Search Advanced

AIMS Public Health

2023, Volume 10, Issue 4: 775-790. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023052
Previous Article Next Article
Research article

Mississippi church leaders' perceptions of challenges and barriers to the use of consumer wearables among community members

  • 1.
    Public Health, Informatics, and Technology, College of Health Sciences, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • 2.
    Department of English, Foreign Languages, and Speech Communication, College of Liberal Arts, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • 3.
    Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • 4.
    Department of Public Policy & Administration, College of Liberal Arts, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • 5.
    Department of History and Philosophy, College of Liberal Arts, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • 6.
    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Health Sciences, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA
  • Received: 14 June 2023 Revised: 25 July 2023 Accepted: 09 August 2023 Published: 07 October 2023

  • Background 

    Wearables have begun to play a transformative role in health management and disease prevention.

    Objective 

    This study examined the use of wearable devices in African American communities in Mississippi, USA, through the lens of church leaders.

    Methods 

    We conducted focus groups with church leaders to record their perceptions about the use of wearables of their community members. We conducted six focus groups with a total of 89 church leaders from across the state of Mississippi. The focus groups were designed to contextualize and explain the socio-cognitive processes that provided an understanding of wearable device adoption practices among community members. Participants were male and female church leaders who were recruited from the three Mississippi Districts. The church leaders' perceptions of barriers and challenges to the adoption of consumer wearables in their communities were thoroughly analyzed using thematic analysis.

    Results 

    There was great apprehension on the part of community members about the security of the information they entered into the wearable devices and about how that information could be used by other parties. Many community members who understood the value of proactive health behaviors could not afford the high cost of purchasing wearable devices, while others displayed a low level of comfort with technology, believing that wearable use was for younger people.

    Conclusion 

    More expansive adoption of wearable devices in Mississippi will depend on the ability of the public health professionals, policy-makers and manufacturers to address the barriers that were identified by this study, thereby enabling the community to have full access to the potential benefits of these technologies.

    Citation: Monique White, Candis Pizzetta, Edith Davidson, Andre Hines, Mario Azevedo, Fidelis Ikem, Lena M. Jones, Shelia Malone, Girmay Berhie. Mississippi church leaders' perceptions of challenges and barriers to the use of consumer wearables among community members[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 775-790. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023052

    Related Papers:

  • Background 

    Wearables have begun to play a transformative role in health management and disease prevention.

    Objective 

    This study examined the use of wearable devices in African American communities in Mississippi, USA, through the lens of church leaders.

    Methods 

    We conducted focus groups with church leaders to record their perceptions about the use of wearables of their community members. We conducted six focus groups with a total of 89 church leaders from across the state of Mississippi. The focus groups were designed to contextualize and explain the socio-cognitive processes that provided an understanding of wearable device adoption practices among community members. Participants were male and female church leaders who were recruited from the three Mississippi Districts. The church leaders' perceptions of barriers and challenges to the adoption of consumer wearables in their communities were thoroughly analyzed using thematic analysis.

    Results 

    There was great apprehension on the part of community members about the security of the information they entered into the wearable devices and about how that information could be used by other parties. Many community members who understood the value of proactive health behaviors could not afford the high cost of purchasing wearable devices, while others displayed a low level of comfort with technology, believing that wearable use was for younger people.

    Conclusion 

    More expansive adoption of wearable devices in Mississippi will depend on the ability of the public health professionals, policy-makers and manufacturers to address the barriers that were identified by this study, thereby enabling the community to have full access to the potential benefits of these technologies.


    加载中

    Acknowledgments


    We would like to thank all the church leaders from Mississippi districts for their enthusiastic participation in this study. This study was made possible by a grant from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation.

    Conflict of Interest


    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Sung D What is wearable tech? Everything you need to know explained (2015). Available from: https://www.wearable.com/wearable-tech/what-is-wearable-tech-753.
    [2] Huhn S, Axt M, Gunga HC, et al. (2022) The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 10: e34384. https://doi.org/10.2196/34384
    [3] Carpenter A, Frontera A (2016) Smart-watches: A potential challenger to the implantable loop recorder. Europace 18: 791-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv427.euv427
    [4] Jia Y, Wang W, Wen D, et al. (2018) Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring. Peer J 6: e5350. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5350
    [5] Hickey AM, Freedson PS (2016) Utility of consumer physical activity trackers as an intervention tool in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 58: 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.02.006.S0033-0620(16)30016-
    [6] Smuck M, Odonkor CA, Wilt JK, et al. (2021) The emerging clinical role of wearables: factors for successful implementation in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med 4: 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00418-3
    [7] Astle K Study finds people who need wearable health devices the most use them the least. Heart News. Scientific Conferences and Meetings. Diversity Health Equity. Dallas, Texas, AHA Communications & Media Relations Published: October 31, 2022 . Available from: https://newsroom.heart.org/news/study-finds-people-who-need-wearable-health-devices-the-most-use-them-the-least
    [8] Majumder S, Aghayi E, Noferesti M, et al. (2017) Smart homes for elderly healthcare—recent advances and research challenges. Sensors 17: 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112496
    [9] Car J, Tan WS, Huang Z, et al. (2017) eHealth in the future of medications management: Personalization, monitoring and adherence. BMC Med 15: 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0838-0
    [10] Majee W, Anakwe A, Onyeaka K, et al. (2023) Participant Perspectives on the Effects of an African American Faith-Based Health Promotion Educational Intervention: A Qualitative Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 10: 1115-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01299-2
    [11] Airhihenbuwa CO, Ford CL, Iwelunmor JL Why Culture Matters in Health Interventions: Lessons From HIV/AIDS Stigma and NCDs (2014)41: 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019811348719
    [12] Heward-Mills NL, Atuhaire C, Spoors C, et al. (2018) The role of faith leaders in influencing health behaviour: A qualitative exploration on the views of Black African Christians in Leeds, United Kingdom. Pan Afr Med J 30: 199. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.199.15656
    [13] SAMHSA.The opioid crisis and the Black/African American population: an urgent issue. USA SAMHSA (2020) . Available from: https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/SAMHSA_Digital_Download/PEP20-05-02-001_508%20Final.pdf.
    [14] Hendricks L, Bore S, Waller LR (2012) An examination of spirituality in the African American church. Natl Forum Multicult Issues J 9: 1-8.
    [15] Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH).About the MSDH Health Equity Initiative. Mississippi Mississippi State Department of Health (2023) . Available from: https://msdh.ms.gov/page/44,0,236,61.html#:~:text=Establish%20systems%20to%20enable%20MSDH,health%20for%20all%20the%20state's
    [16] Campbell MK, Hudson MA, Resnicow K, et al. (2007) Church-Based Health Promotion Interventions: Evidence and Lessons Learned. Annu Rev Public Health 28: 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth
    [17] Baruth M, Bopp M, Webb B.L, et al. (2015) The Role and Influence of Faith Leaders on Health-Related Issues and Programs in their Congregation. J Relig Health 54: 1747-1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9924-1
    [18] Center for Disease Control and Prevention.African American health—creating equal opportunities for health. USA Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) . Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/45439
    [19] Robinson T (2008) Applying the socio-ecological model to improving fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African Americans. J Community Health 33: 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9109-5
    [20] Gubbels JS, van Assema P, Kremers SP (2013) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and dietary patterns among children. Curr Nutr Rep 2: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-013-0042-6
    [21] Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1983) Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 51: 390-395. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.51.3.390
    [22] Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2008) The transtheoretical model and stages of change. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass pp. 97-121.
    [23] Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 12: 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
    [24] Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    [25] Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, et al. (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Meth 1: 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
    [26] Westerhof GJ, Miche M, Brothers AF, et al. (2014) The influence of subjective aging on health and longevity: A meta-analysis of longitudinal data. Psychology and Aging 29: 793-802. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038016
    [27] Colvonen PJ, DeYoung PN, Bosompra NA, et al. (2020) Limiting racial disparities and bias for wearable devices in health science research. Sleep 43: zsaa159. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa159
    [28] Mann S (2012) Wearable Computing. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Available from: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/wearable-computing.
    [29] Rossi B Wearable technology: will legal issues spoil the party? (2015). Available from: https://www.information-age.com/wearable-technology-will-legal-issues-spoil-party-32420/#:~:text=Inevitably%2C%20wearable%20technologies%20of%20all,manageable%20both%20commercially%20and%20legally.
    [30] Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA, et al. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. NPJ Digit Med 3: 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6
    [31] Ferguson C, Hickman LD, Turkmani S, et al. (2021) Wearables only work on patients that wear them: Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of wearable cardiac monitoring technologies. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal 2: 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.02.001
    [32] Sana F, Isselbacher EM, Singh JP, et al. (2020) Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 75: 1582-1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.046
    [33] Schall MC, Sesek RF, Cavuoto LA (2018) Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals. Hum Factors 60: 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817753907
    [34] Federal Trade Commission.FTC Warns Health Apps and Connected Device Companies to Comply with Health Breach Notification Rule. USA Federal Trade Commission (2021) . Available from: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/09/ftc-warns-health-apps-connected-device-companies-comply-health-breach-notification-rule.
    [35] Reddy RK, Pooni R, Zaharieva DP, et al. (2018) Accuracy of wrist-worn activity monitors during common daily physical activities and types of structured exercise: evaluation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6: e10338. https://doi.org/10.2196/10338
    [36] Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW, Bickler PE (2007) Dark skin decreases the accuracy of pulse oximeters at low oxygen saturation: the effects of oximeter probe type and gender. Anesth Analg 105: S18-S23. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000285988.35174.d9
    [37] Jaewoon Lee, Dongho Kim, Han-Young Ryoo, et al. (2016) Sustainable Wearables: Wearable Technology for Enhancing the Quality of Human Life. Sustainability 8: 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050466
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Public Health
3.1 4.8

Metrics

Article views(1179) PDF downloads(104) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog