Editorial

Neuroimaging with SPECT-MRI: a myth or reality?

  • Received: 14 March 2023 Accepted: 27 March 2023 Published: 31 March 2023
  • Citation: Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige. Neuroimaging with SPECT-MRI: a myth or reality?[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(1): 52-55. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023004

    Related Papers:



  • Neuroimaging techniques are critical for the study of the human brain and the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders. Among these techniques, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are well-established methods for functional and structural imaging, respectively. The combination of these two techniques, known as SPECT-MR, has emerged as a promising modality for neuroimaging research and clinical practice [1] SPECT-MR combines the strengths of SPECT and MRI to provide a comprehensive view of the brain's functional and structural properties. SPECT relies on the injection of a radiotracer, which emits gamma rays that are detected by a gamma camera. This produces a 3D image of the distribution of the radiotracer in the brain, reflecting local blood flow or metabolism. MRI, on the other hand, uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce high-resolution images of the brain's anatomy. In SPECT-MR, the SPECT data is co-registered and fused with the MRI data to create a single image that integrates functional and structural information. This is achieved by using specialized software that combines the SPECT and MRI data and allows for visualization of the functional changes in the context of the brain's structure. See Figure 1 [2].

    A combined SPECT/MRI platform was first proposed in 2007 by Breton et al. who used a single pinhole SPECT system adjacent to a 0.1T magnet. The low MRI field strength made this solution suboptimal for use in routine preclinical research. However, since then systems combining SPECT and MRI have been introduced with both higher SPECT sensitivity and resolution and higher MRI field strengths [17]. To date, the SPECT/MRI system has been introduced to the market exclusively by MR Solutions (UK) allowing for sequential imaging of small animals at 9.4T, while simultaneous imaging systems are not yet commercially available [6]. One advantage of SPECT-MR is its ability to provide both functional and structural information of the brain in a single imaging session. This can reduce the need for multiple imaging sessions and increase patient comfort and convenience. Additionally, SPECT-MR has a higher spatial resolution than traditional SPECT imaging, which allows for more precise localization of functional changes within the brain [7]. SPECT is an attractive alternative to PET for preclinical studies due to its potential for better spatial resolution resulting from pinhole magnification. Additionally, SPECT allows for the use of multiple radionuclides that target different biomarkers and can use longer-lived and more accessible radionuclides. Operating costs for SPECT are also lower than for PET. Combining SPECT with MRI has further advantages, including providing high-contrast anatomical images that can be combined with SPECT acquisitions and using multiple pulse sequences to provide complementary functional measures, such as MR-spectroscopy. The availability of high-resolution anatomy from MRI, which has superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT (and lacks ionizing radiation), can also aid in SPECT quantification with correction for partial volume effects [15],[16].

    SPECT-MR has many potential applications in neuroscience research and clinical practice. One major application is in the diagnosis and management of neurological and psychiatric disorders. SPECT-MR can be used to identify patterns of brain activity associated with different disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and depression. This can lead to more accurate diagnoses and more effective treatment strategies [3],[4]. SPECT-MR can be used to identify the epileptogenic focus in patients with epilepsy. The process of co-registering ictal SPECT with MRI, similar to PET, can enhance its precision and ability to exhibit more accurate anatomical localization. This innovative method is known as subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered with MRI (SISCOM) and has been linked to favorable postoperative outcomes and eradication of seizures when used to identify the epileptogenic focus. Moreover, SPECT co-registered with MRI is beneficial in pinpointing the precise location for the placement of intracranial EEG leads during invasive recording, thereby minimizing potential complications. It is also capable of detecting the ictal focus with high sensitivity in cases of extratemporal lobe epilepsy [5]. SPECT-MR can be used to study the regional cerebral blood flow in patients with Alzheimer's disease. By combining SPECT with MR, it is possible to identify the specific regions of the brain that show reduced blood flow and metabolism, allowing for targeted treatment [8]. SPECT-MR can be used to study the dopaminergic system in patients with Parkinson's disease. The SPECT component can provide functional information about the dopaminergic system, while the MR component can provide high-resolution anatomical details. Also, it has been shown that advanced MRI techniques as diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging, MR-spectroscopy, magntization-transfer imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry are more delicate in separating PD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes. By combining these two imaging modalities, clinicians can precisely locate the area of abnormal dopaminergic activity, which is critical in the diagnosis and management of Parkinson's disease [9],[10]. SPECT-MR can be used to study the metabolism and blood flow in brain tumors. The SPECT component can provide functional information about the tumor's blood flow and metabolism including receptor binding, uptake and metabolism of exogenous compounds, heamodynamics, etc. while the MR component can provide high-resolution anatomical details. By combining these two imaging modalities, clinicians can accurately locate the tumor and assess its growth and response to treatment [11]. Another application of SPECT-MR is in the study of brain function and cognition. SPECT-MR can be used to map changes in brain activity associated with specific tasks, such as language processing, memory encoding, and emotion regulation. This can help researchers understand how the brain works and how different regions of the brain interact with each other [12]. SPECT-MR also has potential applications in the study of drug development and pharmacology. By mapping changes in brain activity associated with different drugs, SPECT-MR can help researchers identify new therapeutic targets and evaluate the efficacy of different treatments [13].

    However, there are also some limitations to SPECT-MR. SPECT-MR is a relatively new imaging technique, and as such, it is not widely available in all hospitals and medical centers. This is also related to the cost and complexity of the technique, which may make it less accessible to some researchers and clinicians. One limitation is its relatively low temporal resolution since SPECT is dependent on the haemodynamic response and sufficient detection of photon emissions, which limits its ability to capture rapid changes in brain activity. In addition, there are technical challenges: SPECT-MR requires specialized expertise and equipment. The complexity of the imaging process and the need for advanced data analysis can lead to technical challenges that require highly skilled personnel [14].

    SPECT-MR is a promising imaging modality that has the potential to advance our understanding of the brain and its disorders. While there are still some technical and practical limitations to be overcome, ongoing research and development in this area hold great promise for the future of neuroscience research and clinical practice. The integration of functional and structural imaging with SPECT-MR represents a significant step forward in neuroimaging and has the potential to improve our understanding of brain function and lead to better diagnoses and treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders [15].

    Figure 1.  MR and SPECT images have been fused to create a MR/SPECT image. Adapted from Takeshi Hara et al. (2016) J Nucl Med. 57:1936.


    Conflicts of interest



    The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

    [1] Hutton BF, Occhipinti M, Kuehne A, et al. (2018) Development of clinical simultaneous SPECT/MRI. Brit J Radiol 91: 20160690. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160690
    [2] Yandrapalli S, Puckett Y (2022) SPECT Imaging - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf.SPECT Imaging - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564426/
    [3] Amen DG, Easton M (2021) A New Way Forward: How Brain SPECT Imaging Can Improve Outcomes and Transform Mental Health Care Into Brain Health Care. Front Psychiatry 12: 715315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.715315
    [4] Bernsen MR, Vaissier PEB, Van Holen R, et al. (2014) The role of preclinical SPECT in oncological and neurological research in combination with either CT or MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41: 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2685-3
    [5] Algahtany M, Abdrabou A, Elhaddad A, et al. (2021) Advances in Brain Imaging Techniques for Patients With Intractable Epilepsy. Front Neurosci 15: 699123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.699123
    [6] MRS*SPECT/CT/MR -MR Solutions. (n.d.). MRS*SPECT/CT/MR -MR Solutions . https://www.mrsolutions.com/molecular-imaging/molecular-imaging/spect-ct-mr/
    [7] Schneider A, Feussner H (2017) Diagnostic Procedures. Biomed Eng Gastrointest Surg : 87-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803230-5.00005-1
    [8] Bonte FJ, Ross ED, Chehabi HH, et al. (1986) SPECT study of regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer disease. J Comput Assist Tomo 10: 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198607000-00005
    [9] Mortezazadeh T, Seyedarabi H, Mahmoudian B, et al. (2021) Imaging modalities in differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: opportunities and challenges. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 52: 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00454-9
    [10] Booth TC, Nathan M, Waldman AD, et al. (2015) The role of functional dopamine-transporter SPECT imaging in parkinsonian syndromes, part 1. AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol 36: 229-235. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3970
    [11] Kauppinen RA, Peet AC (2011) Using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in cancer diagnostics and monitoring: preclinical and clinical approaches. Cancer Biol Ther 12: 665-679. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.12.8.18137
    [12] Amen DG, Trujillo M, Newberg A, et al. (2011) Brain SPECT Imaging in Complex Psychiatric Cases: An Evidence-Based, Underutilized Tool. Open Neuroimag J 5: 40-48. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874440001105010040
    [13] Son H, Jang K, Lee H, et al. (2019) Use of Molecular Imaging in Clinical Drug Development: a Systematic Review. Nucl Med Molec Imag 53: 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00593-y14
    [14] Lystad RP, Pollard H (2009) Functional neuroimaging: a brief overview and feasibility for use in chiropractic research. J Can Chiropr Assoc 53: 59-72.
    [15] Bouziotis P, Fiorini C (2014) SPECT/MRI: dreams or reality?. Clin Transl Imaging 2: 571-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-014-0095-6
    [16] Arachchige ASPM (2022) 7-Tesla PET/MRI: A promising tool for multimodal brain imaging?. AIMS Neurosci 9: 516-518. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2022029
    [17] Breton E, Choquet P, Goetz C, et al. (2007) Dual SPECT/MR imaging in small animal. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 571: 446-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.131
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. A.S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige, Empowering radiology: the transformative role of ChatGPT, 2023, 78, 00099260, 851, 10.1016/j.crad.2023.08.006
    2. Juan‐Juan Lu, Xiang‐Xin Xing, Jiao Qu, Jia‐Jia Wu, Mou‐Xiong Zheng, Xu‐Yun Hua, Jian‐Guang Xu, Alterations of contralesional hippocampal subfield volumes and relations to cognitive functions in patients with unilateral stroke, 2024, 14, 2162-3279, 10.1002/brb3.3645
    3. Bruno S. Athanasio, Ana Cecília de Sena Oliveira, Ana Luísa Pedrosa, Rafael S. Borges, Avelar O. M. Neto, Rafael A. Oliveira, Elisa de Paula França de Resende, Renata Freire de Moraes, Paulo Caramelli, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, The role of brain perfusion SPECT in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: A systematic review, 2024, 34, 1051-2284, 308, 10.1111/jon.13189
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1948) PDF downloads(74) Cited by(3)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog