This paper examines how financial reporting modes are determined within a company, from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The modes investigated include financial reporting regimes (e.g. International Financial Reporting Standards, UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangibles and investments, treatment of development costs). A stated preference approach is adopted and applied to a fieldwork analysis of the functioning of a large port authority, which was a member of a group and prepared both consolidated and subsidiary accounts. The analysis is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth such matters as key factors in making choices, the decision-making processes behind choices, and the staging of decisions, but underpinned by a quantitative basis, using a metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. Our analysis aims to improve our understanding of a company's choice processes underlying its financial reporting, including its handling of complexity and uncertainty, and its use of innovations in techniques and organisational forms for decision support.
Citation: Gavin C Reid, Julia A Smith, Yu-Lin Hsu. Choices of financial reporting regimes and techniques and underlying decision-making processes: a case study analysis of a port authority[J]. National Accounting Review, 2021, 3(2): 137-151. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2021007
This paper examines how financial reporting modes are determined within a company, from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The modes investigated include financial reporting regimes (e.g. International Financial Reporting Standards, UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangibles and investments, treatment of development costs). A stated preference approach is adopted and applied to a fieldwork analysis of the functioning of a large port authority, which was a member of a group and prepared both consolidated and subsidiary accounts. The analysis is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth such matters as key factors in making choices, the decision-making processes behind choices, and the staging of decisions, but underpinned by a quantitative basis, using a metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. Our analysis aims to improve our understanding of a company's choice processes underlying its financial reporting, including its handling of complexity and uncertainty, and its use of innovations in techniques and organisational forms for decision support.
| [1] |
Adamowicz W, Louviere J, Williams M (1994) Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. J Environ Econ Manage 26: 271-292. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1017
|
| [2] |
Ball R (2006) International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting Bus Res 36: 5-27. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040
|
| [3] |
Boden R, Froud J (1996) Obeying the rules: Accounting for regulatory compliance costs in the United Kingdom. Accounting Organ Society 21: 529-547. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00034-8
|
| [4] |
Bruggemann U, Hitz J, Sellhorn T (2013) Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: A Review of Extant Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research. Eur Accounting Rev 22: 1-37. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.718487
|
| [5] |
Cazavan-Jeny A, Jeanjean T, Joos P (2011) Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R & D accounting in France. J Accounting Public Policy 30: 145-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.016
|
| [6] |
Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW (1990) Dialectic tension, double reflexivity and the everyday accounting researcher: on using qualitative methods. Accounting Organ Society 15: 543-573. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(90)90034-R
|
| [7] |
Fields TD, Lys TZ, Vincent L (2001) Empirical research on accounting choice. J Accounting Econ 31: 255-307. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
|
| [8] |
Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J Accounting Econ 40: 3-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
|
| [9] |
Haka SF (1987) Capital budgeting techniques and firm specific contingencies: a correlational analysis. Accounting Organ Society 12: 31-48. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90014-6
|
| [10] |
Hensher DA (1994) Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice. Transportation 21: 107-133. doi: 10.1007/BF01098788
|
| [11] |
Holthausen RW (1990) Accounting method choice. J Accounting Econ 12: 207-218. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8
|
| [12] |
Messier WF, Quick LA, Vandervelde SD (2014) The influence of process accountability and accounting standard type on auditor usage of a status quo heuristic. Accounting Organ Society 39: 59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2013.12.002
|
| [13] |
Power B, Reid GC (2018) Decision support for firm performance by real options analytics. Managerial Decis Econ 39: 56-64. doi: 10.1002/mde.2867
|
| [14] | Reid GC, Smith JA (2007) Reporting in Small Firms. Financ Manage, 31-33. |
| [15] |
Schipper K (2010) How Can We Measure the Costs and Benefits of Changes in Financial Reporting Standards? Accounting Bus Res 40: 309-327. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663406
|
| [16] |
Schlapfer F, Schmitt M, Roschewiz A (2008) Competitive Politics, Simplified Heuristics, and Preference for Public Goods. Ecol Econ 65: 574-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.008
|
 NAR-03-02-007-s001.pdf |
 |
Gavin C Reid, Julia A Smith, Yu-Lin Hsu. Choices of financial reporting regimes and techniques and underlying decision-making processes: a case study analysis of a port authority[J]. National Accounting Review, 2021, 3(2): 137-151. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2021007
DownLoad: