The present study is significant because it can contribute to developing sustainable energy strategies and expanding knowledge about renewable energies in Ecuador, specifically by modeling two modules: the thermal module (parabolic solar collectors and energy storage tank) and the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) module. The objective was to determine a region in Ecuador where the thermal module exhibits the highest efficiency for solar collectors. Subsequently, a detailed analysis of the ORC module was conducted, considering the working fluid, boiling temperature, condensation temperature, pinch point temperature, solar collector area, and the collector area-to-energy storage volume ratio (Ac/V). Finally, an economic analysis was performed based on the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and payback period of implementing this type of system. After conducting all the respective analyses in the thermal module, while considering the yearly average meteorological data of ten years (2012–2022), it was determined that due to its meteorological conditions, ambient temperature (14.7 ℃) and solar beam radiation (184.5 W/m2), the efficiency of the collectors in the Andean region of Ecuador is higher. This efficiency is further enhanced by using Therminol VP-1 as the thermal fluid, as it possesses better thermodynamic properties than the other fluids analyzed. Similarly, the ORC module analysis results determined that cyclohexane is the working fluid for the ORC, thereby leading to a higher ORC efficiency (25%) and overall system efficiency (20%). Finally, the system was optimized to maximize the IRR and minimize the Ac/V of the collector for a nominal power of 92 kW. As a result, the optimal operating conditions of the system include a solar collector area of 1600 m2, an energy storage tank volume of 54 m3, an electricity production of 23757 MW/year, a total system efficiency of 22%, an IRR of 15.65% and a payback period of 9.81 years.
Citation: Daniel Chuquin-Vasco, Cristina Calderón-Tapia, Nelson Chuquin-Vasco, María Núñez-Moreno, Diana Aguirre-Ruiz, Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira. Mathematical modeling of a binary ORC operated with solar collectors. Case study—Ecuador[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1153-1178. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023053
The present study is significant because it can contribute to developing sustainable energy strategies and expanding knowledge about renewable energies in Ecuador, specifically by modeling two modules: the thermal module (parabolic solar collectors and energy storage tank) and the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) module. The objective was to determine a region in Ecuador where the thermal module exhibits the highest efficiency for solar collectors. Subsequently, a detailed analysis of the ORC module was conducted, considering the working fluid, boiling temperature, condensation temperature, pinch point temperature, solar collector area, and the collector area-to-energy storage volume ratio (Ac/V). Finally, an economic analysis was performed based on the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and payback period of implementing this type of system. After conducting all the respective analyses in the thermal module, while considering the yearly average meteorological data of ten years (2012–2022), it was determined that due to its meteorological conditions, ambient temperature (14.7 ℃) and solar beam radiation (184.5 W/m2), the efficiency of the collectors in the Andean region of Ecuador is higher. This efficiency is further enhanced by using Therminol VP-1 as the thermal fluid, as it possesses better thermodynamic properties than the other fluids analyzed. Similarly, the ORC module analysis results determined that cyclohexane is the working fluid for the ORC, thereby leading to a higher ORC efficiency (25%) and overall system efficiency (20%). Finally, the system was optimized to maximize the IRR and minimize the Ac/V of the collector for a nominal power of 92 kW. As a result, the optimal operating conditions of the system include a solar collector area of 1600 m2, an energy storage tank volume of 54 m3, an electricity production of 23757 MW/year, a total system efficiency of 22%, an IRR of 15.65% and a payback period of 9.81 years.
| [1] |
Davidy A (2021) Thermodynamic design of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based on petroleum coke combustion. ChemEngineering 5: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering5030037 doi: 10.3390/chemengineering5030037
|
| [2] | ARCONEL, National Electrical Energy Balance—Photovoltaic Energy Production. Available from: https://www.controlrecursosyenergia.gob.ec/balance-nacional-de-energia-electrica/. |
| [3] |
Qu D, Cheng L, Bao Y, et al. (2022) Enhanced optical absorption and solar steam generation of CB-ATO hybrid nanofluids. Renewable Energy 199: 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.150 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.150
|
| [4] |
Bao Y, Huang A, Zheng X, et al. (2023) Enhanced photothermal conversion performance of MWCNT/SiC hybrid aqueous nanofluids in direct absorption solar collectors. J Mol Liq 387: 122577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122577 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122577
|
| [5] | Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy (2017) National Energy Efficiency Plan 2016–2035. Available from: https://www.acreditacion.gob.ec/sae-en-el-plan-de-eficiencia-energetica-2016-2035/. |
| [6] |
Hung TC, Shai TY, Wang SK (1997) A review of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat. Energy 22: 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00165-X doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00165-X
|
| [7] |
Bao J, Zhao L (2013) A review of working fluid and expander selections for Organic Rankine Cycle. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 24: 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.040 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.040
|
| [8] |
Lecompte S, Huisseune H, Van Den Broek M, et al. (2015) Review of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 47: 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.089 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.089
|
| [9] |
Vélez F, Segovia JJ, Martín MC, et al. (2012) A technical, economical and market review of Organic Rankine Cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16: 4175–4189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.022 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.022
|
| [10] |
Zhai H, An Q, Shi L, et al. (2016) Categorization and analysis of heat sources for Organic Rankine Cycle systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 64: 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.076 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.076
|
| [11] |
Karellas S, Leontaritis AD, Panousis G, et al. (2013) Energetic and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery systems in the cement industry. Energy 58: 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.097 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.097
|
| [12] |
Tzivanidis C, Bellos E, Antonopoulos KA (2016) Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manage 126: 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033
|
| [13] |
Delgado-Torres AM, García-Rodríguez L (2012) Design recommendations for solar Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)—Powered reverse osmosis (RO) desalination. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16: 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.135 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.135
|
| [14] |
Ferrara F, Gimelli A, Luongo A (2014) Small-scale concentrated solar power (CSP) plant: ORCs comparison for different organic fluids. Energy Procedia 45: 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.024 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.024
|
| [15] |
Bianchi M, De Pascale A (2011) Bottoming cycles for electric energy generation: Parametric investigation of available and innovative solutions for the exploitation of low and medium temperature heat sources. Appl Energy 88: 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.013 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.013
|
| [16] | Sampedro Redondo JL (2017) Application of low-temperature Organic Rankine Cycles to microgeneration systems. University of Oviedo. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10651/44967. |
| [17] |
Borsukiewicz-Gozdur A, Nowak W (2007) Comparative analysis of natural and synthetic refrigerants in application to low temperature Clausius-Rankine cycle. Energy 32: 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.012
|
| [18] |
Schuster A, Karellas S, Kakaras E, et al. (2009) Energetic and economic investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle applications. Appl Therm Eng 29: 1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.08.016 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.08.016
|
| [19] |
Chacartegui R, Vigna L, Becerra JA, et al. (2016) Analysis of two heat storage integrations for an Organic Rankine Cycle Parabolic trough solar power plant. Energy Convers Manage 125: 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.067 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.067
|
| [20] |
Chen Y, Pridasawas W, Lundqvist P (2007) Low-grade heat source utilization by carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle. Heat Transfer Summer Conf 42746: 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1115/HT2007-32774 doi: 10.1115/HT2007-32774
|
| [21] |
Kaneko S (2016) Integrated coal gasification combined cycle: A reality, not a dream. J Energy Eng 142: E4015018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000312 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000312
|
| [22] |
Wang XD, Zhao L, Wang JL, et al. (2010) Performance evaluation of a low-temperature solar Rankine cycle system utilizing R245fa. Sol Energy 84: 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2009.11.004
|
| [23] |
Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Antonopoulos KA (2016) Exergetic, energetic and financial evaluation of a solar driven absorption cooling system with various collector types. Appl Therm Eng 102: 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.032 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.032
|
| [24] |
Bišćan D, Filipan V (2012) Potential of waste heat in Croatian industrial sector. Therm Sci 16: 747–758. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI120124123B doi: 10.2298/TSCI120124123B
|
| [25] |
Tchanche BF, Lambrinos G, Frangoudakis A, et al. (2011) Low-grade heat conversion into power using Organic Rankine Cycles—A review of various applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15: 3963–3979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.024 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.024
|
| [26] |
Sprouse Ⅲ C, Depcik C (2013) Review of Organic Rankine Cycles for internal combustion engine exhaust waste heat recovery. Appl Therm Eng 51: 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.017 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.017
|
| [27] |
Xie H, Yang C (2013) Dynamic behavior of Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery of heavy duty diesel engines under driving cycle. Appl Energy 112: 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.071 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.071
|
| [28] |
Zhang HG, Wang EH, Fan BY (2013) A performance analysis of a novel system of a dual loop bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with a light-duty diesel engine. Appl Energy 102: 1504–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.018 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.018
|
| [29] |
Franco A, Villani M (2009) Optimal design of binary cycle power plants for water-dominated, medium-temperature geothermal fields. Geothermics 38: 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.08.001
|
| [30] |
Zhai H, Shi L, An Q (2014) Influence of working fluid properties on system performance and screen evaluation indicators for geothermal ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) system. Energy 74: 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.030 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.030
|
| [31] |
García-Rodríguez L, Blanco-Gálvez J (2007) Solar-heated Rankine cycles for water and electricity production : POWERSOL project. Desalination 212: 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.015 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.015
|
| [32] |
Algieri A, Morrone P (2014) Energetic analysis of biomass-fired ORC systems for micro-scale combined heat and power (CHP) generation. A possible application to the Italian residential sector. Appl Therm Eng 71: 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.11.024 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.11.024
|
| [33] |
Algieri A, Morrone P (2014) Techno-economic analysis of biomass-fired ORC systems for single-family combined heat and power (CHP) applications. Energy Procedia 45: 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.134 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.134
|
| [34] |
Drescher U, Brüggemann D (2007) Fluid selection for the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) in biomass power and heat plants. Appl Therm Eng 27: 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.04.024 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.04.024
|
| [35] |
Naranjo-Silva S, Punina-Guerrero D, Rivera-Gonzalez L, et al. (2023) Hydropower scenarios in the face of climate change in Ecuador. Sustainability 15: 10160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310160 doi: 10.3390/su151310160
|
| [36] |
Kalogirou SA (2004) Solar thermal collectors and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30: 231–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2004.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2004.02.001
|
| [37] |
Tzivanidis C, Bellos E, Antonopoulos KA (2016) Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manage 126: 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033
|
| [38] |
Bellos E, Tzivanidis C (2020) Parametric investigation of a trigeneration system with an Organic Rankine Cycle and absorption heat pump driven by parabolic trough collectors for the building sector. Energies 13: 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071800 doi: 10.3390/en13071800
|
| [39] |
Cabrera FJ, Fernández-García A, Silva RMP, et al. (2013) Use of parabolic trough solar collectors for solar refrigeration and air-conditioning applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 20: 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.081 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.081
|
| [40] |
Pei G, Li J, Ji J (2010) Analysis of low temperature solar thermal electric generation using regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle. Appl Therm Eng 30: 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.01.011 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.01.011
|
| [41] |
Sadeghi M, Nemati A, Yari M (2016) Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures. Energy 109: 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.022 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.022
|
| [42] |
Wang R, Jiang L, Ma Z, et al. (2019) Comparative analysis of small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle systems for solar energy utilisation. Energies 12: 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050829 doi: 10.3390/en12050829
|
| [43] |
Cao Y, Gao Y, Zheng Y, et al. (2016) Optimum design and thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine and ORC combined cycle with recuperators. Energy Convers Manage 116: 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.073 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.073
|
| [44] |
Yu H, Helland H, Yu X, et al. (2021) Optimal design and operation of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system driven by solar energy with sensible thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manage 244: 114494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114494 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114494
|
| [45] |
Karim SHT, Tofiq TA, Shariati M, et al. (2021) 4E analyses and multi-objective optimization of a solar-based combined cooling, heating, and power system for residential applications. Energy Rep 7: 1780–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.020
|
| [46] |
Ochoa GV, Ortiz EV, Forero JD (2023) Thermo-economic and environmental optimization using PSO of solar Organic Rankine Cycle with flat plate solar collector. Heliyon 9: e13697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13697 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13697
|
| [47] |
Alshammari S, Kadam ST, Yu Z (2023) Assessment of single rotor expander-compressor device in combined Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and vapor compression refrigeration cycle (VCR). Energy 282: 128763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128763 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128763
|
| [48] |
Maccari A, Bissi D, Casubolo G, et al. (2015) Archimede solar energy molten salt parabolic trough demo plant: A step ahead towards the new krontiers of CSP. Energy Procedia 69: 1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.122 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.122
|
| [49] |
Krishna Y, Faizal M, Saidur R, et al. (2020) State-of-the-art heat transfer fluids for parabolic trough collector. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 152: 119541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119541 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119541
|
| [50] |
Işık S, Yıldız C (2020) Improving thermal energy storage efficiency of solar collector tanks by placing phase change materials in novel finned-type cells. Therm Sci Eng Prog 19: 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100618 doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100618
|
| [51] |
Fasquelle T, Falcoz Q, Neveu P, et al. (2017) Operating results of a thermocline thermal energy storage included in a parabolic trough mini power plant. AIP Conf Proc 1850. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984431 doi: 10.1063/1.4984431
|
| [52] | Haunreiter Echeverría B (2017) Study of technical and economic alternatives for the recovery of waste heat at the Quevedo Ⅱ thermoelectric plant, taking into account climate change mitigation aspects. Available from: http://bibdigital.epn.edu.ec/handle/15000/17498. |
Figures(18) / Tables(10)
Daniel Chuquin-Vasco, Cristina Calderón-Tapia, Nelson Chuquin-Vasco, María Núñez-Moreno, Diana Aguirre-Ruiz, Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira. Mathematical modeling of a binary ORC operated with solar collectors. Case study—Ecuador[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1153-1178. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023053
DownLoad: