One of Russia's strategic objectives is to identify and create conditions to ensure accelerated development of promising centers of economic growth in the country's regions. In practice, most of these centers are cities of different levels of hierarchy, which create or have the potential to create urban agglomerations on their basis. At the same time, at present, most attention is paid to the study of the largest and large urban agglomerations not only in domestic, but also in the world science; while the real prerequisites and processes of second-tier agglomerations development are studied rather poorly. In this regard, the purpose of this paper was to analyze and identify the specifics of agglomeration processes in several Russian second-tier agglomerations. To achieve this purpose, we used a wide range of both general scientific (analysis, synthesis, structural-functional, etc.) and applied economic and mathematical methods (index method, correlation analysis, calculation of the Theil index). The main conclusions of the research was that the key trend of these agglomerations' development was the increasing concentration of an already high share of regional production, investment, and population against the background of growing intra-regional heterogeneity. At the same time, agglomeration processes themselves spread only to the territory closest to the core, which is manifested in the convergence of growth rates of these territories in terms of key socio-economic indicators. All this proves the underdevelopment of the satellite zone of second-tier agglomerations and the hypertrophied development of the core: weak interconnectedness of their reproductive processes, which may be a threat to the development of such agglomerations as integrated socio-economic systems and growth centers of regional and macro-regional significance in the future. The authors showed that a number of northern/arctic agglomerations (Surgut, Arkhangelsk) have a significant development potential due to not only the formed economic base of their satellite zone, but also socio-economic connectivity along the line "core-satellite zone". The scientific novelty of the presented research lies in the development of approaches, substantiation of methodological tools for assessing agglomeration processes, and identification of the specifics of these processes in Russian second-tier agglomerations on the basis of its testing.
Citation: Nikolai Voroshilov, Sergei Kozhevnikov. Assessing agglomeration processes in Russian second-tier urban agglomerations[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(2): 148-171. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024007
One of Russia's strategic objectives is to identify and create conditions to ensure accelerated development of promising centers of economic growth in the country's regions. In practice, most of these centers are cities of different levels of hierarchy, which create or have the potential to create urban agglomerations on their basis. At the same time, at present, most attention is paid to the study of the largest and large urban agglomerations not only in domestic, but also in the world science; while the real prerequisites and processes of second-tier agglomerations development are studied rather poorly. In this regard, the purpose of this paper was to analyze and identify the specifics of agglomeration processes in several Russian second-tier agglomerations. To achieve this purpose, we used a wide range of both general scientific (analysis, synthesis, structural-functional, etc.) and applied economic and mathematical methods (index method, correlation analysis, calculation of the Theil index). The main conclusions of the research was that the key trend of these agglomerations' development was the increasing concentration of an already high share of regional production, investment, and population against the background of growing intra-regional heterogeneity. At the same time, agglomeration processes themselves spread only to the territory closest to the core, which is manifested in the convergence of growth rates of these territories in terms of key socio-economic indicators. All this proves the underdevelopment of the satellite zone of second-tier agglomerations and the hypertrophied development of the core: weak interconnectedness of their reproductive processes, which may be a threat to the development of such agglomerations as integrated socio-economic systems and growth centers of regional and macro-regional significance in the future. The authors showed that a number of northern/arctic agglomerations (Surgut, Arkhangelsk) have a significant development potential due to not only the formed economic base of their satellite zone, but also socio-economic connectivity along the line "core-satellite zone". The scientific novelty of the presented research lies in the development of approaches, substantiation of methodological tools for assessing agglomeration processes, and identification of the specifics of these processes in Russian second-tier agglomerations on the basis of its testing.
[1] | Dmitriev ME, Chistyakov PA, Romashina AA (2018) The role of spatial policy in acceleration of economic growth. Social Sciences and Modernity 5: 31–47. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904990001496-7 doi: 10.31857/S086904990001496-7 |
[2] | Institute of Urban Economics Foundation (2020) Economy of Russian cities and urban agglomerations issue 5: Russia's largest urban agglomerations in the global economy. Available from: https://urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/vypusk_5_rossiiskie_aglomeracii_v_globalnoi_ekonomike.pdf?ysclid = lmyp9veqol204615622. |
[3] | Ezzahid E, Ferrahi B, El Hamdani E (2022) Determinants of urban concentration in African countries. Natl Account Rev 4: 191–203. https://doi.org/10.3934/NAR.2022011 doi: 10.3934/NAR.2022011 |
[4] | Fang C, Yu D (2017) Urban agglomeration: An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon. Landsc Urban Plan 162: 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014 |
[5] | Fang C, Yu D (2020) Сhina's Urban Agglomerations. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1551-4 |
[6] | Grinchel' BM, Antonova AA (2012) Measuring the dynamics of agglomerative processes in the regional economy. Econ Soc Chang: Facts, Trends, Forecast 5: 79–90. |
[7] | Grover A, Lall S, Timmis J (2023) Agglomeration economies in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 101: 103901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103901 doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103901 |
[8] | Kozlova OA, Makarova MN (2014) Methodological tools for assessing the impact of spatial localization on migration processes in the region. Available from: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id = 14513. |
[9] | Kutsenko ES (2012) Path Dependence in Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity: Bad News for Empiric Research of Agglomeration Effects. J New Econ Assoc 2: 10–26. |
[10] | Lappo GM (2012) Cities of Russia. A geographer's view. Мoscow: Novyi khronograf. |
[11] | Lola AM (2013) Urban and agglomeration management in Russia: state and what to do. |
[12] | Melnikov RM (2006) Problems of theory and practice of state regulation of regional economic development: a monograph. Moscow: RAGS. |
[13] | Melnikova LV (2017) City size, efficiency and economic growth. Russ Soc Sci Rev 61: 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2020.1828719 doi: 10.1080/10611428.2020.1828719 |
[14] | Mirgorodskaya EO (2017) Assessment of the territorial and economic connection of cities in the agglomeration (the case of Big Rostov). Bulletin of Volgograd State University 19: 6–21. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.4.1 doi: 10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.4.1 |
[15] | Mishchenko VV, Mishchenko IV (2015) Urban agglomeration: the formation and prospects of development (on the example of the Barnaul agglomeration). Problem analysis and state-management design 8: 68–79. |
[16] | Pivovarov YL (1999) Fundamentals of geo-urbanistics: urbanization and urban systems: textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Vlados. |
[17] | Polyan PM (2014) Territorial structures – urbanization – settlement: theoretical approaches and methods of study. Forewords by G.M. Lappo and A.I. Treivisha. Moscow: Novyi khronograf. |
[18] | Prakash M, Teksoz K, Espey J, et al. (2017) Achieving A Sustainable Urban America. The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25012.09601 |
[19] | Puzanov A, Popov R (2017) Approaches to assessing the development of urban agglomerations. Moscow. Available from: http://www.urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/iue_press.pdf. |
[20] | Rastvortseva SN (2013) Management of the development of economic activity concentration processes in the region: approaches of new economic geography: monograph. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. |
[21] | Rigatti D (2009) Measuring Conurbation, In: Koch, D., Marcus, L., Steen, J., Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Available from: http://www.sss7.org/Proceedings/05%20Spatial%20Morphology%20and%20Urban%20Growth/093_Rigatti.pdf. |
[22] | Sarymova AA, Guseva MS (2022) Assessment of the impact of agglomeration processes on the socio-economic development of municipalities in the region. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics 5: 28–38. https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2022-5-211-28-38 doi: 10.46554/1993-0453-2022-5-211-28-38 |
[23] | Strange WC (2009) Viewpoint: Agglomeration research in the age of disaggregation. Can J Econ 42: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01497.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01497.x |
[24] | Trotskovsky AY (2013) Sustainable development of rural territories of Altai Krai: socio-economic and spatial aspects: collective monograph. |
[25] | Tripathi S (2018) Determinants of employment situation in large agglomerations in India: A cross-sectional study. Regional Science Inquiry 10: 61–75. |
[26] | Uchida H, Nelson A (2010) Agglomeration index: Towards a new measure of urban concentration. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7d55fc41-a76d-5e71-9e69-7a589ced29ff/content. |
[27] | Volchkova IV (2016) Development of agglomeration processes in the aspect of socio-economic space connectivity (the case of Tomsk agglomeration): a monograph. Tomsk: Tomsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. |
[28] | Volchkova IV, Danilova MN, Podoprigora YV, et al. (2014) Assessment of the intensity of socio-economic interactions on the territory of agglomeration in the aspect of socio-economic space connectivity. Management Issues 4: 182–195. |
[29] | Volchkova IV, Minaev NV (2014) Theory and practice of agglomeration development management: a monograph. |
[30] | Voroshilov NV (2019) Approaches to assessing the development of agglomerations in Russia. Problems of Territory's Development 4: 40–54. https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.2 doi: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.2 |
[31] | Wang L, Zhang F, Zang Y, et al. (2022) Understanding the Regional Integration Process from the Perspective of Agglomeration and Urban Networks: Case Study in Central China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 12834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912834 doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912834 |