greenhouse gas emissions, plays a crucial role in exacerbating this issue. This study introduced a crop yield prediction system leveraging machine learning models trained on comprehensive datasets. Recommendations derived from these models offer insights into optimal crop rotation strategies, particularly relevant for regions like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Collaboration between farmers and governments, informed by data-driven approaches, is crucial in this endeavor. Utilizing a customized dataset, this study analyzed a machine learning model performance and identified optimal hyperparameters. XGBoost ensemble emerged as the top performer with an R2 score of 0.9745, showcasing its potential to advance crop yield prediction capabilities. By integrating machine learning into agricultural decision-making processes, stakeholders aim to enhance crop production and soil health and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts. This collaborative effort represents a significant step toward sustainable agriculture and climate resilience in Saudi Arabia.
[1] | Romm JJ (2022) Climate change: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. |
[2] | DeNicola E, Aburizaiza OS, Siddique A, et al. (2015) Climate change and water scarcity: The case of Saudi Arabia. Ann Global Health 81: 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.005 |
[3] | Field CB (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245 |
[4] | Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, et al. (2018) Global warming of 1.5 ℃: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 ℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press. |
[5] | Edenhofer O (2015) Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. |
[6] | Montoya JH, Tsai C, Vojvodic A, et al. (2015) The challenge of electro- chemical ammonia synthesis: A new perspective on the role of nitrogen scaling relations. ChemSusChem 8: 2180–2186. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500322 doi: 10.1002/cssc.201500322 |
[7] | Robertson GP, Vitousek PM (2009) Nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource. Ann Rev Environ Resour 34: 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046 doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046 |
[8] | Hawken P (2017) Drawdown: The most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. Penguin. |
[9] | Wahabzada M, Mahlein AK, Bauckhage C, et al. (2016) Plant phenotyping using probabilistic topic models: uncovering the hyperspectral language of plants. Sci Rep 6: 22482. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22482 doi: 10.1038/srep22482 |
[10] | Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, et al. (2018) Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors 18: 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082674 doi: 10.3390/s18082674 |
[11] | Rossel RAV, Bouma J (2016) Soil sensing: A new paradigm for agriculture. Agric Syst 148: 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.001 |
[12] | You J, Li X, Low M, et al. (2017) Deep gaussian process for crop yield prediction based on remote sensing data. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31: No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11172 |
[13] | Ma W, Nowocin K, Marathe N, et al. (2019) An interpretable produce price forecasting system for small and marginal farmers in india using collaborative fil- tering and adaptive nearest neighbors. In: ICTD '19: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287100 |
[14] | Alskaf K, Mooney S, Sparkes D, et al. (2021) Short-term impacts of different tillage practices and plant residue retention on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Tillage Res 206: 104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104803 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104803 |
[15] | Siwar C, Alam MM, Murad MW, et al. (2009) A review of the linkages between climate change, agricultural sustainability and poverty in Malaysia. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 5: 309–321. |
[16] | Kurukulasuriya P, Rosenthal S (2003) Climate change and agriculture. World Bank Environment Department Paper 91. |
[17] | Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. IPCC Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf. |
[18] | IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014—Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Cambridge University Press. Available from: http://www.cambridge.org/9781107641655. |
[19] | Webster M, Forest C, Reilly J, et al. (2003) Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Clim Change 61: 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004564.09961.9f doi: 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004564.09961.9f |
[20] | Zwiers FW (2002) The 20-year forecast. Nature 416: 690–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/416690a doi: 10.1038/416690a |
[21] | Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge University Press. |
[22] | Emissions gap report 2022 (2022) United Nations Environment Programme. |
[23] | Alkolibi FM (2002) Possible effects of global warming on agriculture and water resources in Saudi Arabia: Impacts and responses. Clim Change 54: 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015777403153 doi: 10.1023/A:1015777403153 |
[24] | Aleid SM, Al-Khayri JM, Al-Bahrany AM (2015) Date palm status and perspective in Saudi Arabia. In: Al-Khayri JM, Al-Khayri SM, Johnson DV (Eds.), Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization Volume 2: Asia and Europe, 49–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9707-8_3 |
[25] | Assiri A, Darfaoui E (2009) Response to climate change in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A report prepared for FAO-RNE 17. |
[26] | Allbed A, Kumar L, Shabani F (2017) Climate change impacts on date palm cultivation in Saudi Arabia. J Agric Sci 155: 1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000260 doi: 10.1017/S0021859617000260 |
[27] | Global Arab Network (2010) Great transition—Saudi Arabia planting new seeds. Available from: https://www.farmlandgrab.org/post/view/12434-great-transition-saudi-arabia-planting-new-seeds. |
[28] | Mbaga MD (2013) Alternative mechanisms for achieving food security in Oman. Agric Food Sec 2: Article number: 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-3 |
[29] | Haque MI, Khan MR (2022) Impact of climate change on food security in Saudi Arabia: A roadmap to agriculture-water sustainability. J Agribus Dev Emerging Econ 12: No. 1, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2020-0127 |
[30] | Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, et al. (2007) Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf. |
[31] | Baig MB, Straquadine GS (2014) Sustainable agriculture and rural development in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Implications for agricultural extension and education. In: Behnassi M, Muteng'e MS, Ramachandran G, et al. (Eds.), Vulnerability of agriculture, water and fisheries to climate change: Toward sustainable adaptation strategies, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8962-2_7 |
[32] | Al-Karaki GN, Al-Hashimi M (2012) Green fodder production and water use efficiency of some forage crops under hydroponic conditions. Int Scholarly Res Not 2012: 924672. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/924672 doi: 10.5402/2012/924672 |
[33] | Fiaz S, Noor MA, Aldosri FO (2018) Achieving food security in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia through innovation: Potential role of agricultural extension. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 17: 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.09.001 |
[34] | Frederick KD, Kneese AV (1990) Reallocation by markets and prices. Clim Change US Water Resour 1990: 395–419. |
[35] | Nguyen N, Drakou EG (2021) Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: The case of Vietnamese coffee. J Cleaner Prod 303: 126828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828 |
[36] | Al-Shayaa MS, Baig MB, Straquadine GS (2012) Agricultural extension in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Difficult present and demanding future. J Anim Plant Sci 22: 239–246. |
[37] | AL-Subaiee SS (2023) Extension agents' perceptions regarding sustainable agriculture in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia. Pennsylvania State University. |
[38] | Kassie M, Zikhali P (2009) Brief on sustainable agriculture. In: Expert Group Meeting on "Sustainable Land Management and Agricultural Practices in Africa: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Farmers", Gothenburg, Sweden, 16–17. |
[39] | Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27: 249–269. |
[40] | MEWA (2016) National Water Strategy 2030: Towards Sustainable Water Sector that Develops and Conserves Water Resources. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC191510/. |
[41] | Alotaibi BA, Kassem HS, Abdullah AZ, et al. (2020) Farmers' awareness of agri-environmental legislation in Saudi Arabia. Land Use Policy 99: 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104902 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104902 |
[42] | Alotaibi BA, Kassem HS, Nayak RK, et al. (2020) Farmers' beliefs and concerns about climate change: an assessment from southern Saudi Arabia. Agriculture 10: 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070253 doi: 10.3390/agriculture10070253 |
[43] | Alotaibi BA, Abbas A, Ullah R, et al. (2021) Climate change concerns of Saudi Arabian farmers: The drivers and their role in perceived capacity building needs for adaptation. Sustainability 13: 12677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212677 doi: 10.3390/su132212677 |
[44] | Al-Zaidi A, Elhag E, Al-Otaibi S, et al. (2011) Negative effects of pesticides on the environment and the farmers awareness in Saudi Arabia: A case study. J Anim Plant Sci 21: 605–611. |
[45] | Almutawa AA (2022) Date production in the Al-Hassa region, Saudi Arabia in the face of climate change. J Water Clim Change 13: 2627–2647. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2022.461 doi: 10.2166/wcc.2022.461 |
[46] | Ji B, Sun Y, Yang S, et al. (2007) Artificial neural networks for rice yield prediction in mountainous regions. J Agric Sci 145: 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859606006691 doi: 10.1017/S0021859606006691 |
[47] | Drummond ST, Sudduth KA, Joshi A, et al. (2003) Statis- tical and neural methods for site–specific yield prediction. Trans ASAE 46: 5–14. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.12541 doi: 10.13031/2013.12541 |
[48] | Kaggle (2024) Crop Yield Prediction Dataset. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/patelris/crop-yield-prediction-dataset. |
[49] | Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Available from: https://www.fao.org/home/en/. |
[50] | World Bank Open Data. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/. |
[51] | Keerthana M, Meghana K, Pravallika S, et al. (2021) An ensemble algorithm for crop yield prediction. In: 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV), IEEE, 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICV50876.2021.9388479 |