Land use change, policy dynamics and urban governance: A case study of urban village redevelopment in Shenzhen

Xuan Tu; Xukun Zhang; Xuan Tu; Xukun Zhang

doi:10.3934/urs.2023015

Urban Resilience and Sustainability

2023, Volume 1, Issue 3: 235-250. doi: 10.3934/urs.2023015

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Land use change, policy dynamics and urban governance: A case study of urban village redevelopment in Shenzhen

Xuan Tu ¹,
Xukun Zhang ^{2
,
,}

1.
Department of Public administration, Jiangsu Administration Institute, 210002, Nanjing, China
2.
College of Social Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China

Received: 22 August 2023 Revised: 25 September 2023 Accepted: 02 October 2023 Published: 18 October 2023

Urbanization in China is a complex process. The expansion of urbanization has pushed the government to tackle the long existed rural/urban divide by redeveloping urban villages. However, not many studies have focused on the relationship between urban redevelopment and urban governance in relation to specific policy elements, that is, how land use change and policy dynamics reinforce urban governance. By conducting a case study of urban redevelopment in Shenzhen, this article first evaluates the redevelopment background, theoretical perspectives on land use and the policy context of urban villages. Based on the analysis of the case, it was concluded that land use change has played a significant role in urban governance, in which the policy dynamics of urban villages in China are crucial to understanding the redevelopment process. Findings show that an integrated approach was adopted to redevelop the village, which combined both government and community forces. Furthermore, the forces of land use change and the policy dynamics manifested in a co-management process engaged by stakeholders, and eventually reinforced urban governance.
- land use,
- policy dynamics,
- urban governance,
- urban village redevelopment,
- China
Citation: Xuan Tu, Xukun Zhang. Land use change, policy dynamics and urban governance: A case study of urban village redevelopment in Shenzhen[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2023, 1(3): 235-250. doi: 10.3934/urs.2023015

Related Papers:

Abstract

Urbanization in China is a complex process. The expansion of urbanization has pushed the government to tackle the long existed rural/urban divide by redeveloping urban villages. However, not many studies have focused on the relationship between urban redevelopment and urban governance in relation to specific policy elements, that is, how land use change and policy dynamics reinforce urban governance. By conducting a case study of urban redevelopment in Shenzhen, this article first evaluates the redevelopment background, theoretical perspectives on land use and the policy context of urban villages. Based on the analysis of the case, it was concluded that land use change has played a significant role in urban governance, in which the policy dynamics of urban villages in China are crucial to understanding the redevelopment process. Findings show that an integrated approach was adopted to redevelop the village, which combined both government and community forces. Furthermore, the forces of land use change and the policy dynamics manifested in a co-management process engaged by stakeholders, and eventually reinforced urban governance.

References

[1]	Zhang T (2002) Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in Shanghai. Urban Aff Rev 4: 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870222185432 doi: 10.1177/10780870222185432
[2]	Wu F, Li LH, Han SY (2018) Social sustainability and redevelopment of urban villages in China: A case study of Guangzhou. Sustainability 10: 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072116 doi: 10.3390/su10072116
[3]	Chung H (2010) Building an image of Villages-in-the-City: A clarification of China's distinct urban spaces. Int J Urban Regional 34: 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00979.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00979.x
[4]	Liu Y, He S, Wu F, et al. (2010) Urban villages under China's rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhoods. Habitat Int 34: 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.08.003
[5]	Lai Y, Tang B (2016) Institutional barriers to redevelopment of urban villages in China: A transaction cost perspective. Land Use Policy 58: 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.009
[6]	Lai Y, Wang J, Lok W (2017) Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy 69: 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046
[7]	Hao P, Hooimeijer P, Sliuzas R, et al. (2013) What drives the spatial development of urban villages in China? Urban Stud 50: 3394–3411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484534 doi: 10.1177/0042098013484534
[8]	Tang B (2015) "Not rural but not urban": Community governance in China's urban villages. China Quart 223: 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000843 doi: 10.1017/S0305741015000843
[9]	Liu X, Liang W (1997) Zhejiangcun: Social and spatial implications of informal urbanization on the periphery of Beijing. Cities 14: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(96)00047-9 doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(96)00047-9
[10]	Zhang L (2001) Strangers in the City: Reconfigurations of Space, Power, and Social Networks Within China's Floating Population. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 25–39.
[11]	Liu Y, Zhu AX, Wang J, et al. (2019) Land-use decision support in brownfield redevelopment for urban renewal based on crowdsourced data and a presence-and-background learning (PBL) method. Land Use Policy 88: 104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104188 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104188
[12]	Wang YP, Wang Y, Wu J (2009) Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen. Int J Urban Regional 33: 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00891.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00891.x
[13]	Yan X, Wei L (2004) The persistence or transformation of urban villages in urban China. Petermanns Geor Mitt 148: 60–67.
[14]	Hao P, Sliuzas R, Geertman S (2011) The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat Int 35: 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.001
[15]	He S, Liu Y, Webster C, et al. (2009) Property rights redistribution, entitlement failure and the impoverishment of landless farmers in China. Urban Stud 46: 1925–1949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009106015 doi: 10.1177/0042098009106015
[16]	Jacobs J (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House, 55–59.
[17]	Batty M, Besussi E, Maat K, et al. (2004) Representing multifunctional cities: Density and diversity in space and time. Built Environ 30: 324–337. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.324.57156 doi: 10.2148/benv.30.4.324.57156
[18]	Rodenburg CA, Nijkamp P (2004) Multifunctional land use in the city: A typological overview. Built Environ 30: 274–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24026082
[19]	Hao P, Geertman S, Hooimeijer P, et al. (2012) The land-use diversity in urban villages in Shenzhen. Environ Plann A 44: 2742–2764. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44696 doi: 10.1068/a44696
[20]	Duany A, Plater-Zyberk E, Speck J (2000) Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press, 3–10.
[21]	Turcu C (2013) Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. J Environ Plann Man 56: 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984 doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.698984
[22]	Munda G (2006) Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23: 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.012
[23]	Long H, Heilig GK, Li X, et al. (2007) Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China. Land Use Policy 24: 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.003
[24]	Lewis PG, Marantz NJ (2019) What planners know: Using surveys about local land use regulation to understand housing development. J Am Plann Assoc 85: 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1643253 doi: 10.1080/01944363.2019.1643253
[25]	Alexander J, Ehlers Smith DA, Ehlers Smith YC, et al. (2019) Drivers of fine-scale avian functional diversity with changing land use: An assessment of the effects of eco-estate housing development and management. Landscape Ecol 34: 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00786-y doi: 10.1007/s10980-019-00786-y
[26]	Ho P (2001) Who owns China's land? Policies, property rights and deliberate institutional ambiguity. China Quart 166: 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443901000195 doi: 10.1017/S0009443901000195
[27]	Zhou Q (2017) Urban–Rural in China: Revised Edition. Beijing: China CITIC Press, 33–41.
[28]	North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
[29]	Wang H, Tong J, Su F, et al. (2011) To reallocate or not: Reconsidering the dilemma in China's agricultural land tenure policy. Land Use Policy 28: 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.006
[30]	Smith N (1979) Toward a theory of gentrification a back to the city movement by capital, not people. J Am Plann Assoc 45: 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002 doi: 10.1080/01944367908977002
[31]	Liu Y, Fang F, Li Y (2014) Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy 40: 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.013 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.013
[32]	Long H, Li Y, Liu Y, et al. (2012) Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by 'increasing vs. decreasing balance' land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy 29: 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.04.003
[33]	Liu Y, Wu F, Liu Y, et al. (2017) Changing neighbourhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Urban Geogr 38: 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842 doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842
[34]	Liu Y (2018) Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China. Land Use Policy 74: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.032 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.032
[35]	Altrock U, Schoon S (2013) Maturing Megacities: The Pearl River Delta in Progressive Transformation. Springer Science & Business Media, 1–10.
[36]	Yin RK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications Design and methods. Sage Publications, 1–9.
[37]	Lin Y, Hao P, Geertman S (2015) A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese 'villages in the city'. Urban Stud 52: 1774–1790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014540345 doi: 10.1177/0042098014540345
[38]	Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia: Open University, 46–59.
[39]	Driessen PPJ, Dieperink C, van Laerhoven F, et al. (2012) Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance—experiences from the Netherlands. Environ Policy Gov 22: 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580 doi: 10.1002/eet.1580
[40]	Yuan D, Yau Y, Bao H, et al. (2019) Anatomizing the institutional arrangements of urban village redevelopment: Case studies in Guangzhou, China. Sustainability 11: 3376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123376 doi: 10.3390/su11123376
[41]	Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90: 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
[42]	Fabricius C, Currie B (2015) Adaptive co-management. In: Allen, C.R., Garmestani, A.S., Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems, Netherlands: Springer, 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_9
[43]	Loeffler E, Bovaird T (2016) User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? Int J Public Admin 39: 1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559 doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
[44]	Kovács E, Mile O, Fabók V, et al. (2021) Fostering adaptive co-management with stakeholder participation in the surroundings of soda pans in Kiskunság, Hungary—An assessment. Land Use Policy 100: 104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104894 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104894
[45]	Cheng J (2021) Analysis of commercial land leasing of the district governments of Beijing in China. Land Use Policy 100: 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104881 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104881
[46]	Liu Y, Yang Y, Li Y, et al. (2017) Conversion from rural settlements and arable land under rapid urbanization in Beijing during 1985–2010. J Rural Stud 51: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.008

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)