Review Topical Sections

Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics

  • Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are members of an heterogenous group of bacteria which plays a significant role in a variety of fermentation processes. The general description of the bacteria included in the group is gram-positive, non-sporing, non-respiring cocci or rods. An overview of the genetics of lactococci, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactobacilli, pediococci, leuconostocs, enterococci and oenococciis presented with special reference to their metabolic traits. The three main pathways in which LAB are involved in the manufacture of fermented foods and the development of their flavour, are (a) glycolysis (fermentation of sugars), (b) lipolysis (degradation of fat) and (c) proteolysis (degradation of proteins). Although the major metabolic action is the production of lactic acid from the fermentation of carbohydrates, that is, the acidification of the food, LAB are involved in the production of many beneficial compounds such as organic acids, polyols, exopolysaccharides and antimicrobial compounds, and thus have a great number of applications in the food industry (i.e. starter cultures). With the advances in the genetics, molecular biology, physiology, and biochemistry and the reveal and publication of the complete genome sequence of a great number of LAB, new insights and applications for these bacteria have appeared and a variety of commercial starter, functional, bio-protective and probiotic cultures with desirable properties have marketed.

    Citation: Thomas Bintsis. Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 665-684. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665

    Related Papers:

    [1] Marzena Połaska, Barbara Sokołowska . Bacteriophages—a new hope or a huge problem in the food industry. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 324-346. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.324
    [2] Hisako Nakagawa, Tadaaki Miyazaki . Beneficial effects of antioxidative lactic acid bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 1-7. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.1
    [3] Yen Thi Ngoc Phan, Minh Thuy Tang, Tu Thi Minh Tran, Van Huu Nguyen, Trang Hien Nguyen, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino . Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in vegetable-based and meat-based fermented foods produced in the central region of Vietnam. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 61-70. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.61
    [4] Olena Livinska, Oksana Ivaschenko, Inna Garmasheva, Nadezhda Kovalenko . The screening of lactic acid bacteria with antioxidant properties. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 447-459. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.447
    [5] Phu-Tho Nguyen, Tho-Thi Nguyen, Duc-Cuong Bui, Phuoc-Toan Hong, Quoc-Khanh Hoang, Huu-Thanh Nguyen . Exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: the manipulation of environmental stresses for industrial applications. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 451-469. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020027
    [6] Sunisa Suwannaphan . Isolation, identification and potential probiotic characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Thai traditional fermented food. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(4): 431-446. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021026
    [7] Jordyn Bergsveinson, Emily Ewen, Vanessa Friesen, Barry Ziola . Transcriptional activity and role of plasmids of Lactobacillus brevis BSO 464 and Pediococcus claussenii ATCC BAA-344T during growth in the presence of hops. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 460-478. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.460
    [8] Jordyn Bergsveinson, Ilkka Kajala, Barry Ziola . Next-generation sequencing approaches for improvement of lactic acid bacteria-fermented plant-based beverages. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 8-24. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.8
    [9] Garmasheva I . Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Ukrainiantraditional dairy products. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 372-387. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.372
    [10] Smita H. Panda, Jyothsna Khanna Goli, Sushrirekha Das, NakulanandaMohanty . Production, optimization and probiotic characterization of potential lactic acid bacteria producing siderophores. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 88-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.88
  • Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are members of an heterogenous group of bacteria which plays a significant role in a variety of fermentation processes. The general description of the bacteria included in the group is gram-positive, non-sporing, non-respiring cocci or rods. An overview of the genetics of lactococci, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactobacilli, pediococci, leuconostocs, enterococci and oenococciis presented with special reference to their metabolic traits. The three main pathways in which LAB are involved in the manufacture of fermented foods and the development of their flavour, are (a) glycolysis (fermentation of sugars), (b) lipolysis (degradation of fat) and (c) proteolysis (degradation of proteins). Although the major metabolic action is the production of lactic acid from the fermentation of carbohydrates, that is, the acidification of the food, LAB are involved in the production of many beneficial compounds such as organic acids, polyols, exopolysaccharides and antimicrobial compounds, and thus have a great number of applications in the food industry (i.e. starter cultures). With the advances in the genetics, molecular biology, physiology, and biochemistry and the reveal and publication of the complete genome sequence of a great number of LAB, new insights and applications for these bacteria have appeared and a variety of commercial starter, functional, bio-protective and probiotic cultures with desirable properties have marketed.


    1. Introduction

    Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play a multifunctional role in food, agricultural, and clinical applications [1]. Using LAB in food fermentation is one of the ancient known food preserving techniques. Fermented milk products, such as yogurt and cheese, appeared in human diet about 8,000-10,000 years ago. Up to the 20th century, food fermentation remained an unregulated process, and, the discovery and characterization of LAB have changed the views on food fermentation.

    Properties such as nutritional, environmental, and adhesional adaptations have provided LAB with the ability to adapt and present in different environments ranging from food matrices such as dairy products, meats, vegetables, sourdough bread. In addition, LAB are common inhabitants of human mucosal surfaces such as oral cavity, vagina, and gastrointestinal tract [2]. Metabolic activities are associated with production of many beneficial compounds such as organic acids, polyols, exopolysaccharides and antimicrobial compounds [1,3].

    The traditional method for the manufacture of fermented food products was the “inoculation” of the food with a sample of a previous day product, i.e. back-slopping. This method has certain drawbacks, mainly a great fluctuation in the quality of the product, but is still used for some home-made products. The substitution of the back-slopping with a selected starter culture was very early realized to be a necessity. Nowadays, since the production of fermented foods is automated and produced in large quantities with total control of the process, the use of commercial starter cultures is an integral part of a successful production of any fermented product. Starters are divided into defined- and mixed-strain cultures. Defined-strain cultures are pure cultures with known physiological characteristics and technological properties. These consist of 2-6 strains, used in rotation as paired single strains or as multiple strains and enable industrial-scale production of high quality products. Mixed-strain cultures contain unknown numbers of strains of the same species and may also contain bacteria from different species or genera of LAB [4]. For a detailed classification of starter cultures see [4,5,6,7,8].

    An authoritative list of microorganisms with a documented use in food was established as a result of a joint project between the International Dairy Federation (IDF) and the European Food and Feed Cultures Association (EFFCA) and recommended for Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS list) [9]. The 2012 IDF-EFFCA inventory contains 195 bacterial species and 69 species of yeasts and moulds [10] and the updated list of 2017 reconfirmed their status for all LAB included in the list as well their qualifications [11].

    LAB are classified as Gram-positive bacteria which include low Guanine + Cytosine (G + C) content as well as being acid tolerant, non-motile, non-spore forming and are rod- or cocci-shaped. The main function of LAB is to produce lactic acid, that is, the acidification of the food. Thus, the main application of LAB is as starter cultures in the food industry with an enormous variety of fermented dairy products, meat, fish, fruit, vegetable and cereal products. Besides, LAB contribute to the flavour, texture and nutritional value of the fermented foods, through production of aroma components, and used as adjunct cultures [12,13]; production or degradation of exopolysaccharides, lipids and proteins, production of nutritional components such as vitamins, and used as functional cultures, and promoting therapeutic effects and used as probiotics [1,13,14]. In addition, they contribute to the inhibition of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms and thus, used as bio-protective cultures [15].


    2. Metabolism of LAB

    The three main pathways which are involved in the development of flavour in fermented food products are glycolysis (fermentation of sugars), lipolysis (degradation of fat) and proteolysis (degradation of proteins) [16,17,18]. Lactate is the main product generated from the metabolism of lactose and a fraction of the intermediate pyruvate can alternatively be converted to diacetyl, acetoin, acetaldehyde or acetic acid (some of which can be important for typical yogurt flavours). The contribution of LAB to lipolysis is relatively little, but proteolysis is the key biochemical pathway for the development of flavour in fermented foods [16,17,18,19]. Degradation of proteins by the activities of rennet enzymes and the cell-envelope proteinase and peptidases yields small peptides and free amino acids, the latter of which can be further converted to various alcohols, aldehydes, acids, esters and sulphur compounds for specific flavour development in dairy products [16,20].


    2.1. Glucose metabolism

    LAB need a sugar for energy production and subsequent growth. Fermentation of lactose is called glycolysis or glycolytic pathway (Figure 1). Obligatory homo-fermentative LAB are those that ferment lactose into pyruvic acid, which is then reduced to lactic acid by the reducing power previously produced in the form of NADH. Thus, lactic acid is obtained as the sole product (Glucose gives 2 Lactic Acid and 2 ATP moles) and this process is called homo-lactic fermentation [18]. Obligatory homo-fermentative LAB include, among others, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus amylophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus helveticus [18]. Homo-lactic fermentation should theoretically yield 2 moles of lactic acid per mole of consumed glucose with a theoretical yield of 1 g of product per g of substrate, but the experimental yields are usually lower (0.74-0.99 g/g) because a portion of the carbon source is used for biomass production (0.07-0.22 g/g) [18,19]. Under stress conditions such as carbon source limitation, presence of different carbon sources other than glucose, high pH or low temperature, some homo-fermentative microorganisms can produce formic acid by mixed acid fermentation [20] by the action of pyruvate-formate lyase [21].

    Hetero-lactic fermentation is the process that is characterized by the formation of co-products such as CO2, ethanol and/or acetic acid in addition to lactic acid as the end product of fermentation—phosphoketolase pathway (Figure 1). The first step of glucose degradation, which is called pentose phosphate pathway, leads to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, acetyl-phosphate and CO2. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate enters the glycolysis through which it is transformed into lactic acid, while acetyl-phosphate is converted into acetic acid and/or ethanol (Glucose gives Lactic acid and CO2 and Ethanol and ATP or Glucose gives Lactic acid and CO2 and Acetic acid and 2 ATP and 2 NADH). The relationship between the amounts of acetic acid and ethanol, which reduces the theoretical yield to 0.5 g/g, depends on the ability of the microorganism to reoxidize the NADH generated in the early stages of the process along with its energy requirements. Microorganisms that use only this metabolic pathway for the consumption of carbohydrates are called obligatory hetero-fermentative, among which are Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus reuteri [18].

    Figure 1. Lactose metabolism pathways in lactic acid bacteria. After: [4,16,17,18].

    In addition to glucose, there are other hexoses such as fructose, mannose or galactose, which can be consumed by LAB [18]. On the other hand, hexose-fermenting lactobacilli are unable to ferment pentoses. There are some species of this genus, classified as facultative hetero-fermentative, among which Lactobacillus alimentarius, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus xylosus [18], that perform both fermentations, consuming hexoses by the homo-lactic pathway and pentoses by the hetero-lactic one. The catabolism of pentoses requires additional conversion steps through which they are transformed into metabolic intermediates of the pentose phosphate pathway. By this way, as an instance, xylose is transformed into xylulose and then phosphorylated to xylulose 5-phosphate, arabinose into ribulose, and this in turn is phosphorylated to ribulose 5-phosphate [21].

    LAB can also metabolize disaccharides such as lactose, maltose and sucrose, which are cleaved by the action of endocellular hydrolases. Lactose fermentation by LAB has been reviewed by [15,16,21,22]. After transporting into the cell, lactose is fermented with one of the four pathways as shown in Figure 1. For example, in lactococci the tagatose pathway is followed and lactose transport and the enzymes for the pathway are plasmid encoded [23]. Galactose is only metabolized by Lb. helveticus and some strains of Lb. delbruecki subsp. lactis (Gal+) and probably leuconstoc via Leloir pathway. Glucose-6-P is metabolized by the glucolytic pathway in the lactobacilli and by phosphoketolase pathway in leuconstoc. L-lactate is generally the sole product of fermentation, but when LAB are grown on galactose, maltose or low levels of glucose other product are formed, form pyruvate metabolism (Figure 2).

    Figure 2. Pyruvate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. After: [4,16,17,18].

    Citrate and malate are the most abundant organic acids in plants. Citrate metabolism is important in fermented dairy products, while malate metabolism is important in wine. The organisms responsible for citrate metabolism in starter cultures are leuconostoc and Cit+ lactococci. Citrate is hydrolyzed to oxaloacetate and acetate by citrate lyase. Citrate lyase is inducible in leuconostocs and constitutive in Cit+ lactococci [24]. The oxaloacetate is decarboxylated to pyruvate, which can undergo several further transformations to diacetyl, acetoin, and 2,3-butylene glycol. Citrate is metabolized by Leuconostoc spp. and some strains of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis (citrate-utilizing, Cit+) to CO2 which is responsible for “eye” formation in some cheeses [16]. In addition, other important aroma compounds are produced in fermented milks, cheese and butter (Figure 3). Cit+ strains of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis contain a plasmid which encodes the transport of citrate. Citrate metabolism has been reviewed by Hugenholtz [25]. The presence of a citrate permease is essential for the metabolism of citrate. The citrate permeases of both Lc. lactis subsp. lactis and Leuconostoc spp. were found to be pH dependant and their highest acidity was between pH 5.0 and 6.0. The citrate inside the cell is converted to oxaloacetate, by the enzyme citrate lyase, and then oxaloacetate is decarboxylated to pyruvate. In lactococci, pyruvate is then converted to acetate, diacetyl, acetoin, 2,3-butanediol and CO2. The enzyme pyruvate formate lyase is able to convert pyruvate to formate, acetate, acetaldehyde and ethanol under anaerobic conditions and at high pH (>7.0). Under aerobic conditions and at pH 5.5 to 6.5, pyruvate can be converted to acetate, acetaldehyde, ethanol and the minor products acetoin, diacetyl and 2,3-butanediol via the multi-enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (Figure 3). In Leuconostoc spp., the pyruvate produced from citrate is converted to lactate, although at low pH and in the absence of glucose (or lactose) Leuconostoc spp. will produce diacetyl and acetoin. Acetate is also formed via the hetero-fermentative metabolism of lactose during co-metabolism with citrate [22].

    Figure 3. Citrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. After: [4,16,17,18].

    Malic acid is fermentable by LAB. Both homo-lactics and hetero-lactics are able to decarboxylate malic acid to lactic acid and CO2. Minimal CO2 production has been considered beneficial in maintaining anaerobiosis in sauerkraut. In cucumber fermentation, CO2 production causes bloater damage. The decarboxylation of malic acid is undesirable in cucumber fermentation. Lb. plantarum produces most of the CO2 during cucumber juice fermentation via the decarboxylation of malic acid [26]. Strains of Lb. plantarum that do not decarboxylate malic acid (MDC-) might improve cucumber fermentation. Some MDC-mutants have been obtained through N-methyl-NV-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis of MDC+ parent strains. These mutants did not produce significant amounts of CO2 when they fermented cucumber juice containing native malate [27].


    2.2. Starch metabolism

    Although hydrolyzing starch to simple sugars is not important in traditional fermented vegetables, a few amylolytic LAB have been isolated from starchy raw materials. An investigation of Mexican pozol, a fermented maize dough, indicates that LAB accounted for 90-97% of the total active microflora [28]. During fermentation, the amylolytic LAB degrade the starch first, and then the resulting sugars allow a secondary flora to develop. An acidophilic starch hydrolyzing enzyme secreted from a strain of Lb. plantarum was isolated and partially purified. This enzyme has a molecular mass of approximately 230 kDa and is capable of hydrolyzing soluble starch, amylopectin, glycogen, and pullan. The major reaction products from soluble starch were maltotriose, maltotetraose, and maltopentaose. These reaction products suggest that this enzyme may hydrolyze both α-1,6- and α-1,4-glucosidic linkages [28].


    2.3. Protein metabolism

    LAB are fastidious microorganisms and are unable to synthesize many amino acids, vitamins and nucleic acid bases [14,18,21]. Depending on the species and the strain, LAB require from 6 to 14 different amino acids [27,29]. Since free amino acids in milk are limited and amino acids are present as protein components, the growth of LAB requires the hydrolysis of milk proteins. The hydrolysis of peptides to free amino acids and the subsequent utilization of these amino acids is a central metabolic activity in LAB [14,18], and proteolysis has been identified as the key process influencing the rate of flavour and texture development in most cheese varieties and has been reviewed [16,17,20] and the catabolism of amino acids has been reviewed by Kunji et al. [30]. The degradation of milk proteins to peptides is catalysed by proteolytic enzymes present in LAB [31,32], and peptides are then further hydrolysed by exopeptidases and endopeptidases to small peptides and amino acids [32].

    LAB have only weak proteolytic action on myofibrillar proteins in fermented meat products [19,28]. However, some Lb. casei, Lb. plantarum, Lb. curvatus and Lb. sakei strains actively contribute to the hydrolysis of the sarcoplasmic proteins [33] and to the subsequent decomposition of peptides into amino acids. Several peptidase activities have been reported in Lb. sakei, Lb. curvatus and Lb. plantarum isolated from sausages [19]. Further, some Lb. sakei, Lb. curvatus and Lb. plantarum strains possess leucine and valine amino-peptidases, which contribute to the catabolism of proteins and peptides generating free amino acids, precursors of flavour compounds in the final product [34].


    2.4. Lipid metabolism

    The enzymatic metabolism of fat is limited during the manufacture of fermented food products. The degradation of milk fat releases free fatty acids and glycerol, monoacylglycerides or diacylglycerides. However, certain free fatty acids are essential flavour compounds in certain cheeses (e.g. caprine milk cheeses). In addition, they react with alcohols or free sulphydryl groups to form esters and thioesters, respectively, or act as precursors of a number of other favour compounds, such as lactones [34]. Esterase activity has been detected in various lactobacilli [35], and esters contribute to the characteristic flavour of Swiss-type [33,34] and White-brined cheese [36].


    3. Genetics

    LAB used for starter cultures in fermented food products belong to a number of bacterial genera including Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Leuconostoc, all members of the Firmicutes. Moreover, some probiotic cultures are mostly members of the genus Bifidobacterium, which also produce lactic acid as one of their major fermentation end-products, however, from the taxonomical point of view, they are members of the Actinobacteria. In addition, Enterococcus spp. have been found to be part of many fermented food microbiota, but, since they may cause a number of infections and may acquire antibiotic resistance mechanisms, are not commonly used as starter cultures [37].

    The genetics of the LAB used as starter cultures in the food industry have been reviewed [38,39,40,41] and an overview is presented below. In addition, complete genome sequences of a great number of LAB have been published [42].


    3.1. Lactococcus spp.

    Lactococci are mesophilic LAB that were first isolated from green plants [39]. These bacteria, previously designated as the lactic streptococci (Streptococcus lactis subsp. lactis or S. lactis subsp. cremoris) was placed in this new taxon in 1987 by Schleifer [39]. Lactococci are selected for use as starters based on their metabolic stability, their resistance to bacteriophage, and their ability to produce unique compounds—often from amino acid catabolism. Lc. lactis subsp. lactis form one of the main constituents in starter cultures where their most important role lies in their ability to produce acid in milk and to convert milk fat and protein into flavour compounds.

    Eighty five Lc. lactis genomes have been completed up to now according to the data retrieved from [43]. Genome ranges in size from 2.3 to 2.7 Mb. The availability of these complete lists of genes allows drawing full metabolic pathways [44] and exploiting some interesting characteristics for the production of fermented foods. There are noticeable differences between strains, e.g. the chromosome of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis MG1363 is 160 kb larger than that of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 and has an average G + C content of 35.8%, and thus, encodes more proteins [4].

    Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris strains are preferred over Lc. lactis subsp. lactis strains because of their superior contribution to product flavor via unique metabolic mechanisms [45]. With the knowledge of the complete genome sequences, Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris was found to contain greater genome sizes than Lc. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 (approximately 2.37 Mb), with Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 containing the largest genome size of approximately 2.53 Mb, followed by Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 with a genome size of 2.44 Mb [42]. Interestingly, a complete set of competence genes was observed on the Lc. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 genome, indicating that the strain may have the ability to undergo natural DNA transformation [41].

    Many of the traits in lactococci which render these microorganisms suitable for dairy fermentations are in fact encoded on plasmids [43]. Traits such as lactose utilization, casein breakdown, bacteriophage resistance, bacteriocin production, antibiotic resistance, resistance to and transport of metal ions, and exopolysaccharide (EPS) production have all been associated with extra-chromosomal plasmid DNA. Plasmids isolated from lactococci range in size from 3 to 130 kb, have a G + C content of 30-40% and vary in function and distribution, with most strains carrying between 4 and 7 per cell [44]. Plasmids are commonly exchanged between strains via conjugation [43,44,45,46] and with the chromosome by insertion sequence (IS) elements [47]. Presumably, these exchanges and rearrangements mediate rapid strain adaptation and evolution but also add to the instability of important metabolic functions [48,49].


    3.2. Streptococcus thermoplilus

    Streptococcus thermoplilus is the second most commercially important starter culture. S. thermophilus is used, along with Lactobacillus spp., as a starter culture for the manufacture of several important fermented dairy foods, including fermented milks, yogurt, Feta and Mozzarella cheeses [4]. Although research on the physiology of S. thermophilus has revealed important information on some of these properties, including sugar and protein metabolism, polysaccharide production, and flavor generation, and only recently has the genetic basis for many of these traits been determined.

    According to the data retrieved from NCBI, 32 S. thermophilus genomes have been completed [42]. The genome of S. thermophilus is 1.8 Mb, making it among the smallest genomes of all LAB. Although a moderate thermophile, it is phylogenetically related to the more mesophilic lactococci and has a comparable low G + C ratio between 36.8 and 39%. Moreover, S. thermophilus is related to human pathogenic strains of streptococci such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae [50]. However, the most important pathogenic determinants are either absent or present as pseudogenes, unless they encode basic cellular functions [50]. S. thermophilus has therefore diverged from its pathogenic relatives to occupy the well-defined ecological niche of milk [50]. Pastink et al. [51] compared, using a genome-scale metabolic model of S. thermophilus LMG18311 with those of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis and reported the minimal amino acid auxotrophy (only histidine and methionine or cysteine) of S. thermophilus and the broad range of volatiles produced by the strain compared to lactococci. The unique pathway for acetaldehyde production, which is responsible for yogurt flavour, was also identified in S. thermophilus.

    Unlike Lactococcus spp., plasmids are thought to play a relatively insignificant role in S. thermophilus, reported to be found in about 20-59% of strains examined [52,53,54]. Streptococcal plasmids are generally small, ranging in size from 2.1 to 10 kb and encode few industrially useful phenotypic traits, which include low molecular weight, heat stress proteins and specificity subunits of bacteriophage-resistant restriction modification systems [55,56,57].


    3.3. Lactobacillus spp.

    The genus Lactobacillus encompasses a large number of different species that display a relatively large degree of diversity. Actually, it is the largest genus in the LAB group, with over fifty species in total. Similar to S. thermophilus, the lactobacilli also belong to the thermophilic group of LAB starter cultures.

    The species Lactobacillus delbrueckii contain three subspecies, that is subsp. delbrueckii, subsp. lactis and subsp. bulgaricus. The 48 genome assemblies of Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus has a median total length of 1.87624 Mb and a median protein count 1,641 and a median G + C% of 49.8 [42].

    Lb. plantarum has one of the largest genomes known among LAB [58,59]. The 294 genome assemblies of Lb. plantarum has a median total length of 3.2616 Mb and a median protein count 2,991 and a median G + C% of 44.4687 [42]. In addition, 224 complete sequences of plasmids have reported [42]. Lb. plantarum is the predominant microorganism in sourdough and many cereal-based fermented products, and is dominant due to its utilization of corn dextrins after the depletion of the fermentable sugars [1] and recently the antimicrobial and antifungal properties have investigated [60].

    Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis is the predominant LAB in sourdough [1] and 14 genome assemblies of Lb. sanfranciscensis have been reported, which have a median total length of 1.28747 Mb and a median protein count 1,221 and a median G + C% of 34.7 [42].

    Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei is frequently recovered from matured cheese and constitute, together with Lb. plantarum, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lb. rhamnosus and Lactobacillus casei the core microbiota of the non-starter LAB contributing to the maturation process [12,13]. The 78 genome assemblies of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei have been published. It has a median total length of 2.99174 Mb and a median protein count 2,899 and a median G + C% of 46.3 [42]. There are 36 plasmid annotation reports.

    Lb. rhamnosus is one of the few species of Lactobacillus that have been used as probiotic organisms in functional foods. A strain of Lb. rhamnosus, designated HN001, has been identified that has both flavour enhancing and probiotic attributes, therefore, it can be used as an adjunct during cheese manufacture to reduce adventitious microflora, accelerate cheese ripening, and improve cheese flavor [31,32].

    Lb. johnsonii strains have been mainly isolated from the feces of humans and animals [61,62], suggesting that these bacteria constitute part of the natural intestinal flora. The 10 complete genome sequences are available [42] and they have a median total length of 1.88 Mb and G + C 34.55%. Lb. johnsonii La1 (formerly Lactobacillus acidophilus La1) has been extensively studied for its probiotic properties and is commercialized in the LC1 fermented milk products [40]. La1 shows immunomodulatory properties [63,64] and antimicrobial properties [65,66,67]. The 34 genome assemblies of Lb. acidophilus (used as probiotic) have been published. It has a median total length of 1.97643 Mb and a median protein count 1,866 and a median G + C% of 34.6 [42].

    Lactobacillus helveticus is quite closely related (< 10% sequence divergence) to Lb. amylovorus, Lb. acidophilus, Lb. delrueckii, Lb. acetotolerans, Lb. gasseri, and Lb. amylophilus [68]. The 49 genome assemblies of Lb. helveticus has a median total length of 2.05581 Mb and a median protein count 1,720 and a median G + C% of 36.7 [42]. Approximately 40 chromosomal genes and four plasmids have been sequenced from Lb. helveticus. Lb. helveticus is a component of “thermophilic” starter cultures used in the manufacture of a number of fermented dairy products [4,68] and grows on a relatively restricted number of carbohydrates that includes lactose and galactose and typically requires riboflavin, pantothenic acid and pyridoxal for growth [69,70].

    Lactobacillus reuteri is a member of the normal microbial community of the gut in humans and animals. This organism produces antibiotic compounds, such as reutericin and reuterin, which have inhibitory effects on pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, Lb. reuteri is commonly used as a probiotic to maintain the balance of the gut microbial flora and stimulate the intestinal immune system. The 117 genome assemblies of Lb. reuteri has a median total length of 2.16482 Mb and a median protein count 1,968 and a median G + C% of 38.6 [42].

    Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei took its name from rice alcoholic beverage (i.e. sake), which was the product that it was first isolated. The 39 genome assemblies of Lb. sakei subsp. sakei has a median total length of 1.99426 Mb and a median protein count 1,893 and a median G + C% of 41.0381 [42].

    Lb. fermentum can be found in many vegetable and cereal-based fermented foods and it has been extensively used as a probiotic. The 20 complete genome sequences have reported having median length of 1.99 Mb and G + C 51.85%. Recently, a probiotic from famous longevity villages in Korea from healthy adults who were aged above 80 years and had regular bowel movements were isolated [71]. The isolates showed strong binding to intestinal epithelial cells, high immune-enhancing activity, anti-inflammation activity, and anti-oxidation activity as well as high survival rates in the presence of artificial gastric juice and bile solution, that is all the characteristics for a promising probiotic culture.


    3.4. Pediococcus spp.

    Phylogenetically, Pediococcus and Lactobacillus are related and form a super-cluster; all species of Pediococcus fall within the Lactobacillus caseiPediococcus sub-cluster. However, morphologically, they are distinct since they form tetrads via cell division in two perpendicular directions in a single plane. Pediococcus can be described as the only acidophilic, homo-fermentative, LAB that divide alternatively in two perpendicular directions to form tetrads [72]. Pediococcus pentosaceus can be isolated from a variety of plant materials and bacterial-ripened cheeses and is a typical component of the NSLAB of many cheese varieties during ripening [73] and has been suggested as an acid producing starter culture in the dairy fermentations [74,75]. Strains of P. pentosaceus have been reported to contain between three and five resident plasmids [76]. Plasmid-linked traits include the ability to ferment raffinose, melibiose, and sucrose, as well as, the production of bacteriocins [77,78]. Plasmids can be conjugally transferred between Pediococcus and Enterococcus, Streptococcus, or Lactococcus and electro-transformation has been utilized to introduce plasmids into pediococci, including P. pentosaceus [41]. Pediococcus damnosus (previously identified as Pediococcus cerevisiae), which is a homo-fermentative LAB species, together with Lb. brevis, are commonly found in limbic and gueuze beer [79]. These LAB are dominating the microfloras of beer production from 2 up to 10 months of fermentation/maturation process. They are, like some other LAB species, well adapted to the specific environment in beer, due to a plasmid-encoded transporter protein HorA and a multi-drug transporter ORF5, which transport the hop antimicrobial compounds out of the cytoplasm [79,80,81,82]. Transcriptome analysis of a beer-spoiling Lb. brevis strain has indeed shown that plasmid transcription is important for growth in both gassed and degassed beers [83].


    3.5. Leuconostoc spp.

    Leuconostoc mesenteroides is a facultative anaerobe requiring complex growth factors and amino acids [84]. Most strains in liquid culture appear as cocci, occurring singly or in pairs and short chains; however, morphology can vary with growth conditions; cells grown in glucose or on solid media may have an elongated or rod-shaped morphology. Cells are Gram-positive, asporogenous and non-motile. The 16 complete genome sequences are available [42], having a median length of 1.9 Mb and G + C 37.75%. Although Leuc. mesenteroides is commonly found on fruits and vegetables, it has been extensively used as an industrial dairy starter culture [4]. Under micro-aerophilic conditions, has an hetero-fermentative reaction. Glucose and other hexose sugars are converted to equimolar amount of D-lactate, ethanol and CO2 via a combination of the hexose monophosphate and pentose phosphate pathways [85]. Other metabolic pathways include conversion of citrate to diacetyl and acetoin and production of dextrans and levan from sucrose [85].


    3.6. Enterococcus spp.

    Enterococci consists of organisms typically found in the intestines of mammals, although through fecal contamination they can appear in sewage, soil, and water. They cause a number of infections that are becoming increasingly a problem due to the number of antibiotic resistance mechanisms these organisms have picked up. Both E. faecalis and E. faecium cause similar diseases in humans, and are mainly distinguished by their metabolic capabilities. E. faecium is an opportunistic pathogen which causes a range of infections similar to those observed with E. faecalis, including urinary tract infections, bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), and infective endocarditis (inflammation of the membrane surrounding the heart) [86,87,88].

    Enterococci possess a broad spectrum of antibiotic resistances and examples of such are vancomycin resistance in E. gallinarum, resistance towards streptogramins in E. faecalis, resistance to isoxazolylpenicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, aminoglycosides, lincosamides and polymyxins [86,87,88].


    3.7. Oenococcus spp.

    Oenococcus oeni is another member of the LAB and it occurs naturally in marshes and similar environments. It carries out malolactic conversion during secondary fermentation in wine production which is the conversion of malic acid to lactic acid with a concomitant rise in pH, making the wine microbiologically stable and enhancing the sensory properties of the wine (aroma, flavor, and texture). This step occurs after the yeast has converted the sugars in the wine to ethanol and carbon dioxide. The organism's high tolerance to sulfite and ethanol mean that it will be the predominant organism in the wine at the end of fermentation where it cleans up the remaining sugars and converts the bitter-tasting malic acid [89]. O. oeni differentially encode several carbohydrate utilization and amino acid biosynthesis pathways which have resulted in adaptation to their individual ecological niches [89]. The 203 complete genome sequences have reported having median length of 1.91033 Mb and G + C 37.9% [42].


    4. Genetic engineering

    Over the last 15-20 years a number of attempts have been made to change metabolite production in LAB, via genetic engineering. Mainly, these attempts are focused on the production of other flavour compounds from lactic acid, usually by removing lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), the enzyme directly responsible for reduction of pyruvate to lactate [90,91]. The relative simplicity of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis sugar metabolism via the pyruvate pathway (Figure 2) together with the availability of the complete genome sequence [4] makes this bacterium a great model for the study of LAB. The metabolic re-routing of sugar metabolism has been reviewed [92,93]. Initial metabolic engineering of Lc. lactis has focused primarily on the re-routing of pyruvate metabolism. Sugar metabolism was diverted towards the production of α-acetolactate, the precursor of diacetyl, by either disruption of lactate dehydrogenase or by the nisin inducible expression system (NICE), through the overproduction of NADH oxidase. By combining the latter strategy with disruption of the gene encoding α-acetolactate decarboxylase, high diacetyl production from glucose and lactose was achieved. The production of this bacteriocin is strongly regulated through auto induction. In the absence of nisin, the nisin-biosynthetic genes are not expressed, and the degree of expression is directly proportional to the amount of inducer (nisin) added [94]. Using this system an efficient alanine-producer was constructed by introducing the gene coding for alanine dehydrogenase in the NICE system [94].

    The development of new starter cultures for the production of fermented foods, that could meet the changing consumer preferences and expectations for safe products with specific characteristics, is studied through (a) the composition of mixed-strain cultures isolated from nature or (b) the genetic engineering of existing isolates. A variety of techniques involving natural selection and evolution are available to enhance the performance of existing strains, including the isolation of mutants with desired properties, adaptive laboratory evolution, genome shuffling, and genome editing [95,96]. However, for food applications, recombinant DNA technology is strongly limited by regulations [95,97,98] and the negative consumer perspective towards GMOs [95]. Hence, this field mainly relies on classical untargeted and laborious methods based on natural selection and evolution, such as mutagenesis and adaptive laboratory evolution [96,98,99] which are considered non-GMO, while other non-targeted methods resulting in non-GMO strains are transduction and conjugation [100].

    As already mentioned, LAB are so multifunctional and fulfill many important functions in foods, such as the improvement of overall quality of the food and contribution to the development of specific flavor, as well as the improvement of the safety by inhibiting spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, and a number of research papers have been focused on the use of autochthonous starter cultures. That is, the use of multiple strain cultures which would be representative of the microbial composition of the food and would ensure high performance during the manufacture of fermented foods. Thus, the use of autochthonous starter cultures has been studied for a variety of fermented foods such as Mozzarella cheese [101], white pickled cheese [102], spreadable goat's cheese [103], Sucuk, a Turkish dry-fermented sausage [104] and Chorizo [105,106].


    5. Conclusions

    LAB are the most commonly used microorganisms for the fermentation and preservation of foods. Their importance is associated mainly with their safe metabolic activity while growing in foods utilising available carbohydrates for the production of organic acids and other metabolites. Their common occurrence in foods, alongwith their long-lived uses, contributes to their natural acceptance as GRAS (Generally Recognised As Safe) for human consumption [107]. The EFSA's “Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)” has concluded that the fermenting bacteria associated with food, whether resistant to antibiotics or not with the possible exception of enterococci do not pose a clinical problem [107]. However, they can act as a reservoir for transferable resistance genes. Strains with genes transferable in such a way could inter the food chain and increase the probability of a transfer to food associated intestinal pathogenic organisms.

    The development of fermenting bacterial cultures was huge during the last 15 years, since the discovery of the complete genome sequence of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 by Bolotin et al. in 2001 [4] and a variety of commercial starter, functional, bio-protective and probiotic cultures with desirable properties have marketed. Advances in the genetics, molecular biology, physiology, and biochemistry of LAB have provided new insights and applications for these bacteria. Food industry is now capable of producing safe and nutritious products with different flavours, sometimes with special health-promoting properties, which satisfy the demands of all consumer and market niches, and to resemble the characteristics of the traditional products. In addition, the use of selected strains of given species with known metabolic properties and high technological performances has improved the total quality control of the manufacturing process.


    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.


    [1] Bintsis T (2018) Lactic acid bacteria: their applications in foods. J Bacteriol Mycol 5: 1065.
    [2] Hayek SA, Ibrahim SA (2013) Current limitations and challenges with lactic acid bacteria: a review. Food Nutr Sci 4: 73–87.
    [3] Khalid K (2011) An overview of lactic acid bacteria. Int J Biosci 1: 1–13.
    [4] Bintsis T, Athanasoulas A (2015) Dairy starter cultures, In: Papademas P, Editor, Dairy Microbiology, A Practical Approach, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 114–154.
    [5] Von Wright A, Axelsson L (2011) Lactic acid bacteria: An introduction, In: Lahtinne S, Salminen S, Von Wright A, et al., Editors, Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects, London: CRC Press, 1–17.
    [6] Sheehan JJ (2007) What are starters and what starter types are used for cheesemaking? In: McSweeney PLH, Editor, Cheese problems solved, Boca Raton: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 36–37.
    [7] Tamime AY (2002) Microbiology of starter cultures, In: Robinson RK, Editor, Dairy Microbiology Handbook, 3 Eds., New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 261–366.
    [8] Parente E, Cogan TM (2004) Starter cultures: General aspects, In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, et al., Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, 4 Eds., London: Elsevier Academic Press, 23–147.
    [9] Bourdichon F, Boyaval P, Casaregola J, et al. (2012) The 2012 Inventory of Microbial Species with technological beneficial role in fermented food products. B Int Dairy Fed 455: 22–61.
    [10] Bourdichon F, Berger B, Casaregola S, et al. (2012) A safety assessment of microbial food cultures with history of use in fermented dairy products. B Int Dairy Fed 455: 2–12.
    [11] Ricci A, Allende A, Bolton D, et al. (2017) Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA. EFSA J 15: 4664.
    [12] Beresford T, Cogan T (1997) Improving Cheddar cheese flavor, In: Proceedings of the 5th Cheese Symposium, Cork: Teagasc/University College Cork, 53–61.
    [13] Picon A (2018) Cheese Microbial Ecology and Safety, In: Papademas P, Bintsis T, Editors, Global Cheesemaking Technology, Cheese Quality and Characteristics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 71–99.
    [14] Wedajo B (2015) Lactic acid bacteria: benefits, selection criteria and probiotic potential in fermented food. J Prob Health 3: 129.
    [15] Grattepanche F, Miescher-Schwenninger S, Meile L, et al. (2008) Recent developments in cheese cultures with protective and probiotic functionalities. Dairy Sci Technol 88: 421–444. doi: 10.1051/dst:2008013
    [16] Law BA (1999) Cheese ripening and cheese flavour technology, In: Law BA, Editor, Technology of Cheesemaking, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press Ltd., 163–192.
    [17] Smit G, Smit BA, Engels WJ (2005) Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 591–610. doi: 10.1016/j.fmrre.2005.04.002
    [18] Tamime AY, Robinson RK (1999) Yoghurt Science and Technology, 2 Eds., Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
    [19] Ammor MS, Mayo B (2006) Selection criteria for lactic acid bacteria to be used as functional starter cultures in dry sausage production: An update. Meat Sci 76: 138–146.
    [20] Souza MJ, Ardo Y, McSweeney PLH (2001) Advances in the study of proteolysis in cheese. Int Dairy J 11: 327–345.
    [21] Martinez FAC, Balciunas EM, Salgado JM, et al. (2013) Lactic acid properties, applications and production: A review. Trends Food Sci Tech 30: 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.11.007
    [22] Burgos-Rubio CN, Okos MR, Wankat PC (2000) Kinetic study of the conversion of different substrates to lactic acid using Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Biotechnol Progr 16: 305–314. doi: 10.1021/bp000022p
    [23] Hofvendahl K, Hahn-Hägerda B (2000) Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb Tech 26: 87–107. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00155-6
    [24] Crow VL, Davey GP, Pearce LE, et al. (1983) Plasmid linkage of the D-tagatose 6-phosphate pathway in Streptococcus lactis: Effect on lactose and galactose metabolism. J Bacteriol 153: 76–83.
    [25] Hugenholtz J (1993) Citrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12: 165–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00017.x
    [26] McFeeters RF, Fleming HP, Thompson RL (1982) Malic acid as a source of carbon dioxide in cucumber fermentations. J Food Sci 47: 1862–1865. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb12900.x
    [27] Daeschel MA, McFeeters RF, Fleming HP, et al. (1984) Mutation and selection of Lactobacillus plantarum strains that do not produce carbon dioxide from malate. Appl Environ Microb 47: 419–420.
    [28] Li KY (2004) Fermentation: Principles and Microorganisms, In: Hui YH, Meunier-Goddik L, Hansen LM, et al., Editors, Handbook of Food and Beverage Fermentation Technology, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 594–608.
    [29] Chopin A (1993) Organization and regulation of genes for amino acid biosynthesis in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12: 21–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00011.x
    [30] Kunji ERS, Mierau I, Hagting A, et al. (1996) The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria. Anton Leeuw 70: 187–221. doi: 10.1007/BF00395933
    [31] Upadhyay VK, McSweeney PLH, Magboul AAA, et al. (2004) Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening, In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, et al., Editors, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, 4 Eds., London: Elsevier Academic Press, 391–433.
    [32] Curtin AC, McSweeney PLH (2004) Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening, In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, et al., Editors, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, 4 Eds., London: Elsevier Academic Press, 435–454.
    [33] Christensen JE, Dudley EG, Pederson JA, et al. (1999) Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Anton Leeuw 76: 217–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1002001919720
    [34] Fox PF, Wallace JM (1997) Formation of flavour compounds in cheese. Adv Appl Microbiol 45: 17–85.
    [35] Khalid NM, Marth EM (1990) Lactobacilli-their enzymes and role in ripening and spoilage of cheese: A review. J Dairy Sci 73: 2669–2684. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78952-7
    [36] Bintsis T, Robinson RK (2004) A study of the effects of adjunct cultures on the aroma compounds of Feta-type cheese. Food Chem 88: 435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.057
    [37] Broadbent JR, McMahon DJ, Welker DL, et al. (2003) Biochemistry, genetics, and applications of exopolysaccharide production in Streptococcus thermophilus: A review. J Dairy Sci 86: 407–423. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73619-4
    [38] Callanan MJ, Ross RP (2004) Starter Cultures: Genetics, In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, et al., Editors, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, 4 Eds., London: Elsevier Academic Press, 149–161.
    [39] Klaenhammer T, Altermann E, Arigoni F, et al. (2002) Discovering lactic acid bacteria by genomics. Anton Leeuw 82: 29–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1020638309912
    [40] Morelli L, Vogensen FK, Von Wright A (2011) Genetics of Lactic Acid Bacteria, In: Salminen S, Von Wright A, Ouwehand A, Editors, Lactic Acid Bacteria-Microbiological and Functional Aspects, 3 Eds., New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 249–293.
    [41] Mills S, O'Sullivan O, Hill C, et al. (2010) The changing face of dairy starter culture research: From genomics to economics. Int J Dairy Tech 63: 149–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2010.00563.x
    [42] NCBI, Data collected from Genbank, 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/.
    [43] Oliveira AP, Nielsen J, Förster J (2005) Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model. BMC Microbiol 55: 39.
    [44] Salama M, Sandine WE, Giovannoni S (1991) Development and application of oligonucleotide probes for identification of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl Environ Microb 57: 1313–1318.
    [45] McKay LL (1985) Roles of plasmids in starter cultures, In: Gilliland SE, Editor, Bacterial Starter Cultures for Food, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 159–174.
    [46] Davidson B, Kordis N, Dobos M, et al. (1996) Genomic organization of lactic acid bacteria. Anton Leeuw 70: 161–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00395932
    [47] Dunny G, McKay LL (1999) Group II introns and expression of conjugative transfer functions in lactic acid bacteria. Anton Leeuw 76: 77–88. doi: 10.1023/A:1002085605743
    [48] Hughes D (2000) Evaluating genome dynamics: The constraints on rearrangements within bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 1: 1–8.
    [49] Hols P, Kleerebezem M, Schanck AN, et al. (1999) Conversion of Lactococcus lactis from homolactic to homoalanine fermentation through metabolic engineering. Nat Biotechnol 17: 588–592. doi: 10.1038/9902
    [50] Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Renault P, et al. (2004) Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1554–1558. doi: 10.1038/nbt1034
    [51] Pastink MI, Teusink B, Hols P, et al. (2009) Genome-scale model of Streptococcus thermophilus LMG18311 for metabolic comparison of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 75: 3627–3633. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00138-09
    [52] Madera C, Garcia P, Janzen T, et al. (2003) Characterization of technologically proficient wild Lactococcus lactis strains resistant to phage infection. Int J Food Microbiol 86: 213–222. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00042-4
    [53] Turgeon N, Frenette M, Moineau S (2004) Characterization of a theta-replicating plasmid from Streptococcus thermophilus. Plasmid 51: 24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2003.09.004
    [54] Hols P, Hancy F, Fontaine L, et al. (2005) New insights in the molecular biology and physiology of Streptococcus thermophilus revealed by comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 435–463.
    [55] O'Sullivan DJ (1999) Methods for analysis of the intestinal microflora, In: Tannock GW, Editor, Probiotics: A critical review, Norfolk: Horizon Scientific Press.
    [56] Solow BT, Somkuti GA (2000) Molecular properties of Streptococcus thermophilus plasmid pER35 encoding a restriction modification system. Curr Microbiol 42: 122–128.
    [57] El Demerdash HAM, Oxmann J, Heller KJ, et al. (2006) Yoghurt fermentation at elevated temperatures by strains of Streptococcus thermophilus expressing a small heat-shock protein: Application of a two-plasmid system for constructing food-grade strains of Streptococcus thermophilus. Biotechnol J 1: 398–404. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600018
    [58] Chevallier B, Hubert JC, Kammerer B (1994) Determination of chromosome size and number of rrn loci in Lactobacillus plantarum by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 120: 51–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07006.x
    [59] Daniel P (1995) Sizing the Lactobacillus plantarum genome and other lactic bacteria species by transverse alternating field electrophoresis. Curr Microbiol 30: 243–246. doi: 10.1007/BF00293640
    [60] Oliveira PM, Zannini E, Arendt EK (2014) Cereal fungal infection, mycotoxins, and lactic acid bacteria mediated bioprotection: From crop farming to cereal products. Food Microbiol 37: 78–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.06.003
    [61] Johnson JL, Phelps CF, Cummins CS, et al. (1980) Taxonomy of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30: 53–68. doi: 10.1099/00207713-30-1-53
    [62] Fujisawa T, Benno Y, Yaeshima T, et al. (1992) Taxonomic study of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group, with recognition of Lactobacillus gallinarum sp. nov. and Lactobacillus johnsonii sp. nov. and synonymy of Lactobacillus acidophilus group A3 with the type strain of Lactobacillus amylovorus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42: 487–491.
    [63] Link-Amster H, Rochat F, Saudan KY, et al. (1994) Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora mediated through fermented milk intake. FEMS Immunol Med Mic 10: 55–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1994.tb00011.x
    [64] Schiffrin EJ, Rochat F, Link-Amster H, et al. (1995) Immunomodulation of human blood cells following the ingestion of lactic acid bacteria. J Dairy Sci 78: 491–497. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76659-0
    [65] Bernet-Camard MF, Liévin V, Brassart D, et al. (1997) The human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain La1 secretes a non bacteriocin antibacterial substance active in vitro and in vivo. Appl Environ Microb 63: 2747–2753.
    [66] Felley CP, Corthésy-Theulaz I, Rivero JL, et al. (2001) Favourable effect of an acidified milk (LC-1) on Helicobacter pylori gastritis in man. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13: 25–29. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200101000-00005
    [67] Pérez PF, Minnaard J, Rouvet M, et al. (2001) Inhibition ofGiardia intestinalisby extracellularfactors from lactobacilli: An in vitro study. Appl Environ Microb 67: 5037–5042.
    [68] Schleifer KH, Ludwig W (1995) Phylogenetic relationships of lactic acid bacteria, In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH, Editors, The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, London: Chapman & Hall, 7–18.
    [69] Hassan AN, Frank JF (2001) Starter cultures and their use, In: Marth EH, Steele JL, Editors, Applied Dairy Microbiology, 2 Eds., New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 151–206.
    [70] Hammes WP, Vogel RF (1995) The genus Lactobacillus, In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH, Editors, The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, London: Blackie Academic and Professional, 19–54.
    [71] Park JS, Shin E, Hong H, et al. (2015) Characterization of Lactobacillus fermentum PL9988 isolated from healthy elderly Korean in a longevity village. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25: 1510–1518. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1505.05015
    [72] Simpson WJ, Taguchi H (1995) The genus Pediococcus, with notes on the genera Tetratogenococcus and Aerococcus, In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH, Editors, The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, London: Chapman & Hall, 125–172.
    [73] Beresford TP, Fitzsimons NA, Brennan NL, et al. (2001) Recent advances in cheese microbiology. Int Dairy J 11: 259–274. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00056-5
    [74] Caldwell S, McMahon DL, Oberg CL, et al. (1996) Development and characterization of lactose-positive Pediococcus species for milk fermentation. Appl Environ Microb 62: 936–941.
    [75] Caldwell S, Hutkins RW, McMahon DJ, et al. (1998) Lactose and galactose uptake by genetically engineered Pediococcus species. Appl Microbiol Biot 49: 315–320. doi: 10.1007/s002530051175
    [76] Graham DC, McKay LL (1985) Plasmid DNA in strains of Pediococcus cerevisiae and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Appl Environ Microb 50: 532–534.
    [77] Daeschel MA, Klaenhammer TR (1985) Association of a 13.6-megadalton plasmid in Pediococcus pentosaceus with bacteriocin activity. Appl Environ Microb 50: 1528–1541.
    [78] Gonzalez CF, Kunka BS (1986) Evidence for plasmid linkage of raffinose utilization and associated α-galactosidase and sucrose hydrolase activity in Pediococcus pentosaceus. Appl Environ Microb 51: 105–109.
    [79] De Roos J, De Vuyst L (2018) Microbial acidification, alcoholization, and aroma production during spontaneous limbic beer production. J Sci Food Agr 99: 25–38.
    [80] Sakamoto K, Margolles A, van Veen HW, et al. (2001) Hop resistance in the beer spoilage bacterium Lactobacillus brevis is mediated by the ATP-binding cassette multidrug transporter HorA. J Bacteriol 183: 5371–5375. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.18.5371-5375.2001
    [81] Snauwaert I, Stragier P, De Vuyst L, et al. (2015) Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer environment. BMC Genomics 16: 267. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1438-z
    [82] Suzuki K, Ozaki K, Yamashita H (2004) Comparative analysis of conserved genetic markers and adjacent DNA regions identified in beer spoilage lactic acid bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 39: 240–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01572.x
    [83] Bergsveinson J, Friesen V, Ziola B (2017) Transcriptome analysis of beer-spoiling Lactobacillus brevis BSO 464 during growth in degassed and gassed beer. Int J Food Microbiol 235: 28–35.
    [84] Garvie EI (1986) Genus Leuconostoc, In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, et al., Editors, Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 9 Eds., Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1071–1075.
    [85] Cogan TM, O'Dowd M, Mellerick D (1981) Effects of sugar on acetoin production from citrate by Leuconostoc lactis. Appl Environ Microb 41: 1–8.
    [86] Klare I, Werner G, Witte W (2001) Enterococci: Habitats, infections, virulence factors, resistances to antibiotics, transfer of resistance determinants. Contrib Microbiol 8: 108–122. doi: 10.1159/000060406
    [87] Endtz HP, van den Braak N, Verbrugh HA, et al. (1999) Vancomycin resistance: Status quo and quo vadis. Eur J Clin Microbiol 18: 683–690. doi: 10.1007/s100960050379
    [88] Moreno MRF, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, et al. (2006) The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106: 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026
    [89] Cappello MS, Zapparoli G, Logrieco A, et al. (2017) Linking wine lactic acid bacteria diversity with wine aroma and flavor. Int J Food Microbiol 243: 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.11.025
    [90] Hugenholtz J (2008) The lactic acid bacterium as a cell factory for food ingredient production. Int Dairy J 18: 466–475. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.015
    [91] Hugenholtz J, Kleerebezem M, Starrenburg M, et al. (2000) Lactococcus lactis as a cell-factory for high level diacetyl production. Appl Environ Microb 66: 4112–4114.
    [92] Hugenholtz J, Smid EJ (2002) Neutraceutical production with food-grade microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotech 13: 497–507. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00367-1
    [93] Hugenholtz J, Sybesma W, Groot MN, et al. (2002) Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria for the production of nutraceuticals. Anton Leeuw 82: 217–235. doi: 10.1023/A:1020608304886
    [94] Hols P, Kleerebezem M, Schranck AN, et al. (1999) Conversion of Lactococcus lactis from homolactic to homoalanine fermentation through metabolic engineering. Nat Biotechnol 17: 588–592. doi: 10.1038/9902
    [95] Börner RA, Kandasamy V, Axelsen AM, et al. (2018) High-throughput genome editing tools for lactic acid bacteria: Opportunities for food, feed, pharma and biotech. Available from: www.preprints.org.
    [96] Johansen E (2018) Use of natural selection and evolution to develop new starter cultures for fermented foods. Annu Rev Food Sci T 9: 411–428.
    [97] EC (2013) Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the council on genetically modified food and feed. Off J Eur Union L 268: 1–23.
    [98] Derkx PM, Janzen T, Sørensen KI, et al. (2014) The art of strain improvement of industrial lactic acid bacteria without the use of recombinant DNA technology. Microb Cell Fact 13: S5. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-S1-S5
    [99] Bachmann H, Pronk JT, Kleerebezem M, et al. (2015) Evolutionary engineering to enhance starter culture performance in food fermentations. Curr Opin Biotech 32: 1–7.
    [100] Zeidan AA, Poulsen VK, Janzen T, et al. (2017) Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: From genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41: S168–S200. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux017
    [101] De Angelis M, de Candia S, Calasso MP, et al. (2008) Selection and use of autochthonous multiple strain cultures for the manufacture of high-moisture traditional Mozzarella cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 125: 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.043
    [102] Terzić-Vidojević A, Tonković K, Leboš A, et al. (2015) Evaluation of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures for production of white pickled and fresh soft cheeses. LWT-Food Sci Technol 63: 298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.050
    [103] Frau F, Nuñez M, Gerez L, et al. (2016) Development of an autochthonous starter culture for spreadable goat cheese. Food Sci Technol 36: 622–630. doi: 10.1590/1678-457x.08616
    [104] Kargozari M, Moini S, Basti AA, et al. (2014) Effect of autochthonous starter cultures isolated from Siahmazgi cheese on physicochemical, microbiological and volatile compound profiles and sensorial attributes of sucuk, a Turkish dry-fermented sausage. Meat Sci 97: 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.01.013
    [105] Casquete R, Benito MJ, Martin A, et al. (2012) Use of autochthonous Pediococcus acidilactici and Staphylococcus vitulus starter cultures in the production of "Chorizo" in 2 different traditional industries. J Food Sci 77: 70–79.
    [106] Talon R, Leroy S, Lebert I, et al. (2008) Safety improvement and preservation of typical sensory qualities of traditional dry fermented sausages using autochthonous starter cultures. Int J Food Microbiol 126: 227–234.
    [107] EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards on the request from EFSA on the maintenance of the list of QPS microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed. EFSA J 928: 1–48.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Natasha Doyle, Philiswa Mbandlwa, William J. Kelly, Graeme Attwood, Yang Li, R. Paul Ross, Catherine Stanton, Sinead Leahy, Use of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Reduce Methane Production in Ruminants, a Critical Review, 2019, 10, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02207
    2. Raphael D. Ayivi, Rabin Gyawali, Albert Krastanov, Sulaiman O. Aljaloud, Mulumebet Worku, Reza Tahergorabi, Roberta Claro da Silva, Salam A. Ibrahim, Lactic Acid Bacteria: Food Safety and Human Health Applications, 2020, 1, 2624-862X, 202, 10.3390/dairy1030015
    3. Simon Khelissa, Nour-Eddine Chihib, Adem Gharsallaoui, Conditions of nisin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and its main uses as a food preservative, 2021, 203, 0302-8933, 465, 10.1007/s00203-020-02054-z
    4. Wei-Kuang Lai, Ying-Chen Lu, Chun-Ren Hsieh, Chien-Kei Wei, Yi-Hong Tsai, Fang-Rong Chang, You Chan, Developing Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Oral Healthy Food, 2021, 11, 2075-1729, 268, 10.3390/life11040268
    5. Lobna Elleuch, Olfa Ben Salem-Berrabah, Yasmin Cherni, Besma Sghaier-Hammami, Mariam Kasmi, Cristian Botta, Ikram Ouerghi, Irene Franciosa, Luca Cocolin, Ismail Trabelsi, Abdelwaheb Chatti, A new practical approach for the biological treatment of a mixture of cheese whey and white wastewaters using Kefir grains, 2020, 27, 0944-1344, 33127, 10.1007/s11356-020-09549-8
    6. Leah B. Bushin, Brett C. Covington, Britta E. Rued, Michael J. Federle, Mohammad R. Seyedsayamdost, Discovery and Biosynthesis of Streptosactin, a Sactipeptide with an Alternative Topology Encoded by Commensal Bacteria in the Human Microbiome, 2020, 142, 0002-7863, 16265, 10.1021/jacs.0c05546
    7. Marknoah Chinenye Nwamba, Fubao Sun, Marie Rose Mukasekuru, Guojie Song, Jean Damascene Harindintwali, Samaila Ajeje Boyi, Haiyan Sun, Trends and hassles in the microbial production of lactic acid from lignocellulosic biomass, 2021, 21, 23521864, 101337, 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101337
    8. Amarela Terzić-Vidojević, Katarina Veljović, Maja Tolinački, Milica Živković, Jovanka Lukić, Jelena Lozo, Đorđe Fira, Branko Jovčić, Ivana Strahinić, Jelena Begović, Nikola Popović, Marija Miljković, Milan Kojić, Ljubiša Topisirović, Nataša Golić, Diversity of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in autochthonous dairy products from Western Balkan Countries - Technological and probiotic properties, 2020, 136, 09639969, 109494, 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109494
    9. Elisa Salvetti, Sandra Torriani, Jinshui Zheng, Sarah Lebeer, Michael G. Gänzle, Giovanna E. Felis, 2020, 9780081005965, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818766-1.00050-7
    10. Ana C. Mendes, Ioannis S. Chronakis, Electrohydrodynamic encapsulation of probiotics: A review, 2021, 117, 0268005X, 106688, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106688
    11. Larissa Cardoso Silva, Heitor de Souza Lago, Márcia Oliveira Terra Rocha, Vanessa Sales de Oliveira, Roberto Laureano-Melo, Evandro Toledo Gerhardt Stutz, Breno Pereira de Paula, José Francisco Pereira Martins, Rosa Helena Luchese, André Fioravante Guerra, Paula Rodrigues, Craft Beers Fermented by Potential Probiotic Yeast or Lacticaseibacilli Strains Promote Antidepressant-Like Behavior in Swiss Webster Mice, 2021, 1867-1306, 10.1007/s12602-020-09736-6
    12. Baltasar Mayo, Javier Rodríguez, Lucía Vázquez, Ana Belén Flórez, Microbial Interactions within the Cheese Ecosystem and Their Application to Improve Quality and Safety, 2021, 10, 2304-8158, 602, 10.3390/foods10030602
    13. Sungmin Jung, Chaerin Woo, Joanna Ivy Irorita Fugaban, Jorge Enrique Vazquez Bucheli, Wilhelm Heinrich Holzapfel, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov, Bacteriocinogenic Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Isolated from Kimchi, a Traditional Korean Fermented Cabbage, 2021, 1867-1306, 10.1007/s12602-021-09772-w
    14. Hoda S. El-Sayed, Heba H. Salama, Amr E. Edris, Survival of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 in spray dried functional yogurt powder during processing and storage, 2020, 19, 1658077X, 461, 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.08.003
    15. Justina Mileriene, Loreta Serniene, Kristina Kondrotiene, Lina Lauciene, Vaida Andruleviciute, Neringa Kasetiene, Dalia Sekmokiene, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Effect of Indigenous Lactococcus lactis on physicochemical and sensory properties of thermo‐coagulated acid whey protein , 2021, 0145-8892, 10.1111/jfpp.15420
    16. Guangqiang Wang, Pengyu Chen, Xiaoqing Yu, Yongjun Xia, Li-Tang Yan, Lianzhong Ai, C18:1 Improves the Freeze-Drying Resistance of Lactobacillus plantarum by Maintaining the Cell Membrane, 2020, 3, 2576-6422, 4933, 10.1021/acsabm.0c00444
    17. Tiara Padayachee, Nomfundo Nzuza, Wanping Chen, David R. Nelson, Khajamohiddin Syed, Impact of lifestyle on cytochrome P450 monooxygenase repertoire is clearly evident in the bacterial phylum Firmicutes, 2020, 10, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-020-70686-8
    18. Maria Carolina Mesquita, Eliana dos Santos Leandro, Ernandes Rodrigues de Alencar, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, Fermentation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and coconut (Coccus nucifera L.) beverages by Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei LBC 81: The influence of sugar content on growth and stability during storage, 2020, 132, 00236438, 109834, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109834
    19. Gacem Mohamed Amine, Hiba Gacem, Djoudi Boukerouis, Joachim Wink, 2021, 9780128219102, 361, 10.1016/B978-0-12-821910-2.00027-8
    20. Nikola Popović, Emilija Brdarić, Jelena Đokić, Miroslav Dinić, Katarina Veljović, Nataša Golić, Amarela Terzić-Vidojević, Yogurt Produced by Novel Natural Starter Cultures Improves Gut Epithelial Barrier In Vitro, 2020, 8, 2076-2607, 1586, 10.3390/microorganisms8101586
    21. An Borremans, Ruben Smets, Leen Van Campenhout, Fermentation Versus Meat Preservatives to Extend the Shelf Life of Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Paste for Feed and Food Applications, 2020, 11, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01510
    22. Erica Kosmerl, Diana Rocha-Mendoza, Joana Ortega-Anaya, Rafael Jiménez-Flores, Israel García-Cano, Improving Human Health with Milk Fat Globule Membrane, Lactic Acid Bacteria, and Bifidobacteria, 2021, 9, 2076-2607, 341, 10.3390/microorganisms9020341
    23. Oktay YERLIKAYA, Derya SAYGILI, Asli AKPINAR, Evaluation of antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from commercial yoghurt starter cultures, 2020, 1678-457X, 10.1590/fst.03920
    24. Mahmoud S.M. Mohamed, Fouad M.F. Elshaghabee, Sulaiman Ali Alharbi, Ahmed El-Hussein, The Prospective Beneficial Effects of Red Laser Exposure on Lactocaseibacillus casei Fermentation of Skim Milk, 2020, 9, 2079-7737, 256, 10.3390/biology9090256
    25. Ge Zhao, Jianming Liu, Jie Zhao, Robin Dorau, Peter Ruhdal Jensen, Christian Solem, Efficient Production of Nisin A from Low-Value Dairy Side Streams Using a Nonengineered Dairy Lactococcus lactis Strain with Low Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity, 2021, 69, 0021-8561, 2826, 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07816
    26. Tengku Haziyamin TENGKU ABDUL HAMİD, Nur FATİN AMYSYA, LACTIC ACID BACTERIUM WITH ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES FROM SELECTED MALAY TRADITIONAL FERMENTED FOODS, 2020, 2651-4621, 10.38001/ijlsb.781522
    27. Justina Mileriene, Loreta Serniene, Marta Henriques, David Gomes, Carlos Pereira, Kristina Kondrotiene, Neringa Kasetiene, Lina Lauciene, Dalia Sekmokiene, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Effect of liquid whey protein concentrate–based edible coating enriched with cinnamon carbon dioxide extract on the quality and shelf life of Eastern European curd cheese, 2021, 104, 00220302, 1504, 10.3168/jds.2020-18732
    28. Gyu-Sung Cho, Olakunle Fagbemigun, Erik Brinks, Gbenga A. Adewumi, Folarin A. Oguntoyinbo, Charles M. A. P. Franz, David Rasko, Draft Genome Sequences of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii Strains from African Fermented Nono, 2020, 9, 2576-098X, 10.1128/MRA.01342-19
    29. Jhonatan A. Hernandez-Valdes, Ana Solopova, Oscar P. Kuipers, Development of Lactococcus lactis Biosensors for Detection of Diacetyl, 2020, 11, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01032
    30. Aneta Ciosek, Katarzyna Fulara, Olga Hrabia, Paweł Satora, Aleksander Poreda, Chemical Composition of Sour Beer Resulting from Supplementation the Fermentation Medium with Magnesium and Zinc Ions, 2020, 10, 2218-273X, 1599, 10.3390/biom10121599
    31. LUÍS AUGUSTO NERO, CAIO FIALHO de FREITAS, LARA MARIA VIEIRA FLORES CARVALHO, CRISTINA CONSTANTINO, 3M Petrifilm Lactic Acid Bacteria Count Plate Is a Reliable Tool for Enumerating Lactic Acid Bacteria in Bacon, 2020, 83, 0362-028X, 1757, 10.4315/JFP-20-155
    32. Adriana Criste, Lucian Copolovici, Dana Copolovici, Melinda Kovacs, Robert H. Madden, Nicolae Corcionivoschi, Ozan Gundogdu, Mihaela Berchez, Adriana Cristina Urcan, Jasbir Singh Bedi, Determination of changes in the microbial and chemical composition of Țaga cheese during maturation, 2020, 15, 1932-6203, e0242824, 10.1371/journal.pone.0242824
    33. Alex MacLean, Anondo Bley, Vasu D. Appanna, 2021, 9780128200841, 101, 10.1016/B978-0-12-820084-1.00005-3
    34. María del Pilar Angarita-Díaz, Johanna C. Arias, Claudia Bedoya-Correa, María J. Cepeda, María F. Arboleda, Juan M. Chacón, Yenny Leal, The effect of commercial functional food with probiotics on microorganisms from early carious lesions, 2020, 10, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-020-67775-z
    35. Cécile Philippe, Amel Chaïb, Fety Jaomanjaka, Olivier Claisse, Patrick M. Lucas, Johan Samot, Christian Cambillau, Claire Le Marrec, Characterization of the First Virulent Phage Infecting Oenococcus oeni, the Queen of the Cellars, 2021, 11, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596541
    36. Carla Martín, Iván Fernández-Vega, Juan E. Suárez, Luis M. Quirós, Adherence of Lactobacillus salivarius to HeLa Cells Promotes Changes in the Expression of the Genes Involved in Biosynthesis of Their Ligands, 2020, 10, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03019
    37. Ranjana Sharma, Prakrati Garg, Pradeep Kumar, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Saurabh Kulshrestha, Microbial Fermentation and Its Role in Quality Improvement of Fermented Foods, 2020, 6, 2311-5637, 106, 10.3390/fermentation6040106
    38. Larissa P. Margalho, Marcelo D'Elia Feliciano, Christian E. Silva, Júlia S. Abreu, Marcos Vinícius Fiorentini Piran, Anderson S. Sant'Ana, Brazilian artisanal cheeses are rich and diverse sources of nonstarter lactic acid bacteria regarding technological, biopreservative, and safety properties—Insights through multivariate analysis, 2020, 103, 00220302, 7908, 10.3168/jds.2020-18194
    39. Kaidi Peng, Mohamed Koubaa, Olivier Bals, Eugène Vorobiev, Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields on the Growth and Acidification Kinetics of Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp. bulgaricus, 2020, 9, 2304-8158, 1146, 10.3390/foods9091146
    40. Yingying Hu, Lang Zhang, Rongxin Wen, Qian Chen, Baohua Kong, Role of lactic acid bacteria in flavor development in traditional Chinese fermented foods: A review, 2020, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2020.1858269
    41. Hyun-Wook Baek, Seul-Ah Kim, Won-Ki Min, Shin Dal Kang, Sangmin Shim, Nam Soo Han, Jin-Ho Seo, A Species-Specific qPCR Method for Enumeration of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Lactobacillus brevis, and Lactobacillus curvatus During Cocultivation in Sourdough, 2021, 14, 1936-9751, 750, 10.1007/s12161-020-01920-2
    42. María Jesús Rodríguez-Sojo, Antonio Jesús Ruiz-Malagón, María Elena Rodríguez-Cabezas, Julio Gálvez, Alba Rodríguez-Nogales, Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Insights, 2021, 13, 2072-6643, 1016, 10.3390/nu13031016
    43. Sepideh Gharehyakheh, Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) production using Lactobacillus sp. Makhdzir Naser‐1 (GQ451633) in the cherry‐kefir beverage , 2021, 0145-8892, 10.1111/jfpp.15521
    44. Nasim Khorshidian, Mojtaba Yousefi, Neda Mollakhalili Meybodi, Amir M. Mortazavian, 2021, 9780128185889, 259, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818588-9.00018-8
    45. S.C. Ribeiro, M.C. Coelho, C.C.G. Silva, A rapid screening method to evaluate acidifying activity by lactic acid bacteria, 2021, 185, 01677012, 106227, 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106227
    46. Edwin Hlangwani, Patrick Berka Njobeh, Chiemela Enyinnaya Chinma, Ajibola Bamikole Oyedeji, Beatrice Mofoluwaso Fasogbon, Samson Adeoye Oyeyinka, Sunday Samuel Sobowale, Olayemi Eyituoyo Dudu, Tumisi Beiri Jeremiah Molelekoa, Hema Kesa, Jonathan D. Wilkin, Oluwafemi Ayodeji Adebo, 2023, 9780323983419, 15, 10.1016/B978-0-323-98341-9.00031-1
    47. Ilias Apostolakos, Spiros Paramithiotis, Marios Mataragas, Functional and Safety Characterization of Weissella paramesenteroides Strains Isolated from Dairy Products through Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomics, 2022, 3, 2624-862X, 799, 10.3390/dairy3040055
    48. Heng Li, Nancy E. Ramia, Frédéric Borges, Anne-Marie Revol-Junelles, Finn Kvist Vogensen, Jørgen J. Leisner, Identification of Potential Citrate Metabolism Pathways in Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, 2021, 9, 2076-2607, 2169, 10.3390/microorganisms9102169
    49. Asli Akpinar, Oktay Yerlikaya, Some potential beneficial properties of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei and Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains originating from raw milk and kefir grains , 2021, 45, 0145-8892, 10.1111/jfpp.15986
    50. Gabriele Rocchetti, Annalisa Rebecchi, Michele Dallolio, Gianpaolo Braceschi, Rubén Domínguez, Giuliano Dallolio, Marco Trevisan, José M. Lorenzo, Luigi Lucini, Changes in the chemical and sensory profile of ripened Italian salami following the addition of different microbial starters, 2021, 180, 03091740, 108584, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108584
    51. Abel T. Ingle, Nathaniel W. Fortney, Kevin A. Walters, Timothy J. Donohue, Daniel R. Noguera, Mixed Acid Fermentation of Carbohydrate-Rich Dairy Manure Hydrolysate, 2021, 9, 2296-4185, 10.3389/fbioe.2021.724304
    52. Konstantin V. Moiseenko, Anna V. Begunova, Olga S. Savinova, Olga A. Glazunova, Irina V. Rozhkova, Tatyana V. Fedorova, Biochemical and Genomic Characterization of Two New Strains of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Isolated from the Traditional Corn-Based Beverage of South Africa, Mahewu, and Their Comparison with Strains Isolated from Kefir Grains, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 223, 10.3390/foods12010223
    53. Harpreet Kaur, Gurjeet Kaur, Syed Azmal Ali, Dairy-Based Probiotic-Fermented Functional Foods: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 425, 10.3390/fermentation8090425
    54. Ricardo V. Duarte, Carlos A. Pinto, Ana M. Gomes, Ivonne Delgadillo, Jorge A. Saraiva, A microbiological perspective of raw milk preserved at room temperature using hyperbaric storage compared to refrigerated storage, 2022, 78, 14668564, 103019, 10.1016/j.ifset.2022.103019
    55. Charles Obinwanne Okoye, Ke Dong, Yongli Wang, Lu Gao, Xia Li, Yanfang Wu, Jianxiong Jiang, Comparative genomics reveals the organic acid biosynthesis metabolic pathways among five lactic acid bacterial species isolated from fermented vegetables, 2022, 70, 18716784, 73, 10.1016/j.nbt.2022.05.001
    56. Jiangli Wu, Wenkang Hu, Yongde Zeng, Zhengbin Yang, xuefeng zeng, Effect of Flours Addition on the Physicochemical and Metabolome in Suanjiang, a Chinese Traditional Fermentation Coagulant, 2023, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4350082
    57. S. H. Sandez Penidez, M. A. Velasco Manini, C. L. Gerez, G. C. Rollan, Consortia of lactic acid bacteria strains increase the antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds of quinoa sourdough - based biscuits, 2023, 39, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-023-03538-y
    58. Sargun Malik, Kiruba Krishnaswamy, Azlin Mustapha, Development and functional characterization of complementary food using kodo and proso millet with acid whey from Greek yogurt processing, 2022, 46, 0145-8892, 10.1111/jfpp.16051
    59. Rania Anastasiou, Maria Kazou, Marina Georgalaki, Anastasios Aktypis, Georgia Zoumpopoulou, Effie Tsakalidou, Omics Approaches to Assess Flavor Development in Cheese, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 188, 10.3390/foods11020188
    60. Alessandro Bianchi, Isabella Taglieri, Francesca Venturi, Chiara Sanmartin, Giuseppe Ferroni, Monica Macaluso, Fabrizio Palla, Guido Flamini, Angela Zinnai, Technological Improvements on FML in the Chianti Classico Wine Production: Co-Inoculation or Sequential Inoculation?, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 1011, 10.3390/foods11071011
    61. Elena Nikitina, Tatyana Petrova, Adel Vafina, Asya Ezhkova, Monyr Nait Yahia, Airat Kayumov, Textural and Functional Properties of Skimmed and Whole Milk Fermented by Novel Lactiplantibacillus plantarum AG10 Strain Isolated from Silage, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 290, 10.3390/fermentation8060290
    62. Yuwei Sun, Shiyao Zhang, Hong Li, Jiang Zhu, Zhijia Liu, Xiaosong Hu, Junjie Yi, Assessments of Probiotic Potentials of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains Isolated From Chinese Traditional Fermented Food: Phenotypic and Genomic Analysis, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.895132
    63. Esther Alonso García, Juan José de la Fuente Ordoñez, Leyre Lavilla Lerma, María D. Estudillo-Martínez, Sonia Castillo-Gutiérrez, Nabil Benomar, Charles W. Knapp, Hikmate Abriouel, Transcriptomic Profile and Probiotic Properties of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus Pre-adapted to Edible Oils, 2021, 12, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.747043
    64. Pooja Attri, Drukshakshi Jodha, Poonam Bansal, Jasbir Singh, Suman Dhanda, Membrane Bound Aminopeptidase B of a Potential Probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici NCDC 252: Purification, Physicochemical and Kinetic Characterization, 2021, 27, 1573-3149, 1641, 10.1007/s10989-021-10197-w
    65. Wanida Pan-utai, Sitanan Thitiprasert, Soisuda Pornpukdeewattana, Arthrospira Cell Residues for Lactic Acid Fermentation as Bioproducts From Waste Utilization, 2022, 10, 2296-598X, 10.3389/fenrg.2022.878597
    66. Raquel Muelas, Gema Romero, José Ramón Díaz, Paula Monllor, Juana Fernández-López, Manuel Viuda-Martos, Marina Cano-Lamadrid, Esther Sendra, Quality and Functional Parameters of Fermented Milk Obtained from Goat Milk Fed with Broccoli and Artichoke Plant By-Products, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 2601, 10.3390/foods11172601
    67. Jheng-Jhe Lu, Meng-Chun Cheng, Darin Khumsupan, Chen-Che Hsieh, Chang-Wei Hsieh, Kuan-Chen Cheng, Evaluation of Fermented Turmeric Milk by Lactic Acid Bacteria to Prevent UV-Induced Oxidative Stress in Human Fibroblast Cells, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 230, 10.3390/fermentation9030230
    68. Yu Hsuan How, Michelle Yee Mun Teo, Lionel Lian Aun In, Siok Koon Yeo, Liew Phing Pui, Development of fermented milk using food-grade recombinant Lactococcus lactis NZ3900, 2022, 28, 23523646, 1, 10.1016/j.nfs.2022.07.001
    69. Joaquín Estrada-García, Eduardo Hernández-Aguilar, Diana I. Romero-Mota, Juan M. Méndez-Contreras, Influence of anaerobic biotransformation process of agro-industrial waste with Lactobacillus acidophilus on the rheological parameters: case of study of pig manure, 2023, 205, 0302-8933, 10.1007/s00203-023-03437-8
    70. Wending Chen, Caiyun Xie, Qianqian He, Jianxia Sun, Weibin Bai, Improvement in color expression and antioxidant activity of strawberry juice fermented with lactic acid bacteria: A phenolic-based research, 2023, 17, 25901575, 100535, 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100535
    71. Muhammad Junaid, Saima Inayat, Nabila Gulzar, Anjum Khalique, Faisal Shahzad, Irfan Irshad, Muhammad Imran, Physical, chemical, microbial, and sensory evaluation and fatty acid profiling of value-added drinking yogurt (laban) under various storage conditions, 2023, 106, 00220302, 39, 10.3168/jds.2022-22358
    72. Hassan Zafar, Milton H. Saier Jr., Comparative Analyses of the Transport Proteins Encoded within the Genomes of nine Bifidobacterium Species, 2022, 32, 2673-1665, 30, 10.1159/000518954
    73. Sang-Hee Lee, Ah-Ram Han, Byoung-Mok Kim, Mi Sung, Sun-Mee Hong, Lactococcus lactis‑fermented spinach juice suppresses LPS‑induced expression of adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokines through the NF‑κB pathway in HUVECs, 2022, 23, 1792-0981, 10.3892/etm.2022.11317
    74. Elena Bartkiene, Romas Gruzauskas, Modestas Ruzauskas, Egle Zokaityte, Vytaute Starkute, Dovile Klupsaite, Laurynas Vadopalas, Sarunas Badaras, Fatih Özogul, Changes in the Microbial Community and Biogenic Amine Content in Rapeseed Meal during Fermentation with an Antimicrobial Combination of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 136, 10.3390/fermentation8040136
    75. Ho Myeong Kim, Seul-Gi Jeong, In Min Hwang, Hae Woong Park, Efficient Citrus (Citrus unshiu) Byproduct Extract-Based Approach forLactobacillus sakeiWiKim31 Shelf-Life Extension, 2021, 6, 2470-1343, 35334, 10.1021/acsomega.1c04335
    76. U Suryadi, R T Hertamawati, S Imam, Fermented meat and digestive tract of snail as amino acid supplements for functional feed of native chickens, 2022, 980, 1755-1307, 012020, 10.1088/1755-1315/980/1/012020
    77. Guangqiang Wei, Qiong Zhao, Yanan Shi, Aixiang Huang, Characteristic flavour compounds and formation of Chinese Rubing cheese: Comparative study between two different acidification technologies, 2022, 75, 1364-727X, 405, 10.1111/1471-0307.12851
    78. Sadia Ahmed, Fatima Ashraf, Muhammad Tariq, Arsalan Zaidi, Aggrandizement of fermented cucumber through the action of autochthonous probiotic cum starter strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus, 2021, 71, 1590-4261, 10.1186/s13213-021-01645-5
    79. Alexandre J.K. Ouamba, Mérilie Gagnon, Gisèle LaPointe, P. Yvan Chouinard, Denis Roy, Graduate Student Literature Review: Farm management practices: Potential microbial sources that determine the microbiota of raw bovine milk, 2022, 105, 00220302, 7276, 10.3168/jds.2021-21758
    80. Anna Łepecka, Anna Okoń, Piotr Szymański, Dorota Zielińska, Katarzyna Kajak-Siemaszko, Danuta Jaworska, Katarzyna Neffe-Skocińska, Barbara Sionek, Monika Trząskowska, Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, Zbigniew J. Dolatowski, The Use of Unique, Environmental Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains in the Traditional Production of Organic Cheeses from Unpasteurized Cow’s Milk, 2022, 27, 1420-3049, 1097, 10.3390/molecules27031097
    81. Sneh Punia Bangar, Shweta Suri, Monica Trif, Fatih Ozogul, Organic acids production from lactic acid bacteria: A preservation approach, 2022, 46, 22124292, 101615, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101615
    82. Agne Vasiliauskaite, Justina Mileriene, Epp Songisepp, Ida Rud, Sandra Muizniece-Brasava, Inga Ciprovica, Lars Axelsson, Liis Lutter, Elvidas Aleksandrovas, Ene Tammsaar, Joana Salomskiene, Loreta Serniene, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Application of Edible Coating Based on Liquid Acid Whey Protein Concentrate with Indigenous Lactobacillus helveticus for Acid-Curd Cheese Quality Improvement, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 3353, 10.3390/foods11213353
    83. Felix Shih-Hsiang Hsiao, Clara Ajeng Artdita, Shih-Yao Lin, Yu-Hsiang Yu, Yeong-Hsiang Cheng, Mixed Solid-State Fermentation of Okara and Copra Meal by Probiotics with Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes and Its Effects on the Growth Performance and Ileal Microbiota in Broilers, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 478, 10.3390/fermentation8100478
    84. MaryClaire Chamberlain, Sarah O'Flaherty, Natalia Cobián, Rodolphe Barrangou, Metabolomic Analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. gasseri, L. crispatus, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Strains in the Presence of Pomegranate Extract, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.863228
    85. Ann L. Power, Daniel G. Barber, Sophie R. M. Groenhof, Sariqa Wagley, Ping Liu, David A. Parker, John Love, The Application of Imaging Flow Cytometry for Characterisation and Quantification of Bacterial Phenotypes, 2021, 11, 2235-2988, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.716592
    86. Lucía Vázquez, Ana Belén Flórez, Javier Rodríguez, Baltasar Mayo, Heterologous expression of equol biosynthesis genes from Adlercreutzia equolifaciens , 2021, 368, 1574-6968, 10.1093/femsle/fnab082
    87. Hsean Ren Loi, Sahar Abbasiliasi, Pandian Bothi Raja, Mohd Shamzi Mohamed, Wen-Nee Tan, Hui Suan Ng, John Chi-Wei Lan, Joo Shun Tan, Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using nitrate reductase produced by Lactobacillus plantarum CAM 4: Characterization and in vitro evaluation of its antimicrobial efficiency, 2023, 376, 01677322, 121476, 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121476
    88. Kritika Sharma, Sarita Bhawanani, Deepak Sharma, Gunjan Goel, Selection of indigenous Lacticaseibacillus paracasei CD 4 for production of gluten-free traditional fermented product Bhaturu, 2022, 36, 0890-5436, 76, 10.1080/08905436.2021.2007395
    89. Sara Tejedor-Sanz, Eric T Stevens, Siliang Li, Peter Finnegan, James Nelson, Andre Knoesen, Samuel H Light, Caroline M Ajo-Franklin, Maria L Marco, Extracellular electron transfer increases fermentation in lactic acid bacteria via a hybrid metabolism, 2022, 11, 2050-084X, 10.7554/eLife.70684
    90. Aicha Yasmine Belarbi, Otávio G. G. de Almeida, Veronica Gatto, Sandra Torriani, Beatriz del Rio, Victor Ladero, Begoña Redruello, Farid Bensalah, Miguel A. Alvarez, Investigating the biotechnological potential of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from different Algerian dairy and farm sources, 2022, 204, 0302-8933, 10.1007/s00203-022-02828-7
    91. Mohammadhassan Gholami-Shabani, Masoomeh Shams-Ghahfarokhi, Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, 2023, 10.5772/intechopen.109729
    92. Irene Martín, Alicia Rodríguez, Josué Delgado, Juan J. Córdoba, Strategies for Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes Using Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Metabolites in Ready-to-Eat Meat- and Dairy-Ripened Products, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 542, 10.3390/foods11040542
    93. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Bacteriocin-Producing Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria in Controlling Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiota, 2022, 12, 2235-2988, 10.3389/fcimb.2022.851140
    94. Katarzyna Petka, Paweł Sroka, Tomasz Tarko, Aleksandra Duda-Chodak, The Acrylamide Degradation by Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 365, 10.3390/foods11030365
    95. Ahmed Adebisi Otunba, Akinniyi Adediran Osuntoki, Wahab Okunowo, Daniel Kolawole Olukoya, Benjamin Ayodipupo Babalola, Characterization of novel bacteriocin PB2 and comprehensive detection of the pediocin gene ped-A1 from Pediococcus pentosaceus PB2 strain isolated from a sorghum-based fermented beverage in Nigeria, 2022, 36, 2215017X, e00772, 10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00772
    96. Mónica María Durango-Zuleta, Mayra Fuentes-Vanegas, José Uriel Sepúlveda-Valencia, Claudia Ximena Moreno Herrera, Isolation, identification, and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria associated with two traditional Colombian types of cheese: Quesillo and double-cream cheese, 2022, 171, 00236438, 114119, 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114119
    97. Xianqi Peng, Abdelaziz Ed-Dra, Min Yue, Whole genome sequencing for the risk assessment of probiotic lactic acid bacteria, 2022, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2022.2087174
    98. Seda Hacıoglu, Buket Kunduhoglu, Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus brevis KT38-3 Isolated from an Artisanal Tulum Cheese, 2021, 41, 2636-0772, 967, 10.5851/kosfa.2021.e49
    99. J.I.I. Fugaban, J.E. Vazquez Bucheli, B. Kim, W.H. Holzapfel, S.D. Todorov, Safety and beneficial properties of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus acidilactici and Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from silage , 2021, 73, 0266-8254, 725, 10.1111/lam.13562
    100. Oluwole Steve Ijarotimi, Opeyemi Rachael Fagoroye, Timilehin David Oluwajuyitan, Jute seed bioactive compounds: amino acids, polyphenolics, antioxidants and hydrolyzing enzymes inhibitory property, 2023, 3, 27725669, 183, 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2022.12.010
    101. Elena Bartkiene, Egle Zokaityte, Vytaute Starkute, Ernestas Mockus, Dovile Klupsaite, Justina Lukseviciute, Alina Bogomolova, Audrone Streimikyte, Fatih Ozogul, Biopreservation of Wild Edible Mushrooms (Boletus edulis, Cantharellus, and Rozites caperata) with Lactic Acid Bacteria Possessing Antimicrobial Properties, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 1800, 10.3390/foods11121800
    102. Amélia Delgado, Nadia Chammem, Manel Issaoui, Emna Ammar, 2022, Chapter 10-1, 978-3-030-63961-7, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-63961-7_10-1
    103. Haritha Meruvu, Sebnem Tellioglu Harsa, Lactic acid bacteria: isolation–characterization approaches and industrial applications, 2022, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2022.2054936
    104. Urszula Zarzecka, Anna Zadernowska, Wioleta Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Patryk Adamski, High-pressure processing effect on conjugal antibiotic resistance genes transfer in vitro and in the food matrix among strains from starter cultures, 2023, 388, 01681605, 110104, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110104
    105. Sawsen Hadef, Tayeb Idoui, Mohamed Sifour, Magali Genay, Annie Dary-Mourot, Screening of Wild Lactic Acid Bacteria from Algerian Traditional Cheeses and Goat Butter to Develop a New Probiotic Starter Culture, 2022, 1867-1306, 10.1007/s12602-022-10000-2
    106. Dipanwita Bhattacharya, Pramod Kumar Nanda, Mirian Pateiro, José M. Lorenzo, Pubali Dhar, Arun K. Das, Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins: Novel Biotechnological Approach for Biopreservation of Meat and Meat Products, 2022, 10, 2076-2607, 2058, 10.3390/microorganisms10102058
    107. Aileen Pua, Vivien Chia Yen Tang, Rui Min Vivian Goh, Jingcan Sun, Benjamin Lassabliere, Shao Quan Liu, Ingredients, Processing, and Fermentation: Addressing the Organoleptic Boundaries of Plant-Based Dairy Analogues, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 875, 10.3390/foods11060875
    108. Wuyundalai Bao, Yuxing He, Jinghe Yu, Xiaofeng Yang, Mingchao Liu, Rimutu Ji, Diversity analysis and gene function prediction of bacteria and fungi of Bactrian camel milk and naturally fermented camel milk from Alxa in Inner Mongolia, 2022, 169, 00236438, 114001, 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114001
    109. Dorota Zielińska, Katarzyna Marciniak-Lukasiak, Marcelina Karbowiak, Piotr Lukasiak, Effects of Fructose and Oligofructose Addition on Milk Fermentation Using Novel Lactobacillus Cultures to Obtain High-Quality Yogurt-like Products, 2021, 26, 1420-3049, 5730, 10.3390/molecules26195730
    110. Melda ONUR, Harun ÖNLÜ, Farklı Gıda Ürünlerinden İzole Edilen Laktik Asit Bakterilerinin Bazı Probiyotik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi, 2022, 2148-2683, 10.31590/ejosat.1041277
    111. Xiaojie Zhou, Zhiqi Liu, Le Xie, Liangyi Li, Wenhua Zhou, Liangzhong Zhao, The Correlation Mechanism between Dominant Bacteria and Primary Metabolites during Fermentation of Red Sour Soup, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 341, 10.3390/foods11030341
    112. Chrysa Anagnostopoulou, Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos, Maria Gaspari, Maria Silvia Morlino, Andreana N. Assimopoulou, Panagiotis G. Kougias, Valorization of household food wastes to lactic acid production: A response surface methodology approach to optimize fermentation process, 2022, 296, 00456535, 133871, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133871
    113. Birsen Yilmaz, Sneh Punia Bangar, Noemi Echegaray, Shweta Suri, Igor Tomasevic, Jose Manuel Lorenzo, Ebru Melekoglu, João Miguel Rocha, Fatih Ozogul, The Impacts of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the Functional Properties of Fermented Foods: A Review of Current Knowledge, 2022, 10, 2076-2607, 826, 10.3390/microorganisms10040826
    114. Caroline Isabel Kothe, Nacer Mohellibi, Pierre Renault, Revealing the microbial heritage of traditional Brazilian cheeses through metagenomics, 2022, 157, 09639969, 111265, 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111265
    115. Pallabi Banerjee, Imteyaz Qamar, 2022, 9780323857932, 93, 10.1016/B978-0-323-85793-2.00002-3
    116. Ronit Suissa, Rela Oved, Harsh Maan, Uzi Hadad, Omri Gilhar, Michael M. Meijler, Omry Koren, Ilana Kolodkin-Gal, Context-dependent differences in the functional responses of Lactobacillaceae strains to fermentable sugars, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.949932
    117. Ana Belén Flórez, Lucía Vázquez, Javier Rodríguez, Baltasar Mayo, Phenotypic and Safety Assessment of the Cheese Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LL441, and Sequence Analysis of its Complete Genome and Plasmidome, 2022, 24, 1422-0067, 605, 10.3390/ijms24010605
    118. Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus, Tales Fernando da Silva, Rafael de Assis Glória, Andria dos Santos Freitas, Monique Ferrary Américo, Lucas Jorge da Silva Fernandes, Gabriela Munis Campos, Gabriel Camargos Gomes, Rhayane Cristina Viegas Santos, Rodrigo Dias de Oliveira Carvalho, Debmalya Barh, Vasco Azevedo, 2022, 9780128222386, 373, 10.1016/B978-0-12-822238-6.00008-X
    119. Dayanidhi Satish Kumar, Palanisamy Venkatachalam, Probing of an Appreciable Antimicrobial Compound Producing Lactobacillus Strain from Milk Products of Thanjavur Region, Tamil Nadu and its Enhanced Production, 2022, 19, 24562602, 917, 10.13005/bbra/3041
    120. Fanny Canon, Marie-Bernadette Maillard, Marie-Hélène Famelart, Anne Thierry, Valérie Gagnaire, Mixed dairy and plant-based yogurt alternatives: Improving their physical and sensorial properties through formulation and lactic acid bacteria cocultures, 2022, 5, 26659271, 665, 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.03.011
    121. Eugénie Kayitesi, Ogheneyoma Onojakpor, Siphosanele Mafa Moyo, Highlighting the Impact of Lactic-Acid-Bacteria-Derived Flavours or Aromas on Sensory Perception of African Fermented Cereals, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 111, 10.3390/fermentation9020111
    122. Jiahui Liang, Michelle Ji Yeon Yoo, Brent Seale, Gianpaolo Grazioli, Nutritional and Volatile Characterisation of Milk Inoculated with Thermo-Tolerant Lactobacillus bulgaricus through Adaptive Laboratory Evolution, 2021, 10, 2304-8158, 2944, 10.3390/foods10122944
    123. Patrycja Cichońska, Małgorzata Ziarno, Legumes and Legume-Based Beverages Fermented with Lactic Acid Bacteria as a Potential Carrier of Probiotics and Prebiotics, 2021, 10, 2076-2607, 91, 10.3390/microorganisms10010091
    124. Aabid Manzoor Shah, Najeebul Tarfeen, Hassan Mohamed, Yuanda Song, Fermented Foods: Their Health-Promoting Components and Potential Effects on Gut Microbiota, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 118, 10.3390/fermentation9020118
    125. Hirosuke Sugahara, Keitaro Nagayama, Shiori Ikeda, Tatsuhiko Hirota, Yasunori Nakamura, D- and l-amino acid concentrations in culture broth of Lactobacillus are highly dependent on the phylogenetic group of Lactobacillus, 2021, 27, 24055808, 101073, 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101073
    126. Mehran Sayadi, Ali Mojaddar Langroodi, Dornoush Jafarpour, Impact of zein coating impregnated with ginger extract and Pimpinella anisum essential oil on the shelf life of bovine meat packaged in modified atmosphere, 2021, 15, 2193-4126, 5231, 10.1007/s11694-021-01096-1
    127. Mehrsa Emkani, Bonastre Oliete, Rémi Saurel, Effect of Lactic Acid Fermentation on Legume Protein Properties, a Review, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 244, 10.3390/fermentation8060244
    128. Urszula Zarzecka, Wioleta Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, Anna Zadernowska, Microorganisms from starter and protective cultures - Occurrence of antibiotic resistance and conjugal transfer of tet genes in vitro and during food fermentation, 2022, 153, 00236438, 112490, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112490
    129. Yizengaw Mengesha, Alemu Tebeje, Belay Tilahun, James Owusu-Kwarteng, A Review on Factors Influencing the Fermentation Process of Teff (Eragrostis teff) and Other Cereal-Based Ethiopian Injera, 2022, 2022, 2314-5765, 1, 10.1155/2022/4419955
    130. Morgan Le Rouzic, Pauline Bruniaux, Cyril Raveschot, François Krier, Vincent Phalip, Rozenn Ravallec, Benoit Cudennec, François Coutte, 2022, 10.5772/intechopen.104958
    131. Jiakuan Niu, Xiao Liu, Junying Xu, Fen Li, Jincan Wang, Xixi Zhang, Xu Yang, Lin Wang, Sen Ma, Defeng Li, Xiaoyan Zhu, Chengzhang Wang, Yinghua Shi, Yalei Cui, Ilenys M. Perez-Diaz, Effects of Silage Diet on Meat Quality through Shaping Gut Microbiota in Finishing Pigs, 2023, 11, 2165-0497, 10.1128/spectrum.02416-22
    132. Nazan Kavas, Functional probiotic yoghurt production with royal jelly fortification and determination of some properties, 2022, 28, 1878450X, 100519, 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100519
    133. Amira M. G. Darwish, Marwa G. Allam, Enaam S. Shokery, Eman H. E. Ayad, Muhammad Hussnain Siddique, Functional products fortified with probiotic LAB isolated from Egyptian dairy sources showed hypolipidemic effects in Albino rats, 2022, 17, 1932-6203, e0263241, 10.1371/journal.pone.0263241
    134. Kemal Sener, Banu Arslan, Sultan Ozselcuk, Ramazan Guven, Resistant Lactic Acidemia Due to Accidental Cheese Starter Culture Ingestion, 2022, 60, 07356757, 228.e1, 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.046
    135. Jegadeesh Raman, Jeong-Seon Kim, Kyeong Rok Choi, Hyunmin Eun, Dongsoo Yang, Young-Joon Ko, Soo-Jin Kim, Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) in Sustainable Agriculture: Advantages and Limitations, 2022, 23, 1422-0067, 7784, 10.3390/ijms23147784
    136. D.B.T. Amadarshanie, T.L. Gunathilaka, Rajitha M. Silva, S.B. Navaratne, L. Dinithi C. Peiris, Functional and antiglycation properties of cow milk set yogurt enriched with Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. flower extract, 2022, 154, 00236438, 112910, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112910
    137. A Djukic-Vuković, D Mladenovic, B Lakicevic, L Mojovic, Lactic acid bacteria: from food preservation to active packaging, 2021, 854, 1755-1307, 012025, 10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012025
    138. Yanni Pan, Yujing Ning, Jing Hu, Zhiying Wang, Xiufeng Chen, Xin Zhao, Mateusz Maciejczyk, The Preventive Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum ZS62 on DSS-Induced IBD by Regulating Oxidative Stress and the Immune Response, 2021, 2021, 1942-0994, 1, 10.1155/2021/9416794
    139. Vera Ganina, Natalia Mashentseva, Inna Ionova, Bacteriophages of Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2022, 52, 2074-9414, 361, 10.21603/2074-9414-2022-2-2371
    140. Poonam Bansal, Raman Kumar, Suman Dhanda, Characterization of starter cultures and nutritional properties of Pediococcus acidilactici NCDC 252: A potential probiotic of dairy origin , 2022, 46, 0145-8892, 10.1111/jfpp.16817
    141. Lucía Diez-Gutiérrez, Leire San Vicente, Jessica Sáenz, Argitxu Esquivel, Luis Javier R. Barron, María Chávarri, Biosynthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum K16 as an alternative to revalue agri-food by-products, 2022, 12, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-22875-w
    142. M. Ibarlucea-Jerez, M.C. Canivenc-Lavier, E. Beuvier, P. Barbet, F. Menetrier, E. Neyraud, H. Licandro, Persistence of fermented food bacteria in the oral cavity of rats after one week of consumption, 2022, 107, 07400020, 104087, 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104087
    143. Shuai Guo, Meixuan Chen, Ting Wu, Kailong Liu, Heping Zhang, Jicheng Wang, Probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Probio-M8 improves the properties and organic acid metabolism of fermented goat milk, 2022, 105, 00220302, 9426, 10.3168/jds.2022-22003
    144. Mirjana Ž. Grujović, Katarina G. Mladenović, Teresa Semedo‐Lemsaddek, Marta Laranjo, Olgica D. Stefanović, Sunčica D. Kocić‐Tanackov, Advantages and disadvantages of non‐starter lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented foods: Potential use as starters or probiotics, 2022, 21, 1541-4337, 1537, 10.1111/1541-4337.12897
    145. Hafize Fidan, Tuba Esatbeyoglu, Vida Simat, Monica Trif, Giulia Tabanelli, Tina Kostka, Chiara Montanari, Salam A. Ibrahim, Fatih Özogul, Recent developments of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria: Facts and gaps, 2022, 47, 22124292, 101741, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101741
    146. Guillermo Eduardo Sedó Molina, Radhakrishna Shetty, Hang Xiao, Anders Peter Wätjen, Miguel Tovar, Claus Heiner Bang-Berthelsen, Development of a novel lactic acid bacteria starter culture approach: From insect microbiome to plant-based fermentations, 2022, 167, 00236438, 113797, 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113797
    147. Hee Seo, Hyunbin Seong, Ga Yun Kim, Yu Mi Jo, Seong Won Cheon, Youngju Song, Byung Hee Ryu, Hee Kang, Nam Soo Han, Development of Anti-inflammatory Probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri EFEL6901 as Kimchi Starter: in vitro and In vivo Evidence, 2021, 12, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.760476
    148. Epp Songisepp, Jelena Stsepetova, Merle Rätsep, Liina Kuus, Anneli Piir, Kalle Kilk, Marika Mikelsaar, Polyfunctional metabolic properties of the human strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Inducia (DSM 21379): Experimental and clinical approaches, 2022, 92, 17564646, 105064, 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105064
    149. Javier Rodríguez, Lucía Vázquez, Ana Belén Flórez, Baltasar Mayo, Phenotype testing, genome analysis, and metabolic interactions of three lactic acid bacteria strains existing as a consortium in a naturally fermented milk, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1000683
    150. Renpeng Du, Liansheng Yu, Ningxin Yu, Wenxiang Ping, Gang Song, Jingping Ge, Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Levilactobacillus brevis HDE-9 and evaluation of its potential use in dairy products, 2022, 217, 01418130, 303, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.057
    151. Justina Mileriene, Loreta Serniene, Beatrice Kasparaviciene, Lina Lauciene, Neringa Kasetiene, Gintare Zakariene, Milda Kersiene, Daiva Leskauskaite, Jonas Viskelis, Yiannis Kourkoutas, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Exploring the Potential of Sustainable Acid Whey Cheese Supplemented with Apple Pomace and GABA-Producing Indigenous Lactococcus lactis Strain, 2023, 11, 2076-2607, 436, 10.3390/microorganisms11020436
    152. Nazan Kavas, Yogurt-like product from lupine (Lupinus albus L.) milk as an alternative to dairy products, 2022, 2308-4057, 377, 10.21603/2308-4057-2022-2-546
    153. Ahmed Osman, Clara Berenike Hartung, Jan Berend Lingens, Kerstin Rohn, Tom Schreiner, Marwa Fawzy Elmetwaly Ahmed, Julia Hankel, Amr Abd El-Wahab, Christian Visscher, Fermentation Characteristics of Rye and Sorghum Depending on Water:Feed Ratio, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 155, 10.3390/fermentation8040155
    154. Márcia C. Coelho, Francisco Xavier Malcata, Célia C. G. Silva, Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheeses: From Starter Cultures to Probiotic Functions, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 2276, 10.3390/foods11152276
    155. R Malaka, F Maruddin, S Baco, M Ridwan, W Hakim, I L Maria, A Alimuddin, Z Dwyana, Determination of the expiration time of Dangke ripening cheese through physico-chemical and microbiological analysis, 2021, 788, 1755-1307, 012094, 10.1088/1755-1315/788/1/012094
    156. Heena Sharma, Fatih Ozogul, Elena Bartkiene, João Miguel Rocha, Impact of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on the techno-functional properties and health benefits of fermented dairy products, 2021, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2021.2007844
    157. Tulsi Kumari Joishy, Mojibur Rohman Khan, 2023, Chapter 17, 978-981-19-5040-7, 327, 10.1007/978-981-19-5041-4_17
    158. Giuseppe Mannino, Graziella Serio, Raimondo Gaglio, Gabriele Busetta, Lorenza La Rosa, Antonino Lauria, Luca Settanni, Carla Gentile, Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant, Antiproliferative, and Antimicrobial Properties of Rubus idaeus Seed Powder, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 2605, 10.3390/foods11172605
    159. Eva-H. Dulf, Dan C. Vodnar, Alex Danku, Adrian Gheorghe Martău, Bernadette-Emőke Teleky, Francisc V. Dulf, Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan, Ovidiu Crisan, Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Lactobacillus Species Single and Co-Culture Fermentation Processes in Wheat and Soy Dough Mixtures, 2022, 10, 2296-4185, 10.3389/fbioe.2022.888827
    160. Rintaro Sato, Motoyuki Ikeda, Tomonari Tanaka, Hitomi Ohara, Yuji Aso, Production of R- and S-1,2-propanediol in engineered Lactococcus lactis, 2021, 11, 2191-0855, 10.1186/s13568-021-01276-8
    161. Hock Wei Tang, Pongsathon Phapugrangkul, Hafizuddin Mohamed Fauzi, Joo Shun Tan, Lactic Acid Bacteria Bacteriocin, an Antimicrobial Peptide Effective Against Multidrug Resistance: a Comprehensive Review, 2022, 28, 1573-3149, 10.1007/s10989-021-10317-6
    162. Mei-Ying Huang, Chia-Yi Lo, Cheng-Yu Lai, Jong-Ding Yu, Po-Tsang Lee, Dietary supplementation of synbiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroide B4 and dextran improves immune regulation and disease resistance of Penaeus vannamei against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, 2023, 132, 10504648, 108498, 10.1016/j.fsi.2022.108498
    163. Atieh Darbandi, Arezoo Asadi, Marzieh Mahdizade Ari, Elnaz Ohadi, Malihe Talebi, Masoume Halaj Zadeh, Amir Darb Emamie, Roya Ghanavati, Maryam Kakanj, Bacteriocins: Properties and potential use as antimicrobials, 2022, 36, 0887-8013, 10.1002/jcla.24093
    164. Xinyang Sun, Simiao Wu, Wen Li, Filiz Koksel, Yifei Du, Lei Sun, Yong Fang, Qiuhui Hu, Fei Pei, The effects of cooperative fermentation by yeast and lactic acid bacteria on the dough rheology, retention and stabilization of gas cells in a whole wheat flour dough system – A review, 2023, 135, 0268005X, 108212, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108212
    165. Javier Rodríguez, Ana González-Guerra, Lucía Vázquez, Raúl Fernández-López, Ana Belén Flórez, Fernando de la Cruz, Baltasar Mayo, Isolation and phenotypic and genomic characterization of Tetragenococcus spp. from two Spanish traditional blue-veined cheeses made of raw milk, 2022, 371, 01681605, 109670, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109670
    166. Simon Sauer, Leon Dlugosch, Felix Milke, Thorsten Brinkhoff, Dietmar R. Kammerer, Florian C. Stintzing, Meinhard Simon, Succession of Bacterial and Fungal Communities during Fermentation of Medicinal Plants, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 383, 10.3390/fermentation8080383
    167. Yu Eun Cheong, Jungyeon Kim, Yong-Su Jin, Kyoung Heon Kim, Elucidation of the fucose metabolism of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG by metabolomic and flux balance analyses, 2022, 360, 01681656, 110, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.11.002
    168. Charles Obinwanne Okoye, Yongli Wang, Lu Gao, Yanfang Wu, Xia Li, Jianzhong Sun, Jianxiong Jiang, The performance of lactic acid bacteria in silage production: A review of modern biotechnology for silage improvement, 2023, 266, 09445013, 127212, 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127212
    169. Kirsi Savijoki, Paola San-Martin-Galindo, Katriina Pitkänen, Minnamari Edelmann, Annika Sillanpää, Cim van der Velde, Ilkka Miettinen, Jayendra Z. Patel, Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma, Mataleena Parikka, Adyary Fallarero, Pekka Varmanen, Food-Grade Bacteria Combat Pathogens by Blocking AHL-Mediated Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation, 2022, 12, 2304-8158, 90, 10.3390/foods12010090
    170. Sreejita Ghosh, Moupriya Nag, Dibyajit Lahiri, Tanmay Sarkar, Siddhartha Pati, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Nilesh P. Nirmal, Hisham Atan Edinur, Rina Rani Ray, Engineered Biofilm: Innovative Nextgen Strategy for Quality Enhancement of Fermented Foods, 2022, 9, 2296-861X, 10.3389/fnut.2022.808630
    171. Ingrid Teixeira Akamine, Felipe R. P. Mansoldo, Alane Beatriz Vermelho, Probiotics in the Sourdough Bread Fermentation: Current Status, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 90, 10.3390/fermentation9020090
    172. Subhrakantra Jena, Smita Hasini Panda, 2023, 9780323983419, 85, 10.1016/B978-0-323-98341-9.00024-4
    173. Nuthathai Sutthiwong, Supaporn Lekavat, Laurent Dufossé, Involvement of Versatile Bacteria Belonging to the Genus Arthrobacter in Milk and Dairy Products, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 1270, 10.3390/foods12061270
    174. Gengan Du, Yudie Qing, Huanzi Wang, Na Wang, Tianli Yue, Yahong Yuan, Effects of Tibetan kefir grain fermentation on the physicochemical properties, phenolics, enzyme activity, and antioxidant activity of Lycium barbarum (Goji berry) juice, 2023, 53, 22124292, 102555, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102555
    175. Olaide Olawunmi Ajibola, Raymond Thomas, Babatunde Femi Bakare, Selected fermented indigenous vegetables and fruits from Malaysia as potential sources of natural probiotics for improving gut health, 2023, 12, 22134530, 1493, 10.1016/j.fshw.2023.02.011
    176. Amélia Delgado, Nadia Chammem, Manel Issaoui, Emna Ammar, 2023, Chapter 10, 978-3-030-91380-9, 197, 10.1007/978-3-030-91381-6_10
    177. Cristina Mihaela Nicolescu, Marius Bumbac, Claudia Lavinia Buruleanu, Elena Corina Popescu, Sorina Geanina Stanescu, Andreea Antonia Georgescu, Siramona Maria Toma, Biopolymers Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria: Characterization and Food Application, 2023, 15, 2073-4360, 1539, 10.3390/polym15061539
    178. Joana F. Fangueiro, Nelson Mota de Carvalho, Filipa Antunes, Inês F. Mota, Manuela Estevez Pintado, Ana Raquel Madureira, Patrícia Santos Costa, Lignin from sugarcane bagasse as a prebiotic additive for poultry feed, 2023, 01418130, 124262, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124262
    179. John Samelis, Charikleia Tsanasidou, Loulouda Bosnea, Charikleia Ntziadima, Ilias Gatzias, Athanasia Kakouri, Dimitrios Pappas, Pilot-Scale Production of Traditional Galotyri PDO Cheese from Boiled Ewes’ Milk Fermented with the Aid of Greek Indigenous Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris Starter and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Adjunct Strains, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 345, 10.3390/fermentation9040345
    180. Diana Ibeth Romero-Mota, Joaquín Estrada-García, Alejandro Alvarado-Lassman, Juan Manuel Méndez-Contreras, Growth kinetics of Lactobacillus acidophilus During the Anaerobic Biotransformation Process of Agro-Sugarcane Waste, 2023, 1877-2641, 10.1007/s12649-023-02100-z
    181. Guillermo Ortiz Charneco, Paul P. de Waal, Irma M.H. van Rijswijck, Noël N.M.E. van Peij, Douwe van Sinderen, Jennifer Mahony, Bacteriophages in the Dairy Industry: A Problem Solved?, 2023, 14, 1941-1413, 367, 10.1146/annurev-food-060721-015928
    182. Kambhampati Vivek, Chandrasekar Venkitasamy, 2023, Chapter 3, 978-981-19-9102-8, 71, 10.1007/978-981-19-9103-5_3
    183. Bianca de Oliveira Hosken, Gilberto Vinícius Melo Pereira, Thamylles Thuany Mayrink Lima, João Batista Ribeiro, Walter Coelho Pereira de Magalhães Júnior, José Guilherme Prado Martin, Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 409, 10.3390/fermentation9050409
    184. Yueqi Wang, Qian Chen, Laihao Li, Shengjun Chen, Yongqiang Zhao, Chunsheng Li, Huan Xiang, Yanyan Wu, Dongxiao Sun‐Waterhouse, Transforming the fermented fish landscape: Microbiota enable novel, safe, flavorful, and healthy products for modern consumers, 2023, 1541-4337, 10.1111/1541-4337.13208
    185. Thisari A Bandara, Srimali P Munasinghe‐Arachchige, Charitha J Gamlath, Fermented whey beverages: A review of process fundamentals, recent developments and nutritional potential, 2023, 1364-727X, 10.1111/1471-0307.12993
    186. Pawade Mohit Manoj, Jenekar Rahi Mohan, Bhosale Yuvraj Khasherao, Rafeeya Shams, Kshirod K. Dash, Fruit based probiotic functional beverages: A review, 2023, 14, 26661543, 100729, 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100729
    187. Galina Sviridenko, Olga Shukhalova, Denis Mamykin, Development and Acid Formation of Lactococci at Technically Significant Temperatures: Comparative Analysis, 2023, 1019-8946, 71, 10.21603/1019-8946-2023-6-18
    188. Özge Kahraman-Ilıkkan, Comparative genomics of four lactic acid bacteria identified with Vitek MS (MALDI-TOF) and whole-genome sequencing, 2024, 299, 1617-4615, 10.1007/s00438-024-02129-2
    189. John Loughrin, Getahun Agga, Nanh Lovanh, Simple Sugars Alter the Odorant Composition of Dairy Cow Manure, 2024, 11, 2076-3298, 145, 10.3390/environments11070145
    190. Xi Wang, Fucan Li, Xiaorui Cai, Yanling Huang, Haitao Shi, Exploring the combination of wilting and different types of additives to improve silage quality of highland alfalfa: Fermentation quality, nutritional values, molecular structural features, and ruminal degradability, 2024, 318, 03778401, 116123, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116123
    191. Volodymyr Vovkotrub, Inga Kowalewska, Ewa Czerniawska-Piątkowska, Olha Iakubchak, Julia Hryb, Modern methods of raw meat processing to reduce microbial contamination, 2024, 15, 2663967X, 55, 10.31548/veterinary3.2024.55
    192.
    193. Sha-sha Zheng, Ying-ying Hu, Li-jun Tan, Liu Yang, Chun-yu Wang, Bao-cai Xu, Innovative insights into dry fermented sausages flavor: Unraveling the impact of varied lactobacillus genera-driven fermentation, 2024, 60, 22124292, 104331, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104331
    194. Yoiner K. Lapiz-Culqui, Jegnes Benjamín Meléndez-Mori, José Jesús Tejada-Alvarado, Denny Cortez, Eyner Huaman, Victor M. Núñez Zarantes, Manuel Oliva, Study of the physicochemical characteristics, antimicrobial activity, and in vitro multiplication of wild blackberry species from the Peruvian highlands, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-54058-0
    195. Zhenyu Liu, Rong Hu, Lunjie Huang, Yunhao Lu, Zhenghong Xu, Yuanlong Chi, Lactic acid bacteria with weak post-acidification potential applied for low-salt paocai fermentation: A perspective from screening to molecular mechanism, 2024, 206, 00236438, 116531, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116531
    196. Gokul Priya Thangavelu, Anand Raj Dhanapal, Ramkumar Samynathan, Baskar Venkidasamy, Muthu Thiruvengadam, Andrey Nagdalian, Mohammad Ali Shariati, 2024, 9780443153464, 259, 10.1016/B978-0-443-15346-4.00010-0
    197. Hocine Remini, Yasmine Remini-Sahraoui, Tassadit Benbara, Djamila Sadoun, From farm to cheeseboard: Harnessing the biopreserving performance and enhancing safety of Lactococcus lactis KJ660075 in goat's milk cheese, 2024, 157, 09586946, 105977, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2024.105977
    198. Xueqi Lu, Mengying Sun, Yuqing Chen, Dashuai He, Yanfeng Tuo, Guangqing Mu, Yinglong Song, Effect of the quorum sensing signal molecule auto-inducer-2 on fermentation performance of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus DPUL-F36, 2024, 62, 22124292, 105346, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105346
    199. Tracy Ann Bruce-Tagoe, Shyju Bhaskar, Ruchita Rao Kavle, Jaison Jeevanandam, Caleb Acquah, Godfred Ohemeng-Boahen, Dominic Agyei, Michael K. Danquah, Advances in aptamer-based biosensors for monitoring foodborne pathogens, 2024, 61, 0022-1155, 1252, 10.1007/s13197-023-05889-8
    200. Xiang-ao Li, Yumeng Sui, Jiasheng Lu, Jing Ren, Baohua Kong, Yongjie Li, Qian Chen, Weiwei Yang, Compensative role of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria in physical properties and taste profiles of dry sausage with partial substitution of NaCl by KCl, 2024, 199, 00236438, 116115, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116115
    201. Kübra Küçükgöz, Marcin Kruk, Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, Monika Trząskowska, Investigating the Probiotic Potential of Vegan Puree Mixture: Viability during Simulated Digestion and Bioactive Compound Bioaccessibility, 2024, 16, 2072-6643, 561, 10.3390/nu16040561
    202. Yuliya Pronina, Talgat Kulazhanov, Zhanar Nabiyeva, Olga Belozertseva, Anastasiya Burlyayeva, Alberto Cepeda, Erik Askarbekov, Gulzhan Urazbekova, Elmira Bazylkhanova, Development of a Technology for Protein-Based, Glueless Belevskaya Pastille with Study of the Impact of Probiotic Sourdough Dosage and Technological Parameters on Its Rheological Properties, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 3700, 10.3390/foods12193700
    203. Sachin Kumar, Sourabh Kumar, Swati Mitharwal, Abhishek Chandra, Prabhat Kumar Nema, Effect of different concentrations of thermoprotectant on microencapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG by spray-drying, and its effect on physicochemical properties and viability, 2023, 30, 2231-7546, 1066, 10.47836/ifrj.30.4.22
    204. Natsag Lkhagvasuren, Gil-Ha Kim, Batchimeg Namshir, Woan Sub Kim, Antibacterial Activity against Pathogenic Bacteria of Lactiplantibacillus argentratensis Isolated from Blueberries, 2023, 41, 2733-4554, 191, 10.22424/jdsb.2023.41.4.191
    205. Carmen Miramontes-Corona, Abraham Cetina-Corona, María Esther Macías-Rodríguez, Alfredo Escalante, Rosa Isela Corona-González, Guillermo Toriz, Lactic Acid Bacterial Fermentation of Esterified Agave Fructans in Simulated Physicochemical Colon Conditions for Local Delivery of Encapsulated Drugs, 2024, 10, 2311-5637, 478, 10.3390/fermentation10090478
    206. Charu Tripathi, Jaya Malhotra, Jasvinder Kaur, Employing Food and Industrial Microbiology to Accelerate Sustainable Development Goals, 2022, 1, 25835327, 22, 10.59118/IFJF3014
    207. José Alejandro Valenzuela, Lucía Vázquez, Javier Rodríguez, Ana Belén Flórez, Olga M. Vasek, Baltasar Mayo, Phenotypic, Technological, Safety, and Genomic Profiles of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid-Producing Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus Strains Isolated from Cow’s Milk, 2024, 25, 1422-0067, 2328, 10.3390/ijms25042328
    208. Xuefei Shao, Huhu Wang, Xiangyu Song, Na Xu, Linlin Cai, Jian Sun, Xinglian Xu, Decoding the flavor regulation mechanism of fermented sausages inoculated with indigenous strains via metagenomic and GC-MS analysis, 2024, 206, 00236438, 116604, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116604
    209. Turkson Antwi Boasiako, Aregbe Afusat Yinka, Xiong Yuqing, Isaac Duah Boateng, Yongkun Ma, Tri-cultured lactic-acetic acid co-fermentation improves stored jujube puree functionality, physicochemical, volatile compounds, and sensory characteristics, 2024, 57, 22124292, 103534, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103534
    210. Mengying Sun, Jiang Yu, Yinglong Song, Xinling Li, Guangqing Mu, Yanfeng Tuo, Fermented milk by Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Kluyveromyces marxianus shows special physicochemical and aroma formation during the storage, 2023, 55, 22124292, 103025, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103025
    211. T. Jayasree Joshi, Salini S.V, Lakshmi Mohan, P. Nandagopal, Jobil J. Arakal, Functional metabolites of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in fermented dairy products, 2024, 3, 29498244, 100341, 10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100341
    212. Negin Ghazanfari, Fereshteh Falah, Farideh Tabatabaei Yazdi, Behrooz Alizadeh Behbahani, Alireza Vasiee, Development and characterization of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-enriched functional yogurt using Limosilactobacillus fermentum 4–17, 2024, 4, 27725022, 100557, 10.1016/j.afres.2024.100557
    213. K. V. Moiseenko, A. V. Shabaev, O. A. Glazunova, O. S. Savinova, T. V. Fedorova, Fatty Acid Profiles Change and the Volatile Organic Compounds Formation During the Cow’S Milk Fermentation with Probiotic Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Strains, 2023, 59, 0555-1099, 483, 10.31857/S0555109923050136
    214. Federica Montagano, Francesca Dell’Orco, Roberta Prete, Aldo Corsetti, Health benefits of fermented olives, olive pomace and their polyphenols: a focus on the role of lactic acid bacteria, 2024, 11, 2296-861X, 10.3389/fnut.2024.1467724
    215. K. E. Vivekanandan, R. Kasimani, P. Vinoth Kumar, S. Meenatchisundaram, William Arputha Sundar, Overview of cloning in lactic acid bacteria: Expression and its application of probiotic potential in inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024, 71, 0885-4513, 881, 10.1002/bab.2584
    216. Giuseppina Tatulli, Laura Ruth Cagliani, Francesca Sparvoli, Milena Brasca, Roberto Consonni, NMR-Based Metabolomic Study on Phaseolus vulgaris Flour Fermented by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts, 2023, 28, 1420-3049, 4864, 10.3390/molecules28124864
    217. Weina Song, Huifei Yi, Fei Lu, Yu Deng, Minpeng Zhu, Junwei Wang, Xiuhong Zhao, Zhigang Xiao, Yifan Zhang, Correlation between microbial communities and flavor compounds in Suantangzi dough from Liaoning Province, China, 2025, 464, 03088146, 141892, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141892
    218. Cécile Philippe, Jeffrey K Cornuault, Alessandra G de Melo, Rachel Morin-Pelchat, Alice P Jolicoeur, Sylvain Moineau, The never-ending battle between lactic acid bacteria and their phages, 2023, 47, 1574-6976, 10.1093/femsre/fuad035
    219. Tuba Zorlu Ünlü, Semra Topuz, Mustafa Bayram, Cemal Kaya, Evaluation of antioxidant activity and some physicochemical characteristics of pickled vine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves, 2024, 28, 2587-1358, 459, 10.29050/harranziraat.1344099
    220. Graciela A. Miranda-Mejía, Sandra Teresita Martín del Campo-Barba, Teresita Arredondo-Ochoa, Viridiana Tejada-Ortigoza, Mariana Morales-de la Peña, Low-intensity pulsed electric fields pre-treatment on yogurt starter culture: Effects on fermentation time and quality attributes, 2024, 95, 14668564, 103708, 10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103708
    221. D L Rukmi, Z E Fitri, L N Sahenda, Characteristics of kefir based on goat’s milk with different starter combinations, 2023, 1168, 1755-1307, 012031, 10.1088/1755-1315/1168/1/012031
    222. Tiago de Melo Nazareth, Elisa Soriano Pérez, Carlos Luz, Giuseppe Meca, Juan Manuel Quiles, Comprehensive Review of Aflatoxin and Ochratoxin A Dynamics: Emergence, Toxicological Impact, and Advanced Control Strategies, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 1920, 10.3390/foods13121920
    223. Emma Mani-López, Nelly Ramírez-Corona, Aurelio López-Malo, Latilactobacillus sakei as a starter culture to ferment pepper fruits, 2024, 2, 29498244, 100233, 10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100233
    224. V. Manasa, R. Gobinath, Kiran Kumar, S. Vijay kumar, P. C. Latha, Amol Phule, 2024, Chapter 14, 978-3-031-70568-7, 239, 10.1007/978-3-031-70569-4_14
    225. Samson A. Oyeyinka, Marina Corrado, Brittany Hazard, Bukola A. Onarinde, 2023, Chapter 18, 978-3-031-35842-5, 431, 10.1007/978-3-031-35843-2_18
    226. Rodrigo Sigala‐Robles, María del Carmen Estrada‐Montoya, MarÍa J. Torres‐Llanez, Lourdes Santiago‐López, Adrián Hernández‐Mendoza, Belinda Vallejo‐Cordoba, Verónica Mata‐Haro, Abraham Wall‐Medrano, Aarón F. González‐Córdova, Tracking the metabolite footprint of four lactic acid bacteria in semiskimmed milk: A chemometric analysis, 2024, 77, 1364-727X, 1171, 10.1111/1471-0307.13127
    227. Junli Liu, Wei Zhao, Aixia Zhang, Pengliang Li, Jingke Liu, Dynamics and functionalities of bacterial community during foxtail millet dough fermentation by metagenomic analysis, 2024, 4, 27725669, 343, 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.11.006
    228. Ajay Kumar, Rohit Ruhal, Rashmi Kataria, 2023, 9781394166213, 83, 10.1002/9781394167043.ch3
    229. Shuai Guo, Yue Sun, Ting Wu, Lai-Yu Kwok, Jicheng Wang, Heping Zhang, Metabolic profiling and growth characteristics of a spaceflight-induced mutant of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus: Unveiling enhanced carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism for improved probiotic potential, 2024, 58, 22124292, 103758, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103758
    230. Haotian Cai, Lei Tao, Xianyuan Zhou, Yu Liu, Di Sun, Qingbao Ma, Zhongjie Yu, Wei Jiang, Lactic acid bacteria in fermented fish: Enhancing flavor and ensuring safety, 2024, 16, 26661543, 101206, 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101206
    231. Anindita Deb Pal, Anasuya Pal, 2024, 9780443139321, 47, 10.1016/B978-0-443-13932-1.00026-X
    232. Jiangli Wu, Wenkang Hu, Zhengbin Yang, Xuefeng Zeng, Ziru Dai, Effect of flours addition on the physicochemical and metabolome in Suanjiang, a Chinese traditional fermentation coagulant, 2023, 53, 22124292, 102716, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102716
    233. Sushmita Das, Maloyjo Joyraj Bhattacharjee, Ashis K. Mukherjee, Mojibur Rohman Khan, Selection of a multi-species starter culture for mustard seed fermentation to enhance polyunsaturated fatty acids and improve gastrointestinal health markers, 2024, 59, 22124292, 104109, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104109
    234. N. E. Posokina, A. I. Zakharova, Modern biological methods of processing plant raw materials used to increase its storage capacity, 2024, 7, 2618-7272, 298, 10.21323/2618-9771-2024-7-2-298-304
    235. Shanshan Zhao, Jinzhu Yue, Yue Wang, Junhua Shao, Zijing Li, Mohan Li, The regulation of volatile flavor compounds in fermented meat products mediated by microorganisms: A review, 2024, 62, 22124292, 105180, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105180
    236. Qinglan Xia, Yumeng Lei, Jiadun Wang, Qiang Wang, Probiotic management and inflammatory factors as a novel treatment in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, 18, 2391-5412, 10.1515/biol-2022-0741
    237. Jahnavi Kumari Singh, Palanisamy Bruntha Devi, G. Bhanuprakash Reddy, Amit K. Jaiswal, Digambar Kavitake, Prathapkumar Halady Shetty, Biosynthesis, classification, properties, and applications of Weissella bacteriocins, 2024, 15, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1406904
    238. Amenan Clémentine Kouakou-Kouamé, Florent Kouadio N’guessan, Didier Montet, Marcellin Koffi Djè, 2023, 9780323919302, 239, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91930-2.00009-2
    239. Abiola Folakemi Olaniran, Christianah Oluwakemi Erinle, Olubukola David Olaniran, Clinton Emeka Okonkwo, Adeyemi Ayotunde Adeyanju, Abiola Ezekiel Taiwo, 2024, 9780323983402, 47, 10.1016/B978-0-323-98340-2.00020-1
    240. Yue Sun, Xin Su, Lixia Zhao, Tiansong Sun, Wenjun Liu, Carbon metabolism of a novel isolate from Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 derived through space mutant, 2024, 135, 1365-2672, 10.1093/jambio/lxae205
    241. Aliakbar Gholamhosseinpour, Seyed Mohammad Bagher Hashemi, Fatemeh Safari, Kaouther Kerboua, Impact of ultrasonicated Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum AF1 on the safety and bioactive properties of stirred yoghurt during storage, 2024, 102, 13504177, 106726, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106726
    242. D J S Siregar, E Julianti, M Tafsin, D Suryanto, Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria from black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae fed with empty fruit bunch and tofu waste, 2024, 1352, 1755-1307, 012011, 10.1088/1755-1315/1352/1/012011
    243. Karina Edith Motato Rocha, Valentina Gonzalez-Montero, María Orfilia Román-Morales, Identification of microorganisms in wet coffee fermentation Coffea arabica Var Catimor and Castillo in Jardín, Antioquia-Colombia, using culture-dependent methods, 2024, 31, 01214004, 10.17533/udea.vitae.v31n1a351373
    244. Screening For Potential Exopolysaccharide Producers From Lactobacillus spp Isolated From Locally Fermented Milk (Nono), 2022, 7, 2814-1822, 84, 10.47430/ujmr.2271.014
    245. Carlos Gordillo-Andia, Jonathan Almirón, Jaime E. Barreda-Del-Carpio, Francine Roudet, Danny Tupayachy-Quispe, María Vargas, Influence of Kluyveromyces lactis and Enterococcus faecalis on Obtaining Lactic Acid by Cheese Whey Fermentation, 2024, 14, 2076-3417, 4649, 10.3390/app14114649
    246. Babak Haghshenas, Amir Kiani, Saeideh Mansoori, Ehsan Mohammadi-noori, Yousef Nami, Probiotic properties and antimicrobial evaluation of silymarin-enriched Lactobacillus bacteria isolated from traditional curd, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-37350-3
    247. Alkatuzzakia Akhi, Tanvir Ahmed, Rowshon Ara, Md Rahmatuzzaman Rana, Response surface optimization of thermo-sonication conditions and taro mucilage concentrations for the preparation of soy yogurt, 2024, 15, 26661543, 100918, 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100918
    248. Konstantin V. Moiseenko, Olga A. Glazunova, Tatyana V. Fedorova, Fermentation of Rice, Oat, and Wheat Flour by Pure Cultures of Common Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria: Growth Dynamics, Sensory Evaluation, and Functional Properties, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 2414, 10.3390/foods13152414
    249. Meryem Kübra Satılmış, Hale İnci Öztürk, Talha Demirci, Begüm Denktaş, Nihat Akın, Revealing the proteolytic characteristics of lactobacillus, lacticaseibacillus, and lactiplantibacillus isolates by in vitro and in situ perspectives, 2023, 55, 22124292, 103086, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103086
    250. Yijin Yang, Yongjun Xia, Guangqiang Wang, Xin Song, Li Ni, Lianzhong Ai, Screening appropriate lactic acid bacteria as adjunct starter to enhance characteristic flavor and sensory profiles of Huangjiu (Chinese rice wine), 2024, 62, 22124292, 105300, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105300
    251. Shikai Yan, Pan Huang, Leilei Yu, Fengwei Tian, Jianxin Zhao, Wei Chen, Qixiao Zhai, Metabolomic analysis reveals Ligilactobacillus salivarius CCFM 1266 fermentation improves dairy product quality, 2024, 188, 09639969, 114309, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114309
    252. Luana Faria Silva, Tássila Nakata Sunakozawa, Diego Alves Monteiro, Tiago Casella, Ana Carolina Conti, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov, Ana Lúcia Barretto Penna, Potential of Cheese-Associated Lactic Acid Bacteria to Metabolize Citrate and Produce Organic Acids and Acetoin, 2023, 13, 2218-1989, 1134, 10.3390/metabo13111134
    253. Shujuan Yang, Mei Bai, Weichi Liu, Weicheng Li, Zhi Zhong, Lai-Yu Kwok, Gaifang Dong, Zhihong Sun, Predicting Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus-Streptococcus thermophilus interactions based on a highly accurate semi-supervised learning method, 2024, 1674-7305, 10.1007/s11427-023-2569-7
    254. Giovanna Lo Vecchio, Eleonora Di Salvo, Laura De Maria, Vincenzo Nava, Rossana Rando, Teresa Gervasi, Nicola Cicero, Opuntia ficus indica cladode as fermentation feedstock for lactic acid production by Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 5 , 2023, 1478-6419, 1, 10.1080/14786419.2023.2284253
    255. M GOWTHAM, D DEKA, Isolation, molecular characterization and antibiogram of Lactic acid bacteria from dairy cattle sources of Mizoram, India, 2024, 94, 2394-3327, 203, 10.56093/ijans.v94i3.139233
    256. Mastaneh Ghasemi Amirlo, Mansour Bayat, Alireza Iranbakhsh, Mahshad Khalilian, Effects of Bacteriocin Extracted from Lactobacillus plantarum on Treatment-Resistant Escherichia coli Bacteria Isolated from Humans and Livestock, 2024, 1, 2950-5488, 10.5812/jmb-153862
    257. Kouadio Jean Eric-Parfait Kouamé, Awa Fanny Massounga Bora, Xiaodong Li, Lu Liu, Ibourahema Coulibaly, Yue Sun, Muhammad Hussain, New insights into functional cereal foods as an alternative for dairy products: A review, 2023, 55, 22124292, 102840, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102840
    258. Talitha Meneguelli, Nikolai Kolba, Arundhati Misra, Ana Dionísio, Ana Pelissari Kravchychyn, Bárbara Da Silva, Hercia Stampini Duarte Martino, Helen Hermsdorff, Elad Tako, Intra-Amniotic Administration of Cashew Nut (Anacardium occidentale L.) Soluble Extract Improved Gut Functionality and Morphology In Vivo (Gallus gallus), 2023, 15, 2072-6643, 2378, 10.3390/nu15102378
    259. Bibi Nabihah Abdul Hakim, Ng Jia Xuan, Siti Nur Hazwani Oslan, A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Compounds from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Potential Functions as Functional Food in Dietetics and the Food Industry, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 2850, 10.3390/foods12152850
    260. Tetiana Dyrda-Terniuk, Viorica Railean, Aleksandra Bogumiła Florkiewicz, Justyna Walczak-Skierska, Mateusz Kolankowski, Joanna Rudnicka, Dorota Białczak, Paweł Pomastowski, The impact of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the cream composition: Insight into changes of vitamin D3 content and fatty acid composition, 2025, 161, 09586946, 106118, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2024.106118
    261. Mei-Ying Huang, Bich Ngoc Truong, Tan Phat Nguyen, Huei-Jen Ju, Po-Tsang Lee, Synergistic effects of combined probiotics Bacillus pumilis D5 and Leuconostoc mesenteroide B4 on immune enhancement and disease resistance in Litopenaeus vannamei, 2024, 155, 0145305X, 105158, 10.1016/j.dci.2024.105158
    262. Shujuan Yang, Mei Bai, Lai-Yu Kwok, Zhi Zhong, Zhihong Sun, The intricate symbiotic relationship between lactic acid bacterial starters in the milk fermentation ecosystem, 2023, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2023.2280706
    263. Yining Dong, Elham Chidar, Salwa Karboune, Investigation of in situ and ex situ mode of lactic acid bacteria incorporation and the effect on dough extensibility, bread texture and flavor quality during shelf-life, 2024, 24, 25901575, 101857, 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101857
    264. K. V. Moiseenko, A. V. Shabaev, O. A. Glazunova, O. S. Savinova, T. V. Fedorova, Changes in Fatty Acid Profiles and the Formation of Volatile Organic Compounds During Fermentation of Cow’s Milk with Probiotic Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Strains, 2023, 59, 0003-6838, 636, 10.1134/S0003683823050137
    265. Fernanda Alvarenga Lima Barroso, Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus, Tales Fernando da Silva, Andria dos Santos Freitas, Monique Ferrary Américo, Lucas Jorge da Silva Fernandes, Rafael de Assis Gloria, Gabriela Munis Campos, Rodrigo Dias de Oliveira Carvalho, Túlio Marcos Santos, Juliana Guimarães Laguna, Vasco Ariston de Carvalho Azevedo, 2023, 9780323919302, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91930-2.00002-X
    266. Abeer Majeed Salih, Shaimaa A. M. Ali, Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Dairy Products, 2023, 1158, 1755-1307, 112016, 10.1088/1755-1315/1158/11/112016
    267. Sagnik Sarkar, Shankar Prasad Sha, Kriti Ghatani, Metabolomics of ethnic fermented foods and beverages: understanding new aspects through Omic techniques, 2023, 7, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1040567
    268. Shanshan Zhao, Yuhang Sai, Wanting Liu, Huiwen Zhao, Xue Bai, Wanying Song, Yan Zheng, Xiqing Yue, Flavor Characterization of Traditional Fermented Soybean Pastes from Northeast China and Korea, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 3294, 10.3390/foods12173294
    269. Nimra Arshad, Saeed Akhtar, Tariq Ismail, Wisha Saeed, Muhammad Qamar, Fatih Özogul, Elena Bartkiene, João Miguel Rocha, The Comparative Effect of Lactic Acid Fermentation and Germination on the Levels of Neurotoxin, Anti-Nutrients, and Nutritional Attributes of Sweet Blue Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.), 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 2851, 10.3390/foods12152851
    270. Kristina Kondrotiene, Paulina Zavistanaviciute, Jurgita Aksomaitiene, Aleksandr Novoslavskij, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Lactococcus lactis in Dairy Fermentation—Health-Promoting and Probiotic Properties, 2023, 10, 2311-5637, 16, 10.3390/fermentation10010016
    271. Shumin Lin, Xinxia Zhang, Junren Wang, Ting Li, Li Wang, Effect of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on bioactive components of black rice bran (Oryza sativa L.) with different milling fractions, 2024, 58, 22124292, 103684, 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103684
    272. Anastasia Palatzidi, Olga Nikoloudaki, Maria Garcia Torreiro, Carolina Matteucci, Giovanna Ferrentino, Matteo Mario Scampicchio, Raffaella Di Cagno, Marco Gobbetti, Novel formulations for developing fresh hybrid cheese analogues utilizing fungal-fermented brewery side-stream flours, 2024, 9, 26659271, 100829, 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100829
    273. Xuan Li, Gaiming Zhao, Yangyi Zheng, Yi Wang, Xueyuan Bai, Fuqiang Li, Yue Gu, Chaozhi Zhu, Effects of single fermentation of Lactobacillus sakei and compound fermentation with Staphylococcus carnosus on the metabolomics of beef sausages, 2025, 464, 03088146, 141728, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141728
    274. Albert Krastanov, Philip J. Yeboah, Namesha Dulari Wijemanna, Abdulhakim S. Eddin, Raphael D. Ayivi, Salam A. Ibrahim, 2023, Chapter 7, 978-1-83768-092-4, 10.5772/intechopen.109034
    275. Nicholas Horlacher, Indrawati Oey, Dominic Agyei, Learning from Tradition: Health-Promoting Potential of Traditional Lactic Acid Fermentation to Drive Innovation in Fermented Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 452, 10.3390/fermentation9050452
    276. Gabriella J. Gephart, Ahmed G. Abdelhamid, Ahmed E. Yousef, Comparative genomics and phenotypic assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal cheese as potential starter cultures, 2024, 210, 00236438, 116849, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116849
    277. Daniel Asfaw Kitessa, Review on effect of fermentation on physicochemical properties, anti-nutritional factors and sensory properties of cereal-based fermented foods and beverages, 2024, 74, 1869-2044, 10.1186/s13213-024-01763-w
    278. Mengying Sun, Jiang Yu, Yinglong Song, Xinling Li, Guangqing Mu, Yanfeng Tuo, Metabolomic analysis of fermented milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei cocultured with Kluyveromyces marxianus during storage, 2023, 54, 22124292, 102901, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102901
    279. Mei Bai, Shujuan Yang, Qian Zhao, Dan Wang, Ting Zhang, Lai-Yu Kwok, Zhihong Sun, Fermentation characteristics of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus T50 and Streptococcus thermophilus S10 complex starter: Enhancing fermentation performance, metabolic interaction, and storage stability, 2024, 208, 00236438, 116716, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116716
    280. Siyu Liu, Jiaqi Luo, Xiayu Liu, Ying Shi, Qihe Chen, Integrative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry metabolomics and high-throughput sequencing technology reveal physicochemical characteristics and bacterial diversity of traditionally pickled mustard tuber from different regions of China, 2024, 8, 2399-1399, 10.1093/fqsafe/fyae022
    281. Hyejin Jeon, Kippeum Lee, Joo-Yun Kim, Jae-Jung Shim, Jung-Lyoul Lee, Effect of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7602-Fermented Antler on Sarcopenia in Mice, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 429, 10.3390/fermentation9050429
    282. Kamil Foss, Małgorzata Starowicz, Lucyna Kłębukowska, Tomasz Sawicki, Effect of lactic acid fermentation of red beetroot juice on volatile compounds profile and content, 2023, 249, 1438-2377, 2401, 10.1007/s00217-023-04304-y
    283. Linna Guo, Xuekai Wang, Huilong Chen, Xiaomei Li, Yi Xiong, Hongzhang Zhou, Gang Xu, Fuyu Yang, Kuikui Ni, Exploring the fermentation quality, bacterial community and metabolites of alfalfa ensiled with mugwort residues and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, 2023, 10, 2196-5641, 10.1186/s40538-023-00472-x
    284. Nooshzad Ahansaz, Armin Tarrah, Shadi Pakroo, Viviana Corich, Alessio Giacomini, Lactic Acid Bacteria in Dairy Foods: Prime Sources of Antimicrobial Compounds, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 964, 10.3390/fermentation9110964
    285. Yves Theoneste Murindangabo, Marek Kopecký, Kristýna Perná, Thi Giang Nguyen, Petr Konvalina, Miloslava Kavková, Prominent use of lactic acid bacteria in soil-plant systems, 2023, 189, 09291393, 104955, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104955
    286. F. I. Brigante, P. Solovyev, L. Bontempo, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Applications in Fermented Foods and Plant-Based Beverages: Challenges and Opportunities, 2024, 40, 8755-9129, 3370, 10.1080/87559129.2024.2355271
    287. Ronit Suissa, Tsviya Olender, Sergey Malitsky, Ofra Golani, Sondra Turjeman, Omry Koren, Michael M. Meijler, Ilana Kolodkin-Gal, Metabolic inputs in the probiotic bacterium Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus contribute to cell-wall remodeling and increased fitness, 2023, 9, 2055-5008, 10.1038/s41522-023-00431-2
    288. Silvia Ruta, Matthew Murray, Zoe Kampff, Brian McDonnell, Gabriele Andrea Lugli, Marco Ventura, Massimo Todaro, Luca Settanni, Douwe van Sinderen, Jennifer Mahony, Microbial Ecology of Pecorino Siciliano PDO Cheese Production Systems, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 620, 10.3390/fermentation9070620
    289. Larysa Bal-Prylypko, Svitlana Danylenko, Olena Mykhailova, Liana Nedorizanyuk, Alla Bovkun, Nataliia Slobodyanyuk, Alina Omelian, Anastasiia Ivaniuta, Influence of starter cultures on microbiological and physical-chemical parameters of dry-cured products, 2024, 18, 1337-0960, 313, 10.5219/1960
    290. Hosam Elhalis, Xin Yi See, Raffael Osen, Xin Hui Chin, Yvonne Chow, The potentials and challenges of using fermentation to improve the sensory quality of plant-based meat analogs, 2023, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267227
    291. M. S. Kanochkina, L. A. Ivanova, A. D. Konovalova, O. N. Levin, Features of the selection of starter cultures in the production of functional fermented milk products, 2023, 26, 1997-4736, 511, 10.21443/1560-9278-2023-26-4-511-528
    292. Vikram Kumar, Ananya Rana, Prajakta Jagtap, Tejpal Dhewa, Neetu Kumra Taneja, 2023, 9781119808961, 21, 10.1002/9781394229116.ch2
    293. Huaixiang Tian, Juanjuan Xiong, Haiyan Yu, Chen Chen, Xinman Lou, Flavor optimization in dairy fermentation: From strain screening and metabolic diversity to aroma regulation, 2023, 141, 09242244, 104194, 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104194
    294. Thomas Bintsis, Photis Papademas, The Application of Protective Cultures in Cheese: A Review, 2024, 10, 2311-5637, 117, 10.3390/fermentation10030117
    295. Şehriban Oğuz, Seval Andiç, Isolation, identification, and characterization of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from whey of Kars Kashar cheeses, 2024, 117, 0003-6072, 10.1007/s10482-024-01982-w
    296. Yi Zhou, Qixian Feng, Yan Li, Yue Qi, Fulin Yang, Jing Zhou, Adding rumen microorganisms to improve fermentation quality, enzymatic efficiency, and microbial communities of hybrid Pennisetum silage, 2024, 410, 09608524, 131272, 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131272
    297. Jianwei Zang, Bingxu Yan, Haoyun Hu, Zebo Liu, Daobang Tang, Yuanzhi Liu, Jiguang Chen, Yonggang Tu, Zhongping Yin, RETRACTED: The current advances, challenges, and future trends of plant-based yogurt, 2024, 149, 09242244, 104531, 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104531
    298. Jielin Luo, Wending Chen, Yibo Pan, Qianqian He, Jianxia Sun, Weibin Bai, Unraveling the color evolution and metabolic pathways of pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside during lactic acid fermentation of the strawberry juice color simulation system: A novel perspective through untargeted metabolomics, 2025, 464, 03088146, 141740, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141740
    299. Mehmet Arif Icer, Sena Özbay, Duygu Ağagündüz, Bayram Kelle, Elena Bartkiene, João Miguel F. Rocha, Fatih Ozogul, The Impacts of Acidophilic Lactic Acid Bacteria on Food and Human Health: A Review of the Current Knowledge, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 2965, 10.3390/foods12152965
    300. Maeve Swinehart, Linda J. Harris, Nathan M. Anderson, Yaohua Feng, U.S. Consumer Practices of Homemade Nut-based Dairy Analogs and Soaked Nuts, 2023, 86, 0362028X, 100132, 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100132
    301. H.G. Batikyan, S.S. Mirzabekyan, N.H. Harutyunyan, A.Z. Pepoyan, ԿԱԹՆԱԹԹՎԱՅԻՆ ՆՈՐ ՊՐՈԲԻՈՏԻԿԱՅԻՆ ՇՏԱՄՆԵՐԻ ՀԻՄԱՆ ՎՐԱ ՍՏԱՑՎԱԾ ՅՈԳՈՒՐՏՆԵՐԻ ԿԵՆՍԱԱՆՎՏԱՆԳՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՄԻ ՇԱՐՔ ՑՈՒՑԱՆԻՇՆԵՐ, 2023, 2579-2822, 91, 10.52276/25792822-2023.1-91
    302. Yuli Haryani, Nadrah Abd Halid, Goh Sur Guat, M A R Nor-Khaizura, Asyraf Hatta, Suriana Sabri, Son Radu, Hanan Hasan, Characterization, molecular identification, and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from selected fermented foods and beverages in Malaysia, 2023, 370, 1574-6968, 10.1093/femsle/fnad023
    303. Xinjie Wang, Hongliang Lou, Xue Chen, Lijun Bu, Jiawei Chen, Huadong Xie, Investigation of the role of jiaotou in the processing of Jinhua Dajiao steamed bread using metagenomic and metabolomic analyses , 2024, 22, 1947-6337, 10.1080/19476337.2024.2375255
    304. Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi, Sabrina Strafella, Pasquale Filannino, Fabio Minervini, Carmine Crecchio, Importance of Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Emerging Group of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Sustainable Agroecosystems, 2024, 14, 2076-3417, 1798, 10.3390/app14051798
    305. Ahmed Radhi Jabbar, Ali Hussein Salman, Effect of Using Three Bacterial Isolates of Lactic Acid Bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus 4453, Bifidobacterium bifidum 5144 and Streptococcus thermophilus 5935 as Probiotics on Thyroid Hormones and Liver Enzymes of Common Carp Fingerlings Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus (1758), 2023, 1225, 1755-1307, 012055, 10.1088/1755-1315/1225/1/012055
    306. Daniel Abarquero, Ana Belén Flórez, María Eugenia Tornadijo, José María Fresno, Advantages and disadvantages of autochthonous enterococci strains for their potential use in cheese ripening: a preliminary study, 2024, 59, 0950-5423, 5675, 10.1111/ijfs.17295
    307. Weiwei He, Hanne Christine Bertram, Jun-Yi Yin, Shao-Ping Nie, Lactobacilli and Their Fermented Foods as a Promising Strategy for Enhancing Bone Mineral Density: A Review, 2024, 72, 0021-8561, 17730, 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c03218
    308. Ibaratkan Kurbanova, Lina Lauciene, Kristina Kondrotiene, Gintare Zakariene, Vitalijs Radenkovs, Sandra Kiselioviene, Alvija Salaseviciene, Agne Vasiliauskaite, Mindaugas Malakauskas, Mukarama Musulmanova, Loreta Serniene, Physicochemical, Sensory, and Microbiological Analysis of Fermented Drinks Made from White Kidney Bean Extract and Cow’s Milk Blends during Refrigerated Storage, 2024, 12, 2076-2607, 1832, 10.3390/microorganisms12091832
    309. Archna Singh, Avijit Mazumder, Saumya Das, Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, M. V. N. L. Chaitanya, Probiotics in Action: Enhancing Immunity and Combatting Diseases for Optimal Health, 2024, 2320-3358, 1153, 10.18311/jnr/2024/35894
    310. Dhananga Senanayake, Peter J. Torley, Jayani Chandrapala, Netsanet Shiferaw Terefe, Microbial Fermentation for Improving the Sensory, Nutritional and Functional Attributes of Legumes, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 635, 10.3390/fermentation9070635
    311. Rui Liu, A promising area of research in medicine: recent advances in properties and applications of Lactobacillus-derived exosomes, 2024, 15, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1266510
    312. Jin Yong Kang, Moeun Lee, Jung Hee Song, Eun Ji Choi, So Yeong Mun, Daun Kim, Seul Ki Lim, Namhee Kim, Bo Yeon Park, Ji Yoon Chang, Organic acid type in kimchi is a key factor for determining kimchi starters for kimchi fermentation control, 2024, 10, 24058440, e36860, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36860
    313. Mary S. Kalamaki, Myrsini N. Kakagianni, Apostolos S. Angelidis, Shifts in ovine (Ovis aries) bulk-tank milk microbiota as a function of cold-storage temperature and duration, 2024, 158, 09586946, 106032, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2024.106032
    314. Núria Ferrer-Bustins, Jean Carlos Correia Peres Costa, Fernando Pérez-Rodríguez, Belén Martín, Sara Bover-Cid, Anna Jofré, The Antilisterial Effect of Latilactobacillus sakei CTC494 in Relation to Dry Fermented Sausage Ingredients and Temperature in Meat Simulation Media, 2024, 10, 2311-5637, 326, 10.3390/fermentation10060326
    315. Bahman Panahi, Behnaz Dehganzad, Yousef Nami, CRISPR-Cas systems feature and targeting phages diversity in Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strains, 2023, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1281307
    316. Yun Ji Kang, Min Jae Kim, Tae Jin Kim, Jeong Hwan Kim, Characterization of Two Mannitol-Producing Leuconostoc Strains from Pa-Kimchi and Their Application for Juice and Yogurt Fermentation, 2023, 33, 1017-7825, 780, 10.4014/jmb.2301.01015
    317. Sayen Merlin Sophia Sylvester, Sanjivkumar Muthusamy, Nagajothi Kasilingam, Parameswari Alagarsamy, 2024, Chapter 5, 978-1-0716-3420-2, 45, 10.1007/978-1-0716-3421-9_5
    318. Ankit Bihola, Heena Sharma, M. B. Chaudhary, M. R. Bumbadiya, Deepak Kumar, Shaikh Adil, Recent developments in cheese technologies, 2024, 8755-9129, 1, 10.1080/87559129.2024.2426024
    319.
    320.
    321.
    322. Mohammed A. Falih, Ammar B. Altemimi, Qausar Hamed Alkaisy, Farhang H. Awlqadr, Tarek Gamal Abedelmaksoud, Sajed Amjadi, Mohamad Ali Hesarinejad, Enhancing safety and quality in the global cheese industry: A review of innovative preservation techniques, 2024, 10, 24058440, e40459, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40459
    323. Zubair Hashmi, Ibrahim Maina Idriss, Dawar Khalid, Syed Hassan Abbas, Syed Osama Ali, Mir Muhammad Bozdar, Tanzeel Usman, Muhammad Sameer Hamid, Nadeem Hussain Solangi, 2024, Chapter 6, 978-3-031-71130-5, 89, 10.1007/978-3-031-71131-2_6
    324. Asif Ahmad, Shiza Atif, Khunsha Younas, Nabisab Mujawar Mubarak, 2024, Chapter 7, 978-3-031-71130-5, 131, 10.1007/978-3-031-71131-2_7
    325. Christian Kosisochukwu Anumudu, Taghi Miri, Helen Onyeaka, Multifunctional Applications of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Enhancing Safety, Quality, and Nutritional Value in Foods and Fermented Beverages, 2024, 13, 2304-8158, 3714, 10.3390/foods13233714
    326.
    327.
    328.
    329.
    330.
    331.
    332.
    333. Ardhendu Pal, Koushik Mondal, Soumen Mandal, Soumyadipta Chakraborty, Indrayani Patra, Manik Pradhan, LED-based broadband cavity-enhanced spectrometer for high-sensitive optical detection of diacetyl in gas phase, 2024, 136, 0973-7103, 10.1007/s12039-024-02324-z
    334. Domenico Giuffrè, Angelo Maria Giuffrè, Fermentation Technology and Functional Foods, 2024, 16, 1945-0494, 10.31083/j.fbe1601008
    335.
    336.
    337.
    338.
    339.
    340.
    341.
    342.
    343.
    344.
    345.
    346.
    347.
    348.
    349. Gangavarapu Khaleel, Vijay Singh Sharanagat, Srishti Upadhyay, Shivani Desai, Kshitiz Kumar, Atul Dhiman, Rajat Suhag, Sustainable Approach Toward Biodegradable Packaging Through Naturally Derived Biopolymers: An Overview, 2024, 2520-1034, 10.1007/s41783-024-00180-3
    350.
    351.
    352.
    353.
    354.
    355.
    356.
    357.
    358.
    359.
    360.
    361.
    362.
    363.
    364. Ahmed M. Abd El Tawab, Qinhua Liu, Gang Xu, Xuefeng Han, Feed additives strategies to control methanogenesis in ruminants, Review, 2024, 27, 2344-4592, 90, 10.2478/azibna-2024-0017
    365.
    366.
    367.
    368.
    369.
    370.
    371.
    372. Mallari Praveen, Simone Brogi, Microbial Fermentation in Food and Beverage Industries: Innovations, Challenges, and Opportunities, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 114, 10.3390/foods14010114
    373. Mustafa Atasever, Halit Mazlum, Biochemical Processes During Cheese Ripening, 2024, 19, 2822-3608, 174, 10.17094/vetsci.1609184
    374.
    375.
    376.
    377.
    378.
    379.
    380.
    381. Shailesh S. Sawant, Hye-Young Park, Eun-Young Sim, Hong-Sik Kim, Hye-Sun Choi, Microbial Fermentation in Food: Impact on Functional Properties and Nutritional Enhancement—A Review of Recent Developments, 2025, 11, 2311-5637, 15, 10.3390/fermentation11010015
    382.
    383.
    384.
    385.
    386.
    387.
    388.
    389.
    390.
    391.
    392.
    393.
    394.
    395.
    396. Claudia Teso-Pérez, Areli López-Gazcón, Juan Manuel Peralta-Sánchez, Manuel Martínez-Bueno, Eva Valdivia, María Esther Fárez-Vidal, Antonio M. Martín-Platero, Bacteriocin-Producing Enterococci Modulate Cheese Microbial Diversity, 2024, 87, 0095-3628, 10.1007/s00248-025-02491-7
    397. Katarzyna Waszkowiak, Agnieszka Makowska, Beata Mikołajczak, Kamila Myszka, Véronique J. Barthet, Magdalena Zielińska-Dawidziak, Dominik Kmiecik, Michalina Truszkowska, Fermenting of Flaxseed Cake with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum K06 to Increase its Application as Food Ingredient - the Effect on Changes in Protein and Phenolic Profiles, Cyanogenic Glycoside Degradation, and Functional Properties, 2025, 00236438, 117419, 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117419
    398. Diana Molina, Evelyn Angamarca, George Cătălin Marinescu, Roua Gabriela Popescu, Gabriela N. Tenea, Integrating Metabolomics and Genomics to Uncover Antimicrobial Compounds in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UTNGt2, a Cacao-Originating Probiotic from Ecuador, 2025, 14, 2079-6382, 123, 10.3390/antibiotics14020123
    399. Lu Feng, Jingxia Yang, Liping Sun, Xiaoyan Zhu, Wei Lan, Guangqing Mu, Xuemei Zhu, Changes of Unique Flavor Substances and Metabolic Pathway Brought by Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus WH. FH-19 Fermented Milk during Fermentation and Storage Stage: HS-SPME-GC-MS and HPLC-MS-based Analysis, 2025, 22124292, 105974, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.105974
    400.
    401.
    402.
    403.
    404.
    405.
    406. Darly Silvana Parrado Saboya, Sebastián Lacheros, Juan Carlos Serrato, Evaluación de la producción de ácido láctico a partir de un clúster de microorganismos nativos de una biorrefinería colombiana, 2024, 26, 1909-8758, 8, 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v26n2.112366
    407.
    408.
    409.
    410.
    411.
    412.
    413.
    414.
    415. Tanja Žugić Petrović, Vladimir M. Tomović, Katarina G. Marković, Teresa Semedo-Lemsaddek, Mirjana Ž. Grujović, Probiotics and Honey: Boosting Functional Properties in Dry Fermented Sausages, 2025, 13, 2076-2607, 349, 10.3390/microorganisms13020349
    416. Lucas Filipe Almeida, Solimar Gonçalves Machado, Ramila Cristiane Rodrigues, Maria do Carmo Gouveia Peluzio, Tiago Antônio de Oliveira Mendes, Valéria Monteze Guimarães, Ronald de Vries, Gabriela Piccolo Maitan-Alfenas, Biotechnology approach for conversion of agro-industrial wastes into emerging source of xylooligosaccharides, 2025, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-025-06584-8
    417.
    418.
    419.
    420.
    421.
    422.
    423.
    424. Md. Tanvir Islam, M. Shaminur Rahman, Susmita Roy Chowdhury, Tanay Chakrovarty, S. M. Kador, Md. Mazharul Islam, Khondoker Tanjim Islam, Mohammad Imtiaj Uddin Bhuiyan, Ovinu Kibria Islam, Microbial diversity, functional attributes, and nutritional proficiency of yogurts produced in Bangladesh, 2025, 5, 2731-4286, 10.1007/s44187-025-00274-0
    425. Mehtap Çiftçi, Nilgün Öncül, ARI POLENİ İLE ZENGİNLEŞTİRİLMİŞ PROBİYOTİK YOĞURTLARIN BAZI FİZİKOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ, 2025, 50, 1300-3070, 131, 10.15237/gida.GD25013
    426. Jiasheng Lu, Yumeng Sui, Xin Liu, Jiawang Wang, Jiatong Li, Baohua Kong, Qian Chen, Weiwei Yang, Effect of exogenous DPD on fermentation characteristics and flavour formation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HRB1 in vitro and in a dry sausage model: insights from the quorum sensing system, 2025, 00236438, 117516, 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117516
    427.
    428.
    429.
    430.
    431.
    432.
    433.
    434. Patrick Othuke Akpoghelie, Great Iruoghene Edo, Ali B.M. Ali, Emad Yousif, Khalid Zainulabdeen, Joseph Oghenewogaga Owheruo, Endurance Fegor Isoje, Ufuoma Augustina Igbuku, Arthur Efeoghene Athan Essaghah, Raghda S. Makia, Dina S. Ahmed, Huzaifa Umar, Ahmed A. Alamiery, Lactic acid bacteria: Nature, Characterization, Mode of action, Products and Applications, 2025, 13595113, 10.1016/j.procbio.2025.02.010
    435. Anastasia Palatzidi, Olga Nikoloudaki, Ali Zein Alabiden Tlais, Emanuele Zannini, James A. O'Mahony, Effie Tsakalidou, Marco Gobbetti, Raffaella Di Cagno, Fermented Plant-Based Cream Cheese Analogues Formulated Using Legume Flours and Avocado pulp, 2025, 26668335, 100580, 10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100580
    436. Nurhazwani Sa’aid, Joo Shun Tan, From probiotic fermentation to functional drinks: a review on fruit juices with lactic acid bacteria and prebiotics, 2025, 1082-6068, 1, 10.1080/10826068.2025.2467441
    437.
    438.
    439.
    440.
    441.
    442.
    443.
    444. Mahdieh Iranmanesh, Mitesh Patel, Malvi Surti, Naheed Mojgani, 2025, Chapter 6, 978-981-97-9722-6, 145, 10.1007/978-981-97-9723-3_6
    445. Tchouli Noufeu, Yueqin Li, Ndeye Fatou Toure, Hui Yao, Xiaoqun Zeng, Qiwei Du, Daodong Pan, Overview of Glycometabolism of Lactic Acid Bacteria During Freeze-Drying: Changes, Influencing Factors, and Application Strategies, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 743, 10.3390/foods14050743
    446.
    447.
    448.
    449.
    450.
    451.
    452.
    453. Xiaolu Zhou, Ziqian Zhu, Zihan Sun, Jiayi Xu, Xubiao Meng, Huixian Wang, Ruimin Wang, Fang Chen, Xiaosong Hu, Jiachao Zhang, The fermentation of carambola juice with lactic acid bacteria improves its flavor, bioactive properties, and metabolic composition, 2025, 22124292, 106307, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106307
    454.
    455.
    456.
    457.
    458.
    459.
    460.
    461. ALİ SAĞLAM, Meltem AŞAN ÖZÜSAĞLAM, Chokeberry Extract: Inhibitory Activity on Some Lactic Acid Bacteria and the Growth Stimulative Effect on Limosilactobacillus fermentum MA-7, 2025, 6, 2706-9915, 1, 10.47419/bjbabs.v6i1.283
    462. Lucie K. Tintrop, Marco Meola, Mireille T. Stern, Monika Haueter, Noam Shani, Hélène Berthoud, Barbara Guggenbühl Gasser, Pascal Fuchsmann, Analytical Mapping of Swiss Hard Cheese to Highlight the Distribution of Volatile Compounds, Aroma, and Microbiota, 2025, 0021-8561, 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10980
    463. Chaosheng Liao, Mingjie Zhang, Pan Wang, Xiaolong Tang, Minghong You, Changbing Zhang, Guofu Jia, Wenlong Gou, Ning Mao, Yixiao Xie, Chao Chen, Shiqie Bai, Ping Li, Advancing lactic acid Fermentation: Effects of micro aeration and herbal waste on red clover bioconversion, 2025, 509, 13858947, 161427, 10.1016/j.cej.2025.161427
    464.
    465.
    466.
    467.
    468.
    469.
    470.
    471.
    472.
    473.
    474.
    475.
    476.
    477.
    478. Archna Singh, Avijit Mazumder, Saumya Das, Anmol Kanda, Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, MVNL Chaitanya, Harnessing the Power of Probiotics: Boosting Immunity and Safeguarding against Various Diseases and Infections, 2025, 20, 27724344, 5, 10.2174/0127724344308638240530065552
    479.
    480.
    481.
    482.
    483.
    484.
    485.
    486. Shedrack Thomas Mgeni, Herieth Rhodes Mero, Lewis Atugonza Mtashobya, Jovine Kamuhabwa Emmanuel, Utilizing fruit wastes as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production: A Review, 2025, 27727831, 100188, 10.1016/j.cles.2025.100188
    487. Slavica Vesković, 2025, Chapter 4, 978-3-031-85088-2, 133, 10.1007/978-3-031-85089-9_4
    488. Min Li, Wei Zhao, Huimin Lv, Qiong Wu, Jicheng Wang, Zhihong Sun, Genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic remodeling of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei PC-01 in response to space conditions, 2025, 22124292, 106454, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106454
    489.
    490.
    491.
    492.
    493.
    494.
    495.
    496.
    497.
    498.
    499.
    500.
    501.
    502.
    503.
    504.
    505.
    506.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(21658) PDF downloads(2456) Cited by(351)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog