Research article

Knowledge, attitudes on falls and awareness of hospitalized patient's fall risk factors among the nurses working in Tertiary Care Hospitals

  • Received: 26 December 2021 Revised: 09 April 2022 Accepted: 13 April 2022 Published: 27 April 2022
  • Background 

    Fall is the most common patient safety incident in health care organizations. This study was initiated to obtain information regarding knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nurses to device evidence-based and multidisciplinary educational and training programs to improve patient safety and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality associated with falls.

    Methods 

    A descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 339 registered nurses working in Tertiary care hospitals across Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. A modified version of the previously validated standard questionnaire was administered by the investigators through an online survey method to explore the level of knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of inpatient fall risk factors among Nurses.

    Results 

    In this study, 15.6% of participants had adequate knowledge of falls, 57.2% had a favorable attitude towards falls and 38.3% had adequate awareness of fall risk factors. Years of experience in nursing has a statistically significant association with the level of knowledge on fall. The participant's attitude towards falls had a statistically significant relationship with age, education, experience in nursing, and previous patient fall experience. The correlation between fall knowledge, the attitude toward falls, and awareness of fall risk factors were highly significant. The majority of the participants expressed their favorable attitude toward the need for fall preventive education.

    Conclusion 

    In our study, it is evident that there is a void that has to be filled to improve the knowledge, attitude, and awareness of falls and their risk factors. There is a need for extensive education and holistic, multifactorial, and interdisciplinary training program to be undertaken through various health care organizations.

    Citation: Kavin Mozhi James, Divya Ravikumar, Sindhura Myneni, Poonguzhali Sivagananam, Poongodi Chellapandian, Rejili Grace Joy Manickaraj, Yuvasree Sargunan, Sai Ravi Teja Kamineni, Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan, Malathi Kullappan, Surapaneni Krishna Mohan. Knowledge, attitudes on falls and awareness of hospitalized patient's fall risk factors among the nurses working in Tertiary Care Hospitals[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 304-321. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022013

    Related Papers:

    [1] John V. Rider, Shannon Martin, Erin Vieira . Do older adults take action to reduce fall risk after attending a community-based fall risk screening?. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(4): 464-479. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024032
    [2] Juliet A Harvey, Sebastien FM Chastin, Dawn A Skelton . What happened to my legs when I broke my arm?. AIMS Medical Science, 2018, 5(3): 252-258. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2018.3.252
    [3] Adeniyi Ayinde Abdulwahab, Deborah Oluwaseun Shomuyiwa, Nwachuya Chukwuemeka Augustine, Akwue Marytheresa Chinaza, Muhsinah Adesewa Abdulwasiu, Agada Emmanuella Chinecherem, Usman Ridwan Kolade, Timileyin Omolayo Awolola, Taiwo Olawehinmi, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi . Challenges facing pharmaceutical care provision in Nigerian tertiary hospitals: A short review. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(4): 486-495. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022026
    [4] Ami Rokach . Healthcare workers: diminishing burnout symptoms through self-care. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(1): 55-68. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023006
    [5] Ola Shawky, Maha Alkhaldi, Deema Yousef, Adnan Alhindi, Teef Alosaimi, Amjad Jawhari, Aliah Aladwani . Incidence of first-time stroke in Taif, Saudi Arabia. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 293-303. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022012
    [6] Mobina Tahmasebivand, Farhad Soltani, Leila Kouti, Mandana Izadpanah . Frequency and risk factors of polypharmacy and drug interactions among patients in general intensive care unit of Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz, southwest of Iran. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(2): 69-78. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020006
    [7] XinQi Dong, Manrui Zhang . The Prevalence of Neurological Symptoms among Chinese Older Adults in the Greater Chicago Area. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(1): 35-50. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.1.35
    [8] Sebastien FM Chastin, Juliet A Harvey, Philippa M Dall, Lianne McInally, Alexandra Mavroeidi, Dawn A Skelton . Beyond “#endpjparalysis”, tackling sedentary behaviour in health care. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(1): 67-75. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.1.67
    [9] Waled Amen Mohammed Ahmed . Anxiety and Related Symptoms among Critical Care Nurses in Albaha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(4): 303-309. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.4.303
    [10] Ayema Haque, Areeba Minhaj, Areeba Ahmed, Owais Khan, Palvisha Qasim, Hasan Fareed, Fatima Nazir, Ayesha Asghar, Kashif Ali, Sobia Mansoor . A meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of thromboembolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(4): 301-310. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020020
  • Background 

    Fall is the most common patient safety incident in health care organizations. This study was initiated to obtain information regarding knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nurses to device evidence-based and multidisciplinary educational and training programs to improve patient safety and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality associated with falls.

    Methods 

    A descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 339 registered nurses working in Tertiary care hospitals across Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. A modified version of the previously validated standard questionnaire was administered by the investigators through an online survey method to explore the level of knowledge & attitude on falls and awareness of inpatient fall risk factors among Nurses.

    Results 

    In this study, 15.6% of participants had adequate knowledge of falls, 57.2% had a favorable attitude towards falls and 38.3% had adequate awareness of fall risk factors. Years of experience in nursing has a statistically significant association with the level of knowledge on fall. The participant's attitude towards falls had a statistically significant relationship with age, education, experience in nursing, and previous patient fall experience. The correlation between fall knowledge, the attitude toward falls, and awareness of fall risk factors were highly significant. The majority of the participants expressed their favorable attitude toward the need for fall preventive education.

    Conclusion 

    In our study, it is evident that there is a void that has to be filled to improve the knowledge, attitude, and awareness of falls and their risk factors. There is a need for extensive education and holistic, multifactorial, and interdisciplinary training program to be undertaken through various health care organizations.



    A fall is defined as an event that results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level [1]. Falls and their consequences are major public health problems, making them the second leading cause of accidental deaths worldwide [2]. Fall is reported as the most frequent patient safety event occurring in hospitals [3]. Falls occur at a rate of 3–5 per 1000 occupied bed days, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates that each year 700000 to 1 million hospitalized patients fall [4]. Nearly one in every three inpatients aged 65 years and older sustains a fall. The traumatic complications of falls include physical injury, functional impairment, increased rate of hospitalization, and delayed recovery as a result people suffer a lot with a huge burden to the family, health sector, and economy of the country [5][7]. A significant proportion of non-traumatic falls, often instill fear of fall- a post-fall syndrome which includes dependency, loss of autonomy, confusion, immobilization, and depression, which will lead to a further restriction in daily activities and thus affects Quality of life [8],[9]. Despite the continued efforts to decrease falls in hospital settings, there continues to be an increased incidence of inpatient falls. Nurses are the true backbone of any health facility. They provide constant care to patients and they must be properly trained to identify risk factors and employ strategies to prevent them. Due to demanding work schedules, lack of awareness, and complex patient profiles, there are high chances that preventable aspects of these “geriatric giants” are not well addressed and often overlooked. The disabilities of the older adults in mental, physical, and social domains are sometimes misperceived as an unavoidable concern of older age people, it has to be improved. Conditions such as incontinence, intellectual impairment, instability, and immobility are common in older adults and have a greater impact on quality of life [10]. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) process is a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment option that recognizes the medical, functional, and psychosocial limitations of frail older adults to create a strategy to increase the health conditions with aging [11]. CGA needs evaluation in physical, affective, social, cognitive, financial, environmental conditions, and spiritual conditions which have aid in older age people health. CGA is completely based on the systematic evaluation by healthcare professionals to find health problems and gain better health outcomes. The assessment team carries out different components of the process, mostly physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and physiotherapists conduct the assessment of older adults. The 24-hour practicing nurses are expected to play a major role in the caring process of older adults as well as in the assessment practice. Prolonged care and assessment of the individuals help the nurses to give complete care. Such things are possible only by the comprehensive assessment process. To ensure the kills of the nurses, a current study was conducted on the knowledge and attitude of nurses attribute to disseminating and establishing a foundation for fall preventive activities in Tertiary care hospitals. Even though falls among hospitalized patient is a well-recognized topic in both nursing and medical literature, in many developing countries it has not been prioritized for research. Hence, the current study had been devised to find out these lacunae and establish the best care for the patients.

    This cross-sectional study was conducted in Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. A probability random sampling technique was used for selecting the study participants. The researcher's recruited 339 registered nurses who are working in tertiary care hospitals across Chennai aged over 20 years. This study was conducted between February, 2020 to May, 2020. Registered nurses who can read and write English and those willing to give informed consent were only included in the study. Nursing students, trainees, and who were not available during data collection were excluded from participating in the study. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to gather information from concerned participants at a single point in time. Confidentiality of all participants was maintained by assigning a unique respondent ID to each participant. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai (Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute IRB #1/2020/003) and conformed to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Seoul 2008). Informed consent has been obtained from all the participants of the study.

    A modified version of the previously validated standard questionnaire was administered by the investigators comprised of 52 questions/statements on demographic characteristics and information about the fall and its risk factors [12]. The demographics were followed by 3 sections with a set of questions/statements. Section-1 incorporated 16 simple questions, to assess the knowledge of falls by selecting correct and incorrect options. Section-2 embraced 13 positive and negative statements on 5 points Likert scale, the respondents have to record their responses on the 5 points Likert scale ranging from: Strongly agree (SA), Agree (A), Unsure (U), Disagree (D), Strongly Disagree (SD) for obtaining information on the attitude of fall and section-3 encompassed risk factor category question with the list of 16 risk factors where the respondent has to select related /unrelated option. The reliability of this tool was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, wherein α = 0.75.

    The sample size (n) has been arrived at 313, based on the hypothesis testing for single proportion with 2 sided with the population proportion of 0.82, sample proportion of 0.757, power (%) of 80, and alpha error (%) of 5.

    Each statement/question was numerically coded to obtain a score for knowledge and attitude of falls and awareness of fall risk factors. All the categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Descriptive analysis was performed using univariate statistics to report the Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) for the continuous variable and frequency distributions for the categorical variables. Correlation, non-parametric tests of Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test were performed to compare differences in the variables. All reported statistically significant differences were calculated at the 95% confidence level. Spearman's rho test measured the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The Chi-square test was used to assess the association between categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 17) for Microsoft Windows, SPSS Inc. USA.

    Of the 439 participants who were intended to receive survey questionnaires, 339 participants submitted completed questionnaires: a response rate of 75% leaving 339 valid for analysis. Table 1 depicted the demographic characteristics of the nurses. Out of the participants (n = 339) are Female (84.1%) and Male (15.9%). Most of the nurses participated in the study (36.3%) where their professional experience is less than 6 months. 21% of the respondent have experienced patients' that have sustained falls whereas (56.3%) have not experienced previous patient fall. The majority of the respondent (71.7%) have received fall prevention education. However, only (18.3%) were extremely familiar with fall prevention activities (Table 2).

    Considering the overall level of knowledge of the 339 participants, 26.8% (n = 91) of individuals had inadequate knowledge, 57.5% (n = 193) had moderately adequate knowledge, and 15.6% (n = 53) had adequate knowledge of falls (Figure 1). The average mean knowledge of the study participants was 10.05 ± 2.21 (Table 3). Correlation between level of knowledge and participants' years of experience in nursing alone showed a statistically significant relationship at P = 0.01 among all the selected demographic variables. (Table 4) Similarly, only years of experience in nursing have a statistically significant association (P = 0.01) with the level of knowledge on falls (Table 5).

    The statements concerned with diseases condition and medications related to falls as expressed by the participants represented the lowest of all knowledge scores were: 42% for “Taking medicine for diabetics is not related to falling” and “Intravenous therapy or intravenous access has a risk for fall”. 46% for “Depression is not related to falling and 47.2% for “Taking medicines for blood pressure is not related to falling” (Table 6).

    In this present study, 2% (n = 6) had unfavorable attitude, 42.2% (n = 143) had moderately favorable attitude and 57.2% had favorable attitude towards fall (Figure 1). 49.69 ± 5.746 was the average mean attitude of the study participants (Table 5). The participants' attitudes towards falls had a statistically significant relationship at P = 0.001 with age, education, and experience in nursing and previous fall experience at P = 0.05 (Table 6). There were statistically significant associations between an attitude toward falls with age (0.05), gender (P = 0.001), educational qualification (P < 0.001), and experience in nursing (P = 0.001) (Table 5).

    The lowest mean score for the statements on an attitude of fall was: 2.58 ± 1.24 for the statement “hospital environment is safe for fall”. 2.66 ± 1.26 for “fall is unavoidable”. Majority of the participants expressed their favorable attitude toward the need for fall preventive education (Table 7).

    The participants level of awareness on fall risk factors were 38.3% (n = 130) adequate, 52.2% (n = 177) moderately adequate and 9.4% (n = 32) inadequate (Figure 1). The average mean value was 11.48 ± 2.165 (Table 3). The correlation between fall knowledge, an attitude toward fall, and awareness of fall risk factors were highly significant at P = 0.0001 with 95% CI (Table 3).

    Table 1.  Demographic characteristics of the nurses included in the study (n = 339).
    Demographics Frequency Percentage (%)
    Age
    ≤20 years 47 13.9
    21–25 years 174 51.3
    26–30 years 56 16.5
    30 years 62 18.3
    Gender
    Female 285 84.1
    Male 54 15.9
    Educational qualification
    Diploma in nursing & midwifery 87 25.7
    Post basic bachelor of science in nursing 3 0.9
    Bachelor of science in nursing 205 60.5
    Master of science in nursing 44 13.0
    Experience in nursing
    Less than 6 months 123 36.3
    6 months to 2 years 75 22.1
    2–6 years 82 24.2
    7–10 years 19 5.6
    More than 10 years 40 11.8
    Previous patient fall experience
    Yes 148 43.7
    No 191 56.3
    Received fall prevention education
    Yes 243 71.7
    No 96 28.3
    Fall prevention activity
    Extremely familiar 62 18.3
    Very familiar 103 30.4
    Somewhat familiar 126 37.2
    Not so familiar 32 9.4
    Not at all familiar 16 4.7

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Frequency and Percentage of level of awareness on fall risk factors among the nurses (n = 339).
    Risk factor Category n Percentage (%)
    Gender Related 182 53.7
    Unrelated 157 46.3
    Educational level Related 138 40.7
    Unrelated 201 59.3
    Hearing Related 247 72.9
    Unrelated 92 27.1
    Depression Related 254 74.9
    Unrelated 85 25.1
    Taking medicine Related 290 85.5
    Unrelated 49 14.5
    Urinary incontinence Related 205 60.5
    Unrelated 134 39.5
    Number of chronic disease Related 258 76.1
    Unrelated 81 23.9
    Cognitive impairment Related 283 83.5
    Unrelated 56 16.5
    Insomnia Related 294 86.7
    Unrelated 45 13.3
    Age Related 302 89.1
    Unrelated 37 10.9
    Use of assistive device Related 268 79.1
    Unrelated 71 20.9
    Anxiety for fall Related 276 81.4
    Unrelated 63 18.6
    Sight Related 291 85.8
    Unrelated 48 14.2
    Walking disorder Related 313 92.3
    Unrelated 26 7.7
    Activities of daily living Related 262 77.3
    Unrelated 77 22.7
    Dizziness Related 306 90.3
    Unrelated 33 9.7

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Correlation between knowledge, attitudes toward falls, and awareness of fall risk factors among nurses (n = 339).
    Variables Mean Standard deviation (SD) Spearman's rho & P-value, Sig.
    Knowledge 10.05 2.22 r = 0.206
    P = 0.001
    Attitude 49.7 5.75
    Knowledge 10.05 2.22 r = 0.252
    P = 0.001
    Awareness on fall risk factors 11.48 2.16
    Attitude 49.7 5.75 r = 0.214
    P = 0.001
    Awareness on fall risk factors 11.48 2.16

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Correlation of different characteristic variables with knowledge and attitude of fall.
    Variables Knowledge on Fall
    Attitude on Fall
    n Mean rank Kruskal-Wallis test n Mean rank Kruskal-Wallis test
    Age ≤20 years 47 155.93 H = 7.010
    d.f = 3
    P = 0.072
    N.S
    47 143.17 H = 23.831
    d.f = 3
    P = 0.00*
    21–25 years 174 161.02 174 157.05
    26–30 years 56 191.46 56 175.93
    >30 years 62 186.48 62 221.31
    Gender Female 285 170.28 Z = 0.124
    P = 0.901
    N.S
    285 174.42 Z = 1.911
    P = 0.056
    N.S
    Male 54 168.50 54 146.67
    Educational qualification Diploma in nursing and midwifery 87 169.11 H = 0.052
    d.f = 3
    P = 0.997
    N.S
    87 125.41 H = 37.086
    d.f = 3
    P = 0.001*
    Post basic bachelor of science in nursing 3 159.00 3 174.33
    Bachelor of science in nursing 205 170.33 205 175.27
    Master of science in nursing 44 170.95 44 233.32
    Experience in nursing Less than 6 months 123 165.21 H = 7.113
    d.f = 4
    P = 0.130
    N.S
    123 153.56 H = 36.388
    d.f = 4
    P = 0.001*
    6 months to 2 years 75 153.81 75 163.08
    2–6 years 82 175.11 82 151.40
    7–10 years 19 212.21 19 228.61
    More than 10 years 40 184.56 40 243.83
    Previous fall experience Yes 148 170.50 Z = 0.083
    P = 0.934
    N.S
    148 152.44 Z = 2.909
    P = 0.004*
    No 191 169.62 191 183.61
    Received fall prevention education Yes 243 176.62 Z = 1.997
    P = 0.046*
    243 176.14 Z = 1.839
    P = 0.066
    N.S
    No 96 153.26 96 154.45
    Fall prevention activity Extremely familiar 62 149.93 H = 7.091
    d.f = 4
    P = 0.131
    N.S
    62 162.38 H = 6.042
    d.f = 4
    P = 0.196
    N.S
    Very familiar 103 183.88 103 185.34
    Somewhat familiar 126 175.00 126 170.72
    Not so familiar 32 145.84 32 145.84
    Not at all familiar 16 167.38 16 143.44

    Note: H: Kruskal–Wallis test; Z: Mann-Whitney test; P < 0.05 is considered as statistically significant; N.S: Not significant; d.f: degrees of freedom; * indicates statistically significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Association of demographic variables with the level of knowledge and level of attitude among participants enclosed in this study.
    Demographics Level of knowledge on Fall
    Level of attitude on Fall
    Inadequate Moderately adequate Adequate Chi-Square test, P-value & Sig. Unfavorable Moderately favorable Favorable Chi-Square test, P-value & Sig.
    Age ≤20 years 15 (31.9%) 26 (55.3%) 6 (12.8%) χ2 = 6.695
    d.f = 6
    P = 0.350
    N.S
    0 (0.0%) 25 (53.2%) 22 (46.8%) χ2 = 14.391
    d.f = 6
    P = 0.026*
    21–25 years 50 (28.7%) 103 (59.2%) 21 (12.1%) 2 (1.1%) 81 (46.6%) 91 (52.3%)
    26–30 years 12 (21.4%) 32 (57.1%) 12 (21.4%) 0 (0.0%) 22 (39.3%) 34 (60.7%)
    >30 years 14 (22.6%) 34 (54.8%) 14 (22.6%) 0 (0.0%) 15 (24.2%) 47 (75.8%)
    Gender Female 78 (27.4%) 161 (56.5%) 46 (16.1%) χ2 = 0.807
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.668
    N.S
    0 (0.0%) 115 (40.4%) 170 (59.6%) χ2 = 13.813
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.001*
    Male 13 (24.1%) 34 (63.0%) 7 (13.0%) 2 (3.7%) 28 (51.9%) 24 (44.4%)
    Educational qualification Diploma in nursing and midwifery 19 (21.8%) 56 (64.4%) 12 (13.8%) χ2 = 3.319
    d.f = 6
    P = 0.768
    N.S
    1 (1.1%) 57 (65.5%) 29 (33.3%) χ2 = 33.282
    d.f = 6
    P = 0.001*
    Post basic bachelor of science in nursing 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
    Bachelor of science in nursing 60 (29.3%) 111 (54.1%) 34 (16.6%) 1 (0.5%) 77 (37.6%) 127 (62.0%)
    Master of science in nursing 11 (25.0%) 26 (59.1%) 7 (15.9%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (18.2%) 36 (81.8%)
    Experience in nursing Less than 6 months 31 (25.0%) 78 (63.4%) 14 (11.4%) χ2 = 20.814
    d.f = 8
    P = 0.008*
    0 (0.0%) 61 (49.6%) 62 (50.4%) χ2 = 31.448
    d.f = 8
    P = 0.001*
    6 months to 2 years 21 (28.0%) 47 (62.7%) 7 (9.3%) 2 (2.7%) 30 (40.0%) 43 (57.3%)
    2–6 years 28 (34.1%) 35 (42.7%) 19 (23.2%) 0 (0.0%) 43 (52.4%) 39 (47.6%)
    7–10 years 4 (21.1%) 8 (42.1%) 7 (36.8%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (21.1%) 15 (78.9%)
    More than 10 years 7 (17.5%) 27 (67.5%) 6 (15.0%) 0 (0.0%) 5 (12.5%) 35 (87.5%)
    Previous patient fall experience Yes 38 (25.7%) 88 (59.5%) 22 (14.9%) χ2 = 0.404
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.817
    N.S
    1 (0.7%) 73 (49.3%) 74 (50.0%) χ2 = 5.606
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.061
    N.S
    No 53 (27.7%) 107 (56.0%) 31 (16.2%) 1 (0.5%) 70 (36.6%) 120 (62.8%)
    Received fall prevention education Yes 63 (25.9%) 136 (56.0%) 44 (18.1%) χ2 = 3.986
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.136
    N.S
    1 (0.4%) 97 (39.9%) 145 (59.7%) χ2 = 2.402
    d.f = 2
    P = 0.301
    N.S
    No 28 (29.2%) 59 (61.5%) 9 (9.4%) 1 (1.0%) 46 (47.9%) 49 (51.0%)
    Fall prevention activity Extremely familiar 18 (29.0%) 38 (61.3%) 6 (9.7%) χ2 = 15.086
    d.f = 8
    P = 0.057
    N.S
    0 (0.0%) 31 (50.0%) 31 (50.0%) χ2 = 11.478
    d.f = 8
    P = 0.176
    N.S
    Very familiar 27 (26.2%) 55 (53.4%) 21 (20.4%) 0 (0.0%) 35 (34.0%) 68 (66.0%)
    Somewhat familiar 31 (24.6%) 71 (56.3%) 24 (19.0%) 1 (0.8%) 52 (41.3%) 73 (57.9%)
    Not so familiar 13 (40.6%) 17 (53.1%) 2 (6.3%) 1 (3.1%) 17 (53.1%) 14 (43.8%)
    Not at all familiar 2 (12.5%) 14 (87.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (50.0%) 8 (50.0%)

    Note: P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant; NS: Not significant; d.f: degrees of freedom; * indicates statistically significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6.  Statements that evaluate participant's knowledge of falls in this study (n = 339).
    Items Mean Standard deviation
    The recurrence rate is high among anyone who has already experienced a fall. 0.67 0.472
    Falls occur most frequently in safety incidents in hospitals. 0.58 0.495
    Falls increase an elderly persons' death rate. 0.77 0.420
    Elderly hip fractures occur from falls. 0.89 0.312
    Sliding is not falling. 0.55 0.499
    The more medicine you take, the higher your fall risk. 0.58 0.494
    The more diseases you have, the higher your fall risk. 0.66 0.473
    Depression is not related to falls. 0.46 0.499
    Someone who has a visual impairment has a higher risk for falls. 0.91 0.280
    Being numb in the limbs is not related to falls. 0.57 0.496
    Dysuria is a risk factor for falls. 0.70 0.458
    Taking medicine for diabetes is not related to falls. 0.42 0.495
    Taking medicine for blood pressure is not related to falls. 0.47 0.500
    Hearing-impaired is not related to falls. 0.53 0.500
    Falls occur more when getting up from and down on beds in hospitals. 0.86 0.343
    IV therapy or IV access has a risk for fall. 0.42 0.495

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 7.  Statements that evaluate the attitude of falls among nurses enclosed in the study (n = 339).
    Items Mean Standard deviation
    I am concerned about patient falls. 4.39 0.726
    I think falls among patients are unavoidable. 2.66 1.268
    I think nurses are responsible for patients' falls. 3.75 1.235
    Fall prevention is a higher priority for intervention. 4.35 0.794
    I have a concern about nursing interventions for fall prevention. 4.29 0.872
    Fall prevention interventions should be conducted actively. 4.37 0.725
    A patients' fall risk level should be inspected when hospitalized. 4.32 0.900
    Falls preventive education is necessary. 4.56 0.741
    Falls occur because of patients. 2.59 1.082
    I will help immediately if someone asks for help when they move. 4.53 0.750
    Physical injury is not severe even if a fall happens. 3.07 1.218
    The hospital environment is safe for falls. 2.58 1.241
    I feel guilty if my patient falls. 4.21 0.908

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  Overall percentage distribution of level of knowledge & attitude on fall and awareness of fall risk factors.

    Fall in hospitalized patients is almost always preventable [13],[14]. Nurses with adequate knowledge and awareness of falls and their risk factors are anticipated to bring about be a significant reduction in the prevalence of fall occurrence and a positive influence on falls among hospitalized patients [15]. In our present study, 43.7% of nurses had previous patient fall experience which is similar to that reported by various studies [16],[17]. This is much higher than that reported by Kim et al. [18]. These differences may be due to the nature of hospital infrastructure, years of nursing training programs, and differences in patient profiles.

    Even though the majority of the participants (71.7%) reported “received fall prevention education”, only 15.6% had an adequate level of knowledge which was lower when compared with the study reported by Kim et al. [18], where 85.7% of nurses had a high level of knowledge. Similar to our study, Laing et al. [19] reported a lower level of knowledge among health workers about falls. In our study majority of the nurses had working experience of fewer than 2 years hence low level of knowledge regarding a complex multifactorial event like a fall can be attributed.

    In the assessment of knowledge session of the questionnaire statements about diseases condition, treatment-related, and medications related to falls as expressed by the participants represented the lowest of all scores similar to previous studies [18],[19]. This could be attributed to not incorporating multidisciplinary evidenced-based training on falls with a new perspective. In India, it is a harsh reality that many hospitals neither have standard policies and procedures nor training programs on falls and their prevention. Laing et al. [19] revealed that the knowledge and skills of nurses related to falls and their prevention were improved after the training confirming the need for evidence-based training. Hence, the introduction of a care bundle approach frequent in-services and focus groups may enhance nurses learning and improve clinical outcomes.

    This study revealed majority 57.2% had a favorable attitude towards falls which supports the study by Kim CG et al. [17] where the attitude level of nurses was 77.2% positive toward falls. This may be due to the social and cultural empathy incorporated in training. Contradictory results have been shown in various other studies [16],[17],[20]. This may be due to the difference in nature of study participants (students, workers). However, the potential gaps in awareness of fall risk factors may be addressed by developing nurse-sensitive, context-specific fall-prevention clinical guidelines for practice in India.

    In our study, 52.2% had moderately adequate awareness of fall risk factors. In contrast, 60% of health care professionals including nurses had little or some awareness of fall risk factors in a study [21],[22]. Therefore, an onsite training program on awareness of fall risk factors designed for nurses is crucial and need of the hour to help them identify the most important risk factors for falls and translate the knowledge into practice. The majority of the participants (66.1%) expressed a need for fall preventive education in this study this was achieved through developing a multifactorial, multidisciplinary fall preventive educational program and introducing a bundle approach to falls.

    The years of experience in nursing showed both a strong association and a positive relationship with the level of knowledge. This implies that the knowledge improves as they gain more working experience because they obtain more information and hands-on experience. The attitude of nurses towards falls had strong associations with age, gender, educational qualification, and experience in nursing. This implies that as their experience in nursing care increases with education and patient care the more positive attitude they develop toward falls and their preventive measure.

    Interestingly, our study also showed a strong correlation between knowledge, attitude, and awareness of fall preventive measures with each other. This is supported by several studies as well [17][19],[23]. This shows that continued medical education and training of nurses are required to bring about an overall change in fall incidents in hospitalized patients.

    This study was conducted with certain limitations. The study participants were selected based on the probability random sampling technique. Registered nurses who are able to read and write English and those willing to give informed consent were only included in the study.

    In our study, it is evident that there is a void that has to be filled to improve the knowledge, attitude, and awareness of falls and their risk factors. There is a need for extensive education and holistic, multi factorial, and interdisciplinary training program to be undertaken through various health care organizations including governmental and non-governmental organizations regarding falls and risk factors of falls to reduce fall occurrence thereby ensuring patient safety.


    Acknowledgments



    We are thankful to Dr. S. Porchelvan, MSc, MBA, PGDCA, PhD, Professor in Biostatistics for assisting with the statistical analyses.

    Availability of data and material



    The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

    Authors' contributions



    Conceptualisation: SKM; Methodology: Investigation: KMJ and SKM; KMJ, DR, SM, PS, YS, VPV: contributed to data curation, validation, visualization; PC, RGJM, SRTK, VPV: contributed to formal analysis, validation, visualization; KMJ and SKM: contributed to writing the Original Draft of the Manuscript; MK and SKM: Contributed to Writing–Review and Editing of the Manuscript; SKM: Supervision and Project Administration; KMJ, DR, SM, PS, PC, RGJM, YS, SRTK, VPV, MK & SKM: All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the submitted manuscript.

    Funding



    This research received no external funding.

    Conflicts of interests



    All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Lamb SE, Jørstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, et al. (2005) Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 53: 1618-1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53455.x
    [2] World Health OrganizationThe global burden of disease: 2004 update (‎2008). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43942
    [3] Healey F, Darowski A (2012) Older patients and falls in hospital. Clin Risk 18: 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1258/cr.2012.012020
    [4] Healey FM (2011) The prevention of patient falls in healthcare settings, with particular emphasis on the effect of bedrail use on falls and injury as part of multi-faceted interventions. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University .
    [5] Kumar A, Srivastava DK, Verma A, et al. (2013) The problems of fall, risk factors and their management among geriatric population in India. Indian J Community Health 25: 89-94.
    [6] Dsouza SA, Rajashekar B, Dsouza HS, et al. (2014) Falls in Indian older adults: a barrier to active ageing. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 9: 33-40.
    [7] Williams JS, Kowal P, Hestekin H, et al. (2015) Prevalence, risk factors and disability associated with fall-related injury in older adults in low- and middle-incomecountries: results from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Med 13: 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0390-8
    [8] World Health OrganizationAgeing, Life Course Unit. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age (2008). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563536
    [9] Mitchell-Fearon K, James K, Waldron N, et al. (2014) Falls among community-dwelling older adults in Jamaica. SAGE Open 4: 2158244014564351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564351
    [10] Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, et al. (2007) Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc 55: 780-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x
    [11] Smith G, Kydd A (2016) Editorial: getting care of older people right. The need for appropriate frailty assessment. J Clin Nurs 26: 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13618
    [12] Tzeng HM, Yin CY (2013) Frequently observed risk factors for fall-related injuries and effective preventive interventions: a multihospital survey of nurses' perceptions. J Nurs Care Qual 28: 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182780037
    [13] Campbell B (2016) Patient falls: preventable, not inevitable. Nurs Made Incred Easy 14: 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NME.0000475168.08103.37
    [14] Shojania KG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2015) Temporal trends in patient safety in the Netherlands: reductions in preventable adverse events or the end of adverse events as a useful metric?. BMJ Qual Saf 24: 541-544. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004461
    [15] Cangany M, Back D, Hamilton-Kelly T, et al. (2015) Bedside nurses leading the way for falls prevention: an evidence-based approach. Crit Care Nurse 35: 82-84. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2015414
    [16] Seo OI (2008) Influence of knowledge and attitude on behaviors of falls prevention activities in patient among university hospital nurse. Unpublished master's thesis, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul .
    [17] Kim CG (2011) Nurses' knowledge and attitude toward fall in hospitalized patients. J Ind Sci Res 28: 275-281.
    [18] Kim MH, Jeon HW, Chon MY (2015) Study on the knowledge and attitudes of falls and awareness of fall risk factors among nursing students. Indian J Sci Technol 8: 74. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/57593
    [19] Laing SS, Silver IF, York S, et al. (2011) Fall prevention knowledge, attitude, and practices of community stakeholders and older adults. J Aging Res 2011. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/395357
    [20] Choi BH (2011) The nursing student's attitude and preventive activities on inpatients falls. Unpublished master's thesis, Keimyung University .
    [21] Asiri F, ALMohiza MA, Faia Aseeri M, et al. (2018) Fall prevention knowledge and practice patterns among home healthcare professionals in southern Saudi Arabia: an observational study. J Int Med Res 46: 5062-5073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518789816
    [22] Gutta S, Joseph A, Chakraborty A, et al. (2013) Study on the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding prevention of recurrent falls in the elderly. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 9: 32-38. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-0933238
    [23] Kalu ME, Vlachantoni A, Norman KE (2019) Knowledge about risk factors for falls and practice about fall prevention in older adults among physiotherapists in Nigeria. Physiother Res Int 24: e1742. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1742
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Neah Albasha, Ruth McCullagh, Nicola Cornally, Suzanne Timmons, Staff knowledge, attitudes and confidence levels for fall preventions in older person long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional study, 2023, 23, 1471-2318, 10.1186/s12877-023-04323-0
    2. Saeed Asiri, Ali Kerari, Factors Influencing Nursing Interns' Engagement in Fall Prevention Activities in Saudi Arabia, 2025, 12, 2054-1058, 10.1002/nop2.70131
    3. Esra Özbudak Arıca, Zeliha Koç, Investigating nurses’ attitudes towards the prevention of falls: A mixed-method study, 2025, 62, 01974572, 62, 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.01.008
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5797) PDF downloads(480) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog