Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum sequential culture in a continuous flow reactor

  • The study was conducted to evaluate fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum in a continuous-flow, high-solids reactor. Liquid medium was continuously flowed through switchgrass (2 mm particle size) at one of three flow rates: 83.33 mL h1 (2 L d−1), 41.66 mL h−1 (1 L d−1), and 20.833 mL h−1 (0.5 L d−1). The cellulolytic phase was initiated by culturing C. thermocellum (63 °C, 24 h). The temperature was decreased (35) and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum was inoculated. When metabolism decreased (96 h), the temperature was increased (63 °C; 24 h) to permit cellulosome production by C. thermocellum. The C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum was re-inoculated and the temperature returned to 35°C. The average gross production over 9 d was 1480 mg total acids (formic, acetic lactic butyric), 207 mg total solvents (acetone, butanol, ethanol), and average dry matter disappearance was 2.8 g from 25 g non-pretreated switchgrass. There was no effect of flow rate on the product formation. These results indicate that C. thermocellum can survive and produce cellulases with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicumin a continuous-flow, high-solids reactor temperature with temperature cycling.

    Citation: Noelia M. Elía, Sue E Nokes, Michael D. Flythe. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum sequential culture in a continuous flow reactor[J]. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(1): 95-103. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.1.95

    Related Papers:

    [1] Vui Thi Hoang, Diem Huong Hoang, Ngoc Duc Pham, Hanh My Tran, Ha Thi Viet Bui, Tien Anh Ngo . Hydrogen production by newly isolated Clostridium species from cow rumen in pure- and co-cultures on a broad range of carbon sources. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 846-865. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.846
    [2] Muhammad Ferhan, Yaser Dahman . Novel thermostable clostridial strains through protoplast fusion for enhanced biobutanol production at higher temperature—preliminary study. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(1): 22-36. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.1.22
    [3] Hans Mattila, Dina Kačar, Tuulia Mali, Taina Lundell . Lignocellulose bioconversion to ethanol by a fungal single-step consolidated method tested with waste substrates and co-culture experiments. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 866-879. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.866
    [4] Waraporn Apiwatanapiwat, Prapassorn Rugthaworn, Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Warunee Thanapase, Akihiko Kosugi, Takamitsu Arai, Yutaka Mori, Yoshinori Murata . Ethanol production at high temperature from cassava pulp by a newly isolated Kluyveromyces marxianus strain, TISTR 5925. AIMS Energy, 2013, 1(1): 3-16. doi: 10.3934/energy.2013.1.3
    [5] Hamid Shahandeh, Frank M. Hons, Joseph O. Storlien, Jason P. Wight . Long-term bioenergy sorghum harvest strategy and soil quality. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(4): 633-657. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.4.633
    [6] Fenglei Qi, Mark Mba Wright . A novel optimization approach to estimating kinetic parameters of the enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(1): 52-67. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.1.52
    [7] Michaela Weissgram, Thomas Ters, Hedda K. Weber, Christoph Herwig . Investigating the potential of thermophilic species for ethanol production from industrial spent sulfite liquor. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 592-611. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.592
    [8] Kamil Dino Adem, Demiss Alemu Ambie, Maria Puig Arnavat, Ulrik Birk Henriksen, Jesper Ahrenfeldt, Tobias Pape Thomsen . First injera baking biomass gasifier stove to reduce indoor air pollution, and fuel use. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 227-245. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.227
    [9] Conrad Omonhinmin, Enameguono Olomukoro, Ayodeji Ayoola, Evans Egwim . Utilization of Moringa oleifera oil for biodiesel production: A systematic review. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(1): 102-121. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.1.102
    [10] Yoshinori Murata, Hatairat Danjarean, Kiyohiko Fujimoto, Akihiko Kosugi, Takamitsu Arai, Wan Asma Ibrahim, Othman Suliman, Rokiah Hashim, Yutaka Mori . Ethanol fermentation by the thermotolerant yeast, Kluyveromyces marxianus TISTR5925, of extracted sap from old oil palm trunk. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 201-213. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.201
  • The study was conducted to evaluate fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum in a continuous-flow, high-solids reactor. Liquid medium was continuously flowed through switchgrass (2 mm particle size) at one of three flow rates: 83.33 mL h1 (2 L d−1), 41.66 mL h−1 (1 L d−1), and 20.833 mL h−1 (0.5 L d−1). The cellulolytic phase was initiated by culturing C. thermocellum (63 °C, 24 h). The temperature was decreased (35) and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum was inoculated. When metabolism decreased (96 h), the temperature was increased (63 °C; 24 h) to permit cellulosome production by C. thermocellum. The C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum was re-inoculated and the temperature returned to 35°C. The average gross production over 9 d was 1480 mg total acids (formic, acetic lactic butyric), 207 mg total solvents (acetone, butanol, ethanol), and average dry matter disappearance was 2.8 g from 25 g non-pretreated switchgrass. There was no effect of flow rate on the product formation. These results indicate that C. thermocellum can survive and produce cellulases with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicumin a continuous-flow, high-solids reactor temperature with temperature cycling.


    1. Introduction

    Lignocellulosic crops are evaluated for biofuel production because of low cost, high biomass yields and availability [1]. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a dedicated energy crop that has been used in several bioenergy conversion processes, including cellulosic ethanol production, biogas and direct combustion for thermal energy production [2]. Clostridia have the potential to convert biomass because they are often cellulolytic as well as solventogenic [3]. Such solventogenic microorganisms carrying out acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) fermentation is a promising way to make biofuels and platform chemicals [4].

    Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum is a mesophilic, solventogenic anaerobe [5]. This butanol hyperproducing bacterium has been used commercially as inoculant in butanol production [6,7,8,9]. Like many solvent-producing bacteria, C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum cannot catabolize cellulosic substrates. Clostridium thermocellum is a thermophilic anaerobe able to degrade cellulose at high rates and carry out mixed-acid fermentation [10,11]. Also, C. thermocellum combines the enzymatic production, hydrolysis and fermentation into one step, also known as consolidated bioprocessing [12]. When ABE products are desired, C. thermocellumhas been used as a biological treatment making available the sugars to solventogenic bacteria. Sequential culture of C. thermocellum ATCC 27405 and C. beijerinckii ATCC 51743 has been reported to improve product formation by the solventogenic bacterium, C. beijerinckii, when switchgrass was the substrate [13,18].

    Although, ABE fermentation is traditionally carried out in liquid batch fermentation, C. thermocellum has been reported to grow better on solid substrate cultivation (SSC) [14]. Indeed, C. thermocellum grown on solid substrates had greater ethanol yields than liquid media. However, end product inhibition occurred even though sufficient substrate remained [15]. In spite of the advantages of SSC, water availability, unfavorable osmotic conditions, fermentation acid accumulation and the resulting metabolic inhibition are still a problem [15,16,17]. Solid substrate cultivation with media replacement by periodic flushing (FSSC) maintained favorable growth conditions for C. thermocellum with constant amounts of ethanol, acetate and lactate yields [15]. Also, a recent study of C. thermocellum and solventogenic bacterium, C. beijerinckii growing on high solids lignocellulosic substrate was carried out by flushing periodically new media into the system. The results indicated that the cycling flushing improved the solvent production [18].

    The previous research employed FSSC in each case. The current study was initiated to evaluate if sequential culture of Clostridium thermocellum followed by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum could be conducted in a continuous flow, high-solids system, and to determine the effect of mobile phase flow rate on switchgrass catalysis and product formation.

    2. Materials and Method

    2.1. Strains and culture conditions

    2.1.1. Solvent-producer strain

    C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum ATCC 27021 N1-4 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The bacteria were grown anaerobically at 35 °C in basal medium containing (per L): 1.53 g Na2HPO4, 1.5 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g NH4Cl, 0.5 g (NH4)2SO4, 90 mg MgCl2·6H2O, 30 mg CaCl2, 2.0 g yeast extract, 10 mL standard vitamin mixture [19], 5.0 mL modified mineral mixture (Pfennings Metals plus 10 mg Na2WO4·2H2O and 1 mg Na2SeO3 per liter) and 1 mL resazurin (1%). The pH was adjusted to 6.7 using NaOH. The buffer, Na2CO3 (4 mg mL−1), was added after autoclaving (121 °C, 104 kPa, 20 min) once the medium cooled under O2-free CO2 gas sparge. Broth for batch liquid cultures was anaerobically dispensed into serum bottles with butyl rubber stoppers, and autoclaved. N1-4 was routinely transferred in the basal medium and the substrate (sterilized glucose, 4 g L−1) was aseptically added to the basal medium prior to inoculation.

    2.1.2. Cellulolytic strain

    C. thermocellum ATCC 27405 was maintained in our culture collection at the University of Kentucky (chain of custody: ATCC, Herbert Strobel, Michael Flythe).C. thermocellum was grown anaerobically at 63 °C in the basal medium described above. Media for batch liquid cultures was anaerobically dispensed into serum bottles with amorphous cellulose (Whatman #1 filter paper; 4.5mgmL−1) and capped with butyl rubber stoppers, and autoclaved (121 °C, 104 kPa, 20 min). C. thermocellum was transferred every 48 hours in the basal medium with the filter paper.

    2.2. Substrate preparation

    The switchgrass was obtained from small plots at the University of Kentucky’s research farm (38.13; −84.50). The switchgrass was collected in November, 2011. Switchgrass was cut at least 15.24cm high and stored in small square bales that were ground to pass through 2 screen using a hammer mill (C.S. Bell, CO. Tiffin, OH, USA. Model No. 10HMBD, Serial NO. 375 Bratt 03/05).The chemical characterization of the switchgrass was done by Dairy One Forage Testing Laboratory, Ithaca, NY.

    2.3. Continuous flow fermentation

    Continuous flow fermented switchgrass was conducted in water-jacketed Buchner funnels (hereafter called fermentation vessels; Figure 1). The fermentation vessels (500 mL working volume) contained of switchgrass (25 g, 6.15 % moisture content, ground to pass through a 2 mm screen) were autoclaved (121 °C, 104 kPa, 20 min). The fermentation vessels were sealed with rubber stoppers and continually gassed with O2 -free CO2. Basal medium (60 L total, in 10 L batches) was prepared for the continuous flow fermentation and autoclaved (121 °C, 104 kPa, 20 min). The media was pumped to the fermentation vessels using a Watson Marlow Pump (205/CA, Watson Marlow, Inc, Wilmington, Wilmington, MA) through PHARMED BPT NSF-51 tubing.

    Figure 1. Solid-substrate cultivation system with continuous product removal. 1-medium reservoir, 2-pump, 3-gas administration, 4-fermentation vessel, 5-effluent flask.

    The temperature of the fermentation vessels was set at 63 °C, and 100 mL of sterilized basal media (pH 6.7) was added to increase the water activity of the biomass. The fermentation was initiated by the inoculation of C. thermocellum (100 mL, 108 cells mL−1). This inoculum was prepared in basal media containing amorphous cellulose (Whatman #1 filter paper; 4.5 mg mL−1) and the growth was checked by optical density (absorbance 600 nm). After 24 hours, the vessel temperature was decreased to 35 °C. C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 (100mL, 108 cells mL−1) were added to the vessels. They were previously grown on basal media containing glucose (4 g L−1). After the inoculation with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, the medium pump was started to initiate the flow rate indicated: high, medium and low flow rate; 83.33 mL h−1 (2 L d−1), 41.66 mL h−1 (1Ld−1), and 20.833 mL h−1 (0.5 L d−1), respectively.

    Fermentation products were collected in a sterile Erlenmeyer flask (effluent flask). Samples were taken from the effluent flask, which was replaced daily. The samples were frozen for later analysis. The pH and acetate were measured immediately. When the acetate production decreased, the temperature of the fermentation vessels was increased to 65 °C for 24 h to permit cellulosome production by C. thermocellum. The temperature was returned to 35 °C, and the fermentation vessels were re-inoculation with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum (100 mL). After 9 d, the fermentation vessels were opened and the residual biomass was dried at 80 °C until the weight was constant. Dry weights were recorded and the residual biomass was subjected to forage analysis as described above.

    2.4. Product quantification

    The cultures were sampled as indicated. Samples (1 mL) were clarified by centrifugation (14800g, 2 min), and frozen for later analyses. The pH and acetate were measured daily. Acetate was quantified by a commercial assay that employed acetate kinase (Roche, Nutley, NJ). Acetate, ethanol, butanol, lactate and formate were quantified by HPLC (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). The anion exchange column (Aminex 87H; BioRad) was operated at 50 °C, flow rate 0.4 mL min−1. Eluting compounds were detected by UV and refractive index (Shodex/Showa) in tandem.

    2.5. Mathematical analyses

    The experiments were performed in duplicate. The data shown are the means of two replicates unless otherwise indicated. Differences were determined via Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test.

    3. Results

    The production of acetic acid was used to evaluate establishment of C. thermocellum after 24 h. When the temperature was decreased and the vessels were inoculated with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, daily acetate concentrations revealed that metabolism declined after 4d at 35 ºC (data not shown). The temperature was increased (63 ºC; 24 h) to permit cellulosome production by C. thermocellum, the temperature was returned to 35 ºC and the fermentation vessels were inoculated with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum again.

    The chemical characterization of the switchgrass before and after fermentation is shown in Table 1. During the 9 d fermentation, dry matter disappearance was approximately 2.8 g, and there was no statistical difference among treatments (Table 1). Most of the dry matter disappearance was attributable to non-fiber carbohydrate. The protein content of the switchgrass increased as much as 33% during the fermentations (P < 0.05).

    Table 1. Chemical characterization of the switchgrass before and after fermentation (% total weight).
    TreatmentMoistureCrude ProteinLigninNDFADFNFCDMD
    Initial6.15 ± 0.23.8 ± 09.45 ± 0.987.55 ± 1.956.1 ± 1.610.6 ± 0.8
    High Rate6.40 ± 0.35.7 ± 0.312.15 ± 0.586.25 ± 0.458.65 ± 1.58.85 ± 0.111.38
    Med. Rate5.15 ± 0.15.4 ± 0.111.10 ± 0.487.45 ± 0.257.95 ± 0.47.60 ± 0.110.91
    Low Rate6.60 ± 0.15.25 ± 0.410.75 ± 0.285.8 ± 2.457.15 ± 1.68.75 ± 1.514.32
    NFC: Non-Fiber Carbohydrates. ADF: Acid Detergent Fiber. NDF: Neutral Detergent Fiber. DMD: Dry Matter Disappearance.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Fermentation acids (acetic, lactic, formic and butyric acid) and solvents (butanol and ethanol) were measured each day. There was no effect of flow rate on the yields (mass product mass substrate−1), and acetic and butyric acids were the primary products (Table 2). Cumulative total production is shown in Figure 2. Approximately, 45 mg of total acids/g dried substrate and 6 mg of total solvents/g dried substrate were collected at the low flow rate. The medium and high flow rates yielded more products numerically, but again, the differences were not significant.

    Table 2. Cumulative Yield (mg product per g switchgrass dry weight) after 9 days of fermentation.
    Total product (mg g-1)AcetateButyrateLactateFormateEthanolButanol
    Low Rate22.2021.981.12--6.07
    Medium Rate34.1931.334.605.652.168.61
    High Rate 26.3340.900.570.382.617.07
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2. Total quantity of acids (acetic, lactic, butyric and formic acid) and solvents (ethanol and butanol) collected. Switchgrass (25 g, 6.15 % moisture content) was inoculated with a sequential culture of C. thermocellum and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum and basal medium was continuously flowed through the system to remove the products. Differences between flow rates were not statistically significant.

    4. Discussion

    Switchgrass is a lignocellulosic substrate that contains 29−45% cellulose, 30−37% hemicellulose and 12−19% lignin [20]. The natural resistance of lignocellulose to degradation by microorganisms requires a prior step of removing or modifying lignin structure as well as liberating the sugars from the cellulose and hemicellulose [3]. In order to avoid high cost artificial enzymatic treatments, studies using sequential cultures or co-cultures demonstrated that C. thermocellum could be used as biological pretreatment to liberate sugars from lignocellulose to be fermented for others bacteria [21,22]. Sequential culture of C. thermocellum with the solventogenic bacterium C. acetobutylicum has been already studied and the total fermentation products increased approximately 1.7−2.6 fold [23]. Sequential cultures in gas production experiments indicated C. thermocellum could be used to saccharify switchgrass, liberating sugars for C. beijerinckii to produce CO2 [13]. C. saccharoperbutylacetonicumis a close relative of C. beijerinckiiand C. acetobutylicum, which has been shown to product butanol from various substrates [8,14].

    ABE production was improved by cycling through cellulolytic and solventogenic phases, intermittent flushing of new media in high solids fermentation [18]. Solid substrate cultivation with media replacement by periodic flushing (FSSC), maintained favorable growth conditions for C. thermocellum with constant amounts of ethanol, acetate and lactate yields [15]. In this study, continuous media replacement was investigated in order to improve lignocellulose conversion. Media flow was tested at three different values (0.5 L d−1, 1.0 L d−1 and 2.0 L d−1), and no effects on catalysis or product formation were observed.

    Based on the switchgrass composition on a dry matter basis (46.6% cellulose, 31.5% hemicellulose, and 11% lignin), theoretical yield of monosaccharides, glucose and xylose from cellulose and hemicellulose (assuming just xylose), respectively; and assuming 50% of hydrolysis by the cellulolytic strain is calculated as follows:

    23.46gswitchgrass×0.47gcellulosegswitchgrass×1.11gglucosegcellulose×0.5=6.06gglucose
    23.46gswitchgrass×0.32ghemicellulosegswitchgrass×1.11gpentoseghemicellulose×0.5=4.10gpentose

    The approximate stoichiometric equations of an ABE fermentation process using standard strains and conditions [24] are (M):

    12C6H12O → 6C4H10O + 2C2H6O + 18H2 + 28CO2 + 2H2O

    Based on this equation, the theoretical yield of butanol is:

    10.16gmonosaccharide×0.2gbutanolgmonosaccharide=2.03gbutanol

    The best case (highest numerical values) observed in the current study was obtained from the medium flow rate. In that case, 2.03 g of total products were accounted for. The dry matter disappearance was 2.56 g. The difference (0.53 g) is easily attributable to CO2 production.

    Unlike other solventogenic species, in which the transition from acid to solvent fermentation is related to acetic acid and butyric acid levels, solventogenesis in C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum is constitutive [25,26]. In this case, the switchgrass was not pretreated for lignin modification or removal; thus, cellulose availability limited fermentation. It is known that C. thermocellum released more glucose when biomass was pretreated with a lignin-degrading fungus [27]. Prior studies indicated that the initial inoculum of C. thermocellum was viable even after sequentially culturing a mesophile and the cellulosome system was able to hydrolyze cellulose when the temperature was increased to 65 °C [18]. However, during that stage of 24 h at 65 °C (to reactivate the cellulolytic phase) the new media flushing was stopped. Then, water activity was lessened and it is known that lower water activity decreased the adsorption of cellulases at solid substrates with a concomitant decreased in cellulose conversion [28]. The advantages of continuous flow are to maintain moisture and continuously remove products. A disadvantage to our bench-scale system is that it requires continuous CO2, which affects product ratios. Accumulation of H2 has been shown to promote ethanol production in C. thermocellum via hydrogenase end product inhibition [29].

    5. Conclusion

    These results indicate that C. thermocellum cellulases retain activity with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum in a continuous-flow, high-solids reactor with temperature cycling. It is unclear if the additional cost of continuous flushing will be justified by the product yield. However, it is promising that the lower flushing rates were just as effective as the higher rate. Clearly, the process requires optimization, including pretreatment for lignin removal or selection of less lignified substrates. The study should be considered a proof-of-concept rather than a feasible, optimized process.

    Acknowledgments

    United States Department of Agriculture National Institute for Food and Agriculture Biomass Research and Development Initiative (Grant number #2011-10006-30363) funded the research. The information reported in this paper (15-05-083) is part of a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director. Michael Flythe was supported by USDA-ARS. The authors thank Gloria Gellin for technical assistance.

    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Perlack R, Lynn L, Wright A, et al. (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion ton annual supply. Available from: http://www.osti.gov/brigde.
    [2] Parrish D, Fike J (2005). The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit rev plant sci 24: 423-459. doi: 10.1080/07352680500316433
    [3] Demain A, Newcomb M, Wu J (2005) Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiolmolbiol rev 69: 124-54.
    [4] Qureshi N, Ezeji T (2008) Butanol, ‘a superior biofuel’ production from agricultural residues (renewable biomass): recent progress in technology. Biofuel bioprodbiores2: 319-330.
    [5] Hongo M (1960) Process for producing butanol by fermentation.US Patent 2945786.
    [6] Jones D, Keis S (1995) Origins and relationships of industrial solvent-producing clostridial strains. FEMS microbiol rev 17: 223-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00206.x
    [7] Thang V, Kanda K, KobayanshI G (2010) Production of Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol (ABE) in direct fermentation of cassava by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Applbiochembiotechnol 161: 157-170.
    [8] Al-Shorgani NK, Kalil MS, Yusoff W (2011) The effect of different carbon sources on butanol production using Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Biotechnol 10: 280-285. doi: 10.3923/biotech.2011.280.285
    [9] Al-Shorgani N, Kalil M, Yusoff W (2012) Biobutanol production from rice bran and de-oiled rice bran by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Bioprocess biosysteng35: 817-826.
    [10] McBee R (1954) The characteristics of Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol 67: 505-506.
    [11] Lynd L, Weimer P, van Zyl W, et al. (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiolmolbiol rev 66: 506-577.
    [12] Lynd L, Van Zyl W, McBride J, et al. (2005) Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: An update. Curr opin biotechnol 16: 577-583. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009
    [13] Flythe M, Elía N, Schmal M, et al. (2015) Switchgrass (Panicumvirgatum) fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium beijerinckii sequential culture: effect of feedstock particle size on gas production. Advmicrob 5: 311-316.
    [14] Chinn M, Nokes S, Strobel H (2006) Screening of thermophilic anaerobic bacteria for solid substrate cultivation on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnolprog 22: 53-59.
    [15] Dharmagadda V, Nokes S, Strobel H, et al. (2010) Investigation of the metabolic inhibition observed in solid substrate cultivation of Clostridium thermocellum on cellulose. Bioresourcetechnol101: 6039‐6044.
    [16] Chinn M, Nokes S, Strobel H (2007) Influence of process conditions on end product formation from Clostridium thermocellum 27405 in solid substrate cultivation on paper pulp sludge. Bioresourcetechnol98: 2184‐2193.
    [17] Selig M, Hsieh C, Thygesen I, et al. (2012) Considering water availability and the effect of solute concentration on high solids saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnolprog 28: 1478-1490.
    [18] Yao W, Nokes S (2014) First proof of concept of sustainable metabolite production from high solids fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass using a bacterial co-culture and cycling flush system. Bioresourcetechnol 173: 216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.113
    [19] Cotta M, Russell J (1982) Effects of peptides and amino acids on efficiency of rumen bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture. J dairy sci65: 226-234.
    [20] Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A review. Bioresourcetechnol 83: 1-11 doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7
    [21] Ng T, Weimer P, Zeikus J (1977) Cellulolytic and physiological properties of Clostridium thermocellum. Arch microbiol 114:1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00429622
    [22] Bayer E, Belaich J, Shoham Y, et al. (2004) The cellulosomes: multienzymatic machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu rev microbiol 58: 521-554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091022
    [23] Yu E, Chan M, Saddler J (1985) Butanol production from cellulosic substrates by sequential co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and C. acetobutylicum. Biotech letters 7: 509-514. doi: 10.1007/BF01199870
    [24] Ni Y, Sun ZH (2009) Recent progress on industrial fermentative production of acetone-butanol-ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in China. Appl microbiol biotechnol 83: 415-423. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2003-y
    [25] Ezeji T, Qureschi N, Blaschek H (2004) Butanol fermentation research: upstream and downstream manipulations. Chemrec 4: 305-314.
    [26] Kosaka T, Nakayama S, Nakayama K, et al. (2007) Characterization of the sol operon in butanol-hyperproducingClostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum strain N1-4 and its degeneration mechanism. Biosciniotechnolbiochem 71: 58-68.
    [27] Yao W, Nokes S (2014) Phanerochaetechrysosporium pretreatment of biomass to enhance solvent production in subsequent bacterial solid-substrate cultivation. Biomass bioenergy 62: 100-107.
    [28] Kristensen J, Felby C, Jorgensen H (2009) Yield-determining factors in high solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses. Biotechnol biofuels 2: 11. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-2-11
    [29] Li H, Knutson B, Nokes S, et al. (2012) Metabolic control of Clostridium thermocellum via inhibition of hydrogenase activity and the glucose transport rate. Appl microbiol biotechnol 93: 1777-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3812-3
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Marta Pogrzeba, Jacek Krzyżak, Szymon Rusinowski, Jon Paul McCalmont, Elaine Jensen, 2019, Chapter 1, 978-3-030-19102-3, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-19103-0_1
    2. Yuanfen Du, Wei Zou, Kaizheng Zhang, Guangbin Ye, Jiangang Yang, Advances and Applications of Clostridium Co-culture Systems in Biotechnology, 2020, 11, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560223
    3. Mohit Bibra, Sudhir Kumar, Jia Wang, Aditya Bhalla, David R. Salem, Rajesh K. Sani, Single pot bioconversion of prairie cordgrass into biohydrogen by thermophiles, 2018, 266, 09608524, 232, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.046
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4927) PDF downloads(1221) Cited by(3)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog