Public health nurses (PHNs) are among the few municipal civil servants who lead community infection control and prevention initiatives in Japanese public health centers (PHCs). This study aims to investigate the distress faced by PHNs and clarify their difficulties and working environment relative to infection prevention control activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted a qualitative description methodology in this study of 12 PHNs who were involved in COVID-19 prevention and control in PHCs in Prefecture A. The distress during the early phase of the pandemic was due to the uncertainty of the SARS-CoV-2 related disease, which caused panic in medical institutions and among residents. PHNs were overwhelmed, distressed and exhausted by their inability to control the ‘pandemic’, lack of patient cooperation for prevention control and the unsustainable organizational environment. They were also distressed because they were one of the specialized personnel responsible for saving residents' lives with limited medical resources and while having identity crises due to an inability to carry out the PHN's role of controlling infection in the community. For future crises, rapid, drastic innovation defying conventional organizational systems is critical to reform sustainable organizations so that they play an effective role in the community. Innovation in crisis communication and strengthening the medical system will help achieve a resilient community in a health crisis.
Citation: Akari Miyazaki, Naoko Kumada Deguchi, Tomoko Omiya. Difficulties and distress experienced by Japanese public health nurses specializing in quarantine services when dealing with COVID-19: A qualitative study in peri-urban municipality[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 235-251. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023018
[1] | Wenxue Huang, Yuanyi Pan . On Balancing between Optimal and Proportional categorical predictions. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(1): 129-137. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016.1.129 |
[2] | Dongyang Yang, Wei Xu . Statistical modeling on human microbiome sequencing data. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2019, 4(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2019001 |
[3] | Wenxue Huang, Xiaofeng Li, Yuanyi Pan . Increase statistical reliability without losing predictive power by merging classes and adding variables. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 341-348. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016014 |
[4] | Jianguo Dai, Wenxue Huang, Yuanyi Pan . A category-based probabilistic approach to feature selection. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 14-21. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017020 |
[5] | Amanda Working, Mohammed Alqawba, Norou Diawara, Ling Li . TIME DEPENDENT ATTRIBUTE-LEVEL BEST WORST DISCRETE CHOICE MODELLING. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 55-72. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2018010 |
[6] | Xiaoxiao Yuan, Jing Liu, Xingxing Hao . A moving block sequence-based evolutionary algorithm for resource investment project scheduling problems. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(1): 39-58. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017007 |
[7] | Yaguang Huangfu, Guanqing Liang, Jiannong Cao . MatrixMap: Programming abstraction and implementation of matrix computation for big data analytics. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 349-376. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016015 |
[8] | Tao Wu, Yu Lei, Jiao Shi, Maoguo Gong . An evolutionary multiobjective method for low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(1): 23-37. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017006 |
[9] | Wenxue Huang, Qitian Qiu . Forward Supervised Discretization for Multivariate with Categorical Responses. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(2): 217-225. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016005 |
[10] | Yiwen Tao, Zhenqiang Zhang, Bengbeng Wang, Jingli Ren . Motality prediction of ICU rheumatic heart disease with imbalanced data based on machine learning. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2024, 8(0): 43-64. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2024003 |
Public health nurses (PHNs) are among the few municipal civil servants who lead community infection control and prevention initiatives in Japanese public health centers (PHCs). This study aims to investigate the distress faced by PHNs and clarify their difficulties and working environment relative to infection prevention control activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted a qualitative description methodology in this study of 12 PHNs who were involved in COVID-19 prevention and control in PHCs in Prefecture A. The distress during the early phase of the pandemic was due to the uncertainty of the SARS-CoV-2 related disease, which caused panic in medical institutions and among residents. PHNs were overwhelmed, distressed and exhausted by their inability to control the ‘pandemic’, lack of patient cooperation for prevention control and the unsustainable organizational environment. They were also distressed because they were one of the specialized personnel responsible for saving residents' lives with limited medical resources and while having identity crises due to an inability to carry out the PHN's role of controlling infection in the community. For future crises, rapid, drastic innovation defying conventional organizational systems is critical to reform sustainable organizations so that they play an effective role in the community. Innovation in crisis communication and strengthening the medical system will help achieve a resilient community in a health crisis.
Public Health Nurse;
Public Health Center;
Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
Coronavirus Disease 2019;
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Multi-nominal data are common in scientific and engineering research such as biomedical research, customer behavior analysis, network analysis, search engine marketing optimization, web mining etc. When the response variable has more than two levels, the principle of mode-based or distribution-based proportional prediction can be used to construct nonparametric nominal association measure. For example, Goodman and Kruskal [3,4] and others proposed some local-to-global association measures towards optimal predictions. Both Monte Carlo and discrete Markov chain methods are conceptually based on the proportional associations. The association matrix, association vector and association measure were proposed by the thought of proportional associations in [9]. If there is no ordering to the response variable's categories, or the ordering is not of interest, they will be regarded as nominal in the proportional prediction model and the other association statistics.
But in reality, different categories in the same response variable often are of different values, sometimes much different. When selecting a model or selecting explanatory variables, we want to choose the ones that can enhance the total revenue, not just the accuracy rate. Similarly, when the explanatory variables with cost weight vector, they should be considered in the model too. The association measure in [9],
To implement the previous adjustments, we need the following assumptions:
It needs to be addressed that the second assumption is probably not always the case. The law of large number suggests that the larger the sample size is, the closer the expected value of a distribution is to the real value. The study of this subject has been conducted for hundreds of years including how large the sample size is enough to simulate the real distribution. Yet it is not the major subject of this article. The purpose of this assumption is nothing but a simplification to a more complicated discussion.
The article is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses the adjustment to the association measure when the response variable has a revenue weight; section 3 considers the case where both the explanatory and the response variable have weights; how the adjusted measure changes the existing feature selection framework is presented in section 4. Conclusion and future works will be briefly discussed in the last section.
Let's first recall the association matrix
γs,t(Y|X)=E(p(Y=s|X)p(Y=t|X))p(Y=s)=α∑i=1p(X=i|Y=s)p(Y=t|X=i);s,t=1,2,..,βτY|X=ωY|X−Ep(Y)1−Ep(Y)ωY|X=EX(EY(p(Y|X)))=β∑s=1α∑i=1p(Y=s|X=i)2p(X=i)=β∑s=1γssp(Y=s) | (1) |
Our discussion begins with only one response variable with revenue weight and one explanatory variable without cost weight. Let
Definition 2.1.
ˆωY|X=β∑s=1α∑i=1p(Y=s|X=i)2rsp(X=i)=β∑s=1γssp(Y=s)rsrs>0,s=1,2,3...,β | (2) |
Please note that
It is easy to see that
Example.Consider a simulated data motivated by a real situation. Suppose that variable
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
Let us first consider the association matrix
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
Please note that
The correct prediction contingency tables of
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
The total number of the correct predictions by
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
Given that
In summary, it is possible for an explanatory variable
Let us further discuss the case with cost weight vector in predictors in addition to the revenue weight vector in the dependent variable. The goal is to find a predictor with bigger profit in total. We hence define the new association measure as in 3.
Definition 3.1.
ˉωY|X=α∑i=1β∑s=1p(Y=s|X=i)2rscip(X=i) | (3) |
Example. We first continue the example in the previous section with new cost weight vectors for
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
By
We then investigate how the change of cost weight affect the result. Suppose the new weight vectors are:
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
Hence
By the updated association defined in the previous section, we present the feature selection result in this section to a given data set
At first, consider a synthetic data set simulating the contribution factors to the sales of certain commodity. In general, lots of factors could contribute differently to the commodity sales: age, career, time, income, personal preference, credit, etc. Each factor could have different cost vectors, each class in a variable could have different cost as well. For example, collecting income information might be more difficult than to know the customer's career; determining a dinner waitress' purchase preference is easier than that of a high income lawyer. Therefore we just assume that there are four potential predictors,
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
The first variable to be selected is
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |
As we can see, all
In summary, the updated association with cost and revenue vector not only changes the feature selection result by different profit expectations, it also reflects a practical reality that collecting information for more variables costs more thus reduces the overall profit, meaning more variables is not necessarily better on a Return-Over-Invest basis.
We propose a new metrics,
The presented framework can also be applied to high dimensional cases as in national survey, misclassification costs, association matrix and association vector [9]. It should be more helpful to identify the predictors' quality with various response variables.
Given the distinct character of this new statistics, we believe it brings us more opportunities to further studies of finding the better decision for categorical data. We are currently investigating the asymptotic properties of the proposed measures and it also can be extended to symmetrical situation. Of course, the synthetical nature of the experiments in this article brings also the question of how it affects a real data set/application. It is also arguable that the improvements introduced by the new measures probably come from the randomness. Thus we can use
[1] | WHOWHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard (2022). Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. |
[2] | Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare.Health crisis management in the community-guidelines for community health crisis management. Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2002) . Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/general/seido/kousei/kenkou/guideline/index.html. |
[3] | National Association of Public Health Center Directors.Changes in the number of public health centers. Japan National Association of Public Health Center Directors (2021) . Available from http://www.phcd.jp/03/HCsuii/index.html. |
[4] | Ogata T (2021) COVID-19 up-to-date, role and challenges of public health center in response to COVID-19. Modern Media 67: 48-54. |
[5] | Osumi M (2021) Rise in COVID-19 cases across Japan takes toll on public health centers. The Japan Times . Available from: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/08/04/national/public-health-centers-strain/. |
[6] | Kyodo.20% of Japan's public health center staff overworked with COVID-19 duties. The Japan times (2022) . Available from: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/02/18/national/covid-overwork-health-services/. |
[7] |
Ide K, Asami T, Suda A, et al. (2021) The psychological effects of COVID-19 on hospital workers at the beginning of the outbreak with a large disease cluster on the Diamond Princess cruise ship. PLoS One 16: e0245294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245294 ![]() |
[8] |
Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. (2020) Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 3: e203976. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976 ![]() |
[9] |
Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, et al. (2020) The deterioration of mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak: A population-based cohort study of workers in Japan. Scand J Work Environ Health 46: 639-644. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3922 ![]() |
[10] |
Stone KW, Kintziger KW, Jagger MA, et al. (2021) Public health workforce burnout in the COVID-19 response in the U.S.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084369 ![]() |
[11] |
Du Z, You H, Zhou H, et al. (2021) Difficulties encountered by public health workers in COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study based on five provinces. BMC Health Serv Res 21: 656. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06699-4 ![]() |
[12] | Yamada H, Kusumi M, Yoshida H, et al. (2013) The research on the mental health and body health condition toward public health nurses working for the victims of east Japan great earthquake. Jpn Soc Health Sci Mind Body 9: 26-36. |
[13] | Ushio Y, Osawa T, Shimizu M (2012) The psychological influence of a disaster experience on municipal staff; interviews with public health nurses sixteen months after a flood disaster. UH CNAS, RINCPC Bulletin 19: 41-53. |
[14] |
Usukura H, Seto M, Kunii Y, et al. (2021) The mental health problems of public health center staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Asian J Psychiatr 61: 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102676 ![]() |
[15] |
Nishimura Y, Miyoshi T, Hagiya H, et al. (2022) Prevalence of psychological distress on public health officials amid COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr 73: 103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103160 ![]() |
[16] |
Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health 23: 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G ![]() |
[17] |
Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, et al. (2009) Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research?. BMC Med Res Methodol 9: 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 ![]() |
[18] |
Spencer RA, Joshi N, Branje K, et al. (2021) Early childhood educator perceptions of risky play in an outdoor loose parts intervention. AIMS Public Health 8: 213-228. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2021017 ![]() |
[19] |
Knott A, Kee CC (2005) Nurses' beliefs about family presence during resuscitation. Appl Nurs Res 18: 192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.07.002 ![]() |
[20] | Krippendorff K (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. CA: SAGE Publications 18. |
[21] |
Graneheim UH, Lindgren B, Lundman B (2017) Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 56: 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002 ![]() |
[22] |
Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 ![]() |
[23] | Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 294-301. |
[24] | Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 245-251. |
[25] |
Goularte JF, Serafim SD, Colombo R, et al. (2021) COVID-19 and mental health in Brazil: psychiatric symptoms in the general population. J Psychiatr Res 132: 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.021 ![]() |
[26] |
Maggi G, Baldassarre I, Barbaro A, et al. (2021) Mental health status of Italian elderly subjects during and after quarantine for the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Psychogeriatrics 21: 540-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12703 ![]() |
[27] |
Midorikawa H, Aiba M, Lebowitz A, et al. (2021) Confirming validity of the fear of COVID-19 Scale in Japanese with a nationwide large-scale sample. PloS One 16: e0246840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246840 ![]() |
[28] | Intage.Media contact behavior change during COVID-19 pandemic, Capturing the changes after GW week and after lifting of the state of emergency declaration. Japan Intage (2020) . Available from: https://www.intage.co.jp/covid-19-itgreports/#anc_02. |
[29] |
Ratzan SC, Sommariva S, Rauh L (2020) Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health Res Pract 30: 3022010. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3022010 ![]() |
[30] | Tatara K, Takatorige T, Kondo T Promoting health crisis management in the community: toward specific counter-terrorism measures, Shinkikaku Shuppan (2002). |
[31] |
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, et al. (1988) The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8: 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x ![]() |
[32] |
Sell TK, Boddie C, McGinty EE, et al. (2017) Media messages and perception of risk for Ebola virus infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 23: 108-111. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160589 ![]() |
[33] | Ministry of International Affairs and Communications.WHITE PAPER Information and Communications in Japan. Japan Ministry of International Affairs and Communications (2021) . Available from: https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/eng/WP2021/2021-index.html. |
[34] | Eurostat.Individuals using the internet for seeking health-related information. European Union Eurostat (2022) . Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tin00101/default/line?lang=en. |
[35] |
Sell TK, Hosangadi D, Trotochaud M (2020) Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak. BMC Public Health 20: 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3 ![]() |
[36] |
Suzuki Y, Fukasawa M, Obara A, et al. (2014) Mental health distress and related factors among prefectural public servants seven months after the great east Japan earthquake. J Epidemiol 24: 287-294. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20130138 ![]() |
[37] |
Suzuki Y, Fukasawa M, Obara A, et al. (2017) Burnout among public servants after the Great East Japan Earthquake: decomposing the construct aftermath of disaster. J Occup Health 59: 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-0263-OA ![]() |
[38] |
Kayama M, Akiyama T, Ohashi A, et al. (2014) Experiences of municipal public health nurses following Japan's earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster. Public Health Nurs 31: 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12140 ![]() |
[39] | Saeki K (2022) What is the power of continuing to work as a public health nurse? What it means to work as a public health nurse in a changing business and society. Jpn J Public Health Nurs 78: 12-17. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1664201793 |
[40] | Uozaki H (2010) Crisis Communications for Confidence and Safety. J Jpn Soc for Safety Eng 49: 78-86. https://doi.org/10.18943/safety.49.2_78 |
[41] |
Su Z, Zhang H, McDonnell D, et al. (2022) Crisis communication strategies for health officials. Front Public Health 10: 796572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.796572 ![]() |
[42] | Murai F, Yasuda T (2016) The current situation regarding support provided by public health center nurses in response to infectious disease: outbreaks at facilities for the elderly. Bulletin Nagano College of Nursing 18: 1-14. |
[43] | Tsuboi R, Iida M, Osawa M, et al. (2013) Dilemmas of municipal public health nurses in the welfare sector who provide individual support to psychiatric patients: elements of dilemmas and their relationships. J Jpn Acad Community Health Nurs 15: 32-40. https://doi.org/10.20746/jachn.15.3_32 |
[44] |
Tomioka K, Shima M, Saeki K (2022) Number of public health nurses and COVID-19 incidence rate by variant type: an ecological study of 47 prefectures in Japan. Environ Health Prev Med 27: 18. https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.22-00013 ![]() |
[45] |
Almohammed OA, Aldwihi LA, Alragas AM, et al. (2021) Knowledge, attitude, and practices associated with COVID-19 among healthcare workers in hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health 9: 643053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.643053 ![]() |
[46] | Tanaka K, Yamada Y, Fukuda K, et al. (2014) An experience report in the transport hub for the region in the acceptance of the great east Japan earthquake. Jpn J Disaster Med 19: 175-181. |
[47] |
Lamiani G, Biscardi D, Meyer EC, et al. (2021) Moral distress trajectories of physicians 1 year after the COVID-19 outbreak: a grounded theory study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 13367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413367 ![]() |
[48] |
Holmström I, Höglund AT (2007) The faceless encounter: ethical dilemmas in telephone nursing. J Clin Nurs 16: 1865-1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01839.x ![]() |
[49] |
Holmström IK, Kaminsky E, Lindberg Y, et al. (2021) The perspectives of Swedish registered nurses about managing difficult calls to emergency medical dispatch centres: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nurs 20: 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00657-5 ![]() |
[50] | Saeki K (2012) Considering the “sense of mission” of public health nurses: the soul of public health nurses today. Jpn J Community Health Care 43: 44-47. |
[51] | Shoji H, Ueno M, Okawa S (2018) Factors influencing the formation of professional identity from municipal health nurse's experience process-narrative of experienced public health nurse's experience. Bull Fac Nurs Kobe Women's Univ 3: 55-64. |
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |
1000 | 100 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 200 | 1500 | |||
200 | 1500 | 500 | 300 | 500 | 400 | 400 | 50 | |||
400 | 50 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 700 | |||
300 | 700 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 400 | 1000 | 100 | |||
200 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 400 | 500 | 200 |
0.34 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.25 | |||
0.13 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||
0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.15 | |||
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
471 | 6 | 121 | 83 | 98 | 34 | 19 | 926 | |||
101 | 746 | 159 | 107 | 177 | 114 | 113 | 1 | |||
130 | 1 | 167 | 157 | 114 | 124 | 42 | 256 | |||
44 | 243 | 145 | 85 | 109 | 81 | 489 | 6 | |||
21 | 210 | 114 | 32 | 36 | 119 | 206 | 28 |
total revenue | average revenue | |||
0.3406 | 0.456 | 4313 | 0.4714 | |
0.3391 | 0.564 | 5178 | 0.5659 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.3057 | 12016.17 | 1.3132 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.8546 | 17072.17 | 1.8658 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
0.3406 | 0.3406 | 1.7420 | 15938.17 | 1.7419 | |
0.3391 | 0.3391 | 1.3424 | 12268.17 | 1.3408 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
7 | 0.3906 | 3.5381 | 35390 | 3.5390 | |
4 | 0.3882 | 3.8433 | 38771 | 3.8771 | |
4 | 0.3250 | 4.8986 | 48678 | 4.8678 | |
8 | 0.3274 | 3.7050 | 36889 | 3.6889 |
total profit | average profit | ||||
28 | 0.4367 | 1.8682 | 18971 | 1.8971 | |
28 | 0.4025 | 2.1106 | 20746 | 2.0746 | |
56 | 0.4055 | 1.8055 | 17915 | 1.7915 | |
16 | 0.4055 | 2.3585 | 24404 | 2.4404 | |
32 | 0.3385 | 2.0145 | 19903 | 1.9903 |