Research article Special Issues

Characterization of the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of epoxy-silica functionally graded materials

  • Received: 28 August 2022 Revised: 19 December 2022 Accepted: 13 January 2023 Published: 18 January 2023
  • A functionally graded material (FGM) was prepared using epoxy resin reinforced with silicon dioxide with a particle size of 100 μm and weight percentages of 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 wt%. In a gravity-molding process using the hand layup technique, specimens with international standard (ASTM)-calculated dimensions were created in a mold of poly(methyl methacrylate), which is also known as acrylic. Tensile, flexural, impact, infrared wave, and thermal conductivity tests, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted on specimens of the five layers of the FGM. The XRD and infrared spectroscopy demonstrated that the compositions of the silica particles and epoxy had a strong association with their physical structures. The findings of experimental tests indicated that increasing the ratio of silicon dioxide enhanced the mechanical properties, and the increase in modulus of elasticity was directly related to the weight percentage of the reinforcement material. The composite with 80% silica had a 526.88% higher modulus of elasticity than the pure epoxy specimen. Both tensile and flexural strengths of the composite material were maximal when 40 wt% of the particle silicon dioxide was utilized, which were 68.5% and 67.8% higher than those of the neat epoxy, respectively. The test results also revealed that the impact resistance of the FGM increased when the silica proportion increased, with a maximum value of 60 wt% silica particle content, which was an increase of 76.98% compared to pure epoxy. In addition, the thermal properties of epoxy resin improved when SiO2 was added to the mixture. Thus, the addition of silica filler to composite materials directly proportionally increased their thermal conductivity to the weight ratio of the reinforcement material, which was 32.68–383.66%. FGM composed of up to 80% silica particles had the highest thermal conductivity.

    Citation: Jaafar Sh. AbdulRazaq, Abdul Kareem F. Hassan, Nuha H. Jasim. Characterization of the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of epoxy-silica functionally graded materials[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(1): 182-199. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023010

    Related Papers:

  • A functionally graded material (FGM) was prepared using epoxy resin reinforced with silicon dioxide with a particle size of 100 μm and weight percentages of 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 wt%. In a gravity-molding process using the hand layup technique, specimens with international standard (ASTM)-calculated dimensions were created in a mold of poly(methyl methacrylate), which is also known as acrylic. Tensile, flexural, impact, infrared wave, and thermal conductivity tests, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted on specimens of the five layers of the FGM. The XRD and infrared spectroscopy demonstrated that the compositions of the silica particles and epoxy had a strong association with their physical structures. The findings of experimental tests indicated that increasing the ratio of silicon dioxide enhanced the mechanical properties, and the increase in modulus of elasticity was directly related to the weight percentage of the reinforcement material. The composite with 80% silica had a 526.88% higher modulus of elasticity than the pure epoxy specimen. Both tensile and flexural strengths of the composite material were maximal when 40 wt% of the particle silicon dioxide was utilized, which were 68.5% and 67.8% higher than those of the neat epoxy, respectively. The test results also revealed that the impact resistance of the FGM increased when the silica proportion increased, with a maximum value of 60 wt% silica particle content, which was an increase of 76.98% compared to pure epoxy. In addition, the thermal properties of epoxy resin improved when SiO2 was added to the mixture. Thus, the addition of silica filler to composite materials directly proportionally increased their thermal conductivity to the weight ratio of the reinforcement material, which was 32.68–383.66%. FGM composed of up to 80% silica particles had the highest thermal conductivity.



    加载中


    [1] Jahromi BH, Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, et al. (2010) Autofrettage of layered and functionally graded metal-ceramic composite vessels. Compos Struct 92: 1813–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2010.01.019 doi: 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2010.01.019
    [2] Abood AM, Khazal H, Hassan AF (2021) On the determination of first-mode stress intensity factors and T-stress in a continuous functionally graded beam using digital image correlation method. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.768 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.768
    [3] Willert-Porada M (2010) Design and fabrication strategy in the world of functional gradation. Int J Mater Prod Technol 39: 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2010.034260 doi: 10.1504/IJMPT.2010.034260
    [4] Bondioli F, Cannillo V, Fabbri E, et al. (2006) Preparation and characterization of epoxy resins filled with submicron spherical zirconia particles. Polimery 51: 794–798. https://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2006.794 doi: 10.14314/polimery.2006.794
    [5] Haque ZU, Turner DT (1987) Influence of particulate fillers on the indentation hardness of a glassy cross-linked polymer. J Mater Sci 22: 3379–3384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01161208 doi: 10.1007/BF01161208
    [6] Conradi M (2013) Nanosilica-reinforced polymer composites. Mater Tehnol 3: 285–293. Available from: http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-KHZVVWFD
    [7] Phong NT, Gabr MH, Anh LH, et al. (2013) Improved fracture toughness and fatigue life of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite due to incorporation of rubber nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 48: 6039–6047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7400-z doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7400-z
    [8] Schmidt D, Shah D, Giannelis EP (2002) New advances in polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 6: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00049-9 doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00049-9
    [9] Shen M, Bever MB (1972) Gradients in polymeric materials. J Mater Sci 7: 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00549902 doi: 10.1007/BF00549902
    [10] Woldemariam MH, Belingardi G, Koricho EG, et al. (2019) Effects of nanomaterials and particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of composite materials: a short review. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1191 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1191
    [11] Hassan AF, Abood AM, Khalaf HI, et al. (2022) A review of functionally graded materials including their manufacture and applications. Int J Mech Eng 7: 744–755. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1936049/v1 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1936049/v1
    [12] Chmielewski M, Pietrzak K (2016) Metal-ceramic functionally graded materials - manufacturing, characterization, application. Bull Polish Acad Sci Tech Sci 64: 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1515/bpasts-2016-0017 doi: 10.1515/bpasts-2016-0017
    [13] Hadj Mostefa A, Merdaci S, Mahmoudi N (2018) An overview of functionally graded materials «FGM». SMSD 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89707-3_30 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89707-3_30
    [14] Araki N, Tang DW, Ohtani A (2006) Evaluation of thermophysical properties of functionally graded materials. Int J Thermophys 27: 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10765-006-0034-5 doi: 10.1007/S10765-006-0034-5
    [15] El-Galy IM, Saleh BI, Ahmed MH (2019) Functionally graded materials classifications and development trends from industrial point of view. SN Appl Sci 1: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-019-1413-4 doi: 10.1007/S42452-019-1413-4
    [16] Gasik MM (2010) Functionally Graded Materials: Bulk processing techniques. Int J Mater Prod Technol 39: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2010.034257 doi: 10.1504/IJMPT.2010.034257
    [17] Park JJ, Yoon KG, Lee JY (2011) Thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy/micro- and nano- mixed silica composites for insulation materials of heavy electric equipment. Trans Electr Electron Mater 12: 98–101. https://doi.org/10.4313/TEEM.2011.12.3.98 doi: 10.4313/TEEM.2011.12.3.98
    [18] Farouq W, Khazal H, Hassan AKF, (2019) Fracture analysis of functionally graded material using digital image correlation technique and extended element-free Galerkin method. Opt Lasers Eng 121: 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.04.021 doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.04.021
    [19] Migliaresi C, Pegoretti A (2002) Fundamentals of polymeric composite materials. Integr Biomater Sci 69–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47583-9_3 doi: 10.1007/0-306-47583-9_3
    [20] Linec M, Mušič B (2019) The effects of silica-based fillers on the properties of epoxy molding compounds. Materials (Basel) 12: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111811 doi: 10.3390/ma12111811
    [21] Al-Ajaj EA, Alguraby AS, Jawad MK (2015) Nano-SiO2 addition effect on flexural stress and hardness of EP/MWCNT. Eng Tech J 33: 1248–1257. Available from: https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_116689.html.
    [22] Rihan Y, Abd El-Bary B (2012) Wear resistance and electrical properties of functionally graded epoxy-resin/silica composites. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 44: 23–27. Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:44066233.
    [23] Muslim NB, Hamzah AF, Al-kawaz AE, (2018) Study of mechanical properties of wollastonite filled epoxy functionally graded composite. Int J Mech Eng Technol 9: 669–677. Available from: http://repository.uobabylon.edu.iq/papers/publication.aspx?pubid=18509.
    [24] Parihar RS, Setti SG, Sahu RK (2018) Recent advances in the manufacturing processes of functionally graded materials: A review. Sci Eng Compos Mater 25: 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0395 doi: 10.1515/secm-2015-0395
    [25] Sombatsompop N, Wood AK (1997) Measurement of thermal conductivity of polymers using an improved Lee's Disc apparatus. Polym Test 16: 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(96)00043-8 doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(96)00043-8
    [26] Pandey A, Kattamuri PK, Sastry BS (2021) Measurement of thermal conductivity of sandstone using Lee's apparatus: A case study. Mining Metall Explor 38: 1997–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00461-4 doi: 10.1007/s42461-021-00461-4
    [27] Daramola OO, Akintayo O (2017) Mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites reinforced with green silica particles. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara-Int J Eng 4: 167–174. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327551546.
    [28] Sipaut CS, Ahmad N, Adnan R, et al. (2007) Properties and morphology of bulk epoxy composites filled with modified fumed silica-epoxy nanocomposites. J Appl Sci 7: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.1315 doi: 10.1002/jrs.1315
    [29] Kim D, Chung I, Kim G (2014) Study on mechanical and thermal properties of fiber-reinforced epoxy/hybrid-silica composite. Fibers Polym 14: 2141–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-2141-9 doi: 10.1007/s12221-013-2141-9
    [30] Misra N, Kapusetti G, Pattanayak DK, et al. (2011) Fabrication and characterization of epoxy/silica functionally graded composite material. Indian J Phys 85: 1393–1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-011-0161-0 doi: 10.1007/s12648-011-0161-0
    [31] Ahmada T, Mamat O (2012) Tronoh silica sand nanoparticle production and applications design for composites. Defect Diffus Forum 330: 39–47. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.330.39
    [32] Chen L, Chai S, Liu K, et al. (2012) Enhanced epoxy/silica composites mechanical properties by introducing graphene oxide to the interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4: 4398–4404. https://doi.org/10.1021/am3010576 doi: 10.1021/am3010576
    [33] Yusra AFI, Khalil HPSA, Davoudpour Y, et al. (2015) Characterization of plant nanofiber-reinforced epoxy composites. BioResources 10: 8268–8280. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.4.8268-8280 doi: 10.15376/biores.10.4.8268-8280
    [34] Vikram Singh V, Jaiswal P, et al. (2021) Mechanical properties of silica fume reinforced epoxy glass microballoons syntactic foams. Mater Today Proc 46: 672–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.745 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.745
    [35] Park JJ (2018) Mechanical properties of epoxy/micro-silica and epoxy/micro-alumina composites. Trans Electr Electron Mater 19: 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42341-018-0074-0 doi: 10.1007/s42341-018-0074-0
    [36] Park J, Park J (2018) Electrical and mechanical strength properties of epoxy/micro silica and alumina composites for power equipment for power equipment. J Korean Inst Electr Electron Mater Eng 31: 496–501. https://doi.org/10.4313/JKEM.2018.31.7.496 doi: 10.4313/JKEM.2018.31.7.496
    [37] Ozcan UE, Karabork F, Yazman S, et al. (2019) Effect of silica/graphene nanohybrid particles on the mechanical properties of epoxy coatings. Arab J Sci Eng 44: 5723–5731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03724-x doi: 10.1007/s13369-019-03724-x
    [38] Alameri I, Oltulu M (2020) Mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by silica-based materials of various sizes. Appl Nanosci 10: 4087–4102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01516-6 doi: 10.1007/s13204-020-01516-6
    [39] Poh CL, Mariatti M, Ahmad Fauzi MN, et al. (2014) Tensile, dielectric, and thermal properties of epoxy composites filled with silica, mica, and calcium carbonate. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 25: 2111–2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-1847-9 doi: 10.1007/s10854-014-1847-9
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1814) PDF downloads(169) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(13)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog