Research article

Salinity tolerance selection of doubled-haploid rice lines based on selection index and factor analysis

  • Received: 31 December 2021 Revised: 08 May 2022 Accepted: 02 June 2022 Published: 12 July 2022
  • The development of tolerant rice varieties using doubled-haploid technology is necessary to speed up the release of a variety tolerant to salinity stress. However, this requires a reliable screening method and selection index model for enhancing selection effectiveness. One approach is through the development of a selection index based on factor analysis under soil salinity screening in the greenhouse. The objective of this study was to develop a selection index model based on factor analysis and select tolerant doubled-haploid lines under high salinity conditions. The experimental design used was a split-plot design with salinity stress treatments as the main plot, i.e., normal (0 mM NaCl) and saline (25 mM NaCl ~ 5.6–5.8 dS/m) and 42 genotypes as the subplot. The genotypes consisted of 36 doubled-haploid lines, four commercial varieties, and two check varieties. The results indicated that a salinity selection index model involving yield and productive tiller traits could be used for selecting rice genotypes tolerant to salinity stress in soil artificial screening. This index which was developed through a combination of factor analysis, stress tolerance index (STI), and path analyses have identified 15 doubled haploid rice lines which were considered as good tolerant lines under salinity stress in soil artificial screening.

    Citation: Muhammad Fuad Anshori, Bambang Sapta Purwoko, Iswari Saraswati Dewi, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Sintho Wahyuning Ardie. Salinity tolerance selection of doubled-haploid rice lines based on selection index and factor analysis[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 520-535. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022032

    Related Papers:

  • The development of tolerant rice varieties using doubled-haploid technology is necessary to speed up the release of a variety tolerant to salinity stress. However, this requires a reliable screening method and selection index model for enhancing selection effectiveness. One approach is through the development of a selection index based on factor analysis under soil salinity screening in the greenhouse. The objective of this study was to develop a selection index model based on factor analysis and select tolerant doubled-haploid lines under high salinity conditions. The experimental design used was a split-plot design with salinity stress treatments as the main plot, i.e., normal (0 mM NaCl) and saline (25 mM NaCl ~ 5.6–5.8 dS/m) and 42 genotypes as the subplot. The genotypes consisted of 36 doubled-haploid lines, four commercial varieties, and two check varieties. The results indicated that a salinity selection index model involving yield and productive tiller traits could be used for selecting rice genotypes tolerant to salinity stress in soil artificial screening. This index which was developed through a combination of factor analysis, stress tolerance index (STI), and path analyses have identified 15 doubled haploid rice lines which were considered as good tolerant lines under salinity stress in soil artificial screening.



    加载中


    [1] Rumanti IA, Hairmansis A, Nugraha Y, et al. (2018) Development of tolerant rice varieties for stress-prone ecosystems in the coastal deltas of Indonesia. Field Crops Res 223: 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.006
    [2] Rhaman MS, Tahjib-Ul-Arif, Kibria MG, et al. (2021) Climate change and its adverse impacts on plant growth in South Asia: Current status and upcoming challenges. Phyton Int J Exp Bot 91: 695–711.
    [3] Martínez ML, Intralawan A, Vázquez G, et al. (2007) The costs of our world: Ecological, economic and social importance. Field Crops Res 63: 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.022
    [4] Sopandie D (2014) Fisiologi Adaptasi Tanaman terhadap Cekaman Abiotik pada Agroekosistem Tropika. IPB Press, Bogor, Indonesia, 69–74 (In Indonesian).
    [5] İbrahimova U, Kumari P, Yadav S, et al. (2021) Progress in understanding salt stress response in plants using biotechnological tools. J Biotechnol 329:180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.02.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.02.007
    [6] Tavakkoli E, Fatehi F, Rengasamy P, et al. (2012) A comparison of hydroponic and soil-based screening methods to identify salt tolerance in the field in barley. J Exp Bot 63: 3853–3868. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers085 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers085
    [7] Rad HE, Aref F, Rezaei M (2012) Response of rice to different salinity levels during different growth stage. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4: 3040–3047.
    [8] Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, Khumaida N (2010) Rice anther culture to obtain doubled-haploids with multiple tolerances. Asia Pacific J Mol Biol Biotechnol 18: 55–57.
    [9] Wolko J, Dobrzycka A, Bocianowski J, et al. (2020) Genetic variation of traits affecting meal quality in black × yellow seeded doubled haploid population of winter oilseed rape. Agron Res 18: 2259–2270.
    [10] Dewi IS, Purwoko BS (2012) Kultur antera untuk percepatan perakitan varietas padi di Indonesia. Jurnal AgroBiogen 8: 78–88. (In Indonesian). https://doi.org/10.21082/jbio.v8n2.2012.p78-88 doi: 10.21082/jbio.v8n2.2012.p78-88
    [11] Hidayatullah A, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2018) Agronomic performance and yield of doubled haploid rice lines in advanced yield trial. SABRAO J Breed Genet 50: 242–253.
    [12] Ismail AM, Platten JD, Miro B (2013) Physiological bases of tolerance of abiotic stresses in rice and mechanisms of adaptation. Oryza 50: 91–99.
    [13] Ghosh B, Ali Md N, Saikat G (2016) Response of rice under salinity stress: A review update. J Res Rice 4: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4338.1000167 doi: 10.4172/2375-4338.1000167
    [14] Hariadi YC, Nurhayati AY, Soeparjono S, et al. (2014) Screening six varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for salinity tolerance. Proc Environ Sci 28: 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.012
    [15] Safitri H, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS et al. (2016a) Morpho-physiological response of rice genotypes grown under saline conditions. J Int Soc Southeast Asian Agric Sci 22: 52–63.
    [16] Souleymane O, Nartey E, Manneh B, et al. (2016) Phenotypic variability of 20 rice genotypes under salt stress. Int J Plant Breed Genet 10: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2016.45.51 doi: 10.3923/ijpbg.2016.45.51
    [17] Kopittke PM, Blamey FPC, Kinraide TB, et al. (2011) Separating multiple, short-term, deleterious effects of saline solutions on the growth of cowpea seedlings. New Phytol 189: 1110–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03551.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03551.x
    [18] Mansuri SM, Jelodar NB, Bagheri N (2012) Evaluation of rice genotypes to salt stress in different growth stages via phenotypic and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker assisted selection. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 9362–9372. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.149 doi: 10.5897/AJB11.149
    [19] Akbar MR, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2021) Agronomic and yield selection of doubled haploid lines of rainfed lowland rice in advanced yield trials. Biodiversitas 22: 3006–3012. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220754 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d220754
    [20] Anshori MF, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2019) Selection index based on multivariate analysis for selecting doubled-haploid rice lines in lowland saline prone area. SABRAO J Breed Genet 51: 161–174.
    [21] Anshori MF, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2021) A new approach to select doubled haploid rice lines under salinity stress using indirect selection index. Rice Sci 28: 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2021.05.007
    [22] Acquaah G (2007) Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom, 716–718.
    [23] Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, et al. (2013) Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36: 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
    [24] Farid M, Nasaruddin, Musa Y, et al. (2020) Genetic parameters and multivariate analysis to determine secondary traits in selecting wheat mutant adaptive on tropical lowlands. Plant Breed Biotechnol 8: 368–377. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2020.8.4.368 doi: 10.9787/PBB.2020.8.4.368
    [25] Mattjik AA, Sumertajaya IM (2011) Multivariate Analysis Using SAS. FMIPA IPB, Bogor, 119–134 (In Indonesian).
    [26] Godshalk EB, Timothy EB (1988) Factor and principal component analyses as alternatives to index selection. Theor Appl Genet 76: 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265334 doi: 10.1007/BF00265334
    [27] Rocha JRDADC, Machado JC, Carneiro FCS (2018) Multitraits index based on factor analysis and ideotype-design: Proposal and application on elephant grass breeding for bioenergy. Bioenergy 10: 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12443 doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12443
    [28] Safitri H, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2016b) Anther culture to obtain rice lines tolerant to salinity. J Agron Indones 44: 221–227.
    [29] Anshori MF, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, et al. (2018) Determination of selection criteria for screening of rice genotypes for salinity tolerance. SABRAO J Breed Genet 50: 279–294.
    [30] Kassahun BM, Alemaw G, Tesfaye B (2013) Correlation studies and path coefficient analysis for seed yield and yield components in Ethiopian coriander accessions. Afr Crop Sci J 21: 51–59.
    [31] Manjunatha GA, Kumar MS, Jayashree M (2017) Character association and path analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes evaluated under organic management. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6: 1053–1058.
    [32] Fernandez GCJ (1992) Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan, 257–270.
    [33] Rawlings JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA (1998) Applied Regression Analysis: a Research Tool, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, New York, United State, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98890
    [34] Singh RK, Chaundhary B (2007) Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publisher, New Delhi, India, 69–78.
    [35] Alvarado G, López M, Vargas M, et al. (2015) META-R (multi environment trial analysis with R for windows) version 6.04. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10201.
    [36] Mendiburu F, Yaseen M (2020) Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.4.0. Available from: https://myaseen208.github.io/agricolae/https://cran.rproject.org/package=agricolae.
    [37] Al-Amin M, Islam MM, Begum SN, et al. (2013) Evaluation of rice germplasm under salt stress at the seedling stage through SSR markers. Int J Agric Res, Innovation Technol 3: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v3i1.16093 doi: 10.3329/ijarit.v3i1.16093
    [38] Al-Naggar AMM, Sabry SRS, Atta MMM, et al. (2015) Effects of salinity on performance, heritability, selection gain and correlations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) doubled haploids. Sci Agric 10: 70–83. https://doi.org/10.15192/PSCP.SA.2015.10.2.7083 doi: 10.15192/PSCP.SA.2015.10.2.7083
    [39] Horváth É, Gombos B, Széles A (2021) Evaluation phenology, yield and quality of maize genotypes in drought stress and non-stress environments. Agron Res 19: 408–422.
    [40] Tobi G, Bahloul YE, Oumouss S, et al. (2021) Productivity, heritability and stability analysis of a Moroccan sugar beet germplasm. Agron Res 19: 612–628.
    [41] Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma SK, Gautama RK, et al. (2014) Path and association analysis and stress indices for salinity tolerance traits in promising rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 42: 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.2013.0067 doi: 10.1556/CRC.2013.0067
    [42] Mohammadi R, Mendioro MS, Diaz GQ, et al. (2014) Genetic analysis of salt tolerance at seedling and reproductive stages in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Breed 133: 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12210 doi: 10.1111/pbr.12210
    [43] Yadav P, Singh P, Harishcandra, et al. (2018) Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of thirty rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes in saline and normal condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7: 1531–1539.
    [44] Garg HS, Kumar R, Kumar B, et al. (2017) Screening and identification of rice genotypes with drought tolerance under stress and non-stress condition. Int J Chem Stud 5: 1031–1042.
    [45] Georgieva N, Nikolova I, Kosev V (2015) Stability analysis for seed yield in vetch cultivars. Emirates J Food Agric 27: 903–910. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015-04-172 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2015-04-172
    [46] Manjunatha GA, Kumar MS, Jayashree M (2017) Character association and path analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes evaluated under organic management. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6: 1053–1058.
    [47] Petil MK, Lokesha R (2018) Estimation of genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, correlations and path analysis in advanced mutant breeding lines of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J Pharmacogn Nat Prod 4: 1000151. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-0992.1000151 doi: 10.4172/2472-0992.1000151
    [48] Hosseini SJ, Sarvestani ZT, Pirdashti H (2012) Analysis of tolerance indices in some rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes at salt stress condition. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 3: 1–10.
    [49] Singh S, Sengar RS, Kulshreshtha N, et al. (2015) Assessment of multiple tolerance indices for salinity stress in bread wheat (Triticum aesticum L.). J Agric Sci 7: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n3p49 doi: 10.5539/jas.v7n3p49
    [50] Hakam M, Sudarno S, Hoyyi A (2015) Analisis jalur terhadap faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi indeks prestasi kumulatif (IPK) mahasiswa statistika UNDIP. J Gaussian 4: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.14710/j.gauss.v4i1.8146 doi: 10.14710/j.gauss.v4i1.8146
    [51] Wang K, Chen Z (2016) Stepwise regression and all possible subsets regression in education. Elec Int J Eng Educ 2: 60–81.
    [52] Fadhli N, Farid M, Rafiuddin, et al. (2020) Multivariate analysis to determine secondary trait in selecting adaptive hybrid corn lines under drought stress. Biodiversitas 21: 3617–3624. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210826 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210826
    [53] Farid M, Nasaruddin, Musa Y, et al. (2021) Effective screening of tropical wheat mutant lines under hydroponically induced drought stress using multivariate analysis approach. Asian J Plant Sci 20: 172–182. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2021.172.182 doi: 10.3923/ajps.2021.172.182
    [54] Yong AG, Pearce S (2013) A beginner's guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol 9: 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079 doi: 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
    [55] Sabouri H, Rabiei B, Fazlalipour M (2008) Use of selection indices based on multivariate analysis for improving grain yield in rice. Rice Sci 15: 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(09)60008-1 doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(09)60008-1
    [56] Jahufer MZZ, Casler MD (2015) Application of the Smith-Hazel selection index for improving biomass yield and quality of switchgrass. Crop Sci 55: 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0575 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0575
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1541) PDF downloads(195) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog