Citation: Ruijia Chen, Melissa A. Simon, Xinqi Dong. Gender Differences in Depressive Symptoms in U.S. Chinese Older Adults[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(1): 13-27. doi: 10.3934/Medsci.2014.1.13
[1] | XinQi Dong, Manrui Zhang . The Prevalence of Neurological Symptoms among Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(1): 35-50. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.1.35 |
[2] | Ray Marks . Narrative Review of Dance-based Exercise and Its Specific Impact on Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(1): 61-76. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.61 |
[3] | Xinqi Dong, E-Shien Chang, Stephanie Bergren . The Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Chinese older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area—Findings from the PINE Study. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(2): 87-102. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2014.2.87 |
[4] | Manrui Zhang, Melissa A. Simon, Xinqi Dong . The Prevalence of Perceived Stress among U.S. Chinese Older Adults. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(1): 40-56. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2014.1.40 |
[5] | E-Shien Chang, Xinqi Dong . Personality Traits among Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(2): 73-86. doi: 10.3934/Medsci.2014.2.73 |
[6] | Ruijia Chen, XinQi Dong . The Prevalence and Correlates of Gambling Participation among Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults in the U.S.. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(2): 90-103. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.2.90 |
[7] | Xinqi Dong, Manrui Zhang, Melissa A. Simon . Self-mastery among Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(1): 57-72. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2014.1.57 |
[8] | XinQi Dong . Addressing Health and Well-being of U.S. Chinese Older Adults through Community-Based Participatory Research: Introduction to the PINE Study. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(3): 261-270. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.3.261 |
[9] | Xinqi Dong, E-Shien Chang, Melissa A. Simon . Sense of Community among Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area: Findings from the PINE Study. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(1): 28-39. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2014.1.28 |
[10] | Xinqi Dong, E-Shien Chang, Stephanie Bergren BA . The Burden of Grandparenting among Chinese older adults in the Greater Chicago area—The PINE Study. AIMS Medical Science, 2014, 1(2): 125-140. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2014.2.125 |
Depression is a widespread mental health issue and is predicted to be the second leading cause of disability worldwide by 2020 [1]. Older adults are disproportionally affected by depressive symptoms [2]. It is estimated that 15%-20% of older adults suffer from significant depressive symptoms [3]. The presence of depressive symptoms may result in adverse health outcomes, including physical and cognitive impairment [4] increased levels of social isolation, the occurrence of other mental health issues such as anxiety and hopelessness [5], and elder mistreatment [6,7]. More importantly, depressive symptoms are linked to increased mortality and suicide risks [8,9]. Yet AIMS Medical Science Volume 1, Issue 1, 13-27 the study of depressive symptoms in older adults is fraught with many challenges, such as older adults tending to assume that depression is a part of the normal aging process and thus are less likely to seek treatment in a timely manner. In addition, detecting depressive symptoms in older adults may be very complicated, as depressive symptoms may be associated with medical commodities, functional impairments and comorbid dementia disorders [10].
Gender may be one of the most salient factors that influence the occurrence, manifestation and recognition of depressive symptoms. There is a large body of literature suggesting that women are more susceptible to depressive symptoms than men [11,12]. A variety of psychological factors, socio-cultural factors, and biological factors such as hormonal changes may contribute to gender differences in rates of depressive symptoms. However, prior studies on gender differences in depressive symptoms in late life have yielded inconsistent results, with some studies showing no gender difference in rates of depressive symptoms [13] and others suggesting that older women experienced higher rates of depressive symptoms than older men [14,15]. The variations may be attributed to differences in settings, sample procedures and assessment tools. Thus far, gender differences in depressive symptoms among older adults remain less clear.
The study on gender differences in depressive symptoms cannot be separated from the familial and cultural context in which they occur. Traditional gender norms may play roles in shaping gender differences in depressive symptoms. Historically, guided by patriarchal cultural values, Chinese women are expected to be subordinate to men and therefore of lower social status. The gender inequality in Chinese culture has resulted in women facing educational, economic and health care disadvantages [16]. Thus, social expectations of gender roles in Chinese culture may lead to variations in depressive symptoms among Chinese older men and women. Prior studies on depressive symptoms consistently demonstrate gender differences in depressive symptoms varied by cultural context [17,18]. Yet existing knowledge of gender differences in depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults, especially among U.S. Chinese older adults is scarce.
The Chinese population is the largest Asian American subgroup population in the U.S., numbering 4 million in 2010 [19]. Acculturation stress brought about by cultural and linguistic barriers may predispose Chinese older adults to higher risk for depressive symptoms [20]. Additionally, disparities in health care access along with the influence of traditional values in emotional restraint may prevent Chinese older adults from seeking timely professional help. Depressive symptoms may be detrimental to individuals and families of U.S. Chinese older adults [10]. Notwithstanding the scope and severity of the issue, there is a dearth of investigations examining gender differences in depressive symptoms in U.S. community-dwelling Chinese older adults. The objectives of this study are to: 1) examine the gender differences in depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese older adults; and 2) explore the correlates of depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese older men and older women.
The Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago (PINE) is a community-engaged, population-based epidemiological study of U.S. Chinese older adults aged 60 and over conducted in the greater Chicago area. Briefly, the purpose of the PINE study is to collect community-level data of U.S. Chinese older adults to examine the key cultural determinants of health and well-being. The project was initiated by a synergistic community-academic collaboration among the Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Northwestern University, and many community-based social services agencies and organizations throughout the greater Chicago area [22].
In order to ensure study relevance to the well-being of the Chinese community and increase community participation, the PINE study implemented extensive culturally and linguistically appropriate community recruitment strategies strictly guided by a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The formation of this community-academic partnership allowed us to develop appropriate research methodology in accordance with the local Chinese cultural context, in which a community advisory board (CAB) plays a pivotal role in providing insights and strategies for conducting research. Board members were community stakeholders and residents enlisted through over twenty civic, health, social and advocacy groups, community centers and clinics in the city and suburbs of Chicago. The board works extensively with investigative team to develop and examine study instrument to ensure cultural sensitivity and appropriateness.
Over twenty social services agencies, community centers, health advocacy agencies, faith-based organizations, senior apartments and social clubs served as the basis of study recruitment sites. Community-dwelling older adults who aged 60 years and over and self-identified as Chinese were eligible to participant in the study. Out of 3, 542 eligible older adults approached, 3, 159 agreed to participate in the study, yielding a response rate of 91.9 %.
Our bilingual research team translated the scales into Chinese and back translated it into English. The translations were further scrutinized by investigators to ensure content and face validity. The Participant signed a consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Rush University Medical Center prior to the interview. Trained multicultural and multilingual interviewers conducted face-to-face home interviews with participants in their preferred language and dialects, such as English, Cantonese, Taishanese, Mandarin, or Teochew dialect. Data were collected using state-of-science innovative web-based software which recorded simultaneously in English, Chinese traditional and simplified characters. This transformative technological platform minimized any information that may have been “lost in translation”, thus providing deeper meaning to the data collected.
Based on the available census data drawn from U.S. Census 2010 and a random block census project conducted in the Chinese community in Chicago, the PINE study is representative of the Chinese aging population in the greater Chicago area with respect to key demographic attributes, including age, sex, income, education, number of children, and country of origin. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Rush University Medical Center.
Basic demographic information included age (in years), sex (female and male), education (years of education completed), personal income (0-$4, 999 per year; $5, 000-$9, 999 per year; $10, 000-$14, 999 per year; $15, 000-$19, 999 per year; or more than $20, 000 per year), marital status (married, separated, divorced, or widowed), number of children, number of grandchildren and living arrangement (living alone, living with 1 person, living with 2-3 persons, or living with 4 or more persons). Number of years in the community and years in the U.S. were also assessed in all participants.
In general, how would you rate your health?” on a four-point scale (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good). Quality of life was assessed by asking “In general, how would you rate your quality of life?” also on a four-point scale ranging from 1 = poor to 4 = very good. Health changes over the last year was measured by “Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health now?” on a three-point scale (1 = worsened, 2 = same, 3 = improved).
We used the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults. The PHQ-9 consists of nine items assessing each of the nine symptoms of depression from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [23] Participants were asked if they had the following symptoms in the last two weeks: (1) changes in sleep; (2) changes in appetite; (3) fatigue; (4) feelings of sadness or irritability; (5) loss of interest in activities; (6) inability to experience pleasure, feelings of guilt or worthlessness; (7) inability to concentrate or make decisions; (8) feeling restless or slowed down; and (9) suicide thoughts. Respondents indicated answers to each question on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = “not at all” to 3 = “nearly every day.”
The total score could range from 0-27, with a score of 1-4 indicating minimal level of depressive symptoms, 5-9 indicating mild level of depressive symptoms, 10-14 indicating moderate level of depressive symptoms and 15 and more indicating severe level of depressive symptoms [24]. The PHQ-9 has been validated among Chinese Americans and has good inter-rater reliability [25]. The standardized Cronbach’s alpha of the PHQ-9 in the PINE study was 0.82 [26].
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic information of the older men and women with any depressive symptoms. Chi-square statistics and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the prevalence of different levels of depressive symptoms in each health status group. Pearson Correlation coefficients and Spearman’s rank correlation were calculated to examine the correlations of socio-demographic and health related factors depressive symptoms in older women and older men. Analyses were carried out using SAS, Version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
This study consisted of 1, 831 older women and 1, 328 older men. More than half of the older women (59.2%) reported having depressive symptoms, as compared to 48.5% of the older men. The characteristics of older women and older men with any depressive symptom are presented in Table1. Compared to the group of older men with any depressive symptoms, the group of older women with any depressive symptom had a higher proportion of older adults who had no education at all (10.2% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001), had more than four children (32.5% vs. 24.9%, P < 0.01), had more than three grandchildren (71.4% vs. 59.2%, P < 0.001), were widowed (38.4% vs. 7.2%, P < 0.001), and lived alone (28.7% vs. 13.0%, P < 0.001).
Men 639 (48.5%) | Women 1, 078 (59.2%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Age, N (%) | 131 (20.5) | 218 (20.2) | 2.42 | 4 | 0.66 |
60–64 | |||||
65–69 | 117 (18.3) | 195 (18.1) | |||
70–74 | 120 (18.8) | 210 (19.5) | |||
75–79 | 113 (17.7) | 216 (20.0) | |||
80 and over | 158 (24.7) | 239 (22.2) | |||
Education (yr), N(%) | 7 (1.1) | 109 (10.2) | 81.2 | 4 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–6 | 205 (32.2) | 431 (40.2) | |||
7–12 | 252 (39.6) | 350 (32.7) | |||
13 –16 | 152 (23.9) | 164 (15.3) | |||
17 and over | 21 (3.3) | 18 (1.7) | |||
Income (USD), N (%) | 245 (38.5) | 326 (30.5) | 18.8 | 4 | < 0.001 |
$0–$4, 999 | |||||
$5, 000–$9, 999 | 319 (50.2) | 608 (56.8) | |||
$10, 000–$14, 999 | 45 (7.1) | 106 (9.9) | |||
$15, 000–$19, 999 | 18 (2.8) | 15 (1.4) | |||
$20, 000 and over | 9 (1.4) | 15 (1.4) | |||
Marital status, N (%) | 553 (87.0) | 616 (57.6) | 1 98.4 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Married | |||||
Separated | 15 (2.4) | 22 (2.1) | |||
Divorced | 22 (3.5) | 21 (2.0) | |||
Widowed | 46 (7.2) | 410 (38.4) | |||
Number of children, N (%) | 37 (5.8) | 48 (4.5) | 13.7 | 3 | 0. 003 |
0 | |||||
1 | 87 (13.6) | 111 (10.3) | |||
2–3 | 355 (55.6) | 569 (52.7) | |||
4 and more | 159 (24.9) | 350 (32.5) | |||
Number of grandchildren, N (%) | 100 (15.8) | 92 (8.6) | 32.0 | 2 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–2 | 159 (25.1) | 214 (20.0) | |||
3 and more | 375 (59.2) | 765 (71.4) | |||
Living arrangement, N (%) | 83 (13.0) | 309 (28.7) | 56.7 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Living alone | |||||
1 | 303 (47.6) | 404 (37.5) | |||
2–3 | 103 (16.1) | 145 (13.5) | |||
4 or more | 149 (23.3) | 220 (20.4) | |||
Years in the U.S., N (%) | 191 (29.9) | 275 (25.7) | 4.15 | 3 | 0 .25 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 199 (31.1) | 336 (31.4) | |||
21–30 | 141 (22.1) | 262 (24.5) | |||
31 and more | 108 (16.9) | 198 (18.5) | |||
Years in the community, N (%) | 395 (62.0) | 631(58.8) | 3.02 | 3 | 0 .39 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 138 (21.7) | 252 (23.5) | |||
21–30 | 69 (10.8) | 113 (10.5) | |||
31 and more | 35 (5.5) | 77 (7.2) | |||
Overall health status, N (%) | 25 (3.9) | 23 (2.1) | 7.0 | 3 | 0 .07 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 165 (25.8) | 252 (23.4) | |||
Fair | 279 (43.7) | 482 (44.7) | |||
Poor | 169 (26.6) | 321 (29.8) | |||
Quality of life, N (%) | 39 (6.1) | 64 (5.9) | 8.53 | 3 | 0 .04 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 219 (34.3) | 432 (40.1) | |||
Fair | 347 (54.3) | 546 (50.6) | |||
Poor | 34 (5.3) | 36 (3.3) | |||
Health changes over the last year, N (%) | 53 (8.3) | 99 (9.2) | 0.64 | 2 | 0 .72 |
Improved | |||||
Same | 229 (35.8) | 394 (36.6) | |||
Worsened | 357 (55.9) | 584 (54.2) |
The prevalence of each depressive symptom in older women and men is presented in Table2. All symptoms assessed by the PHQ-9 were more prevalent among older women. In particular, compared with older men, a greater percentage of older women reported that they had little interest or pleasure in doing things (17.3% vs. 13.7%, P < 0.01); felt down, depressed, or hopeless (16.7% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001); had sleeping disturbances (39.6% vs. 27.3%, P < 0.001); felt tired or had little energy (34.8% vs. 24.3%, P < 0.001); had poor appetite or over-ate (11.6% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001); was unable to concentrate or make decisions (16.0% vs. 12.4%, P < 0.05); and had suicide thoughts (4.7% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001). No significant gender differences were found for feelings of guilt or worthlessness (10.4% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.13) and feeling restless or slowed down (16.3% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.05).
PHQ–9 Items | Not at all N (%) | Several days N (%) | More than half of days, N (%) | Nearly every day, N (%) | P | ||||
Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | ||
Little interest or pleasure in doing things | 1, 136 (86.4) | 1, 503 (82.8) | 79 (6.0) | 134 (7.4) | 56 (4.3) | 96 (5.3) | 44 (3.4) | 83 (4.6) | 0.007 |
Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless | 1, 157 (87.9) | 1, 519 (83.4) | 89 (6.8) | 144 (7.9) | 40 (3.0) | 92 (5.1) | 30 (2.3) | 67 (3.7) | < 0.001 |
Trouble falling, staying asleep or too much | 959 (72.7) | 1, 102 (60.4) | 165 (12.5) | 316 (17.3) | 75 (5.8) | 182 (10.0) | 119 (9.0) | 225 (12.3) | < 0.001 |
Feeling tired or having little energy | 998 (75.7) | 1, 188 (65.2) | 165 (12.5) | 285 (15.6) | 79 (6.0) | 175 (9.6) | 76 (5.8) | 175 (9.6) | < 0.001 |
Poor appetite or overeating | 1, 230 (93.3) | 1, 610 (88.3) | 45 (3.4) | 90 (4.9) | 27 (2.1) | 64 (3.5) | 17 (1.3) | 59 (3.2) | < 0.001 |
Feeling bad about oneself — or that you are a failure or have let yourself | 1, 204 (91.4) | 1, 624 (89.6) | 55 (4.2) | 87 (4.8) | 30 (2.3) | 66 (3.6) | 29 (2.2) | 36 (2.0) | 0.13 |
Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching TV | 1, 155 (87.7) | 1, 522 (84.0) | 85 (6.5) | 141 (7.8) | 46 (3.5) | 92 (5.1) | 31 (2.4) | 56 (3.1) | 0.03 |
Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed | 1, 128 (85.7) | 1, 512 (83.6) | 96 (7.3) | 141 (7.8) | 52 (4.0) | 109 (6.0) | 41 (3.1) | 46 (2.5) | 0.05 |
Thoughts you would be better off dead, or of hurting in some way | 1, 293 (98.1) | 1, 726 (95.3) | 14 (1.1) | 58 (3.2) | 2 (0.2) | 11 (0.6) | 9 (0.7) | 17 (0.9) | < 0.001 |
The prevalence of depressive symptoms by different levels is presented in Table3. Significant gender differences were found with respect to the severity of depressive symptoms. Among those who reported any depressive symptoms, 66.7% of older men had minimal depressive symptoms, compared with 60.5% of older women. Among those who reported any depressive symptoms, moderate to severe depressive symptoms were more prevalent in women (16.6%) than in men (12.0%).
Men, N (%) | Women, N (%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Minimal (1–4) | 426 (66.7) | 652 (60.5) | 9.45 | 3 | 0.02 |
Mild (5–9) | 136 (21.3) | 247 (22.9) | |||
Moderate(10–14) | 57 (8.9) | 121 (11.2) | |||
Severe (15–27) | 20 (3.1) | 58 (5.4) |
The gender specific distribution of overall health status, quality of life and health changes in the past year is presented in Table4. Having any depressive symptom was most prevalent among older adults with poor overall health status. In addition, compared to their male counterparts, a higher percentage of older women with poor health status had depressive symptoms (85.9% vs. 77.2%, P < 0.01), and in particular, severe depressive symptoms (12.1% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.05).
Overall health status |
Very good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Note: Percentage represents prevalence of depressive symptoms within each of the health status group. | ||||||||||||
Any symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
25(36.8) 21 (30.9) 3(4.2) 1(1.5) 0 |
23(32.4) 18(46.2) 3(4.4) 2(2.8) 0 |
0.59 0.47 0.96 0.39 1 |
165(34.3) 131(30.1) 29 (6.0) 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4) |
252(41.2) 184(27.2) 54 (8.8) 13 (2.1) 1(0.2) |
0.02 0.30 0.08 0.04 0.33 |
279 (50.8) 200(36.4) 57 (10.4) 17(3.1) 5 (0.9) |
482(62.8) 333(43.4) 96 (12.5) 41 (5.4) 15 (1.6) |
< 0.001 0.01 0.23 0.05 0.30 |
169(77.2) 74 (33.5) 47 (21.3) 36 (16.3 13(5.9) |
322(85.9) 117(31.4) 94 (25.2) 65 (17.4) 45 (12.1) |
0.005 0.59 0.28 0.72 0.01 |
Quality of Life |
Very Good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Any Symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
39(44.3) 35(39.8) 3(3.4) 1(1.1) 0 |
64(50.4) 39(30.7) 21(16.5) 4(3.2) 0 |
0.38 0.17 0.00 0.34 1 |
219(41.2) 156(29.3) 40(7.5) 18(3.4) 5(0.9) |
432(51.0) 290(34.2) 88(10.4) 42(5.0) 12(1.4) |
< 0.001 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.43 |
347 (53.6) 221(34.2) 83(12.8) 32 (5.0) 11 (1.7) |
545(68.1) 313(39.1) 126(15.8) 69 (8.6) 37 (4.6) |
< 0.001 0.05 0.11 0.006 0.002 |
34 (65.4) 14 (26.9) 10 (19.2) 6 (12.8) 4 (7.7) |
36 (76.6) 9 (19.2) 12 (25.5) 6 (11.5) 9 (19.2) |
0.22 0.36 0.45 0.85 0.06 |
Health changes |
Improved | Same | Worse | |||||||||
Men N(%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | ||||
Any symptom Minimal(1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe(15–27) |
53 (47.8) 38 (34.2) 10 (9.0) 4 (3.6) 1 (0.9) |
99 (60.7) 67 (41.1) 23 (14.1) 6(3.7) 3 (1.8) |
0.03 0.25 0.20 0.26 0.34 |
229 (34.5) 171 (25.8) 43 (6.5) 12 (1.8) 3(0.5) |
394 (45.4) 287 (33.1) 77 (8.9) 23 (2.7) 7 (0.8) |
< 0.001 0.00 0.08 0.27 0.39 |
357 (65.5) 217 (39.8) 83 (15.2) 41 (7.5) 16 (2.9) |
583 (73.8) 297 (37.6) 147 (18.6) 91 (11.5) 48 (6.1) |
0.001 0.41 0.11 0.02 0.01 |
Likewise, the prevalence of any depressive symptoms was highest among female older adults with the lowest level of quality of life. The proportion of older women with severe depressive symptoms in those with fair quality of life was significantly higher than that of older men with fair quality of life (4.6% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01), but no significant gender difference of severe symptoms were found among those who reported poor quality of life.
Older adults with worsened health status had the highest proportion of people reporting depressive symptom(s). The prevalence of moderate and severe depressive symptoms in older women with worsened health status was all significantly higher than that of older men with worsened health status.
The socio-demographic and health related correlates of any depressive symptom among older women is presented in Table5. Older age (r = 0.09, P < 0.001), lower income (r = 0.07, P < 0.01), poorer health status (r = 0.34, P < 0.001), inferior quality of life (r = 0.17, P < 0.001) and worsening health changes over the past year (r = 0.23, P < 0.001) were positively correlated with any depressive symptom in older women.
Age | Edu | Income | MS | Living | Children | Yrs in U.S. | Yrs in com | Origin | OHS | QOL | HC | ADS | |
Age | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Edu | -0.18*** | ||||||||||||
Income | -0.04 | 0.11*** | |||||||||||
MS | -0.44*** | 0.20*** | -0.03 | ||||||||||
Living | -0.32*** | -0.03 | -0.10*** | 0.26*** | |||||||||
Children | 0.32*** | -0.40*** | -0.07** | -0.14*** | -0.03 | ||||||||
Yrs in U.S. | 0.38*** | -0.09*** | 0.30*** | -0.24*** | -0.29*** | 0.13*** | |||||||
Yrs in com | 0.26*** | -0.09*** | 0.19*** | -0.16*** | -0.20*** | 0.08*** | 0.67*** | ||||||
Origin | 0.03 | -0.08*** | -0.20*** | 0.05* | 0.06* | 0.08*** | -0.23*** | 0.15*** | |||||
OHS | -0.08*** | 0.05* | 0.10*** | 0.04 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09*** | 0.07** | ||||
QOL | 0.03 | 0.10*** | 0.06** | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.07** | 0.31*** | |||
HC | -0.13*** | 0.03 | 0.05* | 0.07** | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.06** | 0.01 | 0.33*** | 0.14*** | ||
ADS | 0.09 *** | -0.01 | -0.07** | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.34*** | -0.17*** | -0.23*** |
We also examined the correlates of any depressive symptom in older men. Older age (r = 0.08, P < 0.001), being unmarried (r = 0.06, P < 0.05), lower income (r = 0.11, P < 0.01), fewer years in the community (r = 0.06, P < 0.05), poorer health status (r = 0.28, P < 0.001), inferior quality of life (r = 0.12, P < 0.001) and worsening health changes over the past year (r = 0.25, P < 0.001) were positively correlated with any depressive symptom in older men.
This study demonstrates that depressive symptoms are more prevalent in U.S. Chinese older women than in older men. The prevalence of all depressive symptoms of the PHQ-9, especially somatic symptoms, was higher in older women than in older men. In addition, older women were more likely to report moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Older age, lower income, poorer health status, inferior quality of life and worsening health status were positively correlated with any depressive symptom in both gender groups. However, being unmarried and fewer years in the community were positively correlated with any depressive symptoms in older men but not in older women.
This study represents the first large scale investigation on gender differences in depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese community-dwelling older adults. It lays the groundwork for a more comprehensive understanding of how depressive symptoms in older adults may vary across gender and cultural groups. Our academic-community partnership and community engagement facilitated the design of culturally and linguistically appropriate research methods [27]. Due to our CBPR approach, participants may have been more comfortable conversing in their preferred dialects, more trusting of research assistants, and more willing to express emotions and acknowledge their feelings.
This study suggests that depressive symptoms are more prevalent in U.S. Chinese older women than in older men, consistent with the majority of studies of older adults in both community and clinical settings. Using the PHQ-9, a recent study of 1, 659 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 to 85 years in German showed that 62.4% of older women had depressive symptoms, compared with 51.1% of older men [14]. In the U.S., a study of 2, 732 older patients aged 60 years and over in the clinical setting reported that 17.8% of the older women had life time depression, compared with 9.4% of older men. The prevalence of current depression in the older women (10.6%) was also higher than in the older men (5.7%) when assessed using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,(DSM-III-R) [28].
Our finding is also consistent with studies among Chinese older adults, which generally suggest that older women are more likely to present depressive symptoms. In a study of 1, 062 Chinese older adults aged 65 years and older in Singapore, the prevalence of depression in older women (6.1%) was slightly higher than that in older men (5.9%) [29]. In a community sample survey of older adults in southern Taiwan, older women also reported a higher prevalence of depression than older men (21.8% vs. 14.0%) [30]. Several reasons may account for gender disparities in the prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults; one key factor is that older women tend to be exposed to more negative life events in later life than older men. For instance, the subordinate role of women in Chinese culture may make older women more vulnerable to elder abuse, especially domestic abuse. Prior studies have consistently demonstrated the association between depressive symptoms and elder abuse [20,31]. We suspect that violence against women may in part be driving the high prevalence of depressive symptoms in Chinese women. In addition, compared with older men, U.S. Chinese older women may encounter greater cultural, language and transportation barriers as well as financial hardship, increasing their risk for experiencing depressive symptoms.
In addition to gender differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms, this study also suggests a tendency for older women to report moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Similar findings are reported by a study of 50 community-dwelling Chinese older immigrants in New York, in which older women reported having higher rates of moderate to severe depressive symptoms than older men (4.0% vs. 0%) [32]. Variations in stress coping strategies may contribute to the observed gender differences in the severity of depressive symptoms. For example, men may be more likely to use problem-focused and rational coping strategies, while women tend to adopt emotion-focused and avoidance coping strategies [33]. Thus, older women’s adaptation of rumination as the primary stress coping strategy may maintain or worsen symptoms of depression. We are aware that depressive symptoms are more severe in immigrant women, particularly among those who are separated from their children or grandchildren due to immigration. Obsessive worry about children in the home country and longing for family reunification may exacerbate depressive symptoms among U.S. Chinese older women.
This study also supports earlier studies that found that manifestations of depressive symptoms differed by gender. Somatic depressive symptoms such as sleeping disturbances or fatigue are much more prevalent in older women than in older men. A study using data on major depression from the National Comorbidity Survey found that women exhibited a higher prevalence of somatic depression than men [34]. One explanation may be that women are more likely to assume the primary caregiver role—a role that may require substantial physical and emotional demands. In addition to providing care to the spouse, in Chinese culture, older women often take on the task of raising grandchildren. Taking care of grandchildren may trigger positive emotional effects such as high levels of self-esteem, but may also exacerbate stress and burden, resulting in sleep disturbances or fatigue in older adults. There is also evidence to suggest that somatic depression in women may be associated with anxiety disorders and chronic pain [35]. Future studies should explore the factors associated with somatic depressive symptoms in older adults, and among older women in particular.
In line with prior studies, this study suggests that overall health status may be an important indicator for depressive symptoms in older adults. In particular, moderate to severe depressive symptoms was more prevalent in older women with poorer overall health status. This may be explained by higher levels of perceived burdensomeness among older women who are ill. Due to cultural and language barriers, older Chinese women with illness may have to depend on adult children for scheduling doctor’s appointments and taking them to the doctor’s clinic. Such intensive demands on support from adult children may result in older women’s higher levels of perceived burdensomeness and depressive symptoms. The inverse association between health and depression indicates that depressive symptoms may contribute to poorer health outcomes in older adults. The presence of depressive symptoms may inhibit older adults’ ability to perform physical activities, giving rise to unhealthy behaviors such as poor diet and insufficient sleep that may affect the health status of older adults.
Interestingly, marital status is significantly correlated with any depressive symptom in men but not with that in women, which corresponds to previous studies on gender differences in the association between marital status and depression. In a study of 3, 056 community-dwelling older Dutch individuals, the risk of depressive symptoms for men who were not or were no longer married (OR = 2.51, CI = 1.69-3.91) was higher than that for women (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.07-2.29) [15]. This is perhaps due to differences in the nature of social engagement among older men and women. Women are more likely to develop and maintain close confiding relationships with persons other than the spouse. In contrast, men may have smaller social networks in later life and may depend largely on their spouse’s emotional and instrument support, which makes it more difficult for them to adjust to life after spousal death [36]. Similarly, we found that years in the community is negatively correlated with any depressive symptom in older men but not with that in older women. We suspect that men may experience greater financial and social status losses due to relocation. As a consequence, residential transitions may have greater adverse psychological effects on older men than on older women.
The findings of the study should be interpreted with limitations in mind. First, reporting bias may be present in this study, and may vary by gender. It is possible that older women are more willing to openly express psychological distress, thereby resulting in higher rates of depressive symptoms. Second, this study did not examine gender differences in the link between intergenerational relationships and depressive symptoms. Given the role of family relationship in the well-being of Chinese older adults, it may be of considerable importance to take into account the contributions of intergenerational relationships when examining gender differences. Third, this study aimed to understand depressive symptoms and we did not delve into the complex issue of clinical depression. Future studies should continue to examine the optimal cut-off point for clinical depression among U.S. Chinese older adults and improve our understanding of the scope of clinical depression in this vulnerable population. Additionally, gender differences may also persist in patterns of health seeking behaviors among those with depressive symptoms. Understanding differences in health seeking behaviors may facilitate the diagnosis of depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese older adults. Lastly, this study utilizes a cross-sectional design, so we could not postulate on potential temporal relationships. Future longitudinal studies are needed to explore risk factors and outcomes associated with depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese older women and older men.
This study has important implications for researchers, mental health professionals, community service workers, and policy makers. First, community-based mental health services should be tailored to meet the specific needs of older women. In doing so, community organizations should: prioritize educational workshops that focus on the relevant knowledge regarding depressive symptoms among older women, address violence and abuse closely associated with depressive symptoms, and enhance stress management and coping skills among older adults, especially older women. Second, health care professionals should be educated on gender-specific depressive symptoms and the culturally effective approaches to tackle the symptoms. Specific attention should be given to those who are with older age, lower income, and poor health status and quality of life.
This study demonstrates that U.S. Chinese older women are more prone to depressive symptoms than older men. Moreover, significant gender differences in the prevalence, symptom manifestation, severity, and correlates of depressive symptoms exist among U.S. Chinese older adults. This study highlights the need to develop tailored interventions for depressive symptoms in this subgroup of U.S. Chinese older adults. Future longitudinal studies are needed to better understand gender differences in risk factors and outcomes associated with depressive symptoms in U.S. Chinese older adults.
This work was supported by National Institute on Aging grants (R01 AG042318, R01 MD006173, R01 CA163830, R34MH100443, R34MH100393, P20CA165588, R24MD001650 & RC4 AG039085), Paul B. Beeson Award in Aging, The Starr Foundation, American Federation for Aging Research, John A. Hartford Foundation and The Atlantic Philanthropies.
The authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.
[1] | Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1996) Evidence-based health policy—lessons from the global burden of disease study. Science 274(5288): 740-743 |
[2] | Beekman AT, Copeland JR, Prince MJ (1999) Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. Brit J Psychiat 174(4): 307-311. |
[3] | Gallo JJ, Lebowitz BD (1999) The epidemiology of common late-life mental disorders in the community: themes for the new century. Psychiat Serv 50(9): 1158-1166. |
[4] | Potter GG, Steffens DC (2007) Contribution of depression to cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults. Neurologist 13(3): 105-117. |
[5] | Penninx BW, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, et al. (1998) Depressive symptoms and physical decline in community-dwelling older persons. JAMA 279(21): 1720-1726. |
[6] | Dong X, Beck TT, Simon MA (2010) The association of gender, depression and elder mistreatment in a community-dwelling population: the modifying effect of social support. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics 50(2): 202-208. |
[7] |
Dong X, Chang ES. , Wong E, et al. (2014). Association of depressive symptomatology and elder mistreatment in a US Chinese population: findings from a community-based participatory research study. J Agres Maltreat Trauma 23(1): 81-98. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2014.864740
![]() |
[8] | Schulz R, Beach SR, Ives DG, et al. (2000) Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Int Med 160(12): 1761. |
[9] | Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Caine ED (2002) Risk factors for suicide in later life. Biol Psychiat52(3): 193-204. |
[10] | Blazer DG (2003) Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol Series A: Biol Sci Med Sci 58(3): M249-M265. |
[11] | Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Swartz M, et al. (1993) Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. J Affect Disord 29(2):85-96. |
[12] | Marcus SM, Young EA, Kerber KB, et al. (2005) Gender differences in depression: findings from the STAR* D study. J Affect Disord 87(2): 141-150. |
[13] | Brown DR, Milburn NG, Gary LE (1992) Symptoms of depression among older African-Americans: An analysis of gender differences. Gerontologist 32(6): 789-795. |
[14] | Glaesmer H, Riedel-Heller S, Braehler E, et al. (2011) Age- and gender-specific prevalence and risk factors for depressive symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Int Psychogeriat23(8): 1294. |
[15] | Sonnenberg CM, Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, et al. (2000) Sex differences in late life depression. Acta Psychiat Scand 101(4): 286-292. |
[16] | Li J (2004) Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county. Soc Sci Med 59(4): 695-708. |
[17] | Culbertson FM (1997) Depression and gender: an international review. Am Psychologist 52(1):25. |
[18] | Zunzunegui MV, Minicuci N, Blumstein T, et al. (2007) Gender differences in depressive symptoms among older adults: a cross-national comparison. Soc Psychiat Psychiatry Epidemiol42(3): 198-207. |
[19] | American Community Survey (2011) Available from https://www. census. gov/acs/www/Accessed on 2011. |
[20] | Dong X, Chang E-S, Simon M (2011) Depression in the Chinese aging population: leveraging cultural humility to improve the quality of care of a vulnerable population. Aging Health 7(6):849-863. |
[21] | Dong X, Chang E-S, Wong E, et al. (2012) The perceptions, social determinants, and negative health outcomes associated with depressive symptoms among US Chinese older adults. Gerontologist 52(5): 650-663. |
[22] | Dong X, Wong E, Simon MA (2014) Study design and implementation of the PINE study. J Aging Health 0898264314526620. |
[23] | American Psychiatric Association (1994) Dignostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. |
[24] | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9): 606-613. |
[25] | Yeung A, Fung F, Yu SC, et al. (2008) Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 for depression screening among Chinese Americans. Compr Psychiatry 49(2): 211-217. |
[26] | Chang E-S, Todd B, Simon MA, et al. (2014) A psychometric assessment of the psychological and social well-being indicators in the PINE study. Aging Health in press. |
[27] | Dong X, Chang E-S, Wong E, et al. (2011) Working with culture: lessons learned from a community-engaged project in a Chinese aging population. Aging Health 7(4): 529-537. |
[28] | Barry KL, Fleming MF, Manwell LB, et al. (1998) Prevalence of and factors associated with current and lifetime depression in older adult primary care patients. Family Med 30: 366-371. |
[29] | Heok K, Meng K, Calvin F, et al. (1996) Comorbidity of depression in the elderly:"an epidemiological study in a Chinese community. Int J Geriat Psychiat 11(8): 699-704. |
[30] | Chiu HC, Chen CM, Huang CJ, et al. (2005) Depressive symptoms, chronic medical conditions and functional status: a comparison of urban and rural elders in Taiwan. Int J Geriat Psychiat 20(7): 635-644. |
[31] | Dong X, Chen R, Chang ES, et al. (2012) Elder abuse and psychological well-being: A systematic review and implications for research and policy—A mini review. Gerontology 59(2): 132-142. |
[32] | Mui AC (1996) Depression among elderly Chinese immigrants: An exploratory study. Soc Work41(6): 633-645. |
[33] | Matud MP (2004) Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personal Indiv Diff 37(7):1401-1415. |
[34] | Silverstein B (1999) Gender difference in the prevalence of clinical depression: the role played by depression associated with somatic symptoms. Am J Psychiat 156(3): 480-482. |
[35] | Silverstein B (2002) Gender differences in the prevalence of somatic versus pure depression: a replication. Am J Psychiat 159(6): 1051-1052. |
[36] | Umberson D, Wortman CB, Kessler RC (1992) Widowhood and depression: Explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. J Health Soc Behav 33(1): 10-24. |
1. | XinQi Dong, Ruijia Chen, Gender differences in the experience of loneliness in U.S. Chinese older adults, 2017, 29, 0895-2841, 115, 10.1080/08952841.2015.1080534 | |
2. | Xinqi Dong, Mengting Li, Yingxiao Hua, The Association Between Filial Discrepancy and Depressive Symptoms: Findings From a Community-Dwelling Chinese Aging Population, 2017, 72, 1079-5006, S63, 10.1093/gerona/glx040 | |
3. | XinQi Dong, Stephanie M. Bergren, E-Shien Chang, Traditional Chinese Medicine Use and Health in Community-Dwelling Chinese-American Older Adults in Chicago, 2015, 63, 00028614, 2588, 10.1111/jgs.13828 | |
4. | Naglaa A. El-Sherbiny, Asmaa Younis, Mohamed Masoud, A comprehensive assessment of the physical, nutritional, and psychological health status of the elderly populace in the Fayoum Governorate (Egypt), 2016, 66, 01674943, 119, 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.001 | |
5. | Jinkyung Cho, Youngyun Jin, Inhwan Lee, Haeryun Hong, Donghyun Kim, Soohyun Park, Hyunsik Kang, Physical inactivity and cognitive impairment in Korean older adults: gender differences in potential covariates, 2017, 44, 0301-4460, 729, 10.1080/03014460.2017.1392604 | |
6. | Jinyu Liu, XinQi Dong, Duy Nguyen, Daniel W. L. Lai, Family Relationships and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Older Immigrants in the United States, 2017, 72, 1079-5006, S113, 10.1093/gerona/glw138 | |
7. | XinQi Dong, Dexia Kong, Dinesh Mendhe, Stephanie M. Bergren, Leveraging Technology to Improve Health Disparity Research: Trilingual Data Collection Using Tablets, 2019, 67, 0002-8614, 10.1111/jgs.16097 | |
8. | Xiaochuan Wang, Stephanie Bergren, XinQi Dong, Association Between Social Support and Depression Help-Seeking Behaviors Among U.S. Chinese Older Adults, 2023, 35, 0898-2643, 83, 10.1177/08982643221106870 | |
9. | Ethan Siu Leung Cheung, Ada C. Mui, Gender Variation and Late-life Depression: Findings from a National Survey in the USA, 2023, 48, 0163-5158, 263, 10.1007/s12126-021-09471-5 | |
10. | Li-Chi Huang, Ching-Ling Lin, Yao-Tsung Chang, Ruey-Yu Chen, Chyi-Huey Bai, Gender Impact on Diabetes Distress Focus at Medical Communication Concerns, Life and Interpersonal Stress, 2022, 19, 1660-4601, 15678, 10.3390/ijerph192315678 | |
11. | Sizhe Liu, Wei Zhang, Keqing Zhang, Bei Wu, The Association between Intergenerational Support and Self-Rated Health among Chinese Older Adults: Do Resilience and Gender Matter?, 2023, 42, 0733-4648, 111, 10.1177/07334648221127882 | |
12. | Magdalena Żebrowska, Susanne Strohmaier, Curtis Huttenhower, A. Heather Eliassen, Oana A. Zeleznik, Carri Westgarth, Tianyi Huang, Francine Laden, Jaime E. Hart, Bernard Rosner, Ichiro Kawachi, Jorge E. Chavarro, Olivia I. Okereke, Eva S. Schernhammer, Pet Attachment and Anxiety and Depression in Middle-Aged and Older Women, 2024, 7, 2574-3805, e2424810, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24810 | |
13. | Ethan Siu Leung Cheung, The Association between Residential Environment and Self-Rated Mental Health among Older Canadians: The Moderating Effects of Education and Gender, 2024, 0714-9808, 1, 10.1017/S0714980824000230 |
Men 639 (48.5%) | Women 1, 078 (59.2%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Age, N (%) | 131 (20.5) | 218 (20.2) | 2.42 | 4 | 0.66 |
60–64 | |||||
65–69 | 117 (18.3) | 195 (18.1) | |||
70–74 | 120 (18.8) | 210 (19.5) | |||
75–79 | 113 (17.7) | 216 (20.0) | |||
80 and over | 158 (24.7) | 239 (22.2) | |||
Education (yr), N(%) | 7 (1.1) | 109 (10.2) | 81.2 | 4 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–6 | 205 (32.2) | 431 (40.2) | |||
7–12 | 252 (39.6) | 350 (32.7) | |||
13 –16 | 152 (23.9) | 164 (15.3) | |||
17 and over | 21 (3.3) | 18 (1.7) | |||
Income (USD), N (%) | 245 (38.5) | 326 (30.5) | 18.8 | 4 | < 0.001 |
$0–$4, 999 | |||||
$5, 000–$9, 999 | 319 (50.2) | 608 (56.8) | |||
$10, 000–$14, 999 | 45 (7.1) | 106 (9.9) | |||
$15, 000–$19, 999 | 18 (2.8) | 15 (1.4) | |||
$20, 000 and over | 9 (1.4) | 15 (1.4) | |||
Marital status, N (%) | 553 (87.0) | 616 (57.6) | 1 98.4 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Married | |||||
Separated | 15 (2.4) | 22 (2.1) | |||
Divorced | 22 (3.5) | 21 (2.0) | |||
Widowed | 46 (7.2) | 410 (38.4) | |||
Number of children, N (%) | 37 (5.8) | 48 (4.5) | 13.7 | 3 | 0. 003 |
0 | |||||
1 | 87 (13.6) | 111 (10.3) | |||
2–3 | 355 (55.6) | 569 (52.7) | |||
4 and more | 159 (24.9) | 350 (32.5) | |||
Number of grandchildren, N (%) | 100 (15.8) | 92 (8.6) | 32.0 | 2 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–2 | 159 (25.1) | 214 (20.0) | |||
3 and more | 375 (59.2) | 765 (71.4) | |||
Living arrangement, N (%) | 83 (13.0) | 309 (28.7) | 56.7 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Living alone | |||||
1 | 303 (47.6) | 404 (37.5) | |||
2–3 | 103 (16.1) | 145 (13.5) | |||
4 or more | 149 (23.3) | 220 (20.4) | |||
Years in the U.S., N (%) | 191 (29.9) | 275 (25.7) | 4.15 | 3 | 0 .25 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 199 (31.1) | 336 (31.4) | |||
21–30 | 141 (22.1) | 262 (24.5) | |||
31 and more | 108 (16.9) | 198 (18.5) | |||
Years in the community, N (%) | 395 (62.0) | 631(58.8) | 3.02 | 3 | 0 .39 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 138 (21.7) | 252 (23.5) | |||
21–30 | 69 (10.8) | 113 (10.5) | |||
31 and more | 35 (5.5) | 77 (7.2) | |||
Overall health status, N (%) | 25 (3.9) | 23 (2.1) | 7.0 | 3 | 0 .07 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 165 (25.8) | 252 (23.4) | |||
Fair | 279 (43.7) | 482 (44.7) | |||
Poor | 169 (26.6) | 321 (29.8) | |||
Quality of life, N (%) | 39 (6.1) | 64 (5.9) | 8.53 | 3 | 0 .04 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 219 (34.3) | 432 (40.1) | |||
Fair | 347 (54.3) | 546 (50.6) | |||
Poor | 34 (5.3) | 36 (3.3) | |||
Health changes over the last year, N (%) | 53 (8.3) | 99 (9.2) | 0.64 | 2 | 0 .72 |
Improved | |||||
Same | 229 (35.8) | 394 (36.6) | |||
Worsened | 357 (55.9) | 584 (54.2) |
PHQ–9 Items | Not at all N (%) | Several days N (%) | More than half of days, N (%) | Nearly every day, N (%) | P | ||||
Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | ||
Little interest or pleasure in doing things | 1, 136 (86.4) | 1, 503 (82.8) | 79 (6.0) | 134 (7.4) | 56 (4.3) | 96 (5.3) | 44 (3.4) | 83 (4.6) | 0.007 |
Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless | 1, 157 (87.9) | 1, 519 (83.4) | 89 (6.8) | 144 (7.9) | 40 (3.0) | 92 (5.1) | 30 (2.3) | 67 (3.7) | < 0.001 |
Trouble falling, staying asleep or too much | 959 (72.7) | 1, 102 (60.4) | 165 (12.5) | 316 (17.3) | 75 (5.8) | 182 (10.0) | 119 (9.0) | 225 (12.3) | < 0.001 |
Feeling tired or having little energy | 998 (75.7) | 1, 188 (65.2) | 165 (12.5) | 285 (15.6) | 79 (6.0) | 175 (9.6) | 76 (5.8) | 175 (9.6) | < 0.001 |
Poor appetite or overeating | 1, 230 (93.3) | 1, 610 (88.3) | 45 (3.4) | 90 (4.9) | 27 (2.1) | 64 (3.5) | 17 (1.3) | 59 (3.2) | < 0.001 |
Feeling bad about oneself — or that you are a failure or have let yourself | 1, 204 (91.4) | 1, 624 (89.6) | 55 (4.2) | 87 (4.8) | 30 (2.3) | 66 (3.6) | 29 (2.2) | 36 (2.0) | 0.13 |
Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching TV | 1, 155 (87.7) | 1, 522 (84.0) | 85 (6.5) | 141 (7.8) | 46 (3.5) | 92 (5.1) | 31 (2.4) | 56 (3.1) | 0.03 |
Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed | 1, 128 (85.7) | 1, 512 (83.6) | 96 (7.3) | 141 (7.8) | 52 (4.0) | 109 (6.0) | 41 (3.1) | 46 (2.5) | 0.05 |
Thoughts you would be better off dead, or of hurting in some way | 1, 293 (98.1) | 1, 726 (95.3) | 14 (1.1) | 58 (3.2) | 2 (0.2) | 11 (0.6) | 9 (0.7) | 17 (0.9) | < 0.001 |
Men, N (%) | Women, N (%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Minimal (1–4) | 426 (66.7) | 652 (60.5) | 9.45 | 3 | 0.02 |
Mild (5–9) | 136 (21.3) | 247 (22.9) | |||
Moderate(10–14) | 57 (8.9) | 121 (11.2) | |||
Severe (15–27) | 20 (3.1) | 58 (5.4) |
Overall health status |
Very good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Note: Percentage represents prevalence of depressive symptoms within each of the health status group. | ||||||||||||
Any symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
25(36.8) 21 (30.9) 3(4.2) 1(1.5) 0 |
23(32.4) 18(46.2) 3(4.4) 2(2.8) 0 |
0.59 0.47 0.96 0.39 1 |
165(34.3) 131(30.1) 29 (6.0) 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4) |
252(41.2) 184(27.2) 54 (8.8) 13 (2.1) 1(0.2) |
0.02 0.30 0.08 0.04 0.33 |
279 (50.8) 200(36.4) 57 (10.4) 17(3.1) 5 (0.9) |
482(62.8) 333(43.4) 96 (12.5) 41 (5.4) 15 (1.6) |
< 0.001 0.01 0.23 0.05 0.30 |
169(77.2) 74 (33.5) 47 (21.3) 36 (16.3 13(5.9) |
322(85.9) 117(31.4) 94 (25.2) 65 (17.4) 45 (12.1) |
0.005 0.59 0.28 0.72 0.01 |
Quality of Life |
Very Good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Any Symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
39(44.3) 35(39.8) 3(3.4) 1(1.1) 0 |
64(50.4) 39(30.7) 21(16.5) 4(3.2) 0 |
0.38 0.17 0.00 0.34 1 |
219(41.2) 156(29.3) 40(7.5) 18(3.4) 5(0.9) |
432(51.0) 290(34.2) 88(10.4) 42(5.0) 12(1.4) |
< 0.001 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.43 |
347 (53.6) 221(34.2) 83(12.8) 32 (5.0) 11 (1.7) |
545(68.1) 313(39.1) 126(15.8) 69 (8.6) 37 (4.6) |
< 0.001 0.05 0.11 0.006 0.002 |
34 (65.4) 14 (26.9) 10 (19.2) 6 (12.8) 4 (7.7) |
36 (76.6) 9 (19.2) 12 (25.5) 6 (11.5) 9 (19.2) |
0.22 0.36 0.45 0.85 0.06 |
Health changes |
Improved | Same | Worse | |||||||||
Men N(%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | ||||
Any symptom Minimal(1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe(15–27) |
53 (47.8) 38 (34.2) 10 (9.0) 4 (3.6) 1 (0.9) |
99 (60.7) 67 (41.1) 23 (14.1) 6(3.7) 3 (1.8) |
0.03 0.25 0.20 0.26 0.34 |
229 (34.5) 171 (25.8) 43 (6.5) 12 (1.8) 3(0.5) |
394 (45.4) 287 (33.1) 77 (8.9) 23 (2.7) 7 (0.8) |
< 0.001 0.00 0.08 0.27 0.39 |
357 (65.5) 217 (39.8) 83 (15.2) 41 (7.5) 16 (2.9) |
583 (73.8) 297 (37.6) 147 (18.6) 91 (11.5) 48 (6.1) |
0.001 0.41 0.11 0.02 0.01 |
Age | Edu | Income | MS | Living | Children | Yrs in U.S. | Yrs in com | Origin | OHS | QOL | HC | ADS | |
Age | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Edu | -0.18*** | ||||||||||||
Income | -0.04 | 0.11*** | |||||||||||
MS | -0.44*** | 0.20*** | -0.03 | ||||||||||
Living | -0.32*** | -0.03 | -0.10*** | 0.26*** | |||||||||
Children | 0.32*** | -0.40*** | -0.07** | -0.14*** | -0.03 | ||||||||
Yrs in U.S. | 0.38*** | -0.09*** | 0.30*** | -0.24*** | -0.29*** | 0.13*** | |||||||
Yrs in com | 0.26*** | -0.09*** | 0.19*** | -0.16*** | -0.20*** | 0.08*** | 0.67*** | ||||||
Origin | 0.03 | -0.08*** | -0.20*** | 0.05* | 0.06* | 0.08*** | -0.23*** | 0.15*** | |||||
OHS | -0.08*** | 0.05* | 0.10*** | 0.04 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09*** | 0.07** | ||||
QOL | 0.03 | 0.10*** | 0.06** | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.07** | 0.31*** | |||
HC | -0.13*** | 0.03 | 0.05* | 0.07** | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.06** | 0.01 | 0.33*** | 0.14*** | ||
ADS | 0.09 *** | -0.01 | -0.07** | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.34*** | -0.17*** | -0.23*** |
Men 639 (48.5%) | Women 1, 078 (59.2%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Age, N (%) | 131 (20.5) | 218 (20.2) | 2.42 | 4 | 0.66 |
60–64 | |||||
65–69 | 117 (18.3) | 195 (18.1) | |||
70–74 | 120 (18.8) | 210 (19.5) | |||
75–79 | 113 (17.7) | 216 (20.0) | |||
80 and over | 158 (24.7) | 239 (22.2) | |||
Education (yr), N(%) | 7 (1.1) | 109 (10.2) | 81.2 | 4 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–6 | 205 (32.2) | 431 (40.2) | |||
7–12 | 252 (39.6) | 350 (32.7) | |||
13 –16 | 152 (23.9) | 164 (15.3) | |||
17 and over | 21 (3.3) | 18 (1.7) | |||
Income (USD), N (%) | 245 (38.5) | 326 (30.5) | 18.8 | 4 | < 0.001 |
$0–$4, 999 | |||||
$5, 000–$9, 999 | 319 (50.2) | 608 (56.8) | |||
$10, 000–$14, 999 | 45 (7.1) | 106 (9.9) | |||
$15, 000–$19, 999 | 18 (2.8) | 15 (1.4) | |||
$20, 000 and over | 9 (1.4) | 15 (1.4) | |||
Marital status, N (%) | 553 (87.0) | 616 (57.6) | 1 98.4 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Married | |||||
Separated | 15 (2.4) | 22 (2.1) | |||
Divorced | 22 (3.5) | 21 (2.0) | |||
Widowed | 46 (7.2) | 410 (38.4) | |||
Number of children, N (%) | 37 (5.8) | 48 (4.5) | 13.7 | 3 | 0. 003 |
0 | |||||
1 | 87 (13.6) | 111 (10.3) | |||
2–3 | 355 (55.6) | 569 (52.7) | |||
4 and more | 159 (24.9) | 350 (32.5) | |||
Number of grandchildren, N (%) | 100 (15.8) | 92 (8.6) | 32.0 | 2 | < 0.001 |
0 | |||||
1–2 | 159 (25.1) | 214 (20.0) | |||
3 and more | 375 (59.2) | 765 (71.4) | |||
Living arrangement, N (%) | 83 (13.0) | 309 (28.7) | 56.7 | 3 | < 0.001 |
Living alone | |||||
1 | 303 (47.6) | 404 (37.5) | |||
2–3 | 103 (16.1) | 145 (13.5) | |||
4 or more | 149 (23.3) | 220 (20.4) | |||
Years in the U.S., N (%) | 191 (29.9) | 275 (25.7) | 4.15 | 3 | 0 .25 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 199 (31.1) | 336 (31.4) | |||
21–30 | 141 (22.1) | 262 (24.5) | |||
31 and more | 108 (16.9) | 198 (18.5) | |||
Years in the community, N (%) | 395 (62.0) | 631(58.8) | 3.02 | 3 | 0 .39 |
0–10 | |||||
11–20 | 138 (21.7) | 252 (23.5) | |||
21–30 | 69 (10.8) | 113 (10.5) | |||
31 and more | 35 (5.5) | 77 (7.2) | |||
Overall health status, N (%) | 25 (3.9) | 23 (2.1) | 7.0 | 3 | 0 .07 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 165 (25.8) | 252 (23.4) | |||
Fair | 279 (43.7) | 482 (44.7) | |||
Poor | 169 (26.6) | 321 (29.8) | |||
Quality of life, N (%) | 39 (6.1) | 64 (5.9) | 8.53 | 3 | 0 .04 |
Very good | |||||
Good | 219 (34.3) | 432 (40.1) | |||
Fair | 347 (54.3) | 546 (50.6) | |||
Poor | 34 (5.3) | 36 (3.3) | |||
Health changes over the last year, N (%) | 53 (8.3) | 99 (9.2) | 0.64 | 2 | 0 .72 |
Improved | |||||
Same | 229 (35.8) | 394 (36.6) | |||
Worsened | 357 (55.9) | 584 (54.2) |
PHQ–9 Items | Not at all N (%) | Several days N (%) | More than half of days, N (%) | Nearly every day, N (%) | P | ||||
Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | ||
Little interest or pleasure in doing things | 1, 136 (86.4) | 1, 503 (82.8) | 79 (6.0) | 134 (7.4) | 56 (4.3) | 96 (5.3) | 44 (3.4) | 83 (4.6) | 0.007 |
Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless | 1, 157 (87.9) | 1, 519 (83.4) | 89 (6.8) | 144 (7.9) | 40 (3.0) | 92 (5.1) | 30 (2.3) | 67 (3.7) | < 0.001 |
Trouble falling, staying asleep or too much | 959 (72.7) | 1, 102 (60.4) | 165 (12.5) | 316 (17.3) | 75 (5.8) | 182 (10.0) | 119 (9.0) | 225 (12.3) | < 0.001 |
Feeling tired or having little energy | 998 (75.7) | 1, 188 (65.2) | 165 (12.5) | 285 (15.6) | 79 (6.0) | 175 (9.6) | 76 (5.8) | 175 (9.6) | < 0.001 |
Poor appetite or overeating | 1, 230 (93.3) | 1, 610 (88.3) | 45 (3.4) | 90 (4.9) | 27 (2.1) | 64 (3.5) | 17 (1.3) | 59 (3.2) | < 0.001 |
Feeling bad about oneself — or that you are a failure or have let yourself | 1, 204 (91.4) | 1, 624 (89.6) | 55 (4.2) | 87 (4.8) | 30 (2.3) | 66 (3.6) | 29 (2.2) | 36 (2.0) | 0.13 |
Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching TV | 1, 155 (87.7) | 1, 522 (84.0) | 85 (6.5) | 141 (7.8) | 46 (3.5) | 92 (5.1) | 31 (2.4) | 56 (3.1) | 0.03 |
Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed | 1, 128 (85.7) | 1, 512 (83.6) | 96 (7.3) | 141 (7.8) | 52 (4.0) | 109 (6.0) | 41 (3.1) | 46 (2.5) | 0.05 |
Thoughts you would be better off dead, or of hurting in some way | 1, 293 (98.1) | 1, 726 (95.3) | 14 (1.1) | 58 (3.2) | 2 (0.2) | 11 (0.6) | 9 (0.7) | 17 (0.9) | < 0.001 |
Men, N (%) | Women, N (%) | χ2 | d.f | P-value | |
Minimal (1–4) | 426 (66.7) | 652 (60.5) | 9.45 | 3 | 0.02 |
Mild (5–9) | 136 (21.3) | 247 (22.9) | |||
Moderate(10–14) | 57 (8.9) | 121 (11.2) | |||
Severe (15–27) | 20 (3.1) | 58 (5.4) |
Overall health status |
Very good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Note: Percentage represents prevalence of depressive symptoms within each of the health status group. | ||||||||||||
Any symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
25(36.8) 21 (30.9) 3(4.2) 1(1.5) 0 |
23(32.4) 18(46.2) 3(4.4) 2(2.8) 0 |
0.59 0.47 0.96 0.39 1 |
165(34.3) 131(30.1) 29 (6.0) 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4) |
252(41.2) 184(27.2) 54 (8.8) 13 (2.1) 1(0.2) |
0.02 0.30 0.08 0.04 0.33 |
279 (50.8) 200(36.4) 57 (10.4) 17(3.1) 5 (0.9) |
482(62.8) 333(43.4) 96 (12.5) 41 (5.4) 15 (1.6) |
< 0.001 0.01 0.23 0.05 0.30 |
169(77.2) 74 (33.5) 47 (21.3) 36 (16.3 13(5.9) |
322(85.9) 117(31.4) 94 (25.2) 65 (17.4) 45 (12.1) |
0.005 0.59 0.28 0.72 0.01 |
Quality of Life |
Very Good |
P |
Good |
P |
Fair |
P |
Poor |
P |
||||
Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | |||||
Any Symptom Minimal (1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe (15–27) |
39(44.3) 35(39.8) 3(3.4) 1(1.1) 0 |
64(50.4) 39(30.7) 21(16.5) 4(3.2) 0 |
0.38 0.17 0.00 0.34 1 |
219(41.2) 156(29.3) 40(7.5) 18(3.4) 5(0.9) |
432(51.0) 290(34.2) 88(10.4) 42(5.0) 12(1.4) |
< 0.001 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.43 |
347 (53.6) 221(34.2) 83(12.8) 32 (5.0) 11 (1.7) |
545(68.1) 313(39.1) 126(15.8) 69 (8.6) 37 (4.6) |
< 0.001 0.05 0.11 0.006 0.002 |
34 (65.4) 14 (26.9) 10 (19.2) 6 (12.8) 4 (7.7) |
36 (76.6) 9 (19.2) 12 (25.5) 6 (11.5) 9 (19.2) |
0.22 0.36 0.45 0.85 0.06 |
Health changes |
Improved | Same | Worse | |||||||||
Men N(%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | Men N (%) | Women N (%) | P | ||||
Any symptom Minimal(1–4) Mild (5–9) Moderate(10–14) Severe(15–27) |
53 (47.8) 38 (34.2) 10 (9.0) 4 (3.6) 1 (0.9) |
99 (60.7) 67 (41.1) 23 (14.1) 6(3.7) 3 (1.8) |
0.03 0.25 0.20 0.26 0.34 |
229 (34.5) 171 (25.8) 43 (6.5) 12 (1.8) 3(0.5) |
394 (45.4) 287 (33.1) 77 (8.9) 23 (2.7) 7 (0.8) |
< 0.001 0.00 0.08 0.27 0.39 |
357 (65.5) 217 (39.8) 83 (15.2) 41 (7.5) 16 (2.9) |
583 (73.8) 297 (37.6) 147 (18.6) 91 (11.5) 48 (6.1) |
0.001 0.41 0.11 0.02 0.01 |
Age | Edu | Income | MS | Living | Children | Yrs in U.S. | Yrs in com | Origin | OHS | QOL | HC | ADS | |
Age | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Edu | -0.18*** | ||||||||||||
Income | -0.04 | 0.11*** | |||||||||||
MS | -0.44*** | 0.20*** | -0.03 | ||||||||||
Living | -0.32*** | -0.03 | -0.10*** | 0.26*** | |||||||||
Children | 0.32*** | -0.40*** | -0.07** | -0.14*** | -0.03 | ||||||||
Yrs in U.S. | 0.38*** | -0.09*** | 0.30*** | -0.24*** | -0.29*** | 0.13*** | |||||||
Yrs in com | 0.26*** | -0.09*** | 0.19*** | -0.16*** | -0.20*** | 0.08*** | 0.67*** | ||||||
Origin | 0.03 | -0.08*** | -0.20*** | 0.05* | 0.06* | 0.08*** | -0.23*** | 0.15*** | |||||
OHS | -0.08*** | 0.05* | 0.10*** | 0.04 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09*** | 0.07** | ||||
QOL | 0.03 | 0.10*** | 0.06** | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.07** | 0.31*** | |||
HC | -0.13*** | 0.03 | 0.05* | 0.07** | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.06** | 0.01 | 0.33*** | 0.14*** | ||
ADS | 0.09 *** | -0.01 | -0.07** | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.34*** | -0.17*** | -0.23*** |