Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Review

Air quality inside passenger cars

  • Received: 24 August 2016 Accepted: 05 February 2017 Published: 09 February 2017
  • Vehicle interior is a specific environment of relatively small volume, with variety of materials placed inside, including hard and soft plastics, adhesives, paints, lubricants and many others. As a result, particularly in case of newly produced vehicles, large amounts and numbers of volatile species, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs), may be emitted and have influence vehicle interior air quality (VIAQ). Despite the fact that many of these compounds may not be harmful for human health, some of them may be toxic, and this is the reason for increasing concern of vehicle manufacturers and users recently. The level of contamination varies from one vehicle to another and may be influenced by atmospheric conditions, external pollution, user habits, quality of materials used and others. The main aim of this paper was to present current knowledge status on VIAQ, with indication of main air pollutants and their concentrations. Vehicle interior air quality is discussed on the basis of studies on new and used cars in different conditions and locations. Main sources of VOCs presence inside car cabin are discussed in this paper with additional information regarding materials emissions. Differences in sampling and analytical methodologies were not debated, however, since the results differs largely in the scope of both number and amount of VOCs, a need of testing methods harmonization is indicated. Presented data may be helpful for legislative requirements introduction.

    Citation: Joanna Faber, Krzysztof Brodzik. Air quality inside passenger cars[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(1): 112-133. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.1.112

    Related Papers:

    [1] Masahiro Tokumura, Rurika Hatayama, Kouichi Tatsu, Toshiyuki Naito, Tetsuya Takeda, Mohammad Raknuzzaman, Md. Habibullah-Al-Mamun, Shigeki Masunaga . Car indoor air pollution by volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in Japan. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(3): 362-381. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.362
    [2] Senem Ozgen, Giovanna Ripamonti, Alessandro Malandrini, Martina S. Ragettli, Giovanni Lonati . Particle number and mass exposure concentrations by commuter transport modes in Milan, Italy. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(2): 168-184. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.2.168
    [3] Dimitrios Kotzias . Built environment and indoor air quality: The case of volatile organic compounds. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(2): 135-147. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021010
    [4] Scheitel M, Stanic M, Neuberger M . PM10, PM2.5, PM1, number and surface of particles at the child’s seat when smoking a cigarette in a car. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(4): 582-591. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.4.582
    [5] Pierre Bonnet, Jérémie Achille, Laeticia Malingre, Hervé Duret, Olivier Ramalho, Corinne Mandin . VOCs in cleaning products used in age care and social facilities: Identification of hazardous substances. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(6): 402-417. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.6.402
    [6] Tharwat Mokalled, Stéphane Le Calvé, Nada Badaro-Saliba, Maher Abboud, Rita Zaarour, Wehbeh Farah, Jocelyne Adjizian-Gérard . Atmospheric dispersion modelling of gaseous emissions from Beirutinternational airport activities. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(5): 553-572. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022033
    [7] Lars Carlsen . A posetic based assessment of atmospheric VOCs. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.403
    [8] Pasquale Avino, Maurizio Manigrasso . Ozone formation in relation with combustion processes in highly populated urban areas. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 764-781. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.764
    [9] Suwimon Kanchanasuta, Sirapong Sooktawee, Natthaya Bunplod, Aduldech Patpai, Nirun Piemyai, Ratchatawan Ketwang . Analysis of short-term air quality monitoring data in a coastal area. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(6): 517-531. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021033
    [10] Steffen E. Eikenberry . Hybrids are an effective transitional technology for limiting US passenger fleet carbon emissions. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 117-139. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020007
  • Vehicle interior is a specific environment of relatively small volume, with variety of materials placed inside, including hard and soft plastics, adhesives, paints, lubricants and many others. As a result, particularly in case of newly produced vehicles, large amounts and numbers of volatile species, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs), may be emitted and have influence vehicle interior air quality (VIAQ). Despite the fact that many of these compounds may not be harmful for human health, some of them may be toxic, and this is the reason for increasing concern of vehicle manufacturers and users recently. The level of contamination varies from one vehicle to another and may be influenced by atmospheric conditions, external pollution, user habits, quality of materials used and others. The main aim of this paper was to present current knowledge status on VIAQ, with indication of main air pollutants and their concentrations. Vehicle interior air quality is discussed on the basis of studies on new and used cars in different conditions and locations. Main sources of VOCs presence inside car cabin are discussed in this paper with additional information regarding materials emissions. Differences in sampling and analytical methodologies were not debated, however, since the results differs largely in the scope of both number and amount of VOCs, a need of testing methods harmonization is indicated. Presented data may be helpful for legislative requirements introduction.


    The pollutants present in indoor and outdoor air may undergo different classifications in respect of their nature: organic or inorganic; physical state: gas, liquid, solid or in broader view as disperse systems; particle sizes; biological or non-biological origin, etc. They are present in air as a complex mixture, which, inter alia, consists of [1,2,3]:

    - organic compounds in form of gases or particles,

    - inorganic compounds, such as carbon oxides, nitrogen oxides, radon, ozone,

    - particles, such as dust and fibres,

    - biological particles, such as bacteria, fungi, mould.

    Organic compounds are often divided into four groups on the basis of their boiling points (Table 1) [4,5].

    Table 1.  Classification of VOCs.
    Category Group of compounds Boiling point (°C)
    Start End
    1 Very volatile organic compounds (gases), VVOC < 0 50-100
    2 Volatile organic compounds, VOC 50-100 240-260
    3 Semi-volatile organic compounds, SVOC 240-260 380-400
    4 Organic particle matter, PM > 380 -

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Taking into account that organic compounds in interior environment originate mainly from materials off-gassing, some general remarks can be drawn. Very volatile organic compounds are present at room temperature in the form of gases, because they have low boiling points (< 100 °C), and their off-gassing from materials is relatively fast [2,6]. Semi-volatile organic compounds are compounds with boiling temperatures above 240-260 °C, and among them mainly phthalates, long-chain alkanes, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), fatty acids and their esters, phosphate esters, and others can be found. These compounds can be present in indoor air for several years from their introduction, since they are removed from materials relatively slow [7].

    Organic compounds, which are present in air, may both influence human comfort and have a negative impact on human health. Selected compounds are responsible for [8,9]:

    - drowsiness (e.g. saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, cyclohexane, ethylbenzene, 1-butanol);

    - headache and dizziness (e.g. hexane, heptane, cyclohexane, toluene, naphthalene, trimethylbenzene);

    - eye irritation (e.g. 2-ethylhexanol, benzaldehyde, styrene, propylbenzene);

    - respiratory problems and throat irritation (e.g. styrene, methyl cyclopentane, decalin);

    - fatigue, nausea, skin irritation,

    - may have toxic, carcinogenic or mutagenic effect, and many others.

    Negative health effects were confirmed in case of many organic compounds [10]. Many of those compounds have irritant effect on eyes, throat and respiratory system. Moreover, for selected compounds some other serious effects were found:

    - benzene: has a strong negative effect on central nervous system, can cause genetic diseases, anaemia and other circulatory system diseases, may cause fatigue, somnolence and headache. Moreover, benzene was classified as carcinogenic compound [10,11,12,13,14],

    - toluene: has a negative effect on central nervous system and respiratory system, causes headache, nausea, has impact on awareness, reproduction and hormonal system [10,12,14],

    - styrene: has a negative neurotic effect, can cause genetic illness and may have a carcinogenic effect [14],

    - naphthalene: causes genetic disease, cells destruction and anaemia [11],

    - isomers of trimethylbenzene: each isomer causes somnolence, headache and nausea. The most often found in air is 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene. [12],

    - aldehydes (especially formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein): are known to be toxic, mutagenic or carcinogenic. They are known both respiratory system and eye irritants and their inhalation may increase the likelihood of respiratory illness [10,15].

    Some of organic compounds has both short- and long-term activity, and negative health effects may appear even after few years after exposition, even if compounds' concentrations in air were at low level [4,16]. In vehicle, driver and passengers are exposed to relatively high concentrations of VOCs in car cabin [17]. When present in vehicle interior, organic compounds may also influence driving safety. Besides aforementioned health effects, semi-volatile organic compounds with boiling temperatures above 240-260 °C [5], mainly phthalates, condensate on interior surface of glass windscreen, reducing the transparency and causing light reflections. This phenomenon is called fogging [18,19].

    Many of organic compounds have both irritating and odorous character. People usually can recognize air quality on the basis of surrounding odour [20], and odour-effect usually appears faster than irritation-effects [4]. Human nose is a very sensitive odour detector, capable to detect odorous substances on very low concentration level [21]. On the other hand, odour perception is very subjective and for that reason people can recognize differently the same odour. Moreover, even if specific odour is recognized as a pleasant, after long-term exposure may lead to odour annoyance and discomfort [22].

    On the basis of total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) concentration some sensitivity thresholds values can be defined (Table 2, [16]). To our best knowledge, these threshold values have not been confirmed in scientific researches yet. For that reason it is difficult to establish precise guidelines or legal requirements [23].

    Table 2.  The possible health effects in dependence of the TVOC concentration [16].
    Total VOC (µg/m3) Possible health effects
    < 200 no irritation or discomfort feelings
    200 ÷ 3000 possible irritation or discomfort feelings
    3000 ÷ 25,000 expected discomfort feelings, possible headache
    > 25,000 possible neurotoxic effects

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Indoor air can be polluted by several hundred different organic compounds, including aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene derivatives, carbonyl compounds, halogenated derivatives of hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and others.

    The cabin of a vehicle is regarded to be a specific indoor microenvironment [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The vehicle interior is a closed space in which harmful compounds are concentrated, even if initially they are present at low concentration levels or their emission is relatively low [29,34]. The concentrations of different compounds in the passenger compartment are usually higher (even 2-3 fold) compared with the concentrations of these compounds in other closed environments, where people spend their time (residential, workplace, public buildings, hospitals, and others) [24,29,35,36].

    Volatile organic compounds are the main air pollutants inside the new vehicle. For emission of VOCs into the cabin air in majority plastics are responsible, among them polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyamide, polyester, polyacetal, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, and others. The next sources of VOCs are rubber, natural or artificial leather, textiles, fibres, polyurethane foams, coatings, adhesives and others. Those materials are used to produce components in the cabin interior: dashboard, steering wheel, insulations (plastics), seats and couch, wrapping of the steering wheel (artificial or natural leather), upholstery, soundproofing, roof ceiling, floor mats, seat covers (textiles and fibres) [16,24,25,33,35,37,38,39,40]. The most commonly used material in the automotive industry is polyester, used among others for production of seat covers, floor mats, seat belts and others. Other materials, used to equip vehicle's interior are, for example, polyamide 6 and 6.6, and polypropylene (floor mats), polyethylene and poly(vinyl chloride) (headrests), polyurethane (seats, headrests) [41]. Among all these materials, natural leather is probably the biggest source of emissions of volatile organic compounds [18,37].

    The composition of VOCs, emitted from materials, is quite complicated mixture and difficulties in identification of organic compounds source may occur. Such difficulties are affected by the fact, that there are many indoor sources of VOCs emissions, and one compound can be emitted by different materials [20]. Additionally, some metallic or other inorganic elements can also be the source of organic compounds emissions due to the VOCs accumulation on the element's surface and their subsequent gradual release [42]. On the other hand porous materials can act as sorbents, therefore VOCs emitted from one material can be adsorbed on the surface of the other material [43,44].

    Emission from materials, called "materials off-gassing", can be divided into primary and secondary emission [45,46]. It is assumed that the primary emission of VOCs from materials is the emission which takes place during the first year after material production date. Emitted VOCs are mostly low-molecular organic compounds (i.e. solvent residues, additives and monomers). The secondary emission takes place over one year after material manufacture/introduction to indoor environment and is mostly connected with organic compounds which are products of degradation, hydrolysis or oxidation reaction, and others. The concentration of the compounds resulting from the secondary emission is usually several orders lower than from the primary emission [47].

    The amount of volatile organic compounds emitted from materials used to equip vehicle interior depends on several factors, including air temperature and relative humidity (RH) inside vehicle, the air exchange rate, type of material and the age of vehicle [25,35,37,38,48]. None of indoor environment can be recognized to be static, because temperature and humidity of air changes within time, which affects VOCs emission [2,7,47]. Along with the atmospheric conditions changes the change of organic compounds concentration takes place [1,7,34]. In summer days, when car is exposed to direct sunlight, air temperature in cabin can exceed 65 °C, and the most exposed to sunlight piece of equipment is a dashboard, which temperature may be even higher [41]. A significant dependence of VOCs concentrations inside the cabin on air temperature was confirmed in many studies [12,24,37,40,49]. It should be taken into account, that driver entering vehicle interior, where the air temperature is high, is exposed to maximum temporary VOCs concentration level [12].

    Increased temperature in vehicle interior leads to solvents, various types of additives and other compounds, such as toluene for example, evaporation from materials [38]. Previous studies of vehicle conditioned in an environmental chamber have shown that at a temperature of about 50 °C, the total emission of VOCs in vehicle interior may be even eleven times higher than at ambient temperature (about 20 °C). With the temperature increase inside the cabin, emission of heavier hydrocarbons and their methyl derivatives also increased [49].

    Many scientific researches on emission of harmful compounds from materials are available, however, multiplicity of materials causes that still little is known about the impact of different materials and their interactions on air quality in closed environment of car cabin. It was found that among the compounds, typically emitted into vehicle interior, are acetaldehyde, formaldehyde and xylenes [12], however it is very difficult to indicate clearly one source of those compounds. Ethylbenzene, for example, may be emitted by insulating and soundproofing foams, varnishes and degreasing agents, while emission of undecane may have source in paints and solvents [2].

    Elements made from poly(vinyl chloride), like skin texture imitating materials, are the main source of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol [50,51,52]. It was found that ethylbenzene and styrene are specific compounds emitted from polystyrene, both in ambient and elevated temperature. Benzaldehyde, nonanal, tridecane, decanal, and diethyl phthalate can be emitted at 23 °C from polyethylene, while in higher temperature (70 °C) 2-ethyl-1-hexanol was additionally detected [52]. Additionally, polyethylene may emit inter alia acetic acid, aldehydes, ketones, esters, terpenes, benzene, toluene, naphthalene and wide range of other compounds. Polyamide 6.6 is the source of emission of its degradation products, i.e. cyclopentanone, pentanoic acid and 1-methyl-2-pyridine [51]. The main compound, which is usually emitted from polypropylene, is 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethylheptane, regardless the temperature, while polyurethane foam emits inter alia toluene, phenol, decane, nonanal, benzaldehyde, diethyl phthalate etc. at ambient temperature [52].

    The floor mats are usually the source of styrene, ethylbenzene, hexane and toluene [33,42], while upholstery made from natural leather is the source of alcohols and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. Steering wheel covered with natural leather emits much more carbonyl compounds and furans than steering wheel made from polyurethane [53].

    Mentioned above compounds, which can be emitted from materials, were measured in test conditions, usually after conditioning in glass vessels. It should be pointed out, that test conditions may differ significantly from real conditions [54]. Complexity of chemical composition of air in vehicle interior is also affected by the fact, that multiplicity of different materials are used in small closed space, and each of them is a potential source of air pollution. The situation is also complicated by the fact, that there are many suppliers of similar car components and differences in material's manufacturing process, resulting in different emission rates, may occur. The quantity of organic compounds emitted from materials depends mainly on quality of particular processing steps, and being influenced by, inter alia, material and its residual moisture, mould temperature, residence time, cooling rate, hot spots etc. [55]. Additionally, plastics are often enriched by different additives to achieve desired properties. Among those additives plasticizers, stabilizers or flame retardants can be found [19].

    Despite the fact, that car is a very often used mean of transport, vehicle interior is not well recognized indoor environment, especially in comparison to other indoor environments. It is mainly connected with the fact, that many car brands and models with different interior equipment and many car producers are present on the market.

    The driver and passengers may spend in vehicle interior even 8% of the day, commuting from home to work, traveling during private or business activities [37,53,56,57]. Therefore, persons traveling in automobiles are exposed to, inter alia, the presence of various aromatic hydrocarbons [6,12,24,58,59,60,61,62], aldehydes [24,26,27,28,29,30,63], and phthalates [24], further on carbon monoxide [29,64,65], nitrogen oxides [29,65], particulate matter [29,31,58,66], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [60], and others.

    Chemical composition of air inside vehicle differs qualitatively and quantitatively for new cars in comparison to older vehicles [38]. In new car, in which VOCs emission from materials is the highest [33,37], there are present mainly low molecular weight volatile organic compounds. Concentrations and types of organic compounds present in new car cabin, obtained during different scientific researches, are presented in section 2.1.

    Along with the time of vehicle usage, emission of organic compounds from materials is gradually replaced by emission from so-called moving external sources, that is, for example, the combustion of fuel, fuel leakages and others [57]. The concentrations of VOCs in driven cars depend on many factors, among them the model of the car, it's construction and the related exchange of air, season and weather conditions, time and travel routes, traffic congestion, fuel distribution, and others [35,67,68,69]. The summary of air quality studies in used vehicles is presented in section 2.2.

    The number of researches carried out in terms of human exposure to in-vehicle pollution associated with communication traffic is relatively high, however, there is only few research on air quality in new vehicles connected with materials off-gassing [33,35,53,62], or the number of vehicles under study is limited [25].

    In most of researches on in-vehicle air quality, air samples were collected under static conditions, which means that the engine was shut off and all doors and windows were closed. In most cases vehicles were conditioned at specified temperature before air sampling. Static conditions and conditioning of vehicle under study ensured homogenous distribution of organic compounds in vehicle compartment.

    The concentrations of VOCs in parked vehicle (static conditions) were significantly higher than in vehicle during the test under normal operating conditions (vehicle moving) [17]. This conclusion was confirmed in studies performed by Fedoruk and Kerger [40], on the example of a 4-year-old vehicle, found that concentrations of 10 major compounds were higher in static than in dynamic conditions (vehicle in traffic). Moreover, qualitative air composition was dependent on air sampling conditions.

    The summary of results obtained during studies on air quality in the cabin of new vehicles is presented in Table 3. Vehicles with the age under 3 years were considered as new ones. Only few studies concentrated on vehicles directly after manufacturing are available [70,71,72,73,74,75]. The sum of determined organic compounds differed significantly in different vehicles, depending on test conditions, and ranged from 136 to 14,081 µg/m3. Another factor influencing quantity of organic compounds determined, were differences in air sampling procedure and preparation of vehicle before air sampling.

    Comparison of main compounds frequency in new vehicles is presented in Figure 1. This comparison is based on data presented in Table 3 and presents ten main compounds which were found in new vehicles cabins the most frequently. Among those compounds, isomers of xylene were found as one of main air pollutants in majority of vehicles under study (79%). Another compound frequently detected in new vehicles interiors on elevated concentration level was toluene (68% vehicles), which is consistent with statements in chapter 1.4 (emission from materials). On the other hand, those compounds may also originate from exhaust gases, when vehicle is in road traffic.

    Figure 1.  Frequency of the main VOCs compounds in new vehicles (based on Table 3).
    Table 3.  Investigation on air quality in new vehicles (less than 3 years-old).
    Vehicles Test conditions TVOC (µg m−3) Main compounds (µg m−3) Ref.
    101 Japanese models: Daihatsu, Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru Static, summer, average t = 27 °C, RH = 50%, about 80 cm above the floor 136 ÷ 3968 Heptane: 28.0, hexane: 23.0, 2,4-dimethylheptane: 20.0, decane: 16.0, 2-methylpentane: 15.0, toluene: 33.0, m, p-xylene: 9.4, 1,2,4-TMB(2): 8.3, ethylbenzene: 7.2, 3-ethyltoluene: 5.5, 1-butanol: 23.0, methylcyclopentane: 7.9, 1-nonanal: 5.9, ethyl acetate: 5.7 [25]
    4 models: Toyota Serena, Ford F150 Truck, Ford Mustang, VW Beetle > 1 h of conditioning (1), about 50 cm above the floor, at passenger seat, t = 16 ÷ 44 °C 300 ÷ 7500 1: toluene, undecane, xylenes, 1,2,4-TMB(2); 2: 1-butanol, xylenes, 1,2,4-TMB(2), acetophenone; 3: dodecane, undecane, 2,6-dimethylundecane, 2-ethyltoluene; 4: toluene, xylenes, 1,2,3-TMB(2), 2-ethyltoluene [33]
    1 vehicle: Nissan Serena Static, outdoor parking, summer/autumn, 5 h conditioning (1), about 80 cm above the floor, Osaka, Japan 14,081 m, p-xylene: 3104.0, undecane: 1615.8, decane: 1300.6, o-xylene: 898.9, 1-hexadecene: 767.8, dodecane: 715.7 [35]
    5 vehicles: 3 domestic, Taiwan (< 3 months), 2 from E.U. (> 4 months) 1 h of conditioning (1), at driver seat at shoulder's position, t = 32 °C, RH = 56% N/A(3) Toluene: 2000 ± 3000, m, p-xylene: 2500 ± 1400, o-xylene: 1400 ± 1500, styrene: 1500 ± 2200, 1,2,3-TMB(2): 170 ± 140, undecane: 130 ± 76 [37]
    1 vehicle Static, 16 h of conditioning in environmental chamber, t = 25 ± 0.5 °C; RH = 50±10%, in the middle of front headrests, 20 cm away from the car roof (driver's breathing zone) 4940 Benzene: 48, toluene: 82, o-xylene: 95, m, p-xylene: 346, ethylbenzene: 85, styrene: 155, undecane: 40, decane: 345, nonane: 341, cyclohexanone: 301, tetrachlorethylene: 242, bytyl acetate: 225, α-pinene: 200 [38]
    3 vehicles (<6 months), Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Lumina Static and driving conditions, static—outdoor parking, driving—in traffic, summer, Los Angeles, USA > 5673 and > 1999 1: 2-methyldecane: > 375, 5-methyldecane: > 271, styrene: > 264, 2-methylnonane: > 227 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-heptane: 218, phenol: 194; 2: toluene: > 239, phenol: 124, styrene: 94, e-caprolaktam: 96, 2-ethylhexane acid: 83 [40]
    101 Japanese models: Daihatsu, Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru Static, summer, average t = 32 °C, RH = 45%, about 80 cm above the floor 556 ÷ 11,398 Heptane: 150.0, hexane: 65.0, 2,4-dimethylheptane: 97.0, decane: 58.0, 3-methylnonane: 68.0, dodecane: 46.0, 2-methylpentane: 36.0, tridecane: 29.0, tetradecane: 26.0, toluene: 40.0, o-xylene: 21.0, 1,2,4-TMB(2): 24.0, ethylbenzene: 12.0, 1-butanol: 58.0, methylisobutyl ketone: 34.0 [53]
    802 vehicles, different trims and styles Static, underground parking garage in Beijing, China, t = 18 ± 2 °C N/A(3) Benzene: 270 ± 250, toluene: 1220 ± 1810, Σxylenes: 170 ± 330, formaldehyde: 80 ± 60 [57]
    11 vehicles (< 1 week), the same model produced in Poland Static, outdoor parking area, 1 h of conditioning (1), 50 cm above driver seat, (breathing zone) N/A(3) Benzene: 2.1 ÷ 28.0, toluene: 8.9 ÷ 156.6, xylenes: 37.3 ÷ 198.2 [70]
    9 vehicles (< 1 week), the same model produced in Poland Static, outdoor parking area, 50 cm above driver seat (breathing zone) 1326 ÷ 3067 Aliphatics: 316.6 ÷ 878.4, aromatics: 136.6 ÷ 266.3, cycloalkanes: 46.6 ÷ 232.1, carbonyls: 3.9 ÷ 14.4 [71]
    9 vehicles (< 1 day), the same model, different trim and equipment Outdoor parking area, autumn, t = 21 ÷ 25 °C, RH = 48 ÷ 56%, 15 cm from steering wheel, 50 cm above the driver seat 854 ÷ 6899 Heptane: 6.7 ÷ 670.1, 3-methylhexane: 3.9 ÷ 421.8, 2-methylhexane: 1.8 ÷283.7, undecane: 60.6 ÷ 273.3, methylcyclohexane: 4.0 ÷ 686.5, toluene: 19.4 ÷ 315.1, xylenes: 39.2 ÷ 425.4, 2-ethylhexanol: 13.6 ÷ 58.4 [72]
    10 vehicles (< 3 days), 2 brands produced in Poland Static, t = 17.5 ÷ 24.7 °C, RH = 21.3 ÷ 56.9%, 50 cm above driver seat (breathing zone) Model 1: 3205 (av.), Model 2: 2517 (av.) Model 1: undecane: 195 ± 47.3, decane: 67.8 ± 13.5, dodecane: 62.3 ± 10.6, heptane: 41.4 ± 24.8, xylenes: 50.4, toluene: 103 ± 15.8, ethylbenzene: 38.8 ± 5.12, methylcyclohexane: 39.4 ± 22.7, 2-ethylhexanol: 45.1 ± 11.6, limonene: 38.8 ± 9.51; Model 2: undecane: 147 ± 30.2, heptane: 100 ± 54.4, 3-methylhexane: 90.3 ± 50.0, decane: 49.8 ± 21.3, dodecane: 44.5 ± 9.88, toluene: 54.7 ± 17.9, xylenes: 41.2, methylcyclohexane: 67.1 ± 37.4, 2-ethylhexanol: 41.1 ± 20.0, limonene: 35.4 ± 13.9 [73]
    5 vehicles (< 1 month), 3 brands Static, 16 h of conditioning (1), 50 cm above driver seat (breathing zone) 1259.9 ÷ 8612.4 Heptane: 7.5 ÷ 918.1, undecane: 18.4 ÷ 274.7, toluene: 35.7 ÷ 240.9, ethylbenzene: 43.9 ÷ 519.7, xylenes: 34.8 ÷ 287.4 [74]
    1 vehicle (< 1 month) Environmental chamber, t = 65 °C, RH = 50% 10,929 m, p-xylene: 1570.7, C3-alkilbenzene: 693.5, C4-alkilbenzene: 1041.1, dodecane: 928.9, o-xylene: 879.8, tridecane: 687.1, methylpyrrolidinone: 425.1 [75]
    (1) conditioning means vehicle in static conditions before air sampling (doors and windows closed, ventilation off); (2) TMB: trimethylbenzene; (3) N/A: not available

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Concentration of main air pollutants in new vehicles varied significantly, i.e. toluene range was: 5.5-2000 µg/m3; xylenes: 9.4-2500 µg/m3; undecane: 40.0-1615.8 µg/m3; dodecane: 44.5-928.9 µg/m3; and decane: 16.0-1300.6 µg/m3. These differences originated probably from differences in vehicles' age, and differences in materials used.

    Chien [37] found that intra-model variability (expressed as a coefficient of variation between different examples of the same model) for 12 organic compounds was on average 47%, and between different brands (inter-brand variability) it was 95%. This means that air composition, determined in one example of vehicle model can be transferred with approximation of 47% to another vehicle example of the same model. The differences in the concentrations of volatile organic compounds in different vehicle brands are so significant, that air composition in one vehicle brand cannot be directly transferred to another brand. Chien performed researches on 12 most common organic compounds, in five different vehicles. On this basis it was found that the concentrations of determined compounds varied significantly, depending on the vehicle model. On the other hand, Faber et al. in their studies investigated changes of key compounds (benzene, toluene and xylenes, BTX) in eleven new vehicles of the same model. They found, that concentration of BTX compounds was as follows: benzene 2.1 ÷ 28.0 µg/m3, toluene 8.9 ÷ 156.6 µg/m3, xylenes: 37.3 ÷ 198.2 µg/m3, depending significantly on the vehicle example [70]. In other study, Faber et al. found that compounds like benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, naphthalene, methylcyclohexane, 3-methylhexane, octane, decane, undecane, dodecane, tridecane, cyclohexanone etc. were found in all nine vehicles tested [71]. Fedoruk and Kerger found that toluene, styrene and alkanes were present in all three vehicles tested [40].

    Buters et al. [75] conducted a study on two vehicles of the same type with the same interior equipment. One car was new (about one month after production date) and one was used (about 3 years-old). It was found that the concentration of organic compounds in a new car was ten times higher than in used car. On the basis of above mentioned studies, it can be stated that not only compounds concentrations change with the vehicle usage, but also changes the quantity of VOCs. You et al. [38] identified 82 compounds in one new vehicle, whereas in the one-year-old vehicle they found 61 compounds, and only 36 compounds in five-year-old.

    Presented results differ in terms of number of vehicles tested and number of VOC analysed. For example, Zhang et al. [57] conducted a study on 802 different new cars, but they analysed only four organic compounds. They found that toluene was the predominant air pollutant in all vehicles cabins. In another study, Yoshida and Matsunaga [35], determined 161 organic compounds, however, the subject of their research was only one new private car. The widest range of research, both in terms of the number of vehicles tested and the number of identified organic compounds, was conducted by Yoshida et al. [25,53]. During their study air samples were collected from 101 Japanese cars. In air samples a total number of 275 organic compounds were identified, and TVOC depended significantly on the model and age of vehicle tested, varying from 136 to 11,398 µg/m3. From all determined compounds, 242 were present in all vehicles tested.

    Some studies were focused also on the influence of materials in vehicle interior on air quality, VOCs concentrations and their types changes. Brodzik et al. [72] investigated the influence of interior materials change (colour of steering wheel, changes in upholstery, introducing of sunroof or convertible roof) on concentration of organic compounds. They found that intra-model variability in identically equipped cars was below 14%. Introducing sunroof into vehicle with the same interior equipment caused increase of TVOC by 1.6 times. On the other hand changes in upholstery materials in vehicles with sunroof caused increase of TVOC 2 times. Effect of trim materials was also described by Xu et al. [17], who found that in cabin with leather trim concentrations of benzene, toluene, xylenes, styrene, acrolein with acetone were higher than in cabin with fabric trim, while formaldehyde concentration was on similar level, regardless trim material.

    To sum up, in most of the vehicles under study the main air pollutants were aliphatic hydrocarbons, accounting from 42 to 59% of TVOC [25,35,38,53], then aromatic hydrocarbons, accounting from 16 to 42% of TVOC [25,35,53]. Cycloalkanes, chlorinated hydrocarbons, terpenes, esters, and other compounds, accounted for less than 10% of the total emission of VOCs [35] or 18% of TVOC [53]. In other study, unidentified compounds accounted for 41.8 ÷ 66.3% of VOCs emission [33]. The most found compounds at high concentration level in new vehicles interiors were: toluene [25,33,37,38,40,53,57,70,71,72,73,74], xylenes [25,33,37,38,53,57,70,71,72,73,74,75], ethylbenzene [25,38,53,71,74], isomers of trimethylbenzene [25,33,37,53,71], heptane [25,40,53,71,72,73,74], undecane [33,37,38,71,72,73,74], styrene [37,38,40] and 1-butanol [25,33,53].

    Many of researches on air quality in used vehicles were described so far, and mainly focused on the exposure of people to volatile organic compounds present in the interiors of these vehicles. Mentioned studies have been conducted mainly in urban areas with heavy traffic in Europe, Asia, and in the USA. Comparison of the research results on air quality inside the cabin of used vehicles is presented in Table 4.

    Most of the investigations were focused on compounds to be known as vehicle exhaust gases emissions markers and indicators of car cabin pollution: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene and p-xylene (BTEX) [26,27,28,30,36,63,67,69,70,76,77,78]. These compounds are emitted during fuel combustion in car engines or refuelling, and can penetrate into the interior of the cabin in natural circulation of air or suction through the ventilation system [28,29,36,59,64,69,78,79]. Comparison of average BTEX concentrations on the basis of 20 used vehicles is presented in Figure 2, however average value or median does not reflect the concentration range of BTEX compounds in vehicles in different traffic conditions. The concentrations ranges were, respectively: benzene 0.75-203.7 µg/m3; toluene 32.2-770 µg/m3; o-xylene 6.6-76 µg/m3; m, p-xylene 7.4-127.2 µg/m3; ethylbenzene 0.6-213 µg/m3.

    Figure 2.  Average BTEX compounds concentrations in used vehicles.

    It can be noticed that the highest reported concentrations of toluene and xylenes are lower than in some cases of new vehicles. These compounds concentrations undergo the same changes as benzene, which concentration is much higher than in new cars. This suggests that toluene and xylenes are example of compounds which undergo two opposite trends: lowering in-vehicle concentration due to decrease of materials emission in time, and increase of in-vehicle concentration due to outdoor pollution, i.e. exhaust gases.

    Car exhaust gases are major source of human exposure to particulate matter and soot [31,66], aldehydes, among which the most toxic are formaldehyde and acetaldehyde [80], naphthalene, which is a component of gasoline and diesel fuel [59]. In non-moving car (in traffic jam) the car's exhaust gases can penetrate to cabin and contribute to pollution inside car [76]. Moreover, vehicle's exhaust gases are the main source of aldehydes in urban areas, and it was found that aldehydes may be present in car cabin at elevated concentrations. Therefore, car's users are exposed to these toxic compounds, which can originate both from exhaust gases and from materials off-gassing [15]. It is also believed that human exposure to BTEX compounds is closely associated with the use of a car [36,65]. It is estimated that high concentration of toxic pollutants such as benzene and other aromatic compounds in vehicle interior, may comprise from 10 to 60% of non-smoking human exposure to these compounds [58].

    Table 4.  Investigation of air quality in used vehicles.
    Vehicles Test conditions Place of testing Compounds (µg m−3) Ref.
    7 private or rental vehicles (~ 5 years of usage) Real busy traffic Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Shenzhen, China TVOC: 612.25 ± 188.92, benzene: 16.73 ± 7.45, toluene: 66.02 ± 62.00, ethylbenzene: 14.20 ± 12.14, styrene: 6.78 ± 5.55, xylenes: 28.09 ± 28.72, formaldehyde: 16.43 ± 4.95, acetaldehyde: 12.47± 11.44, acrolein + acetone: 20.65 ± 11.44 [17]
    20 taxis Real traffic, summer, winter, breathing zone, smoking allowed Taegu, Korea Benzene: 33.3 ± 14.2, toluene: 120.0 ± 59.6, ethylbenzene: 10.7 ± 4.4, o-xylene: 9.0 ± 4.7, m, p-xylene: 21.6 ± 9.9 [26]
    33 private vehicles (29 models, 15 producers) Real traffic, winter/spring (t = 16 ÷ 45 °C), in the breathing zone, in the middle of cabin Heraklion, Greece ΣPBDE(1): 0.00040 ÷ 0.00057 [24]
    2 vehicles Real traffic, smoking not allowed Detroit, USA Toluene: 8.4 ÷ 26.3, hexane: 7.9 ÷ 21.2, m, p-xylene: 4.7 ÷ 10.1, benzene: 3.9 ÷ 9.3, 1,2,4-TMB(2): 2.0 ÷ 4.8 [27]
    2 used vehicles: Hyundai Excel Real traffic, winter, in the breathing zone Taegu, Korea Benzene: 30.7 ± 17.0, toluene: 100.8 ± 78.1, ethylbenzene: 9.2 ± 6.6, o-xylene: 22.8 ± 17.1, m, p-xylene: 29.1 ± 17.6 [28]
    2 vehicles: Hyundai Sonata Ⅱ, Hyundai Elantra Driving conditions, simulated, autumn/winter, passenger seat and back seat Taegu, Korea Benzene: 49.1 ± 35.8, toluene: 115.0 ± 56.4, ethylbenzene: 11.7 ± 8.8, o-xylene: 13.2 ± 10.0, m-xylene: 20.5 ± 13.2, p-xylene: 10.1 ± 9.7 [30]
    50 trooper cars Real traffic, summer/autumn, at backside of front passenger seat, no smoking North Carolina, USA Aldehydes: 38.1 ± 17.1, benzene: 4.0 ± 3.2 ppb, toluene: 10.4 ± 20.2 ppb, ethylbenzene: 0.9 ± 0.4 ppb, xylenes: 4.5 ± 2.0 ppb, p-ethyltoluene: 0.4 ± 0.2 ppb, ΣTMB(2): 2.0 ± 0.8 ppb [37]
    11 private vehicles, urban area Real traffic Hannover, Germany Benzene: 26.6 ± 40.3, toluene: 90.2 ± 141.1, ethylbenzene: 22.5 ± 35.2, o-xylene: 18.5 ± 25.9, m, p-xylene: 54.4 ± 80.3 [36]
    33 private vehicles, industrial area Real traffic Hannover, Germany Benzene: 42.0 ± 101.8, toluene: 129.4 ± 280.7, ethylbenzene: 16.4 ± 31.6, o-xylene: 13.6 ± 24.4, m, p-xylene: 48.0 ± 92.6 [36]
    2 used vehicles (1-year, 5-years old) Static, environmental chamber, conditioning for 16 h, t = 25 °C, RH = 50 ± 10% China Benzene: 2.4 ÷ 10.0, toluene: 32.2 ÷ 50.0, o-xylene: 3.3 ÷ 9.9, m, p-xylene: 10.2 ÷ 20.0, ethylbenzene: 3.5 ÷ 9.9, styrene: 2.3 ÷ 9.8, decane: 8.1 ÷ 89.3, undecane: 9.3 ÷ 130.0, dodecane: 6.4 ÷ 163.4 [38]
    2 vehicles (4-years old) Real traffic, summer Los Angeles, USA Benzene: 1.9, toluene: 71.4 ± 23.7, ethylbenzene: 4.2 ± 2.3, o-xylene: 6.2 ± 2.7, m, p-xylene: 11.2 ± 5.2, hexane: 5.2 ± 4.3 [40]
    20 vehicles (> 3 years old) Static, underground parking garage, t = 18 ± 2 °C Beijing, China Benzene: 250, toluene: 770, Σxylenes: 110 [57]
    10 vehicles: 5 unleaded gasoline, 5 diesel Real traffic, winter/spring, at passenger seat, no smoking Taegu, Korea Gasoline: benzene: 6.52 ÷ 33.6, naphthalene: 1.13 ÷ 5.36 [59]
    1 vehicle: VW Golf Simulated, summer, winter, in the breathing zone Spandau-Neukölln, Germany ΣPAH(3) in summer: 10.2 ± 5.6, ΣPAH(3) in winter: 28.7 ± 14.5 [60]
    8 private vehicles: Hyundai Grandure ⅡI, gasoline Driving conditions, static—parking area, at the back seat Seoul, Korea Toluene: 34.8 ± 16.8, styrene: 1.15 ± 0.82, formaldehyde: 49.0 ± 13.9, acetaldehyde: 45.6 ± 8.20, propionaldehyde: 13.5 ± 8.51, butyraldehyde: 24.13 ± 13.5, benzene: 1.14 ± 0.69 [61]
    23 private vehicles Real traffic, summer, winter, smoking allowed Ispra, Italy Summer: dodecane: 10.4 ÷ 192.5, benzene: 2.0 ÷ 149.1, toluene: 3.3 ÷ 558.4, xylenes: 2.9 ÷ 281.7, ethylbenzene: 0.6 ÷ 60.2, 1,2,4-TMB(2): 0.7 ÷ 54.6, acetaldehyde: 10.8 ÷ 65.1, acetone: 9.3 ÷ 56.0; winter: dodecane: 4.3 ÷ 23.3, benzene: 4.3 ÷ 90.7, toluene: 9.3 ÷ 309.5, xylenes: 8.3 ÷ 202.1, ethylbenzene: 1.5 ÷ 39.4, 1,2,4-TMB(2): 1.6 ÷ 40.1, acetaldehyde: 5.2 ÷ 38.9, acetone: 14.4 ÷ 39.7 [62]
    9 private vehicles Real traffic, winter Boston, USA Benzene: 17.0 ± 10.0, toluene: 33.1 ± 20.4, ethylbenzene: 5.8 ± 3.9, o-xylene: 7.3 ± 4.8, m, p-xylene: 20.9 ± 13.8, formaldehyde: 5.1 ± 3.9 [63]
    2 rental cars: Mercury Sable, Mercuty Marquis, gasoline Simulated, at driver's breathing zone Raleigh, USA Benzene: 11.6 ± 6.9, toluene: 46.5 ± 27.3, o-xylene: 11.4 ± 6.2, m, p-xylene: 30.5 ± 17.2, 1,2,4- TMB(2): 15.6 ± 8.7, butane: 54.3 ± 84.7, isopentane: 68.7 ± 68.8, pentane: 30.8 ± 77.1, hexane: 13.6 ± 18.5 [65]
    4 vehicles: Hyundai Elantra, Daewoo Prince, Kia Pride, gasoline Simulated conditions, summer, winter, 55 cm above passenger seat, breathing zone Taegu, Korea Benzene: 60.2 ± 50.9, toluene: 181.0 ± 158.0, ethylbenzene: 24.8 ± 18.9, o-xylene: 53.0 ± 41.9, m, p-xylene: 71.8 ± 75.7 [67]
    5 private vehicles: Ford Fiesta, Vauxhall, Cavalier, Nissan Micra, BMW-5 Simulated, in the breathing zone, normal ventilation Birmingham, UK Benzene: 7.7 ppb, toluene: 31.0 ppb, o-xylene: 2.5 ppb, m, p-xylene: 2.7 ppb [69]
    2 vehicles produced in Poland Static, outdoor parking area, 50 cm above driver seat (breathing zone) Bielsko-Biała, Poland Benzene: 1.4 to 38.5, toluene: 13.2 to 74.5, xylenes: 3.0 to 58.9 [70]
    1 vehicle (3 years) Environmental chamber, t = 65 °C, RH = 50% - Acetone: 250.0, mehtylpyrrolidinone: 93.0, methylcyclohexane: 91.7, acetaldehyde: 73.8, ethylhexanol: 56.2, toluene: 47.1, m, p-xylene: 46.3, o-xylene: 24.4, ethylbenzene: 11.7 [75]
    1 vehicle, gasoline fuelled, Renault Express Simulated, from autumn to summer, in the breathing zone Paris, France Benzene: 42 ± 16, toluene: 218 ± 61, ethylbenzene: 33 ± 12, o-xylene: 36 ± 12, m, p-xylene: 110 ± 43, 1,2,4-TMB (2): 47 ± 13 [76]
    1 vehicle, Ford Fiesta Real traffic, autumn, 6 days per week Huddersfield, UK Benzene: 108.3 ± 106.2 [82]
    12 private vehicles Real traffic, smoking allowed Birmingham, UK Benzene: 203.7 ± 152.3, toluene: 494.0 ± 283.6, ethylbenzene: 51.9 ± 30.8, o-xylene: 54.2 ± 33.6, m-xylene: 127.2 ± 76.8, p-xylene: 52.5 ± 31.5, 1,3,5-TMB(2): 9.4 ± 5.9, styrene: 4.3 ± 3.1, 1,2,4- TMB(2): 33.9 ±21.5, naphthalene: 5.0 ± 3.3 [81]
    11 vehicles, different fuels: petrol, diesel, LPG Simulated, winter, t = 29, 1 °C, RH = 55%, at driver breathing zone Kolkata, India Gasoline engines: benzene: 112.4 ± 65.6, toluene: 207.3 ± 86.4, ethylbenzene: 69.4 ± 30.8, o-xylene: 54.6 ± 33.7, m, p-xylene: 93.6 ± 28.3; diesel engines: benzene: 87.0 ± 59.5, toluene: 178.9 ± 78.5, ethylbenzene: 53.6 ± 20.6, o-xylene: 50.9 ± 15.1, m, p-xylene: 112.7 ± 36.3 [78]
    2 private vehicles: Chevrolet Celebrity, Plymouth Horizon Real traffic, 50 cm above passenger seat New Jersey/ New York, USA Benzene: 16.2 ÷ 26.4, toluene: 71 ÷ 101, o-xylene: 12.5 ÷ 20.7, m, p-xylene: 31.4 ÷ 52.9, ethylbenzene: 8.8 ÷ 14.3, 1,2,4- TMB(2): 13.9 ÷23.2, hexane: 9.8 ÷ 9.9, isooctane: 21.9 ÷ 29.2, 3-methylpentane: 15.5 ÷ 26.0 [79]
    40 private vehicles, gasoline, Daewoo Real traffic, summer, winter, in the front of passenger seat, in the breathing zone, no smoking Taegu, Korea Formaldehyde: 20.0 ± 7.3, acetaldehyde: 8.9 ± 5.7 [80]
    24 vehicles, Japanese models: Nissan, Honda, Suzuki, Toyota, Subaru, Mitsubishi, Daihatsu, Mazda, Isuzu; different age Outdoor parking, not conditioned, late autumn, t = 13.7 ÷ 25.8 °C, near driver headrest in the breathing zone, smoking allowed Yokohama, Kawagoe, Japan TVOC: 8 ÷ 867, 3-methylpentane: 0 ÷ 342, 2-methylpropane: 0 ÷ 310, p-dichlorobenzene: 0 ÷ 209, 1,2,3-TMB(2): 0 ÷ 163, cyclohexane: 0 ÷ 85.7, 1-methyl-4-ethylbenzene: 0 ÷ 83.9, toluene: 4.23 ÷ 78.3, undecanal: 0 ÷ 78.0, dichloromethane: 0 ÷ 69.4 [83]
    Multiple vehicles, gasoline Real traffic, at driver's collar Taichung, Taiwan TVOC: 962 ÷ 1071, benzene: 135, toluene: 371, ethylbenzene: 213, m, p-xylene: 90, o-xylene: 76 [84]
    2 vehicles Simulated driving conditions, in driver breathing zone Dublin, Ireland Benzene: 0.84 ÷ 8.94, 1,3-butadiene: 0.37 ÷ 2.96 [85]
    3 vehicles: compact, midsize sedan, large sedan; gasoline Static, outdoor parking, t = 35.8 °C, RH = 41.9%, at 60 cm above centre of back seat Seoul, Korea Benzene: 0.75 ÷ 6.03, toluene: 4.77 ÷ 18.7, xylenes: 2.02 ÷ 14.4, styrene: 0.05 ÷ 0.57, formaldehyde: 7.03 ÷ 38.2, acetaldehyde: 2.11 ÷ 14.0, acetone: 3.54 ÷ 15.9, methyl ethyl ketone: 0.29 ÷ 2.09, methyl isobutyl ketone: 0.06 ÷ 4.48 [86]
    (1) PBDE: polybrominated diphenyl ethers; (2) TMB: trimethylbenzene; (3) PAH: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    When comparing different indoor microenvironments, occupied by people: homes, offices, laboratories, cinemas, libraries, pubs, restaurants, department stores, perfume shops, coach and train stations, trains, buses and cars, it was found that the highest concentration of benzene and 1,3-butadiene was in cars [81]. Moreover, VOCs concentrations were higher in vehicle cabin than outside vehicle (roadside) at the same time [31,36]. In addition, the highest concentration of benzene was observed in the case of a car in comparison to the other means of road transport (train, bus, bicycle) [82].

    Presented results of particular investigations differ in terms of compounds concentrations. Those differences are the result of differences in the vehicle model, it's height, cabin volume, smoking, driving and meteorological parameters [26,67].

    Seasonal differences in VOCs concentrations are clearly visible. In winter, when combustion efficiency of gasoline is lower, the concentrations of aromatic compounds in the roadway air are higher [26,76]. This resulted in higher concentrations of aromatic VOCs in vehicle cabin, despite the fuel used (both in cars with gasoline and diesel or LPG engines). On this basis, it was stated that the presence of organic compounds in vehicle interior risen from car exhaust gases of other road users [26]. This theory was confirmed by Dor et al. [76], who proved that the exhaust gases enter vehicle interior in heavy traffic. In addition, higher concentrations of determined compounds in winter months can be explained by lower air circulation inside the car (windows closed). Research of Lawryk and Weisel [79] have shown that under conditions of limited air exchange in the vehicle cabin, toluene and xylenes are present at a significantly higher concentration levels, than under normal ventilation. In the case of well-maintained cars, most of the VOCs present in the passenger compartment comes from the exhaust gases of other road users [78]. Such situation may occur especially during slow driving in heavy traffic, because VOCs concentrations in car's interior is highly dependent upon traffic density and driving speed [64,84]. Moreover, it was proved that the closer distance to the exhaust gases of former vehicle in heavy traffic, the higher concentration of 1,3-butadiene inside vehicle [85].

    On the other hand, Geiss et al. [62] found that concentration of 18 different organic compounds were 36% higher in summer than in winter, which is consistent with the results of Jo and Choi [28]. The exceptions were benzene and α-pinene, whichconcentrations were independent of the season. Jo and Park [67] found, that much higher concentrations of analysed compounds were determined in summer months than in winter, and in the case of benzene and toluene differences of concentrations between seasons were statistically significant.

    Faber et al. in their studies investigated changes of key compounds (benzene, toluene and xylenes, BTX) during vehicles usage. They found, that concentrations of BTX compounds increased with mileage, from 1.4 to 38.5 µg/m3 for benzene; from 13.2 to 74.5 µg/m3 for toluene, reaching the maximum value of 93.1 µg/m3 during the test; and from 3.0 to 58.9 µg/m3 for xylenes [70]. Aromatic compounds may enter the interior of vehicle during driving, refuelling due to fuel evaporation or to local fuel leakages. Jo and Choi concluded that emissions and fuel evaporation are the main sources of human exposure to aromatic compounds in the passenger vehicle [28], and toluene was the most abundant compound in vehicle interior [26,30]. Exhaust gases from fuel combustion contain aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, oxygen containing hydrocarbons, cycloalkanes, terpenes, and halogenated compounds, and among them BTEX compounds are present at relatively high level, accounting for 37-50% of total VOCs contents [87]. Moreover, aldehydes penetration from roadside into the vehicle interior exceeds any potential amount which can be emitted by materials [80].

    Another parameter influencing VOCs concentration in vehicles under traffic conditions, is the type of fuel used. According to research, in gasoline powered vehicle, car user is exposed to increased concentrations of 5 to 24 different VOCs in comparison to cars powered by other fuels or other means of transport [26,28,59,67,68,69]. Concentrations of benzene and toluene were 3 times higher in cars fuelled with gasoline than in cars with diesel engines [36]. Som et al. [78] in their work investigated cars powered by different types of fuel (diesel, LPG, gasoline with 3 and 5% benzene content). Based on the survey, it was found that exposure to organic compounds from the group of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and m, p-xylene) depends on the type of fuel used. Drivers exposure to benzene and naphthalene was studied by Jo and Lee [59], who found, that these compounds concentrations are much higher in cars fuelled with gasoline than in cars fuelled with diesel.

    The influence of the external environment (urban and industrial area) on BTEX concentrations in the passenger compartment was studied by Ilgen et al. [36]. It was found that external air pollution (industrial area) significantly affected in-vehicle air quality. Similar conclusions arisen from research of Chan et al. [65], who found that the concentrations of 24 different VOCs (16 aliphatic compounds, 1 olefin and 7 aromatic compounds) clearly depends on the driving route. The highest concentrations were observed on road transport for isopentane, butane and pentane, and among aromatic hydrocarbons, for toluene, m, p-xylene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene. Chan et al. [63] also found, that among target VOCs the highest concentration was for toluene and the lowest for ethylbenzene in each commuting mode.

    There is no worldwide accepted regulation or guidelines regarding interior vehicle air quality so far. A level of TVOC concentration at 1÷3 mg/m3 was proposed by Schupp et al. few years ago [12]. Local limitations differ both in measured organic compounds number and their concentrations. Voluntary guidelines of Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA, [88]) cover 9 compounds, while Chinese [89] and Korean [90] limitations 7 and 8, respectively. In each case formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, ethylbenzene, styrene, toluene and xylenes are in the scope of interest and for these compounds maximum allowed values were established. Although type of volatile organic compounds in the area of interest may be the same, the differences appear in the test method details. Limitations of considered VOCs concentrations are presented in Table 5.

    Table 5.  Limitations of VOCs concentrations in vehicle (µg m−3).
    Compound Japan (2006) [88] China (2011) [89] Korea (2013) [90]
    Benzene - 110 30
    Toluene 260 1100 1000
    Xylene 870 1500 870
    Ethylbenzene 3800 1500 1000
    Styrene 220 260 220
    Tetradecane 330 - -
    Formaldehyde 100 100 210
    Acetaldehyde 48 50 -
    Acrolein - 50 50
    p-dichlorobenzene 240 - -
    di-n-butyl phthalate 220 - -

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Several standards, besides aforementioned, regarding whole vehicle testing are being used worldwide, and many of car manufacturers do control vehicle interior air quality on the basis of their own standards. The differences between methodologies prevent simple comparison of the results obtained, as some major factors influencing compounds concentrations are different in each case. These factors are such as vehicle storage time, test temperature, conditioning/soaking and preconditioning time.

    The big step to harmonization of the test procedures was possible by ISO 12219 standard introduction, which part no. 1 describes the normalized tests on interior air quality based on simulation of three vehicle states [91]. Ambient mode at 23 °C simulates conditions of car parked in the garage overnight, in parking mode vehicle is heated by heating lamps and these conditions correspond to parking mode of the vehicle in the sunlight. Both of these modes requires no air exchange while third simulates driving condition and takes place immediately after the second. In this case air conditioning system is on. There is a chance that further legal regulations regarding vehicle air quality will be based on ISO 12219-1 test methodology. Acceptation of such methodology will certainly be gladly welcome by car manufacturers worldwide as they will not be forced to fulfil requirements regarding the same matter but differently measured.

    Implementation of worldwide accepted testing procedure would also allow for independent testing and independent quality control. However, it is expected that in foreseeable future there will not be worldwide accepted interior emission limit values due to different levels of country development and costs associated with interior emission control technology [92]. ISO 12219 family of standards up to date covers also testing of VOC emission from materials under different conditions and with the use of different testing chambers: from micro scale (ca. 44 cm3) to small (up to 4 m3), allowing independent comparison of material test results. As none of aforementioned ISO standards introduces concentrations limits for any of volatile compounds, the process of vehicle or material approval on markets with different legal regulations may be significantly simplified.

    Elevated concentrations of various VOCs in vehicle cabin, compared with ambient air or other indoor environments, and their impact on human health has been paid a risen attention of the researches. Multiplicity of synthetic materials placed in vehicle interior emit even hundreds of volatile organic compounds. For that reason, concentrations of different organic compounds are probably the highest in new vehicles and decrease with vehicle age increase, along with decreased with time emission of VOCs from materials. Concentrations of main air pollutants in new vehicles varied significantly, depending mainly on vehicle age and type and materials used in vehicle interior. For example, toluene concentration varied from 5.5 to 2000 µg/m3; xylenes were in the range of 9.4-2500 µg/m3; undecane from 40.0 to 1615.8 µg/m3, and decane from 16.0 to 1300.6 µg/m3. Similarly, the sum of determined organic compounds ranged from 136 to 14,081 µg/m3, depending on vehicle type and test conditions.

    On the other hand air in driven car may be polluted by compounds originating from fuel combustion. For that reason vehicle user is exposed to different harmful species. While in used vehicle organic compounds from exterior sources may be eliminated by application of proper air filters and air quality can be improved, in new vehicle air quality is strictly connected with quality of materials used in car cabin.

    Legislative regulations concerning Vehicle Interior Air Quality are likely to be introduced by more and more countries, however in foreseeable future no worldwide limits of VOCs concentrations are expected. Introducing harmonized test methodologies would allow gathering more accurate data on VOCs presence in vehicles cabin, as air quality is influenced by multiple factors. Such approach would also presumably allow for better recognition of health risks connected with volatile organic compounds presence. Regarding the possibility of car driver and passengers exposure to the presence of even several hundreds of organic compounds it can be also assumed that in the future regulations will cover more than few compounds as it is nowadays.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper

    [1] Glader A (2012) Chemical emissions from building structures – Emission sources and their impact on indoor air. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
    [2] Levin H (2003) Indoor air pollutants. Part 1: general description of pollutants, levels and standards. Ventilation Information Paper 2.
    [3] Minister of Supply and Services, Canada (1995) Exposure guidelines for residential indoor air quality. A Report of the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health.
    [4] Report No 19, EUR 17675 EN (1997) Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) in indoor air quality investigations. European Collaborative Action 'Indoor Air Quality & its Impact on Man', Luxembourg.
    [5] ISO 16000-6:2011: Determination of volatile organic compounds in indoor and test chamber air by active sampling on Tenax TA® sorbent, thermal desorption and gas chromatography using MS or MS-FID.
    [6] Jones AP (1999) Indoor air quality and health. Atmos Environ 33: 4535-4564. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00272-1
    [7] Weschler ChJ, Nazaroff WW (2008) Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmos Environ 42: 9018-9040. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.052
    [8] Heinzow B, Sagunski H (2009) Evaluation of indoor air contamination by means of reference and guide values: the German approach, In: Salthammer T, Uhde E, Organic indoor air pollutants 2 ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 189-211.
    [9] Sărbu I, Sebarchievici C (2011) Olfactory comfort assurance in buildings, In: Mazzeo N (ed.), Chemistry, emission control, radioactive pollution and indoor air quality, InTech, 407-428.
    [10] Dinh TV, Choi IY, Son YS, et al. (2016) Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in surface coating materials: their compositions and potential as an alternative fuel. J Environ Manage 168: 157-164.
    [11] Selected pollutants (2010) WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality, WHO.
    [12] Schupp T, Bolt HM, Jaeckh R, et al. (2006) Benzene and its methyl-derivatives: Derivation of maximum exposure levels in automobiles. Toxicol Lett 160: 93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.06.012
    [13] Wadge A, Salisbury J (1997) Benzene. National Environmental Health Monographs. Air Series No. 2, Department of Human Services, Australia, Glenelg Press.
    [14] World Health Organization (1999) Indoor air quality: organic pollutants. EURO Reports and Studies 111, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [15] Mapou AEM, Shendell DG, Therkorn JH (2006) Aldehydes in passenger vehicles: An analysis of data from the RIOPA study 1999-2001. Atmos Environ 79: 751-759.
    [16] Air Quality Sciences, Inc. (2006) Indoor air quality hazards of new cars. Marietta, USA.
    [17] Xu B, Wu Y, Gong Y, et al. (2016) Investigation of volatile organic compounds exposure inside vehicle cabins in China. Atmos Pollut Res 7: 215-220.
    [18] Kalman EL, Löfvendahl A, Winquist F, et al. (2000) Classification of complex gas mixtures from automotive leather using an electronic nose. Anal Chim Acta 403: 31-38. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00604-2
    [19] Wensing M, Uhde E, Salthammer T (2005) Plastic additives in the indoor environment – flame retardants and plasticizers. Sci Total Environ 339: 19-40. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.028
    [20] Johansson I (1999) The role of volatile organic compounds in the assessment of indoor air quality. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
    [21] Delahunty CM, Eyres G, Dufour JP (2006) Gas chromatography-olfactometry. J Separ Sci 29: 2107-2125. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200500509
    [22] Bartsch J, Uhde E, Salthammer T (2016) Analysis of odour compounds from scented consumer products using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-olfactometry. Anal Chim Acta 904: 98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.031
    [23] Mølhave L, Clausen G, Berglund B, et al. (1997) Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) in indoor air quality investigations. Indoor Air 7: 225-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.00002.x
    [24] Mandalakis M, Stephanou EG, Horii Y, et al. (2008) Emerging contaminants in car interiors: evaluating the impact of airborne PBDEs and PBDD/Fs. Environ Sci Technol 42: 6431-6436. doi: 10.1021/es7030533
    [25] Yoshida T, Matsunaga I, Tomioka K, et al. (2006) Interior air pollution in automotive cabins by volatile organic compounds diffusing from interior materials: I. Survey of 101 types of Japanese domestically produced cars for private use. Indoor Built Environ 15: 425-444.
    [26] Jo WK, Yu CH (2001) Public bus and taxicab drivers' exposure to aromatic work-time Volatile Organic Compounds. Environ Res A 86: 66-72. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4257
    [27] Batterman SA, Peng ChY, Braun J (2002) Levels and composition of volatile organic compounds on commuting routes in Detroit, Michigan. Atmos Environ 36: 6015-6030. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00770-7
    [28] Jo WK, Choi SJ (1996) Vehicle occupants' exposure to aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds while commuting on an urban-suburban route in Korea. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 46: 749-754. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1996.10467509
    [29] Weisel CP (2005) Automobile, bus and rail passenger air quality. In: Martin Hocking, editor, The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 4H: 317-334.
    [30] Jo WK, Park KH (1998) Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in automobile's cabins while commuting along a Korean urban area. Environ Int 24: 259-265. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(98)00004-X
    [31] Riediker M, Williams R, Devlin R, et al. (2003) Exposure to particulate matter, volatile organic compounds and other air pollutants inside patrol cars. Environ Sci Technol 37: 2084-2093. doi: 10.1021/es026264y
    [32] Jo WK, Park KH (1999) Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in the passenger side and the back seat of automobiles. J Expo Anal Environ Epid 9: 217-227. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500041
    [33] Grabbs JS, Corsi RL, Torres VM (2000) Volatile organic compounds in new automobiles: screening assessment. J Environ Eng 974-977.
    [34] Schlink U, Rehwagen M, Damm M, et al. (2004) Seasonal cycle of indoor-VOCs: comparison of apartments and cities. Atmos Environ 38: 1181-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.003
    [35] Yoshida T, Matsunaga I (2006) A case study on identification of airborne organic compounds and time courses of their concentration in the cabin of a new car for private use. Environ Int 32: 58-79. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.04.009
    [36] Ilgen E, Levsen K, Angerer J, et al. (2001) Aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment. Part III: personal monitoring. Atmos Environ 35: 1265-1279.
    [37] Chien YCh (2007) Variations in amounts and potential sources of volatile organic chemicals in new cars. Sci Total Environ 382: 228-239. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.022
    [38] You KW, Ge YS, Hu B, et al. (2007) Measurement of in-vehicle volatile organic compounds under static conditions. J Environ Sci 19: 1208-1213. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60197-1
    [39] Cho Y, Park DS, Kwon SB (2015) Characterization of VOC emissions from interior materials of railroad passenger cabin and preparation of environment-friendly interior materials. Korea Railroad Research Institute.
    [40] Fedoruk MJ, Kerger BD (2003) Measurement of volatile organic compounds inside automobiles. J Expo Anal Environ Epid 13: 31-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500250
    [41] Fung W, Hardcastle M (2001) Textiles in automotive engineering. The Textile Institute, Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
    [42] Tucker WG (2001) Volatile organic compounds, In: Spengler JD, Samet JM, McCarthy JF, editors, Indoor Air Quality Handbook, The McGraw – Hill Companies Inc., 31.1-31.20.
    [43] Yeganeh B, Haghighat F, Gunnarsen L, et al. (2006) Evaluation of building materials individually and in combination using odour threshold. Indoor Built Environ 15: 583-593. doi: 10.1177/1420326X06072735
    [44] Setnikova I (2014) Impact of indoor surface material on perceived air quality. Mat Sci Eng C 36: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.032
    [45] Kataoka H, Ohashi Y, Mamiya T, et al. (2012) Indoor air monitoring of volatile organic compounds and evaluation of their emission from various building materials and common products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Advanced Gas Chromatography – Progress in Agricultural, Biomedical and Industrial Applications. InTech.
    [46] Wolkoff P (1999) How to measure and evaluate volatile organic compound emissions from building products. A perspective. Sci Total Environ 227: 197-213. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00019-4
    [47] Zabiegała B (2006) Organic compounds in indoor environments. Pol J Environ Stud 15: 383-393.
    [48] Lin CC, Yu KP, Zhao P, et al. (2009) Evaluation of impact factors on VOC emissions and concentrations from wooden flooring based on chamber tests. Build Environ 44: 525-533. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.04.015
    [49] Faber J, Brodzik K, Łomankiewicz D, et al. (2012) Temperature influence on air quality inside cabin of conditioned car. Combust Engines 2: 47-56.
    [50] Van der Wal JF, Hoogeveen AW, Wouda P (2012) The influence of temperature on the emission of volatile organic compounds from PVC flooring, carpet, and paint. Indoor Air 7: 152-159.
    [51] Wypych G (2013) Handbook of odors in plastic materials. ChemTec Publishing, Toronto.
    [52] Mitchell G, Higgitt C, Gibsion LT (2014) Emissions from polymeric materials: Characterised by thermal desorption-gas chromatography. Polym Degrad Stabil 107 Z: 328-340.
    [53] Yoshida T, Matsunaga I, Tomioka K, et al. (2006) Interior air pollution in automotive cabins by volatile organic compounds diffusing from interior materials: II. Influence of manufacturer, specifications and usage status on air pollution, and estimation of air pollution levels in initial phases of delivery as a new car. Indoor Built Environ 15: 445-462.
    [54] Loock F, Lampe T, Bahadir M (1993) Examination of the emission of (semi-)volatile organic compounds from polymer materials used as interior trim materials in automobiles. Fresen J Anal Chem 347: 280-285. doi: 10.1007/BF00323973
    [55] Khare S, Morgenstern U, Beinert C (2016) Emissions of PP-Talc-compounds during injection molding process. Proceedings of 18th Conference Odour and Emissions of Plastic Materials, Universität Kassel, Germany.
    [56] Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, et al. (2001) The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epid 11: 231-252. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500165
    [57] Zhang GS, Li TT, Luo M, Lin JF, et al. (2008) Air pollution in the microenvironment of parked new cars. Build Environ 43: 315-319. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.019
    [58] Kadiyala A, Kumar A (2012) Development and application of a methodology to identify and rank the important factors affecting in-vehicle particulate matter. J Hazard Mater 213-214: 140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.072
    [59] Jo WK, Lee JH (2011) Naphthalene and benzene levels in microenvironments associated with potential exposure: new and old apartments with moth repellents, and cabins of passenger cars. Int J Environ An Ch 91: 1412-1424. doi: 10.1080/03067310903359468
    [60] Fromme H, Oddoy A, Piloty M, et al. (1998) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and diesel engine emission (elemental carbon) inside a car and a subway train. Sci Total Environ 217: 165-173. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00189-2
    [61] Chan AT, Chung MW (2003) Indoor – outdoor air quality relationship in vehicle: effect of driving environment and ventilation modes. Atmos Environ 37: 3795-3808. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00466-7
    [62] Geiss O, Tirendi S, Barrero-Moreno J, et al. (2009) Investigation of volatile organic compounds and phthalates present in the cabin air of used private cars. Environ Int 35: 1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.016
    [63] Chan CC, Spengler JD, Özkaynak H, et al. (1991) Commuter exposures to VOCs in Boston, Massachusetts. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41: 1594-1600. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1991.10466955
    [64] Rahman MM, Kim KH (2012) Exposure to hazardous volatile pollutants back diffusing from automobile exhaust systems. J Hazard Mater 241-242: 267-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.042
    [65] Chan CC, Özkaynak H, Spengler JD, et al. (1991) Driver exposure to volatile organic compounds, CO, ozone and NO2 under different driving conditions. Environ Sci Technol 25: 964-972. doi: 10.1021/es00017a021
    [66] Lee K, Sohn H, Putti K (2010) In-vehicle exposures to particulate matter and black carbon. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60: 130-136. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.2.130
    [67] Jo WK, Park KH (1999) Commuter exposure to volatile organic compounds under different driving conditions. Atmos Environ 33: 409-417. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00201-5
    [68] Parra MA, Elustondo D, Bernejo R, et al. (2008) Exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOC) in public buses of Pamplona, Northern Spain. Sci Total Environ 404: 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.028
    [69] Leung PL, Harrison RM (1999) Roadside and in-vehicle concentrations of monoaromatic hydrocarbons. Atmos Environ 33: 191-204. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00147-2
    [70] Faber J, Brodzik K, Gołda-Kopek A, et al. (2013) Benzene, toluene and xylenes levels in new and used vehicles of the same model. J Environ Sci 25: 2324-2330. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60333-7
    [71] Faber J, Brodzik K, Gołda-Kopek A, et al. (2014) Comparison of air pollution by VOCs inside the cabins of new vehicles. Environ Natural Resour Res 4: 155-165.
    [72] Brodzik K, Faber J, Gołda-Kopek A, et al. (2014) In-vehicle VOCs composition of unconditioned, newly produced cars. J Environ Sci 26: 1052-1061. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60459-3
    [73] Faber J (2014) Air quality inside new vehicles. Investigation of air quality on the basis of volatile organic compounds presence. Saarbrücken, Germany. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
    [74] Faber J, Brodzik K, Gołda-Kopek A, et al. (2013) Air pollution in new vehicles as a result of VOC emission from interior materials. Pol J Environ Stud 22: 1701-1709.
    [75] Buters JTM, Schober W, Gutermuth I, et al. (2007) Toxicity of parked motor vehicle indoor air. Environ Sci Technol 41: 2622-2629. doi: 10.1021/es0617901
    [76] Dor F, Le Moullec Y, Fresty B (1995) Exposure of city residents to carbon monoxide and monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during commuting trips in the Paris metropolitan area. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 45: 103-110. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1995.10467345
    [77] Jo WK, Song KB (2001) Exposure to volatile organic compounds for individuals with occupations associated with potential exposure to motor vehicle exhaust and/or gasoline vapor emissions. Sci Total Environ 269: 25-37. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00774-9
    [78] Som D, Dutta C, Chatterjee A, et al. (2007) Studies on commuters' exposure to BTEX in passenger cars in Kolkata, India. Sci Total Environ 372: 426-432. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.025
    [79] Lawryk NJ, Weisel CP (1996) Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in the passenger compartments of automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 30: 810-816. doi: 10.1021/es950225n
    [80] Jo WK, Lee JW (2002) In-vehicle exposure to aldehydes while commuting on real commuter routes in a Korean urban area. Environ Res A 88: 44-51. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4313
    [81] Kim YM, Harrad S, Harrison RM (2001) Concentrations and sources of VOCs in urban domestic and public microenvironments. Environ Sci Technol 35: 997-1004. doi: 10.1021/es000192y
    [82] Kingham S, Meaton J, Sheard A, et al. (1998) Assessment of exposure to traffic-related fumes during the journey to work. Transport Res D 3: 271-274.
    [83] Tokumura M, Hatayama R, Tatsu K, et al. (2016) Car indoor air pollution by volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in Japan. AIMS Environ Sci 3: 362-381. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.362
    [84] Kuo HW, Wei HC, Liu CS, et al. (2000) Exposure to volatile organic compounds while commuting in Taichung, Taiwan. Atmos Environ 34: 3331-3336. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00396-9
    [85] MnNabola A, Broderick BM, Gill LW (2009) The impacts of inter-vehicle spacing on in-vehicle air pollution concentrations in idling urban traffic conditions. Transport Res D 14:567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.08.003
    [86] Kim KH, Szulejko JE, Jo HJ, et al. (2016) Measurements of major VOCs released into the closed cabin environment of different automobiles under various engine and ventilation scenarios. Environ Pollut 215:340-346. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.033
    [87] Do DH, Van Langenhove H, Izuchukwu S, et al. (2014) Exposure to volatile organic compounds: comparison among different transportation modes. Atmos Environ 94: 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.019
    [88] JAMA Japan, JAMA Announces voluntary guidelines for reducing vehicle cabin VOC concentrations levels. 2006. Available from: http://www.jama-english.jp/release/release/2005/050214.html
    [89] GB/T 27630-2011: Guideline for air quality assessment of passenger cars. Ministry of Environmental Protection, China.
    [90] MOLIT Notification No. 2013-549 (2013) Newly manufactured vehicle indoor air quality management standard. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport MOLIT, Korea.
    [91] ISO 12219-1:2012: Interior air of road vehicles. Part 1: Whole vehicle test chamber. Specification and method for the determination of volatile organic compounds in cabin interiors.
    [92] VIAQ-05-05, Proposal for new Mutual Resolution (M.R.X) on Vehicle Air Quality (initial version), GRPE. 2016. Available from: https://www2.unece.org/wiki/download/attachments/33849349/VIAQ-05-05%20-%20VIAQ%20Recommendation%28initial%20draft%29.docx?api=v2
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Jong Bum Kim, Chang Hyeok Kim, Sujin Noh, Jeongho Kim, Kyung Hwan Kim, Ji Na Woo, Gwi-Nam Bae, Indoor air pollution in a residential building near the urban expressway, 2020, 19, 2288-9167, 128, 10.15250/joie.2020.19.2.128
    2. Argel Gastelum-Arellanez, Jovanni Esquivel-Días, Rigoberto Lopez-Padilla, Víctor Hugo Robledo, Rodríguez Paulina, Mónica Fabiola Beltrán, José Octavio Saucedo-Lucero, Assessment of persistent indoor VOCs inside public transport during winter season, 2021, 263, 00456535, 128127, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128127
    3. Bo Liang, Xiang Yu, Haipeng Mi, Di Liu, Qingqing Huang, Mi Tian, Health risk assessment and source apportionment of VOCs inside new vehicle cabins: A case study from Chongqing, China, 2019, 10, 13091042, 1677, 10.1016/j.apr.2019.06.008
    4. N.D. Buitrago, J. Savdie, S.M. Almeida, S. Cabo Verde, Factors affecting the exposure to physicochemical and microbiological pollutants in vehicle cabins while commuting in Lisbon, 2021, 270, 02697491, 116062, 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116062
    5. Aalekhya Reddam, David C. Volz, Inhalation of two Prop 65-listed chemicals within vehicles may be associated with increased cancer risk, 2021, 149, 01604120, 106402, 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106402
    6. S. M. Almeida, V. Martins, 2022, Chapter 75-1, 978-981-10-5155-5, 1, 10.1007/978-981-10-5155-5_75-1
    7. Nilusha Jayawickrama, Enric Perarnau Ollé, Jesse Pirhonen, Risto Ojala, Klaus Kivekäs, Jari Vepsäläinen, Kari Tammi, Architecture for determining the cleanliness in shared vehicles using an integrated machine vision and indoor air quality-monitoring system, 2023, 10, 2196-1115, 10.1186/s40537-023-00696-6
    8. S. M. Almeida, V. Martins, 2022, Chapter 75, 978-981-16-7679-6, 2023, 10.1007/978-981-16-7680-2_75
    9. Enric Perarnau Ollé, Jasmina Casals‐Terré, Joan Antoni López Martínez, Josep Farré‐Lladós, Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSPs): A Reliable Tool for Assessing the Selectivity of Pristine and Hybrid Polymer Nanocomposites in the Presence of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Mixtures, 2022, 1438-7492, 2200511, 10.1002/mame.202200511
    10. Anna Bukłaha, Anna Wieczorek, Ewelina Kruszewska, Piotr Majewski, Dominika Iwaniuk, Paweł Sacha, Elzbieta Tryniszewska, Piotr Wieczorek, Air Disinfection—From Medical Areas to Vehicle, 2022, 10, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820816
    11. Aalekhya Reddam, Nicholas Herkert, Heather M. Stapleton, David C. Volz, Partial dust removal in vehicles does not mitigate human exposure to organophosphate esters, 2022, 205, 00139351, 112525, 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112525
    12. Benjamin Barthod-Malat, Maxime Hauguel, Karim Behlouli, Michel Grisel, Géraldine Savary, Influence of the Compression Molding Temperature on VOCs and Odors Produced from Natural Fiber Composite Materials, 2023, 13, 2079-6412, 371, 10.3390/coatings13020371
    13. Berkay Yesildagli, Seung-Bok Lee, Jiwon Lee, Temporal variations of volatile organic compounds inside the cabin of a new electric vehicle under different operation modes during winter using proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry, 2023, 453, 03043894, 131368, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131368
    14. Xiuning Hou, Xuemin Zhang, Yulong Wang, Distribution of benzene and formaldehyde in tractor cabin: Effects of components, ventilation conditions, and vent positions, 2023, 0954-4070, 10.1177/09544070231184102
    15. Xueren Li, Yihuan Yan, Xiang Fang, Fajiang He, Jiyuan Tu, Towards understanding of inhalation exposure of pilots in the control cabin environment, 2023, 03601323, 110572, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110572
    16. Samuele Marinello, Francesco Lolli, Antonio Maria Coruzzolo, Rita Gamberini, Exposure to Air Pollution in Transport Microenvironments, 2023, 15, 2071-1050, 11958, 10.3390/su151511958
    17. Kyleigh Rhodes, Thomas Jobson, Manuel Raul Pelaez‐Samaniego, Vikram Yadama, Effect of thermal and ultraviolet exposure on volatile organic compounds emitted from basalt‐hemp reinforced polypropylene, 2023, 0272-8397, 10.1002/pc.27638
    18. Enric Perarnau Ollé, Josep Farré-Lladós, Jasmina Casals-Terré, Joan A. López Martínez, Enhanced selectivity of a 3D-printed microfluidic gas detector towards different volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the effective monitoring of indoor air quality in vehicles, 2024, 33, 23521864, 103481, 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103481
    19. Petr Čech, Zuzana Paschová, Milan Gaff, Haitao Li, František Kačík, Synthetic leathers as a possible source of chemicals and odorous substances in indoor environment, 2023, 62, 1605-8127, 10.1515/rams-2023-0132
    20. Myoungho Lee, Soyeon Lee, Jongmin Park, Chungsik Yoon, Effect of spraying air freshener on particulate and volatile organic compounds in vehicles, 2024, 916, 00489697, 170192, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170192
    21. Ángel Danilo Parra Parra, Luis Fernando Taguada Cruz, Johnny Pancha Ramos, Víctor Bravo Morocho, Study of the Incidence of CO and CO2 Gas Emission Levels and Temperature, of the Automotive Air Conditioning System Inside an Interprovincial Bus at Different Environmental and Operating Conditions, 2024, 2789-5009, 10.18502/espoch.v3i3.16622
    22. Argel Gastelum-Arellanez, José Octavio Saucedo-Lucero, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Urban Public Transportation: Seasonal Influences and Variations, 2024, 29498392, 100152, 10.1016/j.scenv.2024.100152
    23. Thawat Ngamsritrakul, Sirima Panyametheekul, Pichaya Rachdawong, Mushtaq Ahmad, Indoor air pollutants and microbes in mass rapid transit (MRT) trains of north-western area of Bangkok, Thailand: Impact on indoor air quality and human health, 2024, 26670100, 101022, 10.1016/j.envc.2024.101022
    24. Ángel Danilo Parra Parra, Luis Fernando Taguada Cruz, Johnny Pancha Ramos, Víctor Bravo Morocho, Study of the Incidence of CO and CO2 Gas Emission Levels and Temperature, of the Automotive Air Conditioning System Inside an Interprovincial Bus at Different Environmental and Operating Conditions, 2023, 2789-5009, 10.18502/espoch.v3i1.16590
    25. Anu Shrestha, Narayan Babu Dhital, In-vehicle air quality in public buses during real-world trips in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, 2024, 26670100, 101054, 10.1016/j.envc.2024.101054
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10470) PDF downloads(1654) Cited by(25)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog