Correction
A note on Insider information and its relation with the arbitrage condition and the utility maximization problem
-
Received:
23 November 2022
Revised:
23 November 2022
Accepted:
21 February 2023
Published:
28 February 2023
-
-
-
-
We prove that Theorem 4.16 in [1] is false by constructing a strategy that generates $ (FLVR)_{ \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{G})} $. However, we success to prove that the no arbitrage property still holds when the agent only plays with strategies belonging to the admissible set called buy-and-hold.
Citation: Bernardo D'Auria, José Antonio Salmerón. A note on Insider information and its relation with the arbitrage condition and the utility maximization problem[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 8305-8307. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023362
-
Abstract
We prove that Theorem 4.16 in [1] is false by constructing a strategy that generates $ (FLVR)_{ \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{G})} $. However, we success to prove that the no arbitrage property still holds when the agent only plays with strategies belonging to the admissible set called buy-and-hold.
References
[1]
|
B. D'Auria, J. A. Salmerón, Insider information and its relation with the arbitrage condition and the utility maximization problem, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 998–1019. 10.3934/mbe.2020053 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020053
|
-
-
-
-