Citation: Davide Lovisolo, Marianna Dionisi, Federico A. Ruffinatti, Carla Distasi. Nanoparticles and potential neurotoxicity: focus on molecular mechanisms[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.1
[1] | Zeliha Korpinar, Mustafa Inc, Dumitru Baleanu . On the fractional model of Fokker-Planck equations with two different operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 236-248. doi: 10.3934/math.2020015 |
[2] | Hassan Khan, Umar Farooq, Fairouz Tchier, Qasim Khan, Gurpreet Singh, Poom Kumam, Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet . The analytical analysis of fractional order Fokker-Planck equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11919-11941. doi: 10.3934/math.2022665 |
[3] | Ibrahim-Elkhalil Ahmed, Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Doaa Atta, Meshari Alesemi . A fractional dual-phase-lag thermoelastic model for a solid half-space with changing thermophysical properties involving two-temperature and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6964-6992. doi: 10.3934/math.2024340 |
[4] | Madeeha Tahir, Ayesha Naz, Muhammad Imran, Hasan Waqas, Ali Akgül, Hussein Shanak, Rabab Jarrar, Jihad Asad . Activation energy impact on unsteady Bio-convection nanomaterial flow over porous surface. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19822-19845. doi: 10.3934/math.20221086 |
[5] | Xingang Zhang, Zhe Liu, Ling Ding, Bo Tang . Global solutions to a nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16115-16126. doi: 10.3934/math.2023822 |
[6] | Sheheryar Shah, M. N. Abrar, Kamran Akhtar, Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad . Entropy formation analysis for magnetized UCM fluid over an exponentially stretching surface with PST and PSHF wall conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11666-11683. doi: 10.3934/math.2023591 |
[7] | Jingen Yang, Zhong Zhao, Xinyu Song . Statistical property analysis for a stochastic chemostat model with degenerate diffusion. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1757-1769. doi: 10.3934/math.2023090 |
[8] | Umar Nazir, Kanit Mukdasai . Combine influence of Hall effects and viscous dissipation on the motion of ethylene glycol conveying alumina, silica and titania nanoparticles using the non-Newtonian Casson model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4682-4699. doi: 10.3934/math.2023231 |
[9] | M. A. El-Shorbagy, Waseem, Mati ur Rahman, Hossam A. Nabwey, Shazia Habib . An artificial neural network analysis of the thermal distribution of a fractional-order radial porous fin influenced by an inclined magnetic field. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13659-13688. doi: 10.3934/math.2024667 |
[10] | Tian Xu, Ailong Wu . Stabilization of nonlinear hybrid stochastic time-delay neural networks with Lévy noise using discrete-time feedback control. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27080-27101. doi: 10.3934/math.20241317 |
The Lévy process [1] is commonly defined by the characteristic function $\exp \left({ - {c_\alpha }{{\left| k \right|}^\alpha }t} \right)$, wherein $\alpha $ denotes the Lévy index, $k$ is the variable in the Fourier space, and ${c_\alpha }$ is a constant. In recent years, Lévy-type behaviors have been widely used to interpret signatures of anomalous thermal transport in low-dimensional systems [2,3,4,5,6,7]. A typical example is the power-law size-dependence of the effective thermal conductivity ${\kappa _{eff}}$ [4,8,9,10,11], namely,
$ {\kappa _{eff}} = {\kappa _{eff}}\left( L \right) \sim {L^\gamma } $ | (1.1) |
with $L$ denoting the system size. Based on the Monte Carlo technique for solving the phonon Boltzmann transport equation, Upadhyaya and Aksamija [5] have observed a Lévy-type (or heavy-tailed) distribution of the phonon mean free paths in Si-Ge alloy nanowires, which gives rise to a divergent exponent $\gamma = {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. } 3}$. Denisov and co-authors [12] connected the size-dependence exponent to the Lévy index $\alpha \in \left({1, 2} \right)$ for one-dimensional dynamical channels, $\gamma = 2 - \alpha $. This relation is supported by a recent investigation on the long-range interacting Fermi-Pasta-Ulam chains [7]. Furthermore, the results in Si-Ge alloy nanowires and one-dimensional dynamical channels also show that the Lévy processes will be paired with another signature of anomalous thermal transport, the superdiffusive growth of the mean-square energy displacement [5],
$ \left\langle {\Delta x_e^2\left( t \right)} \right\rangle \sim {t^\beta } $ | (1.2) |
with $\beta \in \left({1, 2} \right)$. The coexistence of the Lévy-type regimes and superdiffusive thermal transport has also been acquired in semiconductor alloys [6] and two-dimensional nonlinear lattices [8].
There is another conceptual connection between the Lévy processes and anomalous thermal transport in low-dimensional systems, the spatial fractional-order operators [13,14,15]. For instance, the energy perturbation $\delta e\left({x, t} \right)$ in the one-dimensional harmonic chains is commonly governed by a 3/4-fractional diffusion equation [14,15] as follows
$ \frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\left[ {\delta e\left( {x, t} \right)} \right] = - {C_0}{\left( { - \Delta } \right)^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 4}} \right. } 4}}}\left[ {\delta e\left( {x, t} \right)} \right] $ | (1.3) |
wherein ${C_0}$ is a positive constant and ${\left({ - \Delta } \right)^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 4}} \right. } 4}}}$ stands for the fractional Laplacian operator [16,17]. For infinite space like $\mathbb{R}$, ${\left({ - \Delta } \right)^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 4}} \right. } 4}}}$ is generally defined in terms of the Fourier transform, namely,
$ {\mathcal{F}_k}\left\{ {{{\left( { - \Delta } \right)}^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 4}} \right. } 4}}}\left[ {\delta e\left( {x, t} \right)} \right]} \right\} = {\left| k \right|^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. } 2}}}{\mathcal{F}_k}\left\{ {\delta e\left( {x, t} \right)} \right\} $ | (1.4) |
with ${\mathcal{F}_k}\left\{ {...} \right\}$ the Fourier transform operator. At the microscopic level, Eq (1.3) can be obtained from the Boltzmann transport equation with a certain collision term [18,19,20,21,22]. In these studies, the Lévy-type behaviors are observed based on the specific physical regimes of the heat carriers, which differ from model to model, yet generic mathematical descriptions are not much involved with signatures of anomalous thermal transport. In mathematics, spatial fractional-order governing equations are widely applied to the Lévy processes [23,24,25], including the Lévy flights in a confined domain $\left[{0, L} \right]$. The main aim of this work is to address anomalous thermal transport which is dominated the confined Lévy flights, which has not been discussed by previous investigations.
The simplest mathematical description of the confined Lévy flights is the following symmetric Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation [23]
$
∂P(x,t)∂t=−Kα2cos(πα2)[RL0Dαx+RLLDαx]P(x,t)=−Kα2cos(πα2)Γ(2−α)∂2∂x2[∫L0P(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′],
$
|
(1.5) |
where $P\left({x, t} \right)$ denotes the probability density function (PDF), ${K_\alpha }$ is the noise intensity with the dimension ${\left| x \right|^\alpha }{t^{ - 1}}$, ${}_L^{RL}D_x^\alpha $ and ${}_0^{RL}D_x^\alpha $ stand for the right-hand and left-hand Riemann-Liouville operators respectively. For engineering or experimental problems, the boundary points must be attained, which will give rise to infinite Lévy measure. In this work, we apply Eq (1.5) to one-dimensional thermal transport, wherein the PDF is defined in terms of the correlation function of the energy fluctuations [3], namely,
$
\left\{ P(x,t)=[∫L0Cu(x,t=0)dx]−1Cu(x,t)Cu(x,t)=⟨u(x,t)u(x=0,t=0)⟩−⟨u(x,t)⟩⟨u(x=0,t=0)⟩ \right.
$
|
(1.6) |
with $u\left({x, t} \right)$ the density of the thermal energy. Eq (1.5) corresponds to nonlocal thermal transport, namely that the temporal evolution of the energy fluctuations at $x = {x_0}$ depends on the global distribution of the energy fluctuations in $\left[{0, L} \right]$. For arbitrary $\varepsilon \in \left({0, \min \left\{ {{x_0}, L - {x_0}} \right\}} \right)$, the distributions in $\left[{{x_0}- \varepsilon, {x_0}} \right)$ and $\left({{x_0}, {x_0} + \varepsilon } \right]$ have the same contribution to the temporal evolution at $x = {x_0}$, which indicates that the nonlocality is symmetric. Based on the entropic functionals, a connection between the evolution of the PDF and thermal transport is established. Anomalous features of thermal transport thereafter arise from the entropic connection, including the nonlocality of the local effective thermal conductivity, power-law size-dependence of the global effective thermal conductivity, and nonlinear boundary asymptotics of the stationary temperature profile. Thermal transport and confined Lévy flights.
The Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation describes the evolution of the PDF, while thermal transport focuses on thermodynamic quantities, i.e., the heat flux ${J_q}\left({x, t} \right)$ and local temperature $T\left({x, t} \right)$. In order to link the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation to thermal transport, we consider the following entropy density in the framework of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical mechanics,
$ s\left( {x, t} \right) = - {k_B}P\left( {x, t} \right)\ln P\left( {x, t} \right) $ | (2.1) |
where ${k_B}$ is the Boltzmann constant. The temporal derivative of $s\left({x, t} \right)$ should be restricted by the entropy balance equation as follows
$
∂s(x,t)∂t=−kB∂P(x,t)∂t[lnP(x,t)+1]=−∂JS(x,t)∂x+σ(x,t).
$
|
(2.2) |
wherein ${J_S}\left({x, t} \right)$ denotes the entropy flux and $\sigma \left({x, t} \right)$ is the density of the entropy production rate. Besides the entropy balance equation, there is another restriction termed as continuity equation,
$ \frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial t}} = - \frac{{\partial J\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} $ | (2.3) |
where $J\left({x, t} \right)$ is the probability current. Substituting Eq (2.3) into Eq (2.2) yields
$
∂s(x,t)∂t=kB∂J(x,t)∂x[lnP(x,t)+1]=kB∂∂x{J(x,t)[lnP(x,t)+1]}−kBJ(x,t)∂∂x[lnP(x,t)+1]=−∂JS(x,t)∂x+σ(x,t),
$
|
(2.4) |
and we thereafter arrive at
$ {J_S}\left( {x, t} \right) = - {k_B}J\left( {x, t} \right)\left[ {\ln P\left( {x, t} \right) + 1} \right] $ | (2.5) |
$
σ(x,t)=−kBJ(x,t)∂∂x[lnP(x,t)+1]=−kBJ(x,t)P(x,t)∂P(x,t)∂x.
$
|
(2.6) |
Then, $J\left({x, t} \right)$ and $P\left({x, t} \right)$ can be connected to thermal transport via the relationship between $\left\{ {{J_S}\left({x, t} \right), \sigma \left({x, t} \right)} \right\}$ and $\left\{ {{J_q}\left({x, t} \right), T\left({x, t} \right)} \right\}$.
For thermal transport not far from local equilibrium, Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical mechanics typically coincides with classical irreversible thermodynamics [26], which gives the following expressions for the above entropic functionals,
$ s\left( {x, t} \right) = \int_{}^{T\left( {x, t} \right)} {c\frac{{dT}}{T}} + {s_{eq}} $ | (2.7) |
$ {J_S}\left( {x, t} \right) = \frac{1}{{T\left( {x, t} \right)}}{J_q}\left( {x, t} \right) $ | (2.8) |
$ \sigma \left( {x, t} \right) = {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right)\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left[ {\frac{1}{{T\left( {x, t} \right)}}} \right] $ | (2.9) |
where ${s_{eq}}$ is the entropy density independent of thermal transport, and $c$ is the specific heat capacity per volume. Upon combining Eqs (2.8) and (2.9) with Eqs (2.5) and (2.6) respectively, one can derive the relations between $\left\{ {J\left({x, t} \right), P\left({x, t} \right)} \right\}$ and $\left\{ {{J_q}\left({x, t} \right), T\left({x, t} \right)} \right\}$, namely,
$ {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right) = - {k_B}T\left( {x, t} \right)J\left( {x, t} \right)\left[ {\ln P\left( {x, t} \right) + 1} \right] $ | (2.10) |
$ cJ\left( {x, t} \right)\frac{{\partial T\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} = {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right)\frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} $ | (2.11) |
The two relations do not rely on specific constitutive models between $J\left({x, t} \right)$ and $P\left({x, t} \right)$, which remains valid for various generalized Fokker-Planck equations besides the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation.
For the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation, the constitutive model between $J\left({x, t} \right)$ and $P\left({x, t} \right)$ is given by [27]
$ J\left( {x, t} \right) = \frac{{{K_\alpha }}}{{2\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{{P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}dx '}} \right] $ | (2.12) |
and substituting it into Eqs (2.10) and (2.11) leads to
$ {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right) = \frac{{ - {k_B}{K_\alpha }T\left( {x, t} \right)\left[ {\ln P\left( {x, t} \right) + 1} \right]}}{{2\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{{P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}dx '}} \right] $ | (2.13) |
$ \frac{{{K_\alpha }c\frac{{\partial T\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}}}{{2\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{{P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}dx '}} \right] = {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right)\frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} $ | (2.14) |
Equation (2.13) exhibits a nonlocal behavior of the heat flux, namely that the heat flux at ${x_0} \in \left[{0, L} \right]$ depends on not only the PDF and local temperature at ${x_0}$ but also all states in $\left[{0, L} \right]$. In other words, any points in $\left[{0, L} \right]$ will contribute to the heat flux at ${x_0}$. Such nonlocality will vanish in the limit $\alpha \to 2$, which leads to a degeneration into the standard diffusion equation. In this degenerate case, Eq (2.13) becomes
$ {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right) = {K_{\alpha = 2}}{k_B}T\left( {x, t} \right)\frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}\left[ {\ln P\left( {x, t} \right) + 1} \right] $ | (2.15) |
which illustrates that the diffusive heat flux is proportional to the PDF gradient. Note that the gradient of the entropy density is written as
$
∂s(x,t)∂x=−kB∂P(x,t)∂x[lnP(x,t)+1]=cT(x,t)∂T(x,t)∂x.
$
|
(2.16) |
Combining Eqs (2.15) and (2.16) yields
$
Jq(x,t)=−Kα=2T(x,t)∂s(x,t)∂x=−Kα=2c∂T(x,t)∂x.
$
|
(2.17) |
and we now obtain a constitutive relation between ${J_q}\left({x, t} \right)$ and $\frac{{\partial T\left({x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}$. Furthermore, the diffusive limit $\alpha \to 2$ implies normal thermal transport ($\beta = 1$), wherein ${J_q}\left({x, t} \right)$ and $\frac{{\partial T\left({x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}$ generally obey conventional Fourier's law, namely,
$ {J_q}\left( {x, t} \right) = - \kappa \frac{{\partial T\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} $ | (2.18) |
Here, $\kappa $ is the so-called thermal conductivity, which is an intrinsic material property and independent of geometric parameters such as the system size. It is found that Eqs (2.17) and (2.18) will possess a same formulation as if $\kappa \equiv {K_{\alpha = 2}}c$. This degeneration to Fourier's law is physical reasonable and in agreement with existing understandings of anomalous thermal transport [2,3,4]. In the degeneration case, the Lévy process becomes the Gauss process. Meanwhile, Fourier's law corresponding to Eq (2.15) is paired with a parabolic governing equation of the local temperature [3], whose solution for initial thermal perturbation is Gaussian as well. Thus, Eq (2.15) also corresponds to the Gauss case. Nevertheless, $\kappa \equiv {K_{\alpha = 2}}c$ is not unconditionally tenable. As material properties, $\kappa $ and $c$ generally vary as the local temperature changes, whereas ${K_\alpha }$ is assumed to be a constant. Therefore, $\kappa \equiv {K_{\alpha = 2}}c$ is valid only if $\kappa $ and $c$ have a same temperature-dependence. This assumption commonly holds at the low temperature, yet is usually invalid in the high-temperature situations [28,29,30], wherein $\kappa $ decays with the increasing temperature and $c$ vanishingly varies.
For $\alpha \in \left({1, 2} \right)$, Eq (2.14) can still be reformed as a Fourier-like constitutive relation
$
\left\{ Jq(x,t)=−κloceff∂T(x,t)∂xκloceff=−Kαc[∂P(x,t)∂x]−1∂∂x[∫L0P(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′]2cos(πα2)Γ(2−α) \right.
$
|
(2.19) |
Because the prefactor $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ is determined by the all states in $\left[{0, L} \right]$, it cannot be formulated as a functional of the local temperature like $\kappa _{eff}^{loc} = \kappa _{eff}^{loc}\left[{T\left({x, t} \right)} \right]$. It implies that $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ is not a well-defined intrinsic property, and hence, Fourier's law no longer holds. From the viewpoint of physics, $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ can be understood as the local effective thermal conductivity. There are several aspects which need careful discussion. First, the derivation of $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ relies on the framework of classical irreversible thermodynamics, which requires the non-negative entropy production rate in Eq (2.9). This requirement is equivalent to $\kappa _{eff}^{loc} \geqslant 0$, which leads to
$ \frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{{P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}dx '}} \right] \geqslant 0 $ | (2.20) |
Furthermore, as a thermodynamically irreversible process, non-vanishing thermal transport (${J_q}\left({x, t} \right) \ne 0$) must be paired with a strictly positive value of the entropy production rate. Conversely, if the total entropy production rate of a system is zero, this system must be in thermal equilibrium, which indicates that ${J_q}\left({x, t} \right) \equiv 0$ and $\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}} \equiv 0$. In the framework of classical irreversible thermodynamics, the thermodynamic restriction stated above corresponds to the following corollary
$
\left\{ sup0⩽x⩽L|Jq(x,t)|>0⇒∫L0Jq(x,t)∂∂x[1T(x,t)]dx>0∫L0Jq(x,t)∂∂x[1T(x,t)]dx=0⇒Jq(x,t)≡0 \right.
$
|
(2.21) |
As a physically meaningful quantity, the supremum $\mathop {\sup }\limits_{0 \leqslant x \leqslant L} \left| {{J_q}\left({x, t} \right)} \right|$ should be attained. Singular $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ can arise from ${J_q}\left({x, t} \right) \ne 0$ and $\frac{{\partial T\left({x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}} \equiv 0$, which will invalidate corollary (2.21). For the PDF, the above corollary becomes
$
\left\{ sup0⩽x⩽L|∂∂x[∫L0KαP(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′]|>0⇒∫L0∂P(x,t)∂x∂∂x[∫L0KαP(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′]2cos(πα2)Γ(2−α)P(x,t)dx<0∫L0∂P(x,t)∂x∂∂x[∫L0KαP(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′]2cos(πα2)Γ(2−α)P(x,t)dx=0⇒∂∂x[∫L0KαP(x′,t)|x−x′|α−1dx′]≡0 \right.
$
|
(2.22) |
It is demonstrated that not all solutions of Eq (1.5) can coexist with classical irreversible thermodynamics in the near-equilibrium region. The coexistence of the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation and classical irreversible thermodynamics relies on restrictions (2.20) and (2.22), which correspond to $0 \leqslant \kappa _{eff}^{loc} < + \infty $.
According to the result in [23], the equilibrium solution of the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation is given by
$ {P_{eq}}\left( x \right) = \frac{{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right){L^{1 - \alpha }}{{\left[ {x\left( {L - x} \right)} \right]}^{{{\left( {\alpha - 2} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {\alpha - 2} \right)} 2}} \right. } 2}}}}}{{{\Gamma ^2}\left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. } 2}} \right)}} $ | (2.23) |
Non-uniform ${P_{eq}}\left(x \right)$ will give rise to a non-uniform temperature distribution, namely,
$
ds(x)dx|Jq≡0=cT(x)|Jq(x,t)≡0d[T(x)|Jq(x,t)≡0]dx=−kBdPeq(x)dx[lnPeq(x)+1]⇒d[T(x)|Jq(x,t)≡0,x≠L/L22]dx≠0.
$
|
(2.24) |
From a physical perspective, it is non-trivial that the non-vanishing temperature gradient coexists with the thermal equilibrium state, which means absolute thermal insulation, $\kappa _{eff}^{loc} \equiv 0$. Furthermore, ${P_{eq}}\left(x \right)$ is singular at the boundary, which will induces infinite boundary temperatures. These non-trivial behaviors have not been observed in existing studies on anomalous thermal transport [2,3,4].
If the temperature distribution is uniform in the absence of thermal transport, the equilibrium PDF should be written as
$ {\left. {P\left( x \right)} \right|_{J\left( {x, t} \right) \equiv 0}} = {L^{ - 1}} $ | (3.1) |
For the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation, this equilibrium solution can be acquired via replacing the Riemann-Liouville operator by the Caputo operator [31], and the constitutive relation between $J\left({x, t} \right)$ and $P\left({x, t} \right)$ thereafter becomes
$ J\left( {x, t} \right) = \frac{{{K_\alpha }}}{{2\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{1}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}\frac{{\partial P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{\partial x'}}dx '}} \right] $ | (3.2) |
The corresponding local effective thermal conductivity reads
$ \kappa _{eff}^{loc} = - \frac{{{K_\alpha }c{{\left[ {\frac{{\partial P\left( {x, t} \right)}}{{\partial x}}} \right]}^{ - 1}}\left[ {\int_0^L {\frac{1}{{{{\left| {x - x'} \right|}^{\alpha - 1}}}}\frac{{\partial P\left( {x', t} \right)}}{{\partial x'}}dx '}} \right]}}{{2\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)}} $ | (3.3) |
which is still nonlocal. The thermodynamic restrictions for $\left\{ {{J_q}\left({x, t} \right), T\left({x, t} \right)} \right\}$ remain unchanged, and the restrictions on the PDF take the following forms
$
\left\{ ∂P(x,t)∂x[∫L01|x−x′|α−1∂P(x′,t)∂x′dx′]⩾0sup0⩽x⩽L|∫L0Kα|x−x′|α−1∂P(x′,t)∂x′dx′|>0⇒∫L0∫L0[Kα∂P(x,t)∂x∂P(x′,t)∂x′|x−x′|α−1]dx′dx<0∫L0∫L0[Kα∂P(x,t)∂x∂P(x′,t)∂x′|x−x′|α−1]dx′dx=0⇒[∫L0Kα|x−x′|α−1∂P(x′,t)∂x′dx′]≡0 \right.
$
|
(3.4) |
which are equivalent to $0 \leqslant \kappa _{eff}^{loc} < + \infty $ likewise.
We now consider stationary thermal transport in the presence of a small temperature difference, namely,
$\left| {\delta T} \right| \ll \min \left\{ {T\left( {x = L} \right), T\left( {x = 0} \right)} \right\}$, $\delta T = T\left( {x = L} \right) - T\left( {x = 0} \right)$ | (3.5) |
which yields
$\left| {\delta P} \right| \ll \min \left\{ {P\left( {x = L} \right), P\left( {x = 0} \right)} \right\}$, $\delta P = P\left( {x = L} \right) - P\left( {x = 0} \right)$ | (3.6) |
In this case, the solution of the modified Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation is written as
$P\left( x \right) = P\left( {x = 0} \right) + \frac{{\left\{ {\int_0^x {{{\left[ {y\left( {L - y} \right)} \right]}^{\frac{\alpha }{2} - 1}}dy} } \right\}\delta P}}{{\int_0^L {{{\left[ {y\left( {L - y} \right)} \right]}^{\frac{\alpha }{2} - 1}}dy} }}$ | (3.7) |
Preconditions (3.5) and (3.6) enable us to employ the following expansion
$
δs=s(x=L)−s(x=0)=c0T0[δT+o(δT)]=−kB[δP(lnP0+1)+o(δP)],
$
|
(3.8) |
where ${c_0}$ is the specific heat capacity at ${T_0}$, ${T_0}$ and ${P_0}$ are the averaged temperature and probability density respectively. With the remainder term neglected, we arrive at
$\delta T \approx - \frac{{{k_B}{T_0}}}{{{c_0}}}\delta P\left( {\ln {P_0} + 1} \right)$ | (3.9) |
Similarly, the entropy flux can be expanded as
$
JS=Jq[1T0+o(δT)T20]=−πkBKα[lnP0+1+o(δP)]δPcos(πα2)sin(πα2)Γ(α)Lα−1{∫10[z(1−z)]α2−1dz}.
$
|
(3.10) |
From Eq (3.10), one can derive the following expression of the heat flux
$ {J_q} \approx - \frac{{\pi {k_B}{T_0}{K_\alpha }\left( {\ln {P_0} + 1} \right)\delta P}}{{\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( \alpha \right){L^{\alpha - 1}}\left\{ {\int_0^1 {{{\left[ {z\left( {1 - z} \right)} \right]}^{\frac{\alpha }{2} - 1}}dz} } \right\}}} $ | (3.11) |
Stationary thermal transport is typically characterized by the global effective thermal conductivity as follows [2,3,4],
$ \kappa _{eff}^{glo} = - \frac{{{J_q}L}}{{\delta T}} $ | (3.12) |
which can be obtained through combining Eqs (3.9) and (3.11), namely,
$ \kappa _{eff}^{glo} = - \frac{{\pi {K_\alpha }{c_0}{L^{2 - \alpha }}}}{{\cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \alpha }}{2}} \right)\Gamma \left( \alpha \right)\int_0^1 {{{\left[ {y\left( {1 - y} \right)} \right]}^{\frac{\alpha }{2} - 1}}dy} }} $ | (3.13) |
The power-law size-dependence of the effective thermal conductivity presently occurs, while the size-dependence exponent is $\gamma = 2 - \alpha $. This relation between $\gamma $ and $\alpha $ formally coincides with Ref. [12], but it is derived from the confined Lévy flight rather than the Lévy walk model. In existing numerical and experimental investigations [2,3,4], the range of the size-dependence exponent is observed as $\gamma \leqslant 1$. This range will not allow the case of $0 < \alpha < 1$, that is why the Lévy exponent is restricted as $1 < \alpha < 2$.
In the following, the local effective thermal conductivity will be discussed. Since ${J_q}$ is already known, we only need to consider the expression of $\frac{{dT\left(x \right)}}{{dx}}$, which can be acquired from the following expansion
$
ds(x)dx=c0[1T0+o(δT)T20]dT(x)dx=−kB[lnP0+1+o(δP)]dP(x)dx⇒dT(x)dx≈−kBT0(lnP0+1)[x(L−x)]α2−1δPc0{∫L0[y(L−y)]α2−1dy}.
$
|
(3.14) |
The local effective thermal conductivity is subsequently presented as follows
$
κloceff=−[dT(x)dx]−1Jq=πKαc0[x(L−x)]1−α2cos(πα2)sin(πα2)Γ(α).
$
|
(3.15) |
which depends on not only the system size but also the location. Eq (3.14) also exhibits another signature of anomalous thermal transport, the nonlinear boundary asymptotics of the stationary temperature profile [4], namely,
$
\left\{ limx→0+|T(x)−T(x=0)|∼xα2limx→L−|T(x=L)−T(x)|∼(L−x)α2 \right.
$
|
(3.16) |
In the diffusive limit $\alpha \to 2$, $\kappa _{eff}^{loc}$ will be independent of the system size and location, and meanwhile, the asymptotic exponent $\chi = {\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. } 2}$ becomes linear. All of these degenerate behaviors agree with Fourier's law, which is physically reasonable. It should be underlined that the expanding approach stated above is inapplicable to the standard Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation based on the Riemann-Liouville operator. That is because the assumption of sufficiently small temperature difference ($\delta T \ll {T_0}$) is invalid for the Riemann-Liouville operator.
The symmetric Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation is applied to investigating anomalous thermal transport in a one-dimensional confined domain. Based on the frameworks of classical irreversible thermodynamics and Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical mechanics, we establish a connection between the evolution of the probability density function and thermal transport dominated by the confined Lévy flights. The expression of the local effective thermal conductivity is derived as a nonlocal formula, which depends on all states in the domain. The thermal transport process therefore becomes anomalous. It is demonstrated that the diffusive limit $\alpha \to 2$ will lead to the degeneration into conventional Fourier's law of heat conduction as if the thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity possess the same temperature-dependence. The thermodynamic connection between the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation and anomalous thermal transport relies on the near-equilibrium assumption, which needs certain physical restrictions on the evolution of the probability density function. It is found that the Riemann-Liouville operator will be paired with thermodynamically non-trivial behaviors, namely that the equilibrium state corresponds to the non-uniform temperature distribution and infinite boundary temperature. In order to avoid the non-uniform equilibrium state, the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation is modified in terms of the Caputo operator. It is shown that the modified Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation will give rise to two signatures of anomalous thermal transport, the power-law size-dependence of the global effective thermal conductivity and nonlinear boundary asymptotics of the stationary temperature profile. The results illustrate that the anomalies of Lévy-based thermal transport are not independent of each other, and should fulfill certain quantitative relations. For instance, the size-dependence exponent of the global effective thermal conductivity and asymptotic exponent of the stationary temperature profile are constrained by $\gamma = 2 - 2\chi $. The quantitative relations can be used to test whether a specific thermal transport process is dominated by the confined Lévy flights.
We are extremely grateful for Pei-Ming Xu and Shu-Jie Zhang for fruitful comment. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51825601, U20A2031).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Gendelman HE, Mosley RL, Boska MD, et al. (2014) The promise of nanoneuromedicine. Nanomedicine (London, U.K.) 9: 171–176. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.17
![]() |
[2] |
Hu YL, Gao JQ (2010) Potential neurotoxicity of nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 394: 115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.04.026
![]() |
[3] |
Yang Z, Liu ZW, Allaker RP, et al. (2010) A review of nanoparticle functionality and toxicity on the central nervous system. J R Soc Interface 7: S411–S422. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0158.focus
![]() |
[4] |
Win-Shwe TT, Fujimaki H (2011) Nanoparticles and neurotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci 12: 6267–6280. doi: 10.3390/ijms12096267
![]() |
[5] |
Karmakar A, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2014) Neurotoxicity of nanoscale materials. J Food Drug Anal 22: 147–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.012
![]() |
[6] | Feng X, Chen A, Zhang Y, et al. (2015) Central nervous system toxicity of metallic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 10: 4321–4340. |
[7] | Larner SF, Wang J, Goodman J, et al. (2017) In Vitro Neurotoxicity Resulting from Exposure of Cultured Neural Cells to Several Types of Nanoparticles. J Cell Death 10: 1179670717694523. |
[8] |
Ariano P, Zamburlin P, Gilardino A, et al. (2011) Interaction of spherical silica nanoparticles with neuronal cells: size-dependent toxicity and perturbation of calcium homeostasis. Small 7: 766–774. doi: 10.1002/smll.201002287
![]() |
[9] |
Podila R, Brown JM (2013) Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a physicochemical perspective. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27: 50–55. doi: 10.1002/jbt.21442
![]() |
[10] |
Dante S, Petrelli A, Petrini EM, et al. (2017) Selective Targeting of Neurons with Inorganic Nanoparticles: Revealing the Crucial Role of Nanoparticle Surface Charge. ACS Nano 11: 6630–6640. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00397
![]() |
[11] |
Xu F, Piett C, Farkas S, et al. (2013) Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) cause degeneration of cytoskeleton and disrupt synaptic machinery of cultured cortical neurons. Mol Brain 6: 29. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-6-29
![]() |
[12] | Skalska J, Strużyńska L (2015) Toxic effects of silver nanoparticles in mammals – does a risk of neurotoxicity exist? Folia Neuropathol 53: 281–300. |
[13] | Cupaioli FA, Zucca FA, Boraschi D, et al. (2014) Engineered nanoparticles. How brain friendly is this new guest? Prog Neurobiol 119–120: 20–38. |
[14] |
Skalska J, Frontczak-Baniewicz M, Strużyńska L (2015) Synaptic degeneration in rat brain after prolonged oral exposure to silver nanoparticles. Neurotoxicology 46: 145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.11.002
![]() |
[15] | Wu T, He K, Ang S, et al. (2016) Impairments of spatial learning and memory following intrahippocampal injection in rats of 3-mercaptopropionic acid-modified CdTe quantum dots and molecular mechanisms. Int J Nanomedicine 11: 2737–2755. |
[16] | Ema M, Okuda H, Gamo M, et al. (2107) A review of reproductive and developmental toxicity of silver nanoparticles in laboratory animals. Reprod Toxicol 67: 149–164. |
[17] |
Wang Y, Xiong L, Tang M (2017) Toxicity of inhaled particulate matter on the central nervous system: neuroinflammation, neuropsychological effects and neurodegenerative disease. J Appl Toxicol 37: 644–667. doi: 10.1002/jat.3451
![]() |
[18] |
Wang J, Rahman MF, Duhart HM, et al. (2009) Expression changes of dopaminergic system-related genes in PC12 cells induced by manganese, silver, or copper nanoparticles. Neurotoxicology 30: 926–933. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.09.005
![]() |
[19] | Umezawa M, Tainaka H, Kawashima N, et al. (2102) Effect of fetal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticle on brain development - brain region information. J Toxicol Sci 37: 1247–1252. |
[20] |
Migliore L, Uboldi C, Di Bucchianico S, et al. (2015) Nanomaterials and neurodegeneration. Environ Mol Mutagen 56: 149–170. doi: 10.1002/em.21931
![]() |
[21] |
Stoccoro A, Karlsson HL, Coppede` F, et al. (2013) Epigenetic effects of nano-sized materials. Toxicology 313: 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.12.002
![]() |
[22] |
Soenen SJ, Rivera-Gil P, Montenegro JM, et al. (2011) Cellular toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles: Common aspects and guidelines for improved nanotoxicity evaluation. Nano Today 6: 446–465. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001
![]() |
[23] |
Trickler WJ, Lantz SM, Murdock RC, et al. (2010) Silver nanoparticle induced blood-brain barrier inflammation and increased permeability in primary rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicol Sci 118: 160–170. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq244
![]() |
[24] |
Oberdörster G, Elder A, Rinderknecht A (2009) Nanoparticles and the brain: cause for concern? J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9: 4996–5007. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2009.GR02
![]() |
[25] |
Valdiglesias V, Kiliç G, Costa C, et al. (2015) Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and neurotoxicity. Environ Mol Mutagen 56: 125–148. doi: 10.1002/em.21909
![]() |
[26] |
Song B, Zhang Y, Liu J, et al. (2016) Is Neurotoxicity of Metallic Nanoparticles the Cascades of Oxidative Stress? Nanoscale Res Lett 11: 291. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1508-4
![]() |
[27] |
Wang J, Deng X, Zhang F, et al. (2014) ZnO nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress triggers apoptosis by activating JNK signaling pathway in cultured primary astrocytes. Nanoscale Res Lett 9: 117. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-117
![]() |
[28] |
Marano F, Hussain S, Rodrigues-Lima F, et al. (2011) Nanoparticles: molecular targets and cell signalling. Arch Toxicol 85: 733–741. doi: 10.1007/s00204-010-0546-4
![]() |
[29] |
Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, et al. (2008) Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 14265–14270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805135105
![]() |
[30] |
Hellstrand E, Lynch I, Andersson A, et al. (2009) Complete high-density lipoproteins in nanoparticle corona. FEBS J 276: 3372–3381. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07062.x
![]() |
[31] |
Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 134-135: 167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.04.021
![]() |
[32] |
Gromnicova R, Yilmaz CU, Orhan N, et al. (2016) Localization and mobility of glucose-coated gold nanoparticles within the brain. Nanomedicine (London, U.K.) 11: 617–625. doi: 10.2217/nnm.15.215
![]() |
[33] |
Xie H, Wu J (2016) Silica nanoparticles induce alpha-synuclein induction and aggregation in PC12-cells. Chem Biol Interact 258: 197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.09.006
![]() |
[34] |
Corazzari I, Gilardino A, Dalmazzo S, et al. (2013) Localization of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in the lysosomal acidic compartment of cultured neurons and its impact on viability: potential role of ion release. Toxicol In Vitro 27: 752–759. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.12.016
![]() |
[35] |
Erriquez J, Bolis V, Morel S, et al. (2015) Nanosized TiO2 is internalized by dorsal root ganglion cells and causes damage via apoptosis. Nanomedicine 11: 1309–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.04.003
![]() |
[36] |
Huefner A, Kuan WL, Müller KH, et al. (2016) Characterization and Visualization of Vesicles in the Endo-Lysosomal Pathway with Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Chemometrics. ACS Nano 10: 307–316. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04456
![]() |
[37] |
Petters C, Thiel K, Dringen R (2016) Lysosomal iron liberation is responsible for the vulnerability of brain microglial cells to iron oxide nanoparticles: comparison with neurons and astrocytes. Nanotoxicology 10: 332–342. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1071445
![]() |
[38] |
Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, et al. (2008) Cationic polystyrene nanosphere toxicity depends on cell-specific endocytic and mitochondrial injury pathways. ACS Nano 2: 85–96. doi: 10.1021/nn700256c
![]() |
[39] |
Long TC, Saleh N, Tilton RD, et al. (2006) Titanium dioxide (P25) produces reactive oxygen species in immortalized brain microglia (BV2): implications for nanoparticle neurotoxicity. Environ Sci Technol 40: 4346–4352. doi: 10.1021/es060589n
![]() |
[40] |
Huerta-Garcia E, Perez-Arizti JA, Marquez-Ramirez SG, et al. (2014) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce strong oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in glial cells. Free Radical Biol Med 73: 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.04.026
![]() |
[41] |
Wang J, Sun P, Bao Y, et al. (2011) Cytotoxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes on PC12 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 25: 242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.010
![]() |
[42] |
Wang J, Sun P, Bao Y, et al. (2012) Vitamin E renders protection to PC12 cells against oxidative damage and apoptosis induced by single-walled carbon nanotubes. Toxicol In Vitro 26: 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.10.004
![]() |
[43] | Sheng L, Ze Y, Wang L, et al. (2015) Mechanisms of TiO2 nanoparticle-induced neuronal apoptosis in rat primary cultured hippocampal neurons. J Biomed Mater Res A 103: 1141–1149. |
[44] | Wilson CL, Natarajan V, Hayward SL, et al. (2105) Mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of glutamate uptake in primary astrocytes exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 7: 18477–18488. |
[45] |
Zieminska E, Stafiej A, Struzynska L (2014) The role of the glutamatergic NMDA receptor in nanosilver-evoked neurotoxicity in primary cultures of cerebellar granule cells. Toxicology 315: 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.11.008
![]() |
[46] |
Coccini T, Grandi S, Lonati D, et al. (2015) Comparative cellular toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on human astrocyte and neuronal cells after acute and prolonged exposure. Neurotoxicology 48: 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.03.006
![]() |
[47] |
Costa CS., Ronconi JV, Daufenbach JF, et al. (2010). In vitro effects of silver nanoparticles on the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Mol Cell Biochem 342: 51–56. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0467-9
![]() |
[48] |
Pisanic TR 2nd, Blackwell JD, Shubayev VI, et al. (2007) Nanotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticle internalization in growing neurons. Biomaterials 28: 2572–2581. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.043
![]() |
[49] |
Prabhu BM, Ali SF, Murdock RC, et al. (2010) Copper nanoparticles exert size and concentration dependent toxicity on somatosensory neurons of rat. Nanotoxicology 4: 150–160. doi: 10.3109/17435390903337693
![]() |
[50] |
Hong F, Sheng L, Ze Y, et al. (2015) Suppression of neurite outgrowth of primary cultured hippocampal neurons is involved in impairment of glutamate metabolism and NMDA receptor function caused by nanoparticulate TiO2. Biomaterials 53: 76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.067
![]() |
[51] |
Wang F, Jiao C, Liu J, et al. (2011) Oxidative mechanisms contribute to nanosize silican dioxide-induced developmental neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 25: 1548–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.019
![]() |
[52] | Kang Y, Liu J, Song B, et al. (2106) Potential Links between Cytoskeletal Disturbances and Electroneurophysiological Dysfunctions Induced in the Central Nervous System by Inorganic Nanoparticles. Cell Physiol Biochem 40: 1487–1505. |
[53] |
Etem EO, Bal R, Akagac AE, et al. (2014) The effects of hydrated C(60) fullerene on gene expression profile of TRPM2 and TRPM7 in hyperhomocysteinemic mice. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 34: 317–324. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2014.896381
![]() |
[54] | Colombo E, Feyen P, Antognazza MR, et al. (2016) Nanoparticles: A Challenging Vehicle for Neural Stimulation. Front Neurosci 10: 105. |
[55] |
Kumari M, Rajak S, Singh SP, et al. (2012) Repeated oral dose toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles: biochemical and histopathological alterations in different tissues of rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12: 2149–2159. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2012.5796
![]() |
[56] | Guo D, Bi H, Wang D, et al. (2103) Zinc oxide nanoparticles decrease the expression and activity of plasma membrane calcium ATPase, disrupt the intracellular calcium homeostasis in rat retinal ganglion cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45: 1849–1859. |
[57] |
Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, et al. (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391: 85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997
![]() |
[58] |
Zhao J, Xu L, Zhang T, et al. (2009) Influences of nanoparticle zinc oxide on acutely isolated rat hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Neurotoxicology 30: 220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.12.005
![]() |
[59] |
Tang M, Xing T, Zeng J, et al. (2008) Unmodified CdSe quantum dots induce elevation of cytoplasmic calcium levels and impairment of functional properties of sodium channels in rat primary cultured hippocampal neurons. Environ Health Perspect 116: 915–922. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11225
![]() |
[60] |
Liu Z, Ren G, Zhang T, et al. (2009) Action potential changes associated with the inhibitory effects on voltage gated sodium current of hippocampal CA1 neurons by silver nanoparticles. Toxicology 264: 179–184. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.005
![]() |
[61] |
Liu Z, Liu S, Ren G, et al. (2011) Nano-CuO inhibited voltage-gated sodium current of hippocampal CA1 neurons via reactive oxygen species but independent from G-proteins pathway. J Appl Toxicol 31: 439–445. doi: 10.1002/jat.1611
![]() |
[62] | Busse M, Kraegeloh A, Stevens D, et al. (2010) Modeling the effects of nanoparticles on neuronal cells: from ionic channels to network dynamics. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc: 3816–3819. |
[63] |
Liu Z, Ren G, Zhang T, et al. (2011) The inhibitory effects of nano-Ag on voltage-gated potassium currents of hippocampal CA1 neurons. Environ Toxicol 26: 552–558. doi: 10.1002/tox.20586
![]() |
[64] |
Shan D, Xie Y, Ren G, et al. (2012) Inhibitory effect of tungsten carbide nanoparticles on voltage-gated potassium currents of hippocampal CA1 neurons. Toxicol Lett 209: 129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.12.001
![]() |
[65] |
Xu LJ, Zhao JX, Zhang T, et al. (2009) In vitro study on influence of nano particles of CuO on CA1 pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus potassium currents. Environ Toxicol 24: 211–217. doi: 10.1002/tox.20418
![]() |
[66] |
Salinas K, Kereselidze Z, DeLuna F, et al. (2014) Transient extracellular application of gold nanostars increases hippocampal neuronal activity. J Nanobiotechnol 12: 31. doi: 10.1186/s12951-014-0031-y
![]() |
[67] |
Xu H, Bai J, Meng J, et al. (2009) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes suppress potassium channel activities in PC12 cells. Nanotechnology 20: 285102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/28/285102
![]() |
[68] |
Gavello D, Vandael DH, Cesa R, et al. (2012) Altered excitability of cultured chromaffin cells following exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotoxicology 6: 47–60. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2011.553294
![]() |
[69] |
Gleichmann M, Mattson MP (2011) Neuronal calcium homeostasis and dysregulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 14: 1261–1273. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3386
![]() |
[70] |
Lovisolo D, Gilardino A, Ruffinatti FA (2014) When neurons encounter nanoobjects: spotlight on calcium signalling. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11: 9621–9637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909621
![]() |
[71] |
Tang M, Wang M, Xing T, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of unmodified CdSe quantum dot-induced elevation of cytoplasmic calcium levels in primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. Biomaterials 29: 4383–4391. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.001
![]() |
[72] |
Jakubek LM, Marangoudakis S, Raingo J, et al. (2009) The inhibition of neuronal calcium ion channels by trace levels of yttrium released from carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials 30: 6351–6357. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.009
![]() |
[73] |
Liu Z, Zhang T, Ren G, et al. (2012) Nano-Ag inhibiting action potential independent glutamatergic synaptic transmission but increasing excitability in rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nanotoxicology 6: 414–423. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2011.583996
![]() |
[74] |
Gilardino A, Catalano F, Ruffinatti FA, et al. (2015) Interaction of SiO2 nanoparticles with neuronal cells: Ionic mechanisms involved in the perturbation of calcium homeostasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 66: 101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.07.012
![]() |
[75] |
Wei H, Deng F, Chen Y, et al. (2014) Ultrafine carbon black induces glutamate and ATP release by activating connexin and pannexin hemichannels in cultured astrocytes. Toxicology 323: 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.06.005
![]() |
[76] |
Clapham DE (2007) Calcium signaling. Cell 131: 1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028
![]() |
[77] |
Patel R, Sesti F (2016) Oxidation of ion channels in the aging nervous system. Brain Res 1639: 174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.046
![]() |
[78] |
Haase A, Rott S, Mantion A, et al. (2012) Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary mixed neural cell cultures: Uptake, oxidative stress and acute calcium responses. Toxicol Sci 126: 457–468. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs003
![]() |
[79] |
Tang M, Li Z, Chen L, et al. (2009) The effect of quantum dots on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the hippocampal dentate gyrus area of anesthetized rats. Biomaterials 30: 4948–4955. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.012
![]() |
[80] |
Gramowski A, Flossdorf J, Bhattacharya K, et al. (2010) Nanoparticles induce changes of the electrical activity of neuronal networks on microelectrode array neurochips. Environ Health Perspect 118: 1363–1369. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901661
![]() |
[81] |
Gao X, Yin S, Tang M, et al. (2011) Effects of developmental exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles on synaptic plasticity in hippocampal dentate gyrus area: an in vivo study in anesthetized rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 143: 1616–1628. doi: 10.1007/s12011-011-8990-4
![]() |
[82] |
Jung S, Bang M, Kim BS, et al. (2014) Intracellular gold nanoparticles increase neuronal excitability and aggravate seizure activity in the mouse brain. PLoS One 9: e91360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091360
![]() |
1. | Viacheslav V. Saenko, Vladislav N. Kovalnogov, Ruslan V. Fedorov, Yuri E. Chamchiyan, Numerical Solution to Anomalous Diffusion Equations for Levy Walks, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 3219, 10.3390/math9243219 | |
2. | Viacheslav V. Saenko, Vladislav N. Kovalnogov, Ruslan V. Fedorov, Dmitry A. Generalov, Ekaterina V. Tsvetova, Numerical Method for Solving of the Anomalous Diffusion Equation Based on a Local Estimate of the Monte Carlo Method, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 511, 10.3390/math10030511 | |
3. | Vladislav N. Kovalnogov, Tamara V. Karpukhina, Yuri E. Chamchiyan, 2024, 3030, 0094-243X, 110002, 10.1063/5.0193210 |