Citation: Raffaele Conte, Anna Di Salle, Francesco Riccitiello, Orsolina Petillo, Gianfranco Peluso, Anna Calarco. Biodegradable polymers in dental tissue engineering and regeneration[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1073-1101. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1073
[1] | Vincenzo Guarino, Tania Caputo, Rosaria Altobelli, Luigi Ambrosio . Degradation properties and metabolic activity of alginate and chitosan polyelectrolytes for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(4): 497-502. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.497 |
[2] | Iriczalli Cruz-Maya, Vincenzo Guarino, Marco Antonio Alvarez-Perez . Protein based devices for oral tissue repair and regeneration. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(2): 156-170. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.2.156 |
[3] | Osmar Alejandro Chanes-Cuevas, Adriana Perez-Soria, Iriczalli Cruz-Maya, Vincenzo Guarino, Marco Antonio Alvarez-Perez . Macro-, micro- and mesoporous materials for tissue engineering applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1124-1140. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1124 |
[4] | Eugen A. Preoteasa, Elena S. Preoteasa, Ioana Suciu, Ruxandra N. Bartok . Atomic and nuclear surface analysis methods for dental materials: A review. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(4): 781-844. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.781 |
[5] | Misato Kuroyanagi, Yoshimitsu Kuroyanagi . Tissue-engineered products capable of enhancing wound healing. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 561-581. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.561 |
[6] | Dorel Feldman . Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites: Recent contributions to engineering and medicine. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(1): 119-129. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021008 |
[7] | Miguel-Angel Rojas-Yañez, Claudia-Alejandra Rodríguez-González, Santos-Adriana Martel-Estrada, Laura-Elizabeth Valencia-Gómez, Claudia-Lucia Vargas-Requena, Juan-Francisco Hernández-Paz, María-Concepción Chavarría-Gaytán, Imelda Olivas-Armendáriz . Composite scaffolds of chitosan/polycaprolactone functionalized with protein of Mytilus californiensis for bone tissue regeneration. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(3): 344-358. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022021 |
[8] | Sukhwinder K. Bhullar, Harpal S. Buttar . Perspectives on nanofiber dressings for the localized delivery of botanical remedies in wound healing. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(2): 370-382. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.2.370 |
[9] | Chiara Emma Campiglio, Chiara Marcolin, Lorenza Draghi . Electrospun ECM macromolecules as biomimetic scaffold for regenerative medicine: challenges for preserving conformation and bioactivity. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 638-669. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.638 |
[10] | Dhonluck Manop, Chaileok Tanghengjaroen, Chatchai Putson, Panya Khaenamkaew . The effect of polyaniline composition on the polyurethane/polyaniline composite properties: The enhancement of electrical and mechanical properties for medical tissue engineering. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 323-342. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024018 |
Oral diseases are a broad class of pathologies, usually with inflammatory progression, that cause the destruction of the supporting apparatus of the teeth and potentially lead to tooth loss [1]. The dental clinical practice aims to control etiologic factors, mainly represented by microbial and bacterial infections, to treat these pathologies. However, these approaches very rarely end with the regeneration of ligaments and bones and recent dental practice uses guided tissue regeneration, bone replacement grafts with exogenous growth factors and tissue-engineered techniques for a complete functional recovery [2]. All these technologies involve the application of materials to support cell proliferation and provide signals [3]. In this contest, biodegradable polymers play an important role, because they (a) don't elicit an inflammatory response; (b) possess a degradation time coinciding with their function; (c) have appropriate mechanical properties for their intended use; (d) produce non-toxic degradation products that can be readily resorbed or excreted; and (e) include appropriate permeability and processability for designed application (Figure 1) [4]. Typically, biodegradable polymers would be classified in hydrolytically biodegradable polymers (HBP) and enzymatically biodegradable polymers (EBP) based on their bond susceptibility to hydrolytic and/or enzymatical cleavage.
Based on their physical–chemical characteristics, two classes of biodegradable polymers are available: HBS are characterized by a labile backbone of chemical bonds that deteriorates after water addition and include polyesters (PE) (such as poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolide) (PLGA) copolymers, polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF)), polyanhydrides (PAN), polycarbonates (PC), polyurethanes (PUR). EBP present ether or amide bonds on their chain and require catalysis to undergo meaningful degradation under physiological conditions. These materials include synthetically-derived polyethers (PETH), proteins and poly(amino acids) (e.g., collagen, elastin, and fibrin) and polysaccharides (e.g., alginate, chitosan, hyaluronic acid derivatives). In addition, in some materials such as PLA, PLGA, PCL, etc., the polymeric backbones can be subject to hydrolytic degradation due to enzymes or free radicals present in the physiological environment [5,6].
The application of BP in dentistry received major interest for dental regeneration and tissue engineering, although restorative take advantage of polymers controlled degradation rates to release bioactive molecules in a controlled and tunable manner [7]. In particular, anti-bacterial polymeric coatings of Ti oxide chitosan/heparin multilayers have been used by Yuan et al. to prevent biofilm formation and to increase restoration longevity [8]. Travan et al. [9] developed an antimicrobial nanocomposite using lactose-modified chitosan incorporated with Ag-NPs for the heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate as prosthetic restaurative material. The in vitro results demonstrated that the synthetized nanocomposite effectively killed both gram+ and gram– strains, without any cytotoxic effect respect to osteoblast-like cells, primary human fibroblasts or adipose-derived stem cells. Biodegradable polymers are used in restoration also for the local release of bone stimulating or resorptive drugs in the peri-implant region in order to obtain long-term dental implant success.
BP has also been used in dental regenerative approach as a scaffold for tissue engineering or biomaterials in the form of powders, solutions, or microparticles to stimulate local tissue repair (Figure 2) [10]. In order to enhance osseointegration, Rajeswari et al. [11] developed biomimetic coated titanium surfaces with nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/collagen nanofibers for dental and bone implant surfaces. The reported data showed that inorganic coating was able to enhance initial cell adhesion, cell proliferation, differentiation and mineralization on the implant surface. Furthermore, Riccitiello et al. [12] proposed electrospun PLA and PCL membranes loaded with resveratrol as promising nanomaterials to preserve post-extraction alveolar ridge volume. The two membranes were able to release resveratrol in a tunable and sustained manner with different kinetic acting simultaneously on two fronts: first counteract bone resorption, the second allows new bone formation.
Hydrolytically degradable materials include different polymers such as polyesters (PE), polyanhydrides (PAN), polycarbonates (PC), polyurethanes (PUR).
Polyesters (PE) are a class of polymers with simple synthesis and facile commercial availability. They have a backbone of aliphatic ester bonds and are mildly hydrophobic. Due to the hydrolytically stable nature of these linkages, polyesters with short aliphatic chains are utilized as degradable polymers for biomedical applications [13].
Polyglycolide or poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) is one of the first degradable polymers investigated for biomedical use. PGA has melting point (Tm) greater than 200 ℃, glass transition temperature (Tg) of 35–40 ℃ and very high tensile strength (12.5 GPa) [14]. Due to PGA rapid degradation, insolubility in many common solvents and production of glycolic acid as a side product (a substance linked with a strong inflammatory response) [15], limited research was conducted with PGA-based drug delivery devices, while recent papers focus on short-term tissue engineering scaffolds and on its utilization as filler material. Examples are the degradable suture DEXON® [16], the internal bone pin Biofix® [17] and many published works in which PGA is used as a scaffold for bone [18], cartilage [19], tendon [20], vaginal [21], intestinal [22], lymphatic [23] and spinal regeneration [24].
In dentistry, Ohara et al. evaluated the in vivo regeneration of porcine tooth germ-derived cells implanted in polyglycolic acid fiber and β-tricalcium phosphate porous block scaffolds for the formation of tooth bud-like structures [25]. Recently, Chang et al. proposed a chitosan-cPGA (polyelectrolyte complex hydrogel) in order to preserve the height of the alveolar ridge and facilitate bone formation in the alveolar socket after tooth extraction. These results also confirmed in Wistar rats through radiography and histomorphology, showed how injury treated with C-PGA exhibited faster healing than wounds treated with control or no treatment [26].
Polylactide (PLA) is a degradable polyester which possesses chiral molecules and comes in four forms: poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA), poly(D-lactic acid) (PDLA), poly(D, L-lactic acid) (PDLLA; a racemic mixture of PLLA and PDLA), and meso-poly(lactic acid). Among these, only PLLA and PDLLA are extensively studied. PLLA has Tg of 60–65 ℃, melting temperature of around 175 ℃ and mechanical strength of 4.8 GPa [27]. The additional methyl group in PLA causes the polymer to be much more hydrophobic and stable against hydrolysis, compared to PGA (high molecular weight PLLA requires more than 5 years to be completely resorbed in vivo) [28]. Then, PLLA is modified or copolymerized with other degradable polymers to reduce degradation time, as shown by the use of radiations to create radicals in the ester alpha carbon which, upon rearrangement, shortens the polymer backbone through the removal of an ester bond and the release of carbon dioxide [29]. PLLA is used as bone fixator, scaffold for bone [30], cartilage [31], tendon [32], neural [33] and vascular [34] regeneration. Similarly, PDLLA is an amorphous polymer with the random positions of its two isomeric monomers within the polymer chain. Poly(D, L-lactic acid) has Tg of 55–60 ℃ and mechanical strength of 1.9 GPa [14]. This polyester requires over a year to properly erode and it is commonly used as drug delivery film [35] and tissue engineering scaffold [36]. All these polyesters, also if classified as hydrolytically degradable, are in vivo effectively degraded by the enzymes lipase, esterase, and alcalase [37].
In dentistry, the maintaining of alveolar ridge dimensions is crucial for a successful placement and functional dental implant. In order to reduce alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction, different material can be used in tissue regeneration, such as membranes, graft materials, and biodegradable space fillers [38]. Thomas et al. investigated how the role of PLA space fillers fabricated by fusing porous PLA particles loaded with drugs can help to promote regeneration and maintain the original socket dimensions [39]. Serino et al. proposed Fisiograft, a synthetic copolymer composed of PLA and PGA, as a space filler during ridge preservation. In this study, patients who received Fisiograft after tooth extraction and evaluated 6 months following treatment, exhibited newly formed bone well mineralized and structured, indicating how such bioabsorbable synthetic material was able to prevent alveolar bone resorption [40]. Riccitiello et al. synthesized PLA- and PCL-loading resveratrol electrospun nanofibers able to induce dental pulp stem cells differentiation into osteoblast-like cells and inhibit osteoclast differentiation [12].
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) is a polymer derived from the random copolymerization of PLA (both L- and D, L-lactide forms) and PGA. PLGA properties can be modulated through the careful choice of copolymer composition, exhibiting different degradation times due to the simultaneous action of enzymatic and hydrolytic mechanisms [41]. PLGA is the most investigated degradable polymer used in a wide range of medical applications, and an excellent candidate for application in tissue engineering and drug delivery. In fact, PLGA copolymers are used as suture materials [42] and as microspheres, microcapsules, nanospheres or nanofibers to deliver chemotherapeutics [43], proteins [44], vaccines [45], antibiotics [46], analgesics [47], anti-inflammatory [48] and siRNA [49].
Moreover, PLGA demonstrates great cell adhesion and good proliferation properties making it an excellent candidate for application in tissue engineering. In particular, in regenerative dentistry, together with stem cell-based therapy, PLGA scaffolds are used to regenerate damaged tissues.
PLGA is also utilized for alveolar ridge augmentation through the reconstruction of atrophic sites in association with bone allograft and osteoinductive proteins [50] or for bone formation as carrier incorporated with autogenous bone graft [51], morphogenetic protein BMP-2 [52] or simvastatin [53].
In dentistry, PLGA has different applications. For example, PLGA microspheres produced by Sousa et al. are able to deliver amoxicillin at significant levels in the root canal [54] while Chitosan coated PLGA microspheres incorporated with recombinant Streptococcus mutants glucan-binding protein D (rGbpD) are potentially used as a dental vaccine [55]. Similarly, PLGA microspheres with hydroxyapatite and ofloxacin showed good results against S. aureus and E. coli [56], while PDLLA–PLGA microparticles filled with growth and differentiation factors accelerate osteogenesis, bone maturation, fibers realignment, and cementogenesis of the periodontal apparatus in rats maxillae [57].
Recently, it has been proposed that scaffolds able to overcome the limitations of currently used dental bone grafting materials. Indeed, Brown at al. developed three-dimensional magnesium/PLGA composite scaffolds for dental socket preservation and orthopedic bone regeneration. These scaffolds could decrease inflammation observed with clinically used PLGA devices, increase BMSC proliferation and provide a safe and effective environment for bone regeneration [58].
Shirakata et al. demonstrated how PLGA/hydroxyapatite scaffolds promote cell proliferation, differentiation of stem cells [59] and regenerate bone if seeded with differentiated fat cells [60]. Marei et al. used PLGA scaffolds alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cells or dental pulp stem cells, against maxillary sinus augmentation, obtaining bone regeneration [61]. Furthermore, PLGA scaffolds with stromal cells from the adipose tissue are able to regenerate bones, periodontal ligaments and cementum layers [62]. Another dental application of PLGA relates to the use of this polymer to create tooth-like structures which are subsequently transplanted in vivo. In particular, Zang et al. proposed bilayered poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/wool keratin (WK) membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and as a promising application in periodontal disease. These composites were fabricated using solvent casting and electrospinning methods. Experiments conducted in beagle dogs for different weeks and GTR results showed that these composites could effectively promote the periodontal tissue regeneration after 12 weeks [63]. PLGA is also used for sustained drug release in endodontics. For example, PLGA microspheres produced by Sousa et al. are able to deliver amoxicillin at significant levels in the root canal [54]. These last examples show the importance of the addition of inorganic components, such as hydroxyapatite or bioactive glass to improve material characteristics. In addition, PLGA microspheres containing simvastatin [64], endothelial growth factors [65] or dexamethasone [66] significantly enhance bone formation. Other applications of PLGA relates to better osteointegration of titanium implants through PLGA microparticles loaded with growth factors [67]. In particular, PLGA microparticles loaded with insulin improved biomechanical retention of titanium implants on type Ⅰ diabetic rats [68]. Finally, polylactide-co-glycolide surfaces can be functionalized for imparting antibacterial properties [69]. For example, such devices are functionalized by Gentile et al., using nanoscale coatings with layer-by-layer assembly [69].
Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a semicrystalline polyester with low in vivo degradation rate (due to the synergic action of hydrolytic and enzymatic mechanisms [70]), melting temperature of 55–60 ℃, glass transition temperature of –54 ℃ and high solubility in a wide range of organic solvents [71]. Moreover, it has the low tensile strength (~23 MPa), but very high elongation at breakage (4700%) making it a good elastic biomaterial [15,72]. PCL is used in the production of implants composed of adhered nano/microspheres [73], electrospun fibers [12,74] or porous networks [75] used for regeneration of bone [76], ligament [77], cartilage [78], nerve [79] and vascular tissues [80]. In addition, PCL is often blended or copolymerized with other polymers like polyesters and polyethers to expedite overall polymer erosion [81].
The type of biomaterials used and the manufacturing methods play a fundamental role in the outcomes, contributing to the creation of a favorable environment for cellular colonization, proliferation, and differentiation. In dentistry, PCL elicits odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp cells (DPSCs). Recently, Louvrier et al. isolated DPSCs from both carious and healthy mature teeth. These cells were able to colonize and proliferate within a polycaprolactone cone and to differentiate into functional odontoblast-like cells secreting ECM similar to mineralized dentine matrix [82].
Similarly, Chuenjitkuntaworn et al. fabricated a 3D-polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold and studied its ability to support cell growth, gene expression, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, dental pulp stem cells, and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The scaffold supported the growth of all these three types of stem cells and improved calcium deposition [83]. Finally, Baranowska-Korczyc et al. evaluated the antibacterial activity of polymer electrospun materials in three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds for potential dental applications. Polycaprolactone (PCL) was used as a base for gingival fibroblast (HGF-1 cell line) growth and ampicillin was incorporated within the nanofibers and subsequently tested by zone inhibition against an oral strain of Streptococcus sanguinis. Such material, able to reduce dental caries pathogen, resulted in a promising material for dental engineering (Figure 3) [84].
Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) is a high-strength polyester with the ability to be cross-linked through the unsaturated bonds in its backbone. Then, its degradation depends on molecular weight, cross-linker and cross-linking density [85]. Physically, PPF is an injectable liquid which becomes solid after cross-linking. Poly(propylene fumarate) is used as filling for bone defects [86] and as a depot for the long-term delivery of ocular drugs [87]. Besides, in osteogenic tissue engineering, PPF is used in association with hydroxyapatite [88] or alumoxane [89] to create bioactive scaffolds. Recently, the benefits of such material were combined with osteoconductive HA nanoparticles in order to provide robust, compressive and mechanical properties for bone tissue engineering [90].
In dentistry, Alge et al. produced Poly(Propylene Fumarate) reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites and implanted them into calvarial defects in rabbits for 6 weeks with mesenchymal stem cells. This material resulted in numerous bone nodules with active osteoblasts within the scaffold pores [91]. Similarly, Shahabi et al developed degradable poly(propylene fumarate)/bioactive glass (PPF/BG) composite scaffolds based on a microsphere technique and investigated the effects of BG content on the characteristics of these composite scaffolds. The silicon released from the BG enhanced the formation of the calcium phosphate layer of teeth [92].
Polyanhydrides (PAN) is a class of surface eroding polymers that contain two carbonyl groups linked by an ether bond. The degradation of the anhydride bond is highly dependent on polymer backbone chemistry, ranging by over six orders of magnitude. PAN are used for the delivery of chemotherapeutics [93], antibiotics [94], vaccines [95] and proteins [96]. In particular, simple aliphatic homo-polyanhydrides have limited applications due to their rapid degradation, while methacrylated polyanhydrides and cross-linked polyanydrides are used in tissue engineering [97].
In dentistry, these polymers have gained much attention due to their application for oral pathologies. Hasturk et al. studied the effects of the use of calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around dental implants and extraction sockets, showing how this device provides a great bone-to-implant contact with a well-organized implant-bone interface and a crestal augmentation during immediate implant placement [98]. Uhrich patented a biodegradable polyanhydrides linked with low molecular weight drugs containing a carboxylic acid, amine, thiol, alcohol or phenol group within their structure as polymeric drug delivery systems for oral pathologies [99].
Polycarbonates (PC) are linear polymers with two geminal ether bonds and a carbonyl linkage. Structurally, such connections are hydrolytically stable but PCA possesses rapid surface in vivo degradation [100]. The most extensively studied polycarbonate is poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), fabricated into microparticles [101], discs [102] and gels [103] alone or with polyesters or polyethers [104] for the delivery of angiogenic agents [105] and antibiotics [102]. Moreover, polycarbonates with cyclohexane or propylene in the monomer backbone [106] or with bulky side groups linked through an ester bond to the carbons of the backbone [107] are used in tissue engineering.
In dentistry, polycarbonates are widely used in different applications. For example, Pronych et al. [108] compared the dimensional stability and dehydration of a thermoplastic polycarbonate denture base resin with two conventional polymethyl methacrylate materials. The thermoplastic resins have similar behavior but less dimensional change caused by dehydration. Conversely, Tanimoto et al. [109] proposed an alternative to current metallic orthodontic wires, developing glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) wires made from polycarbonate and E-glass fiber. Biological assays on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) showed that GFRP wires were not cytotoxic. Recently, Zhang et al. [110] presented a new model for alveolar jaw bone regeneration. They promoted tyrosine-derived polycarbonate polymer scaffolds containing beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), able to support the rapid regeneration of osteo-dentin-like mineralized jaw tissue using human dental pulp cells (hDPCs).
Polyurethanes (PUR) are biocompatible, moldable, strong polymers that possess ester bonds with geminal amide bonds. Such materials are typically synthesized by polycondensation of diisocyanates with alcohols and amines. PUR consist of both hard and soft segments. The hard segments are composed of functional groups (e.g., amide, urea, or ester-amide) able to form hydrogen bonds, making the structure rigid and unable to undergo conformational changes. The soft segments are of polymenthide chains. The repeating monomers are flexible and withstand conformational changes [111]. For these characteristics, PUR mime body tissues and are extensively used in prostheses like cardiac assist devices [112], small vascular shunts [113] and tracheal tubes [114]. Same properties are available in polyurethane reinforced carbon fibers [115]. In the field of dentistry, PUR is tested as arch models able to regulate the position of the teeth [116] and as substitutes of braces for removable dental aligner restorative treatments (e.g., Invisalign) [117]. Moreover, Lee and Cho created an altered polyurethane casts for a partial removable dental prosthesis that facilitate separation after processing [118] while Selten et al. produced a modified polyurethane foam as a local hemostatic agent after dental extractions [119].
Table 1 recaps the characteristics of the presented hydrolytically degradable polymers.
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Polyesters (PE) | (Polyglycolide or poly-glycolic acid) (PGA) | Tooth bud-like structures [25]; Fleece scaffold to counteract the postoperative apical growth of epithelium on teeth [26] |
Polylactide (PLA) | Ridge and socket preservation [39]; Space fillers to promote regeneration and maintenance of original socket dimensions [40]; Prevention of alveolar bone resorption [38] | |
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) | PLGA/hydroxyapatite scaffolds [59,60]; Scaffolds with mesenchymal stem cells or dental pulp stem cells against maxillary sinus augmentation [61]; Scaffold with stromal cells to regenerate bones, periodontal ligaments and cementum layers [62]; Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/wool keratin (WK) membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) [63]; Microspheres delivering amoxicillin [54]; Microspheres with hydroxyapatite and ofloxacin against E. coli [56]; PDLLA–PLGA microparticles with different applications in periodontal apparatus in rats maxillae [57]; Microspheres containing simvastatin [64], endothelial growth factors [65] and dexamethasone [66]; Microparticles loaded growth factors [67] and insulin [68] to improve titanium implant | |
Polycaprolactone (PCL) | Scaffold for DPSCs differentiation [82]; 3D-polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold for different mesenchymal stem cells [83]; Electrospun materials in three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to reduce dental caries pathogen [84] | |
Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) | Reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites [91]; Bioactive glass composite scaffolds [92] | |
Polyanhydrides (PAN) | The device around dental implants and for extraction sockets [98]; Polymeric drug delivery systems for oral pathologies [99] | |
Polycarbonates (PC) | Thermoplastic polycarbonate denture base resin [108]; Glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) wires of polycarbonate and E-glass fiber [109]; Tyrosine-derived polycarbonate polymer scaffolds of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) to support alveolar jaw bone repair and regeneration [110] | |
Polyurethanes (PUR) | Device for arch models [116]; Substitutes of braces for removable dental aligner restorative treatments [117]; Partial removable dental prosthesis [118]; Local hemostatic agent after dental extractions [119] |
Enzymatically degradable polymers are materials that possess bonds that require catalysis to undergo meaningful degradation under physiological conditions. Most of these polymers contain ether or amide bonds. They are classified in synthetic polyethers, proteins, and poly(amino acids) and polysaccharides (Table 2).
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Synthetic Polyethers | Synthetically-derived polyethers (PETH) | Coating on titanium dental implants [125]; Coatings on maghemite nanoparticles for treating dental hypersensitivity [126]; Hydroxyapatite disks with polydopamine-induced polyethylene glycol coating against a multi-species cariogenic biofilm [127]; Polyethylene glycol hydrogel with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate for guided bone regeneration procedures [128]; Poly(propylene glycol) as dental composites [129]; Self-etch adhesive system for the enamel based on acidic monomers of polypropylene glycol phosphate [130]; Pluronic F-127 hydrogels as scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells [131]; Pluronic as drug delivery platform for the prevention and treatment of pathogenic plaque biofilms [132] |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Collagen | Scaffolds loaded with different growth factors for regenerating dental-pulp-like tissue [145]; Collagen-based barrier membranes for periodontal and implant therapy [146]; Collagen/fibrin microbeads as a delivery system for Ag-doped bioactive glass and DPSCs [147] |
Elastin | Scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation [152] and for the treatment of alveolar bone loss [153] | |
Fibrin | Scaffold for dental pulp revascularization procedures [158]; Healing biomaterial scaffold for bone and soft tissue regeneration [159]; Device to promote periodontal wound healing and regeneration [160] | |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Natural Poly(amino acids) | Polymeric calcium phosphate cements incorporated with poly-γ-glutamic acid [164]; Poly(L-lysine) coatings on titanium scaffolds [165]; Composites containing Poly(L-lysine) to prevent recurrent caries and restoration failures [166] |
Synthetic poly(amino acids) | Poly(L-glutamic acid) based compound for use in endodontic regeneration and for the treatment of dental inflammatory diseases [170]; Zinc-doped Portland-based resinous sealing cement linked with poly(aspartic acid) for dentine remineralization[171] | |
Polysaccharides | Hyaluronic acid (HA) | Hyaluronan gel for local application in surgery procedure [178] and in chronic periodontitis [179]; Restylane for endodontic treatment [180]; Hyaluronan scaffolds for regenerative procedure [181]; Injectable tissue engineering composite of hyaluronic acid gel, tooth bud-derived dental mesenchymal cells and transforming growth factor-b1 [182] |
Chitosan (CS) | Chitosan pellicles for the study of bacterial adhesion [191]; Chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers to enhance antibacterial effect [192]; Chitosan-based dental adhesives [193]; Chitosan combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles (CHT/BG-NP) for periodontium regeneration [194] | |
Alginate | RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid tripeptide)-modified useful in oral and maxillofacial surgery [203]; Nano bioactive glass ceramic particles (nBGC) incorporated in alginate composite scaffold for periodontal tissue regeneration [204] |
Synthetically-derived polyethers (PETH) are highly biocompatible polymers widely used in drug delivery and tissue engineering. PETH are degraded by esterases, also if human equivalents of these enzymes have yet to be identified [120]. All biomedical research with PETH focus on the use of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(propylene glycol) (PPG), often in the form of Pluronic ([PEG]n-[PPG]m-[PEG]n) [121]. Pluronic is formulated into hydrogels with relatively weak mechanical properties (maximum shear storage modulus of 13.7 kPa at 20 wt% Pluronic) used for drug delivery [122] and soft tissue engineering [123]. PEG alone is commonly used to cap (PEGylation) or coat other degradable polymers in order to convey steric stabilization, limiting the interactions between the device and the host. This is especially important in preventing phagocytosis of particle-based delivery vehicles [124].
In dentistry, the development of Polyethylene glycol-like coatings (PEG-like) on the titanium surface by plasma polymerization lead to a surface with low bacterial adhesion toward and adequate cell response [125]. PEG was also used by Dabbagh et al. to coat maghemite nanoparticles for treating dental hypersensitivity. These nanoparticles exhibited a significant potential for reducing the permeability of dental tubules but also to transfer other therapeutic agents inside the tubules [126]. Mei et al. [127] developed hydroxyapatite disks with polydopamine-induced-polyethylene glycol coating, finding anti-biofouling effect against a multi-species cariogenic biofilm on the root dentine surface. Thoma et al. used polyethylene glycol hydrogel as a matrix in combination with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate for guided bone regeneration procedures. The presence of PEG led to a greater bone augmented area [128]. Poly(propylene glycol) is used in dental composites due to its cytocompatibility. For example, Walters et al. affirmed that the use of composites containing PPG results in materials with excellent conversion, depth of cure and mechanical properties, without increasing shrinkage. Moreover, they are more cytocompatible than those containing acrylates [129]. Münchow et al. synthesized an acidic monomer based on polypropylene glycol phosphate methacrylate to constitute a self-etch adhesive system for the enamel [130]. Diniz et al. used thermoreversible Pluronic F-127 hydrogels as a scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells in order to test their osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation capacity. After 2 weeks of differentiation in vitro, dental pulp stem cells exhibited high levels of mRNA expression for osteogenic and adipogenic gene markers [131]. Pluronic is also used as a drug delivery platform for the prevention and treatment of pathogenic plaque biofilms. Indeed, Mogen et al. demonstrated that Pluronic micelles interact with the biofilm presumably via interaction with the sucrose-dependent biofilm matrix, and are a viable treatment option for plaque biofilms [132].
Proteins are high molecular weight polymers composed of amino acid monomers linked by amide bonds. Proteins and amino acid-derived polymers are used in sutures, scaffolds, and drug delivery devices with prolonged degradation time.
Collagen is the most abundant protein in the human body and is a major component of ligament, cartilage, tendon, skin, and bone. It also forms the structural network of other tissues like blood vessels. Collagen is composed of polypeptide strands bearing triamino acid blocks of Glycine-X-Y, where X and Y are a number of different amino acids, mainly proline and hydroxyproline [133]. These polypeptides are formed into left-handed triple helix microfibrils that organize in different architectures to create collagen fibers with appropriate mechanical properties for their function. Collagen has various medical applications due to its biocompatibility, processability, mechanical strength, and enzymatic degradability by collagenases and metalloproteinases [134]. In fact, it is used as suture material in surgery [135], as depot delivery device in the local extended release of antibiotics [136], DNA [137], siRNA [138], proteins [139] and as hemostatic sealant [140]. In order to improve collagen's potential as a biomaterial, it is combined with other degradable polymers [141] or modified through crosslinking [142], association with bioactive molecules [143] and enzymatic pre-treatment [144].
In dentistry, collagen has been widely tested in regenerative studies. Kim et al. proposed collagen scaffolds loaded with different growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and/or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). The implantation of these scaffolds into native root canal tooth revealed re-cellularized and revascularized dental pulp tissue [145]. Collagen-based membranes are also used in periodontal and implant therapy as barriers to prevent epithelial migration and allow cells with the regenerative capacity to repopulate the defect area creating a favorable environment for cellular development. Specifically, collagen bioresorbable membranes for guided tissue regeneration are chemotactic for periodontal ligament fibroblasts, acts as a barrier for migrating epithelial cells, provides hemostasis and serves as a fibrillar scaffold for early vascular and tissue ingrowth [146]. Recently, collagen/fibrin microbeads delivering silver doped bioactive glass (Ag-BG) and Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) have shown antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis, revealing a successful approach for applications in tissue regeneration [147].
Elastin is a highly elastic polymer, responsible for contraction of vascular and lung tissues, composed of cross-linked tropoelastin molecules. These molecules are produced intracellularly by smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts and are cross-linked outside the cells to become elastic [148]. Natural elastin is insoluble and elicits an immune response [149]. In order to overcome these limitations, tropoelastin is treated to undergo an irreversible temperature transition above 25 ℃ to change its molecular organization from a disordered to an ordered state, obtaining favorable properties as injectable drug delivery system [150]. Moreover, synthetic elastins are produced through controlled molding, conservation and cross-link [151].
In dentistry, elastin and elastin-like polypeptides are used in association with collagen. For example, Gurumurthy et al. improved the mechanical characteristics of collagen through the use of elastin-like polypeptides. The obtained scaffold allowed osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells cultures [152]. The proliferation and expression of differential markers in osteoblastic cells were evaluated also by Amruthwar et al. to validate the use of these devices for the treatment of alveolar bone loss [153].
Fibrin is a large cross-linked biopolymer composed of fibronectin, involved in the natural clotting process. The use of fibrin as a biomaterial results from its biocompatibility, biodegradability, injectability, and ability to enhance cell proliferation [154]. In dentistry, the most recognized application of fibrin is in the platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) [155,156], a biomaterial that serves as a vehicle in tissue regeneration, promotes a sustained release of growth factors and stimulates the environment for wound healing [157]. Moreover, PRF is able to stimulate the proliferation of human dental pulp cells, osteoblasts, oral bone MSCs, gingival fibroblasts, periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) and it augments angiogenesis and regulates the inflammatory reaction acting as a potential scaffold in pulp revascularization procedures of the necrotic immature permanent tooth [158]. In fact, Zhao et al. created a dental scaffold material for tissue regeneration in the oral cavity consisting on cell sheet fragments of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) granules able to promote periodontal wound healing and PDL regeneration in avulsed tooth reimplantation [159]. The second generation of PRF was produced by Dohan et al. introducing a method that concentrated most platelets and leukocytes from a blood harvest into a single autologous fibrin biomaterial [160].
Natural poly(amino acids) are biodegradable, ionic polymers composed of repeated units of one type of amino acid, bonded by amide linkages. The two most commonly studied natural poly(amino acids) used as biomaterials are poly(γ-glutamic acid) (γPGA) and poly(L-lysine), investigated as delivery systems for antibiotics, vaccines, DNA and proteins [161], with intrinsic antimicrobial [162] and antitumor activities [163] and as tissue engineering scaffolds.
In dentistry, Kim et al. produced polymeric calcium phosphate cements incorporated with poly-γ-glutamic acid, in order to confer mechanical strength and to retard hydroxyapatite formation [164]. Poly(L-lysine) is also widely used for the formation of coatings on dental materials. In particular, Varoni et al. studied in vitro and in vivo effects of poly-L-lysine coating on titanium osseointegration. Such coating safely enhanced calcium deposition and implant early osseointegration in animals, suggesting promising evidence to optimize the surface properties of these dental implants [165]. Poly(L-lysine) also exhibits antimicrobial properties as reported by Walters et al. who investigated its antimicrobial properties in mono/tricalcium phosphates–hydroxyapatite composites showing how these composites had great potential in the prevention of recurrent caries and restoration failures [166].
Synthetic poly(amino acids) derive from the industrial polymerization of several homo- and co-poly(amino acids). Poly(L-glutamic acid) (L-PGA) and poly(aspartic acid) (PAA) are considered promising biomaterials in this field. Poly(L-glutamic acid) has the same primary structure of γPGA but with the amide linkage made with the α-carbon amine group instead of the γ-carbon amine group. It is biocompatible, nonimmunogenic and is used as a DNA delivery device [167] and for the construction of layer-by-layer film assembly with negatively charged polymers [168]. PAA is a highly water-soluble ionic polymer with carboxylate content greater than PGA or L-PGA. It is degraded by lysosomal enzymes and it is often copolymerized with other polymers (e.g., PLA, PCL, PEG, etc.) [169] to create micellar structures acting as smart delivery vehicles.
In dentistry, Benkirane-Jessel et al. patented a poly(L-glutamic acid) based compound linked to Melanocortin peptides for the use in endodontic regeneration and for the treatment of dental inflammatory diseases. Such device promotes human pulp fibroblast adhesion, cell proliferation and reduces the inflammatory state of lipopolysaccharide stimulated pulp fibroblasts observed in gram-negative bacterial infections [170]. Osorio et al. developed a novel zinc-doped Portland-based resinous sealing cement linked with poly(aspartic acid) with improved bonding efficacy and dentine remineralization ability. The poly(aspartic acid) application onto demineralized dentine inhibited mineral phase crystallization, enhancing the remineralization potential of the Portland microfillers at the resin-dentine bonded interface [171].
Polysaccharides are polymers composed of monosaccharide units linked through glycosidic linkages, a type of ether bond. Due to their biodegradability, processability and bioactivity they result very promising biomaterials.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a linear anionic polysaccharide, member of the glycosaminoglycan family, consisting of alternating units of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and glucuronic acid. HA is isolated from rooster combs and bovine vitreous humor, while in humans is found in synovial fluid and vitreous humor and plays where it plays an important structural role in articular cartilage and skin. HA homopolymer is too weak and fluid to create a supportive scaffold, so, in order to overcome this limitation, HA is cross-linked with ethyl esters, benzyl esters or other biodegradable polymers to enhance the mechanical properties while retaining excellent biocompatibility [172]. HA hydrogels are extremely versatile and can be fabricated into sheets, membranes, sponges, tubes, fibers and scaffolds for wound healing [173], regeneration of the trachea [174], cartilage [175], vasculature [176] and nerve tissues [177]. In the field of dentistry, hyaluronic acid shows anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial effects in the treatment of periodontitis and in endodontic procedures. El-Sayed et al. investigated the effect of local application of 0.8% Hyaluronan gel in conjunction with periodontal surgery. Statistically significant differences were noted for clinical attachment level and gingival recession [178]. Similarly, Gontiya et al. analyzed the clinical and histological outcomes of the local subgingival application of 0.2% HA gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planning in chronic periodontitis patients. The treated sites showed reduced inflammatory infiltrates [179]. As promising scaffold for Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REPs), Chrepa et al. [180] investigated the effect of Restylane, a Food and Drug Administration approved hyaluronic acid-based gel, on stem cells of the apical papilla (SCAP) in order to evaluate the ability of this gel to induce cell viability and mineralizing differentiation. After a defined time, Restylane promoted greater alkaline phosphatase activity and upregulation of all mineralized markers such as dentin sialophosphoprotein, dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein-1, and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein. In addition, regenerative potential of hyaluronan scaffolds proposed by Ferroni et al. confirmed the osteo-regenerative properties of these constructs, after implantation into rat calvarial critical-size defects [181]. Finally, similar results were found by Tan et al. who proposed an injectable tissue engineering composite of hyaluronic acid gel (HAG), tooth bud-derived dental mesenchymal cells (DMCs) and transforming growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1). Moreover, its application was further demonstrated in in vivo model, in empty tooth slices and pulp chambers of mini pigs. This injectable scaffold would give a great contribution to the future clinical regeneration of dentin-pulp in REPs (Figure 4) [182].
Chitosan (CS) is the deacetylated derivative of chitin, a linear polysaccharide consisting of β-1, 4 linked N-acetylglucosamine units that form the exoskeletons of many arthropods. This polysaccharide is composed of randomly located units of D-glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine and is degraded by the enzyme chitinase, chitosanase, lysozyme, cellulase, protease, lipase and pepsin [183]. Chitosan degradation rate depends on the degree of acetylation and crystallinity and can be regulated through the modification of side groups [184]. Moreover, CS is water absorptive, oxygen permeable, haemostatic, chemoattractive, antibacterial and assists wound healing [185,186]. However, chitosan is mechanically weak and it is often crosslinked or combined with other degradable polymers to form films, membranes, sponges, particles, fibers, and gels used for bandages [187], delivery devices [188,189] and tissue engineering scaffolds for regenerative applications [190]. Uses of CS in dentistry are related to its antibacterial and wound healing actions. Busscher et al. evaluated the effects of a chitosan on bacterial adhesion and growth on chitosan treated pellicles founding a reduction in bacterial adhesion and bacterial death upon contact [191]. Chitosan has been used in the development of drug control releasing systems in order to overcome endodontic failure, affected by microbial infections in the root canal system and/or the periradicular area. In particular, Barreras et al. combined the properties of chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers to enhance the antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine showing promising results to improve regenerative procedures in periapical surgery [192].
Researchers have also explored chitosan in dentifrices and dental adhesives as antibacterial activity. In particular, Elsaka evaluated the antibacterial activity and bond strength of dental adhesives modified with various concentrations of chitosan. Adhesives with the lower concentrations of chitosan were more effective against S. Mutans. Moreover, a greater concentration of chitosan has negative effects on microtensile bond strength, the degree of conversion and pH [193]. Recently, more attention has been given to the use of chitosan combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles (CHT/BG-NP) in order to produce novel scaffolds for periodontium regeneration. These nanocomposites, due to their biocompatibility, effectively supported attachment and growth of cells, promoted the metabolic activity of human periodontal ligament cells and induced greater cell matrix mineralization [194]. Alginate is a high biocompatible linear copolymer composed of β-D-mannuronic acid and α-L-glucuronic acid linked by a 1–4 glycosidic bond commonly extracted from the cell wall of brown algae. Alginate forms spontaneous gels when exposed to divalent cations (e.g., Ca2+). Such gel is used as a drug delivery device, wound healing dressing and tissue engineering scaffold [195]. Alginate is also available as composite systems in which it is associated with polyesters [196], polyethers [197], collagen [198] and chitosan [199] to effectively deliver drugs or proteins [200] and to form scaffolds composed of films, sponges, fibers, gels and freeze casted porous networks used in regenerative engineering [201]. Cellular adhesion on these devices is improved by side group modification of alginate with the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptides [202]. The most diffused use of alginate in dentistry is for periodontal regeneration. Moshaverinia et al. evaluated bone regeneration capacity of MSCs derived from the orofacial tissue. In particular, they compared periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) to gingival mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) both encapsulated in RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid tripeptide)-modified alginate scaffold. Studies in vitro and in vivo showed that PDLSCs were able to repair the calvarial defects by promoting the formation of mineralized tissue, while GMSCs showed lower osteogenic differentiation capability [203]. Such device results particularly useful in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Similarly, nano-bioactive glass ceramic particle (nBGC) incorporated in alginate composite scaffold were able to increase alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) of the human periodontal ligament fibroblast (hPDLF) cells seeded on these scaffolds [204]. Table 2 recaps the characteristics of the listed enzimatically degradable polymers.
The use of biopolymers in dental practice is specified in various regulatory requirements and directives. One such regulation is the new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 for Medical Devices, which came into force on May 25th 2017, replacing the former EU Directive 93/42/EEC. These requirements relate to safety, quality and suitability. Moreover, it is expressly required special attention to the choice of materials being used. This is especially true when considering the toxicity and mutual compatibility with tissues, cells, body fluids, and other used materials. The intended use of the medical device must always be considered in this process. Then, manufacturers of medical products tend to select polymers for their applications certified for biocompatibility. A similar process is valid in the US were the FDA produced a regulatory amendment [205].
The application of biodegradable polymers in dental practice widely improved the clinical response of patients. This is because biodegradable polymers can be utilized as eternal or temporary prosthesis thanks to their ability to break down and be absorbed by the body without producing harmful degradation products. Moreover, they offer great potential for controlled drug delivery, wound management, dental restorations, and tissue engineering. However, the further development of the biodegradable polymers, especially in the regeneration field, requires deeper knowledge on basic tissue biology and molecular mechanisms of tissue turnover at different periods of human life and in different diseases. Without any doubt, this investigation will be the guiding thread of dental research in the next future.
There is no conflict to declare.
The authors wish to thank the Royal Society of Chemistry for permissions to reproduce Figures 3 and 4.
This work was supported by Progetto POR FESR Campania 2014/2020 "Tecnologie abilitanti per la sintesi eco-sostenibile di nuovi materiali per la restaurativa dentale – ABILTEC", Progetto PON 03 PE_00110_1/ptd1_000410 "Sviluppo di nanotecnologie Orientate alla Rigenerazione e Ricostruzione tissutale, Implantologia e Sensoristica in Odontoiatria/oculistica – SORRISO" and PRIN 2012 (prot. 201288JKYY) "Nanotecnologie per variare i programmi di sviluppo osseo nella parete vasale per la prevenzione e trattamento delle patologie associate alla calcificazione ectopica arteriosa".
Raffaele Conte, Anna Di Salle and Orsolina Petillo planned, write and revised the paper. Francesco Riccitiello, Gianfranco Peluso and Anna Calarco planned and revised the article.
[1] |
Holtfreter B, Kocher T, Hoffmann T, et al. (2010) Prevalence of periodontal disease and treatment demands based on a German dental survey (DMS IV). J Clin Periodontol 37: 211–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01517.x
![]() |
[2] | Fujita T, Yamamoto S, Ota M, et al. (2011) Coverage of gingival recession defects using guided tissue regeneration with and without adjunctive enamel matrix derivative in a dog model. Int J Periodont Rest 31: 247–253. |
[3] |
Sun HH, Qu TJ, Zhang XH, et al. (2012) Designing biomaterials for in situ periodontal tissue regeneration. Biotechnol Progr 28: 3–20. doi: 10.1002/btpr.698
![]() |
[4] | Lloyd AW (2002) Interfacial bioengineering to enhance surface biocompatibility. Med Device Technol 13: 18–21. |
[5] |
Schakenraad JM, Hardonk MJ, Feijen J, et al. (1990) Enzymatic activity toward poly(L-lactic acid) implants. J Biomed Mater Res 24: 529–545. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820240502
![]() |
[6] |
Finer Y, Santerre JP (2004) Salivary esterase activity and its association with the biodegradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 83: 22–26. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300105
![]() |
[7] |
Rokaya D, Srimaneepong V, Sapkota J, et al. (2018) Polymeric materials and films in dentistry: An overview. J Adv Res 14: 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.001
![]() |
[8] | Yuan W, Ji J, Fu J, et al. (2008) A facile method to construct hybrid multilayered films as a strong and multifunctional antibacterial coating. J Biomed Mater Res B 85: 556–563. |
[9] |
Travan A, Marsich E, Donati I, et al. (2011) Silver–polysaccharide nanocomposite antimicrobial coatings for methacrylic thermosets. Acta Biomater 7: 337–346. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.024
![]() |
[10] | Mironov V, Visconti RP, Markwald RR (2004) What is regenerative medicine? Emergence of applied stem cell and developmental biology. Expert Opin Biol Th 4: 773–781. |
[11] |
Rajeswari R, Clarisse CHN, Susan L, et al. (2012) Biomimetic surface modification of titanium surfaces for early cell capture by advanced electrospinning. Biomed Mater 7: 015001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015001
![]() |
[12] |
Riccitiello F, De Luise A, Conte R, et al. (2018) Effect of resveratrol release kinetic from electrospun nanofibers on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Eur Polym J 99: 289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.035
![]() |
[13] |
Coulembier O, Degée P, Hedrick JL, et al. (2006) From controlled ring-opening polymerization to biodegradable aliphatic polyester: Especially poly(β-malic acid) derivatives. Prog Polym Sci 31: 723–747. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.08.004
![]() |
[14] |
Maurus PB, Kaeding CC (2004) Bioabsorbable implant material review. Oper Techn Sport Med 12: 158–160. doi: 10.1053/j.otsm.2004.07.015
![]() |
[15] |
Gunatillake P, Mayadunne R, Adhikari R (2006) Recent developments in biodegradable synthetic polymers. Biotechnol Annu Rev 12: 301–347. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(06)12009-8
![]() |
[16] | Katz AR, Turner RJ (1970) Evaluation of tensile and absorption properties of polyglycolic acid sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131: 701–716. |
[17] |
Reed TM (1999) Allofix freeze-dried cortical bone pins as an alternative to synthetic absorbable polymeric pins: a preliminary study in short Z bunionectomies. J Foot Ankle Surg 38: 14–23. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(99)80083-0
![]() |
[18] | Knecht S, Erggelet C, Endres M, et al. (2007) Mechanical testing of fixation techniques for scaffold-based tissue-engineered grafts. J Biomed Mater Res B 83: 50–57. |
[19] |
Frisbie DD, Lu Y, Kawcak CE, et al. (2009) In vivo evaluation of autologous cartilage fragment-loaded scaffolds implanted into equine articular defects and compared with autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sport Med 37: 71–80. doi: 10.1177/0363546509348478
![]() |
[20] |
Xu L, Cao D, Liu W, et al. (2010) In vivo engineering of a functional tendon sheath in a hen model. Biomaterials 31: 3894–3902. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.106
![]() |
[21] |
Sayasneh A, Johnson H (2010) Risk factors for mesh erosion complicating vaginal reconstructive surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol 30: 721–724. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.501921
![]() |
[22] | Aysan E, Bektas H, Ersoz F, et al. (2010) A novel colonic anastomosis technique involving fixed polyglycolic acid mesh. Int J Clin Exp Med 3: 341–346. |
[23] | Dai T, Jiang Z, Li S, et al. (2010) Reconstruction of lymph vessel by lymphatic endothelial cells combined with polyglycolic acid scaffolds: a pilot study. J Biotechnol 150: 182–189. |
[24] |
Abbushi A, Endres M, Cabraja M, et al. (2008) Regeneration of intervertebral disc tissue by resorbable cell-free polyglycolic acid-based implants in a rabbit model of disc degeneration. Spine 33: 1527–1532. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181788760
![]() |
[25] | Ohara T, Itaya T, Usami K, et al. (2010) Evaluation of scaffold materials for tooth tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 94: 800–805. |
[26] |
Chang HH, Wang YL, Chiang YC, et al. (2014) A novel chitosan-γPGA polyelectrolyte complex hydrogel promotes early new bone formation in the alveolar socket following tooth extraction. PLoS One 9: e92362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092362
![]() |
[27] |
Middleton JC, Tipton AJ (2000) Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 21: 2335–2346. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0
![]() |
[28] |
Suuronen R, Pohjonen T, Hietanen J, et al. (1998) A 5-year in vitro and in vivo study of the biodegradation of polylactide plates. J Oral Maxil Surg 56: 604–614. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90461-X
![]() |
[29] |
Loo JS, Ooi CP, Boey FY (2005) Degradation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) by electron beam radiation. Biomaterials 26: 1359–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.001
![]() |
[30] | Shim IK, Jung MR, Kim KH, et al. (2010) Novel three-dimensional scaffolds of poly(L-lactic acid) microfibers using electrospinning and mechanical expansion: Fabrication and bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B 95: 150–160. |
[31] |
Tanaka Y, Yamaoka H, Nishizawa S, et al. (2010) The optimization of porous polymeric scaffolds for chondrocyte/atelocollagen based tissue-engineered cartilage. Biomaterials 31: 4506–4516. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.028
![]() |
[32] |
Inui A, Kokubu T, Makino T, et al. (2010) Potency of double-layered poly L-lactic acid scaffold in tissue engineering of tendon tissue. Int Orthop 34: 1327–1332. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0917-8
![]() |
[33] |
Wang HB, Mullins ME, Cregg JM, et al. (2010) Varying the diameter of aligned electrospun fibers alters neurite outgrowth and Schwann cell migration. Acta Biomater 6: 2970–2978. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.020
![]() |
[34] |
Francois S, Chakfe N, Durand B, et al. (2009) A poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibre mesh scaffold for endothelial cells on vascular prostheses. Acta Biomater 5: 2418–2428. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.013
![]() |
[35] |
Tang L, Zhao C, Xiong Y, et al. (2010) Preparation, antibacterial properties and biocompatibility studies on vancomycin-poly(D,L)-lactic loaded plates. Int Orthop 34: 755–759. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0808-z
![]() |
[36] |
Carletti E, Endogan T, Hasirci N, et al. (2011) Microfabrication of PDLLA scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen M 5: 569–577. doi: 10.1002/term.349
![]() |
[37] |
Lee SH, Kim IY, Song WS (2014) Biodegradation of polylactic acid (PLA) fibers using different enzymes. Macromol Res 22: 657–663. doi: 10.1007/s13233-014-2107-9
![]() |
[38] |
Tomlin EM, Nelson SJ, Rossmann JA (2014) Ridge preservation for implant therapy: a review of the literature. Open Dent J 8: 66–76. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010066
![]() |
[39] |
Thomas N, Sanil G, Rajmohan G, et al. (2011) Fabrication and anti-microbial evaluation of drug loaded polylactide space filler intended for ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Indian Soc Periodontol 15: 260–264. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.85671
![]() |
[40] |
Serino G, Biancu S, Iezzi G, et al. (2003) Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans. Clin Oral Implan Res 14: 651–658. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x
![]() |
[41] |
Makadia HK, Siegel SJ (2011) Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers 3: 1377–1397. doi: 10.3390/polym3031377
![]() |
[42] |
Conn Jr. J, Oyasu R, Welsh M, et al. (1974) Vicryl (polyglactin 910) synthetic absorbable sutures. Am J Surg 128: 19–23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90228-1
![]() |
[43] |
Liu J, Qiu Z, Wang S, et al. (2010) A modified double-emulsion method for the preparation of daunorubicin-loaded polymeric nanoparticle with enhanced in vitro anti-tumor activity. Biomed Mater 5: 065002. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/6/065002
![]() |
[44] |
Ye M, Kim S, Park K (2010) Issues in long-term protein delivery using biodegradable microparticles. J Control Release 146: 241–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.011
![]() |
[45] |
Jiang W, Schwendeman SP (2008) Stabilization of tetanus toxoid encapsulated in PLGA microspheres. Mol Pharmaceut 5: 808–817. doi: 10.1021/mp800027f
![]() |
[46] |
Jhunjhunwala S, Raimondi G, Thomson AW, et al. (2009) Delivery of rapamycin to dendritic cells using degradable microparticles. J Control Release 133: 191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.011
![]() |
[47] |
Vega E, Gamisans F, Garcia ML, et al. (2008) PLGA nanospheres for the ocular delivery of flurbiprofen: drug release and interactions. J Pharm Sci 97: 5306–5317. doi: 10.1002/jps.21383
![]() |
[48] |
Eperon S, Bossy-Nobs L, Petropoulos IK, et al. (2008) A biodegradable drug delivery system for the treatment of postoperative inflammation. Int J Pharmaceut 352: 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.054
![]() |
[49] |
Murata N, Takashima Y, Toyoshima K, et al. (2008) Anti-tumor effects of anti-VEGF siRNA encapsulated with PLGA microspheres in mice. J Control Release 126: 246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.11.017
![]() |
[50] | Levin BP (2013) Alveolar ridge augmentation: combining bioresorbable scaffolds with osteoinductive bone grafts in atrophic sites. A follow-up to an evolving technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34: 178–186. |
[51] | Hassan KS (2009) Autogenous bone graft combined with polylactic polyglycolic acid polymer for treatment of dehiscence around immediate dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med O 108: e19–e25. |
[52] |
Jones AA, Buser D, Schenk R, et al. (2006) The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model. J Periodontol 77: 1184–1193. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050337
![]() |
[53] |
Wu Z, Liu C, Zang G, et al. (2008) The effect of simvastatin on remodelling of the alveolar bone following tooth extraction. Int J Oral Max Surg 37: 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.06.018
![]() |
[54] |
Sousa FFO, Luzardo-Álvarez A, Pérez-Estévéz A, et al. (2010) Development of a novel AMX-loaded PLGA/zein microsphere for root canal disinfection. Biomed Mater 5: 055008. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/5/055008
![]() |
[55] |
Zhao H, Wu B, Wu H, et al. (2006) Protective immunity in rats by intranasal immunization with Streptococcus mutans glucan-binding protein D encapsulated into chitosan-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres. Biotechnol Lett 28: 1299–1304. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9086-7
![]() |
[56] |
Jamal T, Rahman A, Mirza A, et al. (2012) Formulation, antimicrobial and toxicity evaluation of bioceramic based ofloxacin loaded biodegradable microspheres for periodontal infection. Curr Drug Deliv 9: 515–526. doi: 10.2174/156720112802650644
![]() |
[57] |
Chang PC, Dovban AS, Lim LP, et al. (2013) Dual delivery of PDGF and simvastatin to accelerate periodontal regeneration in vivo. Biomaterials 34: 9990–9997. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.030
![]() |
[58] |
Brown A, Zaky S, Ray H, et al. (2015) Porous magnesium/PLGA composite scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration following tooth extraction. Acta Biomater 11: 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.008
![]() |
[59] |
Van Manen EHC, Zhang W, Walboomers XF, et al. (2014) The influence of electrospun fibre scaffold orientation and nano-hydroxyapatite content on the development of tooth bud stem cells in vitro. Odontology 102: 14–21. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0087-9
![]() |
[60] |
Shirakata Y, Nakamura T, Shinohara Y, et al. (2014) An exploratory study on the efficacy of rat dedifferentiated fat cells (rDFATs) with a poly lactic-co-glycolic acid/hydroxylapatite (PLGA/HA) composite for bone formation in a rat calvarial defect model. J Mater Sci-Mater M 25: 899–908. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5124-x
![]() |
[61] |
Marei MK, Saad MM, El-Ashwah AM, et al. (2009) Experimental formation of periodontal structure around titanium implants utilizing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 35: 106–129. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.3.106
![]() |
[62] |
Akita D, Morokuma M, Saito Y, et al. (2014) Periodontal tissue regeneration by transplantation of rat adipose-derived stromal cells in combination with PLGA-based solid scaffolds. Biomed Res 35: 91–103. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.35.91
![]() |
[63] |
Zhang H, Wang J, Ma H, et al. (2016) Bilayered PLGA/wool keratin composite membranes support periodontal regeneration in beagle dogs. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2: 2162–2175. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00357
![]() |
[64] |
Naito Y, Terukina T, Galli S, et al. (2014) The effect of simvastatin-loaded polymeric microspheres in a critical size bone defect in the rabbit calvaria. Int J Pharmaceut 461: 157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.046
![]() |
[65] |
Yonamine Y, Matsuyama T, Sonomura T, et al. (2010) Effectable application of vascular endothelial growth factor to critical sized rat calvaria defects. Oral Surg Oral Med O 109: 225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.010
![]() |
[66] | Son JS, Choi YA, Park EK, et al. (2013) Drug delivery from hydroxyapatite-coated titanium surfaces using biodegradable particle carriers. J Biomed Mater Res B 101: 247–257. |
[67] |
Wang F, Song YL, Li CX, et al. (2010) Sustained release of insulin-like growth factor-1 from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres improves osseointegration of dental implants in type 2 diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol 640: 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.024
![]() |
[68] |
Han Y, Zeng Q, Lingling E, et al. (2012) Sustained topical delivery of insulin from fibrin gel loaded with poly(lactic-co-glycolic Acid) microspheres improves the biomechanical retention of titanium implants in type 1 diabetic rats. J Oral Maxil Surg 70: 2299–2308. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.05.028
![]() |
[69] |
Gentile P, Frongia ME, Cardellach M, et al. (2015) Functionalised nanoscale coatings using layer-by-layer assembly for imparting antibacterial properties to polylactide-co-glycolide surfaces. Acta Biomater 21: 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.009
![]() |
[70] | Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKY, et al. (2005) Susceptibility of a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material to degradation. II. Gravimetric evaluation of enzymatic hydrolysis. J Endodont 31: 737–741. |
[71] |
Patlolla A, Collins G, Arinzeh TL (2010) Solvent-dependent properties of electrospun fibrous composites for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 6: 90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.028
![]() |
[72] | Nobile MR, Lucia G, Santella M, et al. (2015) Biodegradable compounds: Rheological, mechanical and thermal properties. AIP Conf Proc 1695: 020058. |
[73] |
Danhier F, Vroman B, Lecouturier N, et al. (2009) Targeting of tumor endothelium by RGD-grafted PLGA-nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel. J Control Release 140: 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.011
![]() |
[74] |
Chung S, Ingle NP, Montero GA, et al. (2010) Bioresorbable elastomeric vascular tissue engineering scaffolds via melt spinning and electrospinning. Acta Biomater 6: 1958–1967. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.007
![]() |
[75] |
Guarino V, Ambrosio L (2008) The synergic effect of polylactide fiber and calcium phosphate particle reinforcement in poly epsilon-caprolactone-based composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater 4: 1778–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.013
![]() |
[76] |
Zuo Y, Yang F, Wolke JG, et al. (2010) Incorporation of biodegradable electrospun fibers into calcium phosphate cement for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6: 1238–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.036
![]() |
[77] | Hayami JW, Surrao DC, Waldman SD, et al. (2010) Design and characterization of a biodegradable composite scaffold for ligament tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 92: 1407–1420. |
[78] |
Li WJ, Chiang H, Kuo TF, et al. (2009) Evaluation of articular cartilage repair using biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds in a swine model: a pilot study. J Tissue Eng Regen M 3: 1–10. doi: 10.1002/term.127
![]() |
[79] |
Nisbet DR, Rodda AE, Horne MK, et al. (2009) Neurite infiltration and cellular response to electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds implanted into the brain. Biomaterials 30: 4573–4580. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.011
![]() |
[80] |
Heydarkhan-Hagvall S, Schenke-Layland K, Dhanasopon AP, et al. (2008) Three-dimensional electrospun ECM-based hybrid scaffolds for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29: 2907–2914. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.034
![]() |
[81] | Huang MH, Chou AH, Lien SP, et al. (2009) Formulation and immunological evaluation of novel vaccine delivery systems based on bioresorbable poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactide-co-ε-caprolactone). J Biomed Mater Res B 90: 832–841. |
[82] | Louvrier A, Euvrard E, Nicod L, et al. (2017) Odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells from healthy and carious teeth on an original PCL-based 3D scaffold. Int Endod J 51: e252–e263. |
[83] |
Chuenjitkuntaworn B, Osathanon T, Nowwarote N, et al. (2016) The efficacy of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold in combination with mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 104: 264–271. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35558
![]() |
[84] |
Baranowska-Korczyc A, Warowicka A, Jasiurkowska-Delaporte M, et al. (2016) Antimicrobial electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds for gingival fibroblast growth. RSC Adv 6: 19647–19656. doi: 10.1039/C6RA02486F
![]() |
[85] |
He S, Timmer MD, Yaszemski MJ, et al. (2001) Synthesis of biodegradable poly(propylene fumarate) networks with poly(propylene fumarate)-diacrylate macromers as crosslinking agents and characterization of their degradation products. Polymer 42: 1251–1260. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00479-1
![]() |
[86] |
Christenson EM, Soofi W, Holm JL, et al. (2007) Biodegradable fumarate-based polyHIPEs as tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 8: 3806–3814. doi: 10.1021/bm7007235
![]() |
[87] | Hacker MC, Haesslein A, Ueda H, et al. (2009) Biodegradable fumarate-based drug-delivery systems for ophthalmic applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 88: 976–989. |
[88] |
Jayabalan M, Shalumon KT, Mitha MK, et al. (2010) Effect of hydroxyapatite on the biodegradation and biomechanical stability of polyester nanocomposites for orthopaedic applications. Acta Biomater 6: 763–775. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.015
![]() |
[89] | Mistry AS, Pham QP, Schouten C, et al. (2010) In vivo bone biocompatibility and degradation of porous fumarate-based polymer/alumoxane nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 92: 451–462. |
[90] |
Trachtenberg JE, Placone JK, Smith BT, et al. (2017) Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J Biomat Sci-Polym E 28: 532–554. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2017.1286184
![]() |
[91] | Alge DL, Bennet J, Treasure T, et al. (2012) Poly(propylene fumarate) reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 100: 1792–1802. |
[92] | Shahabi S, Rezaei Y, Moztarzadeh F, et al. (2016) In vitro degradation and bioactivity of poly(propylene fumarate)/bioactive glass sintered microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Sci Eng Compos Mater 23: 245–256. |
[93] |
Agueros M, Zabaleta V, Espuelas S, et al. (2010) Increased oral bioavailability of paclitaxel by its encapsulation through complex formation with cyclodextrins in poly(anhydride) nanoparticles. J Control Release 145: 2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.012
![]() |
[94] |
Krasko MY, Golenser J, Nyska A, et al. (2007) Gentamicin extended release from an injectable polymeric implant. J Control Release 117: 90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.10.010
![]() |
[95] |
Tamayo I, Irache JM, Mansilla C, et al. (2010) Poly(anhydride) nanoparticles act as active Th1 adjuvants through Toll-like receptor exploitation. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 1356–1362. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00164-10
![]() |
[96] |
Petersen LK, Sackett CK, Narasimhan B (2010) High-throughput analysis of protein stability in polyanhydride nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 6: 3873–3881. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.004
![]() |
[97] |
Weiner AA, Shuck DM, Bush JR, et al. (2007) In vitro degradation characteristics of photocrosslinked anhydride systems for bone augmentation applications. Biomaterials 28: 5259–5270. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.022
![]() |
[98] |
Hasturk H, Kantarci A, Ghattas M, et al. (2014) The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants and extraction sockets in minipigs: Part II: histologic and micro-CT evaluations. J Periodontol 85: 1230–1239. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.120424
![]() |
[99] | Uhrich KE (2010) Polyanhydride linkers for production of drug polymers and drug polymer compositions produced thereby. U.S. Patent. |
[100] |
Zhang Z, Kuijer R, Bulstra SK, et al. (2006) The in vivo and in vitro degradation behavior of poly(trimethylene carbonate). Biomaterials 27: 1741–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.017
![]() |
[101] |
Habraken WJ, Zhang Z, Wolke JG, et al. (2008) Introduction of enzymatically degradable poly(trimethylene carbonate) microspheres into an injectable calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials 29: 2464–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.012
![]() |
[102] |
Kluin OS, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, et al. (2009) A surface-eroding antibiotic delivery system based on poly-(trimethylene carbonate). Biomaterials 30: 4738–4742. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.012
![]() |
[103] |
Bat E, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) Biodegradable elastomeric networks: highly efficient cross-linking of poly(trimethylene carbonate) by gamma irradiation in the presence of pentaerythritol triacrylate. Biomacromolecules 11: 2692–2699. doi: 10.1021/bm1007234
![]() |
[104] |
Chen W, Meng F, Li F, et al. (2009) pH-responsive biodegradable micelles based on acid-labile polycarbonate hydrophobe: synthesis and triggered drug release. Biomacromolecules 10: 1727–1735. doi: 10.1021/bm900074d
![]() |
[105] |
Amsden BG, Timbart L, Marecak D, et al. (2010) VEGF-induced angiogenesis following localized delivery via injectable, low viscosity poly(trimethylene carbonate). J Control Release 145: 109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.029
![]() |
[106] |
Welle A, Kroger M, Doring M, et al. (2007) Electrospun aliphatic polycarbonates as tailored tissue scaffold materials. Biomaterials 28: 2211–2219. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.024
![]() |
[107] |
Suriano F, Pratt R, Tan JP, et al. (2010) Synthesis of a family of amphiphilic glycopolymers via controlled ring-opening polymerization of functionalized cyclic carbonates and their application in drug delivery. Biomaterials 31: 2637–2645. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.022
![]() |
[108] |
Pronych GJ, Sutow EJ, Sykora O (2003) Dimensional stability and dehydration of a thermoplastic polycarbonate-based and two PMMA-based denture resins. J Oral Rehabil 30: 1157–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01189.x
![]() |
[109] |
Tanimoto Y, Inami T, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2015) Preparation, mechanical, and in vitro properties of glass fiber-reinforced polycarbonate composites for orthodontic application. J Biomed Mater Res B 103: 743–750. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33245
![]() |
[110] |
Zhang W, Zhang Z, Chen S, et al. (2016) Mandibular jaw bone regeneration using human dental cell-seeded tyrosine-derived polycarbonate scaffolds. Tissue Eng A 22: 985–993. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0166
![]() |
[111] |
Yilgor I, Yilgor E (2007) Structure‐morphology-property behavior of segmented thermoplastic polyurethanes and polyureas prepared without chain extenders. Polym Rev 47: 487–510. doi: 10.1080/15583720701638260
![]() |
[112] |
Asai T, Lee MH, Arrecubieta C, et al. (2007) Cellular coating of the left ventricular assist device textured polyurethane membrane reduces adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 133: 1147–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.084
![]() |
[113] |
Uttayarat P, Perets A, Li M, et al. (2010) Micropatterning of three-dimensional electrospun polyurethane vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 6: 4229–4237. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.008
![]() |
[114] |
Backman S, Bjorling G, Johansson UB, et al. (2009) Material wear of polymeric tracheostomy tubes: a six-month study. Laryngoscope 119: 657–664. doi: 10.1002/lary.20048
![]() |
[115] |
Lavorgna M, Cerruti P, Casula G, et al. (2007) Curing characteristics and mechanical properties of carbon fiber-interlayered fabric composites based on a polyurethane matrix. Adv Polym Tech 26: 132–145. doi: 10.1002/adv.20094
![]() |
[116] |
Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, et al. (2014) Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod 44: 69–76. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
![]() |
[117] |
Mampieri G, Giancotti A (2013) Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns. Prog Orthod 14: 40–40. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-40
![]() |
[118] |
Lee JH, Cho SA (2015) Altered polyurethane cast for a partial removable dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 114: 305–306. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.011
![]() |
[119] | Selten MH, Broekema FI, Zuidema J, et al. (2013) Modified polyurethane foam as a local hemostatic agent after dental extractions. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 120: 378–382. |
[120] |
Ohta T, Tani A, Kimbara K, et al. (2005) A novel nicotinoprotein aldehyde dehydrogenase involved in polyethylene glycol degradation. Appl Microbiol Biot 68: 639–646. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-1936-z
![]() |
[121] |
Kabanov AV, Lemieux P, Vinogradov S, et al. (2002) Pluronic® block copolymers: novel functional molecules for gene therapy. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 54: 223–233. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00018-2
![]() |
[122] |
Aka-Any-Grah A, Bouchemal K, Koffi A, et al. (2010) Formulation of mucoadhesive vaginal hydrogels insensitive to dilution with vaginal fluids. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 76: 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.07.004
![]() |
[123] |
Vashi AV, Keramidaris E, Abberton KM, et al. (2008) Adipose differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using Pluronic F-127 hydrogel in vitro. Biomaterials 29: 573–579. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.017
![]() |
[124] |
Zhang X, He H, Yen C, et al. (2008) A biodegradable, immunoprotective, dual nanoporous capsule for cell-based therapies. Biomaterials 29: 4253–4259. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.032
![]() |
[125] |
Buxadera-Palomero J, Canal C, Torrent-Camarero S, et al. (2015) Antifouling coatings for dental implants: Polyethylene glycol-like coatings on titanium by plasma polymerization. Biointerphases 10: 029505. doi: 10.1116/1.4913376
![]() |
[126] |
Dabbagh A, Abu Kasim NH, Bakri MM, et al. (2014) Polyethylene-glycol coated maghemite nanoparticles for treatment of dental hypersensitivity. Mater Lett 121: 89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.120
![]() |
[127] |
Mei M, Li QL, Chu C (2016) Inhibition of cariogenic plaque formation on root surface with polydopamine-induced-polyethylene glycol coating. Materials 9: 414. doi: 10.3390/ma9060414
![]() |
[128] | Thoma DS, Jung UW, Park JY, et al. (2017) Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques. Clin Oral Implan Res 28: e76–e83. |
[129] |
Walters NJ, Xia W, Salih V, et al. (2016) Poly(propylene glycol) and urethane dimethacrylates improve conversion of dental composites and reveal complexity of cytocompatibility testing. Dent Mater 32: 264–277. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.017
![]() |
[130] |
Münchow EA, da Silva AF, da Silveira Lima G, et al. (2015) Polypropylene glycol phosphate methacrylate as an alternative acid-functional monomer on self-etching adhesives. J Dent 43: 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.005
![]() |
[131] |
Diniz IMA, Chen C, Xu X, et al. (2015) Pluronic F-127 hydrogel as a promising scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Sci-Mater M 26: 153. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5493-4
![]() |
[132] |
Mogen AB, Chen F, Ahn SJ, et al. (2015) Pluronics-formulated farnesol promotes efficient killing and demonstrates novel interactions with Streptococcus mutans biofilms. PLoS One 10: e0133886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133886
![]() |
[133] |
Ramshaw JA, Shah NK, Brodsky B (1998) Gly-X-Y tripeptide frequencies in collagen: a context for host-guest triple-helical peptides. J Struct Biol 122: 86–91. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1998.3977
![]() |
[134] |
Krane SM (2008) The importance of proline residues in the structure, stability and susceptibility to proteolytic degradation of collagens. Amino Acids 35: 703–710. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0073-2
![]() |
[135] | Yilmaz N, Inal S, Muglali M, et al. (2010) Effects of polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics. Med Oral Patol Oral 15: e526–e530. |
[136] |
Friberg O, Dahlin LG, Kallman J, et al. (2009) Collagen-gentamicin implant for prevention of sternal wound infection; long-term follow-up of effectiveness. Interact Cardiov Th 9: 454–458. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.207514
![]() |
[137] |
Holladay C, Keeney M, Greiser U, et al. (2009) A matrix reservoir for improved control of non-viral gene delivery. J Control Release 136: 220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.02.006
![]() |
[138] |
Vinas-Castells R, Holladay C, di Luca A, et al. (2009) Snail1 down-regulation using small interfering RNA complexes delivered through collagen scaffolds. Bioconjugate Chem 20: 2262–2269. doi: 10.1021/bc900241w
![]() |
[139] | Maehara H, Sotome S, Yoshii T, et al. (2010) Repair of large osteochondral defects in rabbits using porous hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/Col) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). J Orthop Res 28: 677–686. |
[140] |
Baik SH, Kim JH, Cho HH, et al. (2010) Development and analysis of a collagen-based hemostatic adhesive. J Surg Res 164: e221–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.004
![]() |
[141] |
Wang L, Stegemann JP (2010) Thermogelling chitosan and collagen composite hydrogels initiated with beta-glycerophosphate for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31: 3976–3985. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.131
![]() |
[142] | Yan LP, Wang YJ, Ren L, et al. (2010) Genipin-cross-linked collagen/chitosan biomimetic scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 95: 465–475. |
[143] |
Casper CL, Yang W, Farach-Carson MC, et al. (2007) Coating electrospun collagen and gelatin fibers with perlecan domain I for increased growth factor binding. Biomacromolecules 8: 1116–1123. doi: 10.1021/bm061003s
![]() |
[144] | Ciardelli G, Gentile P, Chiono V, et al. (2010) Enzymatically crosslinked porous composite matrices for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 92: 137–151. |
[145] |
Kim JY, Xin X, Moioli EK, et al. (2010) Regeneration of dental-pulp-like tissue by chemotaxis-induced cell homing. Tissue Eng A 16: 3023–3031. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0181
![]() |
[146] |
Tatakis DN, Promsudthi A, Wikesjö UME (1999) Devices for periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 19: 59–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00147.x
![]() |
[147] |
Chatzistavrou X, Rao RR, Caldwell DJ, et al. (2016) Collagen/fibrin microbeads as a delivery system for Ag-doped bioactive glass and DPSCs for potential applications in dentistry. J Non-Cryst Solids 432: 143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.03.024
![]() |
[148] |
Kothapalli CR, Ramamurthi A (2010) Induced elastin regeneration by chronically activated smooth muscle cells for targeted aneurysm repair. Acta Biomater 6: 170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.006
![]() |
[149] |
Mithieux SM, Rasko JE, Weiss AS (2004) Synthetic elastin hydrogels derived from massive elastic assemblies of self-organized human protein monomers. Biomaterials 25: 4921–4927. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.055
![]() |
[150] |
Kaufmann D, Weberskirch R (2006) Efficient synthesis of protein-drug conjugates using a functionalizable recombinant elastin-mimetic polypeptide. Macromol Biosci 6: 952–958. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200600117
![]() |
[151] |
Tu Y, Wise SG, Weiss AS (2010) Stages in tropoelastin coalescence during synthetic elastin hydrogel formation. Micron 41: 268–272. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2009.11.003
![]() |
[152] |
Gurumurthy B, Bierdeman PC, Janorkar AV (2016) Composition of elastin like polypeptide–collagen composite scaffold influences in vitro osteogenic activity of human adipose derived stem cells. Dent Mater 32: 1270–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.009
![]() |
[153] |
Amruthwar SS, Janorkar AV (2013) In vitro evaluation of elastin-like polypeptide–collagen composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater 29: 211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.003
![]() |
[154] |
Shaikh FM, Callanan A, Kavanagh EG, et al. (2008) Fibrin: a natural biodegradable scaffold in vascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs 188: 333–346. doi: 10.1159/000139772
![]() |
[155] | Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, et al. (2006) Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part IV: clinical effects on tissue healing. Oral Surg Oral Med O 101: e56–60. |
[156] | Li Q, Pan S, Dangaria SJ, et al. (2013) Platelet-rich fibrin promotes periodontal regeneration and enhances alveolar bone augmentation. BioMed Res Int 2013: 638043. |
[157] | Marenzi G, Riccitiello F, Tia M, et al. (2015) Influence of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in the healing of simple postextraction sockets: a split-mouth study. BioMed Res Int 2015: 369273. |
[158] | Keswani D, Pandey RK (2013) Revascularization of an immature tooth with a necrotic pulp using platelet-rich fibrin: a case report. Int Endod J 46: 1096–1104. |
[159] |
Zhao YH, Zhang M, Liu NX, et al. (2013) The combined use of cell sheet fragments of periodontal ligament stem cells and platelet-rich fibrin granules for avulsed tooth reimplantation. Biomaterials 34: 5506–5520. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.079
![]() |
[160] |
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Del Corso M, Diss A, et al. (2010) Three-dimensional architecture and cell composition of a Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin clot and membrane. J Periodontol 81: 546–555. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090531
![]() |
[161] |
Portilla-Arias JA, Camargo B, Garcia-Alvarez M, et al. (2009) Nanoparticles made of microbial poly(gamma-glutamate)s for encapsulation and delivery of drugs and proteins. J Biomat Sci Polym E 20: 1065–1079. doi: 10.1163/156856209X444420
![]() |
[162] |
Takehara M, Hibino A, Saimura M, et al. (2010) High-yield production of short chain length poly(epsilon-L-lysine) consisting of 5–20 residues by Streptomyces aureofaciens, and its antimicrobial activity. Biotechnol Lett 32: 1299–1303. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0294-9
![]() |
[163] |
Tang CK, Sheng KC, Pouniotis D, et al. (2008) Oxidized and reduced mannan mediated MUC1 DNA immunization induce effective anti-tumor responses. Vaccine 26: 3827–3834. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.008
![]() |
[164] |
Kim SS, Seo M, Chung JW, et al. (2009) Polymeric calcium phosphate cements incorporated with poly-γ-glutamic acid: Comparative study of poly-γ-glutamic acid and citric acid. J Appl Polym Sci 113: 1223–1231. doi: 10.1002/app.30037
![]() |
[165] |
Varoni E, Canciani E, Palazzo B, et al. (2015) Effect of Poly-L-Lysine coating on titanium osseointegration: from characterization to in vivo studies. J Oral Implantol 41: 626–631. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00036
![]() |
[166] | Walters NJ, Palmer G, Ashley PF, et al. (2015) Monocalcium phosphate induces greater hydroxyapatite mineral formation than tricalcium phosphate on dental composites containing ε-poly-L-lysine. TERMIS-WC 2015, Proceedings of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine International Society World Congress, Boston, MA, USA. |
[167] |
Chen L, Tian H, Chen J, et al. (2010) Multi-armed poly(L-glutamic acid)-graft-oligoethylenimine copolymers as efficient nonviral gene delivery vectors. J Gene Med 12: 64–76. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1405
![]() |
[168] | Pilbat AM, Ball V, Schaaf P, et al. (2006) Partial poly(glutamic acid) ↔ poly(aspartic acid) exchange in layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte films. Structural alterations in the three-component architectures. Langmuir 22: 5753–5759. |
[169] |
Karal-Yilmaz O, Kayaman-Apohan N, Misirli Z, et al. (2006) Synthesis and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid-co-ethylene oxide-co-aspartic acid) and its interaction with cells. J Mater Sci-Mater M 17: 213–227. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-7307-1
![]() |
[170] | Benkirane-Jessel N, Palomares CM, Fioretti F (2014) Compound comprising alpha-msh for use in endodontic regeneration. U.S. Patent. |
[171] | Osorio R, Sauro S (2015) Polyaspartic acid enhances dentine remineralization bonded with a zinc-doped Portland-based resin cement. Int Endod J 49: 874–883. |
[172] |
Wang X, Ji J (2009) Postdiffusion of oligo-peptide within exponential growth multilayer films for localized peptide delivery. Langmuir 25: 11664–11671. doi: 10.1021/la9013575
![]() |
[173] |
Pasquinelli G, Orrico C, Foroni L, et al. (2008) Mesenchymal stem cell interaction with a non-woven hyaluronan-based scaffold suitable for tissue repair. J Anat 213: 520–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00974.x
![]() |
[174] |
Temiz A, Kazikdas KC, Ergur B, et al. (2010) Esterified hyaluronic acid improves cartilage viability in experimental tracheal reconstruction with an auricular graft. Otolaryng Head Neck 143: 772–778. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.07.007
![]() |
[175] |
Grigolo B, Lisignoli G, Desando G, et al. (2009) Osteoarthritis treated with mesenchymal stem cells on hyaluronan-based scaffold in rabbit. Tissue Eng C 15: 647–658. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0569
![]() |
[176] | Pandis L, Zavan B, Abatangelo G, et al. (2010) Hyaluronan-based scaffold for in vivo regeneration of the rat vena cava: Preliminary results in an animal model. J Biomed Mater Res A 93: 1289–1296. |
[177] |
Zavan B, Abatangelo G, Mazzoleni F, et al. (2008) New 3D hyaluronan-based scaffold for in vitro reconstruction of the rat sciatic nerve. Neurol Res 30: 190–196. doi: 10.1179/174313208X281082
![]() |
[178] |
El-Sayed KMF, Dahaba MA, Aboul-Ela S, et al. (2012) Local application of hyaluronan gel in conjunction with periodontal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 16: 1229–1236. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0630-z
![]() |
[179] |
Gontiya G, Galgali SR (2012) Effect of hyaluronan on periodontitis: A clinical and histological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 16: 184–192. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99260
![]() |
[180] |
Chrepa V, Austah O, Diogenes A (2017) Evaluation of a commercially available hyaluronic acid hydrogel (restylane) as injectable scaffold for dental pulp regeneration: an in vitro evaluation. J Endodont 43: 257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.026
![]() |
[181] |
Ferroni L, Gardin C, Sivolella S, et al. (2015) A hyaluronan-based scaffold for the in vitro construction of dental pulp-like tissue. Int J Mol Sci 16: 4666. doi: 10.3390/ijms16034666
![]() |
[182] |
Tan L, Wang J, Yin S, et al. (2015) Regeneration of dentin-pulp-like tissue using an injectable tissue engineering technique. RSC Adv 5: 59723–59737. doi: 10.1039/C5RA06481C
![]() |
[183] |
Xia W, Liu P, Liu J (2008) Advance in chitosan hydrolysis by non-specific cellulases. Bioresource Technol 99: 6751–6762. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.011
![]() |
[184] |
Li DH, Liu LM, Tian KL, et al. (2007) Synthesis, biodegradability and cytotoxicity of water-soluble isobutylchitosan. Carbohyd Polym 67: 40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.022
![]() |
[185] |
Park CJ, Gabrielson NP, Pack DW, et al. (2009) The effect of chitosan on the migration of neutrophil-like HL60 cells, mediated by IL-8. Biomaterials 30: 436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.060
![]() |
[186] |
Burkatovskaya M, Tegos GP, Swietlik E, et al. (2006) Use of chitosan bandage to prevent fatal infections developing from highly contaminated wounds in mice. Biomaterials 27: 4157–4164. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.028
![]() |
[187] | Wu L, Li H, Li S, et al. (2010) Composite fibrous membranes of PLGA and chitosan prepared by coelectrospinning and coaxial electrospinning. J Biomed Mater Res A 92: 563–574. |
[188] |
Azab AK, Orkin B, Doviner V, et al. (2006) Crosslinked chitosan implants as potential degradable devices for brachytherapy: in vitro and in vivo analysis. J Control Release 111: 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.014
![]() |
[189] |
Wang J, Feng SS, Wang S, et al. (2010) Evaluation of cationic nanoparticles of biodegradable copolymers as siRNA delivery system for hepatitis B treatment. Int J Pharmaceut 400: 194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.08.026
![]() |
[190] |
Sarukawa J, Takahashi M, Abe M, et al. (2011) Effects of chitosan-coated fibers as a scaffold for three-dimensional cultures of rabbit fibroblasts for ligament tissue engineering. J Biomat Sci Polym E 22: 717–732. doi: 10.1163/092050610X491067
![]() |
[191] |
Busscher HJ, Engels E, Dijkstra RJB, et al. (2008) Influence of a chitosan on oral bacterial adhesion and growth in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 116: 493–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00568.x
![]() |
[192] |
Barreras US, Mendez FT, Martinez RE, et al. (2016) Chitosan nanoparticles enhance the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine in collagen membranes used for periapical guided tissue regeneration. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 58: 1182–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.085
![]() |
[193] | Elsaka SE (2012) Antibacterial activity and adhesive properties of a chitosan-containing dental adhesive. Quintessence Int 43: 603–613. |
[194] |
Mota J, Yu N, Caridade SG, et al. (2012) Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticle composite membranes for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater 8: 4173–4180. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.040
![]() |
[195] | Tan CS, Jejurikar A, Rai B, et al. (2009) Encapsulation of a glycosaminoglycan in hydroxyapatite/alginate capsules. J Biomed Mater Res A 91: 866–877. |
[196] |
Liu XY, Nothias JM, Scavone A, et al. (2010) Biocompatibility investigation of polyethylene glycol and alginate-poly-L-lysine for islet encapsulation. ASAIO J 56: 241–245. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181d7b8e3
![]() |
[197] |
Giovagnoli S, Tsai T, DeLuca PP (2010) Formulation and release behavior of doxycycline-alginate hydrogel microparticles embedded into pluronic F127 thermogels as a potential new vehicle for doxycycline intradermal sustained delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 11: 212–220. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9361-8
![]() |
[198] |
Jay SM, Shepherd BR, Andrejecsk JW, et al. (2010) Dual delivery of VEGF and MCP-1 to support endothelial cell transplantation for therapeutic vascularization. Biomaterials 31: 3054–3062. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.014
![]() |
[199] |
Qi J, Chen A, You H, et al. (2011) Proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of CD105-positive enriched rat synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Biomed Mater 6: 015006. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015006
![]() |
[200] |
Meng X, Li P, Wei Q, et al. (2011) pH sensitive alginate-chitosan hydrogel beads for carvedilol delivery. Pharm Dev Technol 16: 22–28. doi: 10.3109/10837450903479947
![]() |
[201] |
Wittmer CR, Phelps JA, Lepus CM, et al. (2008) Multilayer nanofilms as substrates for hepatocellular applications. Biomaterials 29: 4082–4090. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.027
![]() |
[202] |
Lee JW, Park YJ, Lee SJ, et al. (2010) The effect of spacer arm length of an adhesion ligand coupled to an alginate gel on the control of fibroblast phenotype. Biomaterials 31: 5545–5551. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.063
![]() |
[203] |
Moshaverinia A, Chen C, Xu X, et al. (2014) Bone regeneration potential of stem cells derived from periodontal ligament or gingival tissue sources encapsulated in RGD-modified alginate scaffold. Tissue Eng A 20: 611–621. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0408
![]() |
[204] |
Srinivasan S, Jayasree R, Chennazhi KP, et al. (2012) Biocompatible alginate/nano bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for periodontal tissue regeneration. Carbohyd Polym 87: 274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.058
![]() |
[205] |
Mattamal GJ (2008) US FDA perspective on the regulations of medical-grade polymers: cyanoacrylate polymer medical device tissue adhesives. Expert Rev Med Devic 5: 41–49. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.1.41
![]() |
1. | Irene Bonadies, Francesca Di Cristo, Anna Valentino, Gianfranco Peluso, Anna Calarco, Anna Di Salle, pH-Responsive Resveratrol-Loaded Electrospun Membranes for the Prevention of Implant-Associated Infections, 2020, 10, 2079-4991, 1175, 10.3390/nano10061175 | |
2. | Prasanna Kadambi, Pranay Luniya, Pankaj Dhatrak, Current advancements in polymer/polymer matrix composites for dental implants: A systematic review, 2021, 22147853, 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.396 | |
3. | Maji Jose, Vrinda Rajagopal, Finosh G. Thankam, 2021, 9780128210857, 169, 10.1016/B978-0-12-821085-7.00009-9 | |
4. | S.C. Onwubu, P.S. Mdluli, S. Singh, S. Thakur, 2021, 9780128204849, 77, 10.1016/B978-0-12-820484-9.00003-9 | |
5. | Archita Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Mehta, Ashok Kumar, Sneha Singh, Advent of phytobiologics and nano-interventions for bone remodeling: a comprehensive review, 2023, 43, 0738-8551, 142, 10.1080/07388551.2021.2010031 | |
6. | Mariana Prodana, Andrei Bogdan Stoian, Cristian Burnei, Daniela Ionita, Innovative Coatings of Metallic Alloys Used as Bioactive Surfaces in Implantology: A Review, 2021, 11, 2079-6412, 649, 10.3390/coatings11060649 | |
7. | K.C. Pallavi, Arun M. Isloor, Lakshmi Nidhi Rao, 2022, 9781119904908, 261, 10.1002/9781119905301.ch10 | |
8. | Diana Fernández, Liliana Jiménez, Nuevas tendencias de andamios en los procedimientos regenerativos endodónticos. Revisión bibliográfica, 2021, 22, 2665-0193, 65, 10.54139/odous.v22i1.83 | |
9. | Anna Paradowska-Stolarz, Mieszko Wieckiewicz, Artur Owczarek, Joanna Wezgowiec, Natural Polymers for the Maintenance of Oral Health: Review of Recent Advances and Perspectives, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 10337, 10.3390/ijms221910337 | |
10. | Ningjing Cai, Applications of Polymers for Tissue Regeneration in Medical Treatment, 2022, 26, 2791-0210, 238, 10.54097/hset.v26i.3980 | |
11. | Linying Li, Christine Areson, Ariane van der Straten, Leah M. Johnson, Effects of Polymer Blending on the Performance of a Subcutaneous Biodegradable Implant for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 6529, 10.3390/ijms22126529 | |
12. | Mohammad Samiei, Mahdieh Alipour, Khadijeh Khezri, Yalda Rahbar Saadat, Haleh Forouhandeh, Elaheh Dalir Abdolahinia, Sepideh Zununi Vahed, Simin Sharifi, Solmaz Maleki Dizaj, Application of Collagen and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Regenerative Dentistry, 2022, 17, 1574888X, 606, 10.2174/1574888X17666211220100521 | |
13. | S.C. Onwubu, S.C. Okonkwo, M.U. Makgobole, P.S. Mdluli, 2023, 9780323916776, 331, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91677-6.00030-1 | |
14. | Alina Ioana Ardelean, Madalina Florina Dragomir, Marioara Moldovan, Codruta Sarosi, Gertrud Alexandra Paltinean, Emoke Pall, Lucian Barbu Tudoran, Ioan Petean, Liviu Oana, In Vitro Study of Composite Cements on Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Palatal Origin, 2023, 24, 1422-0067, 10911, 10.3390/ijms241310911 | |
15. | Büşra Öztürk, Aysu Aydınoğlu, Afife Binnaz Yoruç Hazar, 2023, 9780128237977, 527, 10.1016/B978-0-12-823797-7.00020-4 | |
16. | Abdullah Alsalhi, Applications of selected polysaccharides and proteins in dentistry: A review, 2024, 01418130, 129215, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129215 | |
17. | Ali I. Al‐Mosawi, Shaymaa Abbas Abdulsada, Biopolymer‐based coatings for anti‐corrosion of Ti‐alloys used in biomedical applications: A review, 2024, 0032-3888, 10.1002/pen.26681 | |
18. | Stanley C. Onwubu, Chibuzor Stellamaria Okonkwo, Mokgadi Ursula Makgobole, Phumlane Selby Mdluli, 2024, 9781119865025, 459, 10.1002/9781119865452.ch18 | |
19. | Cristiano C. Jayme, Daniela S. Fernandes, Flávia S. Matsuo, Leonardo B. de Paula, Mariana K. Osako, Antonio C. Tedesco, Improvement of polycaprolactone and polyethylene glycol flexible polymeric film enhances bone volume and interconnectivity in bone lesions through transport of mesenchymal stem cells differentiated to osteoblasts, 2024, 0021-8995, 10.1002/app.55945 | |
20. | Alina Ioana Ardelean, Sorin Marian Marza, Andrada Negoescu, Madalina Florina Dragomir, Codruta Sarosi, Marioara Moldovan, Razvan Ene, Liviu Oana, Assessing Biocompatibility of Composite Cements by Peri/Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Implantation in Rats, 2024, 12, 2227-9059, 1718, 10.3390/biomedicines12081718 | |
21. | Alina Ioana Ardelean, Sorin Marian Marza, Madalina Florina Dragomir, Andrada Negoescu, Codruta Sarosi, Cristiana Stefania Novac, Cosmin Pestean, Marioara Moldovan, Liviu Oana, The Potential of Composite Cements for Wound Healing in Rats, 2024, 11, 2306-5354, 837, 10.3390/bioengineering11080837 | |
22. | Ye Feng, Hong-Peng Li, Optimizing collagen-based biomaterials for periodontal regeneration: clinical opportunities and challenges, 2024, 12, 2296-4185, 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1469733 | |
23. | Fabrizia Sepe, Anna Valentino, Loredana Marcolongo, Orsolina Petillo, Raffaele Conte, Sabrina Margarucci, Gianfranco Peluso, Anna Calarco, Marine-Derived Polysaccharide Hydrogels as Delivery Platforms for Natural Bioactive Compounds, 2025, 26, 1422-0067, 764, 10.3390/ijms26020764 | |
24. | Marcin Mikulewicz, Katarzyna Chojnacka, Valorization of crop by-products into bio-based dental materials: advancements and prospects, 2025, 17, 1758-5082, 022006, 10.1088/1758-5090/ada736 | |
25. | Rathna Piriyanga, Manish Ranjan, Anand Sherwood, Mohammad Fareed, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Effect of allicin-incorporated graphene oxide hydrogel on dentin microhardness, 2025, 25, 1472-6831, 10.1186/s12903-025-05870-1 |
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Polyesters (PE) | (Polyglycolide or poly-glycolic acid) (PGA) | Tooth bud-like structures [25]; Fleece scaffold to counteract the postoperative apical growth of epithelium on teeth [26] |
Polylactide (PLA) | Ridge and socket preservation [39]; Space fillers to promote regeneration and maintenance of original socket dimensions [40]; Prevention of alveolar bone resorption [38] | |
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) | PLGA/hydroxyapatite scaffolds [59,60]; Scaffolds with mesenchymal stem cells or dental pulp stem cells against maxillary sinus augmentation [61]; Scaffold with stromal cells to regenerate bones, periodontal ligaments and cementum layers [62]; Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/wool keratin (WK) membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) [63]; Microspheres delivering amoxicillin [54]; Microspheres with hydroxyapatite and ofloxacin against E. coli [56]; PDLLA–PLGA microparticles with different applications in periodontal apparatus in rats maxillae [57]; Microspheres containing simvastatin [64], endothelial growth factors [65] and dexamethasone [66]; Microparticles loaded growth factors [67] and insulin [68] to improve titanium implant | |
Polycaprolactone (PCL) | Scaffold for DPSCs differentiation [82]; 3D-polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold for different mesenchymal stem cells [83]; Electrospun materials in three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to reduce dental caries pathogen [84] | |
Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) | Reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites [91]; Bioactive glass composite scaffolds [92] | |
Polyanhydrides (PAN) | The device around dental implants and for extraction sockets [98]; Polymeric drug delivery systems for oral pathologies [99] | |
Polycarbonates (PC) | Thermoplastic polycarbonate denture base resin [108]; Glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) wires of polycarbonate and E-glass fiber [109]; Tyrosine-derived polycarbonate polymer scaffolds of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) to support alveolar jaw bone repair and regeneration [110] | |
Polyurethanes (PUR) | Device for arch models [116]; Substitutes of braces for removable dental aligner restorative treatments [117]; Partial removable dental prosthesis [118]; Local hemostatic agent after dental extractions [119] |
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Synthetic Polyethers | Synthetically-derived polyethers (PETH) | Coating on titanium dental implants [125]; Coatings on maghemite nanoparticles for treating dental hypersensitivity [126]; Hydroxyapatite disks with polydopamine-induced polyethylene glycol coating against a multi-species cariogenic biofilm [127]; Polyethylene glycol hydrogel with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate for guided bone regeneration procedures [128]; Poly(propylene glycol) as dental composites [129]; Self-etch adhesive system for the enamel based on acidic monomers of polypropylene glycol phosphate [130]; Pluronic F-127 hydrogels as scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells [131]; Pluronic as drug delivery platform for the prevention and treatment of pathogenic plaque biofilms [132] |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Collagen | Scaffolds loaded with different growth factors for regenerating dental-pulp-like tissue [145]; Collagen-based barrier membranes for periodontal and implant therapy [146]; Collagen/fibrin microbeads as a delivery system for Ag-doped bioactive glass and DPSCs [147] |
Elastin | Scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation [152] and for the treatment of alveolar bone loss [153] | |
Fibrin | Scaffold for dental pulp revascularization procedures [158]; Healing biomaterial scaffold for bone and soft tissue regeneration [159]; Device to promote periodontal wound healing and regeneration [160] | |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Natural Poly(amino acids) | Polymeric calcium phosphate cements incorporated with poly-γ-glutamic acid [164]; Poly(L-lysine) coatings on titanium scaffolds [165]; Composites containing Poly(L-lysine) to prevent recurrent caries and restoration failures [166] |
Synthetic poly(amino acids) | Poly(L-glutamic acid) based compound for use in endodontic regeneration and for the treatment of dental inflammatory diseases [170]; Zinc-doped Portland-based resinous sealing cement linked with poly(aspartic acid) for dentine remineralization[171] | |
Polysaccharides | Hyaluronic acid (HA) | Hyaluronan gel for local application in surgery procedure [178] and in chronic periodontitis [179]; Restylane for endodontic treatment [180]; Hyaluronan scaffolds for regenerative procedure [181]; Injectable tissue engineering composite of hyaluronic acid gel, tooth bud-derived dental mesenchymal cells and transforming growth factor-b1 [182] |
Chitosan (CS) | Chitosan pellicles for the study of bacterial adhesion [191]; Chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers to enhance antibacterial effect [192]; Chitosan-based dental adhesives [193]; Chitosan combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles (CHT/BG-NP) for periodontium regeneration [194] | |
Alginate | RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid tripeptide)-modified useful in oral and maxillofacial surgery [203]; Nano bioactive glass ceramic particles (nBGC) incorporated in alginate composite scaffold for periodontal tissue regeneration [204] |
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Polyesters (PE) | (Polyglycolide or poly-glycolic acid) (PGA) | Tooth bud-like structures [25]; Fleece scaffold to counteract the postoperative apical growth of epithelium on teeth [26] |
Polylactide (PLA) | Ridge and socket preservation [39]; Space fillers to promote regeneration and maintenance of original socket dimensions [40]; Prevention of alveolar bone resorption [38] | |
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) | PLGA/hydroxyapatite scaffolds [59,60]; Scaffolds with mesenchymal stem cells or dental pulp stem cells against maxillary sinus augmentation [61]; Scaffold with stromal cells to regenerate bones, periodontal ligaments and cementum layers [62]; Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/wool keratin (WK) membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) [63]; Microspheres delivering amoxicillin [54]; Microspheres with hydroxyapatite and ofloxacin against E. coli [56]; PDLLA–PLGA microparticles with different applications in periodontal apparatus in rats maxillae [57]; Microspheres containing simvastatin [64], endothelial growth factors [65] and dexamethasone [66]; Microparticles loaded growth factors [67] and insulin [68] to improve titanium implant | |
Polycaprolactone (PCL) | Scaffold for DPSCs differentiation [82]; 3D-polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold for different mesenchymal stem cells [83]; Electrospun materials in three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to reduce dental caries pathogen [84] | |
Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) | Reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites [91]; Bioactive glass composite scaffolds [92] | |
Polyanhydrides (PAN) | The device around dental implants and for extraction sockets [98]; Polymeric drug delivery systems for oral pathologies [99] | |
Polycarbonates (PC) | Thermoplastic polycarbonate denture base resin [108]; Glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) wires of polycarbonate and E-glass fiber [109]; Tyrosine-derived polycarbonate polymer scaffolds of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) to support alveolar jaw bone repair and regeneration [110] | |
Polyurethanes (PUR) | Device for arch models [116]; Substitutes of braces for removable dental aligner restorative treatments [117]; Partial removable dental prosthesis [118]; Local hemostatic agent after dental extractions [119] |
Materials | Classification | Dental application (Refs.) |
Synthetic Polyethers | Synthetically-derived polyethers (PETH) | Coating on titanium dental implants [125]; Coatings on maghemite nanoparticles for treating dental hypersensitivity [126]; Hydroxyapatite disks with polydopamine-induced polyethylene glycol coating against a multi-species cariogenic biofilm [127]; Polyethylene glycol hydrogel with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate for guided bone regeneration procedures [128]; Poly(propylene glycol) as dental composites [129]; Self-etch adhesive system for the enamel based on acidic monomers of polypropylene glycol phosphate [130]; Pluronic F-127 hydrogels as scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells [131]; Pluronic as drug delivery platform for the prevention and treatment of pathogenic plaque biofilms [132] |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Collagen | Scaffolds loaded with different growth factors for regenerating dental-pulp-like tissue [145]; Collagen-based barrier membranes for periodontal and implant therapy [146]; Collagen/fibrin microbeads as a delivery system for Ag-doped bioactive glass and DPSCs [147] |
Elastin | Scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation [152] and for the treatment of alveolar bone loss [153] | |
Fibrin | Scaffold for dental pulp revascularization procedures [158]; Healing biomaterial scaffold for bone and soft tissue regeneration [159]; Device to promote periodontal wound healing and regeneration [160] | |
Proteins and Poly(Amino Acids) | Natural Poly(amino acids) | Polymeric calcium phosphate cements incorporated with poly-γ-glutamic acid [164]; Poly(L-lysine) coatings on titanium scaffolds [165]; Composites containing Poly(L-lysine) to prevent recurrent caries and restoration failures [166] |
Synthetic poly(amino acids) | Poly(L-glutamic acid) based compound for use in endodontic regeneration and for the treatment of dental inflammatory diseases [170]; Zinc-doped Portland-based resinous sealing cement linked with poly(aspartic acid) for dentine remineralization[171] | |
Polysaccharides | Hyaluronic acid (HA) | Hyaluronan gel for local application in surgery procedure [178] and in chronic periodontitis [179]; Restylane for endodontic treatment [180]; Hyaluronan scaffolds for regenerative procedure [181]; Injectable tissue engineering composite of hyaluronic acid gel, tooth bud-derived dental mesenchymal cells and transforming growth factor-b1 [182] |
Chitosan (CS) | Chitosan pellicles for the study of bacterial adhesion [191]; Chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers to enhance antibacterial effect [192]; Chitosan-based dental adhesives [193]; Chitosan combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles (CHT/BG-NP) for periodontium regeneration [194] | |
Alginate | RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid tripeptide)-modified useful in oral and maxillofacial surgery [203]; Nano bioactive glass ceramic particles (nBGC) incorporated in alginate composite scaffold for periodontal tissue regeneration [204] |