Improve pineapples growth by nano-membranes accessory and under stress condition in far north of Taiwan

Dinh Thi Hong Thanh; Yu Kaung Chang; Son Zuang Chen; Hsiao Dao Chang; Dinh Thi Hong Thanh; Yu Kaung Chang; Son Zuang Chen; Hsiao Dao Chang

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2021049

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2021, Volume 6, Issue 3: 799-817. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021049

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Topical Sections

Improve pineapples growth by nano-membranes accessory and under stress condition in far north of Taiwan

1.
Institute of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, 24301, Taishan Dist., Taiwan, R.O.C.
2.
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Da'an Dist., Taipei City 106335, Taiwan, R.O.C.
3.
Research Center for Biochemical and Bioengineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, 24301, Taishan Dist., Taiwan, R.O.C.
4.
Archin Automatic Installation Control Co., Ltd., Guishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan, R.O.C

Received: 03 March 2021 Accepted: 15 July 2021 Published: 10 August 2021

The dual layers of Nano-membranes barrier, could succeeded in regulation nutrient element and control water-borne disease by improving aerations through added dual layers of nano-membranes, this plantation model provide concept of providing hydrophilic properties and 500 nm pore size believed to be much precision tools for agricultural utilization. This rebuilding of pineapple cultivation was optimized in green-house with natural ventilation, Optimized humidity and free watering were properly practiced by implement of diffusion cage for a novel revealed boundary effect by 500 nm mold inject product. Effect indicated as indicated: Cellulose, PBT, CTA in sequence have better boundary effects over limiting the diffusion of nitrate, phosphate, and a small part of potassium in the root boundary regime through proper moisture with 0.5–0.8 L/pot button irrigation, The intensity of boundary effect were revealed in kinetic analysis follow in sequence: EC (1500 mg L⁻¹) > > nitrate (300 mg L⁻¹) > TPO (2.5 mg L⁻¹), while highly fluctuate for TPO. Then indication of hydrophilic PBT was better than PP was verified in barrier model. In the growth stage, separate initial I–III for direct releasing from the fertilizer and III–VI for hydrolysis & secretion of nutrient, especially for TPO anion form, indicate highly ion charged or polar attraction exerted. While phosphate was delivered slowly, the organic practice was found promising in deliver and uptake to the final two or three stage for flowering and fruiting. The verification of deliver of nutrient by double caged box in the rhigime zone, indicated effective in lowered the damping off/nematode syndrome, which opened the extension cropping in suboptimal area for pineapples. The success of growth character improved by control disease and pest, reach complete maturation. Under 80 % of final fruiting, the balance analysis show consistence in expectation for Pya (wild) > Pyc (hybrid) > Pyb (interbreed).
- cellulose,
- polybutylene terephthalate (PBT),
- cellulose triacetate (CTA),
- hydrophilic,
- microbial community,
- nano-membranes,
- dual layer diffusion barrier,
- nutrient regulation,
- disease control
Citation: Dinh Thi Hong Thanh, Yu Kaung Chang, Son Zuang Chen, Hsiao Dao Chang. Improve pineapples growth by nano-membranes accessory and under stress condition in far north of Taiwan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(3): 799-817. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021049

Related Papers:

Abstract

The dual layers of Nano-membranes barrier, could succeeded in regulation nutrient element and control water-borne disease by improving aerations through added dual layers of nano-membranes, this plantation model provide concept of providing hydrophilic properties and 500 nm pore size believed to be much precision tools for agricultural utilization. This rebuilding of pineapple cultivation was optimized in green-house with natural ventilation, Optimized humidity and free watering were properly practiced by implement of diffusion cage for a novel revealed boundary effect by 500 nm mold inject product. Effect indicated as indicated: Cellulose, PBT, CTA in sequence have better boundary effects over limiting the diffusion of nitrate, phosphate, and a small part of potassium in the root boundary regime through proper moisture with 0.5–0.8 L/pot button irrigation, The intensity of boundary effect were revealed in kinetic analysis follow in sequence: EC (1500 mg L⁻¹) > > nitrate (300 mg L⁻¹) > TPO (2.5 mg L⁻¹), while highly fluctuate for TPO. Then indication of hydrophilic PBT was better than PP was verified in barrier model. In the growth stage, separate initial I–III for direct releasing from the fertilizer and III–VI for hydrolysis & secretion of nutrient, especially for TPO anion form, indicate highly ion charged or polar attraction exerted. While phosphate was delivered slowly, the organic practice was found promising in deliver and uptake to the final two or three stage for flowering and fruiting. The verification of deliver of nutrient by double caged box in the rhigime zone, indicated effective in lowered the damping off/nematode syndrome, which opened the extension cropping in suboptimal area for pineapples. The success of growth character improved by control disease and pest, reach complete maturation. Under 80 % of final fruiting, the balance analysis show consistence in expectation for Pya (wild) > Pyc (hybrid) > Pyb (interbreed).

References

[1]	Orluchukwu J, Adedokun O (2015) Response of Growth and Yield of Pineapple (Ananas comosus) on Spent Mushroom Substrates and Inorganic Fertilizer in South—South, Nigeria. Int J Plant & Soil Sci 8: 1-5.
[2]	Aziz D, Martin N, Rahmat A (2017) Relationship of soil physicochemical properties and existence of Phytophthora sp. in pineapple plantations. IJoST 2: 81-86. doi: 10.17509/ijost.v2i1.5991
[3]	Dromantien R, Pranckietien I, Jodaugien D, et al. (2020) The influence of various forms of nitrogen fertilization and meteorological factors on nitrogen compounds in soil under laboratory conditions. Agronomy 10: 2011. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10122011
[4]	Liang D, Ouyang Y, Tiemann L, et al. (2020) Niche Differentiation of Bacterial Versus Archaeal Soil Nitrifiers Induced by Ammonium Inhibition Along a Management Gradient. Front Microbiol 11: 568588 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.568588
[5]	Li YK, Xue XZ, Guo WZ, et al. (2019) Soil moisture and nitrate-nitrogen dynamics and economic yield in the greenhouse cultivation of tomato and cucumber under negative pressure irrigation in the North China Plain. Sci Rep 9: 4439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38695-4
[6]	Heuermann D, Hahn H, Von Wirén N (2021) Seed yield and nitrogen efficiency in oilseed rape after ammonium nitrate or urea fertilization. Front Plant Sci 27: 608785. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.608785
[7]	Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extremes 10: 4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
[8]	Robinson D, Peterkin JH (2019) Clothing the emperor: dynamic root-shoot allocation trajectories in relation to whole-plant growth rate and in response to temperature. Plants 8:212. doi: 10.3390/plants8070212
[9]	Liang YW, Li YS (2016) Leaf and root growth, carbon and nitrogen contents, and gene expression of perennial ryegrass to different nitrogen supplies. J Amer. Soc. Hort Sci 141: 555-562. doi: 10.21273/JASHS03883-16
[10]	Cerqueira Sales MD, Fernandez PMB, Ventura JA, et al. (2015) Antifungal activity of plant extracts with potential to control plant pathogens in pineapple. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6:1-6.
[11]	Burgess TI, Lopez Villamor A, Paap T, et al. (2021) Towards a best pracftice methodology for the detection of Phytopathora species in soils. Plant Pathol 70: 604-614 doi: 10.1111/ppa.13312
[12]	Rop K, Karuku GN, Mbui D, et al. (2019) Evaluating the effects of formulated nano-NPK slow-release fertilizer composite on the performance and yield of maize, kale, and capsicum. Ann Agric Sci 64: 9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2019.05.010
[13]	Jakšić Z, Matovic J (2010) Functionalization of artificial freestanding composite nanomembranes. Materials 3: 165-200. doi: 10.3390/ma3010165
[14]	Martin CR, Kohli P (2003) The emerging field of nanotube biotechnology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 29-37. doi: 10.1038/nrd988
[15]	Lndskron K, Hatton BD, Perovic DD, et al. (2003) Periodic mesoporous organosilicas containing interconnected [Si(CH₂)]₃ rings. Science 302: 266-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1084973
[16]	Chu KL (2006) An improved miniature direct formic acid fuel cell based on nano porous silicon for portable power generation. J Electrochem Soc 153: 1562-1567. doi: 10.1149/1.2207729
[17]	Mohammad AW, Teow YH, Ang WL, et al. (2015) Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects. Desalination 356: 226-254. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043
[18]	Wadekar SS, Vidic RD (1990) Influence of active layer on separation potentials of nano filtration membrane for inorganic ions. Environ Sci Technol 51: 5658-5665. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05973
[19]	Va der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2003) Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environl Pollu 122: 435-445. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-1
[20]	Sokolnicki AM, Fisher RJ, Harrah TP, et al. (2006) Permeability of bacterial cellulose membranes. J Membr Sci 272: 15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.065
[21]	Li TA, Lin JH, Bao L (2020) Polypropylene/thermoplastic polyurethane blends: mechanical characterizations, recyclability, and sustainable development of thermoplastic materials. J Mater Res Technol 9: 5304-5312. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.056
[22]	Wang L, Lin S (2019) Mechanism of selective ion removal in membrane capacitive deionization for water softening. Environ Sci Technol 53: 5797−5804. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00655
[23]	Mahmud K, Panday D, Mergoum A, et al. (2021) Nitrogen losses and potential mitigation strategies for a sustainable agroecosystem. Sustainability 13: 2400. doi: 10.3390/su13042400
[24]	Skider A, Pearce AK, Parkinson SJ, et al. Recent trends in advanced polymer materials in agriculture related applications. ACS Appl Polum Mater 3: 1203-1217.
[25]	Zhang QY, Yang P, Liu LS, et al. (2020) Formulation and characterization of a heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification synthetic microbial community and its application to livestock wastewater treatment. Water 12: 218. doi: 10.3390/w12010218
[26]	Mao W, Allington G, Li YL, et al. (2012) Life history strategy influences biomass allocation in response to limiting nutrients and water in an arid system. Pol J Ecol 60: 545-557.
[27]	Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J (2000) The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspect Plant Eco Evo Sys 3: 115-127. doi: 10.1078/1433-8319-00007
[28]	Ashekuzzaman SM, Richards K, Ellis S, et al. (2018) Risk assessment of E. coli survival up to the grazing exclusion period after dairy slurry, cattle dung, and biosolids application to grassland. Front Sustain Food Syst 10: 34.
[29]	Agathokleous E, Belz RG, Kitao M, et al. (2019) Does the root to shoot ration show a hormetic response to stress? An ecological and environmental perspective. J For Res 30: 1569-1580. doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0863-7
[30]	Nie X, Yang Y, Yang L, et al. (2016) Above and below ground biomass allocation in shrub biomes across the northeast Tibetan planteau. Plos One 11: e0154251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154251
[31]	Striemer CC, Gaborski TR, McGrath JL, et al. (2007) Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes. Nature 445: 749-53. doi: 10.1038/nature05532
[32]	Liu, TY, Wang P, Wang M, et al. (2015) Ion-responsive channels of zwitterion-carbon nanotube membrane for rapid water permeation and ultrahigh mono-/multivalent ion selectivity. ACS Nano 9: 7488-7496. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02598
[33]	Chojnacka K, Moustakas K, Krowiak AW (2020) Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy. Biores Technol 295: 122223. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223
[34]	Smail F, Arous O, Amara M (2013) A competitive transport across polymeric membranes. Study of complexation and separation of ions. Comptes Rendus Chimie 16: 605-612.
[35]	Rall D, Menne D, Schweidtmann AM (2019) Rational design of ion separation membranes. J Membr Sci 569: 209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.013
[36]	Ha J, Fu J, Schoch RB (2008) Molecular sieving using nanofilters: past, present, and future. Lab Chip 8: 23-33. doi: 10.1039/B714128A
[37]	Amoo AE, Babalola OO (2017) Ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms: Key players in the promotion of plant growth. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17: 935-947. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162017000400008
[38]	Shock CC, Pereira AB, Eldredge EP (2007a) Irrigation best management practices for potato. Amer J Potato Res 84: 29-37.
[39]	Miao Wang M, Meng H, Wang D (2019) Dynamic curvature nanochannel-based membrane with anomalous ionic transport behaviors and reversible rectification switch. Adv Mater 31: e1805130. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805130
[40]	Saey BR, Frederick LR, Bartholomew WV (1969) The formation of nitrate from ammonium nitrogen in soils: IV. use of the delay and maximum rate phases for making quantitative predictions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 33: 276-278.
[41]	Thangarajan R, Bolan NS, Naidu R, et al. (2015) Effects of temperature and amnedments on nitrogen mineralization in selected Australian soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22: 8843-8854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2191-y
[42]	Skuodiene R, Tomchuk D (2015) Root mass and root to shoot ratio of different perennial forage plants under western Lithuania climatic conditions. Romanian agricultural research romanian agricultural researchrom. Agric Res 32: 209-219.
[43]	Cahill Jr JF (2002) What evidence is necessary in studies which separate root and shoot competition along productivity gradients? J Ecol 90: 201-205.
[44]	Skorczewaski PZ, Jan Mudryk M, Jankowska P, et al. (2013) Antibiotic resistance of neustonic and planktonic fecal coliform bacteria isolated from tow water basins differing in the level of pollution. Hidrobilogica 23: 431-443.
[45]	Zhang MY, Pan LQ, Liu LP, et al. (2002) Phosphorus and nitrogen removal by a novel phosphate-accumulating organism, Arthrobacter sp. HHEP5 capable of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification: Safety assessment, removal characterization, mechanism exploration and wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol 312: 123633.
[46]	Fongaro G, Garcia-Gonzalez MC, Hernandez M, et al. (2017) Different behavior of enteric bacteria and viruses in clay and sandy soils after biofertilization with swine digestate. Front Microbiol 31: 74.
[47]	Muriuki JK, Kuria AW, Muthuri CW, et al. (2014) Testing Biodegradable Seedling Containers as an Alternative for Polythene Tubes in Tropical Small-Scale Tree nurseries. Small-scale Forestry: 13: 127-142. doi: 10.1007/s11842-013-9245-3
[48]	Wang LL, Xie X, Wang M, et al. (2019) EDTA-based adsorption layer for mitigating FO membrane fouling via in situ removing calcium binding with organic foulants. J Membr Sci 578: 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.047
[49]	Verma SK, White JF, Sahu PK, et al. (2021) Endophyte roles in nutrient acquisition, root system architecture development and oxidative stress tolerance. J Appl Microb 2021: 15111. doi: 10.1111/jam.15111

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)