Mini review Special Issues

Iron-containing clay and hematite iron ore in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure

  • It is shown in this review that addition of clay minerals and hematite iron ore can significantly enhance anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Liquid-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure consumes a lot of fresh water and energy to keep waste as a suspension. Meanwhile, anaerobic digestion of chicken manure in clay slurry without stirring could minimize energy and water consumption because the initial acceptable content of organic solids can be increased. For example, this content can be increased from 5% (w v-1) in suspension of chicken manure for liquidphase anaerobic digestion up to 15% (w v-1) in the slurry of chicken manure for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion than can save up to 13.3 L of water per kilogram of dry organic solids. The slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-, sulphur-, and fat-containing organic wastes can be enhanced using microbial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay or in hematite iron ore. This is due to adsorption or precipitation of such inhibitors of microbial acidogenesis and methanogenesis as ammonium, sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, humic and fulvic acids with clay or ferrous ions. For example, maximum concentration of ammonium decreased from 11.4 g L-1 during liquid-phase anaerobic digestion to 1.4 g L-1 during slurry-phase process due to adsorption of ammonium ions on clay. Addition of iron-containing clay to slurry-phase anaerobic reactor removed dissolved sulphide totally due to its precipitation with ferrous ions that are produced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay. Slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced with bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) minerals is also more effective process in terms of environmental safety than widely used liquid-phase anaerobic digestion because of an absence of water supply and wastewater effluent.

    Citation: Volodymyr Ivanov, Viktor Stabnikov, Olena Stabnikova, Anatoliy Salyuk, Evhenii Shapovalov, Zubair Ahmed, Joo Hwa Tay. Iron-containing clay and hematite iron ore in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(5): 821-832. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.821

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jawad Ahmad, Osama Zaid, Muhammad Shahzaib, Muhammad Usman Abdullah, Asmat Ullah, Rahat Ullah . Mechanical properties of sustainable concrete modified by adding marble slurry as cement substitution. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 343-358. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021022
    [2] Falah Mustafa Al-Saraireh . Cold-curing mixtures based on biopolymer lignin complex for casting production in single and small-series conditions. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 876-890. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023047
    [3] Felipe Bastos, Adeildo Cabral, Perboyre Alcântara, Lino Maia . Study case about the production of masonry concrete blocks with CDW and kaolin mining waste. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(6): 990-1004. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021060
    [4] Witsanu Loetchantharangkun, Ubolrat Wangrakdiskul . Combination of rice husk ash, bagasse ash, and calcium carbonate for developing unglazed fired clay tile. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 434-452. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021027
    [5] Laila H. Abdel-Rahman, Ahmed M. Abu-Dief, Badriah Saad Al-Farhan, Doaa Yousef, Mohamed E. A. El-Sayed . Kinetic study of humic acid adsorption onto smectite: The role of individual and blend background electrolyte. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1176-1190. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1176
    [6] Krzysztof Gargul . Ammonia leaching of slag from direct-to-blister copper smelting technology. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 565-580. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.565
    [7] Denise Arrozarena Portilla, Arturo A. Velázquez López, Rosalva Mora Escobedo, Hernani Yee Madeira . Citrate coated iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and performance in protein adsorption. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 991-1012. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024047
    [8] Natthakitta Piyarat, Ubolrat Wangrakdiskul, Purinut Maingam . Investigations of the influence of various industrial waste materials containing rice husk ash, waste glass, and sediment soil for eco-friendly production of non-fired tiles. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 469-485. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021029
    [9] Rakesh Kumar . Aluminium/iron reinforced polyfurfuryl alcohol resin as advanced biocomposites. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 908-915. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.908
    [10] Aleksander Panichkin, Alma Uskenbayeva, Aidar Kenzhegulov, Axaule Mamaeva, Akerke Imbarova, Balzhan Kshibekova, Zhassulan Alibekov, Didik Nurhadiyanto, Isti Yunita . Assessment of the effect of small additions of some rare earth elements on the structure and mechanical properties of castings from hypereutectic chromium white irons. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(3): 517-540. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023029
  • It is shown in this review that addition of clay minerals and hematite iron ore can significantly enhance anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Liquid-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure consumes a lot of fresh water and energy to keep waste as a suspension. Meanwhile, anaerobic digestion of chicken manure in clay slurry without stirring could minimize energy and water consumption because the initial acceptable content of organic solids can be increased. For example, this content can be increased from 5% (w v-1) in suspension of chicken manure for liquidphase anaerobic digestion up to 15% (w v-1) in the slurry of chicken manure for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion than can save up to 13.3 L of water per kilogram of dry organic solids. The slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-, sulphur-, and fat-containing organic wastes can be enhanced using microbial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay or in hematite iron ore. This is due to adsorption or precipitation of such inhibitors of microbial acidogenesis and methanogenesis as ammonium, sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, humic and fulvic acids with clay or ferrous ions. For example, maximum concentration of ammonium decreased from 11.4 g L-1 during liquid-phase anaerobic digestion to 1.4 g L-1 during slurry-phase process due to adsorption of ammonium ions on clay. Addition of iron-containing clay to slurry-phase anaerobic reactor removed dissolved sulphide totally due to its precipitation with ferrous ions that are produced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay. Slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced with bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) minerals is also more effective process in terms of environmental safety than widely used liquid-phase anaerobic digestion because of an absence of water supply and wastewater effluent.


    Anaerobic digestion of the nitrogen-rich organic wastes such as chicken or pig manure is usually performed in practice as either solid-phase process with the content of solids about 60% (w v-1) [1] or liquid-phase process with the optimum content of solids about 5% (w v-1) [2]. The solid-phase process could be unstable because of not even distribution of the concentrations in the bulk of the matter, diffusion-limited mass exchange and production of process inhibitors due to the high content of organic waste, and potential penetration of oxygen into the porous solid matter [1,3,4]. The liquid-phase process, which is dominating among the practical commercial applications, requires a lot of fresh water to suspend organic waste and energy for liquid waste stirring. Additional technical problem of the liquid-phase anaerobic digestion is mechanical stirring or gas mixing in anaerobic digester, which are both complicated by instable pseudoplastic rheology of suspended organic waste [5]. Efficient liquid-phase anaerobic digesters including expanded granular sludge bed reactor, continuously stirred tank reactor, or sequencing batch reactor ensure high organic loading rates [6], but require a lot of water and energy. Therefore, it could be important to find new water- and energy-saving technology of anaerobic digestion of organic wastes in addition to the existing and widely using technologies.

    The aim of this review was to find new effective ways for anaerobic digestion of organic waste to avoid problems of solid-phase and liquid-phase processes. The objectives of the review were related to enhancement of one type of organic waste, exactly to anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. These objectives were as follows: 1) determination of the parameters of slurry-phase process; 2) diminishing of the inhibiting effect of ammonium on anaerobic digestion using iron-containing clay; 3) evaluation of addition of iron-containing clay and/or iron ore for elimination of the inhibiting effects of sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, and humic acids on biogas production during anaerobic digestion of chicken manure.

    A priori, wet organic waste can be mixed with clay producing slurry that could be digested without stirring in the simple underground construction. A soil or clay slurry usually contains up to 30-40% (w v-1) of solids [7]. A slurry-phase anaerobic digestion ensures strictly anaerobic conditions due to oxygen consumption in the upper layer of slurry. There will be consumption of energy only for the mixing of waste and clay and no consumption of water in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion. Therefore, it is water-saving and low-cost biotechnology for utilization of organic wastes, for example chicken, pig, or cow manure, organic wastes of slaughterhouse, meat- or fish-processing plants.

    For example, quantity of fresh water for the dilution of chicken manure from 15% to 5% (w v-1) of organic solids before liquid-phase anaerobic digestion is 2 L of water L-1 of chicken manure or 13.3 L of water kg-1 of dry organic solids. This is the saving of water for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure in comparison with liquid-phase process. Additionally, there will be no wastewater effluent after slurry-phase anaerobic digestion because clay slurry could be used for the improvement of the texture of the sandy soil in arid area. So, saving of water and use of clay slurry after anaerobic digestion for sandy soil improvement could be especially beneficial for arid areas in developing countries [8]. Clay slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure could be a low-cost treatment. It is known that cost of aerobic slurry-phase soil bioremediation is from $130 to $200 per cubic meter [7], so the cost of anaerobic clay slurry-phase treatment could be several times lower, approximately $20-30 per cubic meter, because there will be no need in aeration and average cost of clay is just about $75 per metric ton.

    Technological comparison of liquid-phase and slurry-phase anaerobic digestions is shown in Table 1. Clay slurry-phase anaerobic digestion has a lot of other technological advantages over liquid-phase digestion that are described and analyzed below.

    Table 1.  Comparison of liquid-phase and slurry-phase anaerobic digestions of chicken manure.
    Process characterization Liquid-phase anaerobic digestions Slurry-phase anaerobic digestions
    Supply of fresh water for dilution before digestion 13.3 m3 of water t-1 of dry manure 0
    Supply of iron-containing clay 0 0.25 t of clay m-3 of chicken manure or 1.7 ton of clay per ton of dry manure
    Wastewater effluent 13.3 m3 of wastewater t-1 of dry manure 0
    Mixing Stirring of manure and water in the digestion tank Mixing with clay in rotating drum reactor before digestion
    Separation of solid and liquid wastes after digestion Sedimentation tank or centrifuge No need to separate. Clay slurry after digestion can be used for fertilization of sandy soil.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The anaerobic decomposition of nitrogen-rich waste produces ammonium that is in equilibrium with free ammonia, which is strong inhibitor of methanogenesis [9,10]. For example, concentration of ammonium ions 4.8 g L-1 inhibited methanogenesis by 90% [11,12]. Meanwhile, concentration of ammonium during anaerobic digestion of non-diluted chicken manure was 6.0-6.5 g L-1 [2], from 2 to 16 g L-1 [11,12] and from 3 to 5 g L-1 during anaerobic digestion of the chicken manure in liquid-phase reactor [13,14]. Therefore, strong inhibition of methanogenesis at these conditions was observed.

    There are known many physical and chemical methods for ammonia removal during anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-containing organic wastes [15,16]. The stripping of ammonia from recycled liquid [17], dilution of liquid with water [11], and technically complicated method with the recycle of biogas and the stripping of ammonia from liquid [11,18,19,20,21] can be used to remove up to 80% of the produced ammonia [18,20].

    An adsorption of positively charged ammonium ions on negatively charged clay particles could be useful approach to diminish concentration of free ammonia. An average ammonium adsorption capacity of clay within 30 min at pH 7 is about 40 mg of ammonium g-1 of montmorillonite, vermiculite, bentonite, or zeolite [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Our unpublished data on sorption capacity of clay in the mixture of 5% (w v-1) or 10% (w v-1) clay in solution of ammonium chloride of 5000 mg of N-NH4+ L-1 showed that sorption capacity of bentonite or red argillite was 31-47 mg of N-NH4+ g-1 of clay and 11-15 mg g-1 N-NH4+ of clay, respectively. Ammonium adsorption rates for these clays were in average 20 and 6 mg of N-NH4+ g-1 of clay h-1, respectively. It was shown that after addition of 3-10% (w v-1) of bentonite the cumulative methane production from anaerobically digested chicken manure was increased from 161 in control to 302 mL of methane g-1 of chicken manure [27] and ammonia emission was reduced by 70% [28], probably due to adsorption of ammonium ions by clay. Increase of initial concentration of organic solids from 6% to 16% (w v-1) decreased maxima of the rate of methane production probably due to increase of ammonium concentration (Table 2).

    Table 2.  Anaerobic digestion of chicken manure at different initial concentration of organic solids [13,14].
    Concentration of organic solids, % (w v-1) Maxima of the rate of methane production, normo L of CH4 kg-1 of solids day-1 Concentrations of produced ammonium, g L-1
    Initial Final
    6 17.0 ± 3.2 0.8 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2
    10 10.2 ± 2.4 1.4 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 0.3
    16 6.1 ± 2.5 2.2 ± 0.3 5.0 ± 0.4

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In average, the content of the elements in the dry chicken manure is as follows: С 35%, Н 5%, O 30%, N 5.5%, and S 0.8% [11], so empirical formula of dry chicken manure is CH1.648O0.642N0.133S0.009. This formula can be used to calculate maxima of the anaerobic digestion products according to the Eq 1:

    CH1.648O0.642N0.133S0.009+0.371H2O0.493CH4+0.507CO2+0.133NH3+0.009H2S (1)

    According to this equation, production of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulphide per kg of dry chicken manure after its complete anaerobic digestion will be as follows: CH4 420 L, NH3 77 g, H2S 11.8 g. NH3 is in equilibrium with NH4+ depending on pH.

    Calculations of the ratio of the chicken manure and clay could be done using data that concentration of ammonium during anaerobic digestion of chicken manure with the content of 20% (w w-1) of solids could be up to 6.5 g L-1 [2]. To adsorb 6.5 g L-1 of ammonium, an addition of clay must be at least 162 g L-1. In our experiments [13,14], clay-manure slurry was produced by mixing of 1000 g of red (montmorillonite) clay containing 7% (w v-1) of iron and 25% (w v-1) of water ( = 750 g of inorganic solids + 250 mL of water) and 3000 g of chicken manure with the content of organic solids 15% (w v-1) ( = 450 g of organic solids in average + 2550 mL of water). It was inoculated with 300 mL of enrichment culture for anaerobic digestion enhanced with ferric bioreduction. In this case, the content of total solids, organic solids, and inorganic solids in slurry was in average 28%, 10.5%, and 17.5% (w v-1). Enrichment culture for anaerobic digestion enhanced with ferric bioreduction was produced for 30 d of cultivation of 70 mL of clay-chicken manure slurry inoculated with 20 mL of anaerobic sludge of municipal wastewater treatment plant. Maximum rate of methane production in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of the chicken manure was about 2.8 time higher than that in liquid-phase anaerobic digestion. Additionally, in the case of slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure, there was no consumption of water and no wastewater effluent.

    Fe2+ ions that are produced during bioreduction of iron-containing clay are further hydrolyzed forming insoluble positively, neutral, and negatively charged iron hydroxides, which are adsorbents of negatively and positively charged compounds [29,30,31]. Their ratio depends on the pH as shown in the Eq 2:

    Fe2++x1H2Ox2Fe(OH)++x3Fe(OH)2+x4Fe(OH)3+x5H+ (2)

    Iron hydroxides are adsorbents of negatively and positively charged compounds, including phosphate [29,30,31]. In case of anaerobic digestion of organic wastes, bioreduction of ferric and precipitation of ferrous phosphate will prevent leaching of phosphate to environment from disposed clay slurry.

    The clay slurry after anaerobic digestion could be used as soil fertilizer and enhancer of the sandy soil texture. Clay adsorbs potassium ions [32] of the chicken manure, so clay slurry after digestion and bioreduction of iron is enhanced with ammonium, potassium and phosphate. Our calculations show that clay after slurry-phase anaerobic digestion can contain about 1% of potassium, 0.5% of phosphorus, and 2% of nitrogen. Therefore, this clay slurry could be used as a soil amendment to enhance fertility of soil.

    The sources of hydrogen sulphide in anaerobic digestion are sulphur-containing aminoacids and bioreduced sulphate. Methanogenesis was inhibited by 50% at the concentration of 184-354 mg of H2S L-1 [33,34]. In our experiments on anaerobic digestion of the chicken manure in liquid-phase reactors, the concentration of hydrogen sulphide was 212 mg L-1 [13,14], which is in the range of inhibiting levels for methanogenesis.

    Hydrogen sulphide is not only inhibitor of methanogenesis but also dangerous substance for human health [7]. During the agitation or mixing of swine manure in a deep pit storage system the concentration of hydrogen sulphide was observed at levels exceeding 300 mg m-3 of air inside the barn [35]. Meanwhile, hydrogen sulphide concentrations of 300-450 mg m-3 of air can result in conjunctivitis and respiratory tract irritation after 1 h, and concentrations of 750-1050 mg m-3 of air can result in collapse in 5 min [36].

    Probably, the best option to avoid inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphide is its precipitation using ferrous ions produced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) of clay or iron ore [29,37,38] that is going by the Eq 3:

    Fe2++S2FeS (3)

    To ensure this reaction, iron of iron-containing clay or hematite iron ore, mostly Fe2O3, must be reduced to soluble ferrous ions by iron-reducing bacteria. Electron donor for bioreduction of ferric could be organic acids, preferably acetate [29,39]. Bioreduction is going according to the Eq 4:

    8Fe3++CH3COOH8Fe2++8H++2CO2+2H2O (4)

    Acetate is the major product of acidogenic fermentation of carbohydrates of organic waste.

    The most available source of iron for this process can be iron of clay or the powder of hematite iron ore. The content of iron in clay minerals is 29% in nontronite, 18% in glauconite, less in other minerals, and some portion of iron in natural red clay is in the form of ferric (hydr)oxides [40]. Iron-rich bentonites can contain up to 7.5% (w w-1) of iron [41]. From the stoichiometry of the Eq 3, addition of clay that contains 15% of iron (equal to 2.7 mmol of Fe g-1 of dry clay) can precipitate 86 mg of sulphide g-1 of dry clay. Calculations from Eq 1 showed that the concentration of H2S for slurry-phase fermentation with 15% of organic solids can reach 1.77 g L-1. This concentration is above inhibitory level. However, addition of 25% (w v-1) of clay with 15% of Fe(Ⅲ) for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure can remove 3.2 g L-1 S2-, so the final concentration of sulphide will be zero due to precipitation of sulphide with dissolved Fe2+. Clay that contains 10% of iron can precipitate 57 mg of sulphide g-1 of dry clay and addition of 25% (w v-1) of this clay for slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure can remove 1.42 g L-1 S2-, so the final concentration of sulphide will be 0.35 g L-1 S2-, which is in inhibitory concentration range. Thus, only clay with sufficient content of iron could be used to ensure concentration of H2S lower than inhibition levels. If the content of iron is not sufficient, iron ore dust, ferric chloride or ferric hydroxide can be used as addition to clay slurry.

    Many anaerobic bacteria are able to reduce Fe(Ⅲ) in clay minerals thus producing dissolved Fe(Ⅱ) [40,42,43]. Different organic compounds, even xenobiotics, can be used as electron donors for ferric bioreduction [38]. Actually, an addition of not only iron-containing clay, but other iron-containing substances such as iron ore, iron hydroxide, ferric or ferrous chloride can significantly enhance anaerobic digestion of organic wastes probably due to elimination of inhibitory effect of sulphide and long-chain fatty acids on methanogenesis [29,38,44,45]. To initiate growth of iron-reducing bacteria in the mixture of red clay and chicken manure during slurry-phase anaerobic digestion it could be inoculated by the mixture of iron-reducing bacteria from the previous cycles of anaerobic digestion enhanced with ferric bioreduction.

    The concentration of total Fe(Ⅱ) increased almost linearly during anaerobic digestion of organic matter. The maximum Fe(Ⅱ) production rate was 58 ± 3 g of ferrous ions m-3 d-1. It was shown in our triplicate-performed experiments [38] that the rate of methanogenesis linearly depended on the molar ratio of Fe/S in slurry of clay and chicken manure (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Effect of the molar ratio of Fe/S in slurry of clay and chicken manure on the average rate of methanogenesis for 14 d.

    Average concentration of sulphide after 40 d of liquid-phase anaerobic digestion was 200 mg L-1, while in slurry-phase anaerobic digestion it was only 2 mg L-1. It was shown in our experiments [13,14] that it was almost no sulphide in slurry when the content of iron in clay was sufficient to bind sulphide (Figure 2). Probably, slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced by Fe(Ⅲ) bioreduction could be suitable for all organic wastes with high content of organic sulphur or sulphate.

    Figure 2.  Concentration of sulphide in liquid-phase (triangles) and slurry-phase enhanced with bioreduction of iron (circles) anaerobic digestion.

    Wastes of vegetable oil refinery, fish processing, slaughterhouse, wool scouring, and dairy production contain lipids, which are hydrolyzed to long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) and glycerol during anaerobic digestion. It is well known that salts of LCFA are inhibitors of both acidogenic fermentation and methanogenesis because these substances are surfactants damaging integrity of cell membrane [11].

    Addition of dissolved ferrous/ferric salts diminished the inhibitory effect of LCFA because of the precipitation of LCFA as iron salt. Precipitation of LCFA with either added ferrous salt [37], or soluble ferrous ions produced by bacterial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) [29,38,39,44] could be used following the Eq 5:

    2RCOO+Fe2+(RCOO)2Fe (5)

    For example, degradation of stearic acid, one of model compound of LCFA, was improved for 10 d in the presence of divalent iron by 150% [44,46]. Iron ore or even iron-containing clay can be applied even for anaerobic degradation of vegetable oil. The methane production was increased 1.5 times as compared to control without clay addition. COD removal efficiency was 98%, 80% and 77%, when iron was added to ensure the ratio of 20, 40, and 80 mg of Fe mg-1 of COD, respectively. Acetic and propionic acids were accumulated in the methanogenic reactors and inhibited methanogenesis when either iron was not present or COD/Fe ratio was higher than 20. However, no accumulation of soluble acetic and propionic acids was observed when the mass ratio of COD/Fe was below 20. So, presence of iron(Ⅱ) significantly improved anaerobic digestion of the lipid-containing wastes [44,45,46]. It is known an application of ferrous for the combination of Fenton's oxidation together with anaerobic digestion of oily wastes [47]. However, hydrolysis of vegetable oil and precipitation of ferrous salts of produced long-chain fatty acids after bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in clay or iron ore could be more effective technology.

    Anaerobic digestion enhanced by iron bioreduction could be used also for digestion of activated sludge on municipal wastewater treatment plants. Hydraulic retention times in the anaerobic digester, augmented with an iron-reducing microbial consortium and ferric (hydr)oxide, can be decreased from 20 to 10 d [48]. An addition of 1.25% (w v-1) ferric chloride to the anaerobic digester of activated sludge removed sulphide and volatile organic sulphur compounds from biogas [49]. An addition of goetite (ferric oxide) promoted anaerobic digestion of algal biomass and methanogenesis [50]. There are other numerous examples of positive effect of the ferric bioreduction on anaerobic digestion [51,52,53]. Therefore, the interactions between the biogeochemical cycles of phosphorus, sulfur and iron were studied and modeled for improvement of anaerobic digestion process [54].

    An additional benefit of slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced by Fe(Ⅲ) bioreduction could be also elimination of inhibition of acidogenesis and methanogenesis by humic and fulvic acids [55,56,57]. These compounds with negatively charged COOH and OH groups could be precipitated by cations of Fe2+ and Fe(OH)+ or due to the formation of Fe2+ bridges between negatively charged humic acid and clay particles [58,59].

    Slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure enhanced by microbial reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) in iron-containing clay or hematite iron ore could be useful in practice, especially in arid regions of developing countries because of such advantages over liquid-phase digestion as absence of water consumption and wastewater effluent as well as faster and bigger production of methane. An addition of clay, containing sufficient quantity of Fe(Ⅲ), can eliminate inhibition of anaerobic digestion by ammonium, sulphide, long-chain fatty acids, and probably humic acids. However, economic benefits of slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of the chicken manure depend on the local availability and costs for iron-containing clay, iron ore powder, water supply and wastewater treatment.

    Commercial applications of iron bioreduction in anaerobic digestion of organic wastes are protected by the patent of USA 7393452 "compositions and methods for the treatment of wastewater and other waste" [60]. The proposed schematics of the process for anaerobic slurry-phase anaerobic digestion of chicken manure enhanced by bioreduction of Fe(Ⅲ) is shown in Figure 3. However, combination of clay slurry-process and ferric bioreduction was not studied yet in full scale, so this review is aiming to initiate these studies and potential applications.

    Figure 3.  The schematics of the clay slurry-phase anaerobic digestion enhanced by ferric bioreduction.

    This study of anaerobic digestion enhanced by microbial reduction of iron was partially supported by the National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine; Junior Academy of Sciences, Kyiv, Ukraine; Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan; Iowa State University, Ames, USA; Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea; and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Andre L, Pauss A, Ribeiro T (2018) Solid anaerobic digestion: state-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles. Bioresource Technol 247: 1027–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.003
    [2] Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, et al. (2000) High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J Agr Eng Res 76: 51–60. doi: 10.1006/jaer.2000.0529
    [3] Ge X, Xu F, Li Y (2016) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent progress and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 205: 239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.050
    [4] Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, et al. (2015) Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44: 824–834. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.002
    [5] Wei P, Mudde RF, Uijttewaal WSJ, et al. (2019) Characterising the two-phase flow and mixing performance in a gas-mixed anaerobic digester: importance for scaled-up applications. Water Res 149: 86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.077
    [6] Wang H, Tao Y, Temudo M, et al. (2015) An integrated approach for efficient biomethane production from solid bio-wastes in a compact system. Biotechnol Biofuels 8: 62. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0237-8
    [7] Marks PJ, Wujcik WJ, Loncar AF (1994) Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0. Available from: https://frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-14.html.
    [8] Vamini B, Vianney T, Jo YS (2017) Water for small-scale biogas digesters in Sub-Saharan Africa. GCB Bioenergy 9: 339–357. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12339
    [9] Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G (2013) A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresource Technol 143: 632–641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030
    [10] Yenigun O, Demirel B (2013) Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem 48: 901–911. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.012
    [11] Niu Q, Qiao W, Qiang H, et al. (2013) Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresource Technol 137: 358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.080
    [12] Niu Q, Kubota K, Qiao W, et al. (2015) Effect of ammonia inhibition on microbial community dynamic and process functional resilience in mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure. J Chem Technol Biot 90: 2161–2169. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4527
    [13] Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2014) Thermophilic methane digestion of chicken manure. Ukrainian Food J 3: 587–594.
    [14] Salyuk AI, Zhadan SO, Shapovalov EB (2015) Thermophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure in a wide range of substrate moisture contents. J Food Packag Sci Tech Technol 4: 36–40.
    [15] Zhang W, Lau A (2007) Reducing ammonia emission from poultry manure composting via struvite formation. J Chem Technol Biot 82: 598–602. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1701
    [16] Krakat N, Demirel B, Anjum R (2017) Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Sci Technol 76: 1925–1938. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.406
    [17] Zhang L, Lee Y, Jahng D (2012) Ammonia stripping for enhanced biomethanization of piggery wastewater. J Hazard Mater 199: 36–42.
    [18] Surmeli RO, Bayrakdar A, Calli B (2017) Removal and recovery of ammonia from chicken manure. Water Sci Technol 75: 2811–2817. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.116
    [19] Markou G (2015) Improved anaerobic digestion performance and biogas production from poultry litter after lowering its nitrogen content. Bioresource Technol 196: 726–730. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.067
    [20] Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, et al. (2010) Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresource Technol 101: 6368–6373. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.071
    [21] Laureni M, Palatsi J, Llovera M, et al. (2013) Influence of pig slurry characteristics on ammonia stripping efficiencies and quality of the recovered ammonium-sulfate solution. J Chem Technol Biot 88: 1654–1662. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4016
    [22] Alshameri A, He H, Zhu J, et al. (2018) Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms. Appl Clay Sci 159: 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007
    [23] Zhu R, Chen Q, Zhou Q, et al. (2016) Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Appl Clay Sci 123: 239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.024
    [24] Borisover M, Davis JA (2015) Adsorption of inorganic and organic solutes by clay minerals, In: Tournassat C, Steefel C, Bourg I, et al., Natural and Engineered Clay Barriers, Elsevier 6: 33–70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100027-4.00002-4
    [25] Khosravi A, Esmhosseini M, Khezri S (2014) Removal of ammonium ion from aqueous solutions using natural zeolite: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Res Chem Intermediat 40: 2905–2917. doi: 10.1007/s11164-013-1137-9
    [26] Rožić M, Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Kurajica S, et al. (2000) Ammonical nitrogen removal from water by treatment with clays and zeolites. Water Res 34: 3675–3681. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00113-5
    [27] Ma JY, Pan JT, Gao TL, et al. (2016) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by bentonite addition. Res Environ Sci 29: 442–448.
    [28] Chen H, Awasthi MK, Liu T, et al. (2018) Influence of clay as additive on greenhouse gases emission and maturity evaluation during chicken manure composting. Bioresource Technol 266: 82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.073
    [29] Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Guo CH, et al. (2014) Wastewater engineering applications of BioIronTech process based on the biogeochemical cycle of iron bioreduction and (bio)oxidation. AIMS Environ J 1: 53–66. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2014.2.53
    [30] Ivanov V, Stabnikov V, Tay JH (2018) Removal of the recalcitrant artificial sweetener sucralose and its by-products from industrial wastewater using microbial reduction/oxidation of iron. ChemEngineering 2: 37. doi: 10.3390/chemengineering2030037
    [31] Stabnikov VP, Tay STL, Tay JH, et al. (2004) Effect of iron hydroxide on phosphate removal during anaerobic digestion of activated sludge. Appl Biochem Micro 40: 376–380. doi: 10.1023/B:ABIM.0000033914.52026.e5
    [32] Binner I, Dultz S, Schellhorn M, et al. (2017) Potassium adsorption and release properties of clays in peat-based horticultural substrates for increasing the cultivation safety of plants. Appl Clay Sci 145: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.013
    [33] Visser A, Nozhevnikova AN, Lettinga G (1993) Sulphide inhibition of methanogenic activity at various pH levels at 55 ℃. J Chem Technol Biot 57: 9–14.
    [34] Koster IW, Rinzema A, De Vegt AL, et al. (1986) Sulfide inhibition of the methanogenic activity of granular sludge at various pH levels. Water Res 20: 1561–1567. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90121-1
    [35] Muhlbauer RV, Swestka RJ, Burns RT, et al. (2008) Development and testing of a hydrogen sulfide detection system for use in swine housing. ASABE 6: 084203.
    [36] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2005) Available from: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hydrogensulfide/hazards.html.
    [37] Yuzir A, Yaacob SS, Tijani H, et al. (2017) Addition of ferric chloride in anaerobic digesters to enhance sulphide removal and methanogenesis. Desalin Water Treat 79: 64–72.
    [38] Stabnikov VP, Ivanov VN (2006) The effect of various iron hydroxide concentrations on the anaerobic fermentation of sulfate-containing model wastewater. Appl Biochem Micro 42: 284–288.
    [39] Stabnikov V, Ivanov V (2017) Biotechnological production of biogrout from iron ore and cellulose. J Chem Technol Biot 92: 180–187. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4989
    [40] Stucki JW (2006) Properties and behaviour of iron in clay minerals, In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G, Developments in Clay Science, Elsevier Science Ltd 1: 423–475.
    [41] Markos N (2003) Bentonite-iron interactions in natural occurrences and in laboratory-the effects of the interactions on the properties of bentonite: a literature survey. Working report 2003-55, Posiva Oy.
    [42] Mueller B (2015) Experimental interactions between clay minerals and bacteria: a review. Pedosphere 25: 799–810. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30061-8
    [43] Kostka JE, Dalton DD, Skelton H, et al. (2002) Growth of iron (Ⅲ)-reducing bacteria on clay minerals as the sole electron acceptor and comparison of growth yields on a variety of oxidized iron forms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 6256–6262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6256-6262.2002
    [44] Ahmed Z, Ivanov V, Hyun SH, et al. (2001) Effect of divalent iron on methanogenic fermentation of fat-containing wastewater. Environ Engrg Res 6:139–146.
    [45] Li Z, Wrenn BA, Venosa AD (2006) Effects of ferric hydroxide on methanogenesis from lipids and long-chain fatty acids in anaerobic digestion. Water Environ Res 78: 522–530. doi: 10.2175/106143005X73064
    [46] Ivanov V, Stabnikova EV, Stabnikov VP, et al. (2002) Effects of iron compounds on the treatment of fat-containing wastewaters. Appl Biochem Micro 38: 255–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1015475425566
    [47] Bampalioutas K, Vlysidis A, Lyberatos G, et al. (2019) Detoxification and methane production kinetics from three-phase olive mill wastewater using Fenton's reagent followed by anaerobic digestion. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 265–275. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5772
    [48] Baek G, Kim J, Shin SG, et al. (2016) Bioaugmentation of anaerobic sludge digestion with iron-reducing bacteria: process and microbial responses to variations in hydraulic retention time. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7018-y
    [49] Park CM, Novak JT (2013) The effect of direct addition of iron(Ⅲ) on anaerobic digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Sci Technol 68: 2391–2396. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.507
    [50] Yue ZB, Ma D, Wang J, et al. (2015) Goethite promoted anaerobic digestion of algal biomass in continuous stirring-tank reactors. Fuel 159: 883–886. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.059
    [51] Capson-Tojo G, Girard C, Rouez M, et al. (2018) Addition of biochar and trace elements in the form of industrial FeCl3 to stabilize anaerobic digestion of food waste: dosage optimization and long-term study. J Chem Technol Biot 94: 505–515.
    [52] García-Balboa C, Cautivo D, Blázque, ML, et al. (2010) Successive ferric and sulphate reduction using dissimilatory bacterial cultures. Water Air Soil Poll 207: 213–226. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0130-9
    [53] Wang MW, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2018) Sustainable strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: driving dissimilatory iron reduction with Fenton sludge. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6: 2220–2230. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03637
    [54] Flores-Alsina X, Solon K, Mbamba CK, et al. (2016) Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes. Water Res 95: 370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.012
    [55] Yap SD, Astals S, Lu Y, et al. (2018) Humic acid inhibition of hydrolysis and methanogenesis with different anaerobic inocula. Waste Manage 80: 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.001
    [56] Khadem AF, Azman S, Plugge CM, et al. (2017) Effect of humic acids on the activity of pure and mixed methanogenic cultures. Biomass Bioenerg 99: 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.012
    [57] Stepanov N, Senko O, Perminova I, et al. (2019) A new approach to assess the effect of various humic compounds on the metabolic activity of cells participating in methanogenesis. Sustainability 11: 3158. doi: 10.3390/su11113158
    [58] Greenland DJ (1971) Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Sci 111: 34–41. doi: 10.1097/00010694-197101000-00004
    [59] Boguta P, D'Orazio V, Senesi N, et al. (2019) Insight into the interaction mechanism of iron ions with soil humic acids. The effect of the pH and chemical properties of humic acids. J Environ Manage 245: 367–374.
    [60] Tay JH, Tay STL, Ivanov V, et al. (2008) Compositions and methods for the treatment of wastewater and other waste. US Patent 7393452.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zeba Usmani, Minaxi Sharma, Yevgen Karpichev, Ashok Pandey, Ramesh Chander Kuhad, Rajeev Bhat, Rajesh Punia, Mortaza Aghbashlo, Meisam Tabatabaei, Vijai Kumar Gupta, Advancement in valorization technologies to improve utilization of bio-based waste in bioeconomy context, 2020, 131, 13640321, 109965, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109965
    2. Yevhenii Shapovalov, Sergey Zhadan, Günther Bochmann, Anatoly Salyuk, Volodymyr Nykyforov, Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review, 2020, 10, 2076-3417, 7825, 10.3390/app10217825
    3. Ye B Shapovalov, I L Yakymenko, O M Salavor, K Šebková, The state of the European Union – Ukraine Association Agreement implementation on the air quality, 2022, 1049, 1755-1307, 012044, 10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012044
    4. Roman A. Tarasenko, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Stanislav A. Usenko, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Iryna M. Savchenko, Yevhen Yu. Pashchenko, Adrian Paschke, Comparison of ontology with non-ontology tools for educational research, 2021, 8, 2833-5473, 82, 10.55056/cte.208
    5. Patrizio Tratzi, Doan Thanh Ta, Zhiping Zhang, Marco Torre, Francesca Battistelli, Eros Manzo, Valerio Paolini, Quanguo Zhang, Chenyeon Chu, Francesco Petracchini, Sustainable additives for the regulation of NH3 concentration and emissions during the production of biomethane and biohydrogen: A review, 2022, 346, 09608524, 126596, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126596
    6. Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Roman A. Tarasenko, Stanislav A. Usenko, Adrian Paschke, A semantic structuring of educational research using ontologies, 2021, 8, 2833-5473, 105, 10.55056/cte.219
    7. Pramod Jadhav, Zaied Bin Khalid, Santhana Krishnan, Prakash Bhuyar, A. W. Zularisam, Abdul Syukor Abd Razak, Mohd Nasrullah, Application of iron-cobalt-copper (Fe-Co–Cu) trimetallic nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production, 2022, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-022-02825-2
    8. Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Roman A. Tarasenko, Stanislav A. Usenko, Adrian Paschke, 2021, 10.31812/123456789/4433
    9. Roman A. Tarasenko, Viktor B. Shapovalov, Stanislav A. Usenko, Yevhenii B. Shapovalov, Iryna M. Savchenko, Yevhen Yu. Pashchenko, Adrian Paschke, 2021, 10.31812/123456789/4432
    10. Pramod Jadhav, Zaied Bin Khalid, A.W. Zularisam, Santhana Krishnan, Mohd Nasrullah, The role of iron-based nanoparticles (Fe-NPs) on methanogenesis in anaerobic digestion (AD) performance, 2022, 204, 00139351, 112043, 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112043
    11. Ye B Shapovalov, S A Usenko, A I Salyuk, R A Tarasenko, V B Shapovalov, Sustainability of biogas production: using of Shelford’s law, 2022, 1049, 1755-1307, 012023, 10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012023
    12. Xuna Liu, Luqing Qi, Efthalia Chatzisymeon, Ping Yang, Weiyi Sun, Lina Pang, Inorganic additives to increase methane generation during anaerobic digestion of livestock manure: a review, 2021, 19, 1610-3653, 4165, 10.1007/s10311-021-01282-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5338) PDF downloads(423) Cited by(12)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog