
Citation: Ericson Esquibel Coracero, Pastor Malabrigo, Jr.. Carbon storage potential of the tree species along the ultramafic forest in Sitio Dicasalarin, Barangay Zabali, Baler, Aurora, Philippines[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 589-601. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020037
[1] | Rachel R. Sleeter, William Acevedo, Christopher E. Soulard, Benjamin M. Sleeter . Methods used to parameterize the spatially-explicit components of a state-and-transition simulation model. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 668-693. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.668 |
[2] | Benjamin M. Sleeter, Jinxun Liu, Colin Daniel, Leonardo Frid, Zhiliang Zhu . An integrated approach to modeling changes in land use, land cover, and disturbance and their impact on ecosystem carbon dynamics: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 577-606. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.577 |
[3] | Kumari Anjali, YSC Khuman, Jaswant Sokhi . A Review of the interrelations of terrestrial carbon sequestration and urban forests. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 464-485. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020030 |
[4] | Geraldo Ceni Coelho, Glaci Benvenuti-Ferreira, Jorge Schirmer, Osório A. Lucchese . Survival, growth and seed mass in a mixed tree species planting for Atlantic Forest restoration. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(3): 382-394. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.382 |
[5] | Jennifer K. Costanza, Robert C. Abt, Alexa J. McKerrow, Jaime A. Collazo . Linking state-and-transition simulation and timber supply models for forest biomass production scenarios. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 180-202. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.180 |
[6] | Maria da Conceição Pereira, Mónica Moura, Isabel Estrela Rego, Luís Silva . Local knowledge of the flora of a region: implications in biodiversity conservation. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(4): 778-803. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.4.778 |
[7] | Eric Ariel L. Salas, Virginia A. Seamster, Kenneth G. Boykin, Nicole M. Harings, Keith W. Dixon . Modeling the impacts of climate change on Species of Concern (birds) in South Central U.S. based on bioclimatic variables. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 358-385. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.358 |
[8] | Ndakara Ofudjaye Emmanuel, Ofuoko Ukaro Albert . Characterizing plant biomass and soil parameters under exotic trees within rainforest environment in southern Nigeria. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 611-626. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020039 |
[9] | Kathleen D Reinhardt, Wirdateti, K.AI. Nekaris . Climate-mediated activity of the Javan Slow Loris, Nycticebus javanicus. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(2): 249-260. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.2.249 |
[10] | Lawrence H. Tanner, Megan M. Vandewarker . Significance of vegetation cover differences on albedo and soil carbon on a basaltic sandplain in southern Iceland. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(6): 435-444. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.6.435 |
Forests are armor and weapons against the global effects of climate change [1]. It was highlighted by FAO [2] that forests can act as carbon sink (sequestration) or source of carbon in different times. Establishment and protection of forest and tree plantations can increase the carbon storage in aboveground and belowground biomass [3]. Trees are one of the crucial components of the ecosystem in carbon storage and sequestration through capturing carbon and using it in physiological processes such as photosynthesis [4].
Ecologically important tree species such as endemic and threatened greatly contribute to carbon storage [5], ecosystem sustainability, and biodiversity [6]. Endemic and threatened species are highly prioritized in conservation and protection [7]. Therefore, the species long-term effect on carbon storage and sustaining forest ecosystem and diversity is significant [8].
Sitio Dicasalarin is classified as an ultramafic forest. This type of forest has soil characterized by a high amount of heavy metals such as nickel, chromium, iron and magnesium. Usually, this type of forest is situated on ultrabasic rocks that have very low silica but high in magnesium oxide (MgO) and ferrous oxide (FeO) and has pronounced dark colored soil [9]. Dominant genera of trees include Phyllanthus, Psychotria, Medinilla, and Syzygium. These species that thrive in ultramafic forests commonly exhibit morphological adaptations to survive extreme conditions through minimization of water requirements and uptaking of nickel and magnesium [10].
Carbon storage potential of tree species is an interesting aspect to study. It is important to assess the carbon storage and sequestration capacity of trees to know the amount of carbon stored instead of emitting and letting it accumulate into the atmosphere as greenhouse gas [11]. There are no online scientific publications on carbon stock assessment in Baler, Aurora in the Philippines. Therefore, the present study will pioneer that issue.
The general aim of our study was to assess the carbon storage potential of the ultramafic forest in Sitio Dicasalarin, Barangay Zabali, Baler, Aurora, Philippines. Specifically, it aimed to: a. evaluate the relationship of tree carbon stock with factors like species richness, species abundance (number of individuals) and altitude, b. determine the carbon stock of ecologically important species, and c. identify the most important species in terms of carbon storage potential.
The study was conducted in the ultramafic forest of Sitio Dicasalarin, Barangay Zabali, Baler, Aurora located at 15.75833 N 121.5625 E (Figure 1). The site is a part of the Sierra Madre Mountain Range. Sierra Madre is known to be one of the most important areas in terms of ecological value. It traverses through nine provinces namely, Cagayan, Isabela, Nueva Vizcaya, Quirino, Nueva Ecija, Aurora, Bulacan, Rizal, and Quezon [12].
The study site belongs to the Type Ⅳ climate with evenly distributed rainfall throughout the year [13]. It was also reported that rainfall is usually at maximum during the months of October, November, September, and May while at the lowest during the month of February.
Three 2 km transect belts were laid following an existing trail in the area (Figure 1). For each transect, 9 20x20m quadrats were established at 250 m interval from the starting point at 0 m (Quadrat 0) to 2000 m (Quadrat 9) (Figure 2). Note that quadrats were placed at the left and right side of the trail in alternating manner to cover species at both sides. A total of 27 quadrats summing up to 10800m2 or 1.08 ha was surveyed for the study. Locations of the quadrats were obtained together with the elevation which will be used in the data analysis (Table 1).
Transect | Quadrat | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation (masl) |
1 | 0 | 15.73213 | 121.6337 | 153.2 |
1 | 1 | 15.73009 | 121.6337 | 171.9 |
1 | 2 | 15.72863 | 121.6343 | 200.5 |
1 | 3 | 15.72678 | 121.6348 | 227.3 |
1 | 4 | 15.72583 | 121.6349 | 247.7 |
1 | 5 | 15.72477 | 121.6348 | 265.6 |
1 | 6 | 15.72356 | 121.6348 | 293.3 |
1 | 7 | 15.72211 | 121.6346 | 313.1 |
1 | 8 | 15.72133 | 121.6333 | 320.5 |
2 | 0 | 15.74697 | 121.6302 | 170.8 |
2 | 1 | 15.74603 | 121.6294 | 202.1 |
2 | 2 | 15.74543 | 121.6285 | 231.4 |
2 | 3 | 15.74436 | 121.6282 | 253.5 |
2 | 4 | 15.74536 | 121.6258 | 252.1 |
2 | 5 | 15.74437 | 121.625 | 263.6 |
2 | 6 | 15.74401 | 121.624 | 259 |
2 | 7 | 15.74418 | 121.6228 | 256.4 |
2 | 8 | 15.74448 | 121.6213 | 260.2 |
3 | 0 | 15.73588 | 121.6344 | 21.6 |
3 | 1 | 15.73485 | 121.636 | 26.5 |
3 | 2 | 15.73318 | 121.6364 | 39.9 |
3 | 3 | 15.73099 | 121.6368 | 72.1 |
3 | 4 | 15.7308 | 121.6367 | 73.4 |
3 | 5 | 15.72989 | 121.6373 | 94.9 |
3 | 6 | 15.72937 | 121.6383 | 105 |
3 | 7 | 15.72837 | 121.6383 | 104.3 |
3 | 8 | 15.72743 | 121.6384 | 109.7 |
Tree inventory commenced from June to July 2017. All trees with a diameter at breast height of at least 5cm inside the quadrats were identified, counted and recorded. The diameter at breast height (DBH) at 1.3 meters of the trees were measured. Observations in the field like flowering and fruiting species were noted and photo documented.
Voucher specimens of species were collected, photographed and placed inside herbarium bags for identification and verification purposes. Specimens were properly tagged and pressed in newspaper. After pressing, the voucher specimens were placed inside the herbarium bags. Each bag contained 20 specimens at most. Denatured alcohol was then poured in each bag enough to soak all the specimens to avoid fungal attacks and leaf deformation. After the three-week long data collection, the specimens were oven dried at 60 ℃ in the Botany Laboratory of the Forest Biological Sciences Building in the College of Forestry and Natural Resources University of the Philippines Los Baños (CFNR-UPLB).
A total of 139 species with 2239 individuals from 87 genera and 46 families was recorded from the forest ecosystem of Sitio Dicasalarin (Table S1). After the identification of species, each was assessed in terms of conservation status and endemism. Conservation status of species was based on the IUCN Redlist of Threatened Species [15] and DAO 2017-11 or the Updated National List of Threatened Philippine Plants and their Categories [16]. Endemism of species, on the other hand, was obtained from the Co's Digital Flora of the Philippines website [17].
Species richness and abundance was calculated based on the data collected in the field. Soecies richness was based on the number of species found while abundance was obtained by counting the number of individuals of the species.
In the estimation of carbon storage potential of the tree species in the area, a series of formulas [18] were used. The standard formula for carbon stock in biomass (CS) is CS = (AGB + BGB) x 0.5, wherein AGB is aboveground biomass, BGB is belowground biomass, and 0.5 is the conversion factor. To compute for the estimate of AGB denoted as Y (in kilograms), the formula is Y = 34.4703-8.0671 D + 0.6589 D2. BGB, on the other hand, is only 15% of AGB expressed as BGB = AGB x (15/100) [18]. This formula is considered standard in tropical forests just like the Philippines, as well as the conversion factor of 0.5 or 50% as used in many similar studies [19]. These series of formulas used were from recent studies within Asia having generally the same forest types with the Philippines being a tropical region.
Overall computation of the CS of the study site was done to show the importance of the area in storing carbon. Also, a separate computation of the carbon stock of Philippine endemic and threatened species was done to highlight the contribution of these ecologically important species in carbon storage.
Regression analysis of the data was also done to know the relationship between tree carbon stock and factors such as species richness, species abundance, and elevation. Regression analysis can help in determining the following if independent variables have significant effect or relationship with the dependent variable [20].
The sampling area had a total carbon stock of 306.48 t ha−1 while per transect value ranges from 69.57 to 160.82 tons (Table 2). This was a relatively high value compared the studies conducted in the Philippines. Labata et al. [21] found that the three agroforestry systems in Bukidnon had a total carbon stock of 54.83 t ha−1 which is three times less than the estimated CS value of at Sitio Dicasalarin. In the urban setting in Cebu City, the trees were found to have CS of 87.81 t ha−1 [22]. Moreover, the CS value of Sitio Dicasalarin is more than that of the yield of study conducted by Tulod [23], wherein the five reforestation sites (aged 15 to 34) in the Southern Philippines had a CS value of around 210 t ha−1. Sitio Dicasalarin exceeded the general standards that Lasco and Pulhin [24] mentioned in their study on Philippine forest ecosystems that secondary forests in the Philippines were found to have a mean of 207.9 tons/ha. Results showed that Sitio Dicasalarin is superior in terms of carbon storage than other areas in the Philippines.
Species Richness | Species Abundance | Carbon Stock | |
Transect 1 | 88 | 699 | 100.69 tons |
Transect 2 | 79 | 934 | 160.82 tons |
Transect 3 | 85 | 606 | 69.57 tons |
OVERALL | 139 | 2239 | 331.08 tons or 306.48 t ha−1 |
There were also a number of carbon storage potential studies abroad. In China, Liu et al. [25] found that the subtropical forest in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (GNNR) in Zhejiang Province, southeast China yielded a total of about 149 t ha−1. Another carbon study in Majiya Fuelwood Reserve, Sokoto State in Nigeria revealed a total CS (based on AGB and BGB) of 53.5 t ha−1 [26]. In Western Odisha, India, a sacred natural forest was assessed and found to have a stored carbon of 125.21 t ha−1 [27]. The CS values estimated in the findings of the studies mentioned were all less than the computed CS value for the present study in Sitio Dicasalarin. The strict management being implemented by the property owner of the forest prevented the loss of tree species contributing to the preserved natural resources in the area. On the other hand, there were also some studies within Asia that had higher carbon stock amounts than in Sitio Dicasalarain. One of the areas mentioned by the re-evaluation made by Keith et al. [28] was the lowland evergreen dipterocarp forest in Sebulu, East Kalimantan, Indonesia with carbon stock of 436 tons/hectare. This was not surprising since dipterocarp forests were known to have tall trees with large diameter especially in the East Kalimantan, Indonesia [29]. Furthermore, a study in the Sequoia sempervirens forests in the USA exhibited a total carbon stock of about 2201 tons/ha [30]. This is about 7 times of the CS of Sitio Dicasalarin. Another study in the temperate forests of South-eastern Australia yielded carbon stock amount of at least 550 tons/ha which is more than that of the CS in Baler, Aurora [31]. Thus, Sitio Dicasalarin, being a secondary growth tropical forest over ultramafic rocks, had more carbon stock than some areas within Asia only based on the studies mentioned.
The CS values of each quadrats varied from 2.7 to 83.48 tons with Quadrat 3 in Transect 2 having the highest carbon stock among all quadrats. The relationship of tree carbon stock between the basic parameters (species richness, species abundance, elevation) was tested in the regression analysis. The analysis of the relationship between tree carbon stock and key factors yielded the following results: a. species richness (r2 = 0.001), species abundance or count of tree individuals (r2 = 0.0067), and elevation (r2 = 0.0849) (Figures 4-6). As per the very low r2 values obtained, it was very clear that there are no significant relationships between tree carbon stock and to any of the key factors. Study of Liu et. al (2018) showed that there was no direct or significant relationship between tree species richness and belowground carbon (r2 = 0.32) and aboveground carbon (r2 = 0.39). The findings at Sitio Dicasalarin can also be supported by the research of Khadanga & Jakayumar [32] at the Mahendragiri Hill Forest. It was found in their study that species richness, elevation, and abundance had no significant effect to the biomass and carbon stock of the tree species in an area. Studies found that one of the best predictors and factors affecting CS is the amount of biomass as it has direct relationship with carbon stock [33]. Other factors in their study include the disturbance level of forests wherein high level of disturbance means less CS amount. Other factors affecting the amount of carbon stock of an area such as topographic factors (water flow, etc.) were not assessed in this study since there were no data collected on soils.
Two classifications of ecologically important species were included in the study, the Philippine endemics and threatened species. Forty-eight endemic and 29 threatened species out of the 139 morpho-species found within the area were listed either in IUCN or DAO 2017-11 (Table 3). These species had a total CS of 172.65 t ha−1 or 56.33% of the overall CS of the sampling area. As found in the study of Coracero and Malabrigo [34], the area was critically important because of having tremendous endemic and threatened species. These findings in carbon potential revealed that the area was also important in having high amount of stored carbon in tree species, especially in the endemics and threatened species.
Scientific Name | Family | IUCN Redlist | DAO 2017-11 | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | CR | CR | 68.60 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 27.62 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | VU | EN | 17.69 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | 9.46 | ||
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | VU | 7.49 | |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | EN | EN | 7.32 |
Lithocarpus apoensis (Elmer) Rehder | Fagaceae | VU | 6.55 | |
Garcinia rubra Merr. | Clusiaceae | 5.52 | ||
Discocalyx psychotrioides Elmer | Primulaceae | 4.52 | ||
Dillenia luzoniensis (Vidal) Merr. | Dilleniaceae | VU | 4.00 | |
Memecylon symplociforme Merr. | Memecylaceae | 3.66 | ||
Diospyros vera (Lour.) A.Chev. | Ebenaceae | EN | VU | 2.95 |
Homalium bracteatum Benth. | Proteaceae | 2.89 | ||
Actinodaphne dolichophylla (Merr.) Merr. | Lauraceae | 1.89 | ||
Trigonostemon longipes (Merr.) Merr. | Euphorbiaceae | 1.66 | ||
Weinmannia luzoniensis S.Vidal | Cunoniaceae | 1.65 | ||
Hopea acuminata Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | EN | 1.51 |
Hopea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 1.26 |
Artocarpus blancoi (Elmer) Merr. | Moraceae | 1.23 | ||
Podocarpus macrocarpus de Laub. | Podocarpaceae | EN | EN | 1.10 |
Sindora supa Merr. | Fabaceaea | EN | EN | 1.06 |
Brackenridgea fascicularis (Blanco) Fern.-Vill. | Ochnaceae | 1.04 | ||
Artocarpus rubrovenius Warb. | Moraceae | 1.04 | ||
Myrsine fastigiata (Elmer) Pipoly | Primulaceae | 0.57 | ||
Radermachera coriacea Merr. | Bignoniaceae | VU | 0.50 | |
Shorea polysperma Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 0.48 |
Syzygium ramosii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.38 | ||
Greeniopsis discolor Merr. | Rubiaceae | CR | 0.38 | |
Mitrephora multifolia Elmer ex Weeras. & R.M.K.Saunders Elmer | Annonaceae | 0.31 | ||
Discocalyx micrantha Merr. | Primulaceae | 0.26 | ||
Diospyros pilosanthera Blanco | Ebenaceae | EN | 0.23 | |
Cinnamomum mercadoi S.Vidal | Lauraceae | VU | OTS | 0.21 |
Psychotria luzoniensis (Cham. & Schltdl.) Fern.-Vill. | Rubiaceae | 0.20 | ||
Cinnamomum nanophyllum Kosterm. | Lauraceae | 0.19 | ||
Canthium obovatifolium (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.19 | ||
Palaquium glabrum Merr. | Sapotaceae | 0.12 | ||
Myristica colinridsdalei W.J.de Wilde | Myristicaceae | VU | CR | 0.12 |
Guioa discolor Radlk. | Sapindaceae | EN | VU | 0.12 |
Canthium subcapitatum (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.11 | ||
Kibatalia elmeri Woodson | Apocynaceae | VU | OTS | 0.11 |
Helicia rigidiflora var robusta | Proteaceae | 0.09 | ||
Litsea leytensis Merr. | Lauraceae | VU | EN | 0.08 |
Syzygium curranii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.07 | ||
Chionanthus remotinervius (Merr.) Kiew | Oleaceae | 0.03 | ||
Ficus balete Merr. | Moraceae | 0.03 | ||
Osmoxylon eminens (W.Bull) Philipson | Araliaceae | 0.01 | ||
Adenanthera intermedia Merr. | Fabaceaea | VU | OTS | 0.01 |
Madhuca lenceolata (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | EN | 0.01 | |
TOTAL | 186.51 or 172.65 tons/ha | |||
*Legend: CR - Critically endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, OTS - Other threatened species. |
Top ten species when it comes to amount of carbon stored were identified (Table 4). These species had a total of 212.27 t ha−1 which is equivalent to 64.11% of the total carbon stock of all recorded species in the area. X. philippinensis (Bagoadlau) topped with 68.60 t ha−1 or 20.72% of the total CS of all species. Bagoadlau was found to be the second most important species in Sitio Dicasalarin next to Dangula in terms of importance values [34]. But in terms of carbon stock, Dangula was only the second highest storeroom of carbon in the area. There are more large diameter individuals of Bagoadlau than Dangula, which affected the estimated carbon stock.
Scientific Name | Family | Common Name | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | Bagoadlao | 68.60 |
Teijsmanniodendron ahernianum (Merr.) Bakh. | Lamiaceae | Sasalit | 28.41 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | Yakal Malibato | 27.62 |
Palaquium obovatum (Griff.) Engl. | Sapotaceae | Lahas | 23.68 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | Malabetis | 17.69 |
Aglaia edulis (Roxb.) Wall. | Meliaceae | Malasaging | 11.44 |
Calophyllum blancoi Planch. & Triana | Calophyllaceae | Bitanghol | 10.54 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | Tiga | 9.46 |
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | Pahutan | 7.49 |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | Malaputat | 7.32 |
TOTAL | - | - | 212.27 |
Sitio Dicasalarin is a very important area in terms of having a lot of endemic and threatened species with exceptional carbon storage capacity. Locally and in some parts of Asia, the amount of carbon stored by the tree species in the area is relatively high but is less than the amount of carbon stock in other studies within Asia and in the USA and Australia. Carbon stock potentials of tree species were not affected by any of the factors tested (species richness, species abundance, and elevation). The findings of this study is a pioneer research on carbon storage potential assessment in Baler, Aurora inclusive of the ecologically important species (threatened and endemics) that can serve as a guide in planning conservation and protection efforts by public and private agencies.
The authors are very thankful to the late Senator Edgardo Angara for allowing the conduct of the diversity research in his property. E.E. Coracero would like to express his gratitude to Forester Denis Pulan and Prof. Pastor Malabrigo, Jr. for the guidance and verification of the plant identity. Also, sincerest appreciation is given to Forester Mark John Suniega for plotting and designing the location map of the study site. This study will also not be possible without the help and support from the faculty and staff of Aurora State College of Technology, Baler, Aurora Campus especially from Dr. Eutiquio L. Rotaquio, Jr. (College President).
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | Nijnik M (2010) Carbon capture and storage in forests. Iss Environment Sci Tech 29: 203-238. |
[2] | FAO (2015) FAO assessment of forests and carbon stocks, 1990-2015. |
[3] | Whitehead D (2011) Forests as carbon sinks - Benefits and consequences. Tree physiol 31: 893-902. |
[4] | Pragasan A (2015) Tree Carbon Stock Assessment from the Tropical Forests of Bodamalai Hills Located in India. Journal of Earth Sci Climatic Change 6. |
[5] | Álvarez-Yépiz J, Dovčiak M (2015) Enhancing Ecosystem Function through Conservation: Threatened Plants Increase Local Carbon Storage in Tropical Dry Forests. Trop Conserv Sci 8: 999-1008. |
[6] | Deree N, Guillera-Arroita G, Baking E, et al. (2017) High Carbon Stock forests provide co-benefits for tropical biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 55: 997-1008. |
[7] | Mehrabian A, Sayadi S, Majidi Kuhbenani M, et al. (2020) Priorities for conservation of endemic trees and shrubs of Iran: Important Plant Areas (IPAs) and Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) in SW Asia. J Asia-Pacific Biodivers 13: 295-305. |
[8] | van der Werff H, Consiglio T (2004) Distribution and conservation significance of endemic species of flowering plants in Peru. Biodivers Conserv 13: 1699-1713. |
[9] | Walpole P (2010) Figuring the forest figures: Understanding forest cover data in the Philippines and where we might be proceeding. |
[10] | Lillo E, Fernando E, Lillo M (2019) Plant diversity and structure of forest habitat types on Dinagat Island, Philippines. J Asia-Pacific Biodivers 12: 83-105. |
[11] | Muniyappa K, Nandini N (2013) Review - Importance of Assessing Carbon Sequestration Potential in Forest and Urban Areas. Life S Leaflets 5: 78-88. |
[12] | van der Ploeg J, Masipiqueña AB, Bernardo EC (2003) The Sierra Madre Mountain range: global relevance, local realities. Tuguegarao City, Philippines: Cagayan Valley Program on Environment and Development |
[13] | Duaso M (2010) Aurora Provincial Profile CY 2009. |
[14] | ESRI (2020) Location[basemap]. 1: 20000. Location map of the study site in Sitio Dicasalarin, Province of Aurora in the Philippines. |
[15] | IUCN (2017) The IUCN Redlist of Threatened Species 2017-3. |
[16] | DENR (2017) DAO 2017-11. |
[17] | Pelser B, JF Barcelona, DL Nickrent (2011) Co's Digital Flora of the Philippines. www.philippineplants.org. |
[18] | Pragasan L (2020) Tree carbon stock and its relationship to key factors from a tropical hill forest of Tamil Nadu, India. Geol Ecol Landscapes. |
[19] | Borah N, Nath A, Das A (2013) Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Stocks of Tree Species in Tropical Forests of Cachar District, Assam, Northeast India. International J Ecol Environ Sci 39: 97-106. |
[20] | Sarstedt M, Mooi E (2014) Regression Analysis, In: A Concise Guide to Market Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
[21] | Labata M, Aranico E, Tabaranza A, et al. (2012) Carbon stock assessment of three selected agroforestry systems in Bukidnon, Philippines. Advances Environ Sci 4: 5-11. |
[22] | Pansit N (2015) Carbon Storage and Sequestration Potential of Urban Trees in Cebu City, Philippines. Mindanao J Sci Technol 17: 98-111. |
[23] | Tulod A (2015) Carbon stocks of second growth forest and reforestation stands in Southern Philippines: baseline for carbon sequestration monitoring. AES Bioflux 7: 422-431. |
[24] | Lasco R, Pulhin F (2003) Philippine forest ecosystems and climate change: Carbon stocks, rate of sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol. Ann Tropical Res 25: 37-51. |
[25] | Liu X, Trogisch S, He J, et al. (2018) Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proc R Soc 285: 1-9. |
[26] | Ibrahim M, Isah A, Shamaki S, et al. (2018) Carbon Stock Assessment in Majiya Fuelwood Reserve, Sokoto State- Nigeria. J Sci Res R 18: 1-12. |
[27] | Pradhan A, Mishra S, Behera N (2016) Species diversity and biomass carbon analysis of the tree layer in a sacred natural forest patch from Western Odisha. Int J Environ Sci 7: 113-122. |
[28] | Keith H, Mackey B, Lindenmayer D (2009) Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. P Natl A Sci 106: 11635-11640. |
[29] | Yamakura T, Hagihara A, Sukardjo S, et al. (1986) Tree Size in a Mature Dipterocarp Forest Stand in Sebulu, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. 東南アジア研究23: 452-478. |
[30] | Sillett S, Van Pelt R, Carroll A, et al. (2020) Aboveground biomass dynamics and growth efficiency of Sequoia sempervirens forests. Forest Ecology Management 458: 1-43. |
[31] | Fedrigo M, Kasel S, Bennett L, et al. (2014) Carbon stocks in temperate forests of south-eastern Australia reflect large tree distribution and edaphic conditions. Forest Ecology Management 334: 129-143. |
[32] | Gebeheyu, G., Soromessa, T., Bekele, T. & Teketay, D. (2019). Carbon stocks and factors affecting their storage in dry Afromontane forests of Awi Zone, northwestern Ethiopia. J Ecol Environ 43. |
[33] | Khadanga SS, Jayakumar S (2020) Tree biomass and carbon stock: understanding the role of species richness, elevation, and disturbance. Trop Ecol 61: 128-141. |
[34] | Coracero EE, Malabrigo PJL (2020) Diversity Assessment of Tree Species in Sitio Dicasalarin, Barangay Zabali, Baler, Aurora, Philippines. Open J Ecol 10: 717-728. |
1. | Hazrat Bilal, Eric C. Okonkwo, Tareq Al-Ansari, A pathway to 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emission by 2030 using GIS-Based multi-criteria decision making for renewables, date palm (phoenix dactylifera), and carbon credits: a case for Qatar, 2024, 12, 2296-598X, 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1272993 | |
2. | Jeco Jed Ruales, Jess Jumawan, Geospatial Distribution Pattern of Xanthostemon F. Muell. Species (Iron Wood) in the Philippines Based on Updated Literature and Internet Digital Checklist Platforms, 2023, 2782-8522, 42, 10.54610/jeseg/5.1.2023.005 | |
3. | Christian Ofalla Llait, Tree Species Composition and Diversity in a Secondary Forest along the Sierra Madre Mountain Range in Central Luzon, Philippines: Implications for the Conservation of Endemic, Native, and Threatened Plants, 2024, 5, 2673-5636, 51, 10.3390/jzbg5010004 | |
4. | Ma. Ellenita Gibe De Castro, Jenielyn Padrones, Katrina Boco, Vegetation diversity as a factor in carbon sequestration and storage: examples from the ultramafic forests in Palawan Island, Philippines, 2025, 12, 2502-2458, 7009, 10.15243/jdmlm.2025.122.7009 |
Transect | Quadrat | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation (masl) |
1 | 0 | 15.73213 | 121.6337 | 153.2 |
1 | 1 | 15.73009 | 121.6337 | 171.9 |
1 | 2 | 15.72863 | 121.6343 | 200.5 |
1 | 3 | 15.72678 | 121.6348 | 227.3 |
1 | 4 | 15.72583 | 121.6349 | 247.7 |
1 | 5 | 15.72477 | 121.6348 | 265.6 |
1 | 6 | 15.72356 | 121.6348 | 293.3 |
1 | 7 | 15.72211 | 121.6346 | 313.1 |
1 | 8 | 15.72133 | 121.6333 | 320.5 |
2 | 0 | 15.74697 | 121.6302 | 170.8 |
2 | 1 | 15.74603 | 121.6294 | 202.1 |
2 | 2 | 15.74543 | 121.6285 | 231.4 |
2 | 3 | 15.74436 | 121.6282 | 253.5 |
2 | 4 | 15.74536 | 121.6258 | 252.1 |
2 | 5 | 15.74437 | 121.625 | 263.6 |
2 | 6 | 15.74401 | 121.624 | 259 |
2 | 7 | 15.74418 | 121.6228 | 256.4 |
2 | 8 | 15.74448 | 121.6213 | 260.2 |
3 | 0 | 15.73588 | 121.6344 | 21.6 |
3 | 1 | 15.73485 | 121.636 | 26.5 |
3 | 2 | 15.73318 | 121.6364 | 39.9 |
3 | 3 | 15.73099 | 121.6368 | 72.1 |
3 | 4 | 15.7308 | 121.6367 | 73.4 |
3 | 5 | 15.72989 | 121.6373 | 94.9 |
3 | 6 | 15.72937 | 121.6383 | 105 |
3 | 7 | 15.72837 | 121.6383 | 104.3 |
3 | 8 | 15.72743 | 121.6384 | 109.7 |
Species Richness | Species Abundance | Carbon Stock | |
Transect 1 | 88 | 699 | 100.69 tons |
Transect 2 | 79 | 934 | 160.82 tons |
Transect 3 | 85 | 606 | 69.57 tons |
OVERALL | 139 | 2239 | 331.08 tons or 306.48 t ha−1 |
Scientific Name | Family | IUCN Redlist | DAO 2017-11 | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | CR | CR | 68.60 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 27.62 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | VU | EN | 17.69 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | 9.46 | ||
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | VU | 7.49 | |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | EN | EN | 7.32 |
Lithocarpus apoensis (Elmer) Rehder | Fagaceae | VU | 6.55 | |
Garcinia rubra Merr. | Clusiaceae | 5.52 | ||
Discocalyx psychotrioides Elmer | Primulaceae | 4.52 | ||
Dillenia luzoniensis (Vidal) Merr. | Dilleniaceae | VU | 4.00 | |
Memecylon symplociforme Merr. | Memecylaceae | 3.66 | ||
Diospyros vera (Lour.) A.Chev. | Ebenaceae | EN | VU | 2.95 |
Homalium bracteatum Benth. | Proteaceae | 2.89 | ||
Actinodaphne dolichophylla (Merr.) Merr. | Lauraceae | 1.89 | ||
Trigonostemon longipes (Merr.) Merr. | Euphorbiaceae | 1.66 | ||
Weinmannia luzoniensis S.Vidal | Cunoniaceae | 1.65 | ||
Hopea acuminata Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | EN | 1.51 |
Hopea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 1.26 |
Artocarpus blancoi (Elmer) Merr. | Moraceae | 1.23 | ||
Podocarpus macrocarpus de Laub. | Podocarpaceae | EN | EN | 1.10 |
Sindora supa Merr. | Fabaceaea | EN | EN | 1.06 |
Brackenridgea fascicularis (Blanco) Fern.-Vill. | Ochnaceae | 1.04 | ||
Artocarpus rubrovenius Warb. | Moraceae | 1.04 | ||
Myrsine fastigiata (Elmer) Pipoly | Primulaceae | 0.57 | ||
Radermachera coriacea Merr. | Bignoniaceae | VU | 0.50 | |
Shorea polysperma Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 0.48 |
Syzygium ramosii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.38 | ||
Greeniopsis discolor Merr. | Rubiaceae | CR | 0.38 | |
Mitrephora multifolia Elmer ex Weeras. & R.M.K.Saunders Elmer | Annonaceae | 0.31 | ||
Discocalyx micrantha Merr. | Primulaceae | 0.26 | ||
Diospyros pilosanthera Blanco | Ebenaceae | EN | 0.23 | |
Cinnamomum mercadoi S.Vidal | Lauraceae | VU | OTS | 0.21 |
Psychotria luzoniensis (Cham. & Schltdl.) Fern.-Vill. | Rubiaceae | 0.20 | ||
Cinnamomum nanophyllum Kosterm. | Lauraceae | 0.19 | ||
Canthium obovatifolium (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.19 | ||
Palaquium glabrum Merr. | Sapotaceae | 0.12 | ||
Myristica colinridsdalei W.J.de Wilde | Myristicaceae | VU | CR | 0.12 |
Guioa discolor Radlk. | Sapindaceae | EN | VU | 0.12 |
Canthium subcapitatum (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.11 | ||
Kibatalia elmeri Woodson | Apocynaceae | VU | OTS | 0.11 |
Helicia rigidiflora var robusta | Proteaceae | 0.09 | ||
Litsea leytensis Merr. | Lauraceae | VU | EN | 0.08 |
Syzygium curranii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.07 | ||
Chionanthus remotinervius (Merr.) Kiew | Oleaceae | 0.03 | ||
Ficus balete Merr. | Moraceae | 0.03 | ||
Osmoxylon eminens (W.Bull) Philipson | Araliaceae | 0.01 | ||
Adenanthera intermedia Merr. | Fabaceaea | VU | OTS | 0.01 |
Madhuca lenceolata (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | EN | 0.01 | |
TOTAL | 186.51 or 172.65 tons/ha | |||
*Legend: CR - Critically endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, OTS - Other threatened species. |
Scientific Name | Family | Common Name | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | Bagoadlao | 68.60 |
Teijsmanniodendron ahernianum (Merr.) Bakh. | Lamiaceae | Sasalit | 28.41 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | Yakal Malibato | 27.62 |
Palaquium obovatum (Griff.) Engl. | Sapotaceae | Lahas | 23.68 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | Malabetis | 17.69 |
Aglaia edulis (Roxb.) Wall. | Meliaceae | Malasaging | 11.44 |
Calophyllum blancoi Planch. & Triana | Calophyllaceae | Bitanghol | 10.54 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | Tiga | 9.46 |
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | Pahutan | 7.49 |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | Malaputat | 7.32 |
TOTAL | - | - | 212.27 |
Transect | Quadrat | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation (masl) |
1 | 0 | 15.73213 | 121.6337 | 153.2 |
1 | 1 | 15.73009 | 121.6337 | 171.9 |
1 | 2 | 15.72863 | 121.6343 | 200.5 |
1 | 3 | 15.72678 | 121.6348 | 227.3 |
1 | 4 | 15.72583 | 121.6349 | 247.7 |
1 | 5 | 15.72477 | 121.6348 | 265.6 |
1 | 6 | 15.72356 | 121.6348 | 293.3 |
1 | 7 | 15.72211 | 121.6346 | 313.1 |
1 | 8 | 15.72133 | 121.6333 | 320.5 |
2 | 0 | 15.74697 | 121.6302 | 170.8 |
2 | 1 | 15.74603 | 121.6294 | 202.1 |
2 | 2 | 15.74543 | 121.6285 | 231.4 |
2 | 3 | 15.74436 | 121.6282 | 253.5 |
2 | 4 | 15.74536 | 121.6258 | 252.1 |
2 | 5 | 15.74437 | 121.625 | 263.6 |
2 | 6 | 15.74401 | 121.624 | 259 |
2 | 7 | 15.74418 | 121.6228 | 256.4 |
2 | 8 | 15.74448 | 121.6213 | 260.2 |
3 | 0 | 15.73588 | 121.6344 | 21.6 |
3 | 1 | 15.73485 | 121.636 | 26.5 |
3 | 2 | 15.73318 | 121.6364 | 39.9 |
3 | 3 | 15.73099 | 121.6368 | 72.1 |
3 | 4 | 15.7308 | 121.6367 | 73.4 |
3 | 5 | 15.72989 | 121.6373 | 94.9 |
3 | 6 | 15.72937 | 121.6383 | 105 |
3 | 7 | 15.72837 | 121.6383 | 104.3 |
3 | 8 | 15.72743 | 121.6384 | 109.7 |
Species Richness | Species Abundance | Carbon Stock | |
Transect 1 | 88 | 699 | 100.69 tons |
Transect 2 | 79 | 934 | 160.82 tons |
Transect 3 | 85 | 606 | 69.57 tons |
OVERALL | 139 | 2239 | 331.08 tons or 306.48 t ha−1 |
Scientific Name | Family | IUCN Redlist | DAO 2017-11 | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | CR | CR | 68.60 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 27.62 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | VU | EN | 17.69 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | 9.46 | ||
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | VU | 7.49 | |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | EN | EN | 7.32 |
Lithocarpus apoensis (Elmer) Rehder | Fagaceae | VU | 6.55 | |
Garcinia rubra Merr. | Clusiaceae | 5.52 | ||
Discocalyx psychotrioides Elmer | Primulaceae | 4.52 | ||
Dillenia luzoniensis (Vidal) Merr. | Dilleniaceae | VU | 4.00 | |
Memecylon symplociforme Merr. | Memecylaceae | 3.66 | ||
Diospyros vera (Lour.) A.Chev. | Ebenaceae | EN | VU | 2.95 |
Homalium bracteatum Benth. | Proteaceae | 2.89 | ||
Actinodaphne dolichophylla (Merr.) Merr. | Lauraceae | 1.89 | ||
Trigonostemon longipes (Merr.) Merr. | Euphorbiaceae | 1.66 | ||
Weinmannia luzoniensis S.Vidal | Cunoniaceae | 1.65 | ||
Hopea acuminata Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | EN | 1.51 |
Hopea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 1.26 |
Artocarpus blancoi (Elmer) Merr. | Moraceae | 1.23 | ||
Podocarpus macrocarpus de Laub. | Podocarpaceae | EN | EN | 1.10 |
Sindora supa Merr. | Fabaceaea | EN | EN | 1.06 |
Brackenridgea fascicularis (Blanco) Fern.-Vill. | Ochnaceae | 1.04 | ||
Artocarpus rubrovenius Warb. | Moraceae | 1.04 | ||
Myrsine fastigiata (Elmer) Pipoly | Primulaceae | 0.57 | ||
Radermachera coriacea Merr. | Bignoniaceae | VU | 0.50 | |
Shorea polysperma Merr. | Dipterocarpaceae | CR | CR | 0.48 |
Syzygium ramosii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.38 | ||
Greeniopsis discolor Merr. | Rubiaceae | CR | 0.38 | |
Mitrephora multifolia Elmer ex Weeras. & R.M.K.Saunders Elmer | Annonaceae | 0.31 | ||
Discocalyx micrantha Merr. | Primulaceae | 0.26 | ||
Diospyros pilosanthera Blanco | Ebenaceae | EN | 0.23 | |
Cinnamomum mercadoi S.Vidal | Lauraceae | VU | OTS | 0.21 |
Psychotria luzoniensis (Cham. & Schltdl.) Fern.-Vill. | Rubiaceae | 0.20 | ||
Cinnamomum nanophyllum Kosterm. | Lauraceae | 0.19 | ||
Canthium obovatifolium (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.19 | ||
Palaquium glabrum Merr. | Sapotaceae | 0.12 | ||
Myristica colinridsdalei W.J.de Wilde | Myristicaceae | VU | CR | 0.12 |
Guioa discolor Radlk. | Sapindaceae | EN | VU | 0.12 |
Canthium subcapitatum (Merr.) Merr. | Rubiaceae | 0.11 | ||
Kibatalia elmeri Woodson | Apocynaceae | VU | OTS | 0.11 |
Helicia rigidiflora var robusta | Proteaceae | 0.09 | ||
Litsea leytensis Merr. | Lauraceae | VU | EN | 0.08 |
Syzygium curranii (C.B.Rob.) Merr. | Myrtaceae | 0.07 | ||
Chionanthus remotinervius (Merr.) Kiew | Oleaceae | 0.03 | ||
Ficus balete Merr. | Moraceae | 0.03 | ||
Osmoxylon eminens (W.Bull) Philipson | Araliaceae | 0.01 | ||
Adenanthera intermedia Merr. | Fabaceaea | VU | OTS | 0.01 |
Madhuca lenceolata (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | EN | 0.01 | |
TOTAL | 186.51 or 172.65 tons/ha | |||
*Legend: CR - Critically endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, OTS - Other threatened species. |
Scientific Name | Family | Common Name | Carbon Stock (t ha−1) |
Xanthostemon philippinensis Merr. | Myrtaceae | Bagoadlao | 68.60 |
Teijsmanniodendron ahernianum (Merr.) Bakh. | Lamiaceae | Sasalit | 28.41 |
Shorea malibato Foxw. | Dipterocarpaceae | Yakal Malibato | 27.62 |
Palaquium obovatum (Griff.) Engl. | Sapotaceae | Lahas | 23.68 |
Madhuca oblongifolia (Merr.) Merr. | Sapotaceae | Malabetis | 17.69 |
Aglaia edulis (Roxb.) Wall. | Meliaceae | Malasaging | 11.44 |
Calophyllum blancoi Planch. & Triana | Calophyllaceae | Bitanghol | 10.54 |
Tristaniopsis micrantha (Merr.) Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. | Myrtaceae | Tiga | 9.46 |
Mangifera altissima Blanco | Anacardiaceae | Pahutan | 7.49 |
Terminalia darlingii Merr. | Combretaceae | Malaputat | 7.32 |
TOTAL | - | - | 212.27 |