Research article Special Issues

A study on vaginitis among pregnant and non-pregnant females in Alexandria, Egypt: An unexpected high rate of mixed vaginal infection

  • Received: 08 February 2022 Revised: 25 March 2022 Accepted: 12 April 2022 Published: 05 May 2022
  • Background

    Many infectious and noninfectious triggers lead to inflammation of the vagina.

    Aim

    We investigated the prevalence of causative vaginitis microorganisms in 516 pregnant and nonpregnant female volunteers. Vaginal samples were examined microscopically, cultured and tested for different pathogens.

    Results

    Of the participants, 310 (60.1%) were pregnant, whereas 206 (39.9%) were nonpregnant. Using Amsel's criteria and Nugent's scores, bacterial vaginosis (BV) was diagnosed in 59.1%, and the prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) was 50.2% in the population. Candida infections were significantly higher in nonpregnant females (p value ≤ 0.01), and 24% of females had mixed infections. The most common mixed infection was BV and Candida spp., detected in 21% of the cases.

    Conclusions

    Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of vaginitis. We observed that 24% of females experienced mixed infections, and Candida albicans was the most common fungal species causing VVC. Trichomonas vaginalis prevalence was underestimated using wet mounts.

    Citation: Sherine Mohamed Shawaky, Mariam Majed Ali Al Shammari, Manal Shafik Sewelliam, Abeer Abd El Rahim Ghazal, Ahmed Noby Amer. A study on vaginitis among pregnant and non-pregnant females in Alexandria, Egypt: An unexpected high rate of mixed vaginal infection[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(2): 167-177. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022014

    Related Papers:

  • Background

    Many infectious and noninfectious triggers lead to inflammation of the vagina.

    Aim

    We investigated the prevalence of causative vaginitis microorganisms in 516 pregnant and nonpregnant female volunteers. Vaginal samples were examined microscopically, cultured and tested for different pathogens.

    Results

    Of the participants, 310 (60.1%) were pregnant, whereas 206 (39.9%) were nonpregnant. Using Amsel's criteria and Nugent's scores, bacterial vaginosis (BV) was diagnosed in 59.1%, and the prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) was 50.2% in the population. Candida infections were significantly higher in nonpregnant females (p value ≤ 0.01), and 24% of females had mixed infections. The most common mixed infection was BV and Candida spp., detected in 21% of the cases.

    Conclusions

    Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of vaginitis. We observed that 24% of females experienced mixed infections, and Candida albicans was the most common fungal species causing VVC. Trichomonas vaginalis prevalence was underestimated using wet mounts.


    Abbreviations

    GBS

    Group B Streptococci

    BV

    Bacterial vaginosis

    VVC

    vulvovaginal candidiasis

    T. Vaginalis

    Trichomonas vaginalis

    C. albicans

    C. albicans.

    加载中


    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Author contributions



    Conceptualization was by Prof. Dr. Abeer Ghazal and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shereen Shawky. Practical work was done by Prof. Dr. Shereen Shawky, Mariam Majed Ali Al Shammari, Dr. Manal Shafik Sewelliam and Dr. Ahmed Noby Amer. Manuscript preparation was by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shereen Shawky and Dr. Ahmed Noby Amer.

    [1] Omosa-Manyonyi GS, Koyio LN, Mwangi EW, et al. (2022) Inadequacies in service delivery for the diagnosis and treatment of vaginitis and vaginosis in Nairobi, Kenya. Int J STD AIDS 5: 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624221087533
    [2] Loveless M, Myint O (2018) Vulvovaginitis-presentation of more common problems in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 48: 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.014
    [3] Paladine HL, Desai UA (2018) Vaginitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 97: 321-329. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0301/p321.html
    [4] Saraf VS, Sheikh SA, Ahmad A, et al. (2021) Vaginal microbiome: Normalcy vs dysbiosis. Arch Microbiol 203: 3793-3802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02414-3
    [5] Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN (2016) The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 29: 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00075-15
    [6] Hay PE (2002) Chapter 7. Bacterial Vaginosis as a Mixed Infection. Polymicrobial Diseases. Washington: ASM Press. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2495/
    [7] Farhan MA, Moharram AM, Salah T, et al. (2019) Types of yeasts that cause vulvovaginal candidiasis in chronic users of corticosteroids. Med Mycol 57: 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy117
    [8] Abbas AM, Shaaban OM, Badran SM, et al. (2016) Risk factors and health hazards of vaginal infections in upper Egypt: a cross sectional study. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 24: 50-56. https://doi.org/10.14456/tjog.2016.14
    [9] Hassan MF, Rund N, El-Tohamy O, et al. (2020) Does aerobic vaginitis have adverse pregnancy outcomes? prospective observational study. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2020: 5842150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5842150
    [10] Agrawal M, Nigam N, Goel R, et al. (2019) Etiopathogenesis of vaginal discharge among married women in reproductive age group residing in rural area of Bhojipura District, Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 8: 2599. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20192638
    [11] Nemery HM (2019) Phenotypic characterization of Vaginal Candidiasis in sudanese pregnant women. Afr J Med Sci 4. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Phenotypic-Characterization-of-Vaginal-CandidiasisNemery/03d63a24aa36247839e9650355fab7b8ad707e8f
    [12] Segal S, Harvie HS, Siegelman E, et al. (2011) Severe atrophic vaginitis causing vaginal synechiae and hematocolpos at menopause. Menopause 18: 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e3181f3285a
    [13] Hobbs MM, Seña AC (2013) Modern diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Infect 89: 434-438. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051057
    [14] Mengistie Z, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, et al. (2013) Comparison of clinical and gram stain diagnosis methods of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Ethiopia. J Clin Diagn Res 7: 2701-2703. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5872.3736
    [15] Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. (1983) Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 74: 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9
    [16] Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, et al. (2008) An adherent Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm persists on the vaginal epithelium after standard therapy with oral metronidazole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 97 e91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.039
    [17] Delaney ML, Onderdonk AB (2001) Nugent score related to vaginal culture in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 98: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01402-8
    [18] Bayona JVM, García CS, Palop NT, et al. (2020) Evaluation of a novel chromogenic medium for Candida spp. identification and comparison with CHROMagar™ Candida for the detection of Candida auris in surveillance samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 98: 115168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115168
    [19] Ambaraghassi G, Dufresne PJ, Dufresne SF, et al. (2019) Identification of Candida auris by use of the updated Vitek 2 yeast identification system, version 8.01: a multilaboratory evaluation study. J Clin Microbiol 57: e00884-00819. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00884-19
    [20] (2019) CLSICLSI supplement M100. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Wayne, PA: . Available from: http://www.iacld.ir/DL/ravesh/CLSI_M100_ed29_SAMPLE_2019_Performance.pdf
    [21] Mahakal NS, Solanki AD, Patel N, et al. (2013) Incidence of various causes of vaginal discharge based on simple laboratory methods on OPD bases in pregnant & nonpregnant women of 11-60 year age group. Med Sci 2. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr
    [22] Ocviyanti D, Rosana Y, Olivia S, et al. (2010) Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis among Indonesian women. Med J Indones 19: 130-135. https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v19i2.396
    [23] Mohammed L, Jha G, Malasevskaia I, et al. (2021) The interplay between sugar and yeast infections: Do diabetics have a greater predisposition to develop oral and vulvovaginal candidiasis?. Cureus 13: e13407. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13407
    [24] Rodrigues CF, Rodrigues ME, Henriques M (2019) Candida sp. infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Med 8: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010076
    [25] Paknejadi M, Bayat M, Razavilar V (2019) Investigating the Frequency of Candida glabrata in diabetic women of tehran with recurrent and non-recurrent vulvovaginal Candidiasis using PCR-RFLP assay. J Med Microbiol Infect Dis 7: 44-51. https://doi.org/10.29252/JoMMID.7.1.2.44
    [26] Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, et al. (2004) Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 104: 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000134783.98382.b0
    [27] Nisha K, Antony B (2018) Analysis of nugent amsel criteria for the detection of female genital tract infections in a tert. J Evol Med Dent Sci 7: 742-746. https://10.14260/jemds/2018/168
    [28] Al-Bayati A (2019) Direct molecular detection of gardnerella Vaginalis and Lactobacillus Spp. in women with bacteria vaginosis. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 13: 1546. https://doi.org/10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00517.6
    [29] Yalew GT, Muthupandian S, Hagos K, et al. (2022) Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis and their associated risk factors among pregnant women from northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 17: e0262692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262692
    [30] Torrone EA, Morrison CS, Chen PL, et al. (2018) Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis among women in sub-Saharan Africa: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 18 HIV prevention studies. PLoS Med 15: e1002511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002608
    [31] Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, et al. (2014) Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology 160: 2272. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.081034-0
    [32] Blostein F, Levin-Sparenberg E, Wagner J, et al. (2017) Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Ann Epidemiol 27: 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.08.010
    [33] Bohannon NJ (1998) Treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 21: 451-456. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.3.451
    [34] Hassan MH, Ismail MA, Moharram A, et al. (2017) Prevalence of vaginal infection by multidrug resistant Candida species among different ages in Egypt. Am J Microbiol Res 5: 78-85. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmr-5-4-2
    [35] Mucci MJ, Cuestas ML, Landanburu MF, et al. (2017) Prevalence of Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana in pregnant women suffering from vulvovaginal candidiasis in Argentina. Ibero-Am J Mycol 34: 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2016.09.001
    [36] Ringdahl EN (2000) Treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am Fam Physician 61: 3306-3312. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2000/0601/p3306.html
    [37] Abdul-Aziz M, Mahdy MA, Abdul-Ghani R, et al. (2019) Bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis and trichomonal vaginitis among reproductive-aged women seeking primary healthcare in Sana'a city, Yemen. BMC Infect Dis 19: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4549-3
    [38] Nu PAT, Nguyen VQH, Cao NT, et al. (2015) Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic women in Central Vietnam. J Infect Dev Countries 9: 655-660. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.7190
    [39] Linhares IM, Giraldo PC, Baracat EC (2010) New findings about vaginal bacterial flora. Rev Assoc Med Bras 56: 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302010000300026
    [40] Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Driscoll M, et al. (2017) Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and serotype distribution worldwide: systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis 65: S100-S111. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix658
    [41] Edwards JM, Watson N, Focht C, et al. (2019) Group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization and disease among pregnant women: a historical cohort study. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5430493
    [42] Cutland CL, Schrag SJ, Thigpen MC, et al. (2015) Increased risk for group B streptococcus sepsis in young infants exposed to HIV, Soweto, South Africa, 2004–2008. Emerg Infect Dis 21: 638. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2104.141562
    [43] Shabayek S, Abdalla S, Abouzeid AM (2014) Serotype and surface protein gene distribution of colonizing group B streptococcus in women in Egypt. Epidemiol Infect 142: 208-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813000848
    [44] Capoccia R, Greub G, Baud D (2013) Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26: 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e328360db58
    [45] McIver CJ, Rismanto N, Smith C, et al. (2009) Multiplex PCR testing detection of higher-than-expected rates of cervical mycoplasma, ureaplasma, and trichomonas and viral agent infections in sexually active australian women. J Clin Microbiol 47: 1358-1363. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01873-08
    [46] Donders G, Bellen G, Ausma J, et al. (2011) The effect of antifungal treatment on the vaginal flora of women with vulvo-vaginal yeast infection with or without bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30: 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1052-6
    [47] Balkus JE, Richardson BA, Mandaliya K, et al. (2011) Establishing and sustaining a healthy vaginal environment: analysis of data from a randomized trial of periodic presumptive treatment for vaginal infections. J Infect Dis 204: 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir241
    [48] Sobel JD, Subramanian C, Foxman B, et al. (2013) Mixed vaginitis-more than coinfection and with therapeutic implications. Curr Infect Dis Rep 15: 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-013-0325-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2592) PDF downloads(205) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog