To achieve the ideal emissions reduction goals, several studies have suggested that carbon emissions should be examined in the framework of both territorial and consumption-based emissions. Nevertheless, the European Union (EU) SDGs targets aimed at mitigating carbon emissions based on the United Nation (UN) Kyoto Protocol structure, only appears to be concerned with the reduction of territorial-based emissions whilst emissions embodied on imported goods and services receive very little attention. To this end, this study examines the contributions of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) and disaggregate trade flows toward consumption-based sustainability in twenty-one (21) EU countries for the period 1995–2019. The study utilizes the STIRPAT model (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology) and battery of advanced econometric techniques such as the Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL), Common Correlated Effects (CCE) and the Cross-Sectional Distributed Lags (CS-DL) to examine the short-and long-run dynamics of OFDI and trade on consumption-based emissions. Finding reveals that EU exports and OFDI spillover reduces consumption-based emission, whilst import of goods and services promote emissions both in the short-run and long-run. This suggests that the progress report on carbon emissions reduction for most EU countries under the greenhouse gas accounting systems are merely carbon emissions outsourced to low-income countries whilst consumption-based emission continues to increase. These findings are robust to several econometric problems with set of policy implications provided for policymakers and governments to formulate more efficient strategies toward the mitigation of consumption-based carbon emissions among EU countries.
Citation: Osarumwense Osabuohien-Irabor, Igor M. Drapkin. Toward achieving zero-emissions in European Union countries: The contributions of trade and overseas direct investments in consumption-based carbon emissions[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 129-156. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023008
To achieve the ideal emissions reduction goals, several studies have suggested that carbon emissions should be examined in the framework of both territorial and consumption-based emissions. Nevertheless, the European Union (EU) SDGs targets aimed at mitigating carbon emissions based on the United Nation (UN) Kyoto Protocol structure, only appears to be concerned with the reduction of territorial-based emissions whilst emissions embodied on imported goods and services receive very little attention. To this end, this study examines the contributions of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) and disaggregate trade flows toward consumption-based sustainability in twenty-one (21) EU countries for the period 1995–2019. The study utilizes the STIRPAT model (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology) and battery of advanced econometric techniques such as the Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL), Common Correlated Effects (CCE) and the Cross-Sectional Distributed Lags (CS-DL) to examine the short-and long-run dynamics of OFDI and trade on consumption-based emissions. Finding reveals that EU exports and OFDI spillover reduces consumption-based emission, whilst import of goods and services promote emissions both in the short-run and long-run. This suggests that the progress report on carbon emissions reduction for most EU countries under the greenhouse gas accounting systems are merely carbon emissions outsourced to low-income countries whilst consumption-based emission continues to increase. These findings are robust to several econometric problems with set of policy implications provided for policymakers and governments to formulate more efficient strategies toward the mitigation of consumption-based carbon emissions among EU countries.
| [1] |
Spaiser V, Scott K, Owen A, et al. (2019) Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda. Int J Sust Dev World 26: 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1559252 doi: 10.1080/13504509.2018.1559252
|
| [2] |
Rahman MM, Ahmed R, Mashud AHM, et al. (2022) Consumption-based CO2 emissions on sustainable development goals of SAARC Region. Sustainability 14: 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031467 doi: 10.3390/su14031467
|
| [3] | European Commission (2011) A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0112:FIN:en:PDF. |
| [4] | European Commission (2021) How has the EU progressed towards the sustainable development goals. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news. |
| [5] | European Commission (2015) Intended nationally determined contribution of the EU and its member states, UNFCCC. Available from: http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published. |
| [6] |
Sandström V, Valinb H, Krisztin T, et al. (2018) The role of trade in the greenhouse gas footprints of EU diets. Glob Food Secur 19: 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.007
|
| [7] |
Kastner T, Erb K H, Haberl H (2014) Rapid growth in agricultural trade: Effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Env Res Lett 9: 034015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015
|
| [8] | Becqué R, DubskY E, Hamza-Goodacre D, et al. (2017) Europe's carbon loophole. Draft report for consultation. Available from: https://www.climateworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/EU-carbon-loophole_final-draft-for-consultation.pdf. |
| [9] | Moran D, Hasanbeigi A, Springer C (2018) The carbon loophole in climate policy: Quantifying the embodied carbon in traded products. Available from: https://www.climateworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Carbon-Loophole-in-Climate-Policy-Final.pdf. |
| [10] |
Bloom NC, Genakos R, Sadun J, et al. (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. AMP 26: 12–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077 doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0077
|
| [11] |
Branstetter L (2006) Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? J Int Econ 68: 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.006
|
| [12] |
Halicioglu F, Ketenci N (2016) The impact of international trade on environmental quality: The case of transition countries. Energy 109: 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.013 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.013
|
| [13] |
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energ 94: 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
|
| [14] |
Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus in Asia: A heterogeneous. common factor panel analysis. Sustainability 10: 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103627 doi: 10.3390/su10103627
|
| [15] |
Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energ Econ 69: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004
|
| [16] |
Hasanov F, Liddle B, Mikayilov C (2018) The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energ Econ 74: 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004
|
| [17] |
Fernandez-Amador O, Francois J, Oberdabernig D, et al. (2017) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories. Ecol Econ 135: 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.004
|
| [18] |
Knight K. Schor J (2014) Economic growth and climate change: A cross-national analysis of territorial and consumption-based carbon emissions in high-income countries. Sustainability 6: 3722–3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063722 doi: 10.3390/su6063722
|
| [19] |
Marques A, Rodrigues J, Lenzen M, et al. (2012) Income-based environmental responsibility. Ecol Econ 84: 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.010
|
| [20] |
Bhattacharya M, Inekwe J N, Sadorsky P (2020) Consumption-based and territory-based carbon emissions intensity: Determinants and forecasting using club convergence across countries. Energ Econ 86: 104632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104632 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104632
|
| [21] |
Dong BM, Wang F, Guo YB (2016) The global EKCs. Int Rev Econ Financ 43: 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.010
|
| [22] |
Gyam AB (2021) Consumption-based carbon emission and foreign direct investment in oil production sub-Sahara african countries: The role of natural resources and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 13154–13166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16509-3 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16509-3
|
| [23] |
Yang LG, Liu YN (2013) Can Japan's outwards FDI reduce its CO2 emissions? A new thought on polluter haven hypothesis. Adv Mater Res 807–809: 830–834. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.807-809.830 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.807-809.830
|
| [24] |
Mohanty S, Sethi N (2021) The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: The role of outward foreign direct investment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 19714–19730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4
|
| [25] |
Borghesi S, Franco C, Marin G (2020) Outward foreign direct investment patterns of Italian firms in the European Union's emission trading scheme. Scand J Econ 122: 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12323 doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12323
|
| [26] |
Zhang QX, Naqvi SAA, Shah SAR (2021) The contribution of outward foreign direct investment, human well-being, and technology toward a sustainable environment. Sustainability 13: 11430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011430 doi: 10.3390/su132011430
|
| [27] |
Wood R, Stadler K, Simas M (2018) Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: Resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. J Ind Ecol 22: 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12735 doi: 10.1111/jiec.12735
|
| [28] |
Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46: 10883–10891. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949t doi: 10.1021/es301949t
|
| [29] |
Karstensen J, Peters GP, Andrew RM (2018) Trends of the EU's territorial and consumption-based emissions from 1990 to 2016. Climatic Change 151: 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2296-x doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2296-x
|
| [30] |
Fezzigna P, Borghesi S, Caro D (2019) Revising emission responsibilities through consumption-based accounting: A european and post-brexit perspective. Sustainability 11: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020488 doi: 10.3390/su11020488
|
| [31] |
Liobikien G, Dagiliut R (2016) The relationship between economic and carbon footprint changes in EU: The achievements of the EU sustainable consumption and production policy implementation. Environ Sci Policy 61: 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.017
|
| [32] |
Valodka I, Snieska V, Mihi-Ramirez A (2020) Impact of the international trade on the EU clothing industry carbon emissions. Inzinerine Ekon-Eng Econ 31: 314–322. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.3.25012 doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.31.3.25012
|
| [33] | Friedlingstein P, O'Sullivan M, Jone MW et al. (2020) Supplemental data of the Global carbon Budget 2020, Carbon Portal. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2020. |
| [34] | World bank (2020) World bank indicators, World bank group Archives, Washington, D.C. United States. Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. |
| [35] |
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171: 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212 doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
|
| [36] |
Commoner B, Corr M, Stamler PJ (1971) The causes of pollution. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 13: 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1971.9930577 doi: 10.1080/00139157.1971.9930577
|
| [37] |
York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 68: 279–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519769 doi: 10.2307/1519769
|
| [38] | Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecol Rev 1: 277–300. |
| [39] |
Phillips P, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econometrics J 6: 217–259. http://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00108 doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00108
|
| [40] | Jalili Z, Bishak MRS, Azad MAM, et al. (2019) Resource economic growth nexus, role of governance, financial development, globalization, and war: A dynamic approach. J Econ Integr 34: 520–545. |
| [41] | Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data, Cambridge: Cambridge university press. |
| [42] | Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_1229.html. |
| [43] | Swamy PAVB (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38: 311–323. |
| [44] |
Pesaran MH, Yamagata TY (2008) Testing Slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econometrics 142: 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
|
| [45] |
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econometrics 115: 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
|
| [46] |
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econometrics 108: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7 doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
|
| [47] |
Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, et al. (2016) The effect of renewable energy utilization on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energ 162: 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104
|
| [48] |
Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energ Econ 56: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.008
|
| [49] |
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J Appl Econ 22: 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 doi: 10.1002/jae.951
|
| [50] |
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69: 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
|
| [51] |
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econometrics 188: 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
|
| [52] | Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge: MIT Press. |
| [53] |
Azam M, Haseeb M (2021) Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS- does renewable and non-renewable energy matter? Energ Strateg Rev 35: 100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100638 doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100638
|
| [54] |
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74: 967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
|
| [55] |
Liu Z, Pang P, Fang W, et al. (2022) Dynamic common correlated effects of pandemic uncertainty on environmental quality: Fresh insights from East-Asia and Pacific countries. Air Qual Atmos Health 15: 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01164-5 doi: 10.1007/s11869-022-01164-5
|
| [56] |
Hussain M, Khan JA (2021) The nexus of environment-related technologies and consumption-based carbon emissions in top five emitters: Empirical analysis through dynamic common correlated effects estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15333-z doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15333-z
|
| [57] |
Chaudhry IS, Ali S, Bhatti SH, et al. (2021) Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries. Environ Sci Policy 124: 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007
|
| [58] | Ditzen J (2018) Estimating long-run effects in models with cross-sectional dependence using xtdcce2. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bzn/wpaper/bemps81.html. |
| [59] | Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, et al. (2013) Debt, inflation and growth robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data models. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/feddgw/162.html. |
| [60] |
De Vita G, Li C, Luo Y (2021) The inward FDI-Energy intensity nexus in OECD countries: A sectoral R & D threshold analysis. J Environ Manag 287: 112290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112290 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112290
|
| [61] |
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20: 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073 doi: 10.1017/S0266466604203073
|
| [62] |
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61: 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653 doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
|
| [63] |
Leitão NC, Balogh JM (2020) The impact of intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions: The case of the EU. Agric Econ 66: 203–214. https://doi.org/10.17221/312/2019-AGRICECON doi: 10.17221/312/2019-AGRICECON
|
| [64] |
Yasmeen R, Li Y, Hafeez M, et al. (2018) The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: A global potential. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 34360–34379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3
|
| [65] |
Weber H, Sciubba JD (2019) The effect of population growth on the environment: Evidence from european regions. Eur J Population 35: 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0 doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0
|
| [66] |
Shi A (2013) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44: 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9
|
| [67] |
Bongaarts J (1992) Population growth and global warming. Population Dev Rev 18: 299–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973681 doi: 10.2307/1973681
|
| [68] |
Liddle B (2013) Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: Evidence from panel cointegration modeling. Environ Model Software 40: 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.002
|
| [69] |
MacKellar L, Lutz W, Prinz C, et al. (1995) Population, households and CO2 emissions. Population Dev Rev 21: 849–865. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137777 doi: 10.2307/2137777
|
Figures(2) / Tables(12)
Osarumwense Osabuohien-Irabor, Igor M. Drapkin. Toward achieving zero-emissions in European Union countries: The contributions of trade and overseas direct investments in consumption-based carbon emissions[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 129-156. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023008
DownLoad: