Research article

Performance of the Brasiliano 92 orange cultivar with six trifoliate rootstocks

  • Received: 01 October 2020 Accepted: 21 December 2020 Published: 04 January 2021
  • The rootstock plays a crucial role in the fruit tree. For several decades, sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) has been the most widely used rootstock in citrus cultivation. However, the spread of the Tristeza virus (CTV) has prevented the use of sour orange rootstock in new plantings in many areas because it is sensitive to CTV. The objective of this experiment was to study the vegetative, productive, and fruit qualitative performance of six graft combinations obtained from grafting Brasiliano N.L. 92 onto Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. (PT); Flying dragon [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. cv. Monstrosa] (FD); Citrange Carrizo [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (CC); Citrange C35 [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, cv. Ruby's poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf., cv. Webber Fawcett] (C35); Citrange Troyer [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (CT); and Swingle Citrumelo [Citrus paradisi Macf. Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (SC). Sampled fruits were assessed for biometric measures, maturation index, and nutraceutical parameters. At 225 days after full bloom (DAFB), the oranges were harvested and the number and weight of fruit per tree were determined. The differences were recorded, and statistical analysis showed that each of the six combinations had specific characteristics. Particular attention must be given to the combination B92/FD; despite the fruit being smaller, it showed better organoleptic and nutraceutical results. For the lower yield per tree higher density of planting is required compared to the other rootstocks. The cost of planting a higher number of trees using the B92/FD graft combination at planting time can be justified for an orange cultivar that guarantees high income, such as the Brasiliano 92 cultivars.

    Citation: Gregorio Gullo, Antonio Dattola, Vincenzo Vonella, Rocco Zappia. Performance of the Brasiliano 92 orange cultivar with six trifoliate rootstocks[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 203-215. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021013

    Related Papers:

  • The rootstock plays a crucial role in the fruit tree. For several decades, sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) has been the most widely used rootstock in citrus cultivation. However, the spread of the Tristeza virus (CTV) has prevented the use of sour orange rootstock in new plantings in many areas because it is sensitive to CTV. The objective of this experiment was to study the vegetative, productive, and fruit qualitative performance of six graft combinations obtained from grafting Brasiliano N.L. 92 onto Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. (PT); Flying dragon [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. cv. Monstrosa] (FD); Citrange Carrizo [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (CC); Citrange C35 [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, cv. Ruby's poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf., cv. Webber Fawcett] (C35); Citrange Troyer [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (CT); and Swingle Citrumelo [Citrus paradisi Macf. Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] (SC). Sampled fruits were assessed for biometric measures, maturation index, and nutraceutical parameters. At 225 days after full bloom (DAFB), the oranges were harvested and the number and weight of fruit per tree were determined. The differences were recorded, and statistical analysis showed that each of the six combinations had specific characteristics. Particular attention must be given to the combination B92/FD; despite the fruit being smaller, it showed better organoleptic and nutraceutical results. For the lower yield per tree higher density of planting is required compared to the other rootstocks. The cost of planting a higher number of trees using the B92/FD graft combination at planting time can be justified for an orange cultivar that guarantees high income, such as the Brasiliano 92 cultivars.


    加载中


    [1] Zhang X, Breksa Ⅲ AP, Mishchuk DO, et al. (2011) Elevation, rootstock, and soil depth affect the nutritional quality of mandarin oranges. J Agric Food Chem 59: 2672–2679.
    [2] Cantuarias-Aviles T, Mourao Filho FAA, Stuchi ES, et al. (2010) Tree performance and fruit yield and quality of "Okitsu" Satsuma mandarin grafted on 12 rootstocks. Sci Hortic 123: 318–322.
    [3] Hussain S, Curk F, Anjum, MA, et al. (2013) Performance evaluation of common clementine on various citrus rootstocks. Sci Hortic 150: 278–282.
    [4] Simpson CR, Nelson SD, Melgar JC, et al. (2014) Growth response of grafted and ungrafted citrus trees to saline irrigation. Sci Hortic 169: 199–205.
    [5] Smith JP (2004) Investigations into the mechanisms underlying grapevine rootstock effects on scion vigour and yield. PhD Thesis, Charles Stuart University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia, 196.
    [6] Jones TH, Cullis, BR, Clingeleffer PR, et al. (2009) Effects of novel hybrid and traditional rootstocks on vigour and yield components of Shiraz grapevines. Aust J Grape Wine R 15: 284–292.
    [7] Shafieizargar A, Awang Y, Juraimi AS, et al. (2012) Yield and fruit quality of 'Queen' orange[Citrus sinensis (L) Osb.] grafted on different rootstocks in Iran. Aust J Crop Sci 6: 777–783.
    [8] Gómez-Muñoz N, Velázquez K, Vives MC, et al. (2017) The resistance of sour orange to Citrus tristeza virus is mediated by both the salicylic acid and RNA silencing defence pathways. Mol Plant Pathol 18: 1253–1266.
    [9] Moreno P, Ambrós S, Albiach-Martí MR, et al. (2008) Citrus tristeza virus: A pathogen that changed the course of the citrus industry. Mol Plant Pathol 9: 251–268.
    [10] Chen ZS, Wan LZ (1993) Rootstocks. In: Chen ZS, Wan LZ, The atlas of major citrus cultivar s in China. Science and Technology. Press of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 94–106.
    [11] Castle WS (1992) Rootstock and interstock effects on the growth of young Minneola Tangelo trees. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 105: 82–84.
    [12] Hutchison DJ (1974) Swingle Citrumelo—A promising rootstock hybrid. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Orlando, 89–91.
    [13] Roose ML (2014) Rootstock. Citrus Research and Extension Center, University of Florida 5, 95–105.
    [14] Barrett AS, Brown LR (2012) A novel method for estimating tree dimensions and calculating canopy using digital photography. Afr J Range For Sci 29: 153–156.
    [15] Scalzo J, Politi A, Mezzetti B, et al. (2005) Plant genotype affects TAC and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition 21: 207–213.
    [16] Pellegrini N, Re R, Yang M, et al. (1999) Screening of dietary carotenoids and carotenoid-rich fruit extracts for anti-oxidant activities applying 2, 2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylenebenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical cation decolourisation assay. Meth Enzymol 299: 379–389.
    [17] Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, et al. (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 1231–1237.
    [18] Scalzo J., Politi A, Pellegrini N., et al. (2005). Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition: 207–213.
    [19] Slinkard K, Singleton VL (1977) Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Amer J Enol Viticult 28: 49–55.
    [20] Cardenosa V, Barros L, Barreir JCM, et al. (2015) Different citrus rootstocks present high dissimilarities in their antioxidant activity and vitamins content according to the ripening stage. J Plant Pathol 174: 124–130.
    [21] Forner-Girner MA, Alcaide A, Primo-Millo E, et al. (2003) Performance of "Navelina" orange on 14 rootstocks in northern Valencia (Spain). Sci Hortic 98: 223–232.
    [22] Dubey AK, Sharma RM (2016) Effect of rootstocks on tree growth, yield, quality and leaf mineral composition of lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm.). Sci Hortic 200: 131–136.
    [23] Legua P, Forner JB, Hernandez F, et al. (2013) Physiochemical properties of orange juice from ten rootstocks using multivariate analysis. Sci Hortic 160: 268–273.
    [24] Legua P, Forner JB, Hernandez F, et al. (2014) Total phenolics, organic acids, sugars and antioxidant activity of mandarin (Citrus clementina Hort Ex Tan.): variation from rootstock. Sci Hortic 174: 60–64.
    [25] Zucconi F (1992) Controllo dello sviluppo nelle piante arboree: introduzione alla fisiologia della potatura. Rivista di Frutticoltura 12.
    [26] Fallahi E, Mousavi Z, Rodney DR (1991) Performance of 'Orlando' tangelo trees on ten rootstock in Arizona. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 116: 2–5.
    [27] Tazima ZH, Neves, CSVJ, Yada IFU, et al. (2013) Performance of 'Okitsu' mandarin on nine rootstocks. Sci Agric 27: 422–427.
    [28] Wheaton TA, Castle WS, Whitney JD, et al. (1991) Performance of citrus scion cultivars and rootstocks in a high-density planting. Hortscience 26: 837–840.
    [29] Bassal MA (2009) Growth, yield and fruit quality of 'Marisol' clementine grown on four rootstocks in Egypt. Sci Hortic 119: 132–137.
    [30] Espinoza-Nunez E, Mourão Filho FAA, Stuchi ES, et al. (2011) Performance of 'Tahiti' lime on twelve rootstocks under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Sci Hortic 129: 227–231.
    [31] Gonzatto MP, Kovaleski AP, Brugnara EC, et al. (2011) Performance of "Oneco" mandarin on six rootstocks in South Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 46: 406–411.
    [32] Ahmed W, Pervez MA, Amjad M, et al. (2006) Effect of stionic combination on the growth and yield of kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata blanco). Pak J Bot 38: 603–612.
    [33] Mouly PP, Gaydou EM, Lapierre L, et al. (1999) Differentiation of several geographical origins in single-strengh Valencia orange juices using quantitative comparison of carotenoid profiles. J Agric Food Chem 47: 4038–4045.
    [34] Lee HS, Castle WS (2001) Seasonal changes of carotenoid pigments and color in Hamlin, Earlygold, and Budd Blood orange juices. J Agric Food Chem 49: 877–882.
    [35] Dhuique-Mayer C, Caris-Veyrat C, Ollitrault P, et al. (2005) Varietal and interspecific influence on micronutrient contents in citrus from the mediterranean area. J Agric Food Chem 53: 2140–2145.
    [36] Goodner KL, Rouseff RL, Hofsommer HJ (2001) Orange, mandarin, and hybrid classification using multivariate statistics based on carotenoid profiles. J Agric Food Chem 49: 1146–1150.
    [37] Kato M, Ikoma Y, Matsumoto H, et al. (2004) Accumulation of carotenoids and expression of carotenoid biosynthetic genes during maturation in citrus fruit. Plant Physiol 134: 1–14.
    [38] Continella A, Pannitteri C, La Malfa S, et al. (2018) Influence of different rootstocks on yield precocity and fruit quality of "Tarocco Scirè" pigmented sweet orange. Sci Hortic 230: 62–67.
    [39] Kader AA (1999) Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hort 485: 203–208.
    [40] Castle SW (1995) Rootstock as a fruit quality factor in citrus and deciduous fruit crops. NZJ Crop Hortic Sci 23: 383–394.
    [41] Albrigo LG (1977) Rootstocks affect 'Valencia' orange fruit quality and water balance. Proc Int Soc Citricul 1: 62–65.
    [42] Syvertsen JP, Graham JH (1985) Hydraulic conductivity of roots, mineral nutrition, and leaf gas exchange of citrus rootstocks. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110: 865–869.
    [43] Vasconcellos LABC, Castle WS, (1994) Trunk xylem anatomy of mature healthy and blighted grapefruit trees on several rootstocks. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119: 185–194.
    [44] Nagy S (1980) Vitamin C contents of citrus fruit and their products: a review. J Agric Food Chem 28: 8–18.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2651) PDF downloads(193) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog