Search Advanced

AIMS Energy

2018, Volume 6, Issue 6: 979-992. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.6.979
Previous Article Next Article
Review Special Issues

Bioethanol synthesis for fuel or beverages from the processing of agri-food by-products and natural biomass using economical and purposely modified biocatalytic systems

  • Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK
  • Received: 05 September 2018 Accepted: 11 November 2018 Published: 14 November 2018

  • This review describes the role of suitable and modified microorganisms as economical biocatalysts in the processing of by-products generated in industries and agriculture, which are cheaply available globally as renewable resources. Since the microbial processing can be economically used to produce a variety of value-added products, by employing specific species of microorganisms as biocatalysts; but to be specific to the title of this review the information included in this article has only emphasized on one important consumer-product bioethanol. The conclusion of the information gathered in this review is that, the selection and modification of a microbial biocatalyst should be strategically done. For example: employing an yeast strain of Saccharomyces or a non-Saccharomyces culture, is important in bioethanol synthesis; the optimisation of biocatalyst is also important according to the type of material being processed in the system as it could be a by-product or waste residue of agriculture, food & beverage industry or simply the seasonal locally available fruits. The other information, which has been included in this review, is on the modification of biocatalysts and important factors influencing the efficiency of bioprocessing, for the necessity of economical yield of bioethanol.

    Citation: Divakar Dahiya, Poonam Singh Nigam. Bioethanol synthesis for fuel or beverages from the processing of agri-food by-products and natural biomass using economical and purposely modified biocatalytic systems[J]. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(6): 979-992. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.6.979

    Related Papers:

  • This review describes the role of suitable and modified microorganisms as economical biocatalysts in the processing of by-products generated in industries and agriculture, which are cheaply available globally as renewable resources. Since the microbial processing can be economically used to produce a variety of value-added products, by employing specific species of microorganisms as biocatalysts; but to be specific to the title of this review the information included in this article has only emphasized on one important consumer-product bioethanol. The conclusion of the information gathered in this review is that, the selection and modification of a microbial biocatalyst should be strategically done. For example: employing an yeast strain of Saccharomyces or a non-Saccharomyces culture, is important in bioethanol synthesis; the optimisation of biocatalyst is also important according to the type of material being processed in the system as it could be a by-product or waste residue of agriculture, food & beverage industry or simply the seasonal locally available fruits. The other information, which has been included in this review, is on the modification of biocatalysts and important factors influencing the efficiency of bioprocessing, for the necessity of economical yield of bioethanol.


    加载中
    [1] Procentese A, Raganati F, Olivieri G, et al. (2017) Renewable feedstocks for biobutanol production by fermentation. New Biotechnol 39: 135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.10.010
    [2] Procentese A, Johnsona E, Orr V, et al. (2015) Deep eutectic solvent pretreatment and subsequent saccharification of corncob. Bioresource Technol 192: 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.053
    [3] Procentese A, Raganati F, Olivieri G, et al. (2018) Deep Eutectic Solvents pretreatment of agro-industrial food waste. Biotechnol Biofuels 11: 37. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1034-y
    [4] Nigam P (2000) Wines: Specific aspects of oenology, In: Robinson RK, Batt CA, Patel PD, Eds., Encyclopaedia of Food Microbiology, London: Academic Press, 2316–2323.
    [5] Nigam P (2011) Microbiology of winemaking, In: Joshi VK, Ed., Handbook of Enology: Principles and Practices, Delhi: Asiatech, 383–404.
    [6] Nigam P (2011) Wines: Production of Special Wines, In: Batt CA, Tortorello ML, Eds., Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Elsevier Ltd, UK: Academic Press, 793–799.
    [7] Banat IM, Nigam P, Singh D, et al. (1998) Ethanol production at elevated temperatures and bioethanol concentrations: Part I-yeasts in general. World J Microb Biot 14: 809–821. doi: 10.1023/A:1008802704374
    [8] Banat IM, Nigam P, Singh D, et al. (1998) Ethanol production using thermo-tolerant/thermophilic yeast strains: Potential future exploitation, In: Pandey A, Ed., Advances in Biotechnology, Educational Publishers & Distributors N, Delhi, India, 105–119.
    [9] Farrell EA, Bustard M, Gough G, et al. (1998) Ethanol Production at 45 oC by Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 during growth on molasses pre-treated with Amberliteâ and non-living biomass. Bioproc Eng 19: 217–219.
    [10] Yadav BS, Rani U, Dhamija SS, et al. (1996) Process optimization for continuous ethanol fermentation by alginate-immobilized cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HAU-1. J Basic Microb 36: 205–210. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620360307
    [11] Sheoran A, Yadav BS, Nigam P, et al. (1998) Continuous ethanol production from sugarcane molasses using a column reactor of immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae HAU-1. J Basic Microb 38: 123–128. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4028(199805)38:2<123::AID-JOBM123>3.0.CO;2-9
    [12] Gough S, Brady D, Nigam P, et al. (1997) Production of ethanol from molasses at 45 oC using alginate-immobilized Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3. Bioproc Eng 16: 389–392.
    [13] Abdel-Fattah WR, Fadil M, Nigam P, et al. (2000) Isolation of thermotolerant ethanologenic yeasts and use of selected strains in industrial scale fermentation in an Egyptian distillery. Biotechnol Bioeng 68: 531–535. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000605)68:5<531::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-Y
    [14] Singh D, Banat IM, Nigam P, et al. (1998) Industrial scale ethanol production using the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 in an Indian distillery. Biotechnol Lett 20: 753–755. doi: 10.1023/A:1005390804500
    [15] Kourkoutas Y, Dimitropoulou S, Kanellaki M, et al. (2002) High-temperature bioethanolic fermentation of whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 yeast immobilized on delignified cellulosic material. Bioresource Technol 82: 177–181. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00159-6
    [16] Kourkoutas Y, Dimitropoulou S, Marchant R, et al. (2001) Whey liquid waste of dairy industry as raw material for fermentation with thermophilic K. marxianus. In: Proc of 7th Intl Conf Env Sci Technol, Univ Algean: Lekkas TD Ed Global Nest, 226–233.
    [17] Koutinas AA, Sypsas V, Kandylis P, et al. (2012) Nano-Tubular Cellulose for Bioprocess Technology Development. PLoS One 7: e34350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034350
    [18] Brady D, Nigam P, Marchant R, et al. (1997) Ethanol production at 45 oC by alginate-immobilized Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 during growth on lactose-containing media. Bioproc Eng 16: 101–104. doi: 10.1007/PL00008941
    [19] Brady D, Nigam P, Marchant R, et al. (1996) Ethanol production at 45 oC by Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized in magnetically responsive alginate matrices. Biotechnol Lett 18: 1213–1216. doi: 10.1007/BF00128595
    [20] Brady D, Nigam P, Marchant R, et al. (1997) The effect of Mn2+ on ethanol production from lactose using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized in magnetically responsive matrices. Bioproc Eng 17: 31–34.
    [21] Aggarwal NK, Nigam P, Singh D, et al. (2001) Process optimization for the production of sugar for the bioethanol industry from Tapioca, a non-conventional source of starch. World J Microb Biot 17:783–787. doi: 10.1023/A:1013500602881
    [22] Aggarwal NK, Nigam P, Singh D, et al. (2001) Process optimization for the production of sugar for the bioethanol industry from sorghum, a non-conventional source of starch. World J Microb Biot 17: 411–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1016791809948
    [23] Nigam P, Pandey A (2009) =Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial-Residues-Utilisation Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-9941-0; e-ISBN: 978-1-4020-9942-7.
    [24] Sánchez A, Coton M, Coton E, et al. (2012) Prevalent lactic acid bacteria in cider cellars and efficiency of Oenococcus oeni strains. Food Microbiol 32: 32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.02.008
    [25] Sánchez A, Rodríguez R, Coton M, et al. (2010) Population dynamics of lactic acid bacteria during spontaneous malolactic fermentation in industrial cider. Food Res Int 43: 2101–2107. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.07.010
    [26] Herrero M, Laca A, Garcı́a LA, et al. (2001) Controlled malolactic fermentation in cider using Oenococcus oeni immobilized in alginate beads and comparison with free cell fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol 28: 35–41. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00265-9
    [27] Valles BS, Bedriñana RP, Tascón NF, et al. (2007) Yeast species associated with the spontaneous fermentation of cider. Food Microbiol 24: 25–31.
    [28] Nedovic VA, Durieuxb A, Nedervelde LV, et al. (2000) Continuous cider fermentation with co-immobilized yeast and Leuconostoc oenos cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 26: 834–839. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00179-4
    [29] Joshi VK, Bhardwaj JC (2011) ffect of different cultivars yeasts (free and immobilized cultures) of S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe on physico-chemical and sensory quality of plum based wine for sparkling wine production. Int J Food Ferment Technol 1: 69–81.
    [30] Joshi VK, Sharma PC, Attri BL (1991) A note on the deacidification activity of Schizosaccharomyces pombe in plum musts of variable composition. J Appl Microbiol 70: 386–390.
    [31] Lee PR, Kho HSC, Yu B, et al. (2013) Yeast ratio is a critical factor for sequential fermentation of papaya wine by Williopsis saturnus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Biotechnol 6: 385–393. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12008
    [32] Varakumar S, Naresh K, Reddy OVS (2012) Rreparation of mango wine using a new yeast-mango-peel immobilized biocatalyst system. Czech J Food Sci 30: 557–566. doi: 10.17221/478/2011-CJFS
    [33] Oliveira MES, Pantoj L, Duarte WF, et al. (2011) Fruit wine produced from cagaita (Eugenia dysenterica DC) by both free and immobilised yeast cell fermentation. Food Res Int 44: 2391–2400. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.028
    [34] Banat I, Nigam P, Marchant R (1992) Isolation of thermo-tolerant, fermentative yeasts growing at 52 oC and producing ethanol at 45 oC and 50 oC. World J Microb Biot 8: 259–263. doi: 10.1007/BF01201874
    [35] Singh D, Nigam P, Banat IM, et al. (1998) Ethanol production at elevated temperatures and bioethanol concentrations: Part II-use of Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3. World J Microb Biot 14: 823–834. doi: 10.1023/A:1008852424846
    [36] Ganatsios V, Koutinas AA, Bekatorou A, et al (2014)Promotion of maltose fermentation at extremely low temperatures using a cryotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain immobilised on porous cellulosic material. Enzyme Microb Technol 66: 56–59.
    [37] Toit MD, Engelbrecht L, Lerm E, et al. (2011) Lactobacillus: The Next Generation of Malolactic Fermentation Starter Cultures-an Overview. Food Bioproc Technol 4: 876–906. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0448-8
    [38] Genisheva Z, Mussatto SI, Oliveira JM, et al. (2013) Malolactic fermentation of wines with immobilised lactic acid bacteria-influence of concentration, type of support material and storage conditions. Food Chem 138: 1510–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.058
    [39] Riordan C, Love G, Barron N, et al. (1996) Production of ethanol from sucrose at 45 oC by alginate-immobilized preparations of the thermotolerant yeast strain Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3. Bioresource Technol 55: 171–173. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00163-8
    [40] Nigam P, Banat IM, Singh D, et al. (1997) Continuous ethanol production by thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized on mineral Kissiris at 45 oC. World J Microb Biot 13: 283–288. doi: 10.1023/A:1018578806605
    [41] Love G, Gough S, Brady D, et al. (1998) Continuous ethanol fermentation at 45 oC using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized in Calcium alginate and kissiris. Bioproc Eng 18: 187–189.
    [42] Love G, Nigam P, Barron N, et al. (1996) Ethanol production at 45 oC using preparations of Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized in calcium alginate and kissiris. Bioproc Eng 15: 275–277. doi: 10.1007/BF02391589
    [43] Agouridis N, Bekatorou A, Nigam P, et al. (2005) Malolactic fermentation in wine with Lactobacillus caseicells immobilized on delignified cellulosic material. J Agric Food Chem 53: 2546–2551. doi: 10.1021/jf048736t
    [44] Ciani M (2008) Continuous deacidification of wine by immobilized Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells: Evaluation of malic acid degradation rate and analytical profiles. J Appl Microbiol 79: 631–634.
    [45] Singh D, Dahiya J, Nigam P (1995) Simultaneous raw starch hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation by glucoamylase from Rhizoctonia solani and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Basic Microb 35: 117–121. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620350209
    [46] Servetas I, Berbegal C, Camacho N, et al. (2013) Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Oenococcus oeni immobilized in different layers of a cellulose/starch gel composite for simultaneous bioethanolic and malolactic wine fermentations. Process Biochem 48: 1279–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.06.020
    [47] Verma G, Nigam P, Singh D, et al. (2000) Bioconversion of starch to ethanol in a single-step process by coculture of amylolytic yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 21. Bioresource Technol 72: 261–266. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00117-0
    [48] Wati L, Dhamija SS, Singh D, et al. (1996) Characterisation of genetic control of thermotolerance in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Eng Biotechnol 16: 19–26.
    [49] Volschenk H, Viljoen M, Grobler J, et al (1997) Engineering pathways for malate degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 15: 253–257. doi: 10.1038/nbt0397-253
    [50] Banat I, Singh D, Nigam P, et al. (2000) Potential use of thermo-tolerant fermentative yeasts for industrial ethanol production. Res Adv Food Sci 1: 41–55.
    [51] Song X, Li Y, Wu Y, et al. (2018) Metabolic engineering strategies for improvement of ethanol production in cellulolytic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res, 18.
    [52] Dmytruk KV, Ruchala J, Grabek-Lejko D, et al. (2018) Autophagy-related gene ATG13 is involved in control of xylose alcoholic fermentation in the thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Res, 18.
    [53] Veselina Petrova (2017) Enerkem launches commercial production of ethanol from waste. Available from: https://renewablesnow.com/news/enerkem-launches-commercial-production-of-ethanol-from-waste-583674/.
    [54] India's First 2G ETHANOL Production Plant, News in Science, 2016. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GyAGDqWmjw.
    [55] Clariant's Cellulosic Ethanol Production Plant, Straubing, Bavaria, 2012. Available from: https://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/sud-chemie-ethanol/.
    [56] Nigam PS (2017) An overview: Recycling of solid barley waste generated as a by-production distillery and brewery. Waste Manage 62: 255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.018
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Energy
1.8 3.8

Metrics

Article views(4872) PDF downloads(828) Cited by(8)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog