Research article

Nutritional status of Moroccan pregnant women and the birth weight of their newborn: a case-control study in the province of El Jadida

  • Received: 30 June 2021 Accepted: 01 September 2021 Published: 17 September 2021
  • Background 

    Maternal malnutrition is a global concern whose consequences for newborns are intrauterine growth retardation, fetal hypotrophy and exposure to risks of pathologies in adulthood.

    Objective 

    The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diet quality and nutritional status of pregnant women at the time of childbirth while assessing their newborn's weight at birth.

    Materials and methods 

    The study involved 400 parturient, divided into two groups of 200 each, the controls who have just given birth to newborns of normal weight and the cases who have just given birth to babies of low birth weight (LBW). Information on food intakes and dietary habits were collected using questionnaires and anthropometric parameters were measured.

    Results 

    The mean body mass index (BMI) of the cases was 25.93 ± 2.64 kg/m2 vs. 28.25 ± 2.75 kg/m2 in the controls. The dietary diversity and variety scores were higher in the controls than in the cases. Indeed means were 6.87 ± 1.30 vs. 8.88 ± 1.35 food groups for the diversity scores and 11.77 ± 1.57 vs. 15.90 ± 2.09 food items for the variety scores in the cases and the controls respectively. The average daily intakes of folates, calcium, iron and zinc were lower than the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) for both groups. The daily calcium intake represents only 1/5th of the RDI for the cases and 1/3 for the controls. Average dietary iron intake was insufficient at only 49% of the daily requirement for cases vs. 66.88% for controls while folates accounts for 64.33% of the RDA for the cases.

    Conclusion 

    Data from this study shows that the diets of women who have given birth to low birth weight infants are poorly diversified, poorly varied, and poor in certain nutrients essential for a successful pregnancy and childbirth.

    Citation: Houda Elfane, Sanaa El-Jamal, Mohamed Mziwira, Imane Barakat, Mohammed Elayachi, Rekia Belahsen. Nutritional status of Moroccan pregnant women and the birth weight of their newborn: a case-control study in the province of El Jadida[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(3): 237-251. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021020

    Related Papers:

    [1] Sylvia Kirchengast, Beda Hartmann . Maternal prepregnancy nutritional status influences newborn size and mode of delivery. AIMS Medical Science, 2018, 5(1): 53-66. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2018.1.53
    [2] Ahlam Al-Zahrani, Shorooq Al-Marwani . The effectiveness of an educational session about folic acid on pregnant women's knowledge in Yanbu City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(3): 394-413. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022019
    [3] Shiva Alizadeh, Hedyeh Riazi, Hamid Alavi Majd, Giti Ozgoli . Sexual health and its related factors among Iranian pregnant women: A review study. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(4): 296-317. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.4.296
    [4] Sima Fallah Arzpeyma, Pooya Bahari Khorram, Maryam Asgharnia, Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri . Investigating the relationship between ultrasound measured optic nerve sheath diameter and preeclampsia. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(3): 250-259. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.3.250
    [5] Sanaa El-Jamal, Mohamed Mziwira, Houda Elfane, Khadija Sahel, Imane Barakat, Adil Kalili, Kaoutar Naciri, Nadia Mahri, Rachida Moustakim, Rachida El Ouafi, Loubna Arkoubi Idrissi, Rekia Belahsen . Association between food insecurity and obesity in an agricultural community of women from El Jadida, Morocco. AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(3): 175-188. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021016
    [6] Sanaa El–Jamal, Houda Elfane, Imane Barakat, Khadija Sahel, Mohamed Mziwira, Aziz Fassouane, Rekia Belahsen . Association of socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics with the management and glycemic control in type 1 diabetic children from the province of El Jadida (Morocco). AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(2): 87-104. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021010
    [7] Ayşegül Çelik, Belgüzar Kara . The relationship between the stroke survivors’ functional status and their informal caregivers’ burden and quality of life. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(1): 115-127. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.1.115
    [8] Dhruba Prasad Paul, Jayanta Ray, Sharmistha Sarkar . Study of outcome of Intrauterine Contraceptive device (CuT-380A) insertion immediately after vaginal delivery. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(4): 328-336. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020022
    [9] Snigdha Misra, Yang Wai Yew, Tan Seok Shin . Maternal dietary patterns, diet quality and micronutrient status in gestational diabetes mellitus across different economies: A review. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(1): 76-114. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.1.76
    [10] Swapna B Reddy, Matthew J Speer, Jessica Todsen, Subhakar Mutyala, Niloy Jewel L Samadder, Giovanna GG Moreno, Yerronda L Lewis, Farhia M Omar, Shambhavi Mishra, Sarah B Umar . Moving the needle forward in health disparities: An education initiative. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(2): 170-180. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024014
  • Background 

    Maternal malnutrition is a global concern whose consequences for newborns are intrauterine growth retardation, fetal hypotrophy and exposure to risks of pathologies in adulthood.

    Objective 

    The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diet quality and nutritional status of pregnant women at the time of childbirth while assessing their newborn's weight at birth.

    Materials and methods 

    The study involved 400 parturient, divided into two groups of 200 each, the controls who have just given birth to newborns of normal weight and the cases who have just given birth to babies of low birth weight (LBW). Information on food intakes and dietary habits were collected using questionnaires and anthropometric parameters were measured.

    Results 

    The mean body mass index (BMI) of the cases was 25.93 ± 2.64 kg/m2 vs. 28.25 ± 2.75 kg/m2 in the controls. The dietary diversity and variety scores were higher in the controls than in the cases. Indeed means were 6.87 ± 1.30 vs. 8.88 ± 1.35 food groups for the diversity scores and 11.77 ± 1.57 vs. 15.90 ± 2.09 food items for the variety scores in the cases and the controls respectively. The average daily intakes of folates, calcium, iron and zinc were lower than the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) for both groups. The daily calcium intake represents only 1/5th of the RDI for the cases and 1/3 for the controls. Average dietary iron intake was insufficient at only 49% of the daily requirement for cases vs. 66.88% for controls while folates accounts for 64.33% of the RDA for the cases.

    Conclusion 

    Data from this study shows that the diets of women who have given birth to low birth weight infants are poorly diversified, poorly varied, and poor in certain nutrients essential for a successful pregnancy and childbirth.



    During pregnancy, women need sufficient energy and nutritional intakes to compensate for the physiological changes associated with gestation. Diet is an important factor for the successful course of gestation and the growth of the fetus. Malnutrition during gestation can lead to intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and/or fetal hypotrophy, and expose children with low birth weight (LBW) to greater risk of diseases in adulthood [1].

    According to the World Health Organization (WHO), LBW is defined as any newborn weight strictly less than 2500 grams regardless of the term of pregnancy [2]. According to the literature, maternal under nutrition is the main driver of LBW, reflected in poor nutritional status at conception [3]. An infant's birth weight is indicative of its intrauterine environment and nutrition, but may also be indicative of the mother's health and nutrition status during pregnancy [4].

    The transition from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has placed women's health and well-being at the center of the Moroccan agenda. These goals include, among others, the improvement of maternal health byreducing the maternal mortality rate by 75% [5]. It is therefore essential that women have a high quality diet, before conception and during pregnancy, in order to reduce the prevalence of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. A fortiori, a diet contributing to the prevention of LBW, must meet criteria of diversity and balance in terms of quantity, quality, and nutritional content. Dietary diversity remains an essential component for a qualitative measurement of food consumption. It does not evoke a new concept, but its practice remains recent, at least in developing countries [6]. Dietary diversity can be assessed by simple scoresdefined by the number of foods or of food groups, consumed over a period. It is onemethod of approaching the nutritional adequacy of the diet [7].

    The objective of this study was therefore to assess and compare the quality diversity of dietary intake between two groups of Moroccan pregnant women at the time of childbirth while evaluating their newborn weight at birth. A semi-quantitative recall method of food consumption based on the food frequency during a usual week before pregnancy was used in order to record the usual consumption and build the food variety and diversity scores. A 24 hour recall was also used to assess the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the diet.

    The investigation obtained the approval of the Moroccan Ministry of Health regional directorate. Participation in the survey was subject to a free and informed written consent of the participants and their newborns. After receiving a detailed explanation of the conduct and conditions of the survey, the female respondents were free to refuse or withdraw from the survey at any time.

    The study took place in the maternity ward of the provincial hospital of El Jadida province of Morocco, over a period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. This hospital represents a 2 nd level public health structure with a high influx of the rural population.

    This cross-sectional case-control study included 400 pregnant women who are in labor and who attended the maternity ward for childbirth whatever the gestational age. Sampling is done by reasoned choice and the women were divided into two groups:

    • A control group of 200 women defined as parturient who have just given birth and who gave birth to newborns of normal weight between 2600 and 4000 g [8].
    • A group of cases numbering 200 women defined as parturient who have just given birth tolow-weight newborns below 2500 g [1].

    All pregnant women childbearing age that gave birth to live newborns were included in this study. Twin and multiple pregnancies, stillbirths and fetal deaths in utero were excluded from the study.

    Information was collected by means of an established questionnaire, which collected information on socio-demographic and economic factors, namely: age, origin, level of education, profession, family type and the level of monthly income.

    Dietary data are collected by the 24-hour dietary recall technique to list all foods ingested and the macronutrient and micronutrient intake of parturient was determined using the BILNUT software. This 24-hour dietary recall was performed one day before childbirth so that it is a usual day for pregnant women and to avoid warning signs of childbirth such as nausea and vomiting which may influence the results. Each pregnant woman is asked to describe precisely everything she has consumed (drunk and eaten) during the previous 24 hours, from rising the night before until the same time on the day of the survey. The respondent is also asked to quantify the foods described, with her own measures (household measures). The nutrient content of the standard portions is obtained from the Food Table computerized BILNUT. The values obtained were then compared with the nutritional intakes of reference [9]. A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was also completed in the participants to this study to transcribe their food consumption habits. The dietary diversity score was assessed by counting the number of food groups that were the source of food items consumed by each woman in a typical week before pregnancy. The food frequency was used for more precision in the calculation of the dietary diversity scores. this food frequency is made up of two parts: one closed list of foods and a section where consumption frequencies can be indicated (for example, several times a day, 3 to 4 times a week, 1 to 2 times a week, 1 to 2 times a month ...) and a section with more detailed questions about the size the portion consumed and its composition, or the method of preparation of the dishes (frying, cooking or in the oven...).

    Before calculating DDS, the food groups are defined considering the eating habits and practices of the study population. In the present study the following 12 food groups: cereals, vegetables, legumes, fruits, fish, sugar and derivatives, meat and derivatives, eggs, milk/dairy products, oleaginous products, condiments and sugary drinks are used to get as close as possible to the food composition table for use in Africa proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) [10].

    The DDS is then calculated by simply counting the food groups to which belonged the foods items a woman consumed in a typical week before childbirth [11]. The number of food groups consumed reflects the degree of diversity in the food intake.

    The Food Variety score (FVS) is defined by the number of different foods consumed over a given period of time: a cumulative variety score represents the number of foods consumed in one or more days. The occurrences of consumption as well as the quantities ingested are not taken into account. The FVS estimates the number of foods/products consumed (with a consumption threshold of at least 0.1 g) by a household or a person during the last 24, 48 hours or 3 days [12],[13]. In other words, the consumption of a mixture of foods belonging to different groups (cereals, fruits, dairy products, etc.) and of a mixture within each group: bread, rice, couscous, etc. for the cereals group, for example [14]. This is the number of different foods consumed by the person (identified from a list of 242 items in our study).

    Both DDS and FVS scores correctly reflect the quality of the diet in terms of micronutrient coverage [15].

    Anthropometric measurements were performed following procedures recommended by the WHO. Pregnant women were weighed before delivery on electronic scales with an accuracy of 100 grams. The height was measured to the nearest millimeter using a wall chart.

    Body mass index (BMI) was obtained by dividing an individual's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. A BMI value strictly less than 18.5 kilograms (kg)/square meter (m2) represents under weight, normal weight is 18.5 to <25 kg/m2, overweight 25 to <30 kg/m2 and obese for a BMI greater or equal than 30 kg/m2 [16].

    Statistical analysis of data was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 for Windows. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the comparison of several means tested against each other using Tukey's test. Thus, the analyzed results are expressed as unadjusted means ± Standard Deviation or as adjusted means ± Standard error. Student's test was used for independent samples.

    Table 1 presents the socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study population. The age of the sample of women studied is on average 25.95 ± 3.79. The distribution by age group shows a similarity in the distribution of cases and controls with a predominance of the age group ≥20; 30≥ representing respective rates of 61% for cases and; 67% for the controls of. Depending on the area of residence, the majority of participants in the control group (84%) and the case group (77.5%) come from rural areas. In addition, almost half of the controls (48%) and the majority of cases (61%) are illiterate. The data also show that the highest levels of education affect only 6% of female controls against 1.5% of cases. The analysis also revealed a high proportion of 60.5% of the parturient controls and 50% of the cases living in extended families and almost all of the controls (92.5%) and cases (86%) are professionally inactive. Otherwise, the anthropometric parameters show that, the control women surveyed had on average a height of approximately 1.63 ± 0.05 m, a weight of 75.25 ± 8.40 kg and a build estimated by the body mass index rather satisfactory (mean BMI = 28.25 ± 2.75kg/m2) with high prevalence of overweight (48.5%) and obesity (44%). The estimation of these parameters in the cases shows that on average the height was 1.60 ± 0.04 m, the weight was 67.26 ± 8.06 kg and the mean BMI of the cases was 25.93 ± 2.64 kg/m2. According to the BMI of this latter group of parturient, 35.5% were described as “normal”, 57% overweight and only 7% of cases were obese.

    Table 2 shows that overall the pregnant women studied had on average nutritional intakes that exceeded the recommended daily values [17] for energy, protein, vitamin C, vitamin E, magnesium and phosphorus in both cases and controls. These average contributions of cases and controls are respectively 2756 Kcal vs. 2915 Kcal for energy; 90.30 mg/d vs. 101.40 mg/d for proteins; 96 mg/d vs. 112 mg/d for vitamin C; 18.84 mg/d vs. 21.22 mg/d for vitamin E; 490 mg/d vs. 521.3 mg/d for magnesium and 1545.16 mg/d vs. 1721.02 mg/d for phosphorus intake. However, insufficient intakes are recorded in calcium and iron which are lower than the recommended daily intakes which do not exceed 28% for calcium and 58% for iron in the total population. Likewise, insufficient coverage of daily intake of zinc, vitamin B1 and folates and below recommendations was recorded in both cases and controls. These intakes were 9.11 mg/d vs. 10.65 mg/d for zinc; 1.02 mg/day vs. 1.45 mg/day for vitamin B1 and 386 µg/day vs. 428 µg/day for folates for cases and controls respectively.

    Table 1.  Socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of parturient (Cases vs. controls).
    Cases Controls
    Socio-demographic characteristics n = 200 % Average Standard deviation n = 200 % Average Standard deviation
    26.09 5.58 25.81 5.57
    Age <20 34 17 22 11
    ≥ 20; 30≥ 122 61 134 67
    >30 44 22 44 22
    Origin Urban 45 22.5 32 16
    Rural 155 77.5 168 84
    Study level Illiterate 122 61 97 48.5
    Primary 47 23.5 55 27.5
    Middle School 28 14 36 18
    High school 3 1.5 12 6
    Profession Without 172 86 185 92.5
    Worker 25 12.5 15 7.5
    Employee 3 1.5 0 0
    Family type Nuclear 102 51 121 60.5
    Enlarged 98 49 79 39.5
    Monthly income level Low 145 72.5 111 55.5
    Middle 49 24.5 73 19.5
    High 6 3 16 8
    Anthropometric characteristics
    BMI 25.93 2.64 28.25 2.75
    <18.5 Kg/m2 (Underweight) 1 0.5 - -
    ≥18.5; <25 Kg/m2 (Normal weight) 71 35.5 15 7.5
    ≥25; <30 Kg/m2 (Overweight) 114 57 97 48.5
    ≥ to 30 Kg/m2 (Obesity) 14 7 88 44
    Weight 67.26 8.06 75.25 8.40
    Height 1.60 0.04 1.63 0.05

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Daily energy and nutritional intake of cases, controls and the total population compared to the recommended daily allowances (RDA).
    Energy and nutrient RDA§ Average Cases Standard deviation % RDA of cases SD Average controls SD % RDA of cookies SD Average of Total Female Population SD % RDA of total female population SD
    Energy (Kcal) 2500 2756 914.2 110.2 36.5 2915 927 116.6 37 2835 929.6 113.4 37.18
    Protein (mg) 60 90.30 49.4 150.5 82.3 101.40 52.6 169 87.6 95.85 51 159.75 85
    Vitamin B1 (mg) 1.4 1.02 0.6 72.85 42.8 1.45 0.9 103.57 64.2 1.23 0.75 87.85 53.5
    Vitamin C (mg) 80–85* 96 84.8 112.94 100 112 102.5 131.76 120.5 104 93.65 122.35 110.1
    Vitamin E (mg) 15 18.84 14.8 125.6 98.6 21.22 17.8 141.46 118.6 20.03 16.3 133.53 60.3
    Calcium (mg) 2500 538 288.4 21.52 11.5 841 449 33.64 17.9 689.5 368.7 27.58 14.74
    Iron (mg) 27 13.32 7.7 49.33 21.5 18.06 8.5 66.88 31.4 15.69 8.1 58.11 30
    Magnesium (mg) 400–350* 490 246.6 140 70.4 521.3 275.7 148.94 78.7 505.6 261 144.45 74.5
    Phosphorus (mg) 1250–700* 1545.16 731.8 220.73 104.5 1721.02 861.2 245.86 123 1633.09 796.5 233.29 113.7
    Zinc (mg) 13–11* 9.11 6.5 82.81 59 10.65 7 96.81 63.6 9.88 6.7 89.81 60.9
    Folates (µg) 600 386 175.9 64.33 29.31 428 186.6 71.33 31.1 407 181.2 67.83 30.2

    *Indicates levels used by pregnant women ≤18 years old and >18 years old. SD: standard deviation. §https://ods.od.nih.gov/HealthInformation/Dietary_Reference_Intakes.aspx

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Mean dietary diversity and food variety scores according to socio-demographic characteristics and BMI of the cases and the controls.
    Category Case Category controls
    Characteristics N case Mean DDS case Standard deviation P Mean FVS Standard deviation P N controls Mean DDS Standard deviation P Mean FVS Standard deviation P
    6.87 1.30 11.77 1.57 8.88 1.35 15.90 2.09
    Age <20 34 7.14 0.95 0.154 11.64 1.59 0.800 22 8.90 1.10 0.992 15.72 2.25 0.111
    ≥20; 30≥ 122 6.72 1.33 11.82 1.57 134 8.88 1.34 16.11 2.10
    >30 44 7.04 1.41 11.70 1.56 44 8.86 1.50 15.36 1.94
    Origin Urban 45 6.75 1.31 0.864 11.15 1.22 0.062 32 8.93 1.47 0.200 15.90 1.92 0.994
    Rural 155 6.90 1.30 11.94 1.61 168 8.86 1.33 15.90 2.31
    Education level Illiterate 122 6.95 1.33 0.993 11.74 1.58 0.411 97 9 1.25 0.024 16.10 2.17 0.309
    Primary 47 6.95 1.33 11.82 1.49 55 8.85 1.33 15.58 1.97
    Middle School 28 7.07 0.94 11.92 1.69 36 8.36 1.58 15.66 2.15
    High school 3 7 1 10.33 0.57 12 9.58 1.08 16.50 1.73
    Profession Without 172 6.87 1.34 0.948 11.83 1.61 0.354 185 8.82 1.34 0.032 15.89 2.13 0.757
    Worker 25 6.80 1 11.44 1.15 15 9.60 1.35 16.06 1.66
    Employee 3 7 1.73 11 2 -
    Family type Nuclear 102 6.92 1.36 0.853 11.67 1.48 0.207 121 8.80 1.38 0.650 15.66 1.94 0.159
    Extended 98 6.81 1.24 11.86 1.65 79 9 1.30 16.26 27
    Monthly income level Low 145 6.86 1.27 0.538 11.70 1.61 0.035 111 8.91 1.22 0.894 16 2.10 0.759
    Middle 49 6.95 1.41 12.12 1.42 73 8.82 1.45 15.80 2.01
    High 6 6.33 1.21 10.50 0.83 16 8.87 1.78 15.68 2.46
    BMI <18.5 (Underweight) 1 8 - 0.048 12 - 0.868 - - - 0.154 - - 0.301
    ≥18.5; <25 (Normal weight) 71 7.15 1.14 11.80 1.48 15 9.33 1.34 16 2.26
    ≥25; <30 (overweight) 114 6.75 1.37 11.78 1.64 97 8.71 1.39 16.12 2.24
    ≥ to 30 Obese 14 6.28 1.20 11.42 1.50 88 8.98 1.29 15.64 1.88

    Student test used for independent samples and the One-Way Anova Test. DDS: Dietary diversity score; FVS: Food variety score; BMI: Body mass index. P < 0.05.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The socio-demographic characteristics and BMI of the cases and controls according to the means of the dietary variety and diversity scores are presented in Table 3. The data in the table clearly show that the mean of the dietary diversity and variety scores of the controls exceeded that of the cases. In fact, the means of the diversity scores were 6.87 ± 1.30 for the cases and 8.88 ± 1.35 food groups for the controls. Likewise, the food variety scores were 11.77 ± 1.57 food items for the cases, lower than those found in the controls (15.90 ± 2.09). On the other hand, the level of education and the level of income of control women were clearly associated with the dietary diversity score. However, in the case group, a significant association was found between family type and food variety score.

    Figure 1.  Dietary diversity score of cases and controls.

    As presented in Figure 1, the dietary diversity estimated by the consumption of the different food groups was greater in the controls compared to the cases. The grain products, vegetables, sugary drinks, condiments and sweets food groups were consumed by all controls group. For the cases group, a high consumption of cereals and sugary drinks was recorded while the vegetables were consumed less (80.5%) than in the controls (100%). The analysis also showed a large difference in consumption for the rest of the food groups in the two groups of pregnant women with the proportions of consumption of the food groups of fruits (41.5%; 87.5%), dairy products (34%; 78%), meat and derivatives (41.5%; 71%), eggs (18%; 41.5%) and fish (12.5%; 29.5).

    Figure 2.  Food variety score of cases and controls.

    Figure 2 shows that the variety scores of controls and cases are distributed very unevenly within the sample. The results on the food variety of the controls group show an abundance of varied food items in the vegetables, meats and derivatives, fruits, cereals, sugary drinks and dairy products food groups with a moderate consumption of vegetables and eggs. For the cases group, the food variety scores of these food groups are less consumed compared to the controls except for the fish and legumes.

    The Moroccan diet which is Mediterranean type is based on a large consumption of foods of plant origin (cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds and olives), with olive oil as the main source of added fat, moderate to high consumption of fish and seafood, moderate of eggs, poultry and dairy products (cheese and yogurt) and low of red meat.

    The study data report a fairly high dietary diversity in control women compared to cases. Data analysis also made it possible to highlight significant links between the dietary diversity of these controls group women and their level of education and their profession. In fact, school-going women diversified their diet more than those who never attended school. Similar results from the literature have also shown a better quality diet in educated women [18]. In addition, the food variety score of the controls seems to be influenced by household characteristics. Women living in nuclear families vary more in their diet compared to those living in extendedfamilies [19].

    The results show that the most consumed foods among the controls group of pregnant women were cereals, vegetables, sugary drinks and sugar, condiments, oil products, fruits, meats and dairy products that are all frequently consumed. On the other hand, medium to low consumption is found for eggs, fish and legumes. The low consumption of fish observed for the two groups is probably linked to the insufficient purchasing power of households and the high prices charged. On the other hand, the more frequent consumption of sugar is linked to the subsidy of this product by the State.

    Nevertheless, the cases group diet appears to be less varied and less diversified. Indeed, the comparison of the averages of the DDS and FVS in the “cases” group of parturient with those obtained in the controls shows that these scores are markedly lower in the cases compared to the controls. The dietary diversity score of the cases appears to be influenced by the body mass index of women [20]. Similarly, the data analysis also demonstrates a statistically significant link between this score and the body size of the cases in the present study. Indeed, the consumption of cereals and sugary drinks that contribute to energy intake was similar in the two groups of cases and controls while the other food groups remained relatively less consumed by the cases. This diet poor in fruits and vegetables, meat and dairy products, associated with an appetite for sweetness and fat could justify the high prevalence of overweight recorded in the cases (57%), while most nutrient requirements are not met. This result is in agreement with the literature confirming that a good quality diet is correlated with a normal full-weight status [21],[22].

    The results of the variety score reported in this study reveal that the diet of the cases is with less food variety compared to that of the controls. Nevertheless, this variety score of the cases women group diet consists mainly in excessive consumption of sugary drinks, sugar and condiments to the detriment of foods that are essential for a good diet for pregnant women testifying of an unhealthy diet in this group. The consumption pattern in this population of pregnant women surveyed can be explained by several factors. On the one hand, the high price of certain foods such as red meats and fruits making them less accessible, especially as 72.5% of the cases group is of low socio-economic level. Several literature findings have also demonstrated the effect of socioeconomic status on the quality of food [23][25]. These food categories not only diversify the diet but also contribute to improving nutritional status. In fact, meats are a source of highly bioavailable iron and proteins that stimulate the absorption of non-heme iron [26]. It is the same for fruits known to provide a large number ofvitamins and minerals essential for the good progress of pregnancy.

    In addition to the economic aspect, eating habits are also a factor influencing the consumption profile. This is the case of cereals as their consumption remains important for both groups of parturient due to Moroccan dietary customs consisting in consuming bread accompanying allthe traditional dishes or with tea [27].

    To ensure the health of the mother and the fetus, pregnancy requires an increase in daily energy intake, which must cover the needs of fetal tissue synthesis and to compensate for the energy expenditure caused by the increase in the mother's weight [28]. A deficiency in energy intake can affect fetal growth below 1600 Kcal/day. However, our study found that the average daily energy intake of the parturient studied can provide information on a risk of weight excess given its intake higher than the recommended values (110% of the RDA of the cases vs. 116% of the RDA of the controls). This intake is however in the upper range of the recommendations not to be exceeded indicating an adequate caloric intake, both in cases and in controls.

    Similar results were previously reported by Belgnaoui and Belahsen on pregnant women in the same study province [29] whose energy intake was high and exceeded the energy needs estimated by FAO [30].

    Micronutrient requirements are also higher during pregnancy. Micronutrient deficiencies are a key determinant of FPN. Newborns exposed to FPN are two to three times more vulnerable to neonatal and infant mortality [31]. In addition to the risks for their immediate survival, FPN predisposes the unborn child to deficits, reduced physical capacity, increased risk of lifelong illness and even chronic diseases linked to nutrition [32]. Other nutrients are also supplied in excess showing that the diet of the parturient population studied provides these nutrients insufficient quantity. These are proteins, vitamin C, vitamin B1, vitamin E, magnesium and phosphorus whose intake exceeds the recommendations in cases and controls except for vitamin B1 which only covered 72.85 % of RDI in the cases women.

    In the opposite, the average daily intakes of other nutrients such as folates, calcium, iron and zinc were lower than the recommendations. Indeed, the daily intake of calcium represented only 1/5 th of the RDI for the cases and 1/3 for the controls. Iron only covers almost half (49%) of the daily requirement for the cases vs. 66.88% for controls while folates account for 64.33% of the RDA of cases. These nutrients are insufficiently provided by the diet despite the great dietary diversity of parturient as evidenced by the DDS. Indeed, even with an average consumption of 8 food groups (DDS) for the controls, these pregnant women did not reach the ideal value of calcium, iron and folates intakes. High dietary calcium deficiency could expose pregnant women at risks of decalcification or pregnancy complications such ashypertensive disorders [33]. These insufficient calcium intakes have been reported in other populations of pregnant women who, like the present study population, consume little dairyproducts [34]. Insufficient iron intake can expose the mother at a risk of developing iron deficiency anemia, responsible for asthenia, maternal and fetal tachycardia, dyspnea and pallor. In addition, the consumption of sweet tea, which belongs to the group of sugary drinks because of its content in sugar, remains very high in this population. The majority of parturient (86% of cases vs. 81% of controls) consumed indeed, an average of 3 glasses per day for the cases and 2 glasses per day of tea for the controls. This excessive consumption of sweet tea, in addition to providing excess energy, is also a source of inhibitors of iron absorption in these women constituting a major risk factor for developing anemia. This consumption level is somewhat similar to a previous study in the same region reporting thatpregnant women do not actually decrease their tea consumption during pregnancy [29].

    The data from the present study show that the cases diets can be characterized as with low dietary diversity and variety compared to that of the pregnant control women. In general, the study reveals that the diet of the women in the study sample did not cover adequately their nutrient needs. The results of the present survey showed that the diet of women who gave birth to low birth weight newborns was poorly diversified and less varied and that it is especially poor in certain nutrients essential for the good progress of pregnancy and childbirth.

    An important limitation of this study is related to the BMI of parturient. The participants' weight was weighed just before childbirth and the preconception BMI of these women could not be predicted. This study was also carried out on a specific sample from the Doukkala region. The results of this study provide for the first time a description of the quality of the diet of Moroccan pregnant women taking into account the seasonal variation in food consumption since the questionnaire concerned food consumption in a typical week.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors wish to thank the participants to this study, the staff at the El Jadida Provincial Hospital for their cooperation. The survey was supported by the Moroccan Ministry of Higher Education and Research.

    Funding source(s)



    This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare that they have no links of interest.

    [1] Barker DJP, Forsén T, Uutela A, et al. (2001) Size at birth and resilience to the effects of poor living conditions in adult life: longitudinal study. BMJ 323: 1273-1276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7324.1273
    [2] WHO Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death (1975) .Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40492.
    [3] Rush D (2001) Maternal nutrition and perinatal survival. Nutr Rev 59: 315-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06956.x
    [4] Lapillonne A (2011) Intrauterine growth retardation and adult outcome. Bull Acad Natle Med 195: 477-484.
    [5] High Commission for Planning (2015) Morocco between Millennium Development Goals and Sustainable Development Goals. Achievements and challenges. National Report p. 57Available from: https://odd.hcp.ma/National-Report-2015-OMD-Morocco_a2071.html.
    [6] Habte TY, Krawinkel M (2016) Dietary diversity score: a measure of nutritional adequacy or an indicator of healthy diet? J Nutr Health Sci 3: 303.
    [7] Torheim L, Ouattara F, Diarra MM, et al. (2004) Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants. Eur J Clin Nutr 58: 594-604. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601853
    [8] WHOWHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976 (1977) .
    [9] Jean-Claude F, Ireland-Ripert J, Toque C, et al. (1995) General food directory: composition table. 2nd edition revised and augmented. INRA-AFSSA-CIQUAL-TEC & DOC 928 pAvailable from: Fdi:010009113.
    [10] FAO (2010)  Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i1983e/i1983e00.pdf.
    [11] Huybregts LF, Roberfroid DA, Kolsteren PW, et al. (2009) Dietary behaviour, food and nutrient intake of pregnant women in a rural community in Burkina Faso. Matern Child Nutr 5: 211-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00180.x
    [12] Hatloy A, Torheim LE, Oshaug A (1998) Food variety-a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr 52: 891-898. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600662
    [13] Ruel MTIs dietary diversity an indicator of food Security or dietary quality? A review of Measurement issues and research needs, FCND discussion paper No. 140. International Food Policy Research Institute (2002) .USA: P. 58.
    [14] Mirmiran P, Azadbaht L, Esmailzadeh A, et al. (2004) Dietary diversity score in adolescents-a good indicator of the nutritional adequacy of diets: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 13: 56-60.
    [15] Savy M, Martin-Prevel Y, Sawadogo P, et al. (2005) Use of variety/diversity scores for diet quality measurements: relation with nutritional status of women in a rural area in Burkina Faso. Eur J Clin Nutr 59: 703-716. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602135
    [16] WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status: the Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry (‎1993: Geneva, Switzerland)‎ & World Health Organization (‎1995)  Physical status: the use of and interpretation of anthropometry, report of a WHO expert committee World Health Organization, Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37003.
    [17] Thompson FE, Byers T (1994) Dietary assessment resource manual. J Nutr 124: 2245S-2317S.
    [18] Jones AD (2017) On-Farm crop species richness is associated with household diet diversity and quality in subsistence- and market-oriented farming households in Malawi. J Nutr 147: 86-96. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.235879
    [19] Jones AD, Shrinivas A, Bezner-Kerr R (2014) Farm production diversity is associated with greater household dietary diversity in Malawi: findings from nationally representative data. Food Policy 46: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.001
    [20] Bellows AL, Canavan CR, Blakstad MM, et al. (2020) The relationship between dietary diversity among women of reproductive age and agricultural diversity in rural Tanzania. Food Nutr Bull 41: 50-60. doi: 10.1177/0379572119892405
    [21] Jaime PC, Bandoni DH, Duran AC da FL, et al. (2010) Diet quality index adjusted for energy requirements in adults. Cad Saude Publica 26: 2121-2128. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001100013
    [22] Heuer T, Krems C, Moon K, et al. (2015) Food consumption of adults in Germany: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II based on food history interviews. Br J Nutr 1-12.
    [23] Mullie P, Clarys P, Hulens M, et al. (2010) Dietary patterns and socioeconomic position. Eur J Clin Nutr 64: 231-238. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.145
    [24] Thodis A, Itsiopoulos C, Kouris-Blazos A, et al. (2018) Observational study of adherence to a traditional Mediterranean diet, sociocultural characteristics and cardiovascular disease risk factors of older Greek Australians from Mediterranean Islands (MEDIS Australia study: protocol and rationale. Nutr Diet 75: 44-51. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12360
    [25] Boustani NM, Guiné RPF (2020) Food choice motivations and perception of a healthy diet in a developing Mediterranean country. Open Agriculture 5: 485-495. doi: 10.1515/opag-2020-0048
    [26] Rahman MM, Abe SK, Rahman MS, et al. (2016) Maternal anemia and risk of adverse birth and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 103: 495-504. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.107896
    [27] Benjelloun S (2002) Nutrition transition in Morocco. Public Health Nutr 5: 135-140. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001285
    [28] Lauren W, Summerlee A, Dewey C, et al. (2014) Women's nutrient intakes and food-related knowledge in rural Kandal province, Cambodia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 23: 263-271.
    [29] Belgnaoui S, Belahsen R (2006) Nutrient intake and food consumption among pregnant women from an agricultural region of Morocco. Int J Food Sci Nutr 57: 19-27. doi: 10.1080/09637480500465261
    [30] FAO Food Balance Sheets: Definitions and Standards (2017) .Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS.
    [31] Cetin I, Berti C, Calabrese S (2010) Role of micronutrients in the periconceptional period. Hum Reprod Update 16: 80-95. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp025
    [32] Metgud CS, Naik VA, Maheshwar DM (2012) Factors affecting birth weight of a newborn—a community based study in rural Karnataka, India. PLoS One 7: e40040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040040
    [33] Hofmeyr GJ, Manyame S (2017) Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, or food fortification with calcium, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9.
    [34] EL Ayoubi L, Comte F (2018) The consequences of vegetarian and vegan diets during pregnancy and lactation, on pregnant women, fetuses, newborns and infants. Midwife Rev (In France).
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Souhaila Bellitir, Assma Barkat, Khalid Barkat, Rachid Fares, Hamid Chamlal, Banacer Himmi, Aicha Kharbach, Amina Barkat, Study of the Association Between Socioeconomic Determinants and Pregnancy Follow-Up Indicators of Mothers of Low-Birth-Weight Infants: Insights for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals, 2024, 5, 2965-730X, e02550, 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe02550
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2631) PDF downloads(125) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog