Fuzzy-Logical model for analysis of sustainable development of fuel and energy complex enterprises

Alex Borodin; Elena Streltsova; Zahid Mamedov; Irina Yakovenko; Irina Mityshina; Artem Streltsov; Alex Borodin; Elena Streltsova; Zahid Mamedov; Irina Yakovenko; Irina Mityshina; Artem Streltsov

doi:10.3934/energy.2023046

AIMS Energy

2023, Volume 11, Issue 5: 974-990. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023046

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Fuzzy-Logical model for analysis of sustainable development of fuel and energy complex enterprises

1.
Department of sustainable development finance, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 117997 Moscow, Russia
2.
Department of Computer Software, Platov South Russian State Polytechnic University (NPI), 346428 Novocherkassk, Russia
3.
Center for Islamic Finance, Azerbaijan State University of Economics, 1001 Baku, Azerbaijan
4.
Department of Innovative Economics and Finance, Belgorod National Research University, 308015 Belgorod, Russia

Received: 22 May 2023 Revised: 15 August 2023 Accepted: 28 August 2023 Published: 12 October 2023

The purpose of this article is to build a mathematical model for analyzing the sustainability of the development of an enterprise in the fuel and energy complex, integrated into an information management system. It is noted that one of the strategic dominants in achieving the national goal of accelerating the technological development of any country is to ensure the effective functioning of enterprises in the fuel and energy complex. It is substantiated that these enterprises represent the basis of the material life of society, thus, ensuring their sustainable development is a significant factor for the formation of the structure of sectoral and inter-sectoral industrial complexes. In order to analyze the sustainable development of enterprises, an integral indicator is proposed, the components of which are the vectors of production, organizational, economic, environmental and social characteristics. Due to the weak structure of some characteristics, to solve the problem of their synthesis with quantitatively defined indicators, it is proposed to use the mathematical apparatus of fuzzy logic. Weakly structured indicators are formally described by linguistic variables. To establish the dependence of the integral indicator of sustainable development on production, organizational, economic, environmental and social indicators, a fuzzy-logical model has been built, which makes it possible to use the knowledge of experts by constructing rules of fuzzy inference. The fuzzy logic model is implemented using MATLAB tools. On the constructed model, experiments were carried out to assess the impact of each of the local indicators of sustainable development of an enterprise on the integral indicator. The advantage of the constructed model is its adaptability to changes in the operating conditions of enterprises.
- fuel technology,
- energy enterprise,
- sustainable development,
- mathematical model,
- fuzzy logic
Citation: Alex Borodin, Elena Streltsova, Zahid Mamedov, Irina Yakovenko, Irina Mityshina, Artem Streltsov. Fuzzy-Logical model for analysis of sustainable development of fuel and energy complex enterprises[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 974-990. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023046

Related Papers:

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to build a mathematical model for analyzing the sustainability of the development of an enterprise in the fuel and energy complex, integrated into an information management system. It is noted that one of the strategic dominants in achieving the national goal of accelerating the technological development of any country is to ensure the effective functioning of enterprises in the fuel and energy complex. It is substantiated that these enterprises represent the basis of the material life of society, thus, ensuring their sustainable development is a significant factor for the formation of the structure of sectoral and inter-sectoral industrial complexes. In order to analyze the sustainable development of enterprises, an integral indicator is proposed, the components of which are the vectors of production, organizational, economic, environmental and social characteristics. Due to the weak structure of some characteristics, to solve the problem of their synthesis with quantitatively defined indicators, it is proposed to use the mathematical apparatus of fuzzy logic. Weakly structured indicators are formally described by linguistic variables. To establish the dependence of the integral indicator of sustainable development on production, organizational, economic, environmental and social indicators, a fuzzy-logical model has been built, which makes it possible to use the knowledge of experts by constructing rules of fuzzy inference. The fuzzy logic model is implemented using MATLAB tools. On the constructed model, experiments were carried out to assess the impact of each of the local indicators of sustainable development of an enterprise on the integral indicator. The advantage of the constructed model is its adaptability to changes in the operating conditions of enterprises.

References

[1]	Zadeh L (2015) Fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Syst Soft Comp 10: 7–22.
[2]	Temkin IO, Klebanov DA, Deryabin SA, et al. (2020) Construction of an intelligent geoinformation system of a mining enterprise using predictive analytic methods. MIAB 3: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-3-0-114-125 doi: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-3-0-114-125
[3]	Temkin I, Klebanov D (2014) Intelligent control systems of mining transport complexes: Current state, tasks and solution mechanisms. MIAB 1: 257–266.
[4]	Temkin I, Kulyanitsa A, Deryabin S (2017) Computational models of interaction of autonomous mobile agents of the transport complex of mining enterprises. Infor Space 2: 65–70.
[5]	Varichev A, Kretov S, Ismagilov R, et al. (2016) An integrated approach to intelligent control systems for mining production. Min Ind 3: 4–7.
[6]	Volkova E, Druzhinin A, Poluzadov V, et al. (2016) Mining enterprise management based on a multi-agent approach. Universum: Tech Sci 10: 11–15.
[7]	Galiyev S, Samenov G, Zhusupov K, et al. (2016) Conception of automated management of geotechnological complex on an innovative base. 24th World Mining Congress Proceedings, Rio de Janeiro IBRAM: 96–107.
[8]	Wang CN, Nguyen VT, Thai HTN, et al. (2018) Sustainable supplier selection process in edible oil production by a hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and green data envelopment analysis for the SMEs food processing industry. Mathematics 6: 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120302 doi: 10.3390/math6120302
[9]	Cavallaro V, Dansero E (1998) Sustainable development: Global or local? GeoJournal 45: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006994703248 doi: 10.1023/A:1006994703248
[10]	Chan R, Shimou Y (1999) Urbanization and sustainable metropolitan development in China: Patterns, problems and prospects. GeoJournal 49: 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007190305381 doi: 10.1023/A:1007190305381
[11]	Davies W (1997) Sustainable development and urban policy: Hijacking the term in Calgary. GeoJournal 43: 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006828423352 doi: 10.1023/A:1006828423352
[12]	Manshard W (1990) New global environment programmes and sustainable development—A geographical perspective. GeoJournal 20: 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196743 doi: 10.1007/BF00196743
[13]	Preu C, Engelbrecht C (1994) Background, conceptual structure and organizational-administrative establishing of a "sustainable development strategy" for coral islands. GeoJournal 33: 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806426 doi: 10.1007/BF00806426
[14]	Roblek V, Thorpe O, Bach MP, et al. (2020) The fourth industrial revolution and the sustainability practices: A comparative automated content analysis approach of theory and practice. Sustainability 12: 8497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208497 doi: 10.3390/su12208497
[15]	Aparicio S, Turro A, Noguera M (2020) Entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in social, sustainable and economic development: Opportunities and challenges for future research. Sustainability 12: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218958 doi: 10.3390/su12218958
[16]	Renko S (2018) The concept of sustainable development. The Sustainable Marketing Concept in European SMEs, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-038-520180003
[17]	Mohrman SA, Winby S (2018) Working toward sustainable development: Consulting to the Eco-system. Research in Organizational Change and Development, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. 26: 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620180000026001
[18]	Zabelina I, Delyuga A (2019) Geoecological indicators of sustainable development: Spatial analysis. Sustainable Dev Mount Terr 11: 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21177/1998-4502-2019-11-1-15-25 doi: 10.21177/1998-4502-2019-11-1-15-25
[19]	Nurunnabi M, Esquer J, Munguia N, et al. (2020) Reaching the sustainable development goals 2030: Energy efficiency as an approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR). GeoJournal 85: 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-09965-x doi: 10.1007/s10708-018-09965-x
[20]	Rylnikova M (2020) Harmonious development of the mining industry, science and higher mining education—A guarantee of sustainable development of mining regions of Russia. Sustainable Dev Mount Terr 12: 154–161. https://doi.org/10.21177/1998-4502-2020-12-1-154-161 doi: 10.21177/1998-4502-2020-12-1-154-161
[21]	Singla A, Ahuja IS, Sethi AS (2019) An examination of effectiveness of technology push strategies for achieving sustainable development in manufacturing industries. J Sci Technol Policy Manage 10: 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2017-0048 doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-10-2017-0048
[22]	Latysheva O, Rovenska V, Smyrnova I, et al. (2020) Management of the sustainable development of machine-building enterprises: A sustainable development space approach. J Enterprise Inf Manage 34: 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0419 doi: 10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0419
[23]	Prokofieva EN (2012) Increasing the level of organizational stability of mining enterprises on the basis of technical and economic audit. Moscow State Mining University, 127.
[24]	Nechaev V, Vasilyeva N, Fetisov S (2010) Assessment of sustainable development of the agricultural sector. Econ Russia 2: 52–63.
[25]	Gogol DA (2011) Problems of financial stability of a commercial bank and methods of its assessment. Bull Volg State Univer Ser 3: Econ Ecol 3: 163–166.
[26]	Khomyachenkova N (2010) Methodology of multicriteria classification of industrial enterprises by groups of sustainable development. Bul Tver State Univer 37: 81–86.
[27]	Shokhnekh AV (2012) Mathematical methods for assessing the economic security of business entities. Manage Econ Syst: Elect Sci J 6: 1–13.
[28]	Averina OI, Gudkova DD (2016) Analysis and assessment of sustainable development of the enterprise. Act Prob Human Nat Sci 1–3: 10–19.
[29]	Schmidt AV (2011) Essence and indicators of economic stability of industrial enterprises. Bus Edu Right 3: 55–66.
[30]	Novoselov A, Potravny I, Novoselova I (2020) Sustainable development of the arctic indigenous communities: The approach to projects optimization of mining company. Sustainability 12: 7963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197963 doi: 10.3390/su12197963
[31]	Böhm M, Barkmann J, Eggert S, et al. (2020) Quantitative modelling and perspective-taking: Two competencies of decision making for sustainable development. Sustainability 12: 6980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176980 doi: 10.3390/su12176980
[32]	Rabe M, Streimikiene D, Bilan Y (2019) The concept of risk and possibilities of application of mathematical methods in supporting decision making for sustainable energy development. Sustainability 11: 1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041018 doi: 10.3390/su11041018
[33]	Kretova NA (2014) Methods for managing the stability of a commercial bank. Fin Credit 30: 33–43.
[34]	Kurlenya M, Baryshnikov V, Gakhova L (2012) Development of an experimental-analytical method for assessing the stability of mine workings. Phys Tech Prob Mineral Res Dev 4: 20–28.
[35]	Yashin S, Soldatova Y (2012) Assessment of the sustainability of innovative development of enterprises. Fin Credit 32: 9–16.
[36]	Popova EV, Kumratova AM, Chikatueva LA (2013) Development stability of the agricultural sector: A complex of mathematical methods and models. Polyth Network Elect Sci J Kuban St Agrar Univer 90: 794–809.
[37]	Orlov AI (2014) A new approach to the study of the stability of inferences in mathematical models. Polyth Network Elect Sci J Kuban St Agrar Univer 100: 1–30
[38]	Grishin KA (2020) Stability of systems with delay based on the second Lyapunov method. Bul Tula St Univer Tech Sci 9: 9–14.
[39]	Rakhmonov FN, Khamzaev AA, Istamov MF (2017) Study of the static stability of Navoi TPP by the method of Lyapunov functions in quadratic form Young Scientist. 43: 58–65.
[40]	Romm YE (2020) Modeling of Lyapunov stability based on transformations of difference solutions of ordinary differential equations. Math Model 12: 105–118.
[41]	Spirina SG, Kalaydin EN (2015) Financial stability of enterprises (corporations) according to Lyapunov. In the collection: Actual problems of economic theory and practice. Kuban St Univer, 148–153.
[42]	Biryukov YM (2010) Study of the sustainability of the development of regional economic systems. Microecon 6: 100–109.
[43]	Bolsherotov AL (2011) Mathematical methods for ensuring the conditions for the stability of ecosystems under the technogenic impact of construction on the environment. MGSU Bul 4: 454–459.
[44]	Kibitkin AI, Chechurina MN (2011) Conceptual approach to assessing the innovative development of an enterprise. Bul Murmansk St Tech Univer 1: 427–434.
[45]	Debunov LN (2017) Application of artificial neural networks in modeling the financial stability of an enterprise. Business Inf 9: 112–118.
[46]	Selyutin M (2001) Diagnostics of the financial stability of an enterprise based on a neural network. Proc VI Kuibyshev 129: 247–249.
[47]	Borodin A, Mityushin I, Streltsova E, et al. (2021) Mathematical modeling for financial analysis of an enterprise: Motivating of not open innovation. J Open Innovation: Technol Market Complexity 7: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010079 doi: 10.3390/joitmc7010079
[48]	Ziyadin S, Streltsova E, Borodin A, et al. (2019) Fuzzy logic approach in the modeling of sustainable tourism development management. Polish J Manage Stud 1: 492–504. http://doi.org/10.17512/PJMS.2019.19.1.37 doi: 10.17512/PJMS.2019.19.1.37
[49]	Ziyadin S, Streltsova E, Borodin A, et al (2019) Assessment of investment attractiveness of projects on the basis of environmental factors. Sustainability 11: 2544. http://doi.org/10.3390/SU11092544 doi: 10.3390/SU11092544
[50]	Efanova NV, Vaschenko VR (2019) The use of fuzzy logic methods in assessing the financial stability of an enterprise. Voronezh St Agrar Univer Bul 3: 206–212.
[51]	Abgaryan M (2011) Construction of a fuzzy model for assessing the financial stability of an enterprise. Mining Inf Analyt Bul (Sci Tech J) 6: 26–33.
[52]	Khnyreva ES (2019) Evaluation of the crisis resistance of an enterprise with weak dynamics using fuzzy logic. Bul Samara Sci Center Rus Academy Sci 2: 144–152.
[53]	Abbasov A, Streltsova E, Borodin A, et al. (2022) Mathematical modeling of fiscal innovations based on the interdisciplinary synthesis of fuzzy logic and automata theory. Azerbaijan J Math 12: 2–29.
[54]	Streltsova E, Borodin A, Yakovenko I (2022) Fuzzy-logic model for feasibility study of project implementation: Project's investment risk. Iranian J Fuzzy Syst 19: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2022.6784 doi: 10.22111/IJFS.2022.6784
[55]	Abbasov A, Mamedov Z, Tvaronavičienė M, et al. (2022) Estimation and prediction dynamics of the spread of the coronavirus infection using minimax approximation criterion and polynomial splines. Appl Comput Math 21: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.30546/1683-6154.21.1.2022.101 doi: 10.30546/1683-6154.21.1.2022.101

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)