Spreading entrepreneurial news—investigating media influence on social entrepreneurial antecedents

Philipp Kruse; Philipp Kruse

doi:10.3934/GF.2020016

Green Finance

2020, Volume 2, Issue 3: 284-301. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020016

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Spreading entrepreneurial news—investigating media influence on social entrepreneurial antecedents

Philipp Kruse ^,

School of Science, Technical University Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Received: 01 July 2020 Accepted: 13 August 2020 Published: 24 August 2020
JEL Codes: L31

Attitude towards social entrepreneurship (SE),i.e. the positive or negative evaluation of this career and perceived behavioral control (PBC),i.e. the conviction that one is able to succeed as a social entrepreneur have been identified as suitable individual predictors for SE-intention,i.e. the intention to found an enterprise with the aspiration to generate revenue and address social problems. Recent research found evidence for external influences on attitudes,PBC,and SE-intention like culture or economic and political circumstances,however,to date no study has been conducted on the extent to which attitudes and PBC can be altered by external media-related influences. Investigating two students' samples (N_total = 345),a randomized 2 × 2 experimental design was used to examine the influence of newspaper articles on SE-related attitudes and PBC. The experiment featured four different conditions,namely articles presenting rather positive (1) and negative (2) information on SE (attitude condition) and articles featuring rather successful (3) or unsuccessful (4) role-models (PBC-condition). The participants were randomly assigned to one attitude and one PBC-condition each. I hypothesized that articles (i) conveying rather positive or negative information on SE (attitude condition) and (ii) featuring rather successful or unsuccessful SE-role models (PBC-condition) in and decrease SE-related attitudes and PBC. The MANCOVA-results suggest that there were higher SE-related PBC levels in the successful role model condition compared to the unsuccessful one. No effect was found for the attitude condition. Despite the study basing on convenience sampling,evidence for the influenceability of SE-related PBC by role models is provided. Future research should investigate the stability of the effect and examine other media forms like television or social media. The findings reveal that presenting appropriate SE role-models can be an effective part of SE-education and governmental programs.
- social entrepreneurship,
- media,
- experiment,
- Theory of Planned Behavior
Citation: Philipp Kruse. Spreading entrepreneurial news—investigating media influence on social entrepreneurial antecedents[J]. Green Finance, 2020, 2(3): 284-301. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020016

Related Papers:

Abstract

Attitude towards social entrepreneurship (SE),i.e. the positive or negative evaluation of this career and perceived behavioral control (PBC),i.e. the conviction that one is able to succeed as a social entrepreneur have been identified as suitable individual predictors for SE-intention,i.e. the intention to found an enterprise with the aspiration to generate revenue and address social problems. Recent research found evidence for external influences on attitudes,PBC,and SE-intention like culture or economic and political circumstances,however,to date no study has been conducted on the extent to which attitudes and PBC can be altered by external media-related influences. Investigating two students' samples (N_total = 345),a randomized 2 × 2 experimental design was used to examine the influence of newspaper articles on SE-related attitudes and PBC. The experiment featured four different conditions,namely articles presenting rather positive (1) and negative (2) information on SE (attitude condition) and articles featuring rather successful (3) or unsuccessful (4) role-models (PBC-condition). The participants were randomly assigned to one attitude and one PBC-condition each. I hypothesized that articles (i) conveying rather positive or negative information on SE (attitude condition) and (ii) featuring rather successful or unsuccessful SE-role models (PBC-condition) in and decrease SE-related attitudes and PBC. The MANCOVA-results suggest that there were higher SE-related PBC levels in the successful role model condition compared to the unsuccessful one. No effect was found for the attitude condition. Despite the study basing on convenience sampling,evidence for the influenceability of SE-related PBC by role models is provided. Future research should investigate the stability of the effect and examine other media forms like television or social media. The findings reveal that presenting appropriate SE role-models can be an effective part of SE-education and governmental programs.

References

[1]	Agha S (2003) The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception, perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS Care 15: 749-762. doi: 10.1080/09540120310001618603
[2]	Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 50: 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[3]	Amodio DM, Zinner LR, Harmon-Jones E (2007) Social psychological methods of emotion elicitation, In: J. Coan, & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion elicitation and assessment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-105.
[4]	Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40: 471-499. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939
[5]	Aronson E, Brewer MB, Carlsmith JM (1985) Experimentation in social psychology, In: G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: Random House, 441-486.
[6]	Bailey RA (2008) Design of comparative experiments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]	Bandura A (1965) Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. J Pers Soc Psychol 1: 589-595. doi: 10.1037/h0022070
[8]	Bandura A (1977a) Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
[9]	Bandura A (1977b) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84: 191-215.
[10]	Baron RA (2004) The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic "why" questions. J Bus Ventur 19: 221-239. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
[11]	Beasley KT, Bernadowski C (2019) An Examination of Reading Specialist Candidates' Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Behavior and Classroom Management: An Instrumental Case Study. Educ Sci 9: 76-84. doi: 10.3390/educsci9020076
[12]	Bennett WL (1981) Perception and cognition: An information-processing framework for politics, In: S. Long (Ed.), The Handbook of Political Behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
[13]	Borland RH (2011) Radical plumbers and PlayPumps: Objects in development, Dublin: Trinity University Press.
[14]	Bosco FA, Aguinis H, Singh K, et al. (2015) Correlational effect size benchmarks. J Appl Psychol 100: 431-449. doi: 10.1037/a0038047
[15]	Bosma N, Hessels J, Schutjens V, et al. (2012) Entrepreneurship and role models. J Econ Psychol 33: 410-424. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.004
[16]	Bradley JC, Waliczek TM, Zajicek JM (1999) Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. J Environ Educ 30: 17-21. doi: 10.1080/00958969909601873
[17]	Breuer T, Mavinga FB, Evans R, et al. (2017) Using video and theater to increase knowledge and change attitudes-Why are gorillas important to the world and to Congo? Am J Primatol 79: 1-10. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22692
[18]	Cheung CMK, Chiu PY, Lee MK (2011) Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Comput Human Behav 27: 1337-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
[19]	Chipeta EM, Koloba HA, Surujlal J (2016) Influence of Gender and Age on Social Entrepreneurship Intentions among University Students in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Gender Behav 14: 6885-6899.
[20]	Cinar R (2019) Delving into social entrepreneurship in universities: is it legitimate yet? Reg Stud Reg Sci 6: 217-232.
[21]	Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
[22]	Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, Houghton Mifflin Boston, MA.
[23]	Coppock A, Ekins E, Kirby D (2018) The long-lasting effects of newspaper op-eds on public opinion. Q J Polit Sci 13: 59-87. doi: 10.1561/100.00016112
[24]	Dean TJ, McMullen JS (2007) Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. J Bus Ventur 22: 50-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
[25]	Dietrich S, Heider D, Matschinger H, et al. (2006) Influence of newspaper reporting on adolescents' attitudes toward people with mental illness. Soc Psych Psych Epid 41: 318-322. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0026-y
[26]	Dupuy K, Ron J, Prakash A (2016) Hands Off My Regime! Governments' Restrictions on Foreign Aid to Non-Governmental Organizations in Poor and Middle-Income Countries. World Dev 84: 299-311. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001
[27]	Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
[28]	Entman RM (1989) How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. J Polit 51: 347-370. doi: 10.2307/2131346
[29]	Forster F, Grichnik D (2013) Social entrepreneurial intention formation of corporate volunteers. J Soc Entrep 4: 153-181.
[30]	Fuchs K, Werner A, Wallau F (2008) Entrepreneurship education in Germany and Sweden: what role do different school systems play? J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15: 365-381. doi: 10.1108/14626000810871736
[31]	Fuerlinger G, Fandl U, Funke T (2015) The role of the state in the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Insights from Germany. Triple Helix 2: 1-26. doi: 10.1186/s40604-014-0012-z
[32]	Gupta VK, Wieland AM, Turban DB (2019) Gender Characterizations in Entrepreneurship: A Multi‐Level Investigation of Sex‐Role Stereotypes about High‐Growth, Commercial, and Social Entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manage 57: 131-153. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12495
[33]	Hechavarría DM, Ingram A, Justo R, et al. (2012) Are Women More Likely to Pursue Social and Environmental Entrepreneurship, In: K. D. Hughes, & J. E. Jennings (Eds.), Global Women's Entrepreneurship Research: Diverse Settings, Questions and Approaches, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 135-151.
[34]	Hill CJ, Bloom HS, Black AR, et al. (2008) Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Dev Perspect 2: 172-177. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
[35]	Hockerts K (2017) Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 41: 105-130. doi: 10.1111/etap.12171
[36]	Hsu DK, Simmons SA, Wieland AM (2017) Designing entrepreneurship experiments: a review, typology, and research agenda. Organ Res Methods 20: 379-412. doi: 10.1177/1094428116685613
[37]	Jaén I, Fernández-Serrano J, Santos FJ, et al. (2017) Cultural values and social entrepreneurship: A cross-country efficiency analysis, In: M. Peris-Ortiz, F. Teulon, & D. Bonet-Fernandez (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors, Berlin: Springer, 31-51.
[38]	Jerit J, Barabas J, Clifford S (2013) Comparing contemporaneous laboratory and field experiments on media effects. Public Opinion Q 77: 256-282. doi: 10.1093/poq/nft005
[39]	Johannisson B, Nilsson A (1989) Community entrepreneurs: Networking for local development. Entrep Reg Dev 1: 3-19. doi: 10.1080/08985628900000002
[40]	Justo R, Lepoutre J, Terjesen S, et al. (2010) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) social entrepreneurship study: Methodology & Data. Small Bus Econ, 1-24.
[41]	Kagan J (1958) The concept of identification. Psychol Rev 65: 296-305. doi: 10.1037/h0041313
[42]	Kedmenec I, Strašek S (2017) Are some cultures more favourable for social entrepreneurship than others? Econ Res-Ekonomska istraživanja 30: 1461-1476.
[43]	Kibler E, Kautonen T, Fink M (2014) Regional social legitimacy of entrepreneurship: Implications for entrepreneurial intention and start-up behaviour. Reg Stud 48: 995-1015. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.851373
[44]	Kickul J, Gundry L, Mitra P, et al. (2018) Designing with purpose: advocating innovation, impact, sustainability, and scale in social entrepreneurship education. Entrep Educ Pedagogy 1: 205-221.
[45]	Kraus S, Filser M, O'Dwyer M, et al. (2014) Social entrepreneurship: An exploratory citation analysis. Rev Managerial Sci 8: 275-292. doi: 10.1007/s11846-013-0104-6
[46]	Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15: 411-432. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
[47]	Krumboltz JD, Mitchell AM, Jones GB (1976) A social learning theory of career selection. Counse Psychol 6: 71-81. doi: 10.1177/001100007600600117
[48]	Kruse P (2020) Can there only be one?-an empirical comparison of four models on social entrepreneurial intention formation. Int Entrep Manage J 16: 641-665.
[49]	Kruse P, Wach D, Costa S, et al. (2019) Values Matter, Don't They?-Combining Theory of Planned Behavior and Personal Values as Predictors of Social Entrepreneurial Intention. J Soc Entrep 10: 55-83.
[50]	Laviolette EM, Lefebvre MR, Brunel O (2012) The impact of story bound entrepreneurial role models on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Int J Entrep Behav Res 18: 720-742. doi: 10.1108/13552551211268148
[51]	Lee M, Battilana J, Wang T (2014) Building an infrastructure for empirical research on social enterprise: Challenges and opportunities. Soc Entrep Res Methods 9: 241-264.
[52]	Liñán F, Chen YW (2009) Development and Cross‐Cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 33: 593-617. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
[53]	Lutz RJ (1975) Changing brand attitudes through modification of cognitive structure. J Consum Res 1: 49-59. doi: 10.1086/208607
[54]	Milanovic B (2011) The Haves and the Have-Nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality, New York: Basic Books.
[55]	Nga KHJ, Shamuganathan G (2010) The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start-up intentions. J Bus Ethics 95: 259-282. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8
[56]	O'Loughlin I, Blaszczynski A (2018) Comparative effects of differing media presented advertisements on male youth gambling attitudes and intentions. Int J Mental Health Addict 16:313-327. doi: 10.1007/s11469-017-9753-z
[57]	Perrini F, Vurro C, Costanzo LA (2010) A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano. Entrep Reg Dev 22: 515-534. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2010.488402
[58]	Prabhu VP, McGuire SJ, Kwong KK, et al. (2017) Social entrepreneurship among Millennials: A three-country comparative study. Aust Acad Accounting Financ Rev 2: 323-353.
[59]	Prieto LC (2011) The influence of proactive personality on social entrepreneurial intentions among African-American and Hispanic undergraduate students: The moderating role of hope. Acad Entrep J 17: 77-96.
[60]	Reis TK, Clohesy SJ (2001) Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A philanthropic renaissance. New Dir Philanthropic Fundraising 2001: 109-144. doi: 10.1002/pf.3206
[61]	Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values, New York: Free Press.
[62]	Rowley J (2002) Using case studies in research. Manage Res News 25: 16-27. doi: 10.1108/01409170210782990
[63]	Saebi T, Foss NJ, Linder S (2019) Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. J Manage 45: 70-95.
[64]	Saleem N, Hanan MA, Saleem I, et al. (2014) Career Selection: Role of Parent's Profession, Mass Media and Personal Choice. Bull Educ Res 36: 25-37.
[65]	Sassmannshausen SP, Volkmann C (2018) The scientometrics of social entrepreneurship and its establishment as an academic field. J Small Bus Manage 56: 251-273. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12254
[66]	Schulze B, Richter-Werling M, Matschinger H, et al. (2003) Crazy? So what! Effects of a school project on students' attitudes towards people with schizophrenia. Acta Psych Scand 107: 142-150.
[67]	Short JC, Moss TW, Lumpkin GT (2009) Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strat Entrep J 3: 161-194. doi: 10.1002/sej.69
[68]	Smith IH, Woodworth WP (2012) Developing social entrepreneurs and social innovators: A social identity and self-efficacy approach. Acad Manage Learn Educ 11: 390-407. doi: 10.5465/amle.2011.0016
[69]	Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, et al. (1999) In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci 2: 859-861. doi: 10.1038/13154
[70]	Stone J, Cooper J (2001) A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. J Exp Soc Psychol 37: 228-243. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1446
[71]	Taylor GA (2018) One-for-One companies: Helpful or harmful? IU J Undergrad Res 4: 63-72. doi: 10.14434/iujur.v4i1.24398
[72]	Thompson J, Doherty B (2006) The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories. Int J Soc Econ 33: 361-375. doi: 10.1108/03068290610660643
[73]	Thompson N, Kiefer K, York JG (2011) Distinctions not dichotomies: Exploring social, sustainable and environmental entrepreneurship, In: G. T. Lumpkin, & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Social and sustainable entrepreneurship: Advances in entrepreneurship, firm, emergence and growth, Bingley, UK: Emerald, 201-229.
[74]	Tiwari P, Bhat AK, Tikoria J (2017) An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions. J Global Entrep Res 7: 9. doi: 10.1186/s40497-017-0067-1
[75]	Tracey P, Phillips N (2007) The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Acad Manage Learn Educ 6: 264-271. doi: 10.5465/amle.2007.25223465
[76]	Urban B (2013) Social entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: A focus on the institutional environment and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Managing Global Transitions Int Res J 11: 3-26.
[77]	Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2013) The differential susceptibility to media effects model. J Commun 63: 221-243. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12024
[78]	Venkataraman S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Adv Entrep Firm Emergence Growth 3: 119-138.
[79]	Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annu Rev Sociol 35: 493-511. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115926
[80]	Wroblewski R, Huston AC (1987) Televised occupational stereotypes and their effects on early adolescents: Are they changing? J Early Adolesc 7: 283-297. doi: 10.1177/0272431687073005
[81]	Wry T, York JG (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad Manage Rev 42: 437-460. doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0506
[82]	Yang R, Meyskens M, Zheng C, et al. (2015) Social Entrepreneurial Intentions: China versus the USA-Is There a Difference? Inter J Entrep Innovation 16: 253-267.
[83]	Young DR (1983) If not for profit, for what? Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
[84]	Yunus M (1999) The Grameen Bank. Sci Am 281: 114-119. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1199-114
[85]	Zellweger T, Sieger P, Halter F (2011) Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. J Bus Ventur 26: 521-536.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)