Spillover effects represent a difficult-to-measure externality resulting from the localization of foreign capital in the host economy. Despite their character of externality, spillover effects represent a public interest. The governments of many transitional economies spend financial resources in the form of investment incentives to support economic growth and spillover effects from the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI). However, there is still no established methodology for regularly measuring spillover effects. This article tries to fill this gap. It aims to measure the spillover effects of FDI localization in the host business environment with the possibility of identifying differences in their size and development on the level of regions within the host economy — in the case of the Czech Republic. Based on shift-share analyses, an indicator quantifying the size of the technology gap at the regional level has been constructed. The benchmarking method illustrates the absorption capacity of the business environment in an interregional comparison reflecting the strong and weak sides of the regions in terms of absorbing the benefits of locating multinational corporations in their territories. The spillover effect was evaluated based on five criteria: gross value added (GVA), technology gap level, investment in research and development (R&D), share of people with secondary and higher education and inflow of FDI. The higher the value of the constructed Spillover index achieved in the region, the higher the positive effect of FDI on economic development. The spillover effects were evaluated within the years 2002–2021 and assessed the impact of 211 FDI on the economic development of five regions of the Czech Republic. Calculations showed that the strength and magnitude of spillover effects fully reflect the weaknesses of peripheral regions. The methodology offers policymakers a tool (indicator) for improving the targeting of institutional support in relation to economic growth and the development of the business environment.
Citation: Sylvie Kotíková. 2023: Spillover effects: A challenging public interest to measure, National Accounting Review, 5(4): 373-404. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2023022
Spillover effects represent a difficult-to-measure externality resulting from the localization of foreign capital in the host economy. Despite their character of externality, spillover effects represent a public interest. The governments of many transitional economies spend financial resources in the form of investment incentives to support economic growth and spillover effects from the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI). However, there is still no established methodology for regularly measuring spillover effects. This article tries to fill this gap. It aims to measure the spillover effects of FDI localization in the host business environment with the possibility of identifying differences in their size and development on the level of regions within the host economy — in the case of the Czech Republic. Based on shift-share analyses, an indicator quantifying the size of the technology gap at the regional level has been constructed. The benchmarking method illustrates the absorption capacity of the business environment in an interregional comparison reflecting the strong and weak sides of the regions in terms of absorbing the benefits of locating multinational corporations in their territories. The spillover effect was evaluated based on five criteria: gross value added (GVA), technology gap level, investment in research and development (R&D), share of people with secondary and higher education and inflow of FDI. The higher the value of the constructed Spillover index achieved in the region, the higher the positive effect of FDI on economic development. The spillover effects were evaluated within the years 2002–2021 and assessed the impact of 211 FDI on the economic development of five regions of the Czech Republic. Calculations showed that the strength and magnitude of spillover effects fully reflect the weaknesses of peripheral regions. The methodology offers policymakers a tool (indicator) for improving the targeting of institutional support in relation to economic growth and the development of the business environment.
| [1] | Agosin MR, Mayer R (2000) Foreign Investment in Developing Countries: Does It Crowd in Domestic Investment. |
| [2] | Albuquerque P, Lopes J (2015) Aging, Employment and Salaries in the Portuguese Regions: A Shift-Share Analysis. EURE 41: 239–260. |
| [3] |
Alfaro L (2017) Gains from Foreign Direct Investment: Macro and Micro Approaches. World Bank Econ Rev 30: S2–S15. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw007 doi: 10.1093/wber/lhw007
|
| [4] | Amin A, Thrift N (1995) Globalization, Institutional Thickness and the Local Economy, In: Healey, P., Camerson, S., Davoudi, S., et al., Managing Cities: The New Urban Kontext, Chichester: Wiley, 322. |
| [5] |
Barasa L, Knoben J, Vermeulen P, et al. (2017) Institutions, Resources and Innovation in East Africa: A Firm Level Approach. Res Policy 46: 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008
|
| [6] |
Barrios S, Görg H, Strobl E (2011) Spillovers through Backward Linkages from Multinationals: Measurement Matters! Eur Econ Rev 55: 862–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.10.002
|
| [7] |
Benáček V, Lenihan H, Andreosso-O'Callaghan B, et al. (2014) Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: How Do They Relate in Various European Countries? World Econ 37: 625–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12112 doi: 10.1111/twec.12112
|
| [8] | Benáček V, Víšek J (2000) Determining Factors and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in an Economy in Transition: Evidence from Czech Manufacturing in 1991–1997, In: ICSEAD Conference on Transition, 1st Ed., Budapest: ICSEAD. |
| [9] |
Bitzer J, Geishecker O, Görg H (2008) Productivity Spillovers through Vertical Linkages: Evidence from 17 OECD Countries. Econ Lett 99: 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.07.015 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.07.015
|
| [10] | Blažek J, Květoň V (2023) Towards an Integrated Framework of Agency in Regional Development: The Case of Old Industrial Regions. Reg Stud 57: 1482–1497. |
| [11] | Blažek J, Uhlíř D (2011) Teorie regionálního rozvoje: nástin, kritika, implikace. |
| [12] |
Blomström M, Kokko A, Zejan M (1994) Host Country Competition, Labor Skills, and Technology-Transfer by Multidimensionals. Rev World Econ 130: 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707611 doi: 10.1007/BF02707611
|
| [13] |
Blomström M, Kokko A (1998) Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. J Econ Surv 12: 247–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00056 doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00056
|
| [14] |
Bogataj D, Bogataj M, Drobne S (2019) Interactions between Flows of Human Resources in Fluctional Regions and Flows of Investors in Dynamic Processes of Global Supply Chains. Int J Prod Econ 209: 2015–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.018
|
| [15] | Boudeville JR (1974) Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Reprint. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. |
| [16] |
Burger A, Damijan J P, Kostevc Č, et al. (2017) Determinants of Firm Performance and Growth during Economic Recession: The Case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Econ Syst 41: 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.05.003
|
| [17] |
Bywalec G (2019) Foreign Direct Investment in the Indian Economy. Polish J Econ 298: 149–174. https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/108605 doi: 10.33119/GN/108605
|
| [18] |
Cantwell J (2017) Innovation and International Business. Ind Innov 24: 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1257422 doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1257422
|
| [19] |
Caves R (1974) Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-Country Markets. Economica 41: 176–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2553765 doi: 10.2307/2553765
|
| [20] |
Choi H (2018) Does FDI Crowd out Domestic Firms? Micro-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea. J Korea Trade 22: 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-02-2018-0011 doi: 10.1108/JKT-02-2018-0011
|
| [21] |
Cieślak I, Pawlewicz K, Pawlewicz A (2019) Sustainable Development in Polish Regions: A Shift-Share Analysis. Pol J Environ Stud 28: 565–575. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/85206 doi: 10.15244/pjoes/85206
|
| [22] |
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (2015) Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D. Econ J 125: 546–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763 doi: 10.2307/2233763
|
| [23] |
Colen, L, Persyn D, Guariso A (2016) Bilateral Investment Treaties and FDI: Does the Sector Matter? World Dev 83: 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.020
|
| [24] | Cortright J (2001) New Growth Theory, Technology and Learning. Available from: https://e-tcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Cortright-nueva_teoria_del_crecimiento.pdf. |
| [25] |
Crespo N, Fontoura MP (2007) Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers — What Do We Really Know? World Dev 35: 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.04.001
|
| [26] |
Crespo N, Fontoura MP, Proença I (2009) FDI Spillovers at Regional Level: Evidence from Portugal. Pap Reg Sci 88: 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00225.x doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00225.x
|
| [27] |
Čuhlová R, Potužáková Z (2017) Highly Qualified in the Czech Republic. J Int Stud 10: 159–172. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/11 doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/11
|
| [28] | Czech National Bank: Česká Národní Banka, 2023. Available from: https://www.cnb.cz/cs/. |
| [29] | Czech Statistical Office: Český Statistický Úřad, 2023. Available from: https://www.czso.cz/. |
| [30] | CzechInvest: CzechInvest, 2023. Available from: http://www.czechinvest.org/investicni-pobidky-czechinvest. |
| [31] | Damijan JP, Majcen B, Rojec M (2013) Impact of Firm Heterogeneity on Direct and Spillover Effects of FDI: Micro-Evidence from Ten Transition Countries. J Comp Econ 41: 895–922. |
| [32] |
Dicken P, Coe N, Hess M (2008) Global Production Network: Realizing the Potential. J Econ Geogr 8: 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn002 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn002
|
| [33] | Dobrzanski P (2019) Productivity Performance of the Czech Republic - Shift-Share Analysis. In: Loster T., Pavelka T., 13th International Days of Statistics And Economics, Slaný: Melandrium, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.18267/pr.2019.los.186.31 |
| [34] |
Driffield N, Hughes D (2003) Foreign and Domestic Investment: Regional Development or Crowding Out? Reg Stud 37: 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065433 doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065433
|
| [35] |
Driffield N, Love JH (2007) Linking FDI Motivation and Host Economy Productivity Effects: Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. J Int Bus Stud 38: 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400268 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400268
|
| [36] |
Du J, Girma S, Görg H, Stepanok I (2023) Who Wins and Who Loses from State Subsidies? Can J Econ 56: 1007–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12644 doi: 10.1111/caje.12644
|
| [37] | Dunning JH (1981) International Production and the Multinational Entreprise. J Int Bus Stud 1981: 171–173. |
| [38] | Dunning, John H., and Sarianna M. Lundan. 2008a. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. 2nd ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. |
| [39] |
Esteban J (2000) Regional Convergence in Europe and the Industry Mix: A Shift-Share Analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 30: 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00035-1 doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00035-1
|
| [40] |
Fagerberg AJ (1987) A technology Gap Approach to Growth Rates Bigger. Res Policy 16: 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4 doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4
|
| [41] |
Fagerberg AJ, Lundvall BA, Srholec M (2018) Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development. Eur J Dev Res 30: 533–556. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0147-2 doi: 10.1057/s41287-018-0147-2
|
| [42] |
Finlay R (1978) Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investments and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model. Q J Econ 92: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885996 doi: 10.2307/1885996
|
| [43] |
Fonseca FJ, Llamosas-Rosas I (2019) Spatial Linkages and Third-Region Effects: Evidence from Manufacturing FDI in Mexico. Ann Reg Sci 62: 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00895-1 doi: 10.1007/s00168-019-00895-1
|
| [44] |
Gambus I, Almeida F (2018) Three Decades after James Street's. "The Institutionalist Theory of Economic Development": What Does Institutional Approach to Economic Development Mean Today? J Econ Issues 52: 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1469902 doi: 10.1080/00213624.2018.1469902
|
| [45] |
Görg H, Greenaway D (2004) Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? World Bank Res Obs 19: 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkh019 doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkh019
|
| [46] |
Govori F, Fejzullahu A (2020) External Financial Flows and GDP Growth. J Dev Soc 36: 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X19898964 doi: 10.1177/0169796X19898964
|
| [47] |
Greenaway D, Sousa N, Wakelin K (2004) Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export from Multinationals? Eur J Polit Econ 20: 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.12.006
|
| [48] |
Grech P (2017) Undesired properties of the European Commission's refugee distribution key. Eur Union Polit 18: 212–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516649244 doi: 10.1177/1465116516649244
|
| [49] |
Grossman GM, Helpman E (1994) Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. J Econ Perspect 8: 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23 doi: 10.1257/jep.8.1.23
|
| [50] |
Gutiérrez‐Portilla P, Maza A, Villaverde J (2019) Spatial Linkages in FDI Location: Evidence from the Spanish Regions. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 110: 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12346 doi: 10.1111/tesg.12346
|
| [51] |
Hardy J, Sass M, Fifekova MP (2011) Impacts of Horizontal and Vertical Foreign Investment in Business Services: The Experience of Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Eur Urban Reg Stud 18: 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411422618 doi: 10.1177/0969776411422618
|
| [52] | Havránek T, Hampl M: Foreign Investment and Domestic Productivity in the Czech Republic: A Quantitative Survey, 2018. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/175754 |
| [53] |
Havránek T, Iršová Z (2013) Determinants of Horizontal Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a Large Meta-Analysis. World Dev 42: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.07.001
|
| [54] |
Kokko A, Kravtsova V (2008) Innovative Capability in MNC Subsidiaries: Evidence from Four European Transition Economies. Post-Communist Econ 20: 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370701865722 doi: 10.1080/14631370701865722
|
| [55] |
Konings J (2001) The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies. Econ Transit 9: 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00091 doi: 10.1111/1468-0351.00091
|
| [56] |
Konstandina, Mamica Skenderi, and Geoffrey Gatharia Gachino (2020) International Technology Transfer: Evidence on Foreign Direct Investment in Albania. J Econ Stud 47: 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2018-0076 doi: 10.1108/JES-02-2018-0076
|
| [57] |
Kotíková S (2018) Regional Disparities in the Spillover Effect. Bus Econ Horiz 14: 988–1002. https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.67 doi: 10.15208/beh.2018.67
|
| [58] |
Kotíková S (2019) Potential of the Czech Business Environment Assumes the Effects of Foreign Direct Investment. E M Ekon Manag 22: 18–35. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-002 doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-002
|
| [59] |
Krugman P (2011) The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-Aged. Reg Stud 45: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537127 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.537127
|
| [60] | Leamer E (1994) Models of the Transition in Eastern Europe with Untransferable Eastern Capital. Working Paper No. 12 12: 1–18. |
| [61] | Lenaerts K, Merlevede B (2012) Horizontal or Backward? FDI Spillovers and Industry Aggregation. In: Working Papers. Faculty of Economics and Administration, Ghent University. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Horizontal-or-Backward-FDI-Spillovers-and-Industry-Lenaerts-Merlevede/b410e9b5c6b60ebb8978e5691bdeab5fd21c29fd. |
| [62] |
Lesher M, Miroudot S (2008) FDI Spillovers and Their Interrelationship with Trade. In Trade Policy Woring Papers 80: 40–41. https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873 doi: 10.1787/18166873
|
| [63] |
Li X, Quan R, Stoian MC, et al. (2018) Do MNEs from Developed and Emerging Economies Differ in Their Location Choice of FDI? A 36-Year Review. Int Bus Rev 27: 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.03.012
|
| [64] |
Liu L, Zhao Z, Zhang M, et al. (2021) The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Outward Foreign Direct Investment's Reverse Green Technology Spillover: Crowding out or Facilitation? J Clean Prod 284: 124689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124689 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124689
|
| [65] |
Lucas R (1988) On the Mechanics of Economic Development. J Monet Econ 22: 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
|
| [66] |
Lv D, Gao H, Zhang Y (2021) Rural Economic Development Based on Shift-Share Analysis in a Developing Country: A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province, China. Sustainability 13: 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041969 doi: 10.3390/su13041969
|
| [67] |
Mariotti S, Marzano R (2021) The Effects of Competition Policy, Regulatory Quality and Trust on Inward FDI in Host Countries. Int Bus Rev 30: 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101887 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101887
|
| [68] |
Markowska M, Hlavacek P, Strahl D (2022) Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Employment Structure and Economic Development in EU Regions. Comp Econ Res 25: 109–133. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.32 doi: 10.18778/1508-2008.25.32
|
| [69] |
Markusen JR, Venables AJ (1999) Foreign Direct Investment as a Catalyst for Industrial Development. Eur Econ Rev 43: 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00048-8 doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00048-8
|
| [70] | Martin R, Sunley P (1998) Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Developmennt. Econ Geogr 74: 201–227. |
| [71] |
Massey D (2007) In What Sense a Regional Problem? Reg Stud 41: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701232181 doi: 10.1080/00343400701232181
|
| [72] | Ministry of Justice. 2023. 'Veřejný Rejstřík a Sbírka Listin - Ministerstvo Spravedlnosti České Republiky'. n.d. Accessed 30 September 2023. https://or.justice.cz/ias/ui/rejstrik-$firma. |
| [73] |
Mišun J, Tomšík V (2002) Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd In or Crowd Out Domestic Investment? Eastern Eur Econ 40: 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2012.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2012.01.005
|
| [74] |
Narula R (2017) Emerging Market MNEs as Meta-Integrators: The Importance of Internal Networks. International Int J Technol Manag 74: 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2017.083625 doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2017.083625
|
| [75] |
Naughton H, Norback P-J, Tekin-Koru A (2016) Aggregation Issues of Foreign Direct Investment Estimation in an Interdependent World. World Econ 3: 2046–2073. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12388 doi: 10.1111/twec.12388
|
| [76] |
North DC, Weingast BR (2000) Introduction: Institutional Analysis and Economic History. J Econ Hist 60: 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700025158 doi: 10.1017/S0022050700025158
|
| [77] | OECD: Productivity - GDP per Hour Worked - OECD Data, 2023. Available from: http://data.oecd.org/lprdty/gdp-per-hour-worked.htm. |
| [78] |
Pan WH, Ngo XT (2016) Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Performance: The Moderating Effects of Special Economic Zones. Communist Post-Communist Stud 49: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.04.005
|
| [79] |
Pattnayak SS, Thangavelu SM (2011) Linkages and Technology Spillovers in the Presence of Foreign Firms: Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. J Econ Stud 38: 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581111152391 doi: 10.1108/01443581111152391
|
| [80] |
Pavlínek P (2018) Global Production Networks, Foreign Direct Investment, and Supplier Linkages in the Integrated Peripheries of the Automotive Industry. Econ Geogr 94: 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1393313 doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1393313
|
| [81] |
Pavlínek P, Žížalová P (2016) Linkages and Spillovers in Global Production Networks: Firm-Level Analysis of the Czech Automotive Industry. J Econ Geogr 16: 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu041 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu041
|
| [82] |
Popadynets N, Polishchuk O, Bilyk R, et al. (2023) The Review of Trends and Foreign Direct Investment Estimates in Ukraine and Poland. Manag Theory Stud Rural Bus Infrastruct Dev 46: 166–182. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2023.17 doi: 10.15544/mts.2023.17
|
| [83] | Posner MV (1961) International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Econ Pap 13: 323–341. |
| [84] |
Regelink M, Elhost JP (2015) The Spatial Econometrics of FDI and Third Country Effects. Lett Spat Resour Sci 8: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0125-z doi: 10.1007/s12076-014-0125-z
|
| [85] |
Romer P (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. J Polit Econ 94: 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420 doi: 10.1086/261420
|
| [86] |
Ruault JF, Schaeffer Y (2020) Scalable Shift-Share Analysis: Novel Framework and Application to France. Pap Reg Sci 99: 1667–1690. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12558 doi: 10.1111/pirs.12558
|
| [87] |
Sako M, Zylberberg E (2019) Supplier Strategy in Global Value Chains: Shaping Governance and Profiting from Upgrading. Socio-Econ Rev 17: 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx049 doi: 10.1093/ser/mwx049
|
| [88] |
Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration Economies, Firm Heterogeneity, and FDI in the United States. Strateg Manag J 21: 1175–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.0.CO;2-Q doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1175::AID-SMJ139>3.0.CO;2-Q
|
| [89] |
Sheng R, Zhou R, Zhang Y, Wang Z (2021) Green Investment Changes in China: A Shift-Share Analysis. Int J Env Res Pub Health 18: 6658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126658 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126658
|
| [90] | Šimanová J, Trešl F (2011) Vývoj Průmyslové Koncentrace a Specializace v Regionech NUTS3 České Republiky v Kontextu Dynamizace Regionální Komparativní Výhody. E M Ekon Manag 14: 38–52. |
| [91] |
Sinani E, Meyer K (2004) Spillovers of Technology Transfer from FDI: The Case of Estonia. J Comp Econ 32: 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2004.03.002
|
| [92] |
Szent-Ivanyi B, Vigvári G (2012) Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Soc Econ 34: 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.34.2012.1.5 doi: 10.1556/SocEc.34.2012.1.5
|
| [93] |
Tkalenko S, Derii Z, Butenko N, et al. (2022) Foreign Direct Investments and Economic Growth in the Post-Covid-19 Period: A Causality Analysis for Ukraine. Financ Credit Act 3: 357–366. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3665 doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3665
|
| [94] |
Vernon R (1966) International Investment and International Trade in the Produkt Cycle. Q J Econ 80: 190–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880689 doi: 10.2307/1880689
|
| [95] |
Verspanger B (1991) New Empirical Appeoach to Catching up or Falling Behind. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 2: 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(05)80008-6 doi: 10.1016/S0954-349X(05)80008-6
|
| [96] |
Wang JY, Blomstörm M (1992) Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model. Eur Econ Rev 36: 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90021-N doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90021-N
|
| [97] |
Wang TC, Wang NC, Nguyen X (2016). Evaluating the Influence of Criteria to Attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to Develop Supporting Industries in Vietnam by Utilizing Fuzzy Preference Relations. Sustainability 8: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050447 doi: 10.3390/su8050447
|
| [98] | Watanabe S (1983) Technology Marketing and Industrialization: Linkages between Small and Large Enterprises, 12th Ed, New Delhi: Macmillan. |
| [99] |
Wehncke FC, Marozva G, Makoni PL (2023) Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investments and Official Development Assistance Nexus: Panel ARDL Approach. Economies 11: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010004 doi: 10.3390/economies11010004
|
| [100] | Wolff E, Blomström M (1994) Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico. In: Baumol, W.J., Nelson, R.R., Wolff, E.N., Convergence of Productivity: Cross National Studies and Historical Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 263–284. |
| [101] |
Wu Ch, Burge GS (2018) Competing for Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Local Governments in China. Public Finance Rev 46: 1044–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117698015 doi: 10.1177/1091142117698015
|
| [102] | Zdeněk R, Střeleček F (2012) Evaluation of Development of Employment, Average Wage And Labour Productivity Using Shift-Share Analysis E M Ekon Manag 15: 4–15. |
Figures(5) / Tables(3)
Sylvie Kotíková. 2023: Spillover effects: A challenging public interest to measure, National Accounting Review, 5(4): 373-404. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2023022
DownLoad: