Soil carbon sequestration across a chronosequence of tallgrass prairie restorations in the Ozark Highlands region of northwest Arkansas

Marya McKee; Kristofor R. Brye; Lisa Wood; Marya McKee; Kristofor R. Brye; Lisa Wood

doi:10.3934/geosci.2019.1.1

AIMS Geosciences

2019, Volume 5, Issue 1: 1-24. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.1.1

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Soil carbon sequestration across a chronosequence of tallgrass prairie restorations in the Ozark Highlands region of northwest Arkansas

Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

Received: 29 October 2018 Accepted: 09 January 2018 Published: 18 January 2019

Prairie restoration studies and research conducted in native prairie systems have been mostly centered in the Great Plains region of the United States and little research has been pursued in Arkansas to further understand the soil carbon (C) sequestration potential over time of remnant prairie sites and prairie restorations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of restoration age and soil moisture regime on near-surface soil C and other soil property changes over time in a chronosequence of humid-temperate tallgrass prairie restorations (i.e., 15, 16, 17, and 38 yr) in the Ozark Highlands region of northwest Arkansas. A nearby undisturbed, native prairie was also studied for comparison as a baseline. Soil samples were collected from the top 10 cm in 2005 and 2017 and the change over time was assessed for soil bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, soil organic matter (SOM), total C (TC), total nitrogen (TN), and the fraction of TC and TN in SOM. Soil property magnitudes from the 2017 sampling only were also compared among sites to evaluate the current state of the restorations. Soil properties within the restorations generally behaved as expected, with beneficial decreases in soil BD and increases in SOM, TC, TN, and TC and TN fractions of SOM occurring over time as restoration age increased and tended towards that in the native prairie. The direct measurement of change in total C content over time differed (P = 0.03) between soil moisture regimes among ecosystems, where the greatest soil C sequestration rate of 0.6 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ was recorded in the native prairie in the aquic soil moisture regime, while soil C sequestration rates ranged from −0.21 to 0.12 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ across the four prairie restorations. Results indicate that the prairie restorations evaluated in this study are still evolving and have not yet reached the rate of C sequestration observed in the native, undisturbed prairie ecosystem and that direct measurement of soil C storage changes over time should be used whenever possible.
- prairie restoration,
- native prairie,
- silt-loam soils,
- soil carbon
Citation: Marya McKee, Kristofor R. Brye, Lisa Wood. Soil carbon sequestration across a chronosequence of tallgrass prairie restorations in the Ozark Highlands region of northwest Arkansas[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(1): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.1.1

Related Papers:

Abstract

Prairie restoration studies and research conducted in native prairie systems have been mostly centered in the Great Plains region of the United States and little research has been pursued in Arkansas to further understand the soil carbon (C) sequestration potential over time of remnant prairie sites and prairie restorations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of restoration age and soil moisture regime on near-surface soil C and other soil property changes over time in a chronosequence of humid-temperate tallgrass prairie restorations (i.e., 15, 16, 17, and 38 yr) in the Ozark Highlands region of northwest Arkansas. A nearby undisturbed, native prairie was also studied for comparison as a baseline. Soil samples were collected from the top 10 cm in 2005 and 2017 and the change over time was assessed for soil bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, soil organic matter (SOM), total C (TC), total nitrogen (TN), and the fraction of TC and TN in SOM. Soil property magnitudes from the 2017 sampling only were also compared among sites to evaluate the current state of the restorations. Soil properties within the restorations generally behaved as expected, with beneficial decreases in soil BD and increases in SOM, TC, TN, and TC and TN fractions of SOM occurring over time as restoration age increased and tended towards that in the native prairie. The direct measurement of change in total C content over time differed (P = 0.03) between soil moisture regimes among ecosystems, where the greatest soil C sequestration rate of 0.6 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ was recorded in the native prairie in the aquic soil moisture regime, while soil C sequestration rates ranged from −0.21 to 0.12 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ across the four prairie restorations. Results indicate that the prairie restorations evaluated in this study are still evolving and have not yet reached the rate of C sequestration observed in the native, undisturbed prairie ecosystem and that direct measurement of soil C storage changes over time should be used whenever possible.

References

[1]	Samson F, Knopf K (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44: 418–421. doi: 10.2307/1312365
[2]	National Park Service (NPS) (2017) Tallgrass Prairie Conservation. National Preserve Kansas. Available from: http://www.nps.gov/tapr/index.htm.
[3]	Brye KR, Riley TL (2009) Soil and plant property differences across a chronosequence of humid-temperate tallgrass prairie restorations. Soil Sci 174: 346–357. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181a93daa
[4]	Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
[5]	Brye KR, West CP (2005) Grassland management effects on soil surface properties in the Ozark Highlands. Soil Sci 170: 63–73. doi: 10.1097/00010694-200501000-00008
[6]	United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) (1981) Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. Agriculture Handbook 296. Washington, D.C.
[7]	Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) (2017) Osage Prairie Conservation Area. Available from: https://nature.mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/places/osage-prairie.
[8]	Brady NC, Weil RR (2008) The Nature and Properties of Soils. 14th ed. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[9]	Kucharik CJ, Roth JA, Nabielski RT (2003) Statistical assessment of a paired site approach for verification of C and N sequestration on Wisconsin Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land. J Soil Water Conserv 58: 58–67.
[10]	Parton WJ, Stewart JWB, Cole CV (1988) Dynamics of C, N, P, and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochem 5: 109–131. doi: 10.1007/BF02180320
[11]	Jenkinson DS (1990) The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond 329: 361–368. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0177
[12]	Brye KR, Kucharik CJ (2003) Carbon and nitrogen sequestration in two prairies topochronosequences on contrasting soils in southern Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 149: 90–103. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(2003)149[0090:CANSIT]2.0.CO;2
[13]	Kucharik CJ (2007) Impact of prairie age and soil order on carbon and nitrogen sequestration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71: 430–441. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0074
[14]	Brye KR, Gbur EE (2011) Near-surface soil property changes over time as affected by grassland management in the Ozark Highlands. Soil Sci 176: 129–135. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e31820ca9a8
[15]	Brye KR, Riley TL, Gbur EE (2008) Prairie restoration effects on soil properties in the Ozark Highlands. J Integ Biosci 4: 87–104.
[16]	Post WM, Kwon KC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: process and potential. Global Change Biol 6: 317–327. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x
[17]	Burke IC, Laurenroth WK, Coffin DP (1995) Soil organic matter recovery in semiarid grasslands: Implications for the Conservation Reserve Program. Ecol Monogr 5: 793–801.
[18]	Follet RF, Samson-Liebig SE, Kimble JM, et al. (2001) Carbon sequestration under the CRP in the historic grassland soils of the United States. In: R. Lal (ed.). Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect. SSSA Special Publication 57. SSSA, Madison, WI, 27–49.
[19]	United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) (2010) Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th ed. Washington, D.C.
[20]	Dale E (1983) Plant Communities and Rare or Endangered Plant Species of Pea Ridge National Military Park, Benton County, Arkansas. Final Report Submitted Under Purchase Order No. 26397. United States Department of Interior, Washington, DC.
[21]	Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission (ANHC) (2009) System of Natural Areas. Natural Areas. Available from: http://www.naturalheritage.com/NaturalAreas/natural-areas-1.
[22]	National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) (2010) Data Tools: 1981–2010 Normals. 1981–2010 Normals \| Data Tools \| Climate Data Online (CDO) \| National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Available from: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals.
[23]	Brye KR (2006) Soil physiochemical changes following 12 years of annual burning in a humid-subtropical tallgrass prairie: A hypothesis. Acta Oecol 30: 407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2006.06.001
[24]	Brye KR, Gbur EE (2010) Regional differences in soil carbon and nitrogen storage as affected by land use and soil moisture regime. Soil Sci 175: 339–348. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181e83db2
[25]	Brye KR, Moreno L (2006) Vegetation removal effects on soil quality in a native tallgrass prairie fragment in east-central Arkansas. Nat Areas J 26: 94–100. doi: 10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[94:VREOSQ]2.0.CO;2
[26]	National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (2017) Web Soil Survey. Available from: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.
[27]	Brye KR, Gower ST, Norman JM, et al. (2002) Carbon budgets for a prairie and agroecosystems: effects of land use and interannual variability. Ecol Appl 12: 962–979. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0962:CBFAPA]2.0.CO;2
[28]	Jones MB, Donnelly A (2004) Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO₂. New Phytol 164:423–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01201.x
[29]	Kucharik CJ, Brye KR, Norman JM, et al. (2001) Measurements and modeling of carbon and nitrogen cycling in agroecosystems of southern Wisconsin: potential for SOC sequestration during the next 50 years. Ecosystems 4: 237–139. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0007-2
[30]	Christiansen PA, Thompson ML (2000) Changes in soil organic matter following establishment of prairie species. In: Conference poster abstracts, Carbon: exploring the benefits to farmers and society. Des Moines, IA, 29–31.
[31]	Kucharik CJ, Fayram NJ, Cahill KN (2006) A paired study of prairie carbon stocks, fluxes, and phenology: Comparing the world's oldest prairie restoration with an adjacent remnant. Global Change Biol 12: 122–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01053.x
[32]	Potter KN, Torbert HA, Johnson HB, et al. (1999) Carbon storage after long term grass establishment on degraded soils. Soil Sci 164: 718–725. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199910000-00002
[33]	Sherman LA, Brye KR (2009) Sequential burning effects on the soil chemistry of a grassland restoration in the Mid-Atlantic coastal plain of the United States. Ecol Restor 27: 428–438. doi: 10.3368/er.27.4.428
[34]	Derner JD, Shuman GE (2007) Carbon sequestration and rangelands: a synthesis of land management and precipitation effects. J Soil Water Conserv 62: 77–65.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)