Application of systemic risk measurement methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a network approach

Viktorija Dičpinigaitienė; Lina Novickytė; Viktorija Dičpinigaitienė; Lina Novickytė

doi:10.3934/QFE.2018.4.798

Quantitative Finance and Economics

2018, Volume 2, Issue 4: 798-820. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2018.4.798

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Application of systemic risk measurement methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a network approach

Viktorija Dičpinigaitienė ¹,
Lina Novickytė ^{2
,
,}

1.
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vilnius University, Sauletekio ave. 9 (II bldg.), LT–10221 Vilnius, Lithuania
2.
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, V. Kudirkos st. 18–2, LT–01113 Vilnius, Lithuania

Received: 12 June 2018 Accepted: 09 September 2018 Published: 09 October 2018
JEL Codes: C010, C020, G280, O310

This article presents an analysis of the literature on systemic risk measurement methods. Only the recent global crisis has particularly attracted the attention of researchers on systemic risk measurement. Global challenges such as Big Data, AI, IoF, etc. also have an impact on expanding the systemic risk measurement capabilities. The growing number of publications in the last decade opens the door to deeper insights into the systemic risk measurement features, summarizing the contribution of research and analyse the mainstream research on systemic risk, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the studies. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to provide a framework to address the relevant gaps in the current discussion on systemic risk measurement by conducting a wide search in Scopus database to identify the studies that used different systemic risk measurement in the period from 2009 to January 2018. A meta-analysis of scientific articles is performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method and using network approach presents the main interconnection of the methods used to measure systemic risk. A critical analysis of these articles addresses some important key issues. The results of this review are important: they will help researchers to develop better research methods and models around systemic risk measurement. Based on the results, it has allowed us to identify the key issues in choosing a method to assess systemic risk and to help researchers avoid pitfalls in using these methods.
- systemic risk measurement,
- network approach,
- meta-analysis,
- financial stability,
- quantitative methods,
- applications,
- mathematical,
- innovation
Citation: Viktorija Dičpinigaitienė, Lina Novickytė. Application of systemic risk measurement methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a network approach[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2018, 2(4): 798-820. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2018.4.798

Related Papers:

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the literature on systemic risk measurement methods. Only the recent global crisis has particularly attracted the attention of researchers on systemic risk measurement. Global challenges such as Big Data, AI, IoF, etc. also have an impact on expanding the systemic risk measurement capabilities. The growing number of publications in the last decade opens the door to deeper insights into the systemic risk measurement features, summarizing the contribution of research and analyse the mainstream research on systemic risk, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the studies. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to provide a framework to address the relevant gaps in the current discussion on systemic risk measurement by conducting a wide search in Scopus database to identify the studies that used different systemic risk measurement in the period from 2009 to January 2018. A meta-analysis of scientific articles is performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method and using network approach presents the main interconnection of the methods used to measure systemic risk. A critical analysis of these articles addresses some important key issues. The results of this review are important: they will help researchers to develop better research methods and models around systemic risk measurement. Based on the results, it has allowed us to identify the key issues in choosing a method to assess systemic risk and to help researchers avoid pitfalls in using these methods.

References

[1]	Abdymomunov A (2013) Regime-switching measure of systemic financial stress. Ann Finance 9: 455–470. doi: 10.1007/s10436-012-0194-1
[2]	Acharya V, Engle R, Pierret D (2014) Testing macroprudential stress tests: The risk of regulatory risk weights. J Monetary Econ 65: 36–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.04.014
[3]	Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2011) CoVaR. NBER, Working Paper, 17454.
[4]	Aikman D, Kiley M, Lee SJ, et al. (2017) Mapping heat in the U.S. financial system. J Banking Financ 81: 36–64.
[5]	Aldasoro I, Angeloni I (2015) Input-output-based measures of systemic importance. Quant Financ 15: 589–606. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2014.968194
[6]	Anginer D, Demirguc-Kunt A, Zhu M (2014) How does competition affect bank systemic risk? J Financ Int 23: 1–26.
[7]	Baek S, Cursio JD, Cha SY (2015) Nonparametric Factor Analytic Risk Measurement in Common Stocks in Financial Firms: Evidence from Korean Firms. Asia-Pac J Financ Stud 44: 497–536. doi: 10.1111/ajfs.12098
[8]	Baglioni A, Cherubini U (2013) Marking-to-market government guarantees to financial systems-Theory and evidence for Europe. J Int Money and Financ 32: 990–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.08.004
[9]	Banulescu GD, Dumitrescu EI (2015) Which are the SIFIs? A Component Expected Shortfall approach to systemic risk. J Banking Financ 50: 575–588.
[10]	Barth JR, Wihlborg C (2017) Too big to fail: Measures, remedies, and consequences for efficiency and stability. Financ Mark Inst Instrum 26: 175–245.
[11]	Battaglia F, Gallo A (2013) Securitization and systemic risk: An empirical investigation on Italian banks over the financial crisis. Int Rev Financ Anal 30: 274–286. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.002
[12]	Battaglia F, Gallo A (2017) Strong boards, ownership concentration and EU banks' systemic risk-taking: Evidence from the financial crisis. J Int Financ Mark 46: 128–146.
[13]	Benoit S (2014) Where is the system? Int Econ 138: 1–27.
[14]	Berger D, Pukthuanthong K (2012) Market fragility and international market crashes. J Financ Econ 105: 565–580.
[15]	Bernal O, Gnabo JY, Guilmin G (2014) Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk. J Banking Financ 47: 270–287.
[16]	Bernardi M, Maruotti A, Petrella L (2017) Multiple risk measures for multivariate dynamic heavy-tailed models. J Empirical Financ 43: 1–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.04.005
[17]	Bisias D, Flood M, Lo AW, et al. (2012) A survey of systemic risk analytics. Annu Rev Financ Econ 4: 255–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101754
[18]	Bluhm M, Krahnen JP (2014) Systemic risk in an interconnected banking system with endogenous asset markets. J Financ Stab 13: 75–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2014.04.002
[19]	Borri N (2017) Local currency systemic risk. Emerging Mark Rev 34: 1–13.
[20]	Cai J, Eidam F, Saunders A, et al. (2018) Syndication, interconnectedness, and systemic risk. J Financ Stab 34: 105–120.
[21]	Cambón MI, Estévez L (2016) A Spanish Financial Market Stress Index (FMSI). Span Rev Financ Econ 14: 23–41. doi: 10.1016/j.srfe.2016.01.002
[22]	Castro C, Ferrari S (2014) Measuring and testing for the systemically important financial institutions. J Empirical Financ 25: 1–14.
[23]	Cerchiello P, Giudici P (2016) Big data analysis for financial risk management. J Big Data 3: 18.
[24]	Cerchiello P, Giudici P, Nicola G (2017) Twitter data models for bank risk contagion. Neurocomputing 264: 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.101
[25]	Chakroun MA, Gallali MI (2017) Contribution of Islamic banks to systemic risk. Int J Banking Accounting 8: 52–92.
[26]	Chang CW, Li X, Lin EMH, et al. (2017) Systemic risk, interconnectedness, and non-core activities in Taiwan insurance industry. Int Rev Econ Financ 55: 1–12.
[27]	Cheng F, Wellman MP (2017) Accounting for strategic response in an agent-based model of financial regulation. Acm Conf Econ Comput 2017: 187–204.
[28]	Chiu WC, Peña JI, Wang CW (2015) Measuring Systemic Risk: Common Factor Exposures and Tail Dependence Effects. Eur Financ Manage 21: 833–866.
[29]	Cipra T, Hendrych R (2017) Systemic risk in financial risk regulation. Czech J Econ Financ 67: 15–38.
[30]	Conciarelli A (2014) A New macroprudential tool to assess sources of financial risks: Implied-systemic cost of risks. Int J Financ Econ 19: 74–88.
[31]	Derbali A (2017) Systemic Risk in the Chinese Financial System: Measuring and Ranking. Chin Econ 50: 34–58.
[32]	Derbali A, Hallara S (2016) Systemic risk of European financial institutions: Estimation and ranking by the Marginal Expected Shortfall. Res Int Bus Financ 37: 113–134.
[33]	Dhar V (2013) Data science and prediction. Commun ACM 56: 64–73.
[34]	Cesare AD, Stork PA, De Vries CG (2012) Risk measures for autocorrelated hedge fund returns. J Financ Econ 13: 868–895.
[35]	Drakos AA, Kouretas GP (2013) Measuring Systemic Risk in Emerging Markets Using CoVaR. Emerging Markets and the Global Economy: A Handbook, 271–307.
[36]	Drakos AA, Kouretas GP (2015) Bank ownership, financial segments and the measurement of systemic risk: An application of CoVaR. Int Rev Econ Financ 40: 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2015.02.010
[37]	Drehmann M, Tarashev N (2013) Measuring the systemic importance of interconnected banks. J Financ Int 22: 586–607.
[38]	Foggitt GM, Heymans A, Vuuren GWV, et al. (2017) Measuring the systemic risk in the South African banking sector. South Afr J Econ Manage Sci 20: 1–9.
[39]	Garciadeandoain C, Kremer M (2017) Beyond spreads: Measuring sovereign market stress in the euro area. Econ Lett 159: 153–156. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.042
[40]	Gauthier C, Lehar A, Souissi M (2012) Macroprudential capital requirements and systemic risk. J Financ Int 21: 594–618.
[41]	Girardi G, Ergün AT (2013) Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. J Banking Financ 37: 3169–3180. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.027
[42]	Giudici P, Parisi L (2017) Sovereign risk in the Euro area: A multivariate stochastic process approach. Quant Financ 17: 1995–2008. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1357968
[43]	González-Hermosillo B, Hesse H (2011) Global Market Conditions and Systemic Risk. J Emerging Mark Financ 10: 227–252.
[44]	Gramlich D, Oet MV, Ong SJ (2017) The contributions to systemic stress of financial interactions between the US and Europe. Eur J Financ 23: 1176–1196.
[45]	Gray DF, Malone SW (2012) Sovereign and financial-sector risk: Measurement and interactions. Annu Rev Financ Econ 4: 297–312.
[46]	Hałaj G, Kok C (2013) Assessing interbank contagion using simulated networks. Comput Manage Sci 10: 157–186.
[47]	Härdle WK, Wang W, Yu L (2016) TENET: Tail–event driven NETwork risk. J Econ 192: 499–513.
[48]	Hespeler F, Loiacono G (2017) Monitoring systemic risk in the hedge fund sector. Quant Financ 17: 1859–1883. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1357969
[49]	Hmissi B, Bejaoui A, Snoussi W (2017) On identifying the domestic systemically important banks: The case of Tunisia. Res Int Bus Financ 42: 1343–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.071
[50]	Huang X, Zhou H, Zhu H (2009) A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. J Banking Financ 33: 2036–2049. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.05.017
[51]	Huang X (2012) Systemic risk contributions. J Financ Serv Res 42: 55–83. doi: 10.1007/s10693-011-0117-8
[52]	IJtsma P, Spierdijk L, Shaffer S (2017) The concentration-stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25. J Financ Stab 33: 273–284.
[53]	Irresberger F, Bierth C, Weiß GNF (2017) Size is everything: Explaining SIFI designations. Rev Financi Econ 32: 7–19.
[54]	Jobst AA (2014) Measuring systemic risk-adjusted liquidity (SRL)-a model approach. J Banking Financ 45: 270–287.
[55]	Jondeau E, Khalilzadeh A (2017) Collateralization, leverage, and stressed expected loss. J Financ Stab 33: 226–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2017.01.005
[56]	Kanno M (2015a) Assessing systemic risk using interbank exposures in the global banking system. J Financ Stab 20: 105–130.
[57]	Kanno M (2015b) The network structure and systemic risk in the Japanese interbank market. Jpn World Econ 36: 102–112.
[58]	Kanno M (2016) The network structure and systemic risk in the global non-life insurance market. Insur Math Econ 67: 38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.12.004
[59]	Karimalis EN, Nomikos NK (2017) Measuring systemic risk in the European banking sector: A copula CoVaR approach. Eur J Financ 24: 1–38.
[60]	Khiari W, Nachnouchi J (2017) Banks' systemic risk in the Tunisian context: Measures and Determinants. Res Int Bus Financ.
[61]	Kleinow J, Horsch A, Garcia-Molina M (2017a) Factors driving systemic risk of banks in Latin America. J Econ Financ 41: 211–234.
[62]	Kleinow J, Moreira F, Strobl S, et al. (2017b) Measuring systemic risk: A comparison of alternative market-based approaches. Financ Res Lett 21: 40–46.
[63]	Klinger T, Teplý P (2014) Systemic risk of the global banking system-an agent-based network model approach. Prague Econ Pap 23: 24–41.
[64]	Klinger T, Teplý P (2016) The nexus between systemic risk and sovereign crises. Czech J Econ Financ 66: 50–69.
[65]	Kreis Y, Leisen DPJ (2016) Systemic risk in a structural model of bank default linkages. J Financ Stab, 1–46.
[66]	Kubinschi M, Barnea D (2016) Systemic risk impact on economic growth-The case of the CEE countries. Rom J Econ Forecast 19: 79–94.
[67]	Kupiec PH, Ramirez CD (2013) Bank failures and the cost of systemic risk: Evidence from 1900 to 1930. J Financ Int 22: 285–307.
[68]	Kupiec P, Güntay L (2016) Testing for Systemic Risk Using Stock Returns. J Financ Serv Res 49: 203–227.
[69]	Kurowski ŁK, Rogowicz K (2017) Negative interest rates as systemic risk event. Financ Res Lett 22: 153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2017.04.001
[70]	Lee JH, Ryu J, Tsomocos D (2013) Measures of systemic risk and financial fragility in Korea. Ann Financ 9: 757–786. doi: 10.1007/s10436-012-0218-x
[71]	Lee J, Lee DH, Yun SG (2016) Systemic Risk on Trade Credit Systems: With the Tangible Interconnectedness. Comput Econ 51: 1–16.
[72]	Leroy A, Lucotte Y (2017) Is there a competition–stability trade–off in European banking? J Int Financ Mark 46: 199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.08.009
[73]	Li F, Perez-Saiz H (2018) Measuring systemic risk across financial market infrastructures. J Financ Stab 34: 1–11.
[74]	Liao S, Sojli E, Tham WW (2015) Managing systemic risk in The Netherlands. Int Rev Econ Financ 40: 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2015.02.012
[75]	López-Espinosa G, Moreno A, Rubia A, et al. (2015) Systemic risk and asymmetric responses in the financial industry. J Banking Financ 58: 471–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.004
[76]	López-Espinosa G, Rubia A, Valderrama L, et al. (2013) Good for one, bad for all: Determinants of individual versus systemic risk. J Financ Stab 9: 287–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2013.05.002
[77]	Ma Y, Chen Y (2014) Financial imbalance index as a new early warning indicator: Methods and applications in the Chinese economy. China World Econ 22: 64–86. doi: 10.1111/cwe.12092
[78]	Martinez-Jaramillo S, Alexandrova-Kabadjova B, Bravo-Benitez B, et al. (2014) An empirical study of the Mexican banking system's network and its implications for systemic risk. J Econ Dyn Control 40: 242–265.
[79]	Martínez-Jaramillo S, Pérez OP, Embriz FA, et al. (2010) Systemic risk, financial contagion and financial fragility. J Econ Dyn Control 34: 2358–2374.
[80]	Mayordomo S, Rodriguez-Moreno M, Peña JI (2014) Derivatives holdings and systemic risk in the U.S. banking sector. J Banking Financ 45: 84–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.037
[81]	Mendonça HF, Silva RBD (2018) Effect of banking and macroeconomic variables on systemic risk: An application of Δ COVAR for an emerging economy. North Am J Econ Financ 43: 141–157. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2017.10.011
[82]	Mensah JO, Premaratne G (2017) Systemic interconnectedness among Asian Banks. Jpn World Econ 41: 17–33.
[83]	Mezei J, Sarlin P (2016) Aggregating expert knowledge for the measurement of systemic risk. Decis Support Syst 88: 38–50.
[84]	Mezei J, Sarlin P (2018) RiskRank: Measuring interconnected risk. Econ Modell 68: 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.04.016
[85]	Milne A (2014) Distance to default and the financial crisis. J Financ Stab 12: 26–36.
[86]	Nucera F, Lucas A, et al. (2017) Do negative interest rates make banks less safe? Econ Lett 159: 112–115.
[87]	Patro DK, Qi M, Sun X (2013) A simple indicator of systemic risk. J Financ Stab 9: 105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2012.03.002
[88]	Pederzoli C, Torricelli C (2017) Systemic risk measures and macroprudential stress tests: An assessment over the 2014 EBA exercise. Ann Financ 13: 237–251. doi: 10.1007/s10436-017-0294-z
[89]	Popescu A, Turcu C (2014) Systemic sovereign risk in Europe: An MES and CES approach. Work Pap 124: 899–925.
[90]	Popescu A, Turcu C (2017) Sovereign debt and systemic risk in the eurozone: A macroeconomic perspective. Econ Modell 67: 275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.032
[91]	Reboredo JC, Ugolini A (2015) Systemic risk in European sovereign debt markets: A CoVaR-copula approach. J Int Money Financ 51: 214–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.12.002
[92]	Reboredo JC, Ugolini A (2016) Systemic risk of Spanish listed banks: A vine copula CoVaR approach [Riesgo sistémico de los bancos españoles cotizados: Una aproximación CoVaR con cópulas vine]. Span J Financ Accounting 45: 1–31.
[93]	Rönnqvist S, Sarlin P (2015) Bank networks from text: Interrelations, centrality and determinants. Quant Financ 15: 1619–1635. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1071076
[94]	Rösch D, Scheule H (2016) The role of loan portfolio losses and bank capital for Asian financial system resilience. Pac-Basin Financ J 40: 289–305.
[95]	Sedunov J (2016) What is the systemic risk exposure of financial institutions? J Financ Stab 24: 71–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2016.04.005
[96]	Sheu HJ, Cheng CL (2012) Systemic risk in Taiwan stock market. J Bus Econ Manage 13: 895–914.
[97]	Siebenbrunner C, Sigmund M, Kerbl S (2017) Can bank-specific variables predict contagion effects? Quant Financ 17: 1805–1832. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1357974
[98]	Silva TC, Souza SRSD, Tabak BM (2017) Monitoring vulnerability and impact diffusion in financial networks. J Econ Dyn Control 76: 109–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2017.01.001
[99]	Souza SRSD, Silva TC, Tabak BM, et al. (2016) Evaluating systemic risk using bank default probabilities in financial networks. J Econ Dyn Control 66: 54–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2016.03.003
[100]	Staum J (2012) Systemic risk components and deposit insurance premia. Quant Financ 12: 651–662. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2012.664942
[101]	Stolbov M, Shchepeleva M (2017) Systemic risk in Europe: Deciphering leading measures, common patterns and real effects. Ann Financ 14: 1–43.
[102]	Strobl S (2016) Stand-alone vs systemic risk-taking of financial institutions. J Risk Financ 17: 374–389. doi: 10.1108/JRF-05-2016-0064
[103]	Trabelsi N, Naifar N (2017) Are Islamic stock indexes exposed to systemic risk? Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. Res Int Bus Financ 42: 727–744. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.013
[104]	Xu S, In F, Forbes C, et al. (2017) Systemic risk in the European sovereign and banking system. Quant Financ 17: 633–656. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2016.1205212
[105]	Yao Y, Li J, Zhu X, et al. (2017) Expected default based score for identifying systemically important banks. Econ Modell 64: 589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.04.023
[106]	Yun J, Moon H (2014) Measuring systemic risk in the Korean banking sector via dynamic conditional correlation models. Pac-Basin Financ J 27: 94–114. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.02.005

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)