Sustainable public procurement and constrained agricultural entrepreneurship

Marcello De Rosa; Annalisa Castelli; Luca Bartoli; Martina Francescone; Marcello De Rosa; Annalisa Castelli; Luca Bartoli; Martina Francescone

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2023032

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2023, Volume 8, Issue 2: 585-597. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023032

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Sustainable public procurement and constrained agricultural entrepreneurship

Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Via Folcara, 03043 Cassino (FR)—Italy

Received: 18 March 2023 Revised: 04 May 2023 Accepted: 09 May 2023 Published: 22 May 2023

This paper analyzes the relevance of green public procurement (GPP) in boosting the transition to more sustainable and innovative regional and localized agrifood systems. Many scholars have emphasized the importance of the GPP in stimulating various positive effects and impacts on the sustainability of agrifood systems. Framed within the context of the sustainable competitiveness of localized agrifood systems, the GPP represents an excellent opportunity for a more sustainable farming sector. If well exploited, it may relaunch smallholder farms' competitiveness on a regional scale. Moreover, the GPP effectively addresses sustainability issues like fighting food insecurity and reducing food waste. The possibility of adhering to these localized modes of food provisioning engenders constrained rural entrepreneurship due to the regulatory system which mandates compliance by the farming sector. The paper provides an empirical analysis of the region Lazio of Italy to evidence the eventual propensity of regional farms and eventual entry barriers. The results of the analysis show, on the one side, high interest primarily within regional organic farms; on the other side, the results evidence that compliance with mandatory regulation and organizational and logistic assets represent the principal limit to exploit this opportunity fully. Consequently, reduced exploitation of this opportunity is translated into a rate of transition to more sustainable regional farming systems.
- green public procurement,
- environmental criteria,
- constrained entrepreneurship,
- sustainable farming systems,
- short food supply chain
Citation: Marcello De Rosa, Annalisa Castelli, Luca Bartoli, Martina Francescone. Sustainable public procurement and constrained agricultural entrepreneurship[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 585-597. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023032

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relevance of green public procurement (GPP) in boosting the transition to more sustainable and innovative regional and localized agrifood systems. Many scholars have emphasized the importance of the GPP in stimulating various positive effects and impacts on the sustainability of agrifood systems. Framed within the context of the sustainable competitiveness of localized agrifood systems, the GPP represents an excellent opportunity for a more sustainable farming sector. If well exploited, it may relaunch smallholder farms' competitiveness on a regional scale. Moreover, the GPP effectively addresses sustainability issues like fighting food insecurity and reducing food waste. The possibility of adhering to these localized modes of food provisioning engenders constrained rural entrepreneurship due to the regulatory system which mandates compliance by the farming sector. The paper provides an empirical analysis of the region Lazio of Italy to evidence the eventual propensity of regional farms and eventual entry barriers. The results of the analysis show, on the one side, high interest primarily within regional organic farms; on the other side, the results evidence that compliance with mandatory regulation and organizational and logistic assets represent the principal limit to exploit this opportunity fully. Consequently, reduced exploitation of this opportunity is translated into a rate of transition to more sustainable regional farming systems.

References

[1]	Gaitán-Cremaschi D, Klerkx L, Aguilar-Gallegos N, et al. (2022) Public food procurement from family farming: A food system and social network perspective. Food Policy 111: 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102325 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102325
[2]	European Union (2016) Buying green! A handbook on green public procurement. Luxembourg.
[3]	Swensson LFJ, Hunter D, Schneider S, et al. (2021) Public food procurement as a game changer for food system transformation. In: FAO, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT and Editora da UFRGS, Public food procurement for sustainable food systems and healthy diets—Volume 1, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7960en
[4]	FAO (2018) Strengthening sector policies for better food security and nutrition results. Public food procurement, Rome: FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/CA2281EN/ca2281en.pdf.
[5]	Smith J, Andersson G, Gourlay R, et al. (2016) Balancing competing policy demands: The case of sustainable public sector food procurement. J Cleaner Prod 112-Part Ⅰ: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065
[6]	Parsons K, Barling D (2022) Identifying the policy instrument interactions to enable the public procurement of sustainable food. Agriculture 12: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040506 doi: 10.3390/agriculture12040506
[7]	Sonnino R, Marsden TK (2006) Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. J Econ Geogr 6: 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi006 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi006
[8]	Oostinide H, van Broekhuizen R (2008) The dynamics of novelty production. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.
[9]	Avelino F, Wittmayer J, Kemp R, et al. (2014) Game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecol Soc 22: 41–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798984
[10]	Jeannerat H, Crevoisier O (2022) From competitiveness to territorial value: Transformative territorial innovation policies and anchoring milieus. Eur Plann Stud 30: 2157–2177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2042208 doi: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2042208
[11]	Cheriet F, Messeghem K, Lagarde V, et al. (2020) Agricultural entrepreneurship: Challenges and perspectives. Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat 19: 13–29.
[12]	Fonte M (2008) Naming Food After Places. Food Relocalisation and Knowledge Dynamics in Rural Development, London: Routledge.
[13]	McElwee G (2008) A taxonomy of entrepreneurial farmers. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Bus 6: 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.019139 doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2008.019139
[14]	McElwee G (2005) A Literature review of entrepreneurship in agriculture, Project "Developing entrepreneurial skills of farmers" (ESoF).
[15]	van der Ploeg JD, van Broekhuizen R, Brunori G, et al. (2008) Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.
[16]	Condor R (2020) Entrepreneurship in agriculture: A literature review. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Bus 40: 516–562. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.109013 doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2020.109013
[17]	Gittins P, McElwee G, Lever J (2022) Constrained entrepreneurship in UK agriculture: A Weberian analysis, J Rural Stud 95: 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.021
[18]	McElwee G, Smith R (2015) Researching rural enterprise. In: Fayolle A (Ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurship. What We Know and What We Need to Know, London: Edward Elgar.
[19]	Blundel R, Lockett N, Wang C (2018) Exploring entrepreneurship, Strathclyde: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[20]	Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship. Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory Pract 35: 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
[21]	Storper M (1997) Regional Worlds, New York: Guilford.
[22]	Mattas K, Tsakiridou E, Karelakis C, et al. (2022) Strengthening the sustainability of European food chains through quality and procurement policies. Trends Food Sci Technol 120: 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.021
[23]	Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1991) Les économies de la grandeur, Paris: Gallimard.
[24]	Marescotti A (2000) Marketing channels, quality hallmarks and the theory of conventions. In: Sylvander B, Barjolle D, Arfini F (Eds.), The socio-economics of origin labelled products in agro-food supply chains: spatial, institutional and co-ordination aspects, Inra, Serie Actes et Communications, Paris, 17-2: 103–122.
[25]	Renting H, Schermer M, Rossi A (2012) Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. Int J Soc Agric Food 19: 289–307
[26]	Lozano C, Schneider S, Swensson L, et al. (2016) Unfolding matters in public food procurement: Contextualizing lessons and steps forward in school food policy reform. Raizes 36: 17–31. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2016.v36.456 doi: 10.37370/raizes.2016.v36.456
[27]	Swensson LFJ (2016) Collective actions and the access of smallholder farmers to institutional markets: Opportunities and legal challenges in Brazilian institutional food procurement programmes. In: Da Silva C, Mpagalile J, van Rooyen, et al. (Eds.), Enabling more inclusive and efficient food and agricultural systems in Africa: FAO session at the IFAMA World Forum 18 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa.
[28]	Messeghem K, Cheriet F, Lagarde V, et al. (2020) Agricultural entrepreneurship: Challenges and perspectives. Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat 19: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.194.0013 doi: 10.3917/entre.194.0013
[29]	Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J Manage 29: 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304 doi: 10.1177/014920630302900304
[30]	Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. J Econ Lit 35: 60–85.
[31]	Nzembaie KF, Buckley AP (2022) Digital entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[32]	OECD (2015) List of indicators of entrepreneurial determinants. In: Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2015-31-en
[33]	Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren E, et al. (2011) Introduction: Researching entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development. In: Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren E, et al. (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933249
[34]	Gaglio CM, Katz JA (2001) The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Bus Econ 16: 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011132102464 doi: 10.1023/A:1011132102464
[35]	Cofré-Bravo G, Klerkx L, Englera A (2019) Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. J Rural Stud 69: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
[36]	Vecchio Y, Francescone M, Adinolfi F, et al. (2022) "Ambidexterity": Trump card for farm's innovativeness and competitiveness. Br Food J 124: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0264 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0264
[37]	Knickel K, Schiller S, von Münchhausen S, et al. (2008) New institutional framework in rural development. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)