Incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is rising sharply in the United States. Between 2014 and 2019, incidence among men and women has increased by 62.8% and 21.4%, respectively, with an estimated 68 million Americans contracting an STI in 2018.a Some human behaviors impacting the expanding STI epidemic are unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.b Increasing dating app usage has been postulated as a driver for increases in the numbers of people engaging in these behaviors. Using the proposed model, it is estimated that both STI incidence and prevalence for females and males have increased annually by 9%–15% between 2015 and 2019 due to dating apps usage, and that STI incidence and prevalence will continue to increase in the future. The model is also used to assess the possible benefit of in-app prevention campaigns.
ahttps://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/std/STI-Incidence-Prevalence-Cost-Factsheet.htm
bA. N. Sawyer, E. R. Smith, and E. G. Benotsch. Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15:183–191, 2018.
Citation: Carlos Bustamante Orellana, Jordan Lyerla, Aaron Martin, Fabio Milner. Sexually transmitted infections and dating app use[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 3999-4035. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024177
Incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is rising sharply in the United States. Between 2014 and 2019, incidence among men and women has increased by 62.8% and 21.4%, respectively, with an estimated 68 million Americans contracting an STI in 2018.a Some human behaviors impacting the expanding STI epidemic are unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.b Increasing dating app usage has been postulated as a driver for increases in the numbers of people engaging in these behaviors. Using the proposed model, it is estimated that both STI incidence and prevalence for females and males have increased annually by 9%–15% between 2015 and 2019 due to dating apps usage, and that STI incidence and prevalence will continue to increase in the future. The model is also used to assess the possible benefit of in-app prevention campaigns.
ahttps://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/std/STI-Incidence-Prevalence-Cost-Factsheet.htm
bA. N. Sawyer, E. R. Smith, and E. G. Benotsch. Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15:183–191, 2018.
[1] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Incidence, Prevalence, and Cost of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States, Fact Sheets, 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/std/STI-Incidence-Prevalence-Cost-Factsheet.htm |
[2] | World Health Organization, Sexually transmitted infections (STIs), Fact Sheets, 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis) |
[3] | T. Morris, Dating in 2021: Swiping left on COVID-19, Global Web Index, 2021. Available from: https://blog.gwi.com/chart-of-the-week/online-dating/ |
[4] | M. Lenahan, Dating app engagement surpasses pre-pandemic levels, Apptopia, 2020. Available from: https://blog.apptopia.com/dating-app-engagement-has-surpassed-pre-pandemic-levels |
[5] | S. Dixon, U.S. smartphone dating app users 2019–2023, Statista, 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/274144/smartphone-dating-app-users-usa/ |
[6] | R. A. Bable, J. Ackerlund Brandt, Delay Discounting, Dating Applications, and Risky Sexual Behavior: An Exploratory Study, Psychol. Record, 72 (2022), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00506-6 doi: 10.1007/s40732-021-00506-6 |
[7] | A. N. Sawyer, E. R. Smith, E. G. Benotsch, Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults, Sexual. Res. Soc. Policy, 15 (2018), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6 doi: 10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6 |
[8] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2021/tables/5a.htm |
[9] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The State of STDs – Infographic. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/infographic.htm |
[10] | J. M. Kesten, K. Dias, F. Burns, P. Crook, A. Howarth, C. H. Mercer, et al., Acceptability and potential impact of delivering sexual health promotion information through social media and dating apps to MSM in England: A qualitative study, BMC Public Health, 19 (2019), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7558-7 doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7558-7 |
[11] | A. Lajmanovich, J. A. Yorke, A deterministic model for gonorrhea in a nonhomogeneous population, Math. Biosci., 28 (1976), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(76)90125-5 doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(76)90125-5 |
[12] | H. W. Hethcote, J. A. Yorke, Gonorrhea Transmission Dynamics and Control, in Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 56, Springer-Verlag, (1984), Berlin and New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07544-9 |
[13] | K. Dietz, K. P. Hadeler, Epidemiological models for sexually transmitted diseases, Journal of mathematical biology, 26 (1988), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280169 doi: 10.1007/BF00280169 |
[14] | M. E. Kretzschmar, Deterministic and stochastic pair formation models for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, J. Biol. Syst., 3 (1995), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339095000721 doi: 10.1142/S0218339095000721 |
[15] | M. E. Kretzschmar, Y. T. van Duynhoven, A. J. Severijnen, Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and chlamydia using stochastic network simulations, American Journal of Epidemiology, 144 (1996), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008926 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008926 |
[16] | M. E. Kretzschmar, R. Welte, A. van den Hoek, M. J. Postma, Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for chlamydia trachomatis infections, Am. J. Epidemiol., 153 (2001), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.1.90 doi: 10.1093/aje/153.1.90 |
[17] | M. E. Kretzschmar, K. M. E. Turner, P. M. Barton, W. J. Edmunds, N. Low, Predicting the population impact of chlamydia screening programmes: Comparative mathematical modelling study, Sexual. Transmit. Infect., 85 (2009), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.036251 doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.036251 |
[18] | M. Kretzschmar, J. C. M. Heijne, Pair formation models for sexually transmitted infections: A primer, Infect. Disease Model., 2 (2017), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2017.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2017.07.002 |
[19] | W. M. Geringer, M. Hinton, Three models to promote syphilis screening and treatment in a high risk population, J. Commun. Health, 18 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325158 |
[20] | F. A. Milner, R. Zhao, A new mathematical model of syphilis, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 5 (2010), 96–108. |
[21] | P. L. Peterson, D. G. Ostrow, D. J. McKirnan, Behavioral interventions for the primary prevention of HIV infection among homosexual and bisexual men, J. Primary Prevent., 12 (1991), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326539 doi: 10.1007/BF01326539 |
[22] | O. Angulo, F. A. Milner, L. Sega, A SIR epidemic model structured by immunological variables, J. Biol. Syst., 21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339013400135 |
[23] | O. Angulo, F. A. Milner, L. Sega, Immunological models of epidemics, MACI (Matemática Aplicada, Computacional e Industrial), 4 (2013), 53–56. |
[24] | G. R. Bauer, S. L. Welles, Beyond assumptions of negligible risk: sexually transmitted diseases and women who have sex with women, Am. J. Public Health, 91 (2001), 1282–1286. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.8.1282 doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1282 |
[25] | E. Torrone, J. Papp, H. Weinstock, Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection Among Persons Aged 14–39 Years — United States, 2007–2012, Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep., 63 (2014), 834–838. |
[26] | C. Bustamante Orellana, J. Lyerla, A. Martin, F. Milner, E. Smith, Estimating the structure by age and sex of the US sexually active population, Math. Popul. Stud., Routledge, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2024.2301868 |
[27] | B. G. Everett, Sexual orientation disparities in sexually transmitted infections: examining the intersection between sexual identity and sexual behavior, Arch. Sexual Behav., 42 (2013), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9902-1 doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9902-1 |
[28] | P. A. Cavazos-Rehg, M. J. Krauss, E. L. Spitznagel, M. Schootman, K. K. Bucholz, J. F. Peipert, et al., Age of sexual debut among US adolescents, Contraception, 80 (2009), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.014 |
[29] | C. L. Althaus, K. M. Turner, B. V. Schmid, J. C. Heijne, M. Kretzschmar, N. Low, Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis through sexual partnerships: A comparison between three individual-based models and empirical data, J. Royal Soc. Int., 9 (2021), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0131 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0131 |
[30] | R. D. Kirkcaldy, E. Weston, A. C. Segurado, G. Hughes, Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: A global perspective, Sex Health, 16 (2019), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19061 doi: 10.1071/SH19061 |
[31] | E. Arias, M. Heron, J. Xu, United States Life Tables, 2014, Nat. Vital Stat. Rep., 66 (2017), Division of Vital Statistics. |
[32] | M. Iannelli, A. Pugliese, An introduction to mathematical population dynamics, Springer Cham, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03026-5 |
[33] | C. Vargas de León, On the global stability of SIS, SIR and SIRS epidemic models with standard incidence, Chaos Solit. Fract., 44 (2011), 1106–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2011.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2011.09.002 |
[34] | P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00108-6 |
[35] | A. E. Ontiveros Salazar, P. H. Goh, S. Kasliwal, J. Khim, Cubic Discriminant, Brilliant.org. Available from: https://brilliant.org/wiki/cubic-discriminant/ |