Research article

Soil amendment impact to soil organic matter and physical properties on the three soil types after second corn cultivation

  • Received: 01 November 2019 Accepted: 18 March 2020 Published: 26 March 2020
  • Soil amendment is important for low organic matter soil dominated by sand or clay. Soil amendments using biochar and various types of organic fertilizer have been shown to improve the soil properties. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of soil amendment against the second maize plantation season in different soil types. Biochar and organic fertilizer had been applied to the soil amendment 2 years ago (2017) in a polybag during the second plantation season. Polybags were placed in the field and arranged according to nested designs. The experiment used three types of biochar from rice husk, corn cob, by-products of the tobacco industry called jengkok. Two types of organic fertilizer (compost and chicken manure). Soil samples were predominantly sand (entisol) and clay (inceptisol and entisol lithic subgroups). Soil amendment was given at a dose of 300 g per polybags single type, biochar or organic fertilizer without mixing, and each 150 g per polybags for combination type, biochar mixed with an organic fertilizer in 9 kg of soil. Three types of soil (first factor) and soil amendment (second factor nested in the first factor) consisted of 12 treatments: 1. Control, 2. Corn cob biochar (CB), 3. Rice husk biochar (RB), 4. Jengkok biochar (JB), 5. Compost (Cs), 6. Chicken manure (M), 7. Corn cob biochar + compost (CBCs), 8. Corn cob biochar + manure (CBM), 9. Rice husk biochar + compost (RBCs), 10. Rice husk biochar + manure (RBM), 11. Jengkok biochar + compost (JBCs), 12. Jengkok biochar + manure (JBM). Soil physical properties were observed using intact soil samples (rings 5 cm in diameter and 5.5 cm in height), including saturated hydraulic conductivity, texture, soil water retention capacity, soil bulk density, soil particles, soil porosity, macro, meso, and micropores. It was also observed soil organic matter which was taken in a composite from the surface (0-20 cm). Plants are fertilized with 100 kg P2O5 ha-1, 110 kg K2O ha-1, and 135 kg N ha-1 at each planting season. Data analysis with SPSS and continued with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The results showed each soil amendment had different effectiveness to improve the soil organic matter and its physical properties. Biochar from corn cob mixed with manure is effective to get better corn yields from entisol. While inceptisol soil is suitable with biochar from rice husk mixed with manure. The entisol lithic subgroups are suitable for manure. The soil amendment types affect the soil constituent fraction (sand, dust, clay) composition so that it has an impact on the physical properties of each soil type.

    Citation: Widowati, Sutoyo, Hidayati Karamina, Wahyu Fikrinda. Soil amendment impact to soil organic matter and physical properties on the three soil types after second corn cultivation[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(1): 150-168. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.150

    Related Papers:

  • Soil amendment is important for low organic matter soil dominated by sand or clay. Soil amendments using biochar and various types of organic fertilizer have been shown to improve the soil properties. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of soil amendment against the second maize plantation season in different soil types. Biochar and organic fertilizer had been applied to the soil amendment 2 years ago (2017) in a polybag during the second plantation season. Polybags were placed in the field and arranged according to nested designs. The experiment used three types of biochar from rice husk, corn cob, by-products of the tobacco industry called jengkok. Two types of organic fertilizer (compost and chicken manure). Soil samples were predominantly sand (entisol) and clay (inceptisol and entisol lithic subgroups). Soil amendment was given at a dose of 300 g per polybags single type, biochar or organic fertilizer without mixing, and each 150 g per polybags for combination type, biochar mixed with an organic fertilizer in 9 kg of soil. Three types of soil (first factor) and soil amendment (second factor nested in the first factor) consisted of 12 treatments: 1. Control, 2. Corn cob biochar (CB), 3. Rice husk biochar (RB), 4. Jengkok biochar (JB), 5. Compost (Cs), 6. Chicken manure (M), 7. Corn cob biochar + compost (CBCs), 8. Corn cob biochar + manure (CBM), 9. Rice husk biochar + compost (RBCs), 10. Rice husk biochar + manure (RBM), 11. Jengkok biochar + compost (JBCs), 12. Jengkok biochar + manure (JBM). Soil physical properties were observed using intact soil samples (rings 5 cm in diameter and 5.5 cm in height), including saturated hydraulic conductivity, texture, soil water retention capacity, soil bulk density, soil particles, soil porosity, macro, meso, and micropores. It was also observed soil organic matter which was taken in a composite from the surface (0-20 cm). Plants are fertilized with 100 kg P2O5 ha-1, 110 kg K2O ha-1, and 135 kg N ha-1 at each planting season. Data analysis with SPSS and continued with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The results showed each soil amendment had different effectiveness to improve the soil organic matter and its physical properties. Biochar from corn cob mixed with manure is effective to get better corn yields from entisol. While inceptisol soil is suitable with biochar from rice husk mixed with manure. The entisol lithic subgroups are suitable for manure. The soil amendment types affect the soil constituent fraction (sand, dust, clay) composition so that it has an impact on the physical properties of each soil type.


    加载中


    [1] Reeves DW (1997) The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil Till Res 43: 131-167. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00038-X
    [2] Jimenez JJ, Lorenz K, Lal R (2001) Organic carbon and nitrogen in soil particle size aggregates under dry tropical forests from Guanacaste, Costa Rica implications for within site soil organic carbon stabilization. Catena 86: 178-191.
    [3] Demisie W, Liu Z, Zhang M (2014) Effect of biochar on carbon fractions and Enzyme activity of red soil. Catena 121: 214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.020
    [4] Körschens M, Albert E, Baumecker M, et al. (2014) Humus and climate change- results of 15 long-term experiments. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60: 1485-1517. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2014.892204
    [5] Busscher WJ, Novak JM, Ahmedna M (2011) Physical effects of organic matter amendment of a southeastern US coastal loamy sand. Soil Sci 176: 661-667.
    [6] Haynes RJ, Naidu R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51: 123-137. doi: 10.1023/A:1009738307837
    [7] Muyassir, Sufardi, Saputra I (2012) Perubahan sifat fisika inceptisol akibat perbedaan jenis dan dosis pupuk organik [Changes in the physical properties of inceptisol due to different types and dosages of organic fertilizer]. Lentera 12, 1-8.
    [8] Jien SH, Wang CS (2013) Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110: 225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.06.021
    [9] Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Kavoo A, et al. (2010) Residue quality and N fertilizer do not influence aggregate stabilization of C and N in two tropical soils with contrasting texture. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88: 121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10705-008-9216-9
    [10] Liu XH, Han FP, Zhang XC (2012) Effect of biochar on soil aggregates in the loess plateau: results from incubation experiments. Int J Agric Biol 14: 975-979.
    [11] Odlare M, Arthurson V, Mrt Pell, et al. (2011) Land application of organic waste-effects on the soil ecosystem. Appl Energy 88: 2210-2218. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.043
    [12] Wojcieszak D, Przybyl J, Lewicki A, et al. (2015) Use of neural image analysis methods in the process of determining the dry matter content in the compost. Proc SPIE 9631: 963118. doi: 10.1117/12.2197035
    [13] Li JT, Zhang B (2007) Paddy soil stability and mechanical properties as affected by long-term application of chemical fertilizer and animal manure in subtropical China. Pedosphere 17: 568-579. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60067-8
    [14] Ludwig B, Schulz E, Rethemeyer J, et al. (2007) Predictive modelling of C dynamics in the long-term fertilization experiment at bad Lauchstädt with the rothamsted carbon model. Eur J Soil Sci 58: 1155-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00907.x
    [15] Liu M, Hu F, Chen X, et al. (2009) Organic amendments with reduced chemical fertilizer promote soil microbial development and nutrient availability in a subtropical paddy field: the influence of quantity, type and application time of organic amendments. Appl Soil Ecol 42: 166-175. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.03.006
    [16] Kapkiyai JJ, Karanja NK, Quresh JN, et al. (1999) Soil organic matter and nutrient dynamics in a Kenyan nitisol under long-term fertilizer and organic input management. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1773-1782. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00088-7
    [17] Jokela WE (1992) Nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure effects on corn yield and soil nitrate. SSSA 56: 148-154. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010023x
    [18] Ojeniyi SO, Amusan OA, Adekiya AO (2013) Effect of poultry manure on soil physical properties, nutrient uptake and yield of cocoyam (Xanthoso saggitifolium) in Southwest Nigeria. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 13: 121-125.
    [19] Hueso-González P, Martinez-Murillo JF, Ruiz-Sinoga JD (2014) The impact of organic amendments on forest soil properties under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Land Degrad Dev 25: 604-612. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2296
    [20] Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, et al. (2007) Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 4: 629-634.
    [21] Bashir S, Zhu J, Fu Q, et al. (2018) Cadmium mobility, uptake and the anti-oxidative response of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatic) under rice straw biochar, zeolite, and rock phosphate as amendments. Chemosphere 194: 579-587. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.162
    [22] Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, et al. (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenerg 61: 196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010
    [23] Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Kimber SWL, et al. (2014) An incubation study investigating the mechanisms that impact N2O flux from soil following biochar application. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191: 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.030
    [24] Mukherjee R (2016) Lal, biochar and soil quality. USA: CRC Press.
    [25] Mukherjee R (2013) Lal, biochar impacts on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Agronomy 3: 313-339. doi: 10.3390/agronomy3020313
    [26] Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, et al. (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9: 1137-1143.
    [27] Cornelissen G, Martinsen V, Shitumbanuma V, et al. (2013) Biochar effects on maize yield and soil characteristics in five conservation farming sites in Zambia. Agron J 3: 256-274. doi: 10.3390/agronomy3020256
    [28] Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, et al. (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 28: 386-396. doi: 10.1002/ep.10378
    [29] Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, et al. (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46: 437-444. doi: 10.1071/SR08036
    [30] Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327: 235-246. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x
    [31] Dume T, Mosissa A, Nebiyu (2016) Effect of biochar on soil properties and lead (Pb) availability in a military camp in South West Ethiopia. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 10: 77-85. doi: 10.5897/AJEST2015.2014
    [32] Rogovska N, Laird DA, Rathke SJ, et al. (2014) Biochar impact on Midwestern Mollisols and maize nutrient availability. Geoderma 230-231: 340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.009
    [33] Inal, Gunes A, Sahin O, et al. (2015) Impacts of biochar and processed poultry manure, applied to a calcareous soil, on the growth of bean and maize. Soil Use Manag 31: 106-113. doi: 10.1111/sum.12162
    [34] Zheng JY, Stewart CE, Cotrufo MF (2012) Biochar and nitrogen fertilizer alters soil nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas fluxes from two temperate soils. J Environ Qual 41: 1361-1370. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0019
    [35] Mukherjee R (2014) Lal, the biochar dilemma. Soil Res 52: 217-230. doi: 10.1071/SR13359
    [36] Widowati, Sutoyo, Iskandar T, et al. (2017) Characterization of biochar combination with organic fertilizer: the effects on physical properties of some soil types. Biosci Res 14: 955-965.
    [37] Magdoff F (2001) Concepts components, and strategies of soil health in agroecosystems. J Nematol 3: 169-172.
    [38] Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, et al. (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3: 195-206.
    [39] Bruun EW, Petersen CT, Hansen E, et al. (2014) Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use Manag 30: 109-118. doi: 10.1111/sum.12102
    [40] Dugan E, Verhoef A, Robinson S, et al. (2010) Bio-char from sawdust, maize stover and charcoal: Impact on water holding capacities (WHC) of three soils from Ghana. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Sciences, Brisbane, Australia, 2010 1-6 August, 9-12.
    [41] Martinsen V, Mulder J, Shitumbanuma V, et al. (2014) Farmer-led maize biochar trials: Effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177: 681-695. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201300590
    [42] Nyambo P, Chiduza C, Araya T, et al. (2018) Effects of maize residue biochar amendments on soil properties and soil loss on acidic Hutton soil. Agronomy 8: 256. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8110256
    [43] Czekala W, Jezowska A, Chelkowski D (2019) The use of biochar for the production of organic fertilizers. J Ecol Eng 20: 1-8.
    [44] Scislowska M, Wlodarczyk R, Kobylecki R, et al. (2015) Biochar to improve the quality and productivity of soils. J Ecol Eng 16: 31-35. doi: 10.12911/22998993/2802
    [45] Fryda L, Visser R (2015) Biochar for soil improvement: evaluation of biochar from gasification and slow pyrolysis. Agriculture 5: 1076-1115. doi: 10.3390/agriculture5041076
    [46] Arthur E, Schjonning P, Moldrup P, et al. (2014) Soil structure and microbial activity dynamics in 2-month field-incubated organic amended soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65: 218-230. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12121
    [47] Obia A, Mulder J, Martinsen V, et al. (2016) In situ effects of Biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res 155: 35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.002
    [48] Fungo, Lehmann J, Kalbitz K, et al. (2017) Aggregate size distribution in a biochar-amended tropical Ultisol under Conventional hand-hoe tillage. Soil Tillage Res 165: 190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.08.012
    [49] Ahmed F, Islam S, Iqbal T (2017) Biochar amendment improves soil fertility and productivity of the mulberry plant. Eurasian J Soil Sci 6: 226-237. doi: 10.18393/ejss.291945
    [50] Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, et al. (2018) Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil. Sci Total Environ 625: 1380-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.022
    [51] Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Mukome FND, et al. (2015) Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks, and uncertainties. J Environ Manag 150: 250-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.027
    [52] Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang G, et al. (2018) The effects of rice straw and biochar applications on the microbial community in a soil with a history of continuous tomato planting history. Agronomy 8: 1-13.
    [53] Ohsowski BM, Klironomos JN, Dunfield KE, et al. (2012) Potential of soil amendments for restoring severely disturbed grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 60: 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.006
    [54] Evanylo G, Sherony C, Spargo J, et al. (2008) Soil and water environmental effects of fertilizer-, manure-, and compost-based fertility practices in an organic vegetable cropping system. Agr Ecosyst Environ 127: 50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.02.014
    [55] Hargreaves JC, Adl MS, Warman PR (2008) A Review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture. Agr Ecosyst Environ 123: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.004
    [56] Aggelides SM, Londra PA (2000) Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and clay soil. Bioresour Technol 71: 253-259. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00074-7
    [57] Kadry LT (1973) Classification and distribution of sandy soils in the near East Region and their agricultural potentialities. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/x5869e/x5869e04.htm.
    [58] Pravin R, Chaudhari, Dodha V, et al. (2013) Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. IJSRP 3: 1-7.
    [59] Ma N, Zhang L, Zhang Y, et al. (2016) Biochar improves soil aggregate stability and water availability in a mollisol after three years of field application. Plos One 11: e0154091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154091
    [60] de Melo Carvalho MT, de Holanda Nunes Maia A, Madari BE, et al. (2014) Biochar increases plant-available water in a sandy loam soil under an aerobic rice crop system. Solid Earth 5: 939-952. doi: 10.5194/se-5-939-2014
    [61] Purakayastha TJ, Pathak H, Savita K (2013) Effect of feedstock on characteristics of biochar and its impact on carbon sequestration in soil. Proceedings of National seminar on current environmental challenges and possible solutions, University of Delhi, 74-75.
    [62] Libutti, Mucci M, Francavilla M, et al. (2016) Effect of biochar amendment on nitrate retention in a silty clay loam soil. Ital J Agron 11: 273-276.
    [63] Ben-Noah I, Friedman SP (2018) Review and evaluation of root respiration and natural and agricultural processes of soil aeration. Vadose Zone J 17: 1-47. doi: 10.2136/vzj2018.01.0021
    [64] Hseu Z, Jien S, Chien W, et al. (2014) Impacts of biochar on physical properties and erosion potential of a mudstone slope land soil. Sci World J 2104: 602197.
    [65] Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, et al. (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140: 309-313. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005
    [66] Wang Y, Zhang L, Yang H, et al. (2016) Biochar nutrient availability rather than its water holding capacity governs the growth of both C3 and C4 plants. J Soils Sediments 16: 801-810. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1357-x
    [67] Gebremedhin GH, Haileselassie B, Berhe D, et al. (2015) Effect of biochar on yield and yield components of wheat and post-harvest soil properties in Tigray, Ethiopia. J Fertil Pestic 2015: 2-4.
    [68] Akça MO, Namli A (2015) Effects of poultry litter biochar on soil enzyme activities and tomato, pepper, and lettuce plants growth. Eurasian J Soil Sci 4: 161-168. doi: 10.18393/ejss.2015.3.161-168
    [69] Schnell RW, Vietor DM, Provin TL, et al. (2012) Capacity of biochar application to maintain energy crop productivity: soil chemistry, sorghum growth, and runoff water quality effects. J Environ Qual 41: 1044-1051. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0077
    [70] da Silva ICB, Basílio JJN, Fernandes LA, et al. (2016) Biochar from different residues on soil properties and common bean production. Sci Agric 74: 378-382.
    [71] Speratti AB, Johnson MS, Sousa HM, et al. (2017) Impact of different agricultural waste biochars on maize biomass and soil water content in a Brazilian. Cerrado Arenosol Agronomy 7: 1-19. doi: 10.3390/agronomy7010001
    [72] Bonifas KD, Walters DT, Cassman KG, et al. (2005) Nitrogen supply affects root: shoot ratio in corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 53: 670-675. doi: 10.1614/WS-05-002R.1
    [73] Yeboah E, Ofori P, Quansah GW, et al. (2009) Improving soil productivity through biochar amendments to soils. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 3: 34-41.
    [74] Jeffery S, Abalos D, Prodana M, et al. (2017) Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environ Res Lett 12: 53001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd
    [75] Wael MS, Hamada RB, Mamoudou S, et al. (2019) Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review. S Afr J Bot 127: 333-347. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.015
    [76] Taia AA, Wael MS (2015) Organo mineral fertilizer can mitigate water stress for cucumber production (Cucumis sativus L.). Agric Water Manag 159: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.020
    [77] Wael MS, Taia AA, Saad MH (2014) A novel organo-mineral fertilizer can alleviate the negative effects of salinity stress for eggplant production on reclaimed saline calcareous soil. Acta Hortic 1034: 493-500.
    [78] Wael MS, Taia AA, Saad MH, et al. (2015) Response of Solanum melongena L. Seedlings grown under saline Calcareous soil conditions to a new organo-mineral fertilizer. J Anim Plant Sci 25: 485-493.
    [79] Taia AA, Ibrahim ME, Abd El-Aty MI, et al. (2018) Compost and mulching modulates morphological, physiological responses and water use efficiency in sorghum (Bicolor L. Moench) under low moisture regime. Agric Water Manag 208: 431-439.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(8294) PDF downloads(1156) Cited by(18)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog