The ESG literature suggests that the relationship between a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and a firm's financial performance is positive, but the causal link between these two variables is ambiguous. The results in this study mirrored that sentiment of the ESG literature; thus, the purpose of this article is to frame the causal ambiguity in ESG research that accounts for ambiguous conclusions in ESG literature. This study found that firms with complete Bloomberg ESG ratings had higher abnormal returns than firms without complete ESG ratings, but the actual rating did not correlate with abnormal returns. Similarly, this study found that firms with higher ESG disclosure scores (regardless of whether the disclosures were good or bad) were associated with higher abnormal returns, which further illustrates the ambiguity and suggests transparency as a clarifying factor. While much of the literature notes challenges in ESG research, this study is one of the first that frames the confusing causal link between ESG performance and financial performance as the key conclusion of the study.
Citation: Zach Williams, Heather Apollonio. The causation dilemma in ESG research[J]. Green Finance, 2024, 6(2): 265-286. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024011
The ESG literature suggests that the relationship between a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and a firm's financial performance is positive, but the causal link between these two variables is ambiguous. The results in this study mirrored that sentiment of the ESG literature; thus, the purpose of this article is to frame the causal ambiguity in ESG research that accounts for ambiguous conclusions in ESG literature. This study found that firms with complete Bloomberg ESG ratings had higher abnormal returns than firms without complete ESG ratings, but the actual rating did not correlate with abnormal returns. Similarly, this study found that firms with higher ESG disclosure scores (regardless of whether the disclosures were good or bad) were associated with higher abnormal returns, which further illustrates the ambiguity and suggests transparency as a clarifying factor. While much of the literature notes challenges in ESG research, this study is one of the first that frames the confusing causal link between ESG performance and financial performance as the key conclusion of the study.
| [1] |
Ademi B, Klungseth N (2022) Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. J Glob Responsib 13: 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2022-0006 doi: 10.1108/JGR-01-2022-0006
|
| [2] |
Albuquerque R, Koskinen Y, Yang S, et al. (2020) Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. Rev Corp Financ Stud 9: 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011 doi: 10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011
|
| [3] |
Alkurdi A, Hamad A, Thneibat H, et al. (2021) Ownership structure's effect on financial performance: An empirical analysis of Jordanian listed firms. Cogent Bus Manag 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1939930 doi: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1939930
|
| [4] | Alves R, Krueger P, van Dijk M (2022) Drawing Up the Bill: Does Sustainable Investing Affect Stock Returns Around the World? Network for Studies on Pension, Aging and Retirement. https://www.netspar.nl//assets/uploads/P20220628_Netspar-Design-Paper-209_WEB.pdf. |
| [5] |
Atz U, Van Holt T Liu Z et al. (2022) Does Sustainability Generate Better Financial Performance? Review, Meta-analysis, and Propositions. J Sustain Financ Inv 13: 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934
|
| [6] |
Atz U, Van Holt T, Liu Z (2020) Do corporate sustainability and sustainable finance generate better financial performance? A review and meta-analysis. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3708495 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3708495
|
| [7] |
Aureli S, Gigli S, Medei R, et al. (2020) The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Evidence from Dow Jones Sustainability World Index listed companies. Corp Soc Resp Envir Ma 27: 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1772 doi: 10.1002/csr.1772
|
| [8] |
Bae K, El Ghoul S, Gong Z, et al. (2021) Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Corp Financ 67: 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876
|
| [9] | Berg F, Fabisik K, Sautner Z (2021) Is History Repeating Itself? The (Un)Predictable Past of ESG Ratings. Eur Corp Governanc Inst – Finance Working Paper 708/2020. |
| [10] | Berg F, Heeb F, Kölbel J (2022) The economic impact of ESG rating changes. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4088545 |
| [11] |
Berg F, Kölbel J, Rigobon R (2022) Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Rev Financ 26: 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 doi: 10.1093/rof/rfac033
|
| [12] | Berchicci L, King A (2021) Corporate Sustainability: A Model Uncertainty Analysis of Materiality. |
| [13] |
Bermejo Climent R, Garrigues I, Paraskevopoulos I, et al. (2021) ESG Disclosure and Portfolio Performance. Risks 9: 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/risks9100172 doi: 10.3390/risks9100172
|
| [14] |
Capelle-Blancard G, Petit A (2019) Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. J Bus Ethics 157: 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3 doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
|
| [15] |
Chen Z, Xie G (2022) ESG disclosure and Financial Performance: Moderating role of ESG Investors. Int Rev Financ Anal 83: 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291
|
| [16] |
Christensen D, Serafeim G, Sikochi A (2022) Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. Account Rev 97: 147–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506 doi: 10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
|
| [17] |
Engelhardt N, Ekkenga J, Posch P (2021) ESG Ratings and Stock Performance during the COVID-19 Crisis. Sustainability 13: 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137133 doi: 10.3390/su13137133
|
| [18] | Esterer F, Leuchtner D (2022) What Is Material? Determining Materiality of Sustainability Issues for Measures of Corporate Financial Performance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4026209 |
| [19] |
Fama E, French K (2007) Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices. J Financ Econ 83: 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.003
|
| [20] |
Galema R, Gerritsen D (2022) ESG rating score revisions and stock returns. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4218969 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4218969
|
| [21] | Gantchev N, Giannetti M, Li R (2023) Sustainability or Performance? Ratings and Fund Managers' Incentives. Swedish House of Finance Research Paper No. 21-4, European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 747/2021. |
| [22] |
Giannopulos G, Kihle Fagernes RV, Elmarzouky M, et al. (2022) The ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Norwegian Listed Firms. J Risk Financ Manage 15: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060237 doi: 10.3390/jrfm15060237
|
| [23] | Gibson R, Krueger P, Schmidt P (2021) ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns (Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 19–67, European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 651/2020. |
| [24] | Governance & Accountability Institute (2022) 2022 Sustainability Reporting In Focus: Examining 2021 Trends of Companies on the S&P 500 and Russell 1,000. Available from: https://www.ga-institute.com/research/ga-research-directory/sustainability-reporting-trends/2022-sustainability-reporting-in-focus.html. |
| [25] | GSIA (2020) Global Sustainable Investment Review. Available From: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf. |
| [26] |
Gregory R (2022) ESG scores and the response of the S&P 1500 to monetary and fiscal policy during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int Rev Econ Financ 78: 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.013
|
| [27] |
Guest P, Nerino M (2020) Do corporate governance ratings change investor expectations? Evidence from announcements by institutional shareholder services. Rev Financ 24: 891–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfz021 doi: 10.1093/rof/rfz021
|
| [28] | Hvidkjær S (2017) ESG Investing: A literature Review. Report Prepared for Dansif. https://dansif.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Litterature-review-UK-Sep-2017.pdf. |
| [29] | Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 15-073. |
| [30] |
Khan M (2019) Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns Around the World. Financ Anal J 75: 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299 doi: 10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
|
| [31] | King A, Pucker K (2022) ESG and alpha: Sales or substance? Institutional Investor. Available from: https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1wxqznltqnyzj/ESG-and-Alpha-Sales-or-Substance |
| [32] |
Kruger P, Sautner Z, Starks L (2020) The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev Financ Stud 33: 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhz137
|
| [33] |
Kwadjo Gyeke M, Kwame G (2024) The Impact of Dividend Policy on the Stock Return Volatility (A Study Of Financial Firms Listed On The S&P 500). Int J Dev Res 14: 64954–64961. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.27847.02.2024 doi: 10.37118/ijdr.27847.02.2024
|
| [34] | Lyu D (2024) Analyzing the Risk-Return Trade-Off Relationship of Chinese New Energy Firms Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Highlights Bus Econ Manage 30. https://drpress.org/ojs/index.php/HBEM/article/view/19941 |
| [35] |
Madison N, Schiehll E (2021) The effect of financial materiality on ESG Performance Assessment. Sustainability 13: 3652. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073652 doi: 10.3390/su13073652
|
| [36] |
Martini A (2021) Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the European Union. Environ Dev Sustain 23: 16874–16890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01375-3 doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01375-3
|
| [37] |
Meyer J, Schüpbach L, Utz S (2020) Capital-market effects of ESG scores: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683100 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3683100
|
| [38] |
Minutolo M, Kristjanpoller W, Stakeley J (2019) Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Bus Strat Environ 28: 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303 doi: 10.1002/bse.2303
|
| [39] | Moreale J, Zaynutdinova G (2018) A Bloomberg Terminal Application in an Intermediate Finance Course. J Financ Edu 44: 262–283. |
| [40] |
Nofsinger J, Sulaeman J, Varma A (2019) Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. J Corp Financ 58: 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.012
|
| [41] |
Pastor L, Stambaugh R, Taylor L (2022) Dissecting green returns. J Financ Econ 146: 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.007
|
| [42] |
Pastor L, Stambaugh R, Taylor L (2021) Sustainable investing in equilibrium. J Financ Econ 142: 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
|
| [43] |
Serafeim G, Yoon A (2022) Stock price reactions to ESG news: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Rev Account Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3 doi: 10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3
|
| [44] |
Serafeim G (2020) Public Sentiment and the Price of Corporate Sustainability. Financ Anal J 76: 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1723390 doi: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1723390
|
| [45] |
Shanaev S, Ghimire B (2021) When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns. Financ Res Lett 46: 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102302 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102302
|
| [46] |
Shohaieb D, Elmarzouky M, Albitar K (2022) Corporate governance and diversity management: Evidence from a disclosure perspective. Int J Account Inf Manage 30: 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0058 doi: 10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0058
|
| [47] | Starks L, Venkat P, Zhu Q (2017) Corporate ESG Profiles and Investor Horizons. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049943 |
| [48] |
van Duuren E, Plantinga A, Scholtens B (2016) ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. J Bus Ethics 138: 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8
|
| [49] | Whelan T, Atz U, Van Holt T, et al. (2021) ESG and Financial Performance. Center for Sustainable Business, NYU Stern. Available from: https://www.stern.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/ESG%20Paper%20Aug%202021.pdf. |
| [50] | Wilhelmsen E, Woods E (2021) ESG Ratings and StockPerformance (thesis). Available from: https://openaccess.nhh.no/nhh-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2767529/masterthesis.pdf?sequence = 1 |
| [51] |
Wood C, King A, Catlow R, et al. (2016) Terminal value: Building the alternative Bloomberg. Financ Soc 2: 138–150. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v2i2.1727 doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v2i2.1727
|
| [52] |
Wu S, Shao C, Chen J (2018) Approaches on the screening methods for materiality in Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability 10: 3233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093233 doi: 10.3390/su10093233
|
Zach Williams, Heather Apollonio. The causation dilemma in ESG research[J]. Green Finance, 2024, 6(2): 265-286. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024011
DownLoad: