Offshore floating photovoltaic system energy returns assessment—A life cycle energy analysis-based perspective

Ching-Feng CHEN; Ching-Feng CHEN

doi:10.3934/energy.2023028

AIMS Energy

2023, Volume 11, Issue 3: 540-554. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023028

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Offshore floating photovoltaic system energy returns assessment—A life cycle energy analysis-based perspective

Ching-Feng CHEN ^,

Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Received: 18 October 2022 Revised: 06 April 2023 Accepted: 19 April 2023 Published: 09 June 2023

Researchers have long regarded photovoltaics (PV) as a poor energy return (ER) compared to fossil fuels. Although the latter's energy-return-on-investment (EROI), like oil, coal, and gas, are above 25:1 at the primary, they are about 6:1 at the final stage. Following the technology creation, it is essential to investigate whether the solar module technology innovation affects the ER. Much literature delivers the ERs of fossil fuels and PV. However, it does not address the life cycle analysis or life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) assessments. This paper, employing time-series and LCEA analyses, performs an ER evaluation of the 181-MWp global most extensive offshore floating PV (OFPV) in a 30-year life cycle at Changhua Coastal Industrial Park, Taiwan. The results show that the energy payback time (EPBT) is about one year. The EROI is about 29.8, which is superior or complies with the upper limits of previous studies under the same insolation. The approach proposed in this study should help future PV stations' ER analysis and clarify whether the innovation benefits from improving the system's performance. The results also assist in investors' decision-making regarding deploying PV projects in the future.
- energy return,
- energy return on investment,
- life cycle analysis,
- life cycle energy analysis,
- offshore floating photovoltaics,
- energy payback time
Citation: Ching-Feng CHEN. Offshore floating photovoltaic system energy returns assessment—A life cycle energy analysis-based perspective[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(3): 540-554. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023028

Related Papers:

Abstract

Researchers have long regarded photovoltaics (PV) as a poor energy return (ER) compared to fossil fuels. Although the latter's energy-return-on-investment (EROI), like oil, coal, and gas, are above 25:1 at the primary, they are about 6:1 at the final stage. Following the technology creation, it is essential to investigate whether the solar module technology innovation affects the ER. Much literature delivers the ERs of fossil fuels and PV. However, it does not address the life cycle analysis or life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) assessments. This paper, employing time-series and LCEA analyses, performs an ER evaluation of the 181-MWp global most extensive offshore floating PV (OFPV) in a 30-year life cycle at Changhua Coastal Industrial Park, Taiwan. The results show that the energy payback time (EPBT) is about one year. The EROI is about 29.8, which is superior or complies with the upper limits of previous studies under the same insolation. The approach proposed in this study should help future PV stations' ER analysis and clarify whether the innovation benefits from improving the system's performance. The results also assist in investors' decision-making regarding deploying PV projects in the future.

References

[1]	Brockway PE, Owen A, Brand-Correa LI, et al. (2019) Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nature Energy 4: 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z
[2]	Bhandari KP, Collier JM, Ellingson RJ, et al. (2015) Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 47: 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057
[3]	Gessert TA (2012) Cadmium telluride photovoltaic thin film: CdTe. Compr Renewable Energy 1: 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00122-0 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00122-0
[4]	Murphy DJ, Hall CAS (2010) Year in review EROI or energy return on (Energy) invested. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1185:102–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05282.x doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05282.x
[5]	Atlason R, Unnthorsson R (2014) Ideal EROI (energy return on investment) deepens the understanding of energy systems. Energy 67: 301–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.096 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.096
[6]	Weißbach D, Ruprecht G, Huke A, et al. (2013) Energy intensity, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity-generating power plants. Energy 43: 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.029 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.029
[7]	Fukurozaki SH, Zilles R, Luís I, et al. (2013) Energy payback time and CO₂ emissions of 1.2 kWp photovoltaic roof-top system in Brazil. Smart Grid Clean Energy 2: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.12720/sgce.2.2.164-169
[8]	Alsema EA, Frankl P, Kato K (1998) Energy payback time of photovoltaic energy systems: Present status and prospects.
[9]	Louwen A, Sark VAN WGJHM, Schropp REI, et al. (2015) Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy payback time of current and prospective silicon heterojunction solar cell designs. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 23: 1406–1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2540 doi: 10.1002/pip.2540
[10]	Kamal M, Rabaia H, Semeraro C, et al. (2022) Recent progress towards photovoltaics' circular economy. J Cleaner Prod, 373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133864
[11]	Jackson A, Jackson T (2021) Modelling energy transition risk: The impact of declining energy return on investment (EROI). Ecol Econ 185: 107023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107023 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107023
[12]	Grant C, Garcia J, Hicks A (2020) Environmental payback periods of multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaics in the United States—How prioritizing based on environmental impact compares to solar intensity. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100723
[13]	Daniela-Abigail HL, Tariq R, Mekaoui Amina ElA, et al. (2022) Does recycling solar panels make this renewable resource sustainable? Evidence supported by environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Sustainable Cities Soc, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103539
[14]	Liu C, Zhang Q, Lei MZ, et al. (2022) Employing benefit-sharing to motivate stakeholders' efficient investment in waste photovoltaic module recycling. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101877
[15]	Wang C, Zhang L, Chang Y, et al. (2021) Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 137: 110652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110652 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110652
[16]	Zhou Z, Carbajales-Dale M (2018) Assessing the photovoltaic technology landscape: efficiency and energy return on investment (EROI). Energy Environ Sci 11: 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE01806A doi: 10.1039/C7EE01806A
[17]	Gagnon N, Hall CAS, Brinker LA (2009) Preliminary investigation of energy return on energy 487 investment for global oil and gas production. Energies 2: 490–503. https://doi.org/10.3390/en20300490 doi: 10.3390/en20300490
[18]	Hall CAS, Lambert JG, Balogh SB (2014) EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64: 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049
[19]	Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett 12: 074030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
[20]	Choi Y (2014) A study on power generation analysis of floating PV system considering environmental impact. Int J Software Eng Appl 8: 75–84. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijseia.2014.8.1.07 doi: 10.14257/ijseia.2014.8.1.07
[21]	Trapani K, Santafé M (2014) A review of floating photovoltaic installations: 2007–2013. Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 23: 530–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2466 doi: 10.1002/pip.2466
[22]	Singh C, Kim Y (1988) An efficient technique for reliability analysis of power systems including time-dependent sources. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3: 1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.14567 doi: 10.1109/59.14567
[23]	Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs. Energy Technology Research and Development White Paper 2007. Available from (In Chinese): https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw (retrieved on September 30, 2022).
[24]	Sahu A, Yadav N, Sudhakar K (2016) Floating photovoltaic power plant: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 66: 815–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.051 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.051
[25]	Gurfude SS, Kulkarni PS (2019) Energy yield of tracking type floating solar PV plant. In 2019 National Power Electronics Conference (NPEC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. https://doi.org/10.1109/npec47332.2019.9034846
[26]	Ali M, Gupta SM (2010) Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. J Environ Manage 91: 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037
[27]	Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2014) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527655625
[28]	Klöpffer W (2014) Introducing life cycle assessment and its presentation in LCA compendium. In: Klöpffer W (Ed.) Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment, Springer, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_1
[29]	Cromratie Clemons SK, Salloum CR, Herdegen KG, et al. (2021) Life cycle assessment of a floating photovoltaic system and feasibility for application in Thailand. Renewable Energy 168: 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.082 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.082
[30]	Huberman N, Pearlmutter D (2008) A lifecycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy Build 40: 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.06.002
[31]	Fay R, Treloar G, Iyer-Raniga U (2000) Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study. Build Res Inf 28: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100369073 doi: 10.1080/096132100369073
[32]	Menzies GF, Turan S, Banfill PF (2007) Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: A review. Proc Inst Civ Eng Constr Mater 160: 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2007.160.4.135 doi: 10.1680/coma.2007.160.4.135
[33]	Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK (2010) Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy Build 42: 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007
[34]	NRMRL Staff. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). EPA.gov. Washington, DC. EPA. National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) March 6, 2012. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120306122239/http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/lca/lca.html.
[35]	Water Resources Agency. Available from: https://www.wrasb.gov.tw (In Chinese) (retrieved on September 18, 2022).
[36]	Bureau of Standards and Inspection, Ministry of Economic Affairs. Technical Specifications for high-efficiency solar modules in Taiwan (2016).
[37]	Motech Industries, Inc. Available from: (In Chinese): https://www.motech.com.tw/modules-1.php (retrieved on September 18, 2022).
[38]	Huffman DL, Antelme F (2009) Availability analysis of a solar power system with graceful degradation. In: Proceedings of the Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Fort Worth, TX. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914701
[39]	Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13: 245–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187 doi: 10.2307/1907187
[40]	Kendall MG (1975) Rank Correlation Methods, Griffin, London. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID = 2099295.
[41]	Salas JD (1993) Analysis and modeling of hydrologic time series. In Handbook of Hydrology, Maidment DR, McGraw-Hill: New York, 19.1-1302. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID = 1186482.
[42]	Box GEP, Jenkins G M, Reinsel GC (1994) Time Series Analysis; Forecasting and Control, Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, New Jersey. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID = 1936224.
[43]	Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs. Available from (In Chinese): https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/iphw/changpin/#open-modal. (retrieved on October 10, 2022).
[44]	Staebler DL, Wronski CR (1977) Reversible conductivity changes in discharge‐produced amorphous Si. Appl Phys Lett 31: 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.89674 doi: 10.1063/1.89674
[45]	Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012
[46]	Motech Industries, Inc. Available from (In Chinese): https://www.motech.com.tw/green.php.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)