Citation: Djalal Trache. Nanocellulose as a promising sustainable material for biomedical applications[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(2): 201-205. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.2.201
[1] | Chunsheng Wen, Xiaojiao Yu, Wei Zeng, Shan Zhao, Lin Wang, Guangchao Wan, Shicheng Huang, Hannah Grover, Zi Chen . Mechanical behaviors and biomedical applications of shape memory materials: A review. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(4): 559-590. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.559 |
[2] | P. Sagar, A. Handa . A comprehensive review of recent progress in fabrication of magnesium base composites by friction stir processing technique—A review. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 684-704. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.684 |
[3] | Dolores Esquivel, Pascal Van Der Voort, Francisco J. Romero-Salguero . Designing advanced functional periodic mesoporous organosilicas for biomedical applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2014, 1(1): 70-86. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2014.1.70 |
[4] | Loh Guan Hong, Nor Yuliana Yuhana, Engku Zaharah Engku Zawawi . Review of bioplastics as food packaging materials. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(2): 166-184. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021012 |
[5] | Timothy K. Mulenga, Albert U. Ude, Chinnasamy Vivekanandhan . Concise review on the mechanical characteristics of hybrid natural fibres with filler content. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 650-664. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.650 |
[6] | Sekhar Chandra Ray . Possible magnetic performances of graphene-oxide and it's composites: A brief review. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 767-818. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023043 |
[7] | Hidayah Mohd Ali Piah, Mohd Warikh Abd Rashid, Umar Al-Amani Azlan, Maziati Akmal Mohd Hatta . Potassium sodium niobate (KNN) lead-free piezoceramics: A review of phase boundary engineering based on KNN materials. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 835-861. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023045 |
[8] | João E. Ribeiro, Hernani Lopes, Pedro Martins, Manuel Braz-César . Mechanical analysis of PDMS material using biaxial test. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(1): 97-110. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.1.97 |
[9] | Bindusri Nair, B. Geetha Priyadarshini . Process, structure, property and applications of metallic glasses. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1022-1053. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1022 |
[10] | Hang Meng, Shihao Huang, Yifeng Jiang . The role of oxygen vacancies on resistive switching properties of oxide materials. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 665-683. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.665 |
In the recent few years, materials derived from natural renewable resources such as cellulose, chitosan, alginate, starch, collagen, elastin and gelatin have attracted much attention in various biomedical applications including scaffolds for tissue engineering, medical implants, vascular grafts, drug delivery, cancer targeting, cornea replacement, and biological detections [1,2,3]. Cellulose, a fascinating biopolymer, is by far the most abundant organic compound produced in the biosphere. It is biosynthesized by a variety of living organisms ranging from lower to higher plants, sea animals, bacteria and fungi. It is considered as an inexhaustive source of feedstock for the increasing demand for biocompatible and environmental friendly materials, products and devices. It is regularly regenerated by nature in relatively short period of time, where the bioproduction is estimated to be over 7.5 × 1010 metric tons annually [4,5]. Cellulose is commonly produced with a desired size by the top-down enzymatic, mechanical and/or chemical treatments of cellulosic precursors, in which cotton, wood, annual plants or other agricultural residues can be used. In contrast, cellulose can be obtained by a bottom-up approach, where cellulose is biosynthesized from glucose using the direct action of specific bacterial strains (e.g., K. xylinus) [6,7]. Owing to its physicochemical properties, renewability, biocompatibility, biodegradability, cellulose has served in a variety of applications during the past decades and continuously shows potential after adequate treatments (e.g., hydrolysis) or surface functionalization (e.g., grafting) [6,8], in several new applications such as electronic equipment, chemicals, automotive, spacecraft, energy storage in batteries and supercapacitors, and medical to cite a few [8]. Various suitable treatments have been developed to produce nanoscale cellulose [7]. Currently, the study of nanocellulose, material having at least one dimension in the nano-size (<100 nm), has attracted tremendous level of attention as revealed by the increasing number of scientific contributions and industrial investments in several fields [7,9,10]. The three-dimensional hierarchical structures that compose these cellulose nanofibers at different scales, the combination of the physicochemical properties of cellulose, together with the various advantages of nanomaterials (e.g., a high specific surface area, aspect ratio) open new opportunities in several fields, ranging from electronics to medical applications. These nanoscale celluloses have unique properties including high elastic modulus, dimensional stability, low thermal expansion coefficient, outstanding reinforcing potential, hydrogen-bonding capacity and eco-friendliness [7,9,10]. Nanocelluloses can be devided in numerous main categories: cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), amorphous nanocellulose (ANC), Cellulose nanoyarn (CNY) and bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) [11]. Different approaches have been developed to produce nanoscale cellulose from several natural sources resulting in particles with different physicochemical and mechanical properties, crystallinities and surface chemistries. The key parameters of various nanocelluloses are displayed in Table 1 [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Terminology and nomenclature of nanocellulose | Typical sources | Approximate dimensions | Advantageous properties |
Cellulose nanocrystals, nanocrystalline cellulose, cellulose nanocrystals | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 4–70 nm in width; 100–6000 nm in length | Low density, low coefficient of thermal expansion, high tensile strength, high surface area, elongated morphology, ease of bioconjugation |
Cellulose nanofibril, nanofibrillar cellulose, nanofbrillated cellulose | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 20–100 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | Large specific area, significant barrier, mechanical and colloidal properties, low density |
Bacterial nanocellulose, microbial nanocellulose | Low molecular weight sugars | 10–50 nm in width; > 1000 nm in length | Unique nanostructure, purity, higher-dimensional stability, greater mechanical strength, greater capacity to hold water |
Amorphous cellulose | Wood pulp, cotton | 20–120 nm in width; 50–120 nm in length | Increased content of functional groups and high sorption ability |
Cellulose nanoyarn | Cellulose and cellulose derivatives | 100–1000 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | High surface area, high blotting ability |
The most important methodology to produce CNC is commonly based on acid hydrolysis, but currently several other procedures have been established [7]. These treatments can eliminate the disordered (amorphous) domains of purified cellulose fibers leaving behind the crystalline regions. The obtained CNC consists of elongated, cylindrical and rod like particles with widths and length of 4–70 nm and between 100 nm and several micrometers [12]. CNF, however, are usually obtained by delamination of cellulosic pulps through mechanical or combined treatments [9]. These nanofibers are flexible and have entangled network structure with a diameter of approximately 1–100 nm, and consisting of alternating crystalline and amorphous regions. More recently, many research works have focused on optimizing processes to lower energy consumption and other costs, and to improve quality, consistency, and yields [9]. On the other hand, BNC is typically obtained from bacteria (mainly Komagataeibacter xylinus), as a separate molecule and does not necessitate processing to eliminate contaminates. In the biosynthesis of BNC, the glucose chains are introduced inside the bacteria body and expelled out through minor pores existing on the cell wall. A 20–100 nm ribbon-shaped nanofibers with micrometer lengths, entangled to form stable network structures. BNC has opened several new applications such as immobilization of enzymes, bacteria and fungi, tissues engineering, heart valve prosthesis, artificial blood vessels, bone, cartilage, cornea and skin, and dental root treatment [10,15]. Another category, ANC, can be formed through acid hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose with subsequent ultrasound disintegration [11]. The prepared particles have spherical to elliptical shapes with diameters ranging from 80 to 120 nm, depending on the cellulose feedstock, isolation procedure and extraction conditions. Because of its amorphous structure, ANC exhibits specific characteristics, such as enhanced sorption, high accessibility, and increased functional group content. The main use of ANC is as carries for bioactive substances and thickening agent in different aqueous systems. CNY remains the less studied cellulosic nanofibers. It is commonly manufactured by electrospinning of a solution containing cellulose or cellulose derivative [11]. The produced eloctrospun nanofibers display diameters ranging from 100 to 1000 nm. CNY can be employed to create new types of wound dressings [16].
Cellulosic nanofibers show great promise as a cost-effective advanced nanomaterial for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications owing to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cytotoxicity, high sorption and absorption ability, porosity, small dimensions, a variety of shapes and enhanced specific surface, surface chemistry, rheology, crystallinity, self-assembly, high thermal stability and desirable mechanical properties. They exhibit high chemical resistance to dilute solutions of acids and alkalis, organic solvents, proteolytic enzymes and antioxidants as well [8,11,17]. These applications can include medical implants, tissue engineering, drug delivery, wound healing, cardiovascular applications, and diagnostics [18]. Emerging fields being developed to use nanocelluloses and their composites in novel ways in biomedical applications such as 3D printing and magnetically responsive materials are currently until investigation [1]. Moreover, with their chemical functionality, cellulose nanofibers can be easily modified to yield useful products. Covalent modifications such as esterification, oxidation, eherification, silylation and polymer grafting, as well as non-covalent binding are suggested in the literature in order to get more interesting properties and increase the number of applications [1,2,18,19,20,21]. These properties are useful in scaffold design by improving mechanical properties, cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and cellular patterning, where various shapes can be obtained. Another hot topic is the application of cellulosic nanofibers materials for drug delivery in the form of tablet coating, membranes or bionanocomposite delivery systems. On the other hand, the production of cellulosic nanofibers aerogels with porous structure have demonstrated the potential for wound dressing and scaffolds. Fluorescent labeling of cellulosic nanofibers with various fluorophores is also of potential interest in bio-imaging, targeting and sensing uses.
In summary, cellulosic nanofibers-based materials are now recognized as unique materials that can be employed to produce exceptional films, composites and gels that show interesting features as an alternative to petroleum-based materials with environmentally friendly and renewable characteristics. It is revealed that various nanocellulose-based materials and composites hold great promise in several biomedical applications. Even though various cellulose nanofibers have been demonstrated as nongenotoxic and noncytotoxic, further studies are required to completely address such issue. Chemical modification of the cellulosic structure to improve interactions with living tissues could enlarge the utilization of nanocelluloses in biomedical devices tremendously. However, the assessment of the potential risks attributed to this chemical modification is also needed, since each modification could result in drastic behavioral changes in cell–material interactions. Clearly, despite the significant developments concerning biomedical cellulose nanofibers-based materials, this area is still promising and intensive investigations necessitate to be performed. As materials science continues to rapidly develop in biomedical field, cellulose nanofibers may provide a promising solution in the future to overcome some of the insurmountable challenges of biomedical materials.
The author gratefully acknowledges the Ecole Militaire Polytechnique for the necessary facilities and encouragement for the accomplishment of this work.
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
Dumanli AG (2017) Nanocellulose and its composites for biomedical applications. Curr Med Chem 24: 512–528. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666161014124008
![]() |
[2] | Jofri M, Foster EJ (2015) Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132: 41719–41737. |
[3] |
Babu RP, O'connor K, Seeram R (2013) Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog Biomater 2: 8–23. doi: 10.1186/2194-0517-2-8
![]() |
[4] | Trache D (2017) Microcrystalline cellulose and related polymer composites: synthesis, characterization and properties, In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Kessler MR, Handbook of Composites from Renewable Materials, Beverly: Scrivener Publishing LLC, 61–92. |
[5] |
Trache D, Khimeche K, Mezroua A, et al. (2016) Physicochemical properties of microcrystalline nitrocellulose from Alfa grass fibres and its thermal stability. J Therm Anal Calorim 124: 1485–1496. doi: 10.1007/s10973-016-5293-1
![]() |
[6] |
Trache D, Hussin MH, Chuin CT, et al. (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose: Isolation, characterization and bio-composites application-A review. Int J Biol Macromol 93: 789–804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.056
![]() |
[7] |
Trache D, Hussin MH, Haafiz MM, et al. (2017) Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9: 1763–1786. doi: 10.1039/C6NR09494E
![]() |
[8] | Thakur VK (2015) Nanocellulose Polymer Nanocomposites:Fundamentals and Applications, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. |
[9] |
Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 93: 2–25. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016
![]() |
[10] |
Ullah H, Wahid F, Santos HA, et al. (2016) Advanced in biomedical and pharmaceutical applicatins of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 150: 330–352. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.029
![]() |
[11] | Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Thomas S, et al. (2017) Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. |
[12] | George J, Sabapathi SN (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 8: 45–54. |
[13] |
Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, et al. (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: strcture, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40: 3941–3994. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00108b
![]() |
[14] |
Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, et al. (2011) Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Edit 50: 5438–5466. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001273
![]() |
[15] |
Jozala AF, de Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes AM, et al. (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 2063–2072. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7243-4
![]() |
[16] | Grumezescu A (2016) Fabrication and Self-Assembly of Nanobiomaterials, Application of nanobiomaterials, Oxford: Elsevier Inc. |
[17] |
Xue Y, Mou Z, Xiao H (2017) Nanocellulose as a sustainable biomass material: structure, properties, present status and future prospects in biomedical applications. Nanoscale 9: 14758–14781. doi: 10.1039/C7NR04994C
![]() |
[18] |
Mondal S (2017) Preparation, properties and applications of nanocellulosic materials. Carbohyd Polym 163: 301–316. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.050
![]() |
[19] |
Abitbol T, Rivkin A, Cao Y, et al. (2016) Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr Opin Biotech 39: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.002
![]() |
[20] |
Picheth GF, Pirich CL, Sierakowski MR, et al. (2017) Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 104: 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171
![]() |
[21] |
Grishkewich N, Mohammed N, Tang J, et al. (2017) Recent advances in the application of cellulose nanocrystals. Curr Opin Colloid In 29: 32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.005
![]() |
1. | Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Djalal Trache, Thomas M. Klapötke, Kamel Khimeche, Tetrazole-functionalized microcrystalline cellulose: A promising biopolymer for advanced energetic materials, 2020, 400, 13858947, 125960, 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125960 | |
2. | Moufida Beroual, Djalal Trache, Oussama Mehelli, Lokmane Boumaza, Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Mehdi Derradji, Kamel Khimeche, Effect of the Delignification Process on the Physicochemical Properties and Thermal Stability of Microcrystalline Cellulose Extracted from Date Palm Fronds, 2020, 1877-2641, 10.1007/s12649-020-01198-9 | |
3. | Zineb Kassab, Faissal Aziz, Hassan Hannache, Hicham Ben Youcef, Mounir El Achaby, Improved mechanical properties of k-carrageenan-based nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals, 2019, 123, 01418130, 1248, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.030 | |
4. |
Athira Johnson, Jia-Ling He, Fanbin Kong, Yi-Cheng Huang, Sabu Thomas, Hong-Ting Victor Lin, Zwe-Ling Kong,
Surfactin-Loaded ĸ-Carrageenan Oligosaccharides Entangled Cellulose Nanofibers as a Versatile Vehicle Against Periodontal Pathogens , 2020, Volume 15, 1178-2013, 4021, 10.2147/IJN.S238476 |
|
5. | Bruna Luíza Pelegrini, Fabrícia Ré, Mariana Maciel de Oliveira, Thiago Fernandes, Jean Halison Oliveira, Admilton Gonçalves Oliveira Junior, Emerson Marcelo Girotto, C. V. Nakamura, Anderson Reginaldo Sampaio, Adriano Valim, Marli Miriam Souza Lima, Cellulose Nanocrystals as a Sustainable Raw Material: Cytotoxicity and Applications on Healthcare Technology, 2019, 304, 1438-7492, 1900092, 10.1002/mame.201900092 | |
6. | Jing Jing Liao, Nur Hanis Abd Latif, Djalal Trache, Nicolas Brosse, M. Hazwan Hussin, Current advancement on the isolation, characterization and application of lignin, 2020, 162, 01418130, 985, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.168 | |
7. | L.K. Kian, N. Saba, M. Jawaid, H. Fouad, Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose extracted from olive fiber, 2020, 156, 01418130, 347, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.015 | |
8. | Zineb Kassab, Assya Boujemaoui, Hicham Ben Youcef, Abdelghani Hajlane, Hassan Hannache, Mounir El Achaby, Production of cellulose nanofibrils from alfa fibers and its nanoreinforcement potential in polymer nanocomposites, 2019, 26, 0969-0239, 9567, 10.1007/s10570-019-02767-5 | |
9. | Nur Fatin Silmi Mohd Azani, M.K. Mohamad Haafiz, Azeana Zahari, Sophie Poinsignon, Nicolas Brosse, M. Hazwan Hussin, Preparation and characterizations of oil palm fronds cellulose nanocrystal (OPF-CNC) as reinforcing filler in epoxy-Zn rich coating for mild steel corrosion protection, 2020, 153, 01418130, 385, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.020 | |
10. | Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Djalal Trache, Thomas M. Klapötke, Mehdi Derradji, Wissam Bessa, Ecofriendly isolation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from giant reed using various acidic media, 2019, 26, 0969-0239, 7635, 10.1007/s10570-019-02672-x | |
11. | Eugenia Sesto Cabral, Bacterial nano cellulose as non-active pharmaceutical ingredient. Advances and perspectives, 2018, 2, 25759094, 230, 10.15406/mojddt.2017.02.00067 | |
12. | Adil Bahloul, Zineb Kassab, Mehdi El Bouchti, Hassan Hannache, Abou El Kacem Qaiss, Mina Oumam, Mounir El Achaby, Micro- and nano-structures of cellulose from eggplant plant (Solanum melongena L) agricultural residue, 2021, 253, 01448617, 117311, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117311 | |
13. | Djalal Trache, Vijay Kumar Thakur, Rabah Boukherroub, Cellulose Nanocrystals/Graphene Hybrids—A Promising New Class of Materials for Advanced Applications, 2020, 10, 2079-4991, 1523, 10.3390/nano10081523 | |
14. | Mounir El Achaby, Nassima El Miri, Hassan Hannache, Said Gmouh, Hicham Ben youcef, Adil Aboulkas, Production of cellulose nanocrystals from vine shoots and their use for the development of nanocomposite materials, 2018, 117, 01418130, 592, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.201 | |
15. | Zineb Kassab, Edi Syafri, Youssef Tamraoui, Hassan Hannache, Abou El Kacem Qaiss, Mounir El Achaby, Characteristics of sulfated and carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals extracted from Juncus plant stems, 2020, 154, 01418130, 1419, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.023 | |
16. | Haishun Du, Wei Liu, Miaomiao Zhang, Chuanling Si, Xinyu Zhang, Bin Li, Cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils based hydrogels for biomedical applications, 2019, 209, 01448617, 130, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.020 | |
17. | Djalal Trache, M. Hazwan Hussin, Nicolas Brosse, Editorial: Recent Trends in Preparation, Characterization and Applications of Nanocellulose, 2020, 8, 2296-2646, 10.3389/fchem.2020.594379 | |
18. | Dinesh K. Patel, Sayan Deb Dutta, Ki-Taek Lim, Nanocellulose-based polymer hybrids and their emerging applications in biomedical engineering and water purification, 2019, 9, 2046-2069, 19143, 10.1039/C9RA03261D | |
19. | Wissam Bessa, Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Djalal Trache, Mehdi Derradji, Preparation of amino-functionalized microcrystalline cellulose from Arundo Donax L. and its effect on the curing behavior of bisphenol A–based benzoxazine, 2021, 698, 00406031, 178882, 10.1016/j.tca.2021.178882 | |
20. | M.K. Rasweefali, S. Sabu, K.V. Sunooj, A. Sasidharan, K.A. Martin Xavier, Consequences of chemical deacetylation on physicochemical, structural and functional characteristics of chitosan extracted from deep-sea mud shrimp, 2021, 2, 26668939, 100032, 10.1016/j.carpta.2020.100032 | |
21. | Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Djalal Trache, Thomas M. Klapötke, Burkhard Krumm, New insensitive nitrogen-rich energetic polymers based on amino-functionalized cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose: Synthesis and characterization, 2020, 277, 00162361, 118258, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118258 | |
22. | Vaishali Thakur, Ashish Guleria, Sanjay Kumar, Shikha Sharma, Kulvinder Singh, Recent advances in nanocellulose processing, functionalization and applications: a review, 2021, 2633-5409, 10.1039/D1MA00049G | |
23. | Djalal Trache, Vijay Kumar Thakur, Nanocellulose and Nanocarbons Based Hybrid Materials: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, 2020, 10, 2079-4991, 1800, 10.3390/nano10091800 | |
24. | N. Raghav, Manishita R. Sharma, John F. Kennedy, Nanocellulose: A mini-review on types and use in drug delivery systems, 2021, 2, 26668939, 100031, 10.1016/j.carpta.2020.100031 | |
25. | Djalal Trache, Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Mehdi Derradji, Tuan Sherwyn Hamidon, Nanang Masruchin, Nicolas Brosse, M. Hazwan Hussin, Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Applications, 2020, 8, 2296-2646, 10.3389/fchem.2020.00392 | |
26. | Zineb Kassab, Youness Abdellaoui, Mohamed Hamid Salim, Rachid Bouhfid, Abou El Kacem Qaiss, Mounir El Achaby, Micro- and nano-celluloses derived from hemp stalks and their effect as polymer reinforcing materials, 2020, 245, 01448617, 116506, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116506 | |
27. | Fatima A. Hussein, Safanah S. Jaafar, Wafaa M. Salih, Synthesis and characterization of CNC-cefexime nanohybrid as a potential antibacterial agent, 2021, 22147853, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.308 | |
28. | Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Djalal Trache, Thomas M. Klapötke, Microcrystalline cellulose from Posidonia oceanica brown algae: Extraction and characterization, 2019, 138, 01418130, 837, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.176 | |
29. | Anass Ait Benhamou, Zineb Kassab, Mehdi Nadifiyine, Mohamed Hamid Salim, Houssine Sehaqui, Amine Moubarik, Mounir El Achaby, Extraction, characterization and chemical functionalization of phosphorylated cellulose derivatives from Giant Reed Plant, 2021, 0969-0239, 10.1007/s10570-021-03842-6 | |
30. | Mohd Nor Faiz Norrrahim, Tengku Arisyah Tengku Yasim‐Anuar, S.M. Sapuan, R.A. Ilyas, Mohd Idham Hakimi, Syed Umar Faruq Syed Najmuddin, Mohd Azwan Jenol, 2021, 9781119381228, 133, 10.1002/9781119381228.ch8 | |
31. | Djalal Trache, Ahmed Fouzi Tarchoun, Amir Abdelaziz, Wissam Bessa, M. Hazwan Hussin, Nicolas Brosse, Vijay Kumar Thakur, Cellulose nanofibrils–graphene hybrids: recent advances in fabrication, properties, and applications, 2022, 14, 2040-3364, 12515, 10.1039/D2NR01967A | |
32. | Thai Dinh Cuong, Nguyen Viet Linh, Nguyen Hoang Chung, Le Quang Dien, Study on antibacterial papermaking for food packaging using rice straw nanocellulose and nanochitosan, 2021, 947, 1755-1307, 012023, 10.1088/1755-1315/947/1/012023 | |
33. | Radheesh Sharma Meda, Somya Jain, Shiva Singh, Chhavi Verma, Upendranath Nandi, Pradip K. Maji, Novel Lagenaria siceraria peel waste based cellulose nanocrystals: Isolation and rationalizing H-bonding interactions, 2022, 186, 09266690, 115197, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115197 | |
34. | Gourav Kamboj, Milan Gaff, Jerzy Smardzewski, Eva Haviarová, David Hui, Radim Rousek, Sumanta Das, Fatemeh Rezaei, Anil Kumar Sethy, Comparative study on the properties of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) reinforced 1C-PUR adhesive bonded wooden joints, 2022, 344, 09500618, 128262, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128262 | |
35. | Chuang Zhang, Jiahui Wu, Xu Qiu, Jie Zhang, Huiqi Chang, Haifeng He, Lifen Zhao, Xin Liu, Enteromorpha cellulose micro-nanofibrils/poly(vinyl alcohol) based composite films with excellent hydrophilic, mechanical properties and improved thermal stability, 2022, 217, 01418130, 229, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.150 | |
36. | R.K. Gond, M.K. Gupta, Harinder Singh, Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa, Suchart Siengchin, 2022, 9780128237915, 59, 10.1016/B978-0-12-823791-5.00011-9 | |
37. | Jie Liu, Ying Pei, Yitong Dong, Zhilu Rao, Jiankang Chen, Keyong Tang, 2021, 1392, 9780841298149, 219, 10.1021/bk-2021-1392.ch011 | |
38. | Lili Ren, Guoyi He, Yaxin Zhou, Jie Dai, Wenjun Miao, Chengcheng Ouyang, Jia Liu, Guoguang Chen, A hydrogel based on nanocellulose/polydopamine/gelatin used for the treatment of MRSA infected wounds with broad-spectrum antibacterial and antioxidant properties and tissue suitability, 2022, 10, 2047-4830, 3174, 10.1039/D2BM00157H | |
39. | W. Zulaikha, Mohamad Zaki Hassan, Zarini Ismail, Recent development of natural fibre for nanocellulose extraction and application, 2022, 66, 22147853, 2265, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.221 | |
40. | Heriarivelo Risite, Mohamed Hamid Salim, Bricharles T. Oudinot, El-houssaine Ablouh, Heriniaina T. Joyeux, Houssine Sehaqui, Jean Hugues A. Razafimahatratra, Abou El Kacem Qaiss, Mounir El Achaby, Zineb Kassab, Artemisia annua Stems a New Sustainable Source for Cellulosic Materials: Production and Characterization of Cellulose Microfibers and Nanocrystals, 2022, 13, 1877-2641, 2411, 10.1007/s12649-021-01658-w | |
41. | Do Yee Hoo, Zhen Li Low, Darren Yi Sern Low, Siah Ying Tang, Sivakumar Manickam, Khang Wei Tan, Zhen Hong Ban, Ultrasonic cavitation: An effective cleaner and greener intensification technology in the extraction and surface modification of nanocellulose, 2022, 90, 13504177, 106176, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106176 | |
42. | Patricia Jayshree Samuel Jacob, 2022, Chapter 12, 978-1-80355-708-3, 10.5772/intechopen.106473 | |
43. | J. A. Resendiz-Vazquez, R. Roman-Doval, F. Santoyo-Fexas, M. A. Gómez-Lim, M. Verdín-García, S. Mendoza, Chemical and Biological Delignification Treatments from Blue Agave and Sorghum By-Products to Obtain Cellulose Nanocrystals, 2022, 13, 1877-2641, 1157, 10.1007/s12649-021-01547-2 | |
44. | Anass Ait Benhamou, Zineb Kassab, Abdelghani Boussetta, Mohamed Hamid Salim, El-Houssaine Ablouh, Mehdi Nadifiyine, Abou El Kacem QAISS, Amine MOUBARIK, Mounir El ACHABY, Beneficiation of cactus fruit waste seeds for the production of cellulose nanostructures: Extraction and properties, 2022, 203, 01418130, 302, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.163 | |
45. | Vishnu Raju, Revathi Revathiswaran, Kizhaeral Sevanthapandian Subramanian, Kalappan Thangamuthu Parthiban, Kalichamy Chandrakumar, Elaveetil Vasu Anoop, Cintil Jose Chirayil, Isolation and characterization of nanocellulose from selected hardwoods, viz., Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. and Casuarina equisetifolia L., by steam explosion method, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-26600-5 | |
46. | Dariya Getya, Ivan Gitsov, Reactive Cellu-mers—A Novel Approach to Improved Cellulose/Polymer Composites, 2022, 14, 2073-4360, 1670, 10.3390/polym14091670 | |
47. | Olawumi O. Sadare, Kelvin O. Yoro, Kapil Moothi, Michael O. Daramola, Lignocellulosic Biomass-Derived Nanocellulose Crystals as Fillers in Membranes for Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Review, 2022, 12, 2077-0375, 320, 10.3390/membranes12030320 | |
48. | Anam Saddique, In Woo Cheong, Recent advances in three-dimensional bioprinted nanocellulose-based hydrogel scaffolds for biomedical applications, 2021, 38, 0256-1115, 2171, 10.1007/s11814-021-0926-x | |
49. | S. Sabu, A. Sasidharan, V. Venugopal, 2022, Chapter 20, 978-3-030-92805-6, 333, 10.1007/978-3-030-92806-3_20 | |
50. | Ikrame Ayouch, Ilias Barrak, Ihsane Kassem, Zineb Kassab, Khalid Draoui, Mounir El Achaby, Ultrasonic-mediated production of carboxylated cellulose nanospheres, 2021, 9, 22133437, 106302, 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106302 | |
51. | Lăcrămioara Popa, Mihaela Violeta Ghica, Elena-Emilia Tudoroiu, Diana-Georgiana Ionescu, Cristina-Elena Dinu-Pîrvu, Bacterial Cellulose—A Remarkable Polymer as a Source for Biomaterials Tailoring, 2022, 15, 1996-1944, 1054, 10.3390/ma15031054 | |
52. | Abdelghani Boussetta, Hassan Charii, Anass Ait Benhamou, El-Houssaine Ablouh, Francisco J. Barba, Nabil Grimi, Mario J. Simirgiotis, Amine Moubarik, Bio-composites based on cellulosic fibers from agro-industrial waste filled PP matrix: production and properties, 2023, 0170-0839, 10.1007/s00289-023-04698-5 | |
53. | E. Soroush, Z. Mohammadpour, M. Kharaziha, H.R. Bakhsheshi-Rad, F. Berto, Polysaccharides-based nanofibrils: From tissue engineering to biosensor applications, 2022, 291, 01448617, 119670, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119670 | |
54. | Beatriz Rodríguez-Martínez, Aloia Romaní, Beatriz Gullón, Remedios Yáñez, 2023, 9780323917438, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91743-8.00009-5 | |
55. | Anna E. Ivbanikaro, Amos Adeniyi, Cellulose nanocrystals: source, production and application as a coagulant for water purification, 2023, 1751-231X, 10.2166/wpt.2023.064 | |
56. | Alina Ghilan, Raluca Nicu, Diana E. Ciolacu, Florin Ciolacu, Insight into the Latest Medical Applications of Nanocellulose, 2023, 16, 1996-1944, 4447, 10.3390/ma16124447 | |
57. | Ebuka Chizitere Emenike, Kingsley O. Iwuozor, Oluwaseyi D. Saliu, James Ramontja, Adewale George Adeniyi, Advances in the Extraction, Classification, Modification, Emerging and Advanced Applications of Crystalline Cellulose: A Review, 2023, 26668939, 100337, 10.1016/j.carpta.2023.100337 | |
58. | Sérgio R. S. Veloso, Ana G. Azevedo, Paulo F. Teixeira, Célio B. P. Fernandes, Cellulose Nanocrystal (CNC) Gels: A Review, 2023, 9, 2310-2861, 574, 10.3390/gels9070574 | |
59. | Anass Ait Benhamou, Zineb Kassab, Fatima-Zahra Semlali Aouragh Hassani, El-Houssaine Ablouh, Rachid Bouhfid, Abou El Kacem Qaiss, Amine Moubarik, Houssine Sehaqui, Mounir El Achaby, 2023, Chapter 6, 978-981-99-2472-1, 145, 10.1007/978-981-99-2473-8_6 | |
60. | Anna E. Ivbanikaro, Jonathan O. Okonkwo, Emmanuel R. Sadiku, Charity E. Maepa, Recent development in the formation and surface modification of cellulose-bead nanocomposites as adsorbents for water purification: a comprehensive review, 2023, 43, 0334-6447, 680, 10.1515/polyeng-2023-0056 | |
61. | Atiqah Salleh, Manira Maarof, Zawani Mazlan, Syafira Masri, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Safa Tahri, Izzat Zulkiflee, Nusaibah Sallehuddin, Maheswary Thambirajoo, Loai A. Elfawy, Ibrahim N. Amirrah, Nur Amalia Ra’oh, Mh Busra Fauzi, 2023, Chapter 2, 978-981-99-2266-6, 27, 10.1007/978-981-99-2267-3_2 | |
62. | Haiyan Liu, Yang Hu, Yingyu Liu, Rong Hu, Xiuping Wu, Bing Li, A review of recent advances in biomedical applications of smart cellulose-based hydrogels, 2023, 253, 01418130, 127149, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127149 | |
63. | Tarisha Gupta, Madhav Dutt, Laishram Saya, 2023, Chapter 12, 978-3-031-41076-5, 263, 10.1007/978-3-031-41077-2_12 | |
64. | B.A. Aderibigbe, 2024, 9781394172375, 193, 10.1002/9781394172825.ch8 | |
65. | Malgorzata A. Zboinska, Sanna Sämfors, Paul Gatenholm, Robotically 3D printed architectural membranes from ambient dried cellulose nanofibril-alginate hydrogel, 2023, 236, 02641275, 112472, 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112472 | |
66. | Muhammad Rafique Khan, Muhammad Wasim, Amjad Farooq, Muhammad Awais Naeem, Muhammad Mushtaq, Junyan Liu, Chaofan Chen, Qufu Wei, A review study on derivation of nanocellulose to its functional properties and applications in drug delivery system, food packaging, and biosensing devices, 2024, 0170-0839, 10.1007/s00289-024-05190-4 | |
67. | Muhammad Syukri Bin Mohamad Misenan, Mohamad Saman Ahmad Farabi, Zulkipli Nor Akhlisah, Nor Ain Fatihah Azlisham, 2024, 9780443224140, 295, 10.1016/B978-0-443-22414-0.00016-8 | |
68. | Saleheen Bano, Chhavi Sharma, Nikhil Rampatra, Asif Ali, Yuvraj Singh Negi, 2024, 9780323886550, 303, 10.1016/B978-0-323-88655-0.00010-0 | |
69. | González Exequiel, Sesto Cabral Maria Eugenia, Bacterial nanocellulose, a sustainable alternative, to implement cleaner production in the design of biosensors to detect heavy metals in surface waters, 2023, 8, 25732838, 53, 10.15406/ijbsbe.2023.08.00234 | |
70. | Ahmed Albahnasavi, 2024, 9780128035818, 10.1016/B978-0-323-95486-0.00118-6 | |
71. | M. F. Bambo, K. P. Matabola, B. May, N. Chauke, T. Munonde, 2024, Chapter 9, 978-981-97-6870-7, 185, 10.1007/978-981-97-6871-4_9 | |
72. | Bantamlak Birlie Kassie, Muluken Jemberie Getahun, Aklilu Azanaw, Bayu Teshome Ferede, Dehenenet Flatie Tassew, Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals for biomedical and personal hygiene applications, 2024, 282, 01418130, 136949, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136949 | |
73. | Hamza Daoudi, Anass Ait Benhamou, Amine Moubarik, Mounir El Achaby, Zineb Kassab, Influence of morphological diversity of cellulose nanocrystals and nanospheres on nanocomposites with chitosan, 2024, 0969-0239, 10.1007/s10570-024-06293-x | |
74. | Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Rio Yamagishi, Andik Nisa Zahra Zainuddin, Nurul Nadhirah Mustakim, Farah Alea Rosemanzailani, Mh Busra Fauzi, 2024, 978-1-83767-233-2, 245, 10.1039/9781837673094-00245 | |
75. | Abhijeet Singh, Simrandeep Kaur, Harshita Thakur, Sakshi Kashyap, Asyakina Lyudmila, Gaurav Mudgal, 2025, Chapter 1, 978-3-031-76952-8, 1, 10.1007/978-3-031-76953-5_1 | |
76. | V. Parthasarathy, P. Senthil Kumar, A.A. Annie, Senthilkumar Krishnasamy, M. Chandrasekar, Recent progress in nanocellulose-based biocomposites for bone tissue engineering and wound healing applications, 2025, 01448617, 123455, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123455 | |
77. | Melkamu Birlie Genet, Xinshu Zhuang, Xuesong Tan, Quan Zhang, Changlin Miao, Zhanying Zhang, Addis Lemessa Jembere, Cellulose nanocrystal-based synthetic biodegradable biopolymeric composites: A comprehensive review on recent progress, 2025, 299, 01418130, 140098, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140098 | |
78. | Thean Heng Tan, Najihah Mohd Hashim, Wageeh Abdulhadi Yehya Dabdawb, Mochamad Zakki Fahmi, Hwei Voon Lee, Folic Acid-Functionalized Nanocrystalline Cellulose as a Renewable and Biocompatible Nanomaterial for Cancer-Targeting Nanoparticles, 2024, 12, 2164-6341, 29, 10.32604/jrm.2023.043449 | |
79. | P. M. Visakh, 2025, Chapter 1, 978-3-031-78556-6, 1, 10.1007/978-3-031-78557-3_1 | |
80. | Palanisamy Sivasubramanian, Gauri S. Deshmukh, Thambiannan Senthilkumar, Vellaichamy Mageshwaran, Yalarvathi Nagaraju, 2025, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-78556-6, 23, 10.1007/978-3-031-78557-3_2 |
Terminology and nomenclature of nanocellulose | Typical sources | Approximate dimensions | Advantageous properties |
Cellulose nanocrystals, nanocrystalline cellulose, cellulose nanocrystals | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 4–70 nm in width; 100–6000 nm in length | Low density, low coefficient of thermal expansion, high tensile strength, high surface area, elongated morphology, ease of bioconjugation |
Cellulose nanofibril, nanofibrillar cellulose, nanofbrillated cellulose | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 20–100 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | Large specific area, significant barrier, mechanical and colloidal properties, low density |
Bacterial nanocellulose, microbial nanocellulose | Low molecular weight sugars | 10–50 nm in width; > 1000 nm in length | Unique nanostructure, purity, higher-dimensional stability, greater mechanical strength, greater capacity to hold water |
Amorphous cellulose | Wood pulp, cotton | 20–120 nm in width; 50–120 nm in length | Increased content of functional groups and high sorption ability |
Cellulose nanoyarn | Cellulose and cellulose derivatives | 100–1000 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | High surface area, high blotting ability |
Terminology and nomenclature of nanocellulose | Typical sources | Approximate dimensions | Advantageous properties |
Cellulose nanocrystals, nanocrystalline cellulose, cellulose nanocrystals | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 4–70 nm in width; 100–6000 nm in length | Low density, low coefficient of thermal expansion, high tensile strength, high surface area, elongated morphology, ease of bioconjugation |
Cellulose nanofibril, nanofibrillar cellulose, nanofbrillated cellulose | Hardwood, Softwood, Annual plants/Agricultural residues, Bacteria, etc. | 20–100 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | Large specific area, significant barrier, mechanical and colloidal properties, low density |
Bacterial nanocellulose, microbial nanocellulose | Low molecular weight sugars | 10–50 nm in width; > 1000 nm in length | Unique nanostructure, purity, higher-dimensional stability, greater mechanical strength, greater capacity to hold water |
Amorphous cellulose | Wood pulp, cotton | 20–120 nm in width; 50–120 nm in length | Increased content of functional groups and high sorption ability |
Cellulose nanoyarn | Cellulose and cellulose derivatives | 100–1000 nm in width; > 10,000 nm in length | High surface area, high blotting ability |