Research has linked increased fertilizer usage in the past twenty years to large zones of hypoxia and algal blooms in Lake Erie, the northern Gulf of Mexico and other water bodies across the U.S. Given the nature and the scale of these impacts, researchers and policymakers benefit by understanding the drivers behind the increased demand for fertilizer and fertilizer management to help develop strategies to reduce nonpoint source pollution associated with excessive fertilizer applications. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of crop price, specifically for corn, on expected demand for nitrogen fertilizer at the farm level. Using survey data, we examine the impact that an increase in expected corn prices could have on potential demand for nitrogen fertilizer given farm characteristics, farm demographics, and farmer behavior, holding land area and fertilizer price fixed. Results indicate that the marginal probability of a farmer increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates when crop prices increase is positive and statistically significant. In addition, we find that this marginal probability increases at a decreasing rate with moderate increases in corn price (up to around 20%) and then decreases at an increasing rate afterwards, while remaining positive. Thus, farmers are likely to increase nitrogen fertilizer applications to corn with future corn price increases.
Citation: Jason S. Bergtold, Noah J. Miller, Samuel M. Funk. Corn price fluctuations on potential nitrogen application by farmers in the Midwestern U.S.: A survey approach[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 553-566. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022034
Research has linked increased fertilizer usage in the past twenty years to large zones of hypoxia and algal blooms in Lake Erie, the northern Gulf of Mexico and other water bodies across the U.S. Given the nature and the scale of these impacts, researchers and policymakers benefit by understanding the drivers behind the increased demand for fertilizer and fertilizer management to help develop strategies to reduce nonpoint source pollution associated with excessive fertilizer applications. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of crop price, specifically for corn, on expected demand for nitrogen fertilizer at the farm level. Using survey data, we examine the impact that an increase in expected corn prices could have on potential demand for nitrogen fertilizer given farm characteristics, farm demographics, and farmer behavior, holding land area and fertilizer price fixed. Results indicate that the marginal probability of a farmer increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates when crop prices increase is positive and statistically significant. In addition, we find that this marginal probability increases at a decreasing rate with moderate increases in corn price (up to around 20%) and then decreases at an increasing rate afterwards, while remaining positive. Thus, farmers are likely to increase nitrogen fertilizer applications to corn with future corn price increases.
| [1] |
Chavas JP, Chambers RG, Pope RD (2010) Production economics and farm management: A century of contributions. Am J Agric Econ 92: 356-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq004 doi: 10.1093/ajae/aaq004
|
| [2] |
Michalak AM, Anderson EJ, Beletsky D, et al. (2013) Record setting algal bloom in Lake Erire caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: 6448-6452. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216006110 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216006110
|
| [3] |
Ribaduo MO, Heimlich R, Peters M (2005) Nitrogen sources and Gulf hypoxia: Potential environmental credit trading. Ecol Econ 52: 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.021 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.021
|
| [4] |
Secchi S, Gassman PW, Jha M, et al. (2011) Potential water quality changes due to corn expansion in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Ecol Appl 21: 1068-2084. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0619.1 doi: 10.1890/09-0619.1
|
| [5] |
Sohngen B, King KW, Howard G, et al. (2015) Nutrient prices and concentrations in Midwestern agricultural watersheds. Ecol Econ 112: 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.008
|
| [6] |
Denbaly M, Vroomen H (1993) Dynamic fertilizer nutrient demands for corn: A cointegrated and error-correcting system. Am J Agric Econ 75: 203-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242968 doi: 10.2307/1242968
|
| [7] |
Heady EO, Yeh MH (1959) National and regional demand functions for fertilizer. J Farm Econ 42: 332-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/1235160 doi: 10.2307/1235160
|
| [8] | Carman H (1979) The demand for nitrogen, phosphorous and potash fertilizer nutrients in the western United States. West J Agric Econ 4: 23-31. |
| [9] | Williamson JM (2011) The role of information and prices in the nitrogen fertilizer management decision: new evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. J Agric Resour Econ 36: 552-572. |
| [10] |
Gunjal KR, Roberts RR, Heady EO (1980) Fertilizer demand functions for five crops in the United States. South J Agric Econ 12: 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0081305200015703 doi: 10.1017/S0081305200015703
|
| [11] |
Choi JS, Helmberger PG (1993) How sensitive are crop yields to price changes and farm programs? J Agric Appl Econ 25: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800018794 doi: 10.1017/S1074070800018794
|
| [12] |
Stuart D, Schewe RL, McDermott M (2014) Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as climate change mitigation strategy: understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US. Land Use Policy 36: 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011
|
| [13] |
Bergtold JS, Ramsey S, Maddy L, et al. (2019) A review of economic considerations for cover crops as a conservation practice. Renewable Agric Food Systems 34: 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000278 doi: 10.1017/S1742170517000278
|
| [14] | Phaneuf DJ, von Haefen RH, Mansfield C, et al. (2013) Measuring nutrient reduction benefits for policy analysis using linked non-market valuation and environmental assessment models. Final report on stated survey preferences. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/final-report-stated-preferences-surveys.pdf. |
| [15] |
Veettil PC, Speelman S, Frija A, et al. (2011) Price sensitivity of farmer preferences for irrigation-water pricing method: Evidence form a choice model analysis in Krishna River Basin, India. J Water Resour Plann Manage 137: 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000103 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000103
|
| [16] |
Hendricks NP, Smith A, Sumner DA. (2014) Crop supply dynamics and the illusion of partial adjustment. Am J Agric Econ 96: 1469-1491. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau024 doi: 10.1093/ajae/aau024
|
| [17] | United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS) (2017) Census of Agriculture. 2017 Census volume 1, chapter 2: State level data. Available from: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/. |
| [18] | Breen JP, Clancy D, Donnellan T, et al. (2012) Estimating the elasticity of demand and the production response for nitrogen fertiliser on Irish Farms. Contributed Paper presented at the 86th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Warwick, United Kingdom. Available from: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/134965/. |
| [19] |
Sheriff G (2005) Efficient waste? Why farmers over-apply nutrients and the implications for policy design. Rev Agric Econ 27: 542-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2005.00263.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2005.00263.x
|
| [20] | Arnade CA, Cooper J (2013) Price expectations and supply response. Selected Paper presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Washington, D.C. Available from: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/150490/. |
| [21] | Chavas JP (1999) On the economic rationality of market participants: the case of expectations in the U.S. pork market. J Agric Resour Econ 24: 19-37. |
| [22] |
Reimer AP, Houser MK, Marquart-Pyatt ST (2020) Farming decisions in a complex and uncertain world: nitrogen management in Midwestern corn agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv 75: 617-628. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.00070 doi: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00070
|
| [23] | Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. |
| [24] | Greene WH (2012) NLOGIT Version 4 Reference Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc. |
| [25] | Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
| [26] |
Hendricks NP, Sinnathamby S, Douglas-Mankin K, et al. (2014) The environmental effects of crop price increases: nitrogen losses in the U.S. Corn Belt. J Environ Econ Manage 3: 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.002
|
| [27] |
Dhakal C, Lange K, Parajulee MN, et al. (2019) Dynamic optimization of nitrogen in Plateau Cotton Yield Functions with Nitrogen Carryover Considerations. J Agric Appl Econ 51: 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2019.6 doi: 10.1017/aae.2019.6
|
| [28] |
Su DH, Moss CB (2018) Examining crop price effects on production decision and resource allocation: An ex-ante approach. Appl Econ 50: 2909-2919. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1412077 doi: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1412077
|
| [29] | Henderson B, Lankoski J (2021) Assessing the environmental impacts of agricultural policies. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 43: 1487-1502. For more questions regarding reference style, please refer to the Citing Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13081 |
Figures(1) / Tables(2)
Jason S. Bergtold, Noah J. Miller, Samuel M. Funk. Corn price fluctuations on potential nitrogen application by farmers in the Midwestern U.S.: A survey approach[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 553-566. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022034
DownLoad: