The Earth We are Creating

Patrick Moriarty; Damon Honnery; Patrick Moriarty; Damon Honnery

doi:10.3934/energy.2014.2.158

AIMS Energy

2014, Volume 2, Issue 2: 158-171. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.158

Previous Article Next Article

Review Special Issues

The Earth We are Creating

Patrick Moriarty ^{1
,
,},
Damon Honnery ²

1.
Department of Design, Monash University-Caulfield Campus, 900 Dandenong Rd, Caulfield East, Victoria 3145, Australia;
2.
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University-Clayton Campus, P.O Box 31, Victoria 3800, Australia

Received: 26 March 2014 Accepted: 22 April 2014 Published: 26 April 2014

Over the past decade, a number of Earth System scientists have advocated that we need a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, to describe the changes to Earth that have occurred since the 1800s. The preceding epoch, the Holocene (the period from the end of Earth's last glaciation about 12 millennia ago), has offered an unusually stable physical environment for human civilisations. In the new Anthropocene epoch, however, we can no longer count on this climate stability which we have long taken for granted. Paradoxically, it is our own actions that are undermining this stability—for the first time in history, human civilisation is now capable of decisively influencing the energy and material flows of our planet. Particularly since the 1950s, under the twin drivers of growth in population and per capita income, we have seen unprecedented growth in oil use and energy use overall, vehicle numbers, air travel and so on. This unprecedented growth has resulted in us heading toward physical thresholds or tipping points in a number of areas, points that once crossed could irreversibly lead to structural change in vital Earth systems such as climate or ecosystems. We may have already passed three limits: climate change; rate of biodiversity loss; and alterations to the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. The solutions usually proposed for our predicament are yet more technical fixes, often relying on greater use of the Earth's ecosystems, biomass for bioenergy being one example of this, and one we explore in this paper. We argue that these are unlikely to work, and will merely replace one set of problems by another. We conclude that an important approach for achieving a more sustainable and equitable world is to reorient our future toward satisfying the basic human needs of all humanity, and at the same time minimising both our use of non-renewable resources and pollution of the Earth's soil, air and water.
- Anthropocene,
- climate change,
- renewable energy,
- biomass,
- bioenergy,
- Representative Concentration Pathways
Citation: Patrick Moriarty, Damon Honnery. The Earth We are Creating[J]. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 158-171. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.158

Related Papers:

Abstract

Over the past decade, a number of Earth System scientists have advocated that we need a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, to describe the changes to Earth that have occurred since the 1800s. The preceding epoch, the Holocene (the period from the end of Earth's last glaciation about 12 millennia ago), has offered an unusually stable physical environment for human civilisations. In the new Anthropocene epoch, however, we can no longer count on this climate stability which we have long taken for granted. Paradoxically, it is our own actions that are undermining this stability—for the first time in history, human civilisation is now capable of decisively influencing the energy and material flows of our planet. Particularly since the 1950s, under the twin drivers of growth in population and per capita income, we have seen unprecedented growth in oil use and energy use overall, vehicle numbers, air travel and so on. This unprecedented growth has resulted in us heading toward physical thresholds or tipping points in a number of areas, points that once crossed could irreversibly lead to structural change in vital Earth systems such as climate or ecosystems. We may have already passed three limits: climate change; rate of biodiversity loss; and alterations to the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. The solutions usually proposed for our predicament are yet more technical fixes, often relying on greater use of the Earth's ecosystems, biomass for bioenergy being one example of this, and one we explore in this paper. We argue that these are unlikely to work, and will merely replace one set of problems by another. We conclude that an important approach for achieving a more sustainable and equitable world is to reorient our future toward satisfying the basic human needs of all humanity, and at the same time minimising both our use of non-renewable resources and pollution of the Earth's soil, air and water.

References

[1]	Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
[2]	Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, et al. (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans Roy Soc A 369: 842-867. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
[3]	BP (2013) BP Statistical Review Of World Energy London: BP.
[4]	United Nations (UN) (2012) World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. Accessed on 20 March 2014 at (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm).
[5]	Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011) International Energy Outlook 2011. US Dept. of Energy. Available at (http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2011).pdf).
[6]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2011) Rise and Fall of the Carbon Civilisation. London: Springer.
[7]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2014) Reconnecting technology with human welfare. Futures 55: 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2013.12.003
[8]	Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
[9]	Maddison A (2010) Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1-2006 AD. Accessed on 22 March 2014 at (http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/).
[10]	Smil V (2002) The Earth’s Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics and Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[11]	Nicol S (2011) Givers of life. New Sci 9 July: 36-39.
[12]	Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya1 S (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471: 51-57. doi: 10.1038/nature09678
[13]	Heinberg R (2007) Peak Everything: Waking up to the Century of Decline in Earth’s Resources. Forest Row, UK: Clairview.
[14]	Campbell CJ (2013) Recognising the second half of the oil age. Environ Innovation Soc Transitions 9: 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.08.004
[15]	Wikipedia (2014) Catastrophism. Accessed on 20 March 2014 at (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophists).
[16]	Gould SJ, Eldridge N (1993) Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366: 223-226. doi: 10.1038/366223a0
[17]	Velders GJM, Fahey DW, Daniel JS et al. (2009) The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106: 10949-10954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902817106
[18]	Laurance W (2008) Tipping the balance. The Ecologist 38(6): 37-41.
[19]	Ditlevsen PD, Johnsen SJ (2010) Tipping points: Early warning and wishful thinking. Geophys Res Lett 37: 19703.
[20]	Tierney K (2008) Hurricane in New Orleans? Who knew? Anticipating Katrina and its devastation. Sociol Inquiry 78(2): 179-183.
[21]	Brulle RJ (2014) Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Clim Change DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
[22]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2010) A human needs approach to reducing atmospheric carbon. Energy Policy 38(2): 695-700.
[23]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2011) Is there an optimum level for renewable energy? Energy Policy 39: 2748-2753. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.044
[24]	Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, et al. (2011) RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 ℃. Clim Change 109: 95-116.
[25]	Dittmar M (2013) The end of cheap uranium. Sci Total Environ 461: 792-798.
[26]	Searle SY, Malins CJ (2014) Will energy crop yields meet expectations? Biomass Bioenergy Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001.
[27]	Keller DP, Feng EY, Oschlies A (2014) Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario. Nature Comm 5: 1-11
[28]	Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Clim Change 109: 5-31. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
[29]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2007) Bioenergy: problems and prospects. Int J Global Energy Issues 27: 231-249. doi: 10.1504/IJGEI.2007.013657
[30]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2009) What energy levels can the Earth sustain? Energy Policy 37: 2469–2474.
[31]	Van Vuuren DP, Sebastiaan D, van Ruijven BJ, et al (2013) The role of negative CO₂ emissions for reaching 2 ℃—insights from integrated assessment modelling. Clim Change 118: 15-27. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0680-5
[32]	Krausmann F, Erb KH, Gringrich S, et al. (2013) Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. PNAS 110: 10324-10329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211349110
[33]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2012) What is the global potential for renewable energy? Renew Sus Energy Rev 16: 244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151
[34]	Moriarty P, Honnery D (2012) Preparing for a low-energy future. Futures 44: 883-892. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.08.002
[35]	Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, et al. (2011) Earth's energy imbalance and implications. Available at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1105/1105.1140.pdf.
[36]	Roe G (2010) Knowability and no ability in climate projections. Available at: http://earthweb.ess.washington.edu/roe/GerardWeb/Publications_files/Roe_Knowability_EPA.pdf.
[37]	Kitzes J, Wackernagel M, Loh J, et al. (2008) Shrink and share: Humanity's present and future Ecological Footprint. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 363: 467-475. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2164

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2014 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)