Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Age (years) | 72.03 | 7.03 | 72.62 | 7.75 |
Weight (kg) | 70.10 | 13.10 | 76.15 | 11.14 |
Height (m) | 1.54 | 0.04 | 1.66 | 0.06 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.44 | 5.73 | 27.57 | 3.56 |
The continuous increase of energy consumption resulted in the unavoidable increase in demand for renewable energy (RE) investment projects in recent years. Although the necessity of developing alternative energy sources is clear, the government cannot afford the huge investment in RE investment projects without private sector participation. Therefore, analyzing the decision-making procedure from the investor's point of view is essential to improve this process. Numerous studies in the literature developed various multi-criteria decision-making approaches using expert's judgments to provide informed decisions on RE investment projects. While prior efforts are valuable, accounting heterogeneity impact with regard to experts' background and knowledge on results has not been examined. Therefore, this study aims to develop a modified decision-making approach in RE projects using an analytical hierarchy process to: (1) provide a comprehensive review of investors criteria in RE projects; (2) evaluate how the level of expertise of experts in RE subject has an impact on the achieved common solution; and (3) determine the best RE alternative in different scenarios. Then, Iran, as a case study is selected to illustrate the model practicability. The results indicate that those who have higher expertise in the subject are more concerned about the "consumption market", and "government supportive policies". Whereas economic factors remain the most challenging criteria in less expert participation views. Both groups chose 'wind energy' as the best alternative energy source for investment based on current Iran's energy market. It is anticipated that the developed methodology and its results can be used by (1) government and public agencies to understand the investors' concerns; (2) investors to make a more-informed risk-based decision in RE projects or other complex decision-making projects.
Citation: Abdolmajid Erfani, Mehdi Tavakolan, Ali Hassandokht Mashhadi, Pouria Mohammadi. Heterogeneous or homogeneous? A modified decision-making approach in renewable energy investment projects[J]. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(3): 558-580. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021027
[1] | Clemens Drenowatz, Gerson Ferrari, Klaus Greier, Sitong Chen, Franz Hinterkörner . Physical fitness in Austrian elementary school children prior to and post-COVID-19. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 480-495. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023034 |
[2] | Lingming Chen, Elizabeth Procter-Gray, Qun Le, Danielle LoPilato, Marianella Ferretto, Kevin Kane, Marian T. Hannan, Sarah Berry, Wenjun Li . Gender differences in the associations of recreational walking with indoor and outdoor falls among older adults-the Healthy Aging and Neighborhood Study (HANS). AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 185-201. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025012 |
[3] | Felipe Montalva-Valenzuela, Antonio Castillo-Paredes, Claudio Farias-Valenzuela, Oscar Andrades-Ramirez, Yeny Concha-Cisternas, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz . Effects of exercise, physical activity, and sports on physical fitness in adults with Down syndrome: A systematic review. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 577-600. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024029 |
[4] | Erivelton Fernandes França, Michel Monteiro Macedo, Fernando Francisco Pazello Mafra, Gabrielle Mitico Miyake, Romildo Torres da Silva, Tania Regina de França, Thyago Ribeiro dos Santos, João Pedro da Silva Junior, Victor Keihan Rodrigues Matsudo, Nelson Morini Junior, Eduardo Natali Della Valentina, Fábio Dupart Nascimento, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes Martins . Back pain in elementary schoolchildren is related to screen habits. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 562-573. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020045 |
[5] | Anson Kwok Choi Li, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia . Relationships between employment status with self-perceived mental and physical health in Canada. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 236-257. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024012 |
[6] | Amy M. Gayman, Jessica Fraser-Thomas, Jamie E. L. Spinney, Rachael C. Stone, Joseph Baker . Leisure-time Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Older People: The Influence of Sport Involvement on Behaviour Patterns in Later Life. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(2): 171-188. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.2.171 |
[7] | Saleem Qureshi, Musarrat Iqbal, Azra Rafiq, Hamna Ahmed, Tooba Malik, Muhammad Nasir Kalam, Muhammad Abdullah, Qirtas Tauheed, Muhammad Daoud Butt . Dietary habits and physical activity patterns in relation to nutritional status among school-aged children in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(3): 553-567. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023039 |
[8] | Alexios Batrakoulis, Oscar L Veiga, Susana Franco, Ewan Thomas, Antonios Alexopoulos, Manel Valcarce-Torrente, Rita Santos-Rocha, Fatima Ramalho, Andrea Di Credico, Daniela Vitucci, Liliana Ramos, Vera Simões, Alejandro Romero-Caballero, Isabel Vieira, Annamaria Mancini, Antonino Bianco . Health and fitness trends in Southern Europe for 2023: A cross-sectional survey. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 378-408. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023028 |
[9] | Bee Leng Per, Anne W Taylor, Tiffany K Gill . Prescription medicines, over-the-counter medicines and complementary and alternative medicines use: a comparison between baby boomers and older South Australians. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(4): 380-395. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.380 |
[10] | Eftychia Ferentinou, Ioannis Koutelekos, Evangelos Dousis, Eleni Evangelou, Despoina Pappa, Maria Theodoratou, Chrysoula Dafogianni . The relationship between childhood sleep, emotional intelligence and Body Mass Index in school aged children. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 77-90. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025006 |
The continuous increase of energy consumption resulted in the unavoidable increase in demand for renewable energy (RE) investment projects in recent years. Although the necessity of developing alternative energy sources is clear, the government cannot afford the huge investment in RE investment projects without private sector participation. Therefore, analyzing the decision-making procedure from the investor's point of view is essential to improve this process. Numerous studies in the literature developed various multi-criteria decision-making approaches using expert's judgments to provide informed decisions on RE investment projects. While prior efforts are valuable, accounting heterogeneity impact with regard to experts' background and knowledge on results has not been examined. Therefore, this study aims to develop a modified decision-making approach in RE projects using an analytical hierarchy process to: (1) provide a comprehensive review of investors criteria in RE projects; (2) evaluate how the level of expertise of experts in RE subject has an impact on the achieved common solution; and (3) determine the best RE alternative in different scenarios. Then, Iran, as a case study is selected to illustrate the model practicability. The results indicate that those who have higher expertise in the subject are more concerned about the "consumption market", and "government supportive policies". Whereas economic factors remain the most challenging criteria in less expert participation views. Both groups chose 'wind energy' as the best alternative energy source for investment based on current Iran's energy market. It is anticipated that the developed methodology and its results can be used by (1) government and public agencies to understand the investors' concerns; (2) investors to make a more-informed risk-based decision in RE projects or other complex decision-making projects.
The increase in life expectancy worldwide has led to a steady increase in the number of people over 60 years of age [1]. It is projected that the percentage of the world's population over the age of 60 will nearly double from 12% to 22% between 2015 and 2050 [1]; in Chile, the older adult population will increase from 19.9% in 2017 to 21.6% in 2050 [2].
Aging is a biological, universal, individual, asynchronous, and natural process that causes morphophysiological changes in bodily systems [3]. At the muscular level, the loss of muscle mass and strength have been considered the main factors responsible for the deterioration of functionality in older people [4]. In fact, at present, the loss of muscle mass and strength are the main diagnostic criteria for the geriatric syndrome known as sarcopenia [5].
The appendicular muscle mass index (AMMI) is a measure of the muscle mass in the upper and lower limbs relative to height and can be calculated with indirect prediction models such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and bioimpedanciometry, as well as with double indirect models such as anthropometry [6]–[10].
Research has shown that AMMI measured by methods such as DXA, CT or bioimpedanciometry correlates with strength and function in the elderly [11],[12]. Tsukasaki et al. [12] compared the DXA and CT methods in the estimation of physical function variables such as grip strength, knee extension strength, leg extension power, and gait speed. These authors concluded that the correlation coefficient between physical function and the cross-sectional area (CSA) measured by CT was greater than the relationship found with the skeletal muscle mass derived by DXA for gait speed in men (p = 0.002) and knee extension strength in women (p = 0.03) [12]. Concerning bioimpedanciometry, a relationship has been reported between muscle mass and the knee extension strength (p < 0.01), though no relationship was found with the walking speed [11]. However, few studies have addressed this relationship with anthropometric methods. Understanding that evaluations by methods such as DXA, MRI, CT, and bioimpedanciometry in clinical practice are practically inaccessible and of a high economic cost [10], the assessment of the AMMI through anthropometric methods is of great interest.
Physical function is a critical part of the assessment of older people, both in clinical and research settings. To evaluate the physical function, traditional instruments measure the individual's ability to perform specific functional tasks such as walking or a chair stand [13]. Some of the most used tests to evaluate the physical function of older adults are the 5-chair stand test, the 3-meter walk test, and the timed up and go test (TUG), which measures the strength of the lower limb, the gait speed, and the dynamic balance, respectively [13],[14]. These assessments are clinically significant because of their ability to predict adverse health outcomes such as hospitalization, falls, institutionalization, disability, and mortality [13].
Given the relevance of physical function to the health of older people and the feasibility of evaluating muscle mass through anthropometric variables, this study aims to investigate the correlation between the AMMI and physical function in the elderly.
This was a cross-sectional study. The sample participants were selected under accidental non-probabilistic sampling and consisted of a total of 76 older people (40 women and 36 men) from the Maule region of Chile. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) individuals of both genders, aged between 65 and 80 years; b) those with a functional status indicating either self-employed or a self-employment risk as assessed by the Elderly Functional Assessment Measure (EFAM-Chile); and c) individuals scoring ≥14 points on the mini-mental test, signifying an optimal cognitive level. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a) being either institutionalized or hospitalized; b) using technical aids such as orthotics or prostheses for movement; c) participants diagnosed with vestibular disorders by a medical professional; d) those who had undergone surgical procedures within the six months preceding the study; and e) presence of pain, edema and/or inflammation at the time of evaluation.
All participants read and voluntarily signed an informed consent form based on the criteria and activities to which they were subjected. The research was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Santo Tomás, Chile (Number 18.20).
The AMMI of the Chilean older people was estimated using the equation proposed by Lera et al. (2014) [10]. The equation was used to estimate the appendicular muscle mass (AMM), which was later normalized by the height of the participants. The anthropometric methods proposed in the equation were weight, height, hip circumference, calf circumference, and knee height, which are detailed as follows:
AMM (kg) = 0.107 (weight in kg) + 0.251 (knee height in cm) + 0.197 (calf circumference in cm) + 0.047 (manual grip strength in kg) - 0.034 (hip circumference in cm) + 3.417 (male sex) - 0.020 (age in years) - 7.646.
Body weight was measured with a digital scale (Seca® Hamburg, Germany; precision of 1 kg). Height was assessed using a stadiometer (Seca® Hamburg, Germany; precision 0.1 cm) with the participant remaining in a bipedal position. To determine the hip and calf circumferences, an inextensible tape measure (Sanny®, Brazil; precision 0.1 mm) was used and the measurements were performed according to the protocol of the International Society for the Advancement of Kineanthropometry (ISAK) [15]. For the hip circumference, the participant had to be standing and the tape measure was placed parallel to the floor, at the level of the maximum circumference without compressing the soft tissues (buttocks). For the calf perimeter, the measurement was performed with the feet apart while distributing the weight on both feet, in which the maximum perimeter of the dominant leg was sought [15]. Knee height was measured using a wide-bladed knee caliper with the subject being seated; measurements were made on the left leg, placing the knee and leg at a 90-degree angle. The fixed part of the caliper was placed under the heel and the movable part was placed parallel to the fibula over the malleolus and immediately behind the fibula, thereby pressing the two blades together to compress the soft tissues [15].
Manual grip strength was assessed and included in the equation to determine the AMM. This test was evaluated using a dynamometer (Jamar® PC 5030 J1, Sammons Preston Rolyan, USA) on the dominant hand. The measurement was made with the participant seated, shoulders in abduction, elbow flexed at 90 degrees, with the forearm and wrist in a neutral position [16]. Then, they were asked to perform a maximal force with their dominant hand for 3 seconds, with a 1-minute rest between each repetition. Three measurements were taken, and the highest mark was recorded. Lera et al. (2014) [10] included the manual grip strength over other measures of physical function in their equation, since they considered it a strong predictor of mortality, disability, and institutionalization.
The result of the equation described above was normalized by dividing the AMM by the squared bipedal height, which corresponds to the AMMI; this final value was used in the analysis [10].
To assess the physical function of the elderly, we used the 5-chair stand-up and sit-down, 3-meter walk, and timed up and go (TUG) tests to determine the strength of the lower limb, the gait speed, and the dynamic balance, respectively [17]. The 5-chair stand-up and sit-down test (squats) consists of the person standing up and sitting down from a chair without armrests five times as fast as possible. The time (in seconds) it takes to perform the test is recorded [18]. The TUG test consists of measuring the time it takes the individual to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around walk back to the chair, and then sit down again [19]. Finally, the 3-meter walk test measures the time (in seconds) it takes the participant to walk three meters in a straight line at a normal pace. The test is assessed by measuring the speed in meters/second. All tests were performed three times, and the shortest time achieved in each test was considered.
The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) statistical software, V25.0, analyzed data at an a priori significance level of <0.05. The results were described using measures of central tendency, such as mean and standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was performed to determine the distribution of the data. A student's t-test for independent samples was performed to compare the characteristics of the participants age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). The Spearman's parametric test was used to determine the association between the AMMI and physical function. Based on the correlation coefficient (r-value), the relationships were interpreted as weak (0 to 0.39), moderate (0.4 to 0.69), and strong (0.7 to 1).
Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviation of age, weight, height, and BMI of the participants in this study. No significant differences were observed in the characteristics of the participants (p > 0.05).
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Age (years) | 72.03 | 7.03 | 72.62 | 7.75 |
Weight (kg) | 70.10 | 13.10 | 76.15 | 11.14 |
Height (m) | 1.54 | 0.04 | 1.66 | 0.06 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.44 | 5.73 | 27.57 | 3.56 |
Note: BMI: body mass index; SD: Standard deviation.
Table 2 shows the results of the AMMI and the functional tests performed on both men and women evaluated in this study. The comparison of the AMMI (p < 0.001), 5-chair stand test (p < 0.001), gait speed (p < 0.001), and TUG (p < 0.001) revealed significant differences between men and women.
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
AMMI (kg/m2) | 6.53 | 1.15 | 7.76 | 0.84 |
5-chair test (s) | 11.54 | 2.79 | 10.25 | 2.89 |
Gait speed (m/s) | 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.90 | 0.17 |
TUG (s) | 9.14 | 2.14 | 8.50 | 2.04 |
Note: AMMI: Appendicular muscle mass index; TUG: Time up and go test; SD: Standard deviation.
The results of the correlations indicate that the AMMI did not present a significant relationship with the 5-chair stand test in both the women (r = -0.135; p = 0.204) and men (r = -0.067; p = 0.349) evaluated (Figure 1). For the gait speed, it could be observed that there was a moderate correlation with the AMMI in women (r = 0.542; p < 0.001) and men (r = 0.556; p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Likewise, a statistical significance could be observed in the relationship between the AMMI with the TUG test in the women (r = -0.273; p = 0.047) and older men evaluated in this study (r = -0.284; p = 0.042) (Figure 3).
The objective of this study was to establish the relationship between the AMMI, assessed from anthropometric variables, and the physical function of older people. The results of our investigation indicate that there is a correlation between the AMMI and the physical function tests of gait speed and TUG in the older people evaluated. Similar to our findings, a positive correlation between muscle mass and gait speed has been previously observed [11],[20],[21]. Moreover, other studies has previously reported the relationship between muscle mass and the TUG test [20]–[22]. In addition, our research also revealed that there is no relationship between the AMMI and lower limb muscle strength assessed by the 5-chair stand test, which is a finding that contrasts with those found in previous studies [20]–[22]. Despite this, a trend is observed in our analysis, thereby suggesting that the higher the AMMI, the greater the muscle strength of the people evaluated in the squat test.
Some studies have shown that being able to get up from a chair is essential for independent living and that the performance of this action is strongly influenced by the ability of the lower limbs to exert a force by the muscle mass of the lower body [23]. Similarly, a study in an older Asian population found that in both men and women, knee extension strength showed significant positive correlations with the AMMI [11]. The discrepancy in the results obtained from other studies in the international literature could be attributed to the different evaluation methods used to obtain the AMMI (such as DXA, TC, and bioimpedanciometry), or to the different lower limb muscle strength assessment tests (such as 5-chair stand, knee extension, and manual grip) [11],[12]. While our research applied clinical tests to determine physical function, and a validated equation in the Chilean elderly population to obtain the AMM and the AMMI, other studies used objective but more expensive methods, such as DXA, MRI, or bioimpedanciometry [11],[24].
On the other hand, our research found a direct relationship between the AMMI and the gait speed test, in which people with greater muscle masses performed the test faster. Our findings are similar to those previously reported by Diaz-Villegas et al. [25] and Menant et al. [26], which found that muscle mass was a significant predictor of gait speed, independent of age and BMI [25],[26]. One possible explanation for these results is that a greater AMMI is associated with a greater functional independence and a better ability to perform daily life activities, such as walking and bending. In contrast, muscle weakness and atrophy of muscle fibers resulting from sarcopenia are associated with impaired physical function and higher rates of disability in older people [27]–[30].
In previous studies, the relationship found between muscle mass and physical condition were consistent in both sexes. For example, in both men and women, a significant relationship and similar correlation coefficients have been reported in tests such as lower extremity strength and hand grip strength [11],[12]. However, another study showed a relationship between muscle mass and gait speed only in men [12]. This differs from our findings, where we observed a moderate correlation in both sexes. The disparity in results might stem from our utilization of anthropometric estimates for assessing muscle mass, whereas other studies employed CT and DXA for measurements [12]. It has been postulated that gait speed could be considered the sixth vital sign to be evaluated in the elderly, since it correlates with parameters such as functional capacity, confidence, and balance, thereby allowing it to predict the future health status of individuals [31]. In this context, maintaining an adequate gait speed and an adequate muscle mass in the lower limbs is important to promote the functionality and autonomy of the elderly population [31].
Regarding the relationship between the AMMI and the TUG test, our results suggest that older people with a lower muscle strength in the lower extremities take longer to execute the TUG test. This finding is corroborated by previous studies, which have postulated that lower limb muscle mass, specifically weakness, is significantly related to the balance test performance [32].
Overall, our collective results are indicative of an age-associated deterioration in musculoskeletal function, as well as a substantial reduction in coordination and postural balance [3],[33]. These changes, along with alterations in sensory receptors, proprioception, visual, and vestibular function, impact postural control, the ability to maintain static and dynamic balance, and impair the ability to produce force, thereby increasing the risk of falling [3],[33].
As a secondary result, our research found significant differences in the AMMI between both sexes, in which men obtained a higher AMMI than women. Our finding coincides with what was previously reported by Bai et al. [34]. Regarding the functional tests, our study revealed that men presented better performances in the 5-chair stand, gait speed, and TUG tests, which is consistent with what was described by Okabe et al. [35]. This difference in physical function could be due to the higher AMMI reported in men and to the fact that the baseline characteristics of the participants (i.e., age, weight, height, and BMI) are homogeneous. Therefore, it is apparent that the main influencing factor on physical test performance was AMMI.
The strengths of our study are the measurement of physical function variables by means of nationally and internationally validated clinical tests, and the use of a valid, reliable, easy-to-obtain, and low-cost equation to predict the AMMI of older Chilean people. This undoubtedly positions it as a reproducible tool in clinical practice for identifying and screening people with low muscle mass and sarcopenia. In contrast, our research also has limitations, such as the small sample size and the convenience selection of participants, which restricts the external validity of the results and does not allow them to be generalized to the elderly Chilean population. Consequently, all conclusions from the results should be taken with caution.
The results of our research indicate that participants between 65 and 80 years of age with a higher AMMI present better functionality. Specifically, we observed a correlation between the AMMI and the gait speed and TUG in both women and men. Therefore, the AMMI emerges as a potential public health assessment by enabling the clinical quantification of muscle mass and an estimation of physical function in the elderly population. Additionally, we suggest their use in public health as a previously validated and reliable equation to predict the AMMI in older people. Likewise, it is easy assessment and low-cost clinical tool.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
[1] |
Heravi G, Salehi MM, Rostami M (2020) Identifying cost-optimal options for a typical residential nearly zero energy building's design in developing countries. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22: 2107-2128. doi: 10.1007/s10098-020-01962-4
![]() |
[2] |
Hansen K, Breyer C, Lund H (2019) Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems. Energy 175: 471-480. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.092
![]() |
[3] |
Houri Jafari H, Vakili A, Eshraghi H, et al. (2016) Energy planning and policy making; The case study of Iran. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plann, Policy 11: 682-689. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2012.741186
![]() |
[4] |
Gabbar HA, Eldessouky A, Runge J (2016) Evaluation of renewable energy deployment scenarios for building energy management. AIMS Energy 4: 742-761. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.5.742
![]() |
[5] |
Saeed T, Tularam GA (2017) Relations between fossil fuel returns and climate change variables using canonical correlation analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plann, Policy 12: 675-684. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2016.1265615
![]() |
[6] |
Kim SB, Cho JH (2014) A study on forecasting green infrastructure construction market. KSCE J Civ Eng 18: 430-443. doi: 10.1007/s12205-014-0189-8
![]() |
[7] |
Hailu AD, Kumsa DK (2021) Ethiopia renewable energy potentials and current state. AIMS Energy 9: 1-14. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021001
![]() |
[8] |
Kahia M, Jebli MB, Belloumi M (2019) Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21: 871-885. doi: 10.1007/s10098-019-01676-2
![]() |
[9] | Alizadeh R, Maknoon R, Majidpour M (2014) Clean Development Mechanism, a bridge to mitigate the Greenhouse Gasses: is it broken in Iran. 13th International Conference on Clean Energy (ICCE): 399-404. |
[10] | Asutosh AT, Woo J, Kouhirostami M, et al. (2020) Renewable energy industry trends and its contributions to the development of energy resilience in an era of accelerating climate change. Int J Energy Power Eng 14: 233-240. |
[11] |
Brockway PE, Owen A, Brand-Correa LI, et al. (2019) Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nat Energy 4: 612-621. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z
![]() |
[12] |
Suárez-Eiroa B, Fernández E, Méndez-Martínez G, et al. (2019) Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J Cleaner Prod 214: 952-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271
![]() |
[13] |
Kirchherr J, Piscicelli L, Bour R, et al. (2018) Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecol Econ 150: 264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
![]() |
[14] |
Okafor C, Madu C, Ajaero C, et al. (2021) Moving beyond fossil fuel in an oil-exporting and emerging economy: Paradigm shift. AIMS Energy 9: 379-413. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021020
![]() |
[15] | International Energy Agency. Data and statistics, 2018. Available from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/. |
[16] |
Falcone PM, Morone P, Sica E (2018) Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition: A discursive approach to assess landscape pressures on the Italian financial system. Technol Forecast Soc Change 127: 23-37. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.020
![]() |
[17] |
Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, et al. (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev 24: 38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
![]() |
[18] |
Fadly D (2019) Low-carbon transition: Private sector investment in renewable energy projects in developing countries. World Dev 122: 552-569. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.015
![]() |
[19] |
Moriarty P, Honnery D (2018) Energy policy and economics under climate change. AIMS Energy 6: 272-290. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.2.272
![]() |
[20] |
Yang X, He L, Xia Y, et al. (2019) Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect. Energy Policy 132: 156-166. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.039
![]() |
[21] |
Ndiritu SW, Engola MK (2020) The effectiveness of feed-in-tariff policy in promoting power generation from renewable energy in Kenya. Renewable Energy 161: 593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.082
![]() |
[22] | Erfani A, Tavakolan M (2020) Risk evaluation model of wind energy investment projects using modified fuzzy group decision-making and monte carlo simulation. Arthaniti: J Econ Theory Pract, 0976747920963222. |
[23] |
Echeverri-Martínez R, Alfonso-Morales W, Caicedo-Bravo EF (2020) A methodological Decision-Making support for the planning, design and operation of smart grid projects. AIMS Energy 8: 627-651. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.4.627
![]() |
[24] |
Lee HC, Chang CT (2018). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 92: 883-896. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007
![]() |
[25] | Monzer N, Fayek AR, Lourenzutti R, et al. (2019) Aggregation-based framework for construction risk assessment with heterogeneous groups of experts. J Constr Eng Manage, 145. |
[26] |
Perez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, et al. (2013) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern: Syst 44: 494-498. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2259155
![]() |
[27] | Zheng Y (2018) Identifying Dominators and Followers in Group Decision Making based on The Personality Traits. IUI Workshops. Available from: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2068/humanize3.pdf. |
[28] |
Morente-Molinera JA, Wu X, Morfeq A, et al. (2020). A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf Fusion 53: 240-250. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.028
![]() |
[29] |
Alizadeh R, Soltanisehat L, Lund PD, et al. (2020). Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method. Energy Policy 137: 111-174. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111174
![]() |
[30] |
Gündoğdu FK, Kahraman C (2020) A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Comput 24: 4607-4621. doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w
![]() |
[31] |
Zarnegar M (2018) Renewable energy utilization in Iran. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Util, Environ Eff 40: 765-771. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2018.1457741
![]() |
[32] |
Thang VV, Ha T (2019) Optimal siting and sizing of renewable sources in distribution system planning based on life cycle cost and considering uncertainties. AIMS Energy 7: 211-226. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.211
![]() |
[33] | Alizadeh R, Beiragh RG, Soltanisehat L, et al. (2020) Performance evaluation of complex electricity generation systems: A dynamic network-based data envelopment analysis approach. Energy Econ, 91. |
[34] | Alizadeh R, Lund PD, Soltanisehat L (2020) Outlook on biofuels in future studies: A systematic literature review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 134. |
[35] |
Alizadeh R, Allen JK, Mistree F (2020) Managing computational complexity using surrogate models: a critical review. Res Eng Des 31: 275-298. doi: 10.1007/s00163-020-00336-7
![]() |
[36] | Bou-Rabee M, Sulaiman SA, Saleh MS, et al. (2017) Using artificial neural networks to estimate solar radiation in Kuwait. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 72: 434-438. |
[37] |
Teimourian A, Bahrami A, Teimourian H, et al. (2020) Assessment of wind energy potential in the southeastern province of Iran. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Util, Environ Eff 42: 329-343. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1587079
![]() |
[38] | Çakmakçı BA, Hüner E (2020) Evaluation of wind energy potential: a case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Util, Environ Eff, 1-19. |
[39] |
Azizkhani M, Vakili A, Noorollahi Y, et al. (2017) Potential survey of photovoltaic power plants using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in Iran. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 75: 1198-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.103
![]() |
[40] |
Díaz-Cuevas P, Domínguez-Bravo J, Prieto-Campos A (2019) Integrating MCDM and GIS for renewable energy spatial models: assessing the individual and combined potential for wind, solar and biomass energy in Southern Spain. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21: 1855-1869. doi: 10.1007/s10098-019-01754-5
![]() |
[41] |
Yun TS, Lee JS, Lee SC, et al. (2011) Geotechnical issues related to renewable energy. KSCE J Civ Eng 15: 635-642. doi: 10.1007/s12205-011-0004-8
![]() |
[42] |
Liu X, Xu Y, Herrera F (2019). Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors. Inf Fusion 52: 245-256. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.03.001
![]() |
[43] |
Heravi G, Fathi M, Faeghi S (2017) Multi-criteria group decision-making method for optimal selection of sustainable industrial building options focused on petrochemical projects. J Cleaner Prod 142: 2999-3013. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.168
![]() |
[44] |
Dranka GG, Cunha J, de Lima JD, et al. (2020) Economic evaluation methodologies for renewable energy projects. AIMS Energy 8: 339-364. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.2.339
![]() |
[45] |
Boran FE, Boran K, Dizdar E (2012) A fuzzy multi criteria decision making to evaluate energy policy based on an information axiom: a case study in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plann, Policy 7: 230-240. doi: 10.1080/15567240902839294
![]() |
[46] |
Celiktas MS, Kocar G (2010) From potential forecast to foresight of Turkey's renewable energy with Delphi approach. Energy 35: 1973-1980. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.012
![]() |
[47] | Kul C, Zhang L, Solangi YA (2020) Assessing the Renewable Energy Investment Risk Factors for Sustainable Development in Turkey. J Cleaner Prod, 124164. |
[48] | Hsu CC, Sandford BA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess, Res, Eval 12: 10. |
[49] |
Kabak M, Dağdeviren M, Burmaoğlu S (2016) A hybrid SWOT-FANP model for energy policy making in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plann, Policy 11: 487-495. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2012.673692
![]() |
[50] |
Aslani A, Naaranoja M, Zakeri B (2012) The prime criteria for private sector participation in renewable energy investment in the Middle East (case study: Iran). Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16: 1977-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.015
![]() |
[51] | Aslani A, Feng B (2014) Investment prioritization in renewable energy resources with consideration to the investment criteria in Iran. Distrib Gener Altern Energy J 29: 7-26. |
[52] | Erfani A, Tavakolan M (2019) Challenges in renewable energy investment projects in Iran: A review of the main Criteria and Risks. 3rd International Conference on Applied Researches in Structural Engineering and Construction Management, 1-10. |
[53] |
Boran FE (2018) A new approach for evaluation of renewable energy resources: A case of Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ, Plann, Policy 13: 196-204. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2017.1423414
![]() |
[54] |
Ozorhon B, Batmaz A, Caglayan S (2018) Generating a framework to facilitate decision making in renewable energy investments. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 95: 217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.035
![]() |
[55] |
Cavallaro F, Ciraolo L (2005) A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island. Energy Policy 33: 235-244. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00228-3
![]() |
[56] |
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, et al. (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 13: 2263-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
![]() |
[57] |
Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy 35: 2517-2527. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
![]() |
[58] |
Şengül Ü, Eren M, Shiraz SE, et al. (2015) Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable Energy 75: 617-625. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045
![]() |
[59] |
Strantzali E, Aravossis K (2016) Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 55: 885-898. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021
![]() |
[60] |
Al Garni H, Kassem A, Awasthi A, et al. (2016) A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 16: 137-150. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.05.006
![]() |
[61] |
Balin A, Baraçli H (2017) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology based upon the interval type-2 fuzzy sets for evaluating renewable energy alternatives in Turkey. Technol Econ Dev Econ 23: 742-763. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1056276
![]() |
[62] |
Çolak M, Kaya İ (2017) Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 80: 840-853. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.194
![]() |
[63] |
Wu Y, Li L, Song Z, et al. (2019) Risk assessment on offshore photovoltaic power generation projects in China based on a fuzzy analysis framework. J Cleaner Prod 215: 46-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.024
![]() |
[64] |
Solangi YA, Tan Q, Mirjat NH, et al. (2019) An integrated Delphi-AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach toward ranking and selection of renewable energy resources in Pakistan. Processes 7: 118. doi: 10.3390/pr7020118
![]() |
[65] | Karakaş E (2019) Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for turkey via modified fuzzy ahp. Available from: http://zbw.eu/econis-archiv/bitstream/11159/3155/1/1667513583.pdf. |
[66] |
Peng HG, Shen KW, He SS, et al. (2019) Investment risk evaluation for new energy resources: An integrated decision support model based on regret theory and ELECTRE III. Energy Convers Manage 183: 332-348. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.015
![]() |
[67] | Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1: 83-98. |
[68] |
Kamaruzzaman SN, Lou ECW, Wong PF, et al. (2018) Developing weighting system for refurbishment building assessment scheme in Malaysia through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Energy Policy 112: 280-290. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.023
![]() |
[69] | Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15: 234-281. |
[70] | Saaty TL (1990) Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting resource allocation. |
[71] |
Katal F, Fazelpour F (2018) Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis of different types of existing power plants in Iran: An optimized energy planning system. Renewable Energy 120: 163-177. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.061
![]() |
[72] |
Erdogan SA, Šaparauskas J, Turskis Z (2019) A multi-criteria decision-making model to choose the best option for sustainable construction management. Sustainability 11: 2239. doi: 10.3390/su11082239
![]() |
[73] | Feili H, Ahmadian P, Rabiei E, et al. (2018) Ranking of suitable renewable energy location using AHP method and scoring systems with sustainable development perspective. 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Engineering Science and Art, 1-8. |
[74] | OPEC, Share of world crude oil reserves (2018) Available from: https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm. |
[75] |
Mollahosseini A, Hosseini SA, Jabbari M, et al. (2017) Renewable energy management and market in Iran: A holistic review on current state and future demands. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 80: 774-788. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.236
![]() |
1. | Pornpimol Muanjai, Sirawee Chaovalit, Nongnuch Luangpon, Wirasinee Srijunto, Pongrung Chancharoen, Juntip Namsawang, Piyapong Prasertsri, Sigitas Kamandulis, Tomas Venckunas, Orachorn Boonla, Effectiveness of Home-Based Stretching and Strengthening Training for Improving Flexibility, Strength, and Physical Function in Older Adults with Leg Tightness and/or Suspected Sarcopenia, 2025, 13, 2075-4663, 65, 10.3390/sports13030065 |
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Age (years) | 72.03 | 7.03 | 72.62 | 7.75 |
Weight (kg) | 70.10 | 13.10 | 76.15 | 11.14 |
Height (m) | 1.54 | 0.04 | 1.66 | 0.06 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.44 | 5.73 | 27.57 | 3.56 |
Note: BMI: body mass index; SD: Standard deviation.
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
AMMI (kg/m2) | 6.53 | 1.15 | 7.76 | 0.84 |
5-chair test (s) | 11.54 | 2.79 | 10.25 | 2.89 |
Gait speed (m/s) | 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.90 | 0.17 |
TUG (s) | 9.14 | 2.14 | 8.50 | 2.04 |
Note: AMMI: Appendicular muscle mass index; TUG: Time up and go test; SD: Standard deviation.
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Age (years) | 72.03 | 7.03 | 72.62 | 7.75 |
Weight (kg) | 70.10 | 13.10 | 76.15 | 11.14 |
Height (m) | 1.54 | 0.04 | 1.66 | 0.06 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.44 | 5.73 | 27.57 | 3.56 |
Project | Women |
Men |
||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
AMMI (kg/m2) | 6.53 | 1.15 | 7.76 | 0.84 |
5-chair test (s) | 11.54 | 2.79 | 10.25 | 2.89 |
Gait speed (m/s) | 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.90 | 0.17 |
TUG (s) | 9.14 | 2.14 | 8.50 | 2.04 |