Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Review Special Issues

Plant probiotic bacteria enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops

  • Received: 30 March 2017 Accepted: 12 June 2017 Published: 19 June 2017
  • The negative effects on the environment and human health caused by the current farming systems based on the overuse of chemical fertilizers have been reported in many studies. By contrast, bacterial inoculations produce positive effects on yields without causing this type of harm. Hence, during recent years, the commercialization of biofertilizers has been on the increase, and the number of companies and products available are expanding worldwide every year. In addition to the notable enhancement of crop production, many studies have shown how the application of bacteria has positive effects on food quality such as improved vitamin, flavonoid and antioxidant content, among other benefits. This advantage is interesting with respect to food that is consumed raw, such as fruits and many vegetables, as these bioactive molecules are maintained up until the moment the food is consumed. As regards this review focuses on the collection of studies that demonstrate that microorganisms can act as plant probiotics of fruit and horticultural crops, essential types of food that form part of a healthy diet.

    Citation: Alejandro Jiménez-Gómez, Lorena Celador-Lera, María Fradejas-Bayón, Raúl Rivas. Plant probiotic bacteria enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 483-501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.483

    Related Papers:

    [1] Esther Menendez, Paula Garcia-Fraile . Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502
    [2] Luis R. Silva, Catarina Bento, Ana Carolina Gonçalves, José David Flores-Félix, Martha Helena Ramírez-Bahena, Alvaro Peix, Encarna Velázquez . Legume bioactive compounds: influence of rhizobial inoculation. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 267-278. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.267
    [3] Shubhra Singh, Douglas J. H. Shyu . Perspective on utilization of Bacillus species as plant probiotics for different crops in adverse conditions. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 220-238. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024011
    [4] Nilde Antonella Di Benedetto, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Daniela Campaniello, Mariagrazia Pia Cataldi, Antonio Bevilacqua, Milena Sinigaglia, Zina Flagella . The role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 413-434. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413
    [5] Naoual Bouremani, Hafsa Cherif-Silini, Allaoua Silini, Nour El Houda Rabhi, Ali Chenari Bouket, Lassaad Belbahri . Osmotolerant plant growth promoting bacteria mitigate adverse effects of drought stress on wheat growth. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 507-541. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024025
    [6] Monyck Jeane dos Santos Lopes, Aline Figueiredo Cardoso, Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho, Ely Simone Cajueiro Gurgel, Gisele Barata da Silva . Brazilian Amazonian microorganisms: A sustainable alternative for plant development. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 150-166. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025008
    [7] Sabrine Balti, Yassine Mabrouk, Mouna Souihi, Imen Hemissi, Ismail Amri, Ethan Humm, Noor Khan, Ann M. Hirsch . Combined inoculation of rhizobacteria with Mesorhizobium promotes growth, nutrient contents, and protects chickpea against Fusarium redolens. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(2): 318-337. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025015
    [8] Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
    [9] Alexandra Díez-Méndez, Raul Rivas . Improvement of saffron production using Curtobacterium herbarum as a bioinoculant under greenhouse conditions. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 354-364. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.354
    [10] Amel Balla, Allaoua Silini, Hafsa Cherif-Silini, Francesca Mapelli, Sara Borin . Root colonization dynamics of alginate encapsulated rhizobacteria: implications for Arabidopsis thaliana root growth and durum wheat performance. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 87-125. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025006
  • The negative effects on the environment and human health caused by the current farming systems based on the overuse of chemical fertilizers have been reported in many studies. By contrast, bacterial inoculations produce positive effects on yields without causing this type of harm. Hence, during recent years, the commercialization of biofertilizers has been on the increase, and the number of companies and products available are expanding worldwide every year. In addition to the notable enhancement of crop production, many studies have shown how the application of bacteria has positive effects on food quality such as improved vitamin, flavonoid and antioxidant content, among other benefits. This advantage is interesting with respect to food that is consumed raw, such as fruits and many vegetables, as these bioactive molecules are maintained up until the moment the food is consumed. As regards this review focuses on the collection of studies that demonstrate that microorganisms can act as plant probiotics of fruit and horticultural crops, essential types of food that form part of a healthy diet.


    1. Introduction

    Modern farming systems used worldwide to satisfy the increasing demand for food require the extensive use of chemical fertilizers, which are not only very costly but produce many environmental and human health problems [1]. Also, consumers have become more aware of different food production systems and food safety and quality [2]. In recent years, new production methods to ensure food quality have been investigated, addressing a key area within the European political agenda [3]. Due to general environmental awareness, these new methods are often in line with the ideology of green politics, and many countries have implemented these methods and have included them within their legislation.

    Currently, there are many studies that have analysed increased crop production following the use of several bacterial strains. And, there is also a significant number of studies that not only show increased total yield productions, but also the nutritional benefits achieved by the application of biofertilizers on plants and the role of bacteria in improving the quality of crops [4].

    Recently, the plant-associated microorganisms which cause beneficial effects have been defined as "Plant Probiotic" [5,6]. Plant probiotics are microorganisms that confer benefits to the health of plants when administered in specific amounts [7]. In addition, they belong to the bacterial group "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria" (PGPR) which are able to colonize plant roots [8,9], promote plant growth through different direct and indirect mechanisms [1,10], improve plant nutritional content [11,12] and increase crop quality [13,14].

    However, it is known that in order to achieve benefits to plants, the selection of efficient and specific PGPR is required. Therefore, the complex interactions between plants, bacteria and environmental factors need to be understood. Environment factors such as inorganic mineral content and plant exudates are associated with the growth and establishment of bacteria [15,16]. Thus, the microbial communities associated with plants depend on ecosystem development [16]. Understanding how microbial communities colonize plant roots [17] and the interactions and mechanisms of biofertilizers is essential if plant quality is to be improved [18]. Another key factor is to ensure the non-pathogenicity of the microorganisms used in biofertilization processes, with the aim to avoid problems to human health or the environment [19].

    Among current food guidelines, one of the new initiatives is based on the consumption of vegetables and fruits rich in bioactive substances. These substances are able to express anticarcinogenic effects and prevent various diseases and health disorders [20]. Consequently, the beneficial effects of bioactive substances on human health have been analysed in several studies [5,21]. Moreover, the high consumption of these types of foods is recommended for a healthy diet. For example, berries provide significant health benefits owing to the high level of vitamins, minerals and antioxidants they contain [20]. In addition, berries are readily available and can be consumed in a wide range of forms, such as fresh or frozen, and can be found in food products like jam and yogurt [22]. On the other hand, horticultural crops provide humans with a large variety of indispensable vitamins, such as A and C, and elements such as potassium [23]. According to Ramsay et al. [24], consumption of a variety of fruits and vegetables is linked to overall diet quality.

    This review focuses on improved crop quality after the application of plant probiotic bacteria as enhancers of the nutritional value of fruits and horticultural crops.


    2. Impact of Bacterial Probiotics on Plant Nutrient Content

    Vitamins are among the nutrients required for many physiological functions essential to life. Despite being presented in minute amounts on food, vitamins prevent specific deficiency syndromes which can affect people when there is an absence or a reduction of their contents [25]. Moreover, vitamin deficiency in humans can produce several diseases such as ocular surface abnormalities [26] or neurodegenerative problems [27]. Due to the importance of vitamins, one of the proposals presented by the World Health Organization (WHO) is to improve the content of essential vitamins in food in order to decrease worldwide malnutrition [28]. Therefore, scientists are searching for different ways to increase the total content of these types of substances in crops. Here, some of the studies in which bacterial plant probiotic inoculation has been used to increase the vitamin content of fruits and horticultural crops (Table 1) are presented.

    Table 1. Plant probiotic bacteria used to enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops.
    Bacterial strain Fruit or horticultural crop Crop effects caused Reference
    Phyllobacterium sp. PEPV15 Fragraria x ananassa Enhancement of vitamin C [5]
    Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3 Fragraria x ananassa Enhancement of vitamin C [30]
    Paenibacillus polymyxa Fragraria x ananassa Enhancement of vitamin C [31]
    Pseudomonas sp. 19Fv1T Lycopersicon esculentum Enhancement of vitamin C [32]
    Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Lycopersicon esculentum Enhancement of vitamin C [33]
    Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB2 and B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Lycopersicon esculentum Enhancement of vitamin C [34]
    Pseudomonas sp. 5Vm1K and AMF Fragaria × ananassa Enhancement of vitamin B and C [36]
    Pseudomonas putida 41, Azotobacter chroococcum5, Azospirillum lipoferum OF and AMF Lycopersicon esculentum Increased antioxidant activity [52]
    Bacillus licheniformis Lycopersicon esculentum Improved total flavonoids content [14]
    Pseudomonas putida 41, Azotobacterchroococcum5, Azospirillum lipoferum OF Ocimum basilicum Increased antioxidant activity [42]
    Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus lentus and Azospirillum brasilens. Ocimum basilicum Increased antioxidant activity and chlorophyll leaf content [43]
    Rhizobium leguminosarum PETP01 Capsicum annuum Increased antioxidant activity [44]
    Pseudomonas fluorescens N21.4 Rubus sp. Increased flavonoids concentration [13]
    Rhizobium sp. PEPV12 Spinacia oleracea. Increase chlorophyll content [9]
    Paenibacillus polymyxa RC14 Brassica oleracea var capitata cv Yalova 1. N, P, K, S, Fe, and Cu content increase [12]
    Bacillus subtilis BA-142, Bacillus megaeorium-GC subgroup A. MFD-2, Acinetobacter baumannii CD-1 and Pantoea agglomerans FF Lycopersicon esculentum L. and Cucumis sativus L. N, P, Mg, Ca, Na, K, Cu, Mn, Fe and Zn content increase in both fruit [114]
    Bacillus subtilis EY2, Bacillus atrophaeus EY6, Bacillus spharicus GC subgroup B EY30, Staphylococcus kloosii EY37, and Kocuriaerythromyxa EY43 Fragaria x ananassa. N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Cu and Fe [115]
    Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bradyrhizobium sp. Origanum majorana Increase the amount of essentials oils [65]
    Bacillus megaterium, Pantoea agglomerans and Bacillus subtilis Brassica oleracea Increase chlorophyll plant content [116]
    Pseudomonas fluorescens N21.4 Rubus sp. var Lochness Increase and stabilize total flavonoid content during different season [79]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Vitamin C is the vitamin with the highest recommended daily dose and L-Ascorbic acid (AsA) is derived from L-threo-hex-2-enono-1, 4-lactone. Some mammals cannot synthesize AsA due to the lack of functionality of the gene that encodes the enzyme which catalyses its biosynthesis [29]. The results obtained by Flores-Félix et al. [5] showed that vitamin C levels were significantly higher (79% compare to the control) in strawberries obtained from plants inoculated with the strain Phyllobacterium sp. PEPV15. Moreover, Pirlak et al. [30] compare the results obtained, depending on the type of inoculation, and report that the highest levels of vitamin C in strawberry were obtained by applying root and foliar application in comparison with the uninoculated treatment were higher. The strains used in these experiments were Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3. Erturk et al. [31] also showed high levels of vitamin C content in strawberry fruits after plants were inoculated with Paenibacillus polymyxa RC05.

    Increased levels of vitamin C after bacterial treatment have also been described for vegetables. For instance, Bona et al. [30] shows that inoculation with the strain Pseudomonas sp. 19Fv1T not only enhances yield but also positively affects the concentration of vitamin C in tomato fruits in comparison with the control treatment. Additionally, Shen et al. [33] shows that vermicompost combined with plant probiotic Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens also increases tomato yield and vitamin C contents. According to Gül et al. [34], the highest levels of vitamin C content in tomato fruits were obtained after the inoculation of two bacterial strains Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (FZB2 and FZB42) in different treatments.

    Berry crops are regarded as a good source of vitamins in addition to their anticarcinogenic and antimutagenic properties [22,35]. In this sense, Bona et al. [36] analyses the improvement of vitamin B9 and vitamin C content in strawberry fruits after the inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and different strains of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB). They showed significant differences in ascorbic acid levels compared to the control after the inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. 5Vm1K, a mixture of AMF, and a co-inoculation formed by AMF and Pseudomonas sp. 5Vm1K. However, the vitamin B9 content was only significant higher after double co-inoculation with AMF and PGPB.

    Moreover, in the literature it is known that some vitamins also have antioxidants effects, being substances that interfere with normal oxidation processes, such as oxygen scavengers, promoting a more favourable anaerobic environment [37]. Thus, plant antioxidants are one of the most active food compounds [38] and are present in vegetables like tomato, carrot, cabbage, red beets and fruits as cocoa, prunes, red grapes and citrus fruits [39]. These substances can be classified into two different groups according to their mode of action: chemical substances which interrupt free radical chain propagation, and oxygen scavengers and chelators which bind to ions involved in the formation of free radicals [39].

    Here, we present some of the studies published on fruit and horticultural crops that have shown a significant increase in antioxidant activity after being inoculated with plant probiotic bacteria (Table 1).

    Tomato, one of the most cultivate vegetables in the world, is among the vegetables and horticultural used in these types of studies [40]. Moreover, tomatoes are regarded as an excellent source of antioxidant compounds [32,41]. Ochoa-Velasco et al. [14] compared the different levels of total antioxidant content in tomato fruits after biofertilization with Bacillus licheniformis and different doses of a nitrogen fertilizer. In general terms, they describe an improvement in the quality of tomato fruits with respect to total hydrophilic antioxidant compounds (vitamin C and total phenols) after inoculation with B. licheniformes and the reduction of the nitrogen doses.

    The bacterial effects on antioxidant activity have also been analysed in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). This medicinal plant is used worldwide in cooking, and its antioxidant activity has been investigated after different treatments. The inoculation of basil with a mixture of Pseudomonas putida 41, Azotobacter chroococcum 5, Azospirillum lipoferum OF strains presented the highest level of antioxidant activity [42] as compared to the control treatment. In addition, another study involving basil reported that, under water stress, inoculation with three bacterial species (Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus lentus and Azospirillum brasilens) also increased antioxidant activity (Catalase and guaiacol peroxidise activity), as well as a significant change in leaf chlorophyll content [43].

    Peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) are also considered as an excellent dietary source of antioxidant compounds, in addition to being an economically important agricultural crop. In the study published by Silva et al. [44], pepper extracts were tested against 1, 1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazy, superoxide (O2 •−), and nitric oxide (NO) radicals. The results showed a significant difference between the extract from the fruits of inoculated plants and the extracts from uninoculated plants. Also, higher antioxidant activity was found in peppers from plants inoculated with the strain Rhizobium leguminosarum PETP01.

    Antioxidant activity has also been analysed in fruits. And, strawberries have been found to be a good source of antioxidants. The anthocyanin content is in part responsible for the antioxidant power in berries [45]. Lingua et al. [46] reported that the co-inoculation of plant growth promoting bacterial strains and mycorrhizal fungi on strawberry plants produced the best levels of anthocyanin content in strawberries.

    Carotenoids are natural pigments which belong to the second group of antioxidants. They are involved in indispensable roles in photoprotection, stress and photosynthesis, in addition to acting as precursors of vitamin A [47,48]. Some carotenoids compounds have been reported to prevent humans from developing certain cancers and cardiovascular diseases. These compounds also protect plants against photooxidative damage and contribute to maintaining the plants overall structure.

    Lycopene is a red carotenoid that is an intermediate in the biosynthesis of other carotenoids, such as β-carotene [49], and is an effective free radical scavenger. Also, its presence in the human diet is correlated with a reduction in the incidence of cancer [3,50]. Lycopene is involved in the reddening of the tomato due to its function in the differentiation of chloroplasts and chromoplasts. In addition, lycopene is important in the final nutritional quality of this plant product [51]. With regard to the importance of carotenoids, during the past years scientists have being analyzing the way to improve their contents in crops by using fertilizers based on bacterial plant probiotics. Ordookhani et al. [52] concluded that the inoculation of tomato plants with Pseudomonas putida 41, Azotobacter chroococcum 5, Azospirillum lipoferum OF and a mixture of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (Glomus lipoferum, Glomus mossea and Glomus etunicatum) increased lycopene antioxidant levels. Moreover a positive correlation between lycopene and fruit potassium content was found in tomato plants after inoculation.

    In order to increase crop yield, large amounts of N and P are required and excessive amounts are applied to the soil, causing significant environmental pollution as a result of nitrate leaching [53]. To reduce these adverse effects, PGPR bacteria can be used as an alternative to chemical fertilizers as they can improve plant growth through plant nutrient uptake and thus improving crop production [54].

    PGPRs have direct mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, phytohormones production, among others, that facilitate the availability and absorption of nutrients [55,56].

    Plant growth promoting bacteria are used in numerous studies which also have such mechanisms as nitrogen fixing bacteria [57]. Consequently, the increase of N content may produce a greater uptake of nutrients present in the soil by the plant and an increase of the plant nutrient element (PNE) contents, improving the quality of the crops [58].

    Many studies use PGPR microorganisms to improve the quality of various crops by increasing the PNE content. For example, the increase in Ca content produces a more rigid peel when fruit is ripe. On the other hand, an increase in K content leads to an increase in the translocation of carbohydrates from the leaves to the fruit and, consequently, a higher fruit volume is obtained [59]. Some studies have evaluated the nutritional content of fruits and crops after inoculation with PGPR bacteria.

    Broccoli is a vegetable rich in dietary fiber, nutrients and several phytochemicals with proposed health-related properties [11]. Yildirim et al. [58] inoculated broccoli roots with the PGPR bacteria (Bacillus cereus, Brevibacillus reuszeri and Rhizobium rubi) to evaluate if they had any additional effect on crop growth and nutrient uptake. The results obtained from the inoculated plants showed an increase in chlorophyll, N, K, Ca, S, P, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu contents. In addition, crop yield increased by 17.0%, 20.2% and 24.3% and the chlorophyll content by 14.7%, 14.0% and 13.7% in treatments inoculated with Bacillus cereus, Rhizobium rubi and Brevibacillus reuszeri, respectively.

    As mentioned above, tomato fruit is one of the most consumed vegetables in the world, either fresh or processed [60]. Sharafzadeh [61] performed a greenhouse test, inoculating tomato plants with different combinations of PGPRs such as Pseudomonas, Azotobacter and Azosprillum. The result obtained from 5 out of the 7 inoculated treatments showed an increase in the nutrient content of N, P, K, Ca and Mg.

    Vayssières et al. [62] obtained similar yields of banana crops in two experiments: a treatment with a nitrogen fertilizer (100%) and another treatment involving inoculation with PGPB and lower nitrogen fertilizer conditions (33%). The results showed that the inoculations with Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 and Bacillus sphericus UPMB10 improved fruit yield and fruit quality under the reduced fertilizer conditions. The nutrients which were shown to be increased in the treatments with the PGPB were N, P, K, Ca and Mg. Thus, it was concluded that these strains could be used as biofertilizers to improve banana production and quality.


    3. Effects of Plant Probiotics Bacteria on Flavonoids, Organic Acids and Volatile Compounds Levels

    Plants usually produce organic compounds as root exudates. These compounds are usually metabolites from different metabolic routes such as flavonoids, organic acids, sterols and volatile compounds [63]. They have diverse functions in plants like providing protection against pathogens [64,65,66,67] or abiotic stresses [68], as well as increasing the nutrient content of plants [69] and therefore their quality. The concentration of these metabolites in plant tissues varies depending on their biosynthesis, storage and degradation processes [63]. Furthermore, some of these compounds can be beneficial to human health when consumed in large quantities, thus they are important not only for the food industry but also for pharmaceutics companies [70].

    Flavonoids are the largest group of phenolic compounds that are abundantly present in plants, and are one of the major groups of plant secondary metabolites [71]. They are considered as having a wide range of biochemical and pharmacological properties. Recently, the analysis of flavonoid content in plants has received considerable attention due to fact that these substances possess biological properties, such as chemoprevention [72], and its role in the protection against diseases [73,74]. In addition, they are known to present antifungical, antibacterial and antiviral effects [75]. Considering all of the beneficial effects of flavonoids on human health, several research projects have been mentioned in the literature where scientists attempt to enhance flavonoid content by bacterial inoculation of crops with special economic interest.

    Since fruits are regarded as a good source of flavonoids, Basu and Maier [76] analysed the flavonoid content in different species of berries crops, showing that all of their antioxidant activity had the potential to improve human health. Blackberry is an important type of berry, which provides beneficial health effects [77]. García-Seco et al. [78] shows that the inoculation of blackberry plants with the strain Pseudomonas fluorescens N21.4 improves flavonoid content by 22%, as compared to the control treatment, during a specific period of the year (from July through October). Taking these results into account, Ramos-Solano et al. [79] analysed the effect of the bacterial probiotic inoculation on plant quality throughout the year and reports that the strain N21.4 tends to increase and stabilize total flavonoid content in blackberry crops, even when environmental conditions are adverse. Moreover, García-Seco et al. [13] reported that the blackberry root treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens N21.4 not only increased the expression of flavonoids biosynthetic genes, but also flavonoid concentration in fruits. In the research published by Ghorbanpour et al. [80], several Pseudomonas fluorescens strains were also analysed with the intention of determining their role on plant growth and flavonoids production in other type of crops. They showed that the inoculation with the strain Pseudomonas fluorescens Ap14 induced a significantly higher flavonoid content in comparison with the uninoculated control treatment. Apart from enhancing the berries overall quality, bacterial probiotics have been reported to delay fungal growth [81].

    Beneficial effects in horticultural crops have also been shown. Silva et al. [44] showed that aqueous extracts of Capsicum annuum leaves, after the bacterial inoculation with the rhizobium strain TVP08, presented a significant acetylcholinesterease (AchE) inhibitory activity (with an important relevance in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease). This result could be explained by the presence of flavonoids.

    Moreover, improved total flavonoid content has been described in fruit and horticultural species, and also in other types of crops such as buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Singh et al. [82] showed that buckwheat inoculated with Azospirillum spp. and Azotobacter spp. produces increased concentrations of flavonoid and phenolic contents.

    Organic acids play an important role in plant responses to nutrient stress, and their content in plants depends of their nutritional status [83]. Organic acids (glutamic, tartaric, quinic, malonic, malic, shikimic, a-ketoglutaric, pyruvic, citric, succinic and fumaric acids) are widely distributed in fruits (melon, grape, peach, orange, lemon) and vegetables (green and red pepper, tomato, lettuce and lamb's lettuce) and influence the nutritional state, quality food and organoleptic properties like aroma, color and flavor [69].

    Typically, roots exudates contain many organic acids such as acetate, malate, aconitate, lactate, fumarate, isocitrate, oxalate, citrate and succinate. These compounds are the primary anion components and make up a complex mixture of metal cations in solution; this in turn allows for the displacement of anions from the soil matrix and the mobilization of micronutrients like Zn and Cu into the rhizosphere [84].

    Citrate and malate are involved in nutrient acquisition, and form potent complexes with Fe in soil and induce the dissolution of unavailable insoluble ferric oxyhydroxides. Moreover, they are the primary components released into the rhizosphere under P deficiency [84]. It has been shown that some PGPR can promote plant growth by capturing nutrients, since these bacteria produce an increase of organic acids in the roots of plants. For example, in strawberry crops the application of Bacillus and Pseudomonas strains produce an increase in plant biomass and nutrient content by the production of organic acids from bacteria [85], and in the same way in raspberry by the application of Bacillus [86], and in tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper by the application of Pseudomonas [87].

    Fatty acids are among the organic compounds produced by root exudates and these compounds are mainly used for energy storage [88]. Some of them are not produced by the human body and must be introduced into the diet by eating vegetables (potato, cabbages, wheal and chive) and fruits (lemon, strawberry and orange) [89]. The importance of consuming these compounds is based on their biological properties which has been shown to have positive effects against cardiovascular diseases, arthritis and triglyceride levels. Cucurbit, strawberry and tomato are a good source of bioactive compounds and have an excellent nutritional composition, containing fatty acids among other compounds with antioxidants effects [90]. Some plant oils commonly used for human consumption have unsaturated fatty acids like linolenic, linoleic and oleic acid and saturated ones such us palmitic and stearic [88,91]. Also, pumpkin seed oil has high nutritional value due to containing fatty acids like oleic, linolenid, palmitic and stearic. The application of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus lentus) and nitrogen fixing bacteria (Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.) in pumpkin plants has been lead to an increase in oil, seed and fruit yield, especially the fatty acid content [92].

    On the other hand, plants sterols are essential bioactive components of cell membranes which are present in high concentrations in vegetable oils [93]. Furthermore, the presence of these organic compounds in plants is related to protective effects against abiotic stresses [68]. These organic compounds are usually released in plant root exudates; the most abundant are campestrol, stigmasterol and sitoesterol and are found in the fruits and vegetables that make up the human diet [94]. The consumption of plants sterols may have some health benefits, like reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and protecting against different types of cancer [91]. It has been reported in the literature that the application of PGPR can produce an increment in the levels of sterols in plants. Silva et al. [95] inoculated two strains of Rhizobium (TVP08 and PEPT01) in pepper (Capsicum annuum L) and evaluated their effect on sterols. The inoculation of Rhizobium produced a positive effect on the ripening of the pepper fruit, in addition to an improvement in several primary and secondary metabolites, which improved the nutritional value of the plant.

    Other organic substances which are common components of plants are volatile compounds. These can be found in small amounts in plants and are related to flowers, fruits, leaves, roots and vegetative tissues [96]. These compounds can act as a plant defense response against pathogens and predators [66]. Plants have control mechanisms that regulate the substances and the moment of the volatiles compounds synthesis. Their production can be influenced by the interaction with environmental microorganisms [96]. The application of rhizobacteria that promote plant growth can trigger an increase in the amount of volatile compounds, improving their qualities for the biological control of diseases [67]. In this respect, it has been shown that Bacillus [67,97,98] and Pseudomonas strains [90] can produce the inhibition of plant pathogens by the increment of volatile organic compounds in plants.

    Essential oils are among the group of volatile compounds and are intensely aromatic compounds biosynthesized by plants [99]. It is known that soil microorganisms can modify the secondary metabolic routes of plants, influencing the synthesis of essential oils that are of great importance for the food and pharmaceutical industries [46]. The most volatile compounds contained in Origanum majorana L. are essential oils and have an important economic interest because of their use as flavoring, fragrances, fungicides and insecticides. Some authors have determined the effects of root colonization by PGPRs on the composition and amount of essential oils in different crops, and the inoculation of Origanum majorana with P. fluorescens and Bradyrhizobium sp. [65] and the inoculation of peppermint (Mentha piperita) with P. fluorescens [100] produces an increase in the total essential oil content without modifying its composition.

    Additionally, the production of antimicrobial compounds by plant probiotic bacteria should be highlighted. Many studies have reported that some PGPR strains are also able to produce these types of molecules, which have been shown to be effective against pest and pathogens and effective as biocontrol agents [101]. According to Zhen et al. [102], several Bacillus strains have an important effect on suppressing pathogens and promoting plant growth due to antagonistic relationships and the enhancement of the host's nutritional content and growth [103]. Antibiosis processes and an induction of systematic resistance (ISR) have also been reported to have effects on plant health [104]. The production of several organic acids, such as citric and ascorbic, which are strong antimicrobial agents, has been reported to be efficient at fighting against pathogens in vegetables and fruits due to a reduction in pH and anion accumulation [64]. Therefore, based on their mode of action and effects, many strains can also be used as biocontrol agents, which greatly enhance food quality and growth [102].


    4. Situation, Characteristics and Problems Concerning the Current Commercialization of Plant Probiotic Bacterial Products

    In addition to the many bacterial inoculants that have already been used to treat legume crops, the number of commercial products for other types of crops is increasing every year [1]. However the development and commercialization of new inoculants and formulas require governmental approval and must fulfill several requirements that are not always general and well established. Moreover, they depend on where the new product is registered [105].

    In spite of being a worldwide process, one that is increasing year by year, there are no specific standards established for the creation and development of green products that can be used to reduce the amount of chemical fertilizers used, according to the new politics initiatives and programs (e.g. HORIZON 2020) [1]. Thus, the laws vary among countries and to date there is no international agreement regarding the quality control of biofertilizers [105]. Many countries have developed governmental policies for the use of biofertilizers, however, specifications to regulate such new products have not yet been established [3]. In this context, collaborations between researchers and industries are a key factor for establishing the basis of a worldwide biofertilizer market [1].

    Suitable inoculants should be safe and nontoxic for environment and humans [106,107,108]. Herrmann et al. [109] shows that 64% of the commercial biofertilizers analyzed contained one or several contaminant strains, as well as human pathogens. Findings such as these highlight the need for better quality control of the inoculants that make up biofertilizers.

    Moreover, in spite of the successful results so far achieved in the numerous studies involving plant growth promotion under controlled laboratories and greenhouses conditions, there have been variations within the results obtained in field trails. These differences can be explained by the abiotic and biotic conditions that can influence bacteria in the soil, as quite often bacterial inoculants are unable to survive in some specific niches [110]. Thus, according to Quin et al. [16] microbial plant communities fluctuate and depend on the state of the surrounding ecosystem.

    Inoculant formulas should include the most effective plant growth promoting bacterial strains [111] and be designed to provide a high number of viable cells. Also, the presence of these strains should not become rapidly diminished [108]. The bacteria need to be able to survive in a broad spectrum of conditions, since crops are grown under a multiplicity of environmental and difficult conditions [107]. Thus, over the years, researchers have been working to develop new bacterial products active in a wide variety of weather conditions that can cause a difference in the benefits provided by the bacterial inoculants [112]. In this sense, according to Lesueur et al. [108], there are four types of products depending on the carrier material used: granules, liquids, slurries and powders. Herrmann and Lesueur [113] established the importance of a suitable carrier as a key factor to ensure bacterial protection against environmental conditions, microorganism survival and their establishment and action after the inoculation of crops.

    Nowadays, despite all of the requirements and specifications, a large variety of bacterial inoculants, based on plant probiotic bacteria that enhances the quality of fruit and horticultural crops, are commercialized worldwide. This part of the review focuses on presenting some of the best known companies or sold products (Table 2). Nevertheless, the effects on food quality by the majority of commercialized bacterial products on sale today are not detailed or analyzed yet.

    Table 2. Commercial quality enhancing products used on fruit and horticultural crops.
    Product Company Crop type Effect caused
    Pseudo-Guard Bio Fungicide ® BioFix Horticultural crops Enhanced food quality
    Ajay Azospirillum® Ajay Bio-tech Vegetables, cash and fruit crops Enhanced chlorophyll content and enhanced vitamin, auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin production
    Ajay Azo® Ajay Bio-tech Vegetable and horticulture crops Enhanced auxin production
    Ajay Meal® Ajay Bio-tech Fruit crops and vegetables Enhanced overall quality
    Inogro® Flozyme corporation Horticultural crops Enhanced plant nutritional content
    Azotobacter Culture® Guajart State Fertilizers & Chemicals LTD Banana, cash and horticultural crops Enhanced plant nutritional content
    Azospirillum Culture ® Guajart State Fertilizers & Chemicals LTD Banana, cash and horticultural crops Enhance nutritional plant content
    Prabha Zinc® Prabhat Fertilizer & Chemical Works Horticultural crops Enhanced zinc content
    Bonasol® Abiosa Tomato, pepper and chilli crops Enhanced plant nutritional content
    EM-1 Microbial inoculants® TeraGanix All types of vegetables and trees Improved product quality
    Bio-TilisTM Agrovergel Horticultural crops Enhanced crop quality
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Due to the beneficial effects of fruit and vegetable crops on human health, the company "Guajart State Fertilizers & Chemical LTD" commercializes Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture®, a mixture of bacterial strains, to enhance the nutrient plant content in cash and horticultural crops.

    Among the biofertilizers, useful for the production of horticultural crops such as tomatoes, Inogro® is produced and commercialized by the company "Flozyme Corporation" (USA). Inogro® is a mix of more than 30 bacterial species that not only enhance plant growth promotion and crop production, but also improves plant nutrient content.

    One of the best results found in the improvement of tomato and pepper yields is achieved using Bonasol®, sold and produced by the company "Abiosa". This product is based on a mixture of bacterial and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Bonasol® improves phosphorus and potassium availability to the plants and enhances the plants' final nutritional state.

    India is one of the countries whose government is making a large effort to try to increase the application of biofertilizers in their current farming system, and this has led to the development of companies such as Ajay Bio-tech (India) LDT. The company "Ajay Bio-tech (India) LTD" is one of the most important in India [105], and offers different quality enhancing products (Ajay Azo®, Ajay Azospirillum® and Ajay Meal®) used on many fruit and horticultural crops. These products are based on nitrogen-fixing or phosphate, and potassium-solubilising bacteria single or combined. Many of these strains enhance the uptake of indispensable nutrients by the plant, and overall plant nutrient content.

    Thus, it is very important that the use of biofertilizers and the changes in traditional farming systems are approved by farmers worldwide. This is a key step for encouraging the commercialization and production of green products and will help to secure the foundations of a solid biofertilizer market [105].


    5. Conclusions and Future Research Perspectives

    Unlike chemical fertilizers, the application of plant probiotic bacteria as green products in the field enhances the nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables. Therefore, the reduced use of chemical fertilizers in favor of products based on probiotic bacteria is a good alternative, not only to reduce the overuse of chemical fertilizer but also to ensure food quality. It has been reported on many occasions how the application of green products enhances crop production, reduces pathogen and pest attacks and increases plant nutrient content. However, to improve the use of biofertilizers many changes need to be made. This includes establishing more effective quality control systems that ensure commercial products are safely made and with nontoxic bacteria. As regards green products need to be designed using suitable carriers that allow these products to be successful in a broad spectrum of environmental conditions.

    In this review, we have described several cases of plant probiotic bacteria that when used as biofertilizers act to promoter plant growth, produce increases in yield and improve some parameters associated with food quality. According to some recent studies, bacterial plant probiotics are able to establish a relationship with fruit and horticultural crops and as a result of this interaction some plant compounds, which are beneficial to human health, have an increased production. On one hand, as outlined above, the market for bacterial fertilizers is continuously growing, but the effects of these commercialized bacteria on food quality parameters are not detailed. Therefore, more studies on the effect of improved food quality caused by different types of bacteria are necessary. This would allow for the better selection of plant probiotic bacteria with potential applications in agricultural practices orientated toward the production of high quality fruits and vegetables.

    On the other hand, it has been reported how the application of plant probiotic bacteria improve the quality of fruit and vegetables by increasing vitamins, flavonoids and antioxidants content, among other benefits. However, there are other functional food compounds that can also be potentially improved by bacterial inoculants. In the future, new research approaches such as metabolomic studies, comparing fruits and vegetables grown with and without the application of plant probiotic bacteria, may reveal additional beneficial effects on the quality of food crops from the applications of these types of bacteria.


    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful for the funding received by the Regional Government of Castile and Leon and the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (JCyL SA169U14 and MINECO; AGL2015-70510-R). AJG was funded by the FPU predoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Government. The authors also thank Emma Keck for the English language editing.


    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


    [1] García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Rivas R (2015) Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng 2: 183–205. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183
    [2] Trienekens J, Zurbier P (2008) Quality and safety standards in the food industry, developments and challenges. Int J Prod Econ 113: 107–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.050
    [3] García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Celador-Lera L, et al. (2017) Bacterial Probiotics: A truly Green Revolution, In: Probiotics and Plant Health, Springer.
    [4] Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Uni-Sci 26: 1–20.
    [5] Flores-Félix JD, Silva LR, Rivera LP, et al. (2015) Plants probiotics as a tool to produce highly functional fruits: the case of Phyllobacterium and vitamin C in strawberries. PLoS One 10: e0122281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122281
    [6] Spence C, Alff E, Shantharaj D, et al. (2012) Probiotics for Plants: Importance of Rhizobacteria on Aboveground Fitness in Plants, In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1–14.
    [7] Islam MT, Hossain MM (2012) Plant probiotics in phosphorus nutrition in crops, with special reference to rice, In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 325–363.
    [8] Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE (2005) Bacteria/plant growth-promotion, In: Hillel D, Editor, Encyclopaedia of Soils in the Environment, Oxford: Elsevier, 103–115.
    [9] Jiménez-Gómez A, Menéndez E, Flores-Félix JD, et al. (2016) Effective Colonization of Spinach Root Surface by Rhizobium, In: Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interaction, Springer International Publishing, 109–122.
    [10] Güneş A, Turan M, Güllüce M, et al. (2014) Nutritional content analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria species. Eur J Soil Biol 60: 88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.10.010
    [11] Moreno D, Carvajal M, López-Berenguer C (2006) Chemical and biological characterisation of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli. J Pharmaceut Biomed 41: 1508–1522.
    [12] Yildirim E, Turan M, Ekinci M, et al. (2015) Growth and mineral content of cabbage seedlings in response to nitrogen fixing rhizobacteria treatment. Rom Biotech Lett 20: 10929–10935.
    [13] García-Seco D, Zhang Y, Gutierrez-Mañero FJ, et al. (2015) Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens to blackberry under field conditions improves fruit quality by modifying flavonoid metabolism. PloS One 10: e0142639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142639
    [14] Ochoa-Velasco CE, Valadez-Blanco R, Salas-Coronado R, et al. (2016) Effect of nitrogen fertilization and Bacillus licheniformis biofertilizer addition on the antioxidants compounds and antioxidant activity of greenhouse cultivated tomato fruits (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Sheva). Sci Hor 201: 338–345.
    [15] Yang CH, Crowley DE (2000) Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status. App Environ Microb 66: 345–351.
    [16] Qin Y, Fu Y, Dong C, et al. (2016) Shifts of microbial communities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation in a closed artificial ecosystem. App Microbial Biot 100: 4085–4095.
    [17] Trivedi P, Pandey A, Palni LMS (2012) Bacterial inoculants for field applications under mountain ecosystem: present initiatives and future prospects, In: Bacteria in agrobiology: Plant probiotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 15–44.
    [18] Young CC, Shen FT, Singh S (2012) Strategies for the Exploration and Development of Biofertilizer, In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 127–139.
    [19] García-Fraile P, Carro L, Robledo M, et al. (2012) Rhizobium promotes non-legumes growth and quality in several production steps: towards a biofertilization of edible raw vegetables healthy for humans. PLoS One 7: e38122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038122
    [20] Nile SH, Park SW (2014) Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 30: 134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.04.007
    [21] Sun‐Waterhouse D (2011) The development of fruit‐based functional foods targeting the health and wellness market: a review. Int J Food Sci Tech 46: 899–920. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02499.x
    [22] Seeram NP (2006) Berries, In: Heber D, Nutritional Oncology, 2 Eds., London: Academic Press, 615–625.
    [23] Drewnowski A (2005) Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. Am J Clin Nutr 82: 721–732.
    [24] Ramsay SA, Shriver LH, Taylor CA (2017) Variety of fruit and vegetables is related to preschoolers' overall diet quality. Prev Med 5: 112–117.
    [25] Combs JGF, McClung JP (2016) The vitamins: fundamental aspects in nutrition and health, Academic press.
    [26] Simkin SK, Tuck K, Garrett J, et al. (2016) Vitamin A deficiency: an unexpected cause of visual loss. Lancet 387: 93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01233-7
    [27] Sechi G, Sechi E, Fois C, et al. (2016) Advances in clinical determinants and neurological manifestations of B vitamin deficiency in adults. Nutr Rev 74: 107.
    [28] Garcia-Casal MN, Peña-Rosas JP, Giyose B (2016) Staple crops biofortified with increased vitamins and minerals: considerations for a public health strategy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1390: 3–13.
    [29] Linster CL, Van Schaftingen E (2007) Vitamin C. Febs J 274: 1–22.
    [30] Pırlak L, Köse M (2009) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yield and some fruit properties of strawberry. J Plant Nutr 32: 1173–1184. doi: 10.1080/01904160902943197
    [31] Erturk Y, Ercisli S, Cakmakci R (2012) Yield and growth response of strawberry to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation. J Plant Nutr 35: 817–826. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2012.663437
    [32] Bona E, Cantamessa S, Massa N, et al. (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads improve yield, quality and nutritional value of tomato: a field study. Mycorrhiza 27: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0727-y
    [33] Shen F, Zhu TB, Teng MJ, et al. (2016) Effects of interaction between vermicompost and probiotics on soil nronerty, yield and quality of tomato. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 27.
    [34] Gül A, Kidoglu F, Tüzel Y (2008) Effects of nutrition and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growing in perlite. Span J Agric Res 6: 422–429. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2008063-335
    [35] Zeljic K, Supic G, Magic Z (2017) New insights into vitamin D anticancer properties: focus on miRNA modulation. Mol Genet Genomics: 1–14.
    [36] Bona E, Lingua G, Manassero P, et al. (2015) AM fungi and PGP pseudomonads increase flowering, fruit production, and vitamin content in strawberry grown at low nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Mycorrhiza 25: 181–193. doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0599-y
    [37] Dave RI, Shah NP (1997) Effectiveness of ascorbic acid as an oxygen scavenger in improving viability of probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made with commercial starter cultures. Int Dairy J 7: 435–443. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(97)00026-5
    [38] Kris-Etherton PM, Hecker KD, Bonanome A, et al. (2002). Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am J Med 113: 71–88.
    [39] Grajek W, Olejnik A, Sip A (2005) Probiotics, prebiotics and antioxidants as functional foods. Acta Biochim Pol 52: 665.
    [40] Dorais M, Ehret DL, Papadopoulos AP (2008) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem Rev 7: 231–250. doi: 10.1007/s11101-007-9085-x
    [41] Martínez-Valverde I, Periago MJ, Provan G, et al. (2002) Phenolic compounds, lycopene and antioxidant activity in commercial varieties of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). J Sci Food Agr 82: 323–330. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1035
    [42] Ordookhani K (2011) Investigation of PGPR on antioxidant activity of essential oil and microelement contents of sweet basil. Adv Environ Biol 5: 1114–1120.
    [43] Heidari M, Golpayegani A (2012) Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agr Sci 11: 57–61.
    [44] Silva LR, Azevedo J, Pereira MJ, et al. (2014) Inoculation of the nonlegume Capsicum annuum (L.) with Rhizobium strains. 1. Effect on bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and fruit ripeness. J Agr Food Chem 62: 557–564.
    [45] Aaby K, Wrolstad RE, Ekeberg D, et al. (2007) Polyphenol composition and antioxidant activity in strawberry purees; impact of achene level and storage. J Agr Food Chem 55: 5156–5166. doi: 10.1021/jf070467u
    [46] Lingua G, Bona E, Manassero P, et al. (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads increases anthocyanin concentration in strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa var. Selva) in conditions of reduced fertilization. Int J Mol Sci 14: 16207–16225.
    [47] Shumskaya M, Wurtzel ET (2013) The carotenoid biosynthetic pathway: Thinking in all dimensions. Plant Sci 208: 58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.012
    [48] Park YJ, Park SY, Valan AM, et al. (2017) Accumulation of Carotenoids and Metabolic Profiling in Different Cultivars of Tagetes Flowers. Molecules 22: 313. doi: 10.3390/molecules22020313
    [49] Stahl W, Sies H (1996) Lycopene: a biologically important carotenoid for humans? Arch Biochem Biophys 336: 1–9. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0525
    [50] Giovannucci E (1999) Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer I 91: 317–331. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.4.317
    [51] Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, et al. (2003) Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J Agr Food Chem 83: 369–382. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1370
    [52] Ordookhani K, Khavazi K, Moezzi A, et al. (2010) Influence of PGPR and AMF on antioxidant activity, lycopene and potassium contents in tomato. Afr J Agri Res 5: 1108–1116.
    [53] Zahid M, Abbasi MK, Hameed S, et al. (2015) Isolation and identification of indigenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from Himalayan region of Kashmir and their effect on improving growth and nutrient contents of maize (Zea mays L.). Front Microbiol 6: 1–10.
    [54] Agbodjato N, Noumavo P, Adjanohoun A (2016) Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Chitosan on in vitro seeds germination, greenhouse growth, and nutrient uptake of Maize (Zea mays L.). Biotechnol Res Int.
    [55] Arora NK, Tewari S, Singh S, et al. (2012) PGPR for Protection of Plant Health Under Saline Conditions, In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 239–258.
    [56] Bhardwaj D, Ansari M, Sahoo R, et al. (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13: 66. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-66
    [57] Kuan K, Othman R, Rahim K, et al. (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse. PloS One 11: e0152478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152478
    [58] Yildirim E, Karlidag H, Turan M, et al. (2011) Growth, nutrient uptake, and yield promotion of broccoli by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with manure. HortScience 46: 932–936.
    [59] Çakmakçı R, Kantar F, Sahin F (2001) Effect of N2-fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 164: 527. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200110)164:5<527::AID-JPLN527>3.0.CO;2-1
    [60] Manai J, Kalai T, Gouia H, et al. (2014) Exogenous nitric oxide (NO) ameliorates salinity-induced oxidative stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14: 433–446.
    [61] Sharafzadeh S (2012) Effects of PGPR on growth and nutrients uptake of tomato. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2: 27.
    [62] Vayssières JF, Goergen G, Lokossou O, et al. (2009) A new bactrocera species in benin among mango fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species. Acta Hortic 820: 581–588.
    [63] Sampietro DA (2001) Alelopatía: Concepto, características, metodología de estudio e importancia. Fac. de Bioquím., Quím. y Farm. Un. Nac. de Tucumán, Arg. Available from: http://www. mdp. edu. ar/illia/nueva/Alelopatia/Alelopatía.
    [64] Rico D, Martín-Diana AB, Barat JM, et al. (2007) Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech 18: 373–386. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.011
    [65] Banchio E, Bogino PC, Zygadlo J, et al. (2008) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and essential oil yield in Origanum majorana L. Biochem Syst Ecol 36: 766–771. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2008.08.006
    [66] Gil M, Bottini R, Berli F, et al. (2013) Volatile organic compounds characterized from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Malbec) berries increase at pre-harvest and in response to UV-B radiation. Phytochemistry 96: 148–157.
    [67] Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, el al. (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Tech 7: 96–102.
    [68] Ávalos A, Pérez E (2009) Metabolismo secundario de plantas. Serie Fisiología Vegetal 2: 119–145.
    [69] Flores P, Hellín P, Fenoll J (2012) Determination of organic acids in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometry. Food Chem 132: 1049–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.064
    [70] López-Raéz JA, Pozo MJ (2013) Chemical Signalling in the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis: Biotechnological Applications, In: Symbiotic Endophytes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 215–232.
    [71] Pourcel L, Routaboul JM, Cheynier V, et al. (2007) Flavonoid oxidation in plants: from biochemical properties to physiological functions. Trends Plant Sci 12: 29–36.
    [72] George VC, Dellaire G, Rupasinghe HV (2017) Plant flavonoids in cancer chemoprevention: role in genome stability. J Nutr Biochem 45: 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.11.007
    [73] Martín MÁ, Fernández‐Millán E, Ramos S, et al. (2014) Cocoa flavonoid epicatechin protects pancreatic beta cell viability and function against oxidative stress. Mol Nutr Food Res 58: 447–456. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300291
    [74] Kim B, Choi YE, Kim HS (2014) Eruca sativa and its Flavonoid Components, Quercetin and Isorhamnetin, Improve Skin Barrier Function by Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator‐Activated Receptor (PPAR)‐α and Suppression of Inflammatory Cytokines. Phytother Res 28: 1359–1366. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5138
    [75] Orhan DD, Özçelik B, Özgen S, et al. (2010) Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activities of some flavonoids. Microbiol Res 165: 496–504.
    [76] Basu P, Maier C (2016) In vitro antioxidant activities and polyphenol contents of seven commercially available fruits. Pharmacogn Res 8: 258. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.188875
    [77] Kaume L, Howard LR, Devareddy L (2011) The blackberry fruit: a review on its composition and chemistry, metabolism and bioavailability, and health benefits. J Agr Food chem 60: 5716–5727.
    [78] García-Seco D, Bonilla A, Algar E, et al. (2013) Enhanced blackberry production using Pseudomonas fluorescens as elicitor. Agron Sustain Dev 33: 385–392.
    [79] Ramos-Solano B, Garcia-Villaraco A, Gutierrez-Mañero FJ, et al. (2014) Annual changes in bioactive contents and production in field-grown blackberry after inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Plant Physiol Bioch 74: 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.029
    [80] Ghorbanpour M, Hatami M, Kariman K, et al. (2016) Phytochemical variations and enhanced efficiency of antioxidant and antimicrobial ingredients in Salvia officinalis as inoculated with different rhizobacteria. Chem Biodivers 13: 319–330. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201500082
    [81] Ramos-Solano B, Algar E, Gutierrez-Mañero FJ, et al. (2015) Bacterial bioeffectors delay postharvest fungal growth and modify total phenolics, flavonoids and anthocyanins in blackberries. LWT-Food Sci Technol 61: 437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.11.051
    [82] Singh R, Babu S, Avasthe RK, et al. (2015) Bacterial inoculation effect on soil biological properties, growth, grain yield, total phenolic and flavonoids contents of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) under hilly ecosystems of North-East India. Afr J Microbiol Res 9: 1110–1117. doi: 10.5897/AJMR2014.7357
    [83] Huang G, Guo G, Yao E, et al. (2015) Organic acids, amino acids compositions in the root exudades and Cu-accumulation in castor (Ricinus communis L.) under Cu stress. Int J Phytoremediat 18: 33–40.
    [84] Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizosphere-a critical review. Plant Soil 205: 25–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1004356007312
    [85] Esitken A, Yildiz HE, Ercisli S, et al. (2010) Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Sci Horti 124: 62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.12.012
    [86] Orhan E, Esitken A, Ercisli S, et al. (2006) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrient contents in organically growing raspberry. Sci Horti 111: 38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.09.002
    [87] Kamilova F, Kravchenko LV, Shaposhnikov AI, et al. (2006) Organic acids, sugars, and L-Tryptophane in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe In 19: 250–256. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0250
    [88] Singh SP, Zhou X, Liu Q, et al. (2005) Metabolic engineering of new fatty acids in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.012
    [89] Hannemann K, Puchta V, Simon E, et al. (1989) The common occurrence of Furan Fatty Acids in Plants. Lipids 24: 296–298. doi: 10.1007/BF02535166
    [90] Fischer S, Príncipe A, Alvarez F, et al. (2013) Fighting plant diseases through the application of Bacillus and Pseudomonas strains, In: Symbiotic Endophytes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 265–193.
    [91] Badri DV, Vivanco JM (2009) Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ 32: 666–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x
    [92] Habibi A, Heidari1 G, Sohrabi1 Y, et al. (2011) Influence of bio, organic and chemical fertilizers on medicinal pumpkin traits. J Med Plants Res 5: 5590–5597.
    [93] Granado J, Felix G, Boller T (1995) Perception of fungal sterols in plants (subnanomolar concentrations of ergosterol elicit extracelular alkalinization in tomato cells). Plant Physiol 107: 485490.
    [94] Shukla KP, Sharma S, Singh NK, et al. (2011) Nature and role of root exudates: Efficacy in bioremediation. Afr J Biotech 10: 9717–9724.
    [95] Silva LR, Azevedo J, Pereira MJ, et al. (2014) Inoculation of the Nonlegume Capsicum annuum L. with Rhizobium Strains 2. Changes in Sterols, Triterpenes, Fatty Acids, and Volatile Compounds. J Agr Food Chem 6: 565–573.
    [96] Marín JC, Céspedes CL (2007) Volatile compounds from plants. origin, emission, effects, analysis and agro applications. Fitotec 30: 327–351.
    [97] Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, et al. (2003) Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 4927–4932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730845100
    [98] Piccoli P, Bottini R (2013) Abiotic Stress Tolerance Induced by Endophytic PGPR, In: Aroca R, Symbiotic Endophytes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 151–163.
    [99] Sangwan NS, Farooqi AHA, Shabih F, et al. (2001) Regulation of essential oil production in plants. Plant Growth Regul 34: 3–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1013386921596
    [100] Santoro MV, Zygadlo J, Giordano W, et al. (2011) Volatile organic compounds from rhizobacteria increase biosynthesis of essential oils and growth parameters in peppermint (Mentha piperita). Plant Physiol Biochem 49: 1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.07.016
    [101] Maheshwari DK (2011) Plant growth and health promoting bacteria, In: Microbiology monographs, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [102] Zheng Y, Chen F, Wang M (2013) Use of Bacillus-Based Biocontrol Agents for promoting plant growth and health, In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 243–258.
    [103] Choudhary DK, Johri BN (2009) Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants-with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164: 493–513.
    [104] Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94: 1259–1266. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259
    [105] Celador-Lera L, Jiménez-Gómez A, Menéndez E, et al. (2017) Biofertilizers based on bacterial endophytes isolated from cereals: potential solution to enhance these crops, In: Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agricultura, in press.
    [106] Nakkeeran S, Fernando WD, Siddiqui ZA (2005) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria formulations and its scope in commercialization for the management of pests and diseases, In: PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization, Springer Netherlands, 257–296.
    [107] Chauhan H, Bagyaraj DJ, Selvakumar G, et al. (2015) Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria-Prospects and potential. Appl Soil Ecol 95: 38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.011
    [108] Lesueur D, Deaker R, Herrmann L, et al. (2016) The production and potential of biofertilizers to improve crop yields, In: Bioformulations: for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer India, 71–92.
    [109] Herrmann L, Atieno M, Brau L, et al. (2015) Microbial quality of commercial inoculants to increase BNF and nutrient use efficiency. Biol Nitr Fix: 1031–1040.
    [110] Bishnoi U (2015) Chapter Four-PGPR Interaction: An Ecofriendly Approach Promoting the Sustainable Agriculture System, In: Advances in Botanical Research, Elsevier, 81–113.
    [111] Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica.
    [112] Kamilova F, Okon Y, de Weert S, et al. (2015) Commercialization of microbes: manufacturing, inoculation, best practice for objective field testing, and registration, In: Principles of plant-microbe interactions, Springer International Publishing, 319–327.
    [113] Herrmann L, Lesueur D (2013) Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation. Appl Microbiol Biot 97: 8859–8873.
    [114] Dursun A, Ekinci M, Donmez, MF (2010) Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pak J Bot 42: 3349–3356.
    [115] Karlidag H, Yildirim E, Turan M, et al. (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mitigate deleterious effects of salt stress on strawberry plants (Fragaria× ananassa). HortSci 48: 563–567.
    [116] Turan M, Ekinci M, Yildirim E (2014) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improved growth, nutrient, and hormone content of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) seedlings. Turk J Agr Forest 38: 327–333. doi: 10.3906/tar-1308-62
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yogita Ranade, Indu Sawant, Sujoy Saha, Madhura Chandrashekar, Pranav Pathak, Epiphytic Microbial Diversity of Vitis vinifera Fructosphere: Present Status and Potential Applications, 2021, 0343-8651, 10.1007/s00284-021-02385-0
    2. Wei Ji, Kai Han, Yinghui Cai, Yuanyuan Mu, Liang Zhao, Min Zhang, Chao Hou, Meiying Gao, Qifeng Zhao, Characterization of rhizosphere bacterial community and berry quality of Hutai No.8 (Vitis viniferaL.) with different ages, and their relations, 2019, 99, 0022-5142, 4532, 10.1002/jsfa.9690
    3. Prem Chandra, Ranjan Singh, 2020, Chapter 6, 978-981-15-3203-0, 105, 10.1007/978-981-15-3204-7_6
    4. Ahmet Akköprü, Şahika Akat, Hatice Özaktan, Ayşe Gül, Mustafa Akbaba, The long-term colonization dynamics of endophytic bacteria in cucumber plants, and their effects on yield, fruit quality and Angular Leaf Spot Disease, 2021, 282, 03044238, 110005, 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110005
    5. Possible Roles of Rhizospheric and Endophytic Microbes to Provide a Safe and Affordable Means of Crop Biofortification, 2019, 9, 2073-4395, 764, 10.3390/agronomy9110764
    6. Alejandro Jiménez-Gómez, Paula García-Fraile, José David Flores-Félix, Raúl Rivas, 2018, Chapter 8-1, 978-3-319-26478-3, 1, 10.1007/978-3-319-54528-8_8-1
    7. José David Flores-Félix, Encarna Velázquez, Paula García-Fraile, Fernando González-Andrés, Luís R. Silva, Raúl Rivas, Rhizobium and Phyllobacterium bacterial inoculants increase bioactive compounds and quality of strawberries cultivated in field conditions, 2018, 111, 09639969, 416, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.059
    8. Hary Razafindralambo, Aurélie Razafindralambo, Christophe Blecker, Thermophysical Fingerprinting of Probiotic-Based Products, 2019, 9, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-019-46469-1
    9. Esther Menéndez, Ana Paço, Is the Application of Plant Probiotic Bacterial Consortia Always Beneficial for Plants? Exploring Synergies between Rhizobial and Non-Rhizobial Bacteria and Their Effects on Agro-Economically Valuable Crops, 2020, 10, 2075-1729, 24, 10.3390/life10030024
    10. Alejandro Jiménez-Gómez, Paula García-Fraile, José David Flores-Félix, Raúl Rivas, 2019, Chapter 8, 978-3-319-78029-0, 1849, 10.1007/978-3-319-78030-6_8
    11. Alejandro Jiménez‐Gómez, Ignacio García‐Estévez, Paula García‐Fraile, M Teresa Escribano‐Bailón, Raúl Rivas, Increase in phenolic compounds of Coriandrum sativum L. after the application of a Bacillus halotolerans biofertilizer , 2020, 100, 0022-5142, 2742, 10.1002/jsfa.10306
    12. Gabriel Llauradó Maury, Daniel Méndez Rodríguez, Sophie Hendrix, Julio César Escalona Arranz, Yilan Fung Boix, Ania Ochoa Pacheco, Jesús García Díaz, Humberto J. Morris-Quevedo, Albys Ferrer Dubois, Elizabeth Isaac Aleman, Natalie Beenaerts, Isidro E. Méndez-Santos, Teresa Orberá Ratón, Paul Cos, Ann Cuypers, Antioxidants in Plants: A Valorization Potential Emphasizing the Need for the Conservation of Plant Biodiversity in Cuba, 2020, 9, 2076-3921, 1048, 10.3390/antiox9111048
    13. Gilbert Koskey, Simon Wambui Mburu, Richard Awino, Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru, John M. Maingi, Potential Use of Beneficial Microorganisms for Soil Amelioration, Phytopathogen Biocontrol, and Sustainable Crop Production in Smallholder Agroecosystems, 2021, 5, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2021.606308
    14. Natalya Harutyunyan, Almagul Kushugulova, Narine Hovhannisyan, Astghik Pepoyan, One Health Probiotics as Biocontrol Agents: One Health Tomato Probiotics, 2022, 11, 2223-7747, 1334, 10.3390/plants11101334
    15. Jorge Freitas, Pedro Silva, Sustainable Agricultural Systems for Fruit Orchards: The Influence of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on the Soil Biodiversity and Nutrient Management, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 13952, 10.3390/su142113952
    16. Shalini Rai, Manoj Kumar Solanki, Anjali Chandrol Solanki, Swarnmala Samal, 2023, 9780323906203, 269, 10.1016/B978-0-323-90620-3.00011-8
    17. Virgilija Gavelienė, Božena Šocik, Elžbieta Jankovska-Bortkevič, Sigita Jurkonienė, Plant Microbial Biostimulants as a Promising Tool to Enhance the Productivity and Quality of Carrot Root Crops, 2021, 9, 2076-2607, 1850, 10.3390/microorganisms9091850
    18. Sook-Kuan Lee, Huu-Sheng Lur, Chi-Te Liu, From Lab to Farm: Elucidating the Beneficial Roles of Photosynthetic Bacteria in Sustainable Agriculture, 2021, 9, 2076-2607, 2453, 10.3390/microorganisms9122453
    19. Virgilija Gavelienė, Sigita Jurkonienė, Probiotics Enhance Cereal Yield and Quality and Modify Agrochemical Soil Properties, 2022, 10, 2076-2607, 1277, 10.3390/microorganisms10071277
    20. Hayriye Yildiz Dasgan, Abdullah Aldiyab, Farah Elgudayem, Boran Ikiz, Nazim S. Gruda, Effect of biofertilizers on leaf yield, nitrate amount, mineral content and antioxidants of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in a floating culture, 2022, 12, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-022-24799-x
    21. Daniela Sangiorgio, Antonio Cellini, Francesco Spinelli, Brian Farneti, Iuliia Khomenko, Enrico Muzzi, Stefano Savioli, Chiara Pastore, María Teresa Rodriguez-Estrada, Irene Donati, Does Organic Farming Increase Raspberry Quality, Aroma and Beneficial Bacterial Biodiversity?, 2021, 9, 2076-2607, 1617, 10.3390/microorganisms9081617
    22. O.V. Ryabova, A.A. Gagarina, Actinomycetes as the basis of Probiotics for Plants, 2021, 37, 2500-2341, 3, 10.21519/0234-2758-2021-37-2-3-19
    23. Juan Sanjuán, Maria Caridad Nápoles, Daniel Pérez-Mendoza, María J. Lorite, Dulce N. Rodríguez-Navarro, Microbials for Agriculture: Why Do They Call Them Biostimulants When They Mean Probiotics?, 2023, 11, 2076-2607, 153, 10.3390/microorganisms11010153
    24. Barbara Łata, Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans, Dariusz Wrona, Apple Antioxidant Properties as an Effect of N Dose and Rate—Mycorrhization Involvement: A Long-Term Study, 2022, 11, 2076-3921, 2446, 10.3390/antiox11122446
    25. Romain Darriaut, Vincent Lailheugue, Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarède, Elisa Marguerit, Guilherme Martins, Stéphane Compant, Patricia Ballestra, Steven Upton, Nathalie Ollat, Virginie Lauvergeat, Grapevine rootstock and soil microbiome interactions: Keys for a resilient viticulture, 2022, 9, 2052-7276, 10.1093/hr/uhac019
    26. Rima Mockevičiūtė, Sigita Jurkonienė, Virgilija Gavelienė, Elžbieta Jankovska-Bortkevič, Božena Šocik, Gabija Armalytė, Rimas Budrys, Effects Induced by the Agricultural Application of Probiotics on Antioxidant Potential of Strawberries, 2022, 11, 2223-7747, 831, 10.3390/plants11060831
    27. Reyed M Reyed, 2021, Chapter 23, 978-981-16-0601-4, 565, 10.1007/978-981-16-0602-1_23
    28. Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji, Osikemekha Anthony Anani, Olugbemi T. Olaniyan, Abel Inobeme, Frances N. Olisaka, Eseosa Oluwadamilare Uwadiae, Omoregbe Nosa Obayagbona, 2021, Chapter 20, 978-981-16-2921-1, 507, 10.1007/978-981-16-2922-8_20
    29. Satish Kumar Singh, Mainak Barman, Anirban Sil, Jai Prakash Prasad, Sayanta Kundu, Rajeev Nayan Bahuguna, Nutrient biofortification in wheat: opportunities and challenges, 2022, 0133-3720, 10.1007/s42976-022-00288-9
    30. Beshir M. Ali, Frederic Ang, H. J. van der Fels-Klerx, Nikolaos Georgantzis, Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs, 2021, 16, 1932-6203, e0260488, 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488
    31. Dorotėja Vaitiekūnaitė, Greta Striganavičiūtė, Valeriia Mishcherikova, Vaida Sirgedaitė-Šėžienė, Populus tremula × P. alba Microshoot Secondary Metabolism Response after Paenibacillus sp. Inoculation In Vitro, 2022, 13, 1999-4907, 1702, 10.3390/f13101702
    32. Dorotėja Vaitiekūnaitė, Ingrida Bružaitė, Valentinas Snitka, Endophytes from blueberry (Vaccinium sp.) fruit: Characterization of yeast and bacteria via label-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), 2022, 275, 13861425, 121158, 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121158
    33. Sigita Jurkonienė, Rima Mockevičiu̅tė, Jurga Jankauskienė, Elžbieta Jankovska-Bortkevič, Gabija Armalytė, Virgilija Gavelienė, Application of Commercial Plant Probiotics Improves the Berry Yield and Quality of Field-Grown Blackcurrant, 2021, 1, 2692-1952, 615, 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00115
    34. V.G. Sowmeya, Mythili Sathiavelu, 2024, 9780443159244, 219, 10.1016/B978-0-443-15924-4.00003-5
    35. Xiaomin Pang, Meihui Chen, Pengyao Miao, Weiting Cheng, Zewei Zhou, Ying Zhang, Qi Zhang, Jianghua Ye, Xiaoli Jia, Haibin Wang, Effects of Different Planting Years on Soil Physicochemical Indexes, Microbial Functional Diversity and Fruit Quality of Pear Trees, 2024, 14, 2077-0472, 226, 10.3390/agriculture14020226
    36. Ahmed Hamdy Abdel-Moghies, Motaz Hassan El-Sehrawy, Abeer Emam Zakaria, Shimaa Mohamed Fahmy, In vivo application of potent probiotics for enhancing potato growth and controlling Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum infections, 2024, 117, 0003-6072, 10.1007/s10482-024-01928-2
    37. Corinne Walsh, Caihong Vanderburgh, Lady Grant, Ella Katz, Daniel J. Kliebenstein, Noah Fierer, Microbial terroir: associations between soil microbiomes and the flavor chemistry of mustard (Brassica juncea), 2024, 0028-646X, 10.1111/nph.19708
    38. Owen G Osborne, Randall R Jiménez, Allison Q Byrne, Brian Gratwicke, Amy Ellison, Carly R Muletz-Wolz, Phylosymbiosis shapes skin bacterial communities and pathogen-protective function in Appalachian salamanders, 2024, 18, 1751-7362, 10.1093/ismejo/wrae104
    39. Liudmyla Tytova, Valentyna Sergiienko, Yevhen Pylypiuk, Galyna Iutynska, Effectiveness of the Complex Microbial Formulation for Disease Protection and Productivity Enhancement of Plants, 2023, 69, 1338-4376, 161, 10.2478/agri-2023-0014
    40. Michał Pylak, Karolina Oszust, Jacek Panek, Dominika Siegieda, Justyna Cybulska, Artur Zdunek, Agnieszka Orzeł, Magdalena Frąc, Impact of microbial-based biopreparations on soil quality, plant health, and fruit chemistry in raspberry cultivation, 2024, 03088146, 140943, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140943
    41. Margaritis Tsifintaris, Despoina Eugenia Kiousi, Panagiotis Repanas, Christina S. Kamarinou, Ioannis Kavakiotis, Alex Galanis, Probio-Ichnos: A Database of Microorganisms with In Vitro Probiotic Properties, 2024, 12, 2076-2607, 1955, 10.3390/microorganisms12101955
    42. Tahani Tabassum, Sagarika Shahriar, Yusha Araf, Md. Asad Ullah, Tofazzal Islam, 2024, Chapter 12, 978-981-97-3472-6, 333, 10.1007/978-981-97-3473-3_12
    43. Sana Mounaimi, Ahlam Hamim, Mohammed El Mehdi El Boukhari, Hicham Elarroussi, Karim Lyamlouli, A comprehensive review of integrating biostimulants and biopesticides for organic berry farming: exploring challenges and opportunities for Africa, 2024, 8, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1452823
    44. Alaa Kareem Niamah, Shayma Thyab Gddoa Al-Sahlany, Hussein Katai Abdul-Sada, Pawan Prabhakar, Soubhagya Tripathy, Basant Kumar Dadrwal, Smita Singh, Deepak Kumar Verma, Alok Kumar Gupta, Rakesh Mohan Shukla, Mamta Thakur, Ami R. Patel, Gemilang Lara Utama, Mónica L. Chávez González, Prem Prakash Srivastav, Wissal Audah Hassan Alhilfi, José Sandoval-Cortés, Cristobal Noe Aguilar, Phytophagous probiotic foods: Exploring the intersection of characteristics, quality implications, health benefits, and market dynamics, 2024, 154, 09242244, 104795, 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104795
    45. Halil Demir, Andaç Kutay Saka, Ufuk Uçan, İsmail Hakkı Akgün, H. Kayhan Yalçı, Impact of effective micro-organisms (EM) on the yield, growth and bio-chemical properties of lettuce when applied to soil and leaves, 2024, 24, 1471-2229, 10.1186/s12870-024-05980-y
    46. Víctor Manuel Maranto-Gómez, Clara Ivette Rincón-Molina, Luis Alberto Manzano-Gómez, Adriana Gen-Jiménez, Julio César Maldonado-Gómez, Juan José Villalobos-Maldonado, Víctor Manuel Ruiz-Valdiviezo, Reiner Rincón-Rosales, Francisco Alexander Rincón-Molina, Plant Probiotic Potential of Native Rhizobia to Enhance Growth and Sugar Content in Agave tequilana Weber var. Blue, 2025, 11, 2311-7524, 137, 10.3390/horticulturae11020137
    47. Isaac Guajardo-Paz, Valentín Robledo-Torres, Rosalinda Mendoza-Villarreal, Armando Hernández-Pérez, Manuel Sandoval-Villa, Marcelino Cabrera-De la Fuente, Evaluación de la aplicación de rizobacterias y fertilización química en la producción y calidad del fruto de Physalis peruviana, 2023, 2521-9758, 10.33064/iycuaa2023904281
    48. Virgilija Gavelienė, Rima Mockevičiūtė, Elžbieta Jankovska-Bortkevič, Vaidevutis Šveikauskas, Mariam Zareyan, Tautvydas Žalnierius, Jurga Jankauskienė, Sigita Jurkonienė, Synergistic Effects of Microbial Biostimulants and Calcium in Alleviating Drought Stress in Oilseed Rape, 2025, 13, 2076-2607, 530, 10.3390/microorganisms13030530
    49. Adriana Gen-Jiménez, José David Flores-Félix, Clara Ivette Rincón-Molina, Luis Alberto Manzano-Gómez, Juan José Villalobos-Maldonado, Nancy Ruiz-Lau, Rocio Roca-Couso, Víctor Manuel Ruíz-Valdiviezo, Reiner Rincón-Rosales, Native Rhizobium biofertilization enhances yield and quality in Solanum lycopersicum under field conditions, 2025, 41, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-025-04349-z
    50. Slimane Mokrani, El-Hafid Nabti, 2025, Chapter 15, 978-981-96-0168-4, 423, 10.1007/978-981-96-0169-1_15
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10234) PDF downloads(2303) Cited by(50)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog