This study reveals the crease deviation behavior through the developed forming simulation. A combination resistance model was expanded and applied to simulate the 180° folding process of a creased paperboard, using the shear-yield detaching resistance and the out-of-plane fluffing resistance which were based on the isotropic elastro-plastic model. When varying the misalignment of the creasing rule against the groove, the eccentricity of the crease bulging of a white-coated paperboard was compared through the experiment and simulation of the 180° folding process. Comparing the experimental deformation and the simulation, it was explained that the deviation of e contributed to making the crease deviation cd. At the folding test, the 180° folding was compared with the experiment and simulation. The rolling pass of the folded zone was considered to intensify the deviation state. The 180° folding simulation revealed that the crease deviation of cd ≈ 2e was assessed as an ideal condition when using the rolling pass and non-rolling pass. In the case of some shallow indentation in the experiment, 2e < cd < 4e was observed. The inside folded corners were quite different between the simulation and experiment, especially for a certain shallow indentation model. In the simulation, the local crushing was not performed under the assumption of any isotropic properties. In the simulation, the deviation of the creased position at the 180° folding was sufficiently predictable, when compared with experimental behavior.
Citation: Weerayut Jina, Shigeru Nagasawa, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Takaomi Nagumo. Analysis of the folding behavior of a paperboard subjected to indentation of a deviated creasing rule using the finite element method[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(2): 313-341. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023017
This study reveals the crease deviation behavior through the developed forming simulation. A combination resistance model was expanded and applied to simulate the 180° folding process of a creased paperboard, using the shear-yield detaching resistance and the out-of-plane fluffing resistance which were based on the isotropic elastro-plastic model. When varying the misalignment of the creasing rule against the groove, the eccentricity of the crease bulging of a white-coated paperboard was compared through the experiment and simulation of the 180° folding process. Comparing the experimental deformation and the simulation, it was explained that the deviation of
| [1] |
Nygårds M, Bhattacharya A, Krishnan S (2014) Optimizing shear strength profiles in paperboard for better crease formation. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29: 510–520. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520
|
| [2] |
Marin G, Nygårds M, Östlund S (2022) Experimental quantification of differences in damage due to in‐plane tensile test and bending of paperboard. Packag Technol Sci 35: 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2608 doi: 10.1002/pts.2608
|
| [3] | Csavajda P, Böröcz P, Mojzes Á, et al. (2017) The effect of creasing lines on the compression strength of adjustable height corrugated boxes. J Appl Packag Res 9: 15–22. |
| [4] |
Hämäläinen P, Hallbäck N, Gåård A, et al. (2017) On the determination of transverse shear properties of paper using the short span compression test. Mech Mater 107: 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.01.012 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.01.012
|
| [5] |
Robertsson K, Borgqvist E, Wallin M, et al. (2018) Efficient and accurate simulation of the packaging forming process. Packag Technol Sci 31: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2383 doi: 10.1002/pts.2340
|
| [6] |
Viguié J, Dumont PJJ (2013) Analytical post-buckling model of corrugated board panels using digital image correlation measurements. Compos Struct 101: 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.023 doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.023
|
| [7] |
Luong VD, Abbès B, Abbès F, et al. (2019) Experimental characterisation and finite element modelling of paperboard for the design of paperboard packaging. IOP Conf Ser-Mater Sci Eng 540: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/540/1/012014 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/540/1/012014
|
| [8] |
Ristinmaa M, Ottosen NS, Korin C (2012) Analytical prediction of package collapse loads-basic considerations. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27: 806–813. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813
|
| [9] |
Tanninen P, Leminen V, Eskelinen H, et al. (2015) Controlling the folding of the blank in paperboard tray press forming. BioResources 10: 5191–5202. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.3.5191-5202 doi: 10.15376/biores.10.3.5191-5202
|
| [10] |
Awais M, Sorvari J, Tanninen P, et al. (2017) Finite element analysis of the press forming process. Int J Mech Sci 131–132:767–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.053 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.053
|
| [11] |
Bonnet N, Viguié J, Beneventi D, et al. (2023) Reinforcing folding board boxes by printing a PLA patterned grid on their panels: A new approach for lightweighting stiff packaging. Packag Technol Sci 36: 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2705 doi: 10.1002/pts.2705
|
| [12] |
Leminen V, Tanninen P, Mäkelä P, et al. (2013) Combined effect of paperboard thickness and mould clearance in the press forming process. BioResources 8: 5701–5714. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.4.5701-5714 doi: 10.15376/biores.8.4.5701-5714
|
| [13] |
Lindberg G, Kulachenko A (2022) Tray forming operation of paperboard: A case study using implicit finite element analysis. Packag Technol Sci 35: 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2619 doi: 10.1002/pts.2619
|
| [14] |
Gu Z, Hui J, Wang J, et al. (2021) Modelling multiple impacts on the out‐of‐plane cushioning properties of honeycomb paperboard. Packag Technol Sci 34: 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2593 doi: 10.1002/pts.2593
|
| [15] | Nagasawa S, Fukuzawa Y, Yamaguchi D, et al. (2001) Deformation characteristics on creasing of paperboard under shallow indentation. The 10th International Congress of Fracture (ICF10), Honolulu, USA. |
| [16] |
Nagasawa S, Endo R, Fukuzawa Y, et al. (2008) Creasing characteristic of aluminum foil coated paperboard. J Mater Process Technol 201: 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.253 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.253
|
| [17] | Stenberg N, Fellers C, Östlund S (2001) Measuring the stress-strain properties of paperboard in the thickness direction. J Pulp Pap Sci 27: 213–221. |
| [18] |
Nagasawa S, Fukuzawa Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. (2003) Effect of crease depth and crease deviation on folding deformation characteristics of coated paperboard. J Mater Process Technol 140: 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00825-2 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00825-2
|
| [19] | Nagasawa S, Fukushima Y, Sudo A, et al. (2004) Effect of tip shape of creasing rule on creasing deformation characteristics of paperboard. J Japan Soc Technol Plast 45: 178–182 (in Japanese). |
| [20] | Nagasawa S, Murayama M, Sudo A, et al. (2004b) Effect of creaser deviation on folding deformation characteristics of creased paperboard. J Japan Soc Technol Plast 45: 239–243 (in Japanese). |
| [21] |
Nagasawa S, Nasruddin M, Shiga Y (2011) Bending moment characteristics on repeated folding motion of coated paperboard scored by round-edge knife. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 5: 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.5.385 doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.5.385
|
| [22] |
Li Y, Edward S, Reese S, et al. (2016) Anisotropic elastic-plastic deformation of paper : In-plane model. Int J Solids Struct 100–101:286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.024 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.024
|
| [23] |
Li Y, Edward S, Reese S, et al. (2018) Anisotropic elastic-plastic deformation of paper : Out-of-plane model. Int J Solids Struct 130–131: 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.003
|
| [24] | Hine DJ (1987) The rigidity/flexability balance in the creasing of paper based boards. Appita 40: 375–378. |
| [25] |
Cavlin SI (1988) The unique convertibility of paperboard. Packag Technol Sci 1: 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2770010206 doi: 10.1002/pts.2770010206
|
| [26] |
Cavlin SI, Dunder I, Edholm B (1997) Creasability testing by inclined rules—a base for standardized specification of paperboard. Packag Technol Sci 10: 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199707)10:4 < 191::AID-PTS402 > 3.0.CO; 2-J doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199707)10:4<191::AID-PTS402>3.0.CO;2-J
|
| [27] |
Mrówczyński D, Garbowski T, Knitter-Piątkowska A (2021) Estimation of the compressive strength of corrugated board boxes with shifted creases on the flaps. Materials 14: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185181 doi: 10.3390/ma14185181
|
| [28] |
Garbowski T, Gajewski T (2022) Influence of analog and digital crease lines on mechanical parameters of corrugated board and packaging. Sensors 22: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134800 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3226932
|
| [29] | Sönmez SİNAN, Dölen E, Fleming P (2011) Binder effects on the creaseability of pigment coated paperboard. Asian J Chem 23: 1193–1197. |
| [30] |
Nagasawa S, Yamamoto T, Umemoto K, et al. (2020) Estimation of bending characteristics of creased paperboard using 45° tapered groove against unbalanced punch indentation. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 14: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0083 doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0083
|
| [31] | Hine DJ (1959) Testing boxboard creasing. Modern Packaging 8: 122–128. |
| [32] |
Huang H, Hagman A, Nygårds M, et al. (2014) Quasi static analysis of creasing and folding for three paperboards. Mech Mater 69: 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.016 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.016
|
| [33] |
Leminen V, Niini A, Tanninen P, et al. (2021) Comparison of creasing and scoring in the manufacturing of folding cartons. Procedia Manuf 55: 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.031 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.031
|
| [34] | Carey K (1992) Creasing: Turning Failure into Success. Packaging Productivity 1: 1–20. |
| [35] |
Carlsson L, De Ruvo A, Fellers C (1983) Bending properties of creased zones of paperboard related to interlaminar defects. J Mater Sci 18: 1365–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111956 doi: 10.1007/BF01111956
|
| [36] |
Tanninen P, Matthews S, Leminen V, et al. (2021) Analysis of paperboard creasing properties with a novel device. Procedia Manuf 55: 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.033 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.033
|
| [37] |
Nygårds M, Sundström J (2016) Comparison and analysis of in-plane compression and bending failure in paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31: 432–440. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2016-31-03-p432-440 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2016-31-03-p432-440
|
| [38] |
Mentrasti L, Cannella F, Pupilli M, et al. (2013) Large bending behavior of creased paperboard. Ⅰ. Experimental investigations. Int J Solids Struct 50: 3089–3096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.018
|
| [39] |
Gong Y, Zhao L, Zhang J, (2017) Delamination propagation criterion including the effect of fiber bridging for mixed-mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ delamination in CFRP multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Technol 151: 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.002
|
| [40] |
Beex LA, Peerlings RH (2012) On the influence of delamination on laminated paperboard creasing and folding. Philos T R Soc A 370: 1912–1924. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0408 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0408
|
| [41] |
Alam P, Toivakka M, Carlsson R, et al. (2009) Balancing between fold-crack resistance and stiffness. J Compos Mater 43: 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998308104227 doi: 10.1177/0021998308104227
|
| [42] | Carlsson L, Feller C, Westerlind B (1982) Finite element analysis of the creasing and bending of paper. Svensk Papperstidning 85: 121–125. |
| [43] | Tryding J, Gustafsson P-J (2000) Characterization of tensile fracture properties of paper. Tappi J 83: 84–89. |
| [44] |
Mäkelä P, Östlund S (2012) Cohesive crack modelling of thin sheet material exhibiting anisotropy, plasticity and large-scale damage evolution. Eng Fract Mech 79: 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.10.001
|
| [45] |
Zechner J, Janko M, Kolednik O (2013) Determining the fracture resistance of thin sheet fiber composites—Paper as a model material. Compos Sci Technol 74: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.007
|
| [46] |
Tryding J, Marin G, Nygårds M, et al. (2017) Experimental and theoretical analysis of in-plane cohesive testing of paperboard. Int J Damage Mech 26: 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789516630776 doi: 10.1177/1056789516630776
|
| [47] |
Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44: 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9 < 1267::AID-NME486 > 3.0.CO; 2-7 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7
|
| [48] |
Park H, Kim S-J, Lee J, et al. (2020) Delamination behavior analysis of steel/polymer/steel high-strength laminated sheets in a V-die bending test. Int J Mech Sci 173: 105430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105430 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105430
|
| [49] |
Carlsson L, Fellers C, De Ruvo A (1980) The mechanism of failure in bending of paperboard. J Mater Sci 15: 2636–2642. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00550769 doi: 10.1007/BF00550769
|
| [50] |
Biel A, Tryding J, Ristinmaa M, et al. (2022) Experimental evaluation of normal and shear delamination in cellulose-based materials using a cohesive zone model. Int J Solids Struct 252: 111755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111755 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111755
|
| [51] |
Confalonieri F, Perego U (2019) A new framework for the formulation and validation of cohesive mixed-mode delamination models. Int J Solids Struct 164: 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.12.032 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.12.032
|
| [52] |
Nygårds M (2022) Relating papermaking process parameters to properties of paperboard with special attention to through-thickness design. MRS Adv 7: 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-022-00282-7 doi: 10.1557/s43580-022-00282-7
|
| [53] |
Huang H, Nygårds M (2011) Numerical and experimental investigation of paperboard folding. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26: 452–467. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2011-26-04-p452-467 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2011-26-04-p452-467
|
| [54] |
Nygårds M (2008) Experimental techniques for characterization of elasticplastic material properties in paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23: 432–437. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p432-437 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2008-23-04-p432-437
|
| [55] |
Hagman A, Nygårds M (2016) Short compression testing of multi-ply paperboard, influence from shear strength. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2016-31-01-p123-134 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2016-31-01-p123-134
|
| [56] |
Huang H, Nygårds M (2010) A simplified material model for finite element analysis of paperboard creasing. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 25: 505–512. https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p505-512 doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p505-512
|
| [57] |
Choi DD, Lavrykov SA, Ramarao BV (2012) Delamination in the scoring and folding of paperboard. Tappi J 11: 61–66. https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ11.1.61 doi: 10.32964/TJ11.1.61
|
| [58] |
Hagman A, Huang H, Nygårds M (2013) Investigation of shear induced failure during SCT loading of paperboards. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28: 415–429. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2013-28-03-p415-429 doi: 10.3183/npprj-2013-28-03-p415-429
|
| [59] |
Sudo A, Nagasawa S, Fukuzawa Y, et al. (2005) Analysis of exfoliation of laminated layers and creasing deformation of paperboard. Proc Hokuriku-Shinetsu Dist Annu Conf Japan Soc Mech Eng 047-1: 35–36 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmehs.2005.42.35 doi: 10.1299/jsmehs.2005.42.35
|
| [60] |
Beex LA., Peerlings RH (2009) An experimental and computational study of laminated paperboard creasing and folding. Int J Solids Struct 46: 4192–4207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.08.012
|
| [61] |
Nygårds M, Just M, Tryding J (2009) Experimental and numerical studies of creasing of paperboard. Int J Solids Struct 46: 2493–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.014
|
| [62] |
Giampieri A, Perego U, Borsari R (2011) A constitutive model for the mechanical response of the folding of creased paperboard. Int J Solids Struct 48: 2275–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.002
|
| [63] |
Jina W, Nagasawa S, Chaijit S (2017) Estimation of detaching resistance of a peeled in-plane layer of a white-coated paperboard using fluffing resistance and an isotropic elasticity model. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0018 doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0018
|
| [64] |
Jina W, Nagasawa S (2018) Finite element analysis of the folding process of creased white-coated paperboard using a combined fluffing resistance and shear yield glue model. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 12: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2018jamdsm0063 doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.2018jamdsm0063
|
| [65] | MSC Software (2010a) Marc document volume A: Theory and user information. 567–568. |
| [66] | Komiyama Y, Kon W, Nagasawa S, et al. (2013) Effect of structural shape of corrugated medium on flat crush characteristics of corrugated fiberboard. J Chinese Soc Mech Eng 34: 361–369. |
| [67] | Wink WA (1961) The effect of relative humidity and temperature on paper properties. Tappi 44: 171A–178A. |
Figures(17) / Tables(6)
Weerayut Jina, Shigeru Nagasawa, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Takaomi Nagumo. Analysis of the folding behavior of a paperboard subjected to indentation of a deviated creasing rule using the finite element method[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(2): 313-341. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023017
DownLoad: