Women in the sustainability new ventures in the digital era: Out from the shadow of the small country male-dominated startup ecosystem

Tõnis Mets; Piia Vettik-Leemet; Tõnis Mets; Piia Vettik-Leemet

doi:10.3934/GF.2024015

Green Finance

2024, Volume 6, Issue 3: 383-406. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024015

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Women in the sustainability new ventures in the digital era: Out from the shadow of the small country male-dominated startup ecosystem

Tõnis Mets ^,,
Piia Vettik-Leemet

School of Economics and Business Administrations, University of Tartu, Narva Rd 18, 51009 Tartu, Estonia

Received: 26 April 2024 Revised: 29 June 2024 Accepted: 12 July 2024 Published: 16 July 2024
JEL Codes: M13, O16, O31, O44, O52

Environmental sustainability has become one of the key issues for the future development of the European Union (EU). Estonia's startup entrepreneurship contributes prominently to innovative ideas in energy technology and information and communication technology (ICT) applications, essential for sustainability. Research and education are prerequisites for innovation in both fields. The gap in educational levels between Estonian women and men, favoring women, is among the largest in the EU. However, the proportion of women in entrepreneurship is significantly lower, even though the share of women in ICT personnel is among the highest in Europe. This study sought to determine women's contribution to sustainability (technology) startups in the context of these contrasting gaps. The article's dataset was based on sources such as the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Ministry of Education and Science, Business Register, and Startup Ecosystem. It qualitatively analyzed the sustainability orientation of ventures and the gender structure of founders across nearly 1300 startups and clarified the share of selected startups' fundraising within the entire ecosystem. Through a simple regression analysis, we uncovered some short-term trends. Our findings indicate that 92% of the accumulated €4.46 billion in startup funding is foreign capital, and 171 sustainability startups account for nearly 63% of the ecosystem's total fundraising. Among the founders of top-invested startups, only 6% are women, whereas women constitute 23% of the founders of sustainability startups. Despite this, sustainability startups with female participation have secured only 2.2% of the total investments in the sustainability group, highlighting a drastic gender disproportion. However, the fundraising trend for women's sustainability startups founded in the last five years is more positive, reaching 24% of this group's investments. Although their overall share remains significantly lower compared with the entire startup ecosystem, this emerging trend is a promising sign of the breakthrough for female entrepreneurs in a traditionally male-dominated sector. The article's conclusion summarizes the study's results and suggests future gender-based research and development opportunities.
- sustainable entrepreneurship,
- green funding,
- female entrepreneurship,
- startup ecosystem,
- female founders,
- STEM career,
- gender gap,
- Estonia
Citation: Tõnis Mets, Piia Vettik-Leemet. Women in the sustainability new ventures in the digital era: Out from the shadow of the small country male-dominated startup ecosystem[J]. Green Finance, 2024, 6(3): 383-406. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024015

Related Papers:

Abstract

Environmental sustainability has become one of the key issues for the future development of the European Union (EU). Estonia's startup entrepreneurship contributes prominently to innovative ideas in energy technology and information and communication technology (ICT) applications, essential for sustainability. Research and education are prerequisites for innovation in both fields. The gap in educational levels between Estonian women and men, favoring women, is among the largest in the EU. However, the proportion of women in entrepreneurship is significantly lower, even though the share of women in ICT personnel is among the highest in Europe. This study sought to determine women's contribution to sustainability (technology) startups in the context of these contrasting gaps. The article's dataset was based on sources such as the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Ministry of Education and Science, Business Register, and Startup Ecosystem. It qualitatively analyzed the sustainability orientation of ventures and the gender structure of founders across nearly 1300 startups and clarified the share of selected startups' fundraising within the entire ecosystem. Through a simple regression analysis, we uncovered some short-term trends. Our findings indicate that 92% of the accumulated €4.46 billion in startup funding is foreign capital, and 171 sustainability startups account for nearly 63% of the ecosystem's total fundraising. Among the founders of top-invested startups, only 6% are women, whereas women constitute 23% of the founders of sustainability startups. Despite this, sustainability startups with female participation have secured only 2.2% of the total investments in the sustainability group, highlighting a drastic gender disproportion. However, the fundraising trend for women's sustainability startups founded in the last five years is more positive, reaching 24% of this group's investments. Although their overall share remains significantly lower compared with the entire startup ecosystem, this emerging trend is a promising sign of the breakthrough for female entrepreneurs in a traditionally male-dominated sector. The article's conclusion summarizes the study's results and suggests future gender-based research and development opportunities.

References

[1]	Acs ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2015) National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. In: Ács ZJ, Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives Ed., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 523–541. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718053.00040
[2]	Avnimelech G, Rechter E (2023) How and why accelerators enhance female entrepreneurship. Res Policy 52: 104669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104669 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104669
[3]	Baltà-Salvador R, Peña M, Renta-Davids AI, et al. (2024) The intersection of sex and field: an examination of career choice factors and dropout intentions in STEM and non-STEM degrees. Eur J Engin Educ, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2319044 doi: 10.1080/03043797.2024.2319044
[4]	Belz FM, Binder JK (2017) Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Bus Strateg Environ 26: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887 doi: 10.1002/bse.1887
[5]	Berger ES, Kuckertz A (2016) Female entrepreneurship in startup ecosystems worldwide. J Bus Res 69: 5163–5168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.098 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.098
[6]	Bhatnagar M, Taneja S, Özen E (2022) A wave of green startups in India—The study of green finance as a support system for sustainable entrepreneurship. Green Finan 4: 253–273. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2022012 doi: 10.3934/GF.2022012
[7]	Braches B, Elliott C (2017) Articulating the entrepreneurship career: A study of German women entrepreneurs. Int Small Bus J 35: 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616651921 doi: 10.1177/0266242616651921
[8]	Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future—Call for action. Environ Conserv 14: 291–294. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44518052.pdf.
[9]	Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.) Sustainability. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sustainability#.
[10]	Chaturvedi S (2015) So What Exactly is 'Deep Technology'? Available from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/so-what-exactly-deep-technology-swati-chaturvedi/.
[11]	Cusumano MA (2013) Evaluating a startup venture. Comm ACM 56: 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505337 doi: 10.1145/2505337
[12]	Davidsson P (2016) Researching entrepreneurship, New York: Springer. https://10.1007/978-3-319-26692-3
[13]	Davis DM (2024) Funding for female founders remained consistent in 2023. Available from: https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/10/funding-for-female-founders-remained-consistent-in-2023.
[14]	De la Tour A, Portincaso M, Goeldel N, et al. (2021) Deep Tech: The great wave of innovation, Paris: Boston Consulting Group & Hello Tomorrow SES. Available from: https://hello-tomorrow.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BCG_Hello_Tomorrow_Great-Wave.pdf.
[15]	Dumas M (2014) The Rise of the Estonian Startupsphere. IT Prof 16: 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2014.62 doi: 10.1109/MITP.2014.62
[16]	EC (2021) Women in Digital Scoreboard 2021. Country profiles, Brussels: European Commission. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/women-digital-scoreboard-2021.
[17]	EC (2019) Women in digital, Brussels: European Commission. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/women-digital.
[18]	Ers H, Pikma P, Palm R, et al. (2024) Teaching electrochemistry and student participation in the development of sustainable electricity generation/storage devices at the Institute of Chemistry of the University of Tartu. J Solid State Electrochemistry 28: 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05667-8 doi: 10.1007/s10008-023-05667-8
[19]	Escárzaga AL (2024) TOP 100: Europe's most influential women in the startup and venture capital space. Available from: https://www.eu-startups.com/2024/03/top-100-europes-most-influential-women-in-the-startup-and-venture-capital-space-3/. (accessed on March 8, 2024)
[20]	Estonian Qualifications Authority (2023) OSKA general forecast 2022–2031(in Estonian). Available from: https://uuringud.oska.kutsekoda.ee/uuringud/oska-uldprognoos.
[21]	Ewens M, Townsend RR (2020) Are early stage investors biased against women? J Fin Econ 135: 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.002
[22]	GEM (2024) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Available from: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report.
[23]	Gill J, Sharp R, Mills J, Franzway S (2008) I still wanna be an engineer! Women, education and the engineering profession. Europ J Eng Edu 33: 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802253459 doi: 10.1080/03043790802253459
[24]	Gorbacheva E, Beekhuyzen J, vom Brocke J, et al. (2019) Directions for research on gender imbalance in the IT profession. Europ J Inform Sys 28: 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1495893 doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1495893
[25]	Goswami K, Mitchell JR, Bhagavatula S (2018) Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strat Entrep J 12: 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1281 doi: 10.1002/sej.1281
[26]	Guerrero M, Espinoza-Benavides J (2021) Do emerging ecosystems and individual capitals matter in entrepreneurial re-entry' quality and speed? Int Entrep Manag J 17: 1131–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00733-3 doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00733-3
[27]	Gupta N, Etzkowitz H (2021) Women founders in a high-tech incubator: negotiating entrepreneurial identity in the Indian socio-cultural context. Int J Gender Entrep 13: 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-11-2020-0181 doi: 10.1108/IJGE-11-2020-0181
[28]	Gupta VK, Turban DB (2012) Evaluation of new business ideas: do gender stereotypes play a role? J Managerial Issues XXIV: 140–156. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43488130.
[29]	GSM (2022) German Startup Monitor 2022. PwC & Startup-Verband. Available from: https://startupverband.de/fileadmin/startupverband/mediaarchiv/research/dsm/dsm_2022_English_Summary.pdf.
[30]	Hakala H, O'Shea G, Farny S, et al. (2020) Re‐storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts: The model‐narrative review method. Int J Manag Rev 22: 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212 doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12212
[31]	Hirschfeld A, Gilde J, Walk V (2022) Female Founders Monitor 2022. Berlin: Bundesverband Deutsche Startups. Available from: https://startupverband.de/fileadmin/startupverband/mediaarchiv/research/ffm/Female_Founders_Monitor_2022_English.pdf.
[32]	Jonsson L (2024) Is the position of power more relevant than gender for commercialization of research? - An explorative longitudinal study over 21 years. J Knowledge Econ, (submitted).
[33]	Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, et al. (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad Manage J 61: 586–614. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1215 doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.1215
[34]	Kutsenko E, Tyurchev K, Ostashchenko T (2022) Relocation as a driver of innovative activity: a global study of unicorn founders' migration. Foresight STI Govern 16: 6–23. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.6.23 doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.6.23
[35]	Lahikainen K, Kolhinen J, Ruskovaara E, et al. (2019) Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Ind High Educ 33: 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218815806 doi: 10.1177/0950422218815806
[36]	Malecki EJ (2018) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass 12: e12359. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359 doi: 10.1111/gec3.12359
[37]	Marquardt L, Harima A (2024) Digital boundary spanning in the evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. J Bus Res 182: 114762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114762 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114762
[38]	Mets T (2018) Entrepreneurial developments toward a knowledge-based economy in Estonia: The case of Fits Me–venture-capital-backed startup going global. In: Mets T, Sauka A, Purg D, Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe Eds., New York: Routledge, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315392387-6
[39]	Mets T (2017) Is ICT the solution of the problem for Estonia? In: Kaur H, Lechman E, Marszk A, Catalyzing Development through ICT Adoption: The Developing World Experience Eds., Cham: Springer, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56523-1_15
[40]	Mets T (2016) Is Estonia becoming a better home for 'born globals'? In: Smallbone D, Virtanen M, Sauka A, Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional development Eds., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365553.00012
[41]	Mets T (2012) Creative business model innovation for globalizing SMEs. In: Burger-Helmchen T, Entrepreneurship–creativity and innovative business models, Ed., Rijeka: InTech, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.5772/37915
[42]	Mets T, Kelli A (2015) Rural development in the digital era: A case of a born-global SME in Estonia. In: Kotey B, Mazzarol T, Clark D, McKeown T, Battisti M, SMEs in the Digital Economy: Surviving the digital revolution, Eds., Prahran VIC: Tilde University Press, 50–63.
[43]	Morawczyński R (2020) Venture capitalists' investment criteria in Poland: Entrepreneurial opportunities, entrepreneurs, and founding teams. Admin Sci 10: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040077 doi: 10.3390/admsci10040077
[44]	Olek K (2023) Startups and Lean Startup approach in building innovative companies creating unique market values–theoretical considerations. Proc Comp Sci 225: 3745–3753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.370 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.370
[45]	Orser B, Coleman S, Yanhong L (2020) Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds. Small Bus Econ 55: 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1 doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1
[46]	Petrović J, Radukić S (2018) The distinctiveness of female entrepreneurship in post-transition countries: The case of Central Europe and the Baltic states, In: Ateljević J, Budak J, Entrepreneurship in Post-Communist Countries: New Drivers Towards a Market Economy Eds., Cham: Springer, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75907-4_7
[47]	Picken JC (2017) From startup to scalable enterprise: Laying the foundation. Bus Horizons 60: 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.002
[48]	Prohorovs A (2020) Unicorn exits as a trigger for the development of small countries' startup ecosystems. Forbes (Latvian edition) 16: 14–19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726135 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3726135
[49]	Rugina S (2019) Female entrepreneurship in the Baltics: formal and informal context. Int J Gender Entrep 11: 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-05-2018-0055 doi: 10.1108/IJGE-05-2018-0055
[50]	Saluveer S-K, Truu M (2020) Startup Estonia White Paper 2021–2027. Tallinn: Startup Estonia. Available from: https://media.voog.com/0000/0037/5345/files/Startup%20Estonia%20White%20Paper%202021-2027.pdf.
[51]	Schmidt C, Off R, Reuther K, et al. (2023) Think BIQ: Gender Differences, Entrepreneurship Support and the Quality of Business Idea Description, In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC58018.2023.10332352
[52]	Snellman K, Solal I (2023) Does Investor Gender Matter for the Success of Female Entrepreneurs? Gender Homophily and the Stigma of Incompetence in Entrepreneurial Finance. Org Sci 34: 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1594 doi: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1594
[53]	Stam E, Van de Ven A (2021) Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Bus Econ 56: 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6 doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
[54]	Startup Estonia (2024) Startups. Available from: https://ecosystem.startupestonia.ee/custom/startups/f/all_slug_locations/anyof_estonia/data_type/anyof_Verified.
[55]	Startup Genom (2023) The Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2023. Available from: https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2023.
[56]	Statista (2023) Investment volume in startups in Germany from 2015 to 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1332120/start-up-investment-volume-germany/.
[57]	Stefanuk A (2020) How Estonia became a tech startup nation. Available from: https://nordicstartupnews.com/how-estonia-became-a-tech-startup-nation/.
[58]	Szelényi K, Denson N, Inkelas KK (2013) Women in STEM majors and professional outcome expectations: The role of living-learning programs and other college environments. Res High Educ 54: 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9299-2 doi: 10.1007/s11162-013-9299-2
[59]	Tiba S, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP (2021) Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences. J Clean Product 306: 127054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054
[60]	Trabskaja J, Mets T (2019) Ecosystem as the source of entrepreneurial opportunities. Foresight STI Govern 13: 10–22. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22 doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22
[61]	UN (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
[62]	Valk A (2015) Soolised lõhed hariduses (Gender gaps in education, in Estonian) Tartu: Ministry of Education and Research.
[63]	Welsh DH, Kaciak E, Fadairo M, et al. (2023) How to erase gender differences in entrepreneurial success? Look at the ecosystem. J Bus Res 154: 113320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113320 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113320
[64]	Zhao Y, Xie X, Yang L (2021) Female entrepreneurs and equity crowdfunding: the consequential roles of lead investors and venture stages. Int Entrep Manage J 17: 1183–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00659-w doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00659-w

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)