Research article Special Issues

Modelling and development of sustainable energy systems

  • Received: 28 December 2022 Revised: 27 February 2023 Accepted: 01 March 2023 Published: 13 March 2023
  • Due to the recent climate change, organizations all over the globe are developing plans for reducing carbon emissions by developing clean energy technologies and energy efficient devices. However, the path for transition to green energy system is still unclear and in general, the representation of green energy supply for transition pathways is limited. Therefore, this study outlines a plan for getting Swedish energy sector completely carbon neutral by 2050. The approach can also be applicable to the majority of nations worldwide. Computer based simulations are performed on Energy PLAN software for making clean, green and sustainable energy system that can balance every component of entire energy system during the study period 2022 to 2050. This study takes into account the sustainable use of renewable sources for all economic sectors as well as the interchange of energy with nearby nations under the two scenarios. Additionally, the energy system works in tandem with other industries to create a fully carbon-free environment. The results revealed that, 50% de-carbonization is possible till 2035 and 100% de-carbonization is possible till 2050. This enables a discussion of how ambitious 10-year goals might serve as a first step toward the mid-century elimination of fossil fuels from the energy sector.

    Citation: Muhammad Amir Raza, M. M. Aman, Abdul Ghani Abro, Muhammad Shahid, Darakhshan Ara, Tufail Ahmed Waseer, Mohsin Ali Tunio, Shakir Ali Soomro, Nadeem Ahmed Tunio, Raza Haider. Modelling and development of sustainable energy systems[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(2): 256-270. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023014

    Related Papers:

  • Due to the recent climate change, organizations all over the globe are developing plans for reducing carbon emissions by developing clean energy technologies and energy efficient devices. However, the path for transition to green energy system is still unclear and in general, the representation of green energy supply for transition pathways is limited. Therefore, this study outlines a plan for getting Swedish energy sector completely carbon neutral by 2050. The approach can also be applicable to the majority of nations worldwide. Computer based simulations are performed on Energy PLAN software for making clean, green and sustainable energy system that can balance every component of entire energy system during the study period 2022 to 2050. This study takes into account the sustainable use of renewable sources for all economic sectors as well as the interchange of energy with nearby nations under the two scenarios. Additionally, the energy system works in tandem with other industries to create a fully carbon-free environment. The results revealed that, 50% de-carbonization is possible till 2035 and 100% de-carbonization is possible till 2050. This enables a discussion of how ambitious 10-year goals might serve as a first step toward the mid-century elimination of fossil fuels from the energy sector.



    加载中


    [1] Khatri KL, Muhammad AR, Soomro SA, et al. (2021) Investigation of possible solid waste power potential for distributed generation development to overcome the power crises of Karachi city. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 143: 110882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110882 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110882
    [2] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Hussain A (2022) Transition from fossilized to defossilized energy system in Pakistan. Renewable Energy 190: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.059 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.059
    [3] Zheng J, Mi Z, Coffman DM, et al. (2019) Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Econ 81: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003
    [4] Müller DB, Liu G, Løvik AN, et al. (2013) Carbon emissions of infrastructure development. Environ Sci Technol 47: 11739–11746. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402618m doi: 10.1021/es402618m
    [5] Huisingh D, Zhang Z, Moore JC, et al. (2015) Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. J Cleaner Prod 103: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.098 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.098
    [6] Dobravec V, Matak N, Sakulin C, et al. (2021) Multilevel governance energy planning and policy: A view on local energy initiatives. Energy Sustainability Society 11: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00277-y doi: 10.1186/s13705-020-00277-y
    [7] Stober D, Suškevičs M, Eiter S, et al. (2021) What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects. Energy Res Social Sci 71: 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804 doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804
    [8] Cheshmehzangi A (2021) Low carbon transition at the township level: Feasibility study of environmental pollutants and sustainable energy planning. Int J Sustainable Energy 40: 670–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1860042 doi: 10.1080/14786451.2020.1860042
    [9] Bouw K, Noorman KJ, Wiekens CJ, et al. (2021) Local energy planning in the built environment: An analysis of model characteristics. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 144: 111030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111030 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111030
    [10] Ezbakhe F, Pérez-Foguet A (2021) Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty. European J Operat Res 291: 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.037 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.037
    [11] Ratanakuakangwan S, Morita H (2022) An efficient energy planning model optimizing cost, emission, and social impact with different carbon tax scenarios. Appl Energy 325: 119792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119792 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119792
    [12] Ratanakuakangwan S, Morita H (2022) Measuring the efficiency of energy planning under uncertainty. Energy Rep 8: 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.164 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.164
    [13] Chang M, Thellufsen JZ, Zakeri B, et al. (2021) Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition. Appl Energy 290: 116731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116731 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116731
    [14] Jäger-Waldau A, Kougias I, Taylor N, et al. (2020) How photovoltaics can contribute to GHG emission reductions of 55% in the EU by 2030. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 126: 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109836 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109836
    [15] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Rafique K, et al. (2021) Harnessing electrical power from hybrid biomass-solid waste energy resources for microgrids in underdeveloped and developing countries. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 11: 7257–7261. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4177 doi: 10.48084/etasr.4177
    [16] Palconit EV, Villanueva JR, Enano N, et al. (2021) Resource assessment of tidal stream power in Pakiputan Strait, Davao Gulf, Philippines. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 11: 7233–7239. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3853 doi: 10.48084/etasr.3853
    [17] Perez-Sindin XS, Lee J, Nielsen T (2022) Exploring the spatial characteristics of energy injustice: A comparison of the power generation landscapes in Spain, Denmark, and South Korea. Energy Res Social Sci 91: 102682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102682 doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102682
    [18] Hainoun A, Aldin MS, Almoustafa S (2010) Formulating an optimal long-term energy supply strategy for Syria using MESSAGE model. Energy Policy 38: 1701–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.032 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.032
    [19] Bouckaert S, Mazauric V, Maïzi N (2014) Expanding renewable energy by implementing demand response. Energy Procedia 61: 1844–1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.226 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.226
    [20] Ma X, Chai M, Luo L, et al. (2015) An assessment on Shanghai's energy and environment impacts of using MARKAL model. J Renewable Sustainable Energy 7: 013105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905468 doi: 10.1063/1.4905468
    [21] Child M, Nordling A, Breyer C (2017) Scenarios for a sustainable energy system in the Åland Islands in 2030. Energy Conversion Manage 137: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.039 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.039
    [22] Hong JH, Kim J, Son W, et al. (2019) Long-term energy strategy scenarios for South Korea: Transition to a sustainable energy system. Energy Policy 127: 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.055 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.055
    [23] Mirjat NH, Uqaili MA, Harijan K, et al. (2018) Long-term electricity demand forecast and supply side scenarios for Pakistan (2015–2050): A LEAP model application for policy analysis. Energy 165: 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.012
    [24] Felver TB (2020) How can Azerbaijan meet its Paris Agreement commitments: assessing the effectiveness of climate change-related energy policy options using LEAP modeling. Heliyon 6: e04697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04697
    [25] Lei Y, Lu X, Shi M, et al. (2019) SWOT analysis for the development of photovoltaic solar power in Africa in comparison with China. Environ Impact Assessm Rev 77: 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.005
    [26] Sáez de Cámara E, Fernández I, Castillo-Eguskitza N (2021) A holistic approach to integrate and evaluate sustainable development in higher education. The case study of the University of the Basque Country. Sustainability 13: 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010392 doi: 10.3390/su13010392
    [27] Krey V, O'Neill BC, van Ruijven B, et al. (2012) Urban and rural energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in Asia. Energy Econ 34: S272–S283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.013
    [28] Tanoto Y, Wijaya ME (2011) Economic and environmental emissions analysis in Indonesian electricity expansion planning: Low-rank coal and geothermal energy utilization scenarios; 2011. IEEE, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/CET.2011.6041459
    [29] Pronińska K, Księżopolski K (2021) Baltic offshore wind energy development—poland's public policy tools analysis and the geostrategic implications. Energies 14: 4883. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164883 doi: 10.3390/en14164883
    [30] Dominković DF, Bačeković I, Ćosić B, et al. (2016) Zero carbon energy system of South East Europe in 2050. Appl Energy 184: 1517–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.046 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.046
    [31] Mallah S, Bansal N (2010) Allocation of energy resources for power generation in India: Business as usual and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 38: 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.058 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.058
    [32] Koukouzas N, Tyrologou P, Karapanos D, et al. (2021) Carbon capture, utilisation and storage as a defense tool against climate change: Current developments in West Macedonia (Greece). Energies 14: 3321. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113321 doi: 10.3390/en14113321
    [33] Østergaard PA (2015) Reviewing EnergyPLAN simulations and performance indicator applications in EnergyPLAN simulations. Appl Energy 154: 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.086 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.086
    [34] Dahlquist E, Thorin E, Yan J (2007) Alternative pathways to a fossil-fuel free energy system in the Mälardalen region of Sweden. Int J Energy Res 31: 1226–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1330 doi: 10.1002/er.1330
    [35] Ahmed S, Nguyen T (2022) Analysis of future carbon-neutral energy system—The case of Växjö Municipality, Sweden. Smart Energy 7: 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2022.100082 doi: 10.1016/j.segy.2022.100082
    [36] Shahbaz MS, Kazi AG, Othman B, et al. (2019) Identification, assessment and mitigation of environment side risks for Malaysian manufacturing. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 9: 3851–3857. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2529 doi: 10.48084/etasr.2529
    [37] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Haque MIU, et al. (2022) Holistic and scientific approach to the development of sustainable energy policy framework for energy security in Pakistan. Energy Rep 8: 4282–4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.044 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.044
    [38] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Hussain A, et al. (2022) Sector-Wise optimal energy demand forecasting for a developing country using LEAP software. Eng Proc 20: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022020006 doi: 10.3390/engproc2022020006
    [39] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Israr A, et al. (2022) Energy demand and production forecasting in Pakistan. Energy Strat Rev 39: 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100788 doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100788
    [40] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Akbar S, et al. (2021) Towards improving technical performance of a 747 MW thermal power plant. Quaid-E-Awam Uni Res J Eng Sci Technol Nawabshah 19: 104–111. https://doi.org/10.52584/QRJ.1901.15 doi: 10.52584/QRJ.1901.15
    [41] Raza MA, Khatri KL, Memon MA, et al. (2022) Exploitation of Thar coal field for power generation in Pakistan: A way forward to sustainable energy future. Energy Explorat Exploitat. 40: 1173–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987221082190 doi: 10.1177/01445987221082190
    [42] Østergaard PA, Lund H, Thellufsen JZ, et al. (2022) Review and validation of EnergyPLAN. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev. 168: 112724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112724 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112724
    [43] Shehu E (2021) Long-term sustainable energy plan to reduce air pollution in the Republic of Moldova. ITEGAM-JETIA 7: 72–77. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v7i28.737 doi: 10.5935/jetia.v7i28.737
    [44] Yan Z, Zhang Y, Liang R, et al. (2020) An allocative method of hybrid electrical and thermal energy storage capacity for load shifting based on seasonal difference in district energy planning. Energy 207: 118139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118139 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118139
    [45] Sorknæs P, Lund H, Skov I, et al. (2020) Smart Energy Markets-Future electricity, gas and heating markets. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 119: 109655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109655 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109655
    [46] Raza MA, Aman MM, Abro AG, et al. (2022) Challenges and potentials of implementing a smart grid for Pakistan's electric network. Energy Strategy Rev 43: 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100941 doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100941
    [47] Qureshi AH, Raza MA, Aman M, et al. (2022) Energy Demand Projection and Economy Nexus of Pakistan. Quaid-E-Awam Uni Res J Eng Sci Technol Nawabshah 20: 138–144. https://doi.org/10.52584/QRJ.2001.17 doi: 10.52584/QRJ.2001.17
    [48] Zhao J, Sinha A, Inuwa N, et al. (2022) Does structural transformation in economy impact inequality in renewable energy productivity? Implications for sustainable development. Renewable Energy 189: 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.050 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.050
    [49] Abbasi KR, Adedoyin FF, Abbas J, et al. (2021) The impact of energy depletion and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Thailand: fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulation. Renewable Energy 180: 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.078 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.078
    [50] Koondhar MA, Aziz N, Tan Z, et al. (2021) Green growth of cereal food production under the constraints of agricultural carbon emissions: A new insights from ARDL and VECM models. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 47: 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101452 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101452
    [51] Raza MA, Aman MM, Rajpar AH, et al. (2022) Towards achieving 100% renewable energy supply for sustainable climate change in Pakistan. Sustainability 14: 16547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416547 doi: 10.3390/su142416547
    [52] Iqbal N, Abbasi KR, Shinwari R, et al. (2021) Does exports diversification and environmental innovation achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies? J Environ Manage 291: 112648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648
    [53] Zhou R, Abbasi KR, Salem S, et al. (2022) Do natural resources, economic growth, human capital, and urbanization affect the ecological footprint? A modified dynamic ARDL and KRLS approach. Res Policy 78: 102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102782 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102782
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1594) PDF downloads(159) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog