Food safety is vital for public health, influencing a country's economic development and international reputation. In recent years, Taiwan has encountered several food quality problems, with consequent public questioning and mistrust of food safety. If consumers are unaware of the quality of a product, their perception and demands can be influenced by the credibility of the food safety certification labels. This study uses the contingent valuation method (CVM) to analyze the factors influencing consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for food safety certification labels of packaged rice. Questionnaires are randomly adopted and assigned to 434 participants. The results indicate that product factors should be presented clearly on their packaging and advertisements. Consumers focus on certification labels for food safety perception. Gender, education level, place of purchase, certification cognition, and health cognition are all found to affect willingness to pay. These significant results indicate that women were more willing to pay than men; people were willing to pay a higher amount for purchases of packaged rice at supermarkets or hypermarkets; health cognition was estimated to be negative and significant, showing that health cognition negatively affected WTP, perhaps because participants did not sufficiently trust the foundation's assurance that the rice was safe. In the valuation of WTP for food safety certification, each person was willing to pay on average NT31.07 annually to reduce the risk of food safety problems.
Citation: Chung-Te Ting, Yu-Sheng Huang, Cheng-Te Lin, Yun Hsieh. Measuring consumer' willingness to pay for food safety certification labels of packaged rice[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 1000-1010. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021060
Food safety is vital for public health, influencing a country's economic development and international reputation. In recent years, Taiwan has encountered several food quality problems, with consequent public questioning and mistrust of food safety. If consumers are unaware of the quality of a product, their perception and demands can be influenced by the credibility of the food safety certification labels. This study uses the contingent valuation method (CVM) to analyze the factors influencing consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for food safety certification labels of packaged rice. Questionnaires are randomly adopted and assigned to 434 participants. The results indicate that product factors should be presented clearly on their packaging and advertisements. Consumers focus on certification labels for food safety perception. Gender, education level, place of purchase, certification cognition, and health cognition are all found to affect willingness to pay. These significant results indicate that women were more willing to pay than men; people were willing to pay a higher amount for purchases of packaged rice at supermarkets or hypermarkets; health cognition was estimated to be negative and significant, showing that health cognition negatively affected WTP, perhaps because participants did not sufficiently trust the foundation's assurance that the rice was safe. In the valuation of WTP for food safety certification, each person was willing to pay on average NT31.07 annually to reduce the risk of food safety problems.
| [1] |
Luning PA, Kirezieve K, Hagelaar G, et al. (2013) Performance assessment of food safety management systems in animal-based food companies in view of their context characteristics: A European study. Food Control 33: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.008
|
| [2] |
Escanciano C, Santos-Vijande ML (2014) Reasons and constraints to implementing an ISO 22000 food safety management system: Evidence from Spain. Food Control 40: 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.032
|
| [3] |
Papadopoulos N, Helop L (2002) Country equity and country branding: Problem and prospects. J Brand Manage 9: 294-314. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540079
|
| [4] |
Wertheim-Heck SC, Spaargaren G, Vellema S (2014) Food safety in everyday life: Shopping for vegetables in a rural city in Vietnam. J Rural Stud 35: 37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.002
|
| [5] |
Akkerman R, Farahani P, Grunow M (2010) Quality, safety and sustainability in food distribution: a review of quantitative operations management approaches and challenges. OR Spectrum 32: 863-904. doi: 10.1007/s00291-010-0223-2
|
| [6] |
Jin HJ, Han DH (2014) Interaction between message framing and consumers' prior subjective knowledge food safety issues. Food Policy 44: 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.007
|
| [7] |
Crespi JM, Marette S (2001) How should food safety certification be financed? American J Agric Econ 83: 852-861. doi: 10.1111/0002-9092.00214
|
| [8] |
Wongprawmas R, Canavari M (2017) Consumers' willingness-to-pay for food safety labels in an emerging market: The case of fresh produce in Thailand. Food Policy 69: 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.004
|
| [9] | Altmann M (1997) Agro-food marketing. Wallingford, Oxford: CAB International. |
| [10] |
Pancer E, McShane L, Noseworthy TJ (2017) Isolated environmental cues and product efficacy penalties: The color green and eco-labels. J Bus Ethics 143: 159-177. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2764-4
|
| [11] |
Brach S, Walsh G, Shaw D (2018) Sustainable consumption and third-party certification labels: Consumers' perceptions and reactions. Eur Manage J 36: 254-265. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.005
|
| [12] |
Erdem T, Swait J (1998) Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J Consum Psychol 7: 131-157. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02
|
| [13] |
Smith DC, Park CW (1992) The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. J Mark Res 29: 296-313. doi: 10.1177/002224379202900302
|
| [14] |
Bernues A, Olaizola A, Corcoran K (2003) Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci 60: 1095-1106. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00327-3
|
| [15] | Drichoutis A, Lazaridis P, Nayga RMJ (2006) Consumers' use of nutritional labels: A review of research studies and issues. Acad Mark Sci Rev 10. |
| [16] |
Aprile MC, Caputo V, Nayga Jr RM (2012) Consumers' valuation of food quality labels: The case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels. Int J Consum Stud 36: 158-165. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01092.x
|
| [17] |
Wang J, Ge J, Ma Y (2018) Urban Chinese Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Sustainability. 10: 603. doi: 10.3390/su10030603
|
| [18] |
Liu Q, Yan Z, Zhou J (2017) Consumer choices and motives for eco-labeled products in China: An empirical analysis based on the choice experiment. Sustainability 9: 331. doi: 10.3390/su9030331
|
| [19] | Venkatachalam L (2003) The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assess Rev 24: 89-124. |
| [20] | Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2008) Willingness-to-pay of public transport users for improvement in service quality. Eur Transp Traspori Europei 38: 107-118. |
| [21] |
Hanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 73: 1255-1263. doi: 10.2307/1242453
|
| [22] |
Alberini A (1995) Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: Bivariate and interval-data models. J Environ Econ Manag 29: 169-180. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1039
|
| [23] |
Hossain KZ, Xue J, Rabbany MG (2021). Consumers' willingness to pay for GLOBALG. AP certified chicken: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey in Bangladesh. Food Control 130: 108397. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108397
|
| [24] |
Ragasa, C, Andam, KS, Asante SB, Amewu, S (2020). Can local products compete against imports in West Africa? Supply-and demand-side perspectives on chicken, rice, and tilapia in Ghana. Global Food Secur 26: 100448. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100448
|
Chung-Te Ting, Yu-Sheng Huang, Cheng-Te Lin, Yun Hsieh. Measuring consumer' willingness to pay for food safety certification labels of packaged rice[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 1000-1010. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021060
DownLoad: